Mothering mothers: an exploration of the perceptions of adult children of divorce.
Hughes, Kate
Introduction
It is only within the very recent past that the children of the
divorce boom of the 1970s in Australia have grown to adulthood and are
in a position to reflect on the impact of their family's breakdown
on their lives. The outcomes for these children using various measures
of physical, psychological, emotional and financial wellbeing have been
widely explored in the divorce and clinical literature (see Amato, 2000;
King, 2002; Neale, 2001; Smart, and Neale, 2001; Wallerstein, 2000;
Wallerstein and Kelly, 1980; Wallerstein and Blakesless, 1990; Wells and
Johnston, 2001).
Little is known about the ways in which parental separation (1)
continues to shape the relationships between adult children and their
parents, although it is clear that the degree of ambivalence towards
parents correlates with conflict and poor parental relations in early
life (Willson, Shuey & Elder, 2003; Hallie, 2007) whether the
parents are separated or not. As parents age and their support needs
grow, the quality of their relationships with their children become
crucial (Bianchi, 2006; Willson, Shuey & Elder, 2006). Levels of
contact, and levels of intimacy appear to be key determinants to adult
children's willingness to offer care to their aging parents--where
contact levels have been low (commonly with fathers) support levels are
low and concomitantly, where intimacy levels are high (more commonly
with mothers) it has been assumed that ongoing support will be more
forthcoming (Wells and Johnson, 2001; Bianchi, 2006).
Intimacy (2) and distance are two themes central to the literature
relating to post-separation relationships. There appears to be a general
consensus that children and custodial mothers forge a close bond in the
immediate post separation period and this commonly persists into
adulthood (see Aquilino, 1994; Kruk, 1994; Arditti 1999). But there is
no consensus about the efficacy of this bond. Structural family
theorists, for example, type such a bond as an example of 'role
reversal' which transgresses the role boundaries which generate
healthy family dynamics, especially for children:
... when the parental alliance breaks down and the emotional
boundaries are blurred, the children may be induced to assume
spousal/parental functions. They may take on the role of confident,
peer or mentor to a distressed parent, as well as 'parent' to their
siblings (Johnston, 1990: 406).
In other words, children are commonly 'promoted' after
separation (Arditti, 1999a: 116) in a way which interferes with, and
ultimately destroys, the 'executive leadership' (Johnston,
1990: 405) of the parents. As the data from this project show, this can
also lead to adult children giving their parents a performance
appraisal. Workplace terminology aside, it is argued by Guttman and
Rosenberg (2003) that this inversion blurs the family's boundaries
which define both the relationships between individual family members
and the relationships between members and the larger family structure
per se. Quite what the long-term effects of this are is unclear.
Wallerstein's (2000) twenty five year longitudinal study of
separated families suggests that it may generate early maturation, and
more generally contribute to the plethora of difficulties experienced by
the adult children of divorce which the Wallerstein study recounts.
Similarly, Amato and Keith (1991) in a meta-analysis of the literature
to that date argue that the key three explanations for the relative lack
of achievement of the children of divorce are as follows; a decline in
their living standards, a depletion of their family structure and the
stress associated with the changes which divorce engenders. More
recently, there has been considerable attention paid in to the ways in
which these results can be ameliorated through the use of mediation
during the separation process (see Emery et al, 2001), an outcome which
informed the recent changes to the Family Law Act in Australia
(Australian Parliament House of Representatives Standing Committee on
Family and Community Affairs, 2003; Australian Parliament House of
Representatives Standing Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs,
2005).
Others argue that the increased intimacy between mothers and
children which commonly follows separation, whilst being transgressive
of patriarchal family roles and structures, nevertheless offers an
enrichment of the relationship (Arditti, 1999a, 1999b, Ardini and
Madden-Derdich, 1997; Paterson, 2001). Specifically:
... the decomposition of the authority structure and group size
increases communication and disclosure. Indeed there is some
evidence that single mother parent-child relationships are
characterised by greater equality, more frequent interaction, more
discussion, and greater intimacy and companionship--especially with
older children who are more in touch with a parent's emotional
state (Arditti, 1999a: 116)
The long-term effects of this are incontrovertible in the
literature--separated custodial mothers have closer relationships, into
adulthood, with their children than fathers do (Amato, 2000; Aquilino,
1994, Emery, 1999; Kruk, 1994, Wallerstein, 1980, 1990, 2000) and the
data from this study support this contention.
It is important to note that it is a common pattern in discussions
of post-separation life to use relatively blunt instruments where the
characteristics of adult children with separated parents are ranged
against those from intact families, where single mothers'
relationships with their children are ranged against their married
counterparts, and so on. Inherent in such a matrix is a strong sense of
deficit where single mothers are consistently 'normed' against
others and found wanting (Arditti, 1999a: 118). Paterson (2001) takes
this further by suggesting that explorations of the success of single
parenting challenge the ideology of the nuclear family itself and are
consequently both truncated and undermined (p. 19).
