Nichole Georgeou: Neoliberalism, Development and Aid Volunteering.
Cahill, Rowan
Nichole Georgeou Neoliberalism, Development and Aid Volunteering
Routledge, New York, Oxford, 2012, pp. xviii + 239, hardback edition
$188.
As Nichole Georgeou explains at the start of her book, the
gestation of this study was her immersion and experiences in the field
of aid volunteering in Japan and North Vietnam (pp.xv-xviii). This was
during the early 1990s, when she was in her early twenties; they were
experiences that left her asking huge moral, ethical, political
questions about volunteering.
It was a questioning that brought her back to Australia, and
eventually to academia. This book is the result of her facing down these
demons, unpacking them intellectually to find answers and solutions. In
the process she validates the work of NGOs and on-the-ground civilian
volunteers, and seriously questions the aims and priorities of state led
aid initiatives.
Pricey though it is, Neoliberalism, Development, and Aid
Volunteering was not intended by its author to simply become a library
shelf-dweller, career enhancer, or footnote-quarry, though it will
become the latter, such is the quality of the work, its breadth of
scholarship, its insights and challenges. Georgeou intended her work to
be used, to challenge and to help formulate aid/volunteering approaches
and policies at individual and organisational levels, in what is
globally a multi-billion dollar economic sector (p.xviii). This is a
sector which makes claims to altruism and humanitarianism, utilises the
input of growing numbers of volunteers, but is increasingly volatile,
conditional, militarised, privatised, and politically riven.
Neoliberalism, Development, and Aid Volunteering is an enormously
complex text, an interdisciplinary blend of history, politics,
sociology, social anthropology, and ethnography. At times the author
reaches back to the 18th century to understand the philosophical,
economic and political roots of the contemporary/current situation she
explores. Georgeou lays out her case and develops her account with
nuanced scholarship. That said, she avoids the coded and cold
impenetrability of much academic writing, and her work is at once
scholarly, personal, and accessible to non-specialists.
Given the complexity and intellectual breadth of her work, it is
difficult to summarise the paradigm she addresses, but believe I do
justice as follows: individual and organisational volunteer impulses and
empathies to 'do good' internationally have, since the 1970s,
been variously harnessed and transformed by neoliberal understandings
and processes to serve the agendas of global capitalism and the national
interests of donor-state agendas, what Georgeou broadly terms "a
wider hegemonic project of global governance" (p.55).
This is a complex, multi-faceted process, one encouraging a
symbiotic relationship between donor organisations and processes, and
the problems being addressed. In turn this encourages the development of
a self-perpetuating volunteer industry, promoting "citizenship
without politics" (p.74) in recipient communities/sites, the
neoliberal agendas masked and camouflaged by the language of
humanitarianism. In this situation there must be human
'casualties' of personal, psychological, political
kinds--amongst those who in good faith volunteer to 'do good'
in the world, and amongst aid recipients, all of whom are, in effect,
being groomed as pawns of global capitalism.
There are two dynamic aspects of Georgeou's study. First is
the mainstay of the book: a micro-study of the Australian International
Volunteer Sending Association, Palms Australia, an NGO with over 50
years experience in aid volunteering. In this she explores the tensions
in, and pressures on, an aid/volunteer organisation and its integrity,
one in the field with a Christian-based humanitarian impetus. Using the
micro-study as her constant reference point, she launches out to examine
macroglobal perspectives and contexts.
Related to this is data sourced from interviews she conducted in
20062009 with Palms volunteers with recent experience of working in
Timor-Leste and Papua New Guinea. Georgeou's sensitive and nuanced
treatment of this material reflects her concerns for the safety and the
broad welfare, including psychological aspects, of volunteers (Chapters
4, 5, 6). Not only this. Georgeou demonstrates the ways aid programmes
involve complex relationships between aid givers/suppliers and aid
recipients. Power, perceptions, histories are involved here, and
Georgeou's study is also concerned with the human, cultural,
psychological, political welfare of the recipients or targets of
aid/volunteering programmes and efforts (pp.155-166).
Georgeou's book is radical. She understands matters pertaining
to class and hegemony. Then there is her stance as a scholar.
Biographically, she came to academia late, and did not take the
well-beaten path of swapping school for campus; thus she avoided the
institutional grooming and timidification that often ensnares those who
travel this path. Rather she models engaged scholarship. The scholar is
not some sort of seminarian elitistly dealing with 'higher
things', but seeks rather to engage with the wider world beyond the
academy, which in Georgeou's case is the world of human dignity,
human rights, social justice.
Add to this her forensic account of the ways in which neoliberalism
is embedded in modern aid/development programs, which, along with
'new managerialism', comprises a form of imperialism, tying
aid/volunteering recipients to the economic and strategic imperatives of
donor states, the managerialism both facilitating and camouflaging the
ideological and the political. Citizenship based on consumerism (p.50)
is promoted, amongst aid volunteers and aid recipients, at the expense
of ideas of "responsible citizenship and collective
endeavours" (p. 74).
Radical too is Georgeou's conception and vision of civil
society, which is at the heart of her thinking, and advocacy. Civil
society is a social construct, a social space, at once democratic and
participatory, in which individuals variously clash, struggle, argue,
and agree. It is a space in which the individual is empowered to act
publicly. Civil society is about people, individuals, human beings, and
not about units to be manipulated for state imperatives, or conceived of
as foot-soldiers for economic growth.
From my reading of Georgeou's book, I sense much anger and
passion guiding her text. But instead of the mailed fist, which is
there, she builds her case with velvet gloves. Her book is a significant
contribution to the growing literature on the embeddeness of
neoliberalism, and she is a voice that should be heard.