Determinants of home atmosphere in English football: a committed supporter perspective.
Charleston, Stephanie
A consistent home advantage has been established across
professional sports (e.g. Carron, Loughhead, & Bray, 2005; Courneya
& Carron, 1992; Dowie, 1982; Nevill & Holder, 1999; Sutter &
Kocher, 2004). The crowd was identified as the primary contributor to it
(Neville & Holder, 1999), with the highest prevalence in football
(soccer) (Courneya & Carron, 1992; Nevill, Newell, & Gale, 1996;
Pollard, 1986; 2006a; 2006b). This increased advantage in football has
been associated with the noise levels produced by the crowd, absolute
crowd size, and crowd density (Agnew & Carron, 1994; Nevill, Balmer
& Williams, 2002; Nevill, Newell & Gale, 1996; Pollard &
Pollard, 2005; Schwartz & Barsky, 1977; Smith, 2003). Yet there is
some mixed evidence for the crowd's influence. Dowie (1982) found
little difference in home advantage across 4 English football leagues,
despite considerable variability in crowd size. He implied it was not
simply crowd size, for example, which impacted advantage; rather it was
the relative balance of support between the two teams. This suggests the
importance of the social interchange between groups of fans also has an
impact. Pollard (1986) further strengthened this claim in a study of
competitions from the English professional leagues from 1970-1981. At
that time, partisan crowd size at matches between rivals of close
proximity, known as local derbies, was approximately equal. Although
home advantage was maintained, it was significantly lower at derby
matches than those where the majority of crowd members supported the
home team.
We may not know specifically how it impacts home advantage; but
there is the perception that the crowd does influence the competitive
outcome. According to supporters of English professional football clubs,
their presence was the most important factor in home advantage and they
felt accountable when the team lost if they were not in attendance
(Wolfson, Wakelin, & Lewis, 2005). Additionally, 80% agreed with the
statement 'home teams that fail to respond to the crowd's
support will not perform well' (p. 371). Melnick (1993) summarised
this with the statement, 'spectators share the collective knowledge
that they are vital and integral to the action' (p. 50). Anecdotal references in post-match interviews to a 12th man (the crowd) affecting
the outcome imply this view is shared by the players and coaches alike;
and research has confirmed this to be the case (Gayton, Broida, &
Elgee, 2001; Thirer & Rampey, 1979; Waters & Lovell, 2002).
Professional football, like other sports, has become increasingly
commercialised over the past several decades. It is viewed as a money
making enterprise, which attracts investors for its potential across an
international market. Therefore, maintaining the loyalty of the crowd is
essential to team success both because of the importance placed on the
crowd's psychological contribution to home advantage, and the fact
that sport fandom has become more commercialised (Guilianotti, 2002).
When expectations were not fulfilled, members of the crowd left earlier
from the event (Wakefield & Sloan, 1995), and even withheld support
through nonattendance (Funk, Ridinger & Moorman, 2004; Madrigal,
1995). In some instances fans can turn against the team and negatively
effect player psychological states (Waters & Lovell, 2002). The
cumulative result of fan dissatisfaction can be income reduction through
diminished gate receipts, sales of food, merchandising losses, and
difficulty in attracting corporate sponsorships; which can have a
knock-on effect for the financial reserve necessary to purchase the best
players or build the facilities to ensure the highest probability of
team success. However, to maximise the benefits that a crowd may
provide, it is important to understand what it wants from attendance.
Van Leeuwen, Quick and Daniel (2002) proposed a Sport Spectator Satisfaction Model (SSSM) which built on traditional sports marketing models by the addition of win/loss factor. Using the Disconfirmation of
Expectations Model, they theorised higher levels of satisfaction would
be related to positive disconfirmation (i.e. doing better than expected)
in regards to the likelihood of a win/loss and perceived performance.
Borland and Macdonald (2003) substantiated this with further evidence
that higher quality matches increased attendance across sports. Fans at
collegiate sporting events in the US reported the competition itself
(e.g. game quality and outcome) to be most important to the quality of
their experience (Kelley & Turley, 2001; Wann & Wilson, 1999).
Madrigal (1995) found that higher overall attendance satisfaction
ratings for women's collegiate basketball games were indirectly
related to expectancy disconfirmation and opponent quality. Fans of
English football placed similar importance on match outcome and game
quality (Forrest & Simmons, 2002), with 'floating' fans
who do not attend regularly most focused on team success (Peel &
Thomas, 1996). Though actions can be undertaken to ensure a competitive
match with a higher probability of winning, there are no guarantees that
this will happen. However, there may be the an opportunity to ensure fan
satisfaction irrespective of the overall match quality or outcome,
considered core aspects of satisfaction, by focusing on the peripheral
aspects over which there is some level of control (FA Premier League
[FA], 2006; Van Leeuwen et al., 2002).