Whilst both of these positions concur with the understanding that
single mothers have closer relationships with their children than other
family formations, and that these bonds are initiated in the six to
twelve months after separation (Kruk, 1994) there is disagreement about
whether or not this is advantageous. It is not the intention here to
contribute to that debate, but rather to explore the perceptions of this
by the adult children of separated parents. In doing so, it is
imperative to note that the data presented are memories and that this
generates two methodological considerations.
Firstly, as Rice points out:
The orthodox way to pursue knowledge is, of course, to look for
explanatory, measurable phenomena and a legal divorce provides a
convenient marker event for a linear analysis. A different analysis
would proceed from a social production model. Such a
conceptualisation invites, creates and shapes new life narrative
paradigms for women, men and their children and families that are
multiple and non-linear (p. 579).
This approach requires new non-linear ways of thinking about time,
about consequences, about determination and perhaps most importantly,
the agency of individuals.
Secondly, when exploring memories of the past it is necessary to
acknowledge that history is inevitably reinvented, or at the very least
reworked, by the individual in order to add perspicacity to their
contemporary perceptions. As Arditti (1999b) argues, the
'children's later description may not reflect the way it was
experienced then, but how it feels to them in the present' (p.
117). This caveat does not detract from an individual's account of
what happened in the past and how they felt about it, but, conversely,
can assist in the enrichment of the exploration of an adult child of
separation's perceptions of the links between the present and the
past. Such an exploration, which deals with the relationship between
separated mothers and their children, from the point of view of the
adult children is rare in the literature (see Wallerstein, 2000),
largely because it is only recently that the children from the divorces
of the 1970s have been in a position to look back on them as adults.
The participants in the study under consideration below differ from
those in other studies in their perceptions of their relationships with
their mothers. Although they may be intimate with their mothers, far
from having experiences of closeness, of support and availability and
feeling that their mothers were their 'best friends' (Arditti,
1999a), they described them as angry, bitter, depressed and, more
generally, as 'having issues'.
The Generation X Project
This project examined the impact of living in a post divorce
society on those raised in the post Family Law Act (1975) era who were
themselves raised by separated parents. The aim of the study, conducted
in 2003, was to explore the ways in which maturing during that time, and
growing up in more than one family, has had an impact on the ways in
which these individuals understand themselves (see Hughes, 2005). Now
aged between thirty and forty-six, Generation X was the first cohort to
have witnessed substantial numbers of divorces amongst their
parents' generation and been raised in non-conventional families in
large numbers (3). The target sample for participants were members of
'Generation X' (4), whose parents separated before they were
twenty.
Thirty participants were selected: fifteen men and fifteen women
who lived in suburban Melbourne. Chain-referral was used for recruitment
because the cohort of interest was deemed 'hard to reach' by
conventional sampling methods (Penrod et al., 2003).The initial
participant was recruited via an acquaintance of the research assistant.
Sample screening was conducted over the phone and by email when
interested participants contacted the author or the Research Assistant.
Following the interview with each included participant, as is standard
in snowball sampling, they were in turn asked to recommend another
(Adriaans, 1992; Biernacki and Walkdorf, 1981). This method generated an
ethnically and sexually diverse sample in which each interviewee knew
only one other. They had all experienced single parent, step, or blended
families. Most had occupations which were either professional or
associate professional (5). All were interviewed for between one and two
hours, in their workplace or their home.
In-depth, semi-structured, interviews were used in the project with
open-ended questions designed to enable the participant to direct the
focus of the interview as much as possible such as 'Can you tell me
a little about the families you were brought up in?', 'What
was it like when your parents separated?', 'Do you think the
choices you have made about your relationships have been influenced by
your parents' experiences?'. The interviews, conducted by a
research assistant, were audio-recorded, transcribed and coded. The data
was analysed using Strauss and Corbin's (1998) open coding where
'concepts are identified and their properties and dimensions are
discovered in data' (p. 101). This method yielded nine initial
codes (consistent thematic clusters): economic and financial issues,
general social issues, relationships with parents, the separation, wider
family relationships, transition to adulthood, emotional and mental
health issues, perspectives on relationships in general and having
children. These were then broken down into forty eight sub-codes (Bogdan
and Biklen, 1992; Minichiello et al, 1995).
Data about relationships with mothers was not prompted during the
interviews but during content analysis, it emerged as a key theme as
participant after participant, (particularly females) returned to the
way they made sense of their mothers from the point of family breakdown
onwards. One of the interesting findings from the Generation X project
was the participants' ambivalent feelings towards their mothers. It
became clear that as the impact of separation was unpacked, there was a
sense that their mothers were damaged by the separation, and that this
damage was long-term and, in turn, damaging.
The findings are consecutively ordered starting from the period
immediately post-separation, followed by their sense of their mothers a
few years
after the family breakdown and the section concludes with the
participants' perceptions of their mothers today. This method is
used in order to give a sense of the evolution of the participants'
perceptions of their mothers as they move from child to adult. A
discussion of these findings follows.
'It was awful for her, absolutely awful ...'
The participants first volunteered information about their mothers
in the section of the interview which dealt with their feelings about
their parents' separation at the time it happened. With the
exception of one (Lola) they had all lived with their mothers.
