Bill Dunn: Neither Free Trade Nor Protection: A Critical Political Economy of Trade Theory and Practice.
Stilwell, Frank
Bill Dunn
Neither Free Trade Nor Protection: A Critical Political Economy of
Trade Theory and Practice
Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2015, 227pp.
Bill Dunn has established a strong reputation as an analyst of
international and global economic issues with his previous books Global
Political Economy: a Marxist Critique (Pluto Press, London, 2009) and
The Political Economy of Global Capitalism and Crisis (Routledge,
Abingdon, 2014). In this latest book he criticises the influential
claims about the universal benefits of free trade and rival claims for
blanket protection against the unfairness of trade. Rather, he says that
international exchange needs to be seen in broader perspective by
looking at its social, economic and historical context. He describes the
standard 'free trade versus protection' dichotomy as an
example of what Bordieu terms doxy or doxa, a conservative terrain of
debate that pushes more important concerns from sight. He wants to bring
back in the Marxian emphasis on production and to re-focus on the class,
gender and ecological implications of trade. The latter implications do
not loom large in the book, however, because its main concern is with an
assessment of the currently dominant theories and policy stances. As
such, it is a powerful critique. Dunn is particularly clear in
explaining the history of ideas about trade, presenting summaries and
careful consideration of the posited arguments.
About halfway through the book there is a significant shift as it
turns to the empirical evidence. International comparative data is
presented on (1) trade and economic growth, (2) factor endowments, trade
and growth, and (3) trade and economic inequalities. In each case the
statistical evidence is notably underwhelming. This is not necessarily a
weakness: on the contrary, negative or inconclusive results in
statistical work can be powerful in showing the hollowness of
over-generalised claims. That is the case here. Because Dunn's
statistical work produces few strong correlations it helps to show the
shaky empirical foundations underpinning claims about the benefits of
trade. For this reviewer at least, it therefore reinforces the
scepticism about politicians advocating trade agreements, such as the
recent China-Australia Free Trade Agreement and the Trans Pacific
Partnership. These agreements, and the econometric estimates on which
claims about their macroeconomic benefits are based, are not
specifically analysed in the book because Dunn's concerns are
broader. He wants to make the case for looking beyond simplistic notions
about the benefits of exchange to more fundamental concerns about
production relations within different countries and global capitalism.
This would put class and power more centrally in the political economic
spotlight.