Attendance and the duration of stay at sporting events have been
associated with features of the stadium. Wakefield & Sloan (1995)
found perceived crowding reduced the length of time at American football
games, and cleanliness, parking facilities, and food service quality
increased length of stay. In the case of Australian Rugby supporters,
the overall set of stadium facilities (e.g. parking, cleanliness,
catering, crowding) did significantly predict attendance for home fans;
although individual stadium factors had limited impact on future
attendance and varied based on whether the attendee was a home or away
fan (Hill & Green, 2000). English football supporters confirmed that
similar factors such as the sight line, cleanliness, and food service
quality were also important to their overall match experience, and
supporters of clubs with newer stadiums do report more satisfaction with
these aspects of their attendance (FA, 2006; Waghorn, Downer &
Munby, 2005).
From a psychological perspective, Warm and his colleagues have
identified 8 motivations underlying sport fandom (Warm, 1995; Wann,
Melnick, Russell, & Pease, 2001); and it could be argued several of
these could be fulfilled through match attendance. The motivation for
belongingness or group affiliation has been linked to attendance in
across sports. The social benefit associated with the attendance was
identified as a primary reason for original support of a team, the
enjoyment of the event, and a lack of it was an important reason for the
cessation of this support (Warm, Tucker & Schrader, 1996; Warm &
Wilson, 1999). Behaviourally, this was confirmed when fewer than 30% of
respondents reported they attended a sporting event alone (Warm,
Friedman, McHale, & Jaffe, 2003). Opportunity for enhanced group
esteem resulted in increased attendance at American football games and
Japanese professional soccer leagues (Mahony, Nakazawa, Funk, James,
Gladden, 2002; Murrell & Dietz, 1992), thus contributing to another
sports fan's motivation: self-esteem reinforcement (Warm, 1995). It
has been suggested that membership of a highly regarded sport group
enhances individuals' social identity (Jacobson, 2003), allowing
the individual to 'bask in reflected glory' when the team is
successful (Cialidini et al. 1976; Sloan, 1979). Family-related
motivations for sport fandom may also be fulfilled through attendance.
Giuliannotti (2002) stated that, for the most dedicated type of football
supporters, 'the individual has a relationship with the club that
resembles those with close family and friends;' and continued
support in English football has been directly linked with the family
(Jones, 1997). Respondents to the EA. Premier League Survey (2006) said
attending with family members as one of the best features of match, with
21% being accompanied by their spouse, 32% with another family member,
and 8% with their children; thus further emphasising the importance of
the family motive to football fans.
Atmosphere has also been linked to enjoyment of sporting events
(Warm & Wilson, 1999). With the mandatory introduction of all-seater
stadiums throughout England in the 1990's, football fans expressed
concerns that atmosphere is now lacking (Sir Norman Chester Centre for
Football Research [SNCCFR], 2002). Surveys of English football
supporters indicated one of their top desires was to have a 'good
home atmosphere' (FA, 2006; Waghom et al., 2005); and many of them
would pay more for a ticket if that money was spent on creating a
'fantastic atmosphere' (Drivers Jonas, 2005). Yet what the
crowd wants in terms of atmosphere has never been addressed.
Thus, the aim of the study was to develop a preliminary
understanding of the factors comprising home atmosphere; and to approach
this task from the perspective of football supporters. Atmosphere,
rather than other peripheral factors associated with sport fan
satisfaction, was chosen because it was identified as a key desire by
the fans and is considered to be the one aspect which has the most
opportunity for modification. This study centred on two research
questions. Firstly, what role do the crowd factors previously associated
with home advantage play in the creation of atmosphere? Pollard (2006a)
presented a model for home advantage which included crowd support, a
latent variable based on the combination of crowd factors including
size, density, noise level and intensity. He also suggested that this
variable should be measured so that controlled experiments could be used
to further understand the home advantage phenomenon. It was not the
purpose of this study to determine how atmosphere, which may be similar
to his crowd support variable, impacts home advantage. Instead, the goal
was to take the preliminary steps in quantifying the construct for
future research. However, atmosphere was believed to be more than just
the cumulative effects of these impersonal crowd factors. Several of the
psychological motivations for sport fandom proposed by Wann and his
colleagues also seemed relevant to the construct. Therefore, the second
question focused on the interplay between these crowd factors and the
more social aspects of match attendance in creating this atmosphere.