For the most part, and perhaps unsurprisingly given their living
arrangements, they saw their mothers--unlike their fathers--as being
quite distressed by the end of their relationship. Words such as
'hurt', 'bitter', 'angry',
'scarred', 'humiliated' (and their synonyms) are
used in almost all the interviews, and this is even more the case when
the separation was initiated by the father. Fifteen of the thirty
participants (four men and eleven women) spoke in some detail about
their mothers' post-separation emotions and it is these accounts
which are discussed here.
Ben's (6) fatherleft his mother after thirty years, having
remained together 'for the sake of the children'. At the time
of the interview Ben was forty one, and a Journalist:
My mother was incredibly bitter and angry and hurt and diminished
by the whole thing, feeling that she'd been made a laughing stock.
Similarly, Jackie's parents remained in a marriage which she,
in hindsight, sees as having run out of steam. Like Ben, Jackie's
parents finally separated when the children had left home.
Today Jackie is thirty six and is a Social Worker:
... it [emotion] was just absent, it was reflective of their
marriage. Mum was deeply hurt.
Lola's parents parted when she was two and her younger brother
was eight months old and still being breastfed. Her father won custody
of the two children. Currently, Lola is thirty and the owner of a small
business:
Yeah, it was awful for her, absolutely awful and it's scarred her
and it effects how she has relationships with everyone
Kelly prefaces her comments about her mother with 'I think Mum
and I have a personality clash, a major personality clash'. She was
ten when her parents separated, at her mother's instigation. Kelly
felt very damaged by her parents' split and its aftermath. She is
forty, and a High School teacher:
I think I do blame her more, though if I think about it rationally
I know my Dad is at least as much to blame. Certainly, logically, I
look back on the time and I think she did everything she could to
provide for us. Like she never told us Dad didn't pay maintenance
until much later, although she did tell us. But I mean still, at
least she kept the promise at the time.
When the interview took place, Zenzi was thirty one and working as
a Research Officer for a trade union. Like Kelly, she was in the middle
of her childhood when her parents separated--she was eight. Her father
remained active in Zenzi's life (unlike most of the other fathers
who became increasingly distant) which led to bifurcated allegiances as
she tried to cope with her mother's depression (see Buchanan,
Maccoby and Dornbusch, 1991):
Our house became just like a place of grieving, you had to be
really careful of things, not to step ... it was like treading on
egg shells a bit, to doing a lot to make life as easy as it could
be for Mum, to being fairly quiet and fairly helpful as I could be
... On the one hand I'm still a lot closer to my Dad, but I was so
shocked by what he had done to my Mum, to watch someone go through
so much pain and you know what the cause of that pain is, so there
would be funny sense of split allegiances
'Look, get over it'.
Memories of the months following the separation appear to be less
vivid than those of the subsequent years. For the most part, the
interviewees remark upon both the length of time of the aftermath of the
separation, and the intensity of the associated pain for some mothers.
This is consistent with other studies which report that custodial
mothers, in particular, tend towards solipsism and depression
(Hetherington, 1991). For some, the anger has only marginally subsided
today--many years later--and can still erupt under certain
circumstances. Roughly half of the mothers remained single.
Here Ben gives an example of the timeline for his mother's
feelings, and of their re-emergence. Ben both dislikes it and
understands it:
So I would say the real bitterness in Mum lasted at least ten years
and then about ten years ago, she met her current partner who is a
woman and since then, the bitterness has eased. But at the time of
my father's funeral it all came out again. She behaved quite
atrociously, really, during my father's funeral and it was because
it raised for her all sorts of issues about abandonment and things
like that and the hurt that she felt then and why she had been made
to feel second best or discarded and all those things that she
genuinely felt.
In a similar vein, Senna reports on both the longevity and
intensity of her mother's feelings which persist today. Senna was
seven when her parents separated and she rarely saw her father
afterwards. Today she is thirty one and works as a Program Manager for
an international development agency:
I really hate it, but my mother in my experience is not emotionally
intelligent, she's not able to reconcile or she's not able to
resolve or let go of things emotionally for her. It's been the same
for twenty five years. I haven't seen any level of forgiveness or
resolution in twenty five years. She's not just an angry woman
constantly, she has her moments, she's quite a sweet woman, quite
softly spoken and quite gentle. But at times I see her in rampages
and rages and it's the same level of anger and hate for my father
and a need for some sort of compensation from him. And I think she
desperately wanted to go back to Japan and take him to Japan
because I guess, what she claims is in Japan, if you divorce, the
financial and social implications for people particularly for
fathers who leave families, is huge. And she would really like to
see him suffer all those kinds of things.
Like Senna, Susan's mother has retained a high level of anger.
This may have been augmented by the fact that both women were
migrants--Susan's parents came from the Philippines--and the
separation caused much more social isolation than for those born in
Australia. In Susan's case, this has led to a softening of her
mother's resentment as she ages and becomes more reliant on Susan,
Susan's brother and her grandchildren. Susan is thirty five and a
tutor at a university:
Because it was so difficult for her and she's such a difficult
person to talk to and to deal with perhaps that's why she's made my
brother's life and my life difficult because she had no other focus
because we were both living away from home. I just saw her as quite
angry, very angry and I think Jim my brother and I got to the stage
where we were telling her 'Look, get over it'. I don't think she's
as angry but I think she realizes that perhaps I'm the only thing
she has now and her grandchildren so she has mellowed and she's
compromised with me on a few things.
