Learned helplessness and basketball playoff performance.
Thomas, Greg
Research in sports psychology indicates a relationship between
anxiety and both the level of competition and the importance of the
athletic event. Klavora (1974) observed that state anxiety was lower in
preseason practice than prior to competition in high school and college
basketball and football players, and that state anxiety increased for
college basketball players from regular-season games to playoff
competition. Gill (1980) reported that state anxiety for competitive
basketball players is higher prior to competition than during practice
sessions. Leonard (1986) in his comparison of 505 university athletes,
found that Division I athletes perceived being under greater pressure in
their sport than athletes competing in Division II or Division III.
In general, greater perceived stress leads to a decrement in athletic
performance. Regression analyses of a study by Cox (1986) of 157 female
college volleyball players showed a significant linear relationship
between spiking performance and competitive state anxiety with spiking
performance decreasing with increases in anxiety. Williams and Jenkins
(1986), using a small sample of college basketball players, found that
high anxiety in a competitive situation was debilitating to athlete
performance.
Krane, Williams, and Feltz (1992) reported a reciprocal relationship
between performance expectations and cognitive anxiety among 100 female
collegiate golfers. They also found previous performance to be the best
predictor of golfing performance. Kleine's (1990) meta-analysis of
the effects of anxiety on sport performance, using 50 studies published
between 1970 and 1988 yielded a weighted mean of all correlations of r =
-. 19, indicating a negative relationship between anxiety and sport
performance.
Anxious athletes are often athletes who are also depressed. A number
of studies have indicated that it is especially difficult to
discriminate between symptoms of anxiety and depression as the diagnoses
for both tend to covary (Bystritisky, Stoessel, & Yager, 1993;
Jolly, 1993; Jolly, Aruffo, Wherry, & Livingston, 1993; Somer &
Klein, 1993; Tambs & Moum, 1993). In addition, it has been shown
that measures of self-esteem correlate significantly and negatively with
depression and anxiety (Rawson, 1992).
According to Seligman (1975, 1991), depression is associated with a
state known as "learned helplessness." Seligman states that
learned helplessness develops from the belief that one's actions
are futile. This belief, Seligman postulates, is engendered by defeat
and failure as well as by uncontrollable situations. Seligman's
theory predicts that a person suffering from learned helplessness will
lose interest in their usual activities, show psychomotor retardation and lost energy, not think well, have difficulties remaining attentive,
and blame their failure to solve problems on their own lack of ability
and worthlessness.
Elite athletes would appear to be less likely to develop symptoms of
learned helplessness. In his study of male and female weightlifters,
Mahoney (1989) collected self-rating data showing elite athletes to be
significantly lower than their less successful peers in depression and
psychoticism. Overall, they rated themselves as more psychologically
healthy than other athletes. Previous research by Mahoney, Gabriel, and
Perkins (1987), using questionnaire data collected from 713 athletes
from 23 sports had found differences between elite, pre-elite and
non-elite collegiate athletes in the areas of concentration, anxiety
management, self-confidence, mental preparation, and motivation.
A review of the literature indicates that a lack of research in the
area of elite professional athletes and anxiety-producing events such as
the championship games. Specifically, the performances of elite
basketball players in playoff competition has yet to be studied.
According to popular sportswriters such as Menzer (1993), during the
National Basketball Association (NBA) playoffs, players perform
differently than they do during the regular season. Menzer states that
while great players continue to play great, average players perform
below the level they played in the regular season. He failed to defend
these notions with objective data.
The present study tested the relationship of learned helplessness to
professional basketball performance in the playoffs. It was hypothesized
that professional basketball players with high production during the
regular season would maintain their level of performance during playoff
competition, while players with lower regular-season production would
decline. Players with the lowest regular-season production were executed
to decline the most.
Method
Data were obtained from The Points Created Pro Basketball Book
(Bellotti, 1993-1994). In this publication, Bob Bellotti lists the
points created per minute (PC/M) and the minutes per game (MPG) of each
NBA player who played at least 1000 minutes during the 1992-93 NBA
season. The PC/M is a production efficiency figure for each player and
is determined by a formula using a player's points scored, assists,
rebounds, blocked shots, steals, fouls committed, missed shots and
minutes played.
This study used PC/M figures for each player who played at least 1000
minutes during the regular season and also participated in at least
three playoff games. Three playoff games were chosen because that is the
minimum number of losses needed for a NBA team to be eliminated from the
playoffs. The 134 players who met these criteria were categorized as
High Ability (n = 45), Medium Ability (n = 44) and Low Ability (n = 45)
based on their regular-season PC/M figures.
Statistical analyses on data were done as follows: One-way analyses
of variance (ANOVAs) were used to test for the effect of the ability
variable on playoff PC/M. Following ANOVAs, the honestly significant
difference test (HSC)) was used for multigroup comparisons (Tukey,
1984). In addition, comparisons of regular season versus playoff
performance of players within ability groups were done using paired
t-tests.