Method
Participants
Respondents were recruited from three fan websites dedicated to one
English premiership football club (n=442) and completed the survey
voluntarily. The home stadium of these supporters has a capacity of
approximately 50,000 with pub facilities in the ground. Average
attendance for the club during the 2005-2006 season was just under 34,
000 which was 70% of capacity (Football365.com).
The majority of respondents were men (91.6%), which was slightly
higher than a survey (85%) conducted by the football association for
that season (FA, 2006). Most of the respondents had a season ticket
(n=275), held from 1 to 35 years (M=9.01 SD = 5.86). Of those providing
postcode information (n=414), nearly 65% resided in the Northeast of
England, a small number of lived abroad (1.1%), and the remainder
resided in other areas of England. Participants' were relatively
evenly distributed across age groups: 16-24 (31.4%), 25-34 (22.2%),
34-44 (20%), and 45-54 (26%). Two people declined to provide their age.
Responses from participants between the ages of 16-18 were included in
analyses because 16-24 is considered a key demographic in English
football. The data was collected in accordance with the British
Psychological Society's ethical code of conduct (2005; 2006) and
guidelines for internet research (2007) which consider 16 to be the age
of consent for research participation.
Nearly three-quarters of respondents (73.2%) stated that being a
supporter of the club was a large part of their social identity and that
their allegiance to the club could not change (87.4%). Over half (51.8%)
attended between 1 and 5 away matches per season, 18% attended between 6
and 10, a further 8% attended 11 or more, and 3% attended all away
matches including cup fixtures. This dedicated group of participants was
not fully representative of football fans across England. Giulannotti
(2002) suggested 4 types of sports fans within football, of which this
group approximates the most dedicated, the 'supporter'.
Materials and Procedure
Respondents were asked to choose the top 5 characteristics from a
set of 10; and then ranked those 5 for their relative importance to the
creation of home atmosphere, with 1 indicating the most important. These
characteristics were chosen based on their prevalence throughout the
home advantage, sport fandom, and sports marketing literature. It should
be noted that the set of items presented here was considered as a
starting point for defining the construct rather than an exhaustive
list.
The first three items were considered to be primarily physical
aspects of match attendance. Size of the home crowd (density as measured
by full capacity), overall stadium size, and cheering and singing of
fans (noise level) have previously been identified as the most important
contributors to home advantage (Agnew & Carron, 1994; Nevill, Balmer
& Williams, 2002; Schwartz & Barsky, 1977). These three factors
were also considered important to atmosphere because English football
supporters indicated singing/chanting and the crowd were the best
features of the match (FA, 2006; Waghorn et al, 2005).
Several items were chosen as representative of the social
comparative processes underlying football fandom. History with the
opponent and opponent league standing were viewed as proxies for social
comparison between clubs. According to social comparison theory
(Festinger, 1954), social standing is determined by comparisons to
others; in this instance supporters could judge their groups'
standing based partially on the standing of the opponent. League
standing of the home team impacted attendance at football matches
(Simmons, 1996), and fans consider the potential match outcome when
making attendance decisions (Borland & MacDonald, 2003; Forrest
& Simmons, 2002; Peel & Thomas, 1995). The location of the away
fans in the ground was included because Bale (1993) emphasized the
location of away fans as a representation of group comparisons by
letting people 'know their place' (p. 48). Away supporter
representation within the ground has also been suggested as a key
component to atmosphere within football stadiums (Guilannotti, 2004).
Social comparisons can occur based on the individual's proximity to
the pitch. Traditionally seating locations within football stadiums have
implied social standing (Bale, 1993; Guilliannotti, 2004); and
additionally, fans listed the site line as the most important factor in
their match experience (FA, 2006; Waghorn et al 2005).
A further three items focused on the group-affiliation and
self-esteem motives underlying sport fandom (e.g. Jacobson, 2003, Wann,
1995; Wann et al, 2001; Wann, 2006; Sloan, 1979). The first, a measure
of belongingness, asked respondents to rate the feeling of connectedness
with other supporters whilst at the match. According to Wann, Tucker and
Schrader (1996), sports fans reported affiliation as one of the top
reasons for originally becoming a fan, their continued support of the
team, and ceased their support if they do not receive the group
affiliation so desired. A place dedicated to club memorabilia was viewed
as a means for achievement-seeking fans (Sloan, 1979) to perpetually
bask in the team's past glory, known as BIRG-ing (Cialidini et al,
1976); thereby further enhancing their identity and esteem in a positive
manner. Finally, an item regarding the presence of pubs and eateries was
included because such a venue would provide a place for socialization and group affiliation. English football fans they stated would arrive
earlier if better catering and entertainment options were available at
the grounds and meeting family and friends was one of the best features
of the match (FA, 2006; Waghorn et al, 2005).