Finally, Zenzi points to the relative impact the separation had on
her mother and father. Her father remarried, like all but two of the
fathers. Implicit in Zenzi's account, like the others whose mothers
remained single and fathers did not, she believes that it was her mother
who was the more damaged:
Apart from grieving very heavily for a long time, I mean I think
the circumstances in which my Dad left were awful because there was
a pretty significant betrayal there by two people extremely close
to her, one being my Dad and the other person being her closest
friend. Mum had loved my Dad so much so basically there was just a
broken heart there for a really long time and my sister and I
speculate even today, because even though she's moved on and she's
done other things, the impact of that upon her life I think has
been a lot greater than for my Dad.
'She's challenging'
This section deals with the ways in which the participants discuss
their mothers as they are today, but more particularly, they look at
their mothers' personalties and offer relatively similar typologies
of their mothers as 'having issues' and being inarticulate about emotions. There is an interesting shift from child to adult in
these accounts where they discuss their parent from a mature perspective
and simultaneously show understanding for them.
Bert, a forty year old Social Worker, was fourteen when his parents
separated. Throughout his interview he comments on his mother's
psychological health--both at the time of separation and later--arguing
that she was unwell:
I don't know, Mum's had her own issues and to this day it effects
everything.
Similarly, Kelly, Cibylle and Susan here make statements about
their perceptions of their mothers' emotional wellbeing:
Kelly: I hate to say it but she's a bit mad and that's a
subjective thing to say but many people agree with me. I also feel bad
about it now that she is a bit crazy. She always was a bit crazy.
Eccentric maybe is a nicer way of saying it.
Cibylle: She's emotionally closed and doesn't deal with
anything on an emotional level whatsoever and I don't necessarily
think she's that exciting on a conversational level.
Susan: She's just a very difficult person. She's
challenging. I think everything that has happened in her life. Words
that come to mind is she can be aggressive, dogmatic, generally
difficult, but I think she's starting to mellow.
Tim, whose parents separated when he was seven and is now a thirty
one year old Remedial Masseur, has no contact with his mother at all. He
felt she abandoned him and his brothers after the separation by living
with men they didn't like. He asks 'How can a mother choose
someone else over her own kids?' But, as becomes clear, he
introduces the notion of having an adult understanding of his mother:
She's a very selfish woman. I mean the reason my parents split up
was because she had an affair and then took my father for
everything he had ... So I won't have contact with her again unless
she rings and apologises. I can't see her doing that. So to me, I
have accepted that and that really doesn't bother me to be honest
... I don't think she's right herself. She's got her own issues
which she obviously hasn't dealt with.
The issue of 'issues' appears again in Xena's
interview. Here she looks further into the past than the separation for
insight into her mother's character. Xena is an Office
Co-ordinator, and thirty six:
She's got issues. She had a traumatic relationship with her mother.
Her mother was very emotional and used emotional blackmail a lot
and there were issues there and I think when her mother died, she
hadn't resolved them, still hasn't to this day and doesn't have a
chance to now. I think she didn't have a happy childhood ... I
wouldn't say she's a very happy person generally.
Louise's father left when she was ten and she rarely saw him
after that. Now she is forty one and a Radio Dispatcher for emergency
services. Having suffered severe depression for most of her adult life,
she uses this experience as a lens through which to see her
mother's behaviour when she was a child:
She had her set of opinions and her version always won. But I can
see in hindsight that was because she was stressed, she was a
single mother with four kids under the age of ten and she didn't
necessarily have time to listen to us and she suffered from
depression herself. So I'm much more forgiving of her now.
Like Louise, Lola looks to her mother's post-separation
experiences for insight into their relationship. But Lola is also
interested in her mother's role as a grandmother and believes that
it is predicated on the loss of her own children:
She's emotionally distant. She's much better with the twins now as
they're a bit older, but when they were younger, she was very stand
offish and you can see there's still an element of keeping her
distance I suppose, but the pain of having your children taken
away, especially when one of them is breastfeeding, leaves such a
mark on you that you really wouldn't want to get attached.
Finally, Zenzi positions herself as a mature, sexually experienced
woman and empathises strongly with her mother's pain when she lost
her husband to her close friend. Like Lola, above, these women's
own experiences as mothers and partners have led them to an
understanding of their mothers in a way which eludes others:
I think having had relationships I see it differently, in that I
feel a lot, lot more for my mother you know, and I think that's
because you just put yourself in someone's else position and try to
imagine what that would have been like and I think it would have
been horrible. Because I think, also from that generation, that
there was just that real sense of humiliation.
'I've had to mother her'.
In this final section, the project's data dealing with role
reversal and role diffusion are dealt with. An exploration of the links
between this and the participants' accounts of their changing
relationships with their mothers appears in the discussion.
