Lives in Art: Isherwood and Bachardy.
Freeman, Chris
IT HAPPENED on a typical day in sun-drenched Southern California in
the early 1950's. Two men met on the "queer" side of Will
Rogers Beach in Santa Monica. It was, despite the setup, all rather
innocent. Within two months, they would begin a fearless, challenging,
and devoted romance that would last for the next 33 years. On that
afternoon, in that moment, all could have been lost to history save for
the fact that one of the men was 49-year-old Christopher Isherwood,
already an accomplished author, and the other a captivating and spirited
eighteen-year old, Don Bachardy, whose portraits of the celebrated and
powerful would one day enchant the world.
Over a decade ago, Jim Berg and I began studying the Anglo-American
writer Isherwood. It became immediately clear to us that to do justice
to the American Isherwood, we would have to focus on both Isherwood and
his longtime partner, Don Bachardy. In the introduction to our first
book, The Isherwood Century, we included a section called "Chris
and Don Alive," in which we wrote that we hoped to provide readers
with a "sense of Isherwood and Bachardy actively constructing their
lives and work together." There's another part in the book
called "Artist and Companion" that's dedicated to both
men and their collaborations. To introduce that aspect of the story, we
wrote: "With few models to emulate, Isherwood and Bachardy
developed their relationship as lovers, partners, friends, and
collaborators. In spite of the notoriously homophobic environment in the
Hollywood of the 1950's, they insisted on defying the prevailing
culture and lived their lives in the open."
Jim and I are both thrilled to be included in the new documentary,
Chris & Don: A Love Story, directed by Guido Santi and Tina Mascara.
One of the most favorably reviewed films of 2008, Chris & Don uses
home movies from the 1950's, interviews with Bachardy, commentary
from friends and scholars, and even charming animation sequences to
provide fresh views of these men, dubbed by Armistead Maupin as
"the first couple."
Like most independent films, this one is a labor of love. Santi,
who has known Bachardy for a long time, began contemplating a film on
Isherwood and Bachardy years ago. For various reasons, it never got off
the ground, until almost five years ago, when Santi teamed with Tina
Mascara, a young filmmaker who also happened to be his romantic partner.
Already an interesting dynamic emerges: a relatively new straight couple
making a film about a great, long-term gay relationship. Part of the
genius of the film is that it isn't polemical. The filmmakers
worked tirelessly, conducted many interviews, and raised some money. Who
knew that they would finish the film, find the perfect distributor in
Zeitgeist Films, and have it released just as the California Supreme
Court legalized gay marriage?
The film's essence is revealed in its subtitle: "A Love
Story." As reviewer Ernest Hardy noted in LA Weekly, "as
confetti and champagne toasts greet the news, it might be a good thing
for gays and straights to glean some lessons from Isherwood and
Bachardy's example: Make your own rules, set your own terms for
connection, and be willing to let them evolve as you and your partner
hopefully do." The evolution of Chris and Don't relationship
is revealed in the ninety-minute film as we see fifty years pass before
us.
Because he liked Santi and Mascara--and because he was never quite
convinced that a film would finally get made--Bachardy tried to be
candid: "We were friends. I liked pleasing them. They got some
great material from me." He also gave them reels and reels of those
amazing 16-millimeter home movies, which were in remarkably good
condition. Having seen the film a dozen or more times, Bachardy has been
moved each time, usually connecting to all that footage of the young
couple in love: "Seeing what Chris saw of me through the camera
lens is very moving to me." He also loves "seeing Chris
looking so beautiful, as he did when we first knew each other.
That's lovely."
Suffice it to say that there's something here for everyone: a
portrait of a longtime partnership that could never have been easy but
turns out to have been worth it; a view of a kind of life that one can
no longer really live; and all that astonishing footage of cultural
luminaries from Igor Stravinsky and E.M. Forster and W.H. Auden (dancing
around like kids with Isherwood) to 101 Dalmatians author Dodie Smith,
complete with a dalmatian. A better film could scarcely have been
fashioned out of this material.