Data collection lasted for six weeks. A brief request for
participation was placed on each website, with a link to the survey.
None of the sites were officially associated with the club and no
incentives to participate were offered.
Results
Table 1 provides a summary of the relative importance of each of
the characteristics to the creation of home atmosphere. This table shows
the percentage of respondents ranking each characteristic from 1 to 5,
as well as the percentage that did not rank an item in their top 5 (item
non-response). Approximately one third of respondents misunderstood the
instructions and ranked all ten items between 1 and 5. However, as this
still allowed the relative importance of each item to atmosphere to be
determined, their responses were included in the table and subsequent
analysis. None of the ten characteristics had completed item
non-response, indicating that all items were considered to contribute to
atmosphere.
The most important features to home atmosphere were two physical
aspects: singing/ cheering and a full capacity crowd. An overwhelming
majority listed singing as 1st with very few respondents (1.4%) not
ranking it in the top five. Crowd size (capacity), as opposed to stadium
size (maximum crowd size), was ranked as 1st by 35% of respondents.
After these two features, no more than 15% of respondents ranked any
other characteristic as the top contributor to home atmosphere.
Approximately half of all respondents did not rank the location of away
fans in the ground (45.3%), their own proximity to the pitch (48.9%),
and overall stadium size (53.4%) amongst their top 5 most important
factors; however, fewer people left 'opponent's league
standing' blank (35.5%) than any of the three prior characteristics
listed. This suggested that it was of more importance to atmosphere
overall than any of the other three characteristics. The features viewed
as having the least importance were pubs/eateries near the ground and a
place with club memorabilia.
Discussion
The purpose of this study was to determine the some of the factors
that create home atmosphere at professional football matches in England,
and to do so from the perspective of the supporter. A study of this
construct was considered timely because research indicates that
attendees value a good atmosphere (Driver Jonas, 2005; FA, 2006; Waghorn
et al, 2005); yet there has been no systematic study of what they feel
comprises it. Atmosphere was viewed similarly to the crowd factor
Pollard (2006a) identified in his model of home advantage; but it was
also expected that the more social components of match attendance which
related to the psychological motives of sport fandom would be important
to understanding the construct as well. The proposed characteristics of
home atmosphere were identified based on the social psychological
literature of sports fan motivation, the study of home advantage in
sports sciences, and findings of English Football Association supporter
surveys.
The results indicated the two most important factors were crowd
noise (singing/cheering) and crowd size (density). Both history with the
opponent and feeling connected with other supporters were considered
more important to atmosphere than the potential for a very large crowd,
as measured through stadium size. The location of away fans and
proximity to the pitch made a lower relative contribution. This was
followed by opponent's league standing; although overall, it was
more important to the home atmosphere than these two characteristics or
stadium size individually as indicated by its lower level of item
non-response. The presence of pubs/eateries in or around the ground and
a place with club memorabilia were rated the least important
contributors to atmosphere.
It was expected that individual crowd features previously related
to home advantage would be important to atmosphere (Pollard, 2006a) and
the results supported this. It is interesting to note that a full
capacity crowd, which could be considered a measure of crowd density,
was ranked as more important than stadium size (potential crowd size).
The greater importance of the full capacity crowd/density suggested that
empty seats may affect atmosphere more than the sheer number of
supporters. Sports fans consider their affiliation with a team to be a
part of their social identity (King, 2000; Wann & Branscombe, 1993).
For football supporters, attendance at a match with a sell-out crowd may
add to the feeling that they belong to something others perceive to be
quite special (Melnick, 1993); thereby positively reinforcing their
social identity. However, large blocks of empty seats (i.e. low crowd
density) may imply that their identity is being undermined in some way
because others do not view supporting the team through match attendance
as important. The lower importance of stadium size may also be explained
within the context of the particular club, which plays in one of the
newer, larger football stadiums in England. For this team, the
club's attendance record for the season was 70% of its 50,000
capacity; so a full-capacity crowd would also be a large one,
confounding the two factors.
Atmosphere, however, was not solely comprised of these factors
related to home advantage. Singing/cheering of football fans, stadium
density and stadium size were intermingled amongst aspects of match
attendance which could be viewed as fulfilling the psychological needs
proposed to underlie sport random (Warm, 1995; Warm et al., 2001).