Briefly, role reversal is defined here as the undertaking of a
role, or task, which is normally undertaken by another family member. In
particular, it refers to the situation where a child (of whatever age)
undertakes an executive function, involving tasks which parents are
conventionally expected to undertake, and the parent, in turn, adopts a
more passive position in the relationship. It is, indeed, a reversal of
roles. The participants in this study widely report such a reversal
occurring.
In this first example, Bert is discussing the factors which led to
his leaving school in Year Ten--an event he now feels some bitterness
about. Foremost amongst these factors was his father's absence
which led to a dissolution of a structural framework which would have
kept him at school (see Amato, 1991; Beck-Gernsheim, 2001; Hines, 1997;
King, 2002; Seltzer, 1991; Wallerstein, 2000), and a concomitant responsibility to maintain the running of the household:
But Dad wasn't around ... there's that discipline, to make sure
that I got to school and I think that was the biggest thing and
also the fact there was so much to do in the home that it'd give me
a good excuse not to go to school.
Bert was fourteen when the separation came and Helen was
twelve--arguably ages at which adult responsibilities can be undertaken
by children. Like Bert, Helen also feels she underachieved at school,
chiefly because her domestic responsibilities were large. Helen (41) has
five brothers and sisters:
I was running the house and I was the first one to get a license so
it was Dad and me who would run the kids to school, I would pick up
the hay for the animals and have to hang around until my sister
finished TAFE, all this sort of stuff.
Louise and Zenzi argue that at the point of separation their
responsibilities grew immediately, that they were 'too
serious' (in Louise's words). Interestingly, both then
describe the period of their twenties as a time when they recouped their
lost freedom:
Zenzi: I think just in terms of a childhood, my childhood just
ended, just BANG and I had to take a role, I had to assume a lot more
responsibility and that has effects. Like I think into my twenties, that
meant that when I left home--and I left pretty young--this was my life
now, my time. And I think this led to an incredible hedonistic period
which maybe I'm only just exiting. I was sort of out of it (7).
Louise: I probably took on a lot more responsibility. I mean in
hindsight I became too serious at too early an age and didn't run
riot in my teen years as I probably should have. I probably did that
later in my 20s.
Eleven when her parents parted, Alix spent her adolescence in a
blended family with eight children--two siblings, four step-siblings and
one half sibling. Currently employed as administrative worker whilst
undertaking a law degree, she is thirty one. Here her comments reflect
the the feelings of many of the participants:
We weren't the parents and it wasn't our job ... we don't feel we
were very effectively parented at all, by any parents, at any time.
We feel it now--we were often the grown ups.
The sense of effectively being the grown ups is also a central
issue for role diffusion. Here, roles are blurred rather than simply
reversed and it relates particularly to emotional issues where a child
(again, of what ever age) offers the parent emotional support. Arditti
(1999a) argues that such support is not necessarily unreciprocated nor
is it necessarily inappropriate or disadvantageous for the child. In
this study, reciprocity is not discussed by the participants.
Here Ben, for example, is discussing his mother in the context of
the immediate post-separation period. Without knowing this, one might
guess it was a father speaking of his daughter:
She was so angry and hurt and vulnerable and unbearable. She took a
lot of work for a long time. She needed a lot of confirmation and
attention. She was fragile.
Susan similarly, articulates role diffusion in terms of her playing
mother to her mother:
It was probably a little bit more difficult with my mother but I
guess it's because of what's been going on in her life. I've had to
mother her.
At twenty, Gail was one of the eldest when her parents finally
separated after a long and troubled relationship. She is thirty six and
is employed as an Office Administrator. Here she positions herself as
her mother's 'counsellor':
But I remember very clearly, and my sister will talk about it
until the cows come home, about me being my Mum's counsellor.
Mum would talk to me often about her dissatisfaction, unhappiness
and that sort of thing.
Similarly, Mark's mother sought the friendship of her son, and
explicitly attempted to reject having a role as his mother. But Mark, in
turn, would not let her. He is thirty eight now, works as a nurse and is
studying law part-time:
As a late teenager and in my early twenties, I put it to her that
she didn't have the option [not to have a mother/son relationship]
... but she would say 'I don't look upon you as a son, I look on
you as a friend'. And I said 'I'm not satisfied with that because
I'm not your friend, I'm your son!' ... Later on, when I was in my
late twenties, I went to her with my list of questions and said
'This is what I want to know about, what happened when I was a
kid? 'Why did you do this and what was your motivation?' And
ultimately I was satisfied with her account and found it from
the goodness in my heart, the capacity to forgive her. Because
I really believe that she did things that she had to be forgiven
for--or alternatively not be forgiven for.
Discussion
At first glance, the data from the Generation X project appears
surprising for two main reasons.
Firstly, unlike other studies (undertaken with older children
rather than adult children) (see Aquilino, 1994; Arditti, 1999a;
Paterson, 2001; King, 2002) the participants do not report strong
feelings of warmth towards their mothers. On the contrary, they almost
unanimously, and spontaneously, expressed a number of negative feelings.
In some cases, this was tempered by a sense of understanding and empathy
for what their mothers had endured.