Results
A one-way (ANOVA) found regular-season PC/M to have a significant
effect on playoff PC/M, ,F(2, 131) = 30. 15, p [less than] .01.
Multigroup comparisons using Tukey's HSD showed that players with
high ability in the regular season, as measured by PC/M, performed
better in the playoffs (M = .498) than players with medium ability (M =
.396), n [less than] .01, and also better than players with low ability
(M = .304), p [less than] .01. Players who exhibited medium ability (M =
.396) in the regular season performed better in the playoffs than those
with low ability (M = .304), p [less than] .01.
For all 134 players, regular-season PC/M was found to be an excellent
predictor (r = .68, p [less than] .01) of playoff PC/M. Players who
played well in the regular-season tended to play well in the playoffs.
Regular-season MPG was also found to be an excellent predictor (r = .87,
p [less than] .01) of playoff MPG. Players who played a lot of minutes
per game in the regular season also played often during the playoffs.
T-tests were conducted comparing regular-season PC/M with playoff
PC/M for high, medium, and low ability players. All three groups of
players showed a significant decrement in playoff PC/M from their
regular-season PC/M. The mean PC/M for high-ability players fell from
.589 in the regular season to .498 in the playoffs, t(44) = -5.65, p
[less than] .01. The mean PC/M for medium-ability players fell from .450
in the regular season to .396 in the playoffs, t(43) = -2.98, p [less
than] .01. The mean PC/M for low-ability players fell from .366 in the
regular season to .304 in the playoffs, t(44) = -4.90, p [less than]
.01. When all players were considered together, the mean PC/M dropped
from .469 in the regular season to .399, t(133) = -4.44, p [less than]
.01.
Comparisons were also made of players' playoff MPG with their
regular season MPG. High ability players showed a significant increase
in their MPG from the regular season (M = 33.23) to the playoffs (M =
35.45), t(44) = 3.72, p [less than] .01. This means that star or elite
players were given more minutes per game in the playoffs than during the
regular season. Although medium-ability players increased their mean MPG
from 26.94 in the regular season to 27.29 in the playoffs, the increase
was not significant, t(43) = .417, p [greater than] .05. Low-ability
players experienced a nonsignificant drop in MPG from the regular season
(M = 21,131) to the playoffs (M = 20.15), p [greater than] .05.
In order to isolate the effect of different ability levels on playoff
performance, Playoff indexes were formed for PC/M and MPG for each
player. This was done by dividing players' playoff figures by their
regular season figures. Results of a one-way ANOVA failed to show an
effect for player ability level on playoff PC/M Index, F(2, 131) = .54,
p [greater than] .05.
Players with high regular-season PC/M figures, the elite players,
contributed only 84.2% of their regular-season PC/M during the playoffs.
Players with medium regular-season PC/M figures contributed only 88.2%
of their regular-season PC/M during the playoffs. Players with low
regular-season PC/M figures contributed only 83.5% of their
regular-season PC/M during the playoffs.
Because this study had earlier discovered that players with high
regular-season PC/M had played significantly more minutes per game in
the playoffs than they had during the regular season, it was suspected
that fatigue had lowered their playoff productivity. This was explored
by correlating each players playoff PC/M index with his playoff MPG
index. Surprisingly, a small positive correlation rather than negative
correlation was found between playoff PC/M index and playoff MPG index
for high-ability players (r = .08, p [greater than] .05), as well as for
medium-ability players (r = . 12, p [greater than] .05), and low-ability
players (r = .14, p [greater than] .05). Additional minutes per game in
the playoffs did not prevent players of any ability level from playing
well.
Discussion
This study tested the applicability of Seligman's (1975) concept
of learned helplessness to professional basketball players in playoff
competition. It was predicted that players who performed best during the
regular-season would be inoculated from the effects of learned
helplessness. High-ability or elite players were not expected to decline
in their productivity during the playoffs. Other players were expected
to show a decline in their performance according to their ability, with
low-ability players expected to decline greatest between the regular
season and the playoffs.
Hypotheses based upon the theory of learned helplessness were only
partially supported. Players of all ability levels - high, medium, or
low, showed a decrease in production efficiency during the playoffs.
Basketball players who had established themselves as elite or
high-ability players continued to outperform other players, but only to
the degree that their production efficiency established during the
regular season would have predicted. They were no more or less immune to
the effects of learned helplessness than their less talented peers.
Several possible explanations may account for the results of this
study. Because defense is emphasized during the playoffs and the pace of
the game is slowed (Menzer, 1993), it is not all that surprising that
all players suffered a loss in productivity as measured by PC/M League
statistics show that the average team scored 105.3 points during the
regular season but only 95.2 during the playoffs (Carter & Sachare,
1993-1994). Most of the statistics used to determine players' PC/M
ratings are based on offensive rather than defensive production.