History with the opponent and connection with other supporters may
represent the psychological self-esteem and group affiliation motives of
sport random respectively. All the physical characteristics associated
with home atmosphere appear to have some social component to them. The
noise level created by singing and cheering probably does not impact on
atmosphere simply because of the sheer decibel level. Instead, the
higher noise level may represent increased feelings of belongingness
amongst supporters because they see themselves as part of one voice, the
12th man, which positively reinforces that aspect of their identity
associated with the football club. Even proximity to the pitch or the
sightline has a social implication. Historically, location within a
ground has indicated social standing amongst supporters (Giulanotti,
2004; Russell, 1999). Respondents did not find sitting in a particular
location of the highest importance to the atmosphere, but it can reflect
a particular social identity amongst supporters.
What was surprising was the relatively low value placed on
locations with memorabilia and pubs/eateries at the stadium. Locations
with memorabilia should provide opportunity for basking in the past
glory of the team's success, providing an additional means of
social identity and self-esteem enhancement. It could be the case that
because this particular club has won very few accolades in the past,
this was not considered as relevant. This would be consistent with
cutting off from reflective failure (Snyder, Lassegard, & Ford,
1986). Instead of distancing themselves from the team, the fans just
placed less value on what could be considered a widely accepted method
of measuring success. For clubs with a strong tradition of winning
league titles, cup competitions, and international championships, a
place for memorabilia may be of greater importance. Pubs and eateries
were expected to add to the atmosphere because it would provide
opportunity for sociability with other supporters; thereby enhancing the
group affiliative and family-related benefits of sport random (Warm,
1995; Warm et al., 2002). Perhaps these were ranked of lesser importance
because the atmosphere during the match and secondary match day events
such as this were considered distinct to most supporters.
The results of this study may be useful for future stadium design,
sports marketing, and understand the complex factors underlying home
advantage. Supporters stated that a full-capacity stadium with
cheering/singing supporters was integral to atmosphere. Designing the
stadium with acoustics that maximise noise level could be valuable to
home advantage because it enhances atmosphere. Noise level has been
shown to benefit the home side due the reduction in fouls awarded
against them (Balmer, et al., 2007; Lane, Nevill, Ahmad, & Balmer,
2006; Nevill, Balmer, & Williams, 2002). The results also suggest
that designs which minimise the appearance of empty seating areas could
contribute to the atmosphere. A stadium with 50,000 capacity and 10,000
empty seats may be perceived as having less atmosphere (and threatening
supporter identity) than a stadium which holds only 40,000 capacity but
is filled to capacity. For sports marketers, understanding what a
football supporter wants in terms of atmosphere is important. Clubs can
take steps to meet these consumer demands; thereby enhancing the
experience, enjoyment of the match, and potentially developing stronger
ties with the team. Madrigal (2004), in a review of studies examining
the purchasing behaviour of sports fans, reported that stronger links
with the team resulted in greater attendance and merchandise purchases
from both the club and its sponsors. The findings overall provide
further support for the assertion (Dowie, 1982; Pollard, 2006a) that it
is the interplay of crowd factors rather than any crowd factor
individually making an impact on home advantage; and, it is the
composite of these along with the social factors identified in this
study that results in atmosphere and thereby competitive advantage.
However, future studies would need to establish a direct link between
atmosphere and home advantage.
Methodologically speaking, the results of this study have some
limited generalizability. Respondents were web-savvy supporters of one
premier league football club in a specific region of the country. Fans
across sports have been classified into groups based on their loyalty to
the club and consumption through attendance and merchandise purchasing
(Giuliannotti, 2002; Tapp & Clowes, 2000); and it appears the
participants in this study were the most dedicated group, the supporter
or fanatic. This type of sport fan would be characterized by a
self-image heavily influenced by their status as a football supporter.
Therefore, this sample was clearly not representative of all football
supporters throughout England. However, Giuliannotti (2002) noted it is
this group which may be primarily associated with the creation of the
atmosphere, which draws other, less committed spectators to attend.
Additionally, this was an on-line survey which may further limit the
generalizability of the results. Web respondents are self-selected and
maybe different from the population (Kraut et al., 2004); although this
research method is generally accepted within the social sciences
(Gosling et al, 2004) and has been used successfully with football
supporters in England in the past (Wolfson, Wakelin & Lewis, 2005).
Finally, there was also an issue with respondents misunderstanding the
ranking instructions. Some respondents ranked all 10 items on a scale of
1 to 5 (with 1 being most important) rather and choosing 5 of the ten
and ranking them in order of importance. As a descriptive study intended
to initially explore the meaning of home atmosphere, this was not viewed
as a serious concern because the relative importance of each
characteristic could still be determined.