Secondly, the majority of interviewees approached the issue of
their mothers almost as if they were therapists and their mothers were
their clients. In this dyad there is a sense of division and analysis as
they discussed the experiences which came to shape their mothers'
characters.
There are three points to be made about this. The first is
observational and the others are explanatory.
Firstly, the levels of intimacy expressed by the participants in
relation to their mothers is consistent with other studies (see Arditti,
1999a, 1999b, Arditti and Madden-Derdich, 1997; Paterson, 2001). This
level of intimacy can be 'determined by the level of commitment and
positive affective, cognitive, and physical closeness' (Moss and
Schwebel, 1993: 33) and for the most part it is the case that the data
in this study show a commitment between mother and child (with the
exception of Tim), a positive affective and cognitive closeness (in
other words the mother and child know and feel a great deal about one
another) and are physically close (this is more difficult to ascertain
given that the data covers the period from childhood to adulthood but,
in the main, such closeness is evident). Yet the difference in this
study is not the strength or depth of the feelings but that they are so
critical of their mothers--particularly of their mothers' anger and
the longevity of their hostile feelings about the separation: they
should have 'moved on' (8).
Secondly, how might these intense, sometimes negative feelings for
their mothers be accounted for? One possibility lies in two linked
issues touched upon earlier: role reversal and role diffusion. Johnston
(1990) argues that reversal occurs when a child effectively replaces the
absent partner in terms of decision making processes and performing
tasks more normally undertaken by a parent. Role diffusion involves a
similar dynamic of usurpation but involves a situation where
'parents and children act unilaterally in terms of their own
needs' (Johnston, 1990: 411). In such a context, the children are
often used to meet the parents' emotional needs which include such
things as psychological support, offering comfort if the parent is
upset, listening to the parent discuss their ex-partner and relieving
loneliness. It is not my intention to offer a precise delineation of
these two dynamics in the context of this project, but to suggest that
the participants argued that they did, indeed, undertake adult tasks and
offer emotional support to their mothers.
Given this, it is possible to argue that the power relationships
between mother and child are, at the very least, altered. The child
feels able to offer an analysis of their mother's personality and
behaviour--with varying degrees of warmth and empathy. It may also be
the case that there is some degree of resentment that the roles of
mother and child have been compromised. This resentment issues from both
the truncation of childhood, and the support they felt obliged to
deliver to their parents.
Thirdly, it seems to me that the participants' feelings
towards their mothers can also be accounted for by exploring the
emotional culture of their generation in the same way that they
themselves account for their parents feelings and behaviour in terms of
their generation. Generation X matured in a culture where marriages were
easily ended for the first time in history, divorce was relatively
common and there was little stigma attached to both. As a corollary,
they are sceptical about the possibility of staying with a partner, and
cynical about the value of the family per se (see Hughes, 2005). In
contast, the expectations of their parents' generation were that
marriages simply continued unless a spouse deserted, committed adultery or was cruel. As is clear from the data, the participants argue that the
longevity of their mothers' feelings of loss, humiliation and
disappointment can be explained by their expectations that marriages
would, simply, last.
There is little doubt that all familial relationships underwent a
fundamental change in the last half of the twentieth century (Beck and
Beck-Gernsheim, 1995; Beck-Gernsheim, 2001) with a partial dissolution
of the old community and family concerns, and duty and obligations
between individuals. These have been replaced by notions of
individualism (characterised by the drive for self-improvement and an
overwhelming self-absorption), self-actualisation, contingency and of
individuals as conscious agents of change of themselves and of their
relationships with others (Hughes, 2005). Whilst it is not surprising
that such dynamics have become integral to sexual relationships, it is
interesting that they appear to shape biological relationships also.
The focus of the project under consideration here is Generation X
(rather than their parents) and the data drawn from the project is
uncontrovertible: the participants have a strong belief that their
relationships with their mothers (like all other relationships) are
malleable, are about growth and, ultimately, about self-actualisation. A
key concern in this context is the balance between this impulse, and the
sense of filial duty which previously shaped the behaviour of adult
children and their aging parents. As Wells and Johnson (2001) point out,
separated fathers are the least likely to receive care from their
children as they age--a result of their lack of contact with their
children. But as the traditional sense of duty on the part of adult
children wanes, replaced by a sense of frustration, separated mothers
may well become vulnerable too.
Conclusion
There is no doubt that we are approaching an era in which
generational expectations will become a vexed issue. This is partly due
to the large numbers of the 'baby boomer' generation who are
drawing near to retirement and old age. This was the generation who led
the divorce revolution in the 1970s and raised their children in
multifarious homes. In doing so, they reshaped the familial roles which
had dominated their own parents' lives in the post-war era.
Their children are currently in the process of negotiating their
own relationships with their parents--a process which appears to be
marked less by roles. Given that they have grown up in an era where
relationships are negotiable (and almost certainly temporary) it is
perhaps inevitable that they should approach their parents with the
sense of contingency expressed by the participants in this study. The
desire for personal autonomy and the dependence of parents on their
children (which is founded on an older model of obligations) generates a
set of conflicting impulses. For the adult children of separation, these
contradictions are heightened because they feel their growth towards
autonomy has been truncated by family demands, and by their
mothers' dependence on them. This dependence was forged by a
traditional sense of entitlement which contemporary adult children feel
less bound to than previous generations may have been. It is these
frictions that generate the participants' perceptions of their
mothers as needy, vulnerable and demanding.