If there weren't this kind of footage and millions of words of
diaries to substantiate it, no one would quite believe the scope of the
life Chris and Don shared. The filmmakers recreate the horror story of
visiting Paul Bowled in Tangiers-when Bowles got the two men stoned on
hashish and tried to come between them. One of the most amazing parts of
the movie takes viewers to Key West with Tennessee Williams, Burt
Lancaster, and Anna Magnani on location for The Rose Tattoo. That
experience helped aspiring star Bachardy get over his hope of being in
the movies: "like all extras, we were treated like cattle," he
laments.
What Bachardy needed in the late 1950's, as he was more than
five years into this relationship with the much older and highly
accomplished Isherwood, was a vocation. He found it in drawing and
painting, and he began going to art school. Isherwood was the subject of
much of Bachardy's work and, most importantly, he was
Bachardy's biggest booster. In the film, Bachardy says that his
father never wanted Isherwood to visit the family home, only half an
hour away from Santa Monica in nearby Glendale. Furthermore, the elder
Bachardy actively discouraged his son from pursuing a career in art,
hating his son's queerness. Add to that the close relationship Don
had with his older brother Ted, through whom he met Isherwood, and the
family complications for the young man are clear. Ted suffered from
manic depression and schizophrenia, and young Don feared that he was
like Ted. Isherwood's diaries reflect that anxiety. A scene in
which Don visits Ted (who has died since that scene was filmed) and
takes him to see Capote is heartbreaking.
At Bachardy's first solo exhibit, which was in early
1960's London, Chris felt a great pride. As the voice of Michael
York reads from Isherwood's diaries, we see some of the keys to
this relationship: the older man acknowledges his role as mentor and
father, and he owns up to the "egotism" of taking credit for
the younger man's success. What's clear is the mutual
recognition of the opportunity, the encouragement, and the love between
them as the men began to work together more comfortably and more
productively, notably during the last twenty years of their lives
together.
That period began just after the most difficult time--the infamous
seven-year itch didn't skip over Chris and Don. It was during that
time that Don began to emerge as an artist in his own right--and began
to see other men.lt was also when Isherwood wrote his masterpiece, A
Single Man (1964), his most overtly gay novel, in which protagonist
George is approaching sixty and living in a cozy home in Santa Monica
Canyon while grieving for his younger partner Jim, who recently died in
a car crash. Isherwood allowed himself to use fiction to imagine life
without Don. It wasn't pretty, or particularly happy. However, as
he noted in an interview with Carola Kaplan, he wasn't George,
exactly: "Being alone has not been my life experience, I'm
happy to say. Therefore, perhaps I was loading the dice a bit, but I
didn't feel up to juggling a domestic homosexual relationship on
top of all the other factors in the book. Just to sort of clear the
decks a bit, I wanted to have George by himself." The picture of
George alone allowed Isherwood to contemplate losing Don, a possibility
that broke his heart. As he's quoted as saying early in the film,
"Don may someday leave me, but I'd never leave him, unless he
ceased to need me."
[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]
In an otherwise favorable review of the film in The New Re-public,
Stanley Kaufmann wrote that "though the picture offers a colorful,
attractive portrait of Chris the man, it insufficiently celebrates his
distinction as a writer." To a point, of course, that's true,
but given the limits of time and space and the fact that this isn't
supposed to be about Isherwood the writer, the film does offer an
overview of Isherwood's career with well-chosen comments and
examples. Perhaps most significant is the quotation from
Isherwood's diary from the spring of 1953, in which his burgeoning
love for Don is coupled with his creeping dissatisfaction with fiction
and his imaginative move toward nonfiction: "The lack of
inclination to cope with a constructed, invented plot--the feeling, why
not write what one experiences from day to day? And then ... this
sinking-sick feeling of love for Don ... and the reality of that--so far
more than all this tiresome fiction. Why invent--when Life is so
prodigious?" The capitalization of Life in the diaries suggests the
awe that Isherwood was experiencing that first, magical spring with his
young lover.
Isherwood went on to write his most important nonfiction book,
Christopher and His Kind, in the mid-1970's. The memoir is a
retelling of the 1930's, the years he immortalized in The Berlin
Stories, but this time the tales are told without the guise of fiction.