More challenging to explain was that high-, medium-, and low-ability
players tended to show a similar adaptation to the stress of playoff
competition. One possible explanation is the extreme length of the NBA
playoffs. Depending upon the team for which the player performed, the
players participated in between 3 to 22 playoff contests. Perhaps, this
large number of "big games" made them seem not so big. Many
players participated in the playoffs for well over a month. It could be
that because of the length of the playoff schedule, players began to
perceive playoff games as only minimal stressors.
Perhaps the likeliest explanation for the study's results is
that all professional basketball players, whatever their production
levels in the NBA, are indeed elite athletes and are a singular group
rather than a multitiered entity. At any given time, the 27 teams of the
NBA can provide employment for only 324 players. Even the worst player
in the league might count himself as one of the top athletes in the
world.
Such an individual might have been immunized from learned
helplessness at a very young age. Cole (1991) found competency based
feedback in several domains, including sports, to be related to
depression in young children. He obtained self-reports of depression
from 1,422 elementary children as well as peer nomination of competency
in five domains: academic, social, physical attractiveness, conduct, and
sports. Being nominated as relatively incompetent in multiple domains
corresponded with higher levels of self-reported depression.
Future research should investigate the process by which athletic
achievement can work as a deterrent against later learned helplessness.
It could be that the process works quite differently depending upon an
individual's gender, race, family constellation, or socioeconomic
status. There might also be a critical period during which immunization is most likely to achieve results.
References
Bellotti, R. S. (1993-1994). The Points Created Pro Basketball Book.
New Brunswick, NJ: Night Work.
Bystritsky, A., Stoessel, P., & Yaeger, J. (1993). Psychometric discrimination between anxiety and depression. Journal of Nervous and
Mental Disease, 181, 265-267.
Carter, C., & Sachare, A. (Eds.) (1993-1994). The sporting news
NBA guide. St. Louis: The Sporting News.
Cole, D. A. (1991). Preliminary support for a competency-based model
of depression in children. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100, 181-190.
Cox, R. H. (1986). Relationship between skill performance in
women's volleyball and competitive state anxiety. International
Journal of Sport Psychology, 17, 183-190.
Gill, D. L. (1980). Comparison of three measures of pre-competition
arousal. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 51, 765-766.
Jolly, J. B. (1993). A multi-method test of the cognitive
content-specificity hypothesis in young adolescents. Journal of Anxiety
Disorders, 7, 223-233.
Jolly, J. B, Aruffo, J. F., Wherry, J. N., & Livingston, R.
(1993). The utility of the Beck Anxiety Inventory with inpatient
adolescents. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 7, 95-106.
Klavora, P. (1974). State anxiety and athletic competition.
Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Alberta-Edmonton.
Kleine, D. (1990). Anxiety and sport performance: A meta-analysis.
Anxiety Research, 2, 113-131.
Krane, V., Williams, J., & Feltz, D. L. (1992). Path analysis
examining relationships among cognitive anxiety, somatic anxiety, state
confidence, performance expectations, and golf performance. Journal of
Sport Behavior, 15, 279-295.
Leonard, W. M. (1986). Exploitation in collegiate sport: The views of
basketball players in NCAA Divisions I, II, and III. Journal of Sport
Behavior, 9, 11-30.
Mahoney, M. J. (1989). Psychological predictors of elite and
non-elite performance in Olympic weightlifting. International Journal of
Sport Psychology, 20, 1-12.
Mahoney, M. J., Gabriel, T. J., & Perkins, T. S. (1987).
Psychological skills and exceptional athletic performance. Sport
Psychologist, 1, 181-199.
Menzer, J. (1993, May). The playoffs: It's a whole new ballgame,
Basketball Digest, 7, 18-21.
Rawson, H. E. (1992). The interrelationship of measures of manifest
anxiety, self-esteem, locus of control, and depression in children with
behavior problems. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 9, 319-329.
Seligman, M. E. P. (1975). Helplessness: On depression, development,
and death. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
Seligman, M. E. P. (1991). Learned optimism. New York: Alfred A.
Knopf.
Somer, E., & Klein, E. (1993). MMPI profiles of patients with
panic disorder and generalized anxiety disorder: Relationship to
diagnosis and time since onset: Erratum. Journal of Psychiatry and
Related Sciences, 30, 60.
Tambs, K., & Mourn, T. (1993). How well can a few questionnaire
items indicate anxiety and depression? Acta Psychiatrica Scandivica, 87,
364-367.
Tukey, J. W. (1984). The collected works of John W. Tukey. Belmont,
CA: Wadsworth Advanced Books and Software.
Williams, D. A., & Jenkins, J. O. (1986). Role of competitive
anxiety in the performance of Black college basketball players.
Perceptual and Motor Skills, 63, 847-853.