Although the study is small and does not claim to be
representative, the participants have pointed to a shift in the ways
parents and adult children regard one another--a context where
biological relationships become open to negotiation in new ways. In the
case of the many thousands of separated parents who may soon rely on the
assistance of their children (regardless of the quality of their
relationship) as they age, their disparate expectations of care giving
may be problematic. Where there is an enlivened public debate, and some
considerable anxiety, about the wellbeing of older Australians, some
further exploration of these dynamics seems opportune.
References
Adriaans, N. F. P.(1992) 'The Practice of Snowballing',
in V.M. Hendricks, P. Blanken and N.F.P. Adriaans (eds) Snowball
Sampling: A Pilot Study on Cocaine Use, Rotterdam: IVO Publishing.
Amato, P. (2000) 'The Consequences of Divorce for Adults and
Children', Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62 (4) 1269-88.
Amato, P. R. (2003) 'Reconciling Divergent Perspectives:
Judith Wallerstein, Qualitative Family Research and Children of
Divorce', Family Relations, 52 (4) 332-9.
Amato, P. and Keith, B. (1991) 'Parental Divorce and Adult
Wellbeing: A Meta-Analysis', Journal of Marriage and the Family 53,
59-69.
Aquilino, W. S. (1994) 'Impact of Childhood Family Disruption
on Young Adults' Relationships with Parents', Journal of
Marriage and the Family, 56 (2) 295-314.
Arditti, J. A. (1999a) 'Rethinking Relationships Between
Divorced Mothers and their Children: Capitalising on Family
Strengths', Family Relationships, 48 (2) 109-120.
Arditti, J. A. (1999b) 'Parental Divorce and Young
Adults' Intimate Relationships: Towards a New Paradigm',
Marriage and Family Review, 29, (1) 35-56.
Arditti, J. A. and D. Madden-Derdich (1997) 'Joint and Sole
Custody Mothers: Implications for Research and Practice', Families
in Society, 78 (1) 36-46.
Australian Bureau of Statistics (1996) Australian Standard
Classification of Occupations, Second Edition (Cat. no. 1220.0).
Australian Parliament House of Representatives Standing Committee
on Family and Community Affairs (2003) Every picture tells a story :
report on the inquiry into child custody arrangements in the event of
family separation Canberra, Commonwealth of Australia.
Australian Parliament House of Representatives Standing Committee
on Legal and Constitutional Affairs (2005) Report on the exposure draft
of the Family Law Amendment (Shared Parental Responsibility) Bill 2005,
Canberra, Commonwealth of Australia.
Beck, U. and Beck-Gernsheim, E. (1995) The Normal Chaos of Love,
Cambridge, Polity Press.
Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2001) Reinventing the Family. In Search of New
Lifestyles, London, Polity Press.
Bianchi, S. M. (2006) 'Mothers and Daughters "Do",
Fathers "Don't Do" Family: Gender and Generational
Bonds', Journal of Marriage and Family, 68 812-816.
Biernacki, P. and D. Waldorf (1981) 'Snowball Sampling:
Problem and Techniques of Chain Referral Sampling', Sociological
Methods and Research 10 (2): 141-63.
Bogdan, R.C. and S.K. Biklen (1992) Qualitative Research in
Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods, Sydney, Allen and
Unwin.
Buchanan, C. M., E. E. Maccoby and S. M. Dornbusch (1991)
'Caught Between Parents: Adolescents Experience in Divorced
Homes', Child Development, 62, 1008-1029.
Emery, R. E. (1999) 'Postdivorce Family Life for Children: An
Overview of Research and Some Implications for Policy' in R. A.
Thompson and P. R. Amato The Postdivorce Family. Children, Parenting and
Society, Thousand Oaks, California, Sage.
Emery, R.E., L. Laumann-Billings, M. Waldron, D. A. Sbarra, and P.
Dillon (2001). 'Child custody mediation and litigation: Custody,
contact, and co-parenting 12 years after initial dispute
resolution', Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69,
323-332.
Gahler, M. (1998) 'Self-Reported Wellbeing Among Adult
Children of Divorce in Sweden', Acta Sociologica, 41 (3) 209-226.
Giddens, A. (1992) The Transformation of Intimacy. Sexuality, Love
and Eroticism in Modern Societies, Cambridge, Polity Press.
Hallie, F. (2007) 'Young Adults' Relationship with
Parents and Siblings: The Role of Marital Status, Conflict and
Post-Divorce Predictors', Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 46
(3/4) 105-24
Hetherington, E. M. (1991) 'The Role of Individual Differences
and Family Relationships in Children's Coping with Divorce and
Remarriage' in P. A. Cowen and M. Hetherington (eds) Family
Transitions, Hillsdale, New Jersey, Erlbaum.