That book's success--as Kate Bucknell says in the film, it was
Isherwood's best seller and readers lined up around the block to
get his autograph--catapulted him and Bachardy into the forefront of the
gay rights movement and made them celebrities after a fashion. Bachardy
says, "We were made into speakers for the cause. We were
professional personalities. We went public that way, but personally we
were very much private and withdrawn--but we were always out as a
couple. The community cheered us on and we felt obligated. It meant a
great deal to our tribe and to the two of us. Chris was a wonderful
public speaker--he gloried in declaring victory for our cause."
This partnership continued to grow and to help move forward the gay
liberation movement.
Isherwood and Bachardy always made clear in interviews that they
were not a monogamous couple. They didn't want to be seen as
emulating a straight, conventional marriage. Relationships, as we all
know, are complicated. Isherwood himself had an interesting view of how
they work, which he described to Winston Leyland in 1973. Asked if his
deep relationships have been "satisfactory and fulfilling,"
Isherwood responded,
Fulfilling, yes. I'm a bit shy of the word "satisfactory." It suggests
that something has been delivered as ordered, according to
specifications. ... With love there ought to be a need to worry, every
moment. Love isn't an insurance policy. Love is tension. What I value
in a relationship is constant tension, in the sense of never being
under the illusion that one understands the other person. ... You
suddenly see a human being in all his magic ordinariness. And you know
thatyou can never understand him, never take him for granted. He's
eternally unpredictable--and so are you to him, if he loves you. And
that's the tension. That's what you hope will never end.
With Bachardy and Isherwood, certainly, it never ended. Even as
Isherwood was dying, as shown in the film's most poignant scene,
Bachardy and he collaborated constantly for the last six months.
Bachardy drew the ailing Isherwood every single day, sometimes nine or
ten times. Then, on the day Isherwood died, Bachardy kept working,
drawing the corpse of the man he'd spent his entire adult life
with. As Don says, haltingly, in the film, "Chris would have been
proud of me. He'd have said 'that's what an artist would
do.' And that's what an artist did."
The two men related to each other, throughout their relationship,
with pet identities: "Dubbin" for the old horse, Isherwood;
"Kitty" for the sometimes restless, feline Bachardy. The
film's animation sequences showing the two characters risk cuteness
but achieve a sweetness and provide an interesting message about
communication. During the couple's tough times, especially when
Bachardy spent time pursuing other men, Isherwood would ask him,
"How was the mousing tonight?" That teasing softened the hard
realities and allowed the men to talk to each other, getting through
some of the deepest pain and insecurity of their enduring partnership.
Bachardy sums up their lives together thus:
I don't take any credit for what's happened to me in my life. It all
seems fate--my destiny and Chris's destiny. We were actually exactly
what the other wanted and needed, whether we knew it or not. Well,
Chris knew it. I didn't for a long time. ... I know that Chris would
agree that the last ten years or so were our best--not the early years
when we were younger and beautiful, but the later years when we really
just enjoyed each other's company and worked together in a variety of
ways. It all just enhanced our basic unity--unity with each other, our
harmony.
It is in witnessing this kind of relationship evolve that those of
us who haven't been in such long-term partnerships can imagine how
two people might be able to make it work. Chris & Don: A Love Story
shows us that even vast disparities in class, age, and life experience
can melt away when two kindred spirits find each other.
REFERENCES
Berg, James J. and Chris Freeman. The Isherwood Century: Essays on
the Life and Work of Christopher Isherwood. University of Wisconsin
Press, 2000.
Berg, James J. and Chris Freeman, eds. Conversations with
Christopher Isherwood. University Press of Mississippi, 2001.
Hardy, Ernest. "Chris & Don: Opposites Attract." LA
Weekly, July 2, 2008.
Isherwood, Christopher. Diaries, Volume One: 1939-1960.
HarperCollins, 1997.
Kauffmann, Stanley. "Matters of Fact." The New Republic,
July 9, 2008.
Cover Art: Don Bachardly painting Christopher Isherwood in the
early 1980's. Chris & Don: A Love Story, a film by Guido Santi
& Tina Mascara. A Zeitgeist Films release. Photo: Jack Shear.
Chris Freeman has co-edited (with James Berg): The Isherwood
Century; Conversations with Christopher Isherwood, and Love, West
Hollywood: Reflections Of Los Angeles. A contributor to this journal for
over a dozen years, he teaches at the University of Southern California.