首页    期刊浏览 2024年11月24日 星期日
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Lenin y la "cuestión nacional". Más allá del existencialismo y del constructivismo
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Juan Ignacio Castien Maestro
  • 期刊名称:Nómadas. Revista Crítica de Ciencias Sociales y Jurídicas
  • 印刷版ISSN:1578-6730
  • 出版年度:2015
  • 卷号:39
  • 期号:3
  • 页码:19-110
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad Complutense
  • 摘要:Lenin's analysis of the 'national question' shows numerous virtualities from a theoretical and political perspective. We are going to examine some of the theoretical conceptions which seem to underlie his view on the national question. In our opinion, these conceptions are a commendable work since they represent an alternative to the dilemma of essentialism and constructivism through which the social contemporary thinking has often fluctuated. Whereas essentialism tends to consider the national fact as a reality by nature and since time immemorial, constructionist approaches like those of Benedict Anderson and Ernest Gellner have insisted on its relatively recent political construction nature. Despite its unquestionable merits, this approach has often fallen into an excessively artificial perspective. According to it, the fabrication of any national identity would be possible with the appropriate skills to do so. Somehow, while essentialism refers to a metaphysical and substantivist, anti-dialectical approach, constructivism is very reminiscent of the old subjective idealism which believed that reality could be recreated by the individuals with almost complete liberty. For that reason, an approach like that of Lenin which conceives the national question as a long-term historical fact, and only politically manipulable to a very limited extent, could be of great use for materialist theoretical approaches. Some thinkers such as Maxime Rondinson and Pierre Vilar have shown this up.
  • 关键词:Lenin;nation;essentialism;constructivism;Lenin;nacionalismo esencialismo;construccionismo.
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有