Pacific Rim economic conferences.
Brada, Josef C.
For the past 3 years, the Association for Comparative Economic
Studies has cooperated with the Japanese Association for Comparative
Economics, the Korean Association for Comparative Economics and the
Society for the Study of Emerging Markets to organize conferences
dealing with the economic problems facing the economies bordering on the
Pacific Ocean. The first conference was held in Honolulu, Hawaii, the
second at Seoul National University and the third in Waikoloa, Hawaii. A
number of papers from these conferences were published individually in
previous issues of Comparative Economic Studies and others in a
symposium in the Journal of Comparative Economics in May 2014.
In this symposium, we present two papers that are based on the
keynote presentations at the third Pacific Rim Conference held in May
2014 and one paper that was presented at the conference. The first
paper, by Jan Fait and Vladimir Tomsik, is entitled 'Impact and
Implementation Challenges of the Basel Framework for Emerging,
Developing and Small Economies'. While the Basel III framework for
bank regulation is intended to strengthen the global financial system,
its design was in many ways driven by the experiences and needs of banks
in large developed economies. The authors discuss how the application of
the Basel III framework is to be achieved in small, less developed
countries, many of which are to be found in the Pacific Rim region, and
the special problems that banks and regulators in these countries will
face as they begin to implement the new regulatory regime.
The second paper, by Michael Alexxev and Andrey Cerniavsky,
examines the effects of oil revenues on economic growth. In order to
hold institutions and taxes constant, a problem that bedevils
inter-country comparisons, they use data for oil-producing and non-oil
producing states in the United States and for regions of Russia. Their
paper, 'The Effect of Oil on Regional Growth in Russia and the US:
A Comparative Analysis' shows that, because oil revenues in US
states are not taxed away by the Federal government, these states
enjoyed faster growth as a result of their oil resources. In Russia,
however, the central government taxed away the marginal gains in oil
revenues, and oil-producing regions did not experience greater growth as
the result of booming oil prices. The paper thus represents an
innovative and important contribution to the literature linking natural
resource abundance and economic growth. The third paper, 'Effects
of Privatization on Exporting Decisions: Firm-Level Evidence from
Chinese State-Owned Enterprises' is by Yasuyuki Todo, Tomohiko Inui
and Yuan Yuan. The authors use firm-level data for a panel of Chinese
firms to investigate whether privatization increases the likelihood that
firms will undertake export activities. They identify a number of
channels through which privatization can influence firms' export
decisions, some of which encourage exports and others which retard them.
Nevertheless, it appears that idiosyncratic firm-specific
characteristics are more important than privatization in increasing
firms' propensity to export.
We hope to publish additional papers from the Pacific Rim
Conferences in future issues of Comparative Economic Studies.
doi:10.1057/ces.2014.32
JOSEF C BRADA
Department of Economics, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ
85287-3806, USA.
E-mail: josef.brada@asu.edu