首页    期刊浏览 2025年12月24日 星期三
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Bill Dunn: Neither Free Trade Nor Protection: A Critical Political Economy of Trade Theory and Practice.
  • 作者:Stilwell, Frank
  • 期刊名称:Journal of Australian Political Economy
  • 印刷版ISSN:0156-5826
  • 出版年度:2015
  • 期号:June
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:Australian Political Economy Movement
  • 摘要:Neither Free Trade Nor Protection: A Critical Political Economy of Trade Theory and Practice
  • 关键词:Books;Free trade

Bill Dunn: Neither Free Trade Nor Protection: A Critical Political Economy of Trade Theory and Practice.


Stilwell, Frank



Bill Dunn

Neither Free Trade Nor Protection: A Critical Political Economy of Trade Theory and Practice

Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2015, 227pp.

Bill Dunn has established a strong reputation as an analyst of international and global economic issues with his previous books Global Political Economy: a Marxist Critique (Pluto Press, London, 2009) and The Political Economy of Global Capitalism and Crisis (Routledge, Abingdon, 2014). In this latest book he criticises the influential claims about the universal benefits of free trade and rival claims for blanket protection against the unfairness of trade. Rather, he says that international exchange needs to be seen in broader perspective by looking at its social, economic and historical context. He describes the standard 'free trade versus protection' dichotomy as an example of what Bordieu terms doxy or doxa, a conservative terrain of debate that pushes more important concerns from sight. He wants to bring back in the Marxian emphasis on production and to re-focus on the class, gender and ecological implications of trade. The latter implications do not loom large in the book, however, because its main concern is with an assessment of the currently dominant theories and policy stances. As such, it is a powerful critique. Dunn is particularly clear in explaining the history of ideas about trade, presenting summaries and careful consideration of the posited arguments.

About halfway through the book there is a significant shift as it turns to the empirical evidence. International comparative data is presented on (1) trade and economic growth, (2) factor endowments, trade and growth, and (3) trade and economic inequalities. In each case the statistical evidence is notably underwhelming. This is not necessarily a weakness: on the contrary, negative or inconclusive results in statistical work can be powerful in showing the hollowness of over-generalised claims. That is the case here. Because Dunn's statistical work produces few strong correlations it helps to show the shaky empirical foundations underpinning claims about the benefits of trade. For this reviewer at least, it therefore reinforces the scepticism about politicians advocating trade agreements, such as the recent China-Australia Free Trade Agreement and the Trans Pacific Partnership. These agreements, and the econometric estimates on which claims about their macroeconomic benefits are based, are not specifically analysed in the book because Dunn's concerns are broader. He wants to make the case for looking beyond simplistic notions about the benefits of exchange to more fundamental concerns about production relations within different countries and global capitalism. This would put class and power more centrally in the political economic spotlight.
联系我们|关于我们|网站声明
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有