An innovative approach for integrating the Sarbanes Oxley act into the undergraduate business curriculum.
Elson, Raymond J. ; O'Callaghan, Susanne ; Alleyne, Beverley J. 等
ABSTRACT
The Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 or "SOX" has permanently
changed the way the business community operates. As a result, it is
important for business students to understand this legislation so that
they can add value to future employers. Currently SOX is seen as an
accounting rule and so is taught to accounting majors and not business
students. This paper offers an alternative approach to teaching SOX, as
we believe that SOX is a business issue not only an accounting issue. We
firmly believe that all business students should be exposed to the
significant requirements of the Sarbanes Oxley Act as required for all
management in publicly traded companies. Resources are provided to help
all business instructors increase their knowledge of this legislation to
ensure that SOX is fully integrated into the business school culture.
INTRODUCTION
"SOX" refers to the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 (the
"Act") that was enacted into law by the United States Congress. It applies to all Securities and Exchange registrants (i.e.,
public companies) and their external auditors. The key sections of the
law includes requirements for (a) the establishment of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board or PCAOB, (b) Auditor Independence,
(c) Corporate Responsibility, and (d) Enhanced Financial Disclosures.
From first glance this might lead one to believe that SOX is of interest
only to accounting professionals. In reality, most professionals in all
publicly traded companies are affected by SOX and they should be aware
of what their responsibilities are under the Act. This article is meant
to acquaint those who need to know about SOX and its place in a
university business curriculum: business deans, business faculty and
book publishers.
The SOX Act resulted from the mounting accounting and corporate
scandals in the late 1990s and early 2000s. These scandals resulted in
the loss of investor confidence in corporate financial reporting. The
bad news was nonstop as firms such as Adelphia Communications, Global
Crossing, Rite Aid, Xerox and Tyco revised their earnings reports to
reflect the impact of earnings management, management fraud and other
'creative accounting' practices. As a result, SOX was passed
into law and signed by Congress and the President in record time.
Perhaps the two organizations that had the biggest impact on the
passage of SOX were Enron and WorldCom. Management fraud at Enron forced
the company to file for bankruptcy protection in December 2001, the
largest bankruptcy in the country at that time. This company reported
assets of approximately $62 billion and spectacular and consistent
earnings growth for many years. However, management inflated earnings by
approximately $600 million for the six years prior to its bankruptcy
filing. Seven months later, Enron's bankruptcy filing was
overshadowed by the collapse of WorldCom in July 2002. This company,
with $100 billion in assets, was forced into bankruptcy by a massive
management fraud. Both Enron and WorldCom were given clean audit reports
that were distributed to the investment community for many years with
the underlying financial statements audited by Arthur Anderson.
With the mounting bad news reported by these premier companies
whose financial statements were audited by the Big Five accounting
firms, the investing public demanded some reform from the legislators to
bring credibility to corporate financial reporting. The Sarbanes Oxley
Act was enacted into law in response to this demand.
OVERVIEW OF SOX
SOX was implemented to strengthen and improve corporate
responsibility. The area of corporate responsibility should be of
interest to all business students, since corporate responsibility
affects all levels of upper management in all public companies. This
includes accountability by executives, boards of directors, and
auditors. Another purpose of the Act was to improve companies'
communications to investors regarding their activities and the financial
climate, again an area not just relegated to accounting personnel.
There is now a clear requirement for all members of the audit
committee to be independent members of the board of directors and not
management personnel of the corporation. Section 302 of SOX requires the
Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO) of each
company to make specific certifications in their quarterly and annual
reports. These individuals face significant financial penalties and/or
long prison terms for making false certifications. As a result, these
executives must rely on personnel throughout the organization to assist
in this certification process. Today's business students will not
only be part of the SOX process in the future, but will be the future
executives responsible for corporate governance in their companies.
The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977 placed the responsibility
of the organization's internal controls on management. Section 404
of the SOX Act now requires that public companies' annual reports
include an internal control report specifically stating that management
is responsible for establishing and maintaining an effective system of
internal control, and management's assessment of the effectiveness
of its controls. The external auditor is specifically responsible for
attesting to management's internal control environment and for
issuing a separate report on the effectiveness of those controls.
Business students should have a working understanding of the
implementation issues faced by management in implementing and
maintaining an effective internal control structure in response to
Section 404.
CLASSROOM APPLICATION
Most courses in the business school have SOX implications. However,
SOX is often only taught in accounting courses, so accounting majors are
the only ones exposed to its requirements. Business students could
potentially leave college without working knowledge of SOX and how it
could impact them in the workplace. Appendix 1 presents a summary of the
key provisions of SOX, the related sections and the authors'
perspectives on the impact of SOX on the business curriculum. Since SOX
is far reaching, we propose the following curriculum inclusion to
increase business students' knowledge of it with special emphasis
on those areas that are subject to Section 404 attestation. Our ideas
are presented in this section and summarized in Table 1.
Business Foundation Course
This is the foundation course for introducing business students to
the operations of a typical business organization. Course content
usually includes a discussion of business cycles found in typical
organizations. Such cycles include: revenue and collection, acquisition
and expenditure, production and payroll, and finance and investment.
This is the course where the general requirements of the Sarbanes
Oxley Act should be discussed. Specifically, sections 101, 302 and 404
should be discussed in the business foundation course.