Future research should first confirm that the characteristics
included in this study are the only primary contributors to atmosphere
by providing a concrete definition of home atmosphere for respondents to
comment upon, as well as the opportunity to identify additional ones.
Preliminary results from another study (Charleston, 2006) indicated that
the components of a good home atmosphere are primarily the same both at
home and away, and across stadiums varying considerably in size; but it
would be useful to further explore this in a more extended study. It
would also be interesting to investigate how the important components of
atmosphere vary by location within the ground, regionally, and across
divisions of professional football. In other words, do supporters find
the same characteristics contribute to 'home atmosphere'
irrespective of location? Another line of future research would be to
examine what role the culture of a football club play in determining
atmosphere. Traditionally supporters of individual clubs have developed
collective cultures (Canter, Comber, & Uzzell, 1989), for example
the wit of Liverpool's KOP or the previously aggressive reputations
Milwall or West Ham United in the 1980's and 1990's; and
arguably this will have some effect on their views of atmosphere.
Exploring the meaning of home atmosphere from the viewpoint of
footballers and managers would further contribute to a clear picture of
the construct.
To summarize, the perception of dedicated supporters at this north
eastern English football club was that a variety of social and physical
characteristics combined to create home atmosphere, with primary
emphasis ascribed to singing and cheering amongst a full stadium of
supporters. They do not necessarily need a large stadium for the best
atmosphere as indicated by the lower ranking of overall stadium size;
but do want a feeling of belonging or connectedness with other
supporters (perhaps as expressed through singing and cheering) in a
context of history between the sides and league standing of the
opponent. Neither the crowd features associated with home advantage nor
social aspects of match attendance were solely responsible for home
atmosphere in English professional football. This exploratory study
provided a starting point from which future research can confirm and
refine the components of home atmosphere, from a variety of perspectives
(i.e. supporter, player, manager), and across divisions of professional
football.
References
Agnew, G. & Carron, A. (1994) Crowd effects and the home
advantage. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 25, 53-62.
Bale, J. (1993). The paradox of modern stadium landscapes. In John
Bale: Sport, Space and the City. London: Routledge.
Balmer, N., Nevill, A., Lane, A., Ward, P, Williams, A. &
Fairclough, S. (2007). Influence of crowd noise on soccer refereeing
consistency in soccer. Journal of Sport Behavior, 30(2), 130-145.
Borland, J. & Macdonald, R. (2003). Demand for sport. Oxford
Review of Economic Policy, 19(4), 478-502.
British Psychological Society. (2005). Code of conduct, ethical
principals and guidelines. Leicester, Author.
British Psychological Society. (2006). Code of ethics and conduct.
Retrieved May 1, 2007 from:
http://www.bps.org.uk/the-society/ethics-rules-charter-code-of-conduct
/code-of-conduct/code-of-conduct_home.cfm. Leicester: Author.
British Psychological Society. (2007). Report on the working party
on conducting research on the internet: Guidelines for ethical practice
in psychological research online. Leicester: Author.
Canter, D., Comber, M. & Uzzell, D. (1989). Football in its
place: An environmental psychology of football grounds. London:
Routledge.
Carron, A., Loughhead, T., & Bray, S. (2005). The home
advantage in sport competitions: Courneya and Carron's (1992)
conceptual framework a decade later. Journal of Sports Sciences, 23,
395-407.
Charleston, S. (2006). [English supporter views of away grounds in
the English Premiere League]. Unpublished raw data.
Cialdini, R., Borden, R., Thorne, A., Walker, M., Freeman, S.,
& Sloan, L. (1976). Basking in reflected glory: Three (football)
field studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34(3),
366-375.
Courneya, K. & Carron, A. (1992). The home advantage in sport
competitions: A literature review. Journal of Sport and Exercise
Psychology, 14, 13-27.
Dowie, J. (1982). Why Spain should win the World Cup. New
Scientist, 10, 693-695.
Drivers Jonas (2005). The football fan census: football stadia
report 2005 survey results. Retrieved 29 October, 2007, from
http://www.driversjonas.com/img.aspx?
CID=864490&LangID=1&DocId=15453&DocVersion=7085&log=1
The FA Premier League (2006). The FA Premier League national fan
survey report 2005/ 2006. London: Author.
Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes.
Human Relations, 7, 117-140.
Footbal1365.com. (2006). Barclays premiership 2005-2006 season
domestic stats to 11-Jul-06 inclusive attendance table. Retrieved
February 19, 2007, from
http://stats.football365.com/2006/ENG/PR/attend.html.
Forrest, D. & Simmons, R. (2002). Outcome uncertainty and
attendance demand on sport: The case of English soccer. The
Statistician, 51(2), 229-241.