Hines, A. M (1997) 'Divorce-Related Transitions, Adolescent
Development and the Role of the Parent-Child Relationship', Journal
of Marriage and the Family, 59 (2) 375-89.
Hughes, K. (2005) 'The Adult Children of Divorce: Pure
Relationships and Family Values?' Journal of Sociology, 41 (1)
69-86.
Johnston, J. R. (1990) 'Role Diffusion and Role Reversal:
Structural Variations in Divorced Families and Children's
Functioning', Family Relations, 39 (4) 405-414.
Jordan, P. (1996) The Effects of Marital Separation on Men--10
Years On, Family Court of Australia, Research Report No 14.
King, V. (2002) 'Parental Divorce and Interpersonal Trust in
Adult Offspring', Journal of Marriage and the Family, 64 (3)
642-57.
Kruk, E. (1994) 'The Disengaged Noncustodial
Father--Implications for Social Work Practice with the Divorced
Family', Social Work, 39 (1) 15-26.
Minichiello, V., R. Aroni, E. Timewell and L. Alexander (1995)
In-Depth Interviewing: Researching People, Melbourne, Longmans.
Moss, B. F. and A. I. Schwebel (1993) 'Marriage and Romantic
Relationships: Defining Intimacy in Romantic Relationships' Family
Relations, 42 (1) 31-37.
Neale, B. (2001) 'Family Values: Children's Reflections
on Post-Divorce Family Life', Childrenz Issues: Journal of the
Children's Issues Centre, University of Otago, NZ, Spring.
Nicholls, W.J. and L. T. Pike (2002) 'Contact Fathers'
Experience of Family Life', Journal of Family Studies, 8, (1)
74-90.
Penrod, J., D. B. Preston, K. E. Cain and M.T. Starks (2003)
'A Discussion of Chain Referral as a Method of Sampling Hard to
Reach Populations', Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 14 (2):
100-8.
Raschick, M and Ingersoll-Dayton, B. (2004) The Costs and Rewards
of Caregiving Among Aging Spouses and Adult Children', Family
Relations, 53, 317-325.
Rice, J. (1994) 'Reconsidering Research on Divorce, Family
Life Cycle and the Meaning of Family', Psychology of Women
Quarterly, 18, (4) 559-84.
Seltzer, J. A. (1991) 'Relationships Between Fathers and
Children Who live Apart: The Father's Role After Separation',
Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53 (1) 79-101.
Smart, C. and B. Neale (2001) The Changing Experience of Childhood:
Families and Divorce, Cambridge, Polity Press.
Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research:
Techniqies and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, Thousand Oaks,
Sage.
Wallerstein, J. S. and J. B. Kelly (1980) Surviving the Breakup:
How Children and Parents Cope with Divorce, New York, Basic Books.
Wallerstein, J. S and S. Blakesless (1990) Second Chances. Men,
Women and Children a Decade After Divorce, New York, Tickman and Fields.
Wallerstein, J. S. (2000) The Unexpected Legacy of Divorce: A
25-Year Landmark Study, New York, Hyperion.
Webster, P. S. and Orbuch, T. L. (1995) 'Effects of Childhood
Family Background on Adult Marital Quality and Perceived
Stability', American Journal of Sociology, 101 (2) 404-32.
Wells, Y. D. and Johnson, T. M. (2001) 'Impact of Parental
Divorce on Willingness of Young Adults to Provide Care for Parents in
the Future', Journal of Family Studies 7 (2) 160-70.
Willson, A. E. Shuey, K. M., Elder Jr., GH. (2003)
'Ambivalence in the Relationship of Adult Children to Aging Parents
and In-Laws', Journal of Marriage & Family; 65 (4) 1055-1072.
Willson, A. E., Shuey, K. M., Elder Jr., G. H., Wickrama,
K.A.S.(2006) 'Ambivalence in Mother-Adult Child Relations: A Dyadic Analysis', Social Psychology Quarterly; 69 (3) 235-252.
(1) I am using the term separation to denote the end of a
relationship. It thus incorporates both legal and defacto marriages, and
points to the reconfiguration of a set of family relationships rather
than the legal termination of a marriage.
(2) I have adapted Moss and Schwebel's (1993) definition of
intimacy in order to apply it to the parent/ child relationship and see
it as 'determined by the level of commitment and positive
affective, cognitive, and physical closeness' (p.33).
(3) At the time of their parents' divorce, there was very
little support available for parents or their children in terms of
mediation or counselling which may well account for the heightened
levels of emotion still apparent in the participants in this study.
(4) Born between 1961 (the year the contraceptive pill came on the
market in Australia), and 1976 (the year the Family Law Act was enacted)
(5) I have used the Australian Standard Classification of
Occupations (ABS, 1996) to categorise their occupations in this way.
(6) Pseudonyms are used throughout to protect the
participants' identity
(7) Another unexpected theme in the data was the problematic use of
drugs and alcohol by the participants.
(8) The Jordan Report (1996) which explored the responses of men to
their divorce over time suggests that men were equally as disturbed and
that their feelings of anger with their ex-partner tended to rise rather
than decrease over a ten year span.