Funk, D., Ridinger, L. & Moorman; A. (2004). Exploring origins
of involvement: Understanding the relationship between consumer motives
and involvement with professional sports teams. Leisure Sciences, 26,
35-61.
Gayton, W., Broida, J. & Elgee, L. (2001). An investigation of
coaches' perception of the causes of home advantage. Perceptual and
Motor Skills, 92, 933-936.
Gosling, S.D., Vazire, S., Srivastava, S., & John, O.P. (2004).
Should we trust web-based studies? American Psychologist, 59(2), 93-104.
Giuliannotti, R. (2002). Supporters, followers, fans, and flanuers:
A taxonomy of spectator identities in football. Journal of Sport and
Social Issues, 26(1), 25-26.
Giulianotti, R. (2004). Football grounds: Emotional attachments and
social control. In R. Giulanotti (Ed.) Football: A sociology of the
global game. London: Polity Press.
Hill, B. & Green, B. (2000). Repeat attendance as a function of
involvement, loyalty, and the sportscape across three football studies.
Sport Management Review, 3, 145-162.
Jacobson, B. (2003). The social psychology of the creation of a
sports fan identity: A theoretical review of the literature. Athletic
Insight: The Online Journal of Sport Psychology, 5(2). Retrieved June
12, 2007, from http://www.athleticinsight.com/vol5Iss2/FanDevelopment.htm.
Jones, I. (1997). A further examination of the factors influencing
current identification with a sports team, a response to Wann, et al
(1996). Perceptual and Motor Skills, 85, 257-258.
Kelley, S. & Turley, L. (2001). Consumer perceptions of service
quality attributes at sporting events. Journal of Business Research, 54,
161-166.
King, A. (2000). Football random and post-national identity in the
new Europe. The British Journal of Sociology, 51, 419-442.
Kraut, R., Olson, J., Banaji, M., Bruckman, A., Cohen, J., &
Couper, M. (2004). Psychological research online: Report of board of
scientific affair' advisory group on the conduct of research on the
Internet. American Psychologist, 59(2), 105-117.
Lane, A., Nevill, A., Ahmad, N. & Balmer, N. (2006). Soccer
referee decision-making: 'shall I blow the whistle?' Journal
of Sports Science and Medicine, 5, 243-253.
Madrigal, R. (1995). Cognitive and Affective Determinants of Fan
Satisfaction with Sporting Event Attendance. Journal of Leisure
Research, 27(3), 205-227.
Madrigal, R. (2004). A review of team identification and its
influence on consumers' responses toward corporate sponsors. In L.
Kahle & C. Riley (Eds), Sports Marketing and the Psychology of
Marketing Communication. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc. Inc.
Mahony, D., Nakazawa, M., Funk, D., James, J., Gladden, J. (2002).
Motivational factors influencing the behaviour of J. League spectators.
Sport Management Review, 5, 1-24.
Melnick, M.J. (1993). Searching for sociability in the stands: A
theory of sports spectating. Journal of Sports Management, 7, 44-60.
Murrell, A. & Dietz, B. (1992). Fan support of sport teams: the
effect of a common group identity. Journal of Sport and Exercise
Psychology, 14, 28-39.
Nevill, A. Balmer, N., & Williams, M. (2002). The influence of
crowd noise and experience upon refereeing decisions in football.
Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 3, 261-272.
Nevill, A., & Holder, R. (1999). Home advantage in sport: An
overview of studies on the advantage of playing at home. Sports Med, 28,
221-236.
Nevill, A., Newell, S., & Gale, S. (1996). Factors associated
with home advantage in English and Scottish soccer matches. Journal of
Sports Sciences, 14, 181-186.
Peel, D. & Thomas, D. (1996). Attendance demand: An
investigation of repeat fixtures. Applied Economics Letters, 3, 391-394.
Pollard, R. (1986). Home advantage in soccer: A retrospective
analysis. Journal of Sports Sciences, 4,237-248.
Pollard, R. (2006a). Home advantage in soccer: variations in
magnitude and a literature review of the inter-related factors
associated with its existence. Journal of Sport Behavior, 29(2),
169-189.
Pollard, R. (2006b). Worldwide regional variations in home
advantage in association football. Journal of Sports Sciences, 24,
231-240.
Pollard, R., & Pollard, G. (2005). Home advantage in soccer: A
review of its existence and causes, International journal of soccer and
science, 3(1), 28-38.
Russell, D. (1999). Associating with football: Social identity in
England 1863-1998. In G. Armstrong & R. Guilianotti (Eds.), Football
cultures and identities (pp. 15-28). London: Macmillen.
Schwartz, B., & Barsky, S. (1977). The home advantage. Social
Forces, 55(3), 641-661.
Simmons, R. (1996). The demand for English league football: A
club-level analysis. Applied Economics, 28, 139-155.
Sir Norman Chester Centre for Football Research (2002). Fact sheet
number 2: Football stadium after Taylor. Leicester: University of
Leicester.
Sloan, (1979). The function and impact of sports for fans: A review
of theory and contemporary research. In Goldstein & Haskell (Eds):
Sports, Games and Play. London: Wiley. pp 219-262.
Smith, D.R. (2003). The home advantage revisited: Winning and crowd
support in an era of national publics. Journal of Sport and Social
Issues, 27(4), 346-371.
Snyder, Lassegard & Ford (1986). Distancing after group success
and failure: basking in reflected glory and cutting off reflected
failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(2), 382-388.
Sutter, M. & Kocher, M. (2004). Favoritism of agents: The case
of referees' home bias. Journal of Economic Psychology, 25(4),
461-469.
Tapp, A. & Clowes, J. (2002). From 'carefree casuals'
to 'professional wanders': Segmentation possibilities for
football supporters. European Journal of Marketing, 36 (11/ 12),
1248-1269
Thirer, J. & Rampey, M. (1979). Effects of abusive spectators' behaviour on performance of home and visiting
intercollegiate basketball teams. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 48,
1047-1053.
VanLeeuwen, L., Quick, S. & Daniel, K. (2002). The sport
spectator satisfaction model: A conceptual framework for understanding
the satisfaction of spectators. Sport Management Review, 5, 99-128.
Waghorn, R., Downer, J. & Munby, R. (2005). The FA Premier
League national fan survey report 2004/2005. London: Author.
Wakefield, K. & Sloan, H. (1995). The effects of team loyalty
and selected stadium factors on spectator attendance. Journal of Sport
Management, 9, 153-172.
Wann, D. (1995). Preliminary validation of the sport fan motivation
scale. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 19(4), 377-396.
Wann, D. (2006). The causes and consequences of sport team
identification. In AA Raney & J Bryant (Eds) Handbook of Sports and
Media. Mahwah, N J: Erlbaum, pp. 331-352.
Wann, D. & Branscombe, N. (1993). Sports fans: Measuring degree
of identification with their team. Internal Journal of Sport Psychology,
24, 1-17.
Wann, D., Friedman, K, McHale, M. & Jaffe, A. (2003). The
Norelco sport fanatics survey: Examining behaviors of sports fans.
Psychological Reports, 92, 930-936.
Wann, D. & Wilson, A. (1999). Variables associated with sport
fan' s enjoyment of athletic events. Perceptual and Motor Skills,
89, 419-422.
Waters, A. & Lovell, G. (2002). An examination of the homefield
advantage in a professional English soccer team from a psychological
standpoint. Football Studies, 5(1), 46-59.
Wolfson, S., Wakelin, D., & Lewis, M. (2005). Football
supporters' perception of their role in the home advantage. Journal
of Sports Sciences, 23, 365-374.
Stephanie Charleston
University of Sunderland
Address Correspondence To: Stephanie Charleston, Senior Lecturer,
Department of Psychology, University of Sunderland, Sunderland, SR6 0DD,
United Kingdom, Phone: 0 191-515-2601, E-mail:
stephanie.charleston@sunderland.ac.uk
Table 1. Relative Importance of Characteristics Related to Home
Atmosphere
Percentage of 1-5 rankings per
characteristic (a)
Item
not
Characteristic 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th ranked (b)
Cheering & Singing 59.7 21.9 4.5 5.0 7.5 1.4
Crowd Size 35.3 29.9 13.8 7.7 8.8 4.5
History w/ Opponent 14.3 12.9 17.5 15.2 11.8 28.3
Connect w/
Supporters 10.6 17.0 18.8 16.7 12.0 24.8
Stadium Size 6.3 7.9 13.1 8.8 10.6 53.4
Away Fan Location 6.1 9.7 16.1 11.1 11.8 45.3
Proximity to the
Pitch 6.1 9.7 17.0 8.8 9.5 48.9
Opponent Lg.
Standing 4.8 9.7 16.1 18.1 15.8 35.5
Pubs in Ground 5.0 5.9 9.5 9.0 10.2 60.4
Memorabilia
Location 3.8 5.2 7.5 5.0 7.9 70.6
(a) Percentages may not total to 100 due to rounding.
(b) The values here indicate single item non-response.