Discussions should include the reasons for the establishment of the
PCAOB and how it has affected businesses (Section 101); what is
corporate responsibility and who is responsible for the corporate
responsibility over financial reporting (Section 302); and what are
internal controls and the fact that management is responsible for
designing and operating those controls (Section 404.)
Coverage should also include an introduction to risk assessment and
the use of a control framework to assess the effectiveness of a
company's control environment. The most common control framework
used in business in the United States is the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission or the "COSO"
framework. Therefore, students should have a working knowledge of this
framework.
Marketing
Marketing majors often believe that understanding accounting
concepts is pointless since they are not involved in the financial
statement process. While this misconception was okay in the past, it is
no longer appropriate under SOX since all activities that impact
financial reporting and disclosures in an organization are now subject
to SOX Section 404 attestation. Marketing programs often include courses
(or sections of courses) on selling practices and product management.
These areas are revenue-generating activities and are critical to an
organization's success. Since they are part of the financial
reporting process these areas are considered part of the Section 404
attestation scope and marketing majors need to be able to recognize and
design controls for their areas of expertise.
In discussing these areas, instructors should ensure that students
have a good understanding of the underlying business processes and the
typical controls that exist over such processes. For instance, to
incorporate SOX in courses instructors might focus class room
discussions on the controls that should be in place in an organization
to ensure that sales made by sales personnel are (a) appropriate and (b)
reported and recorded in the general ledger.
Accounting
As financial statement preparers, accountants are impacted by all
SOX provisions especially corporate responsibility and enhanced
financial disclosures. The typical accounting program already includes
sufficient coverage of generally accepted accounting principles in such
courses as Intermediate and Advanced Accounting. However, instructors
should ensure that students are knowledgeable of the related disclosures
in their coverage of the financial statement components since they are a
critical element of SOX. For instance, the coverage of leases should
include the accounting for capital and operating leases in the financial
statements and disclosures made in the footnotes to those statements.
The Auditing and Accounting Information Systems courses typically
expose students to internal controls. Instructors should expand their
coverage in this area to include the disclosure and certification
(Section 302) and attestation (Section 404) requirements of SOX. One
suggestion is for students to complete an assignment in which they
review the SEC's website and obtain the CEO and CFO certifications
for a particular organization (certification). A Section 404 assignment
might include providing students with the description of a management
process and the controls in place as identified by management. Students
would then identify procedures they might perform to independently
validate management's controls.
Management
Managers are responsible for managing people and processes.
Therefore, management majors clearly need to understand SOX and business
processes and controls. While all areas of SOX are applicable to
management majors, the sections surrounding corporate responsibility and
enhanced financial reporting should be clearly emphasized. For instance,
SOX has placed greater responsibilities on the board of directors of
public companies to improve oversight of the organizations. Corporate
governance and the role and responsibility of boards of directors are
topics covered in the typical management curriculum. Instructors should
ensure that SOX is fully integrated in the coverage of corporate
governance issues.
In classroom discussion on the role of the board of directors,
instructors should emphasize that the audit committee is now directly
responsible for the appointment, compensation and oversight of the work
of the external auditor under SOX. Also, in discussing corporate
governance activities in an organization, management students should
complete an assignment similar to accounting students by visiting the
SEC's website and obtaining the CEO and CFO certifications for a
particular organization (certification). Instructors should then
emphasize that corporate executives are now responsible for corporate
oversight under SOX and the certification process is one way of
demonstrating this responsibility.
Information Systems/Management Information Systems (MIS)
Information systems form the backbone of any business process. A
firm cannot be Section 404 compliant unless the underlying information
systems are reliable. Instructors therefore need to ensure that SOX is
integrated into their course coverage. Potential areas in which SOX
could be discussed are the general controls in the data processing environment and the application controls over specific systems, systems
design and development (including program and system change management,
and interface controls), database management, system recovery and
information security. For instance, classroom discussion could focus on
controls that exist in system and/or database design to ensure that only
authorized personnel have access to certain system functionality.
Finance
The financial function in an organization is responsible for
investing excess funds and borrowing from creditors to cover shortages.
These activities clearly have an impact on the financial statements and
are subject to Section 404 attestation. It is imperative that finance
instructors incorporate SOX in their coverage of this subject area. For
instance, classroom discussions may include controls that exist in the
organization to ensure that investments brought or sold are reported and
recorded in the general ledger. The financial profession is also
responsible for making sure that related investment transactions are
adequately disclosed in the financial statements, including any related
footnotes.
Business Law
The legal and regulatory aspect of business is covered as part of a
required course for most business majors. Clearly, the failure of an
organization to comply with laws and regulations could have a
significant financial impact and would be reflected in the general
ledger, hence the Section 404 implication. Current business law text
includes the role of audit committees, code of ethics disclosures and
regulation of CPA firms in its coverage of SOX. Therefore, to integrate
SOX into the course, instructors could include a classroom discussion of
the above areas and its impact on an organization, as well as the
processes and controls that exists in an organization to ensure
compliance with applicable laws and regulations.
Economics
Most business students are introduced to this subject through two
courses--Macro and Micro Economics. Macroeconomics covers broad economic
activities while micro covers economic decisions on a low level such as
individual consumers. On the surface, these activities do not appear to
directly affect an organization's general ledger, so the assumption
then is that SOX coverage is not important. However, environmental
issues are topics covered in this discipline. The failure of an
organization to comply with such issues could result in fines and
penalties that are then reflected in the general ledger, hence the
Section 404 implication. Therefore, economics instructors could discuss
the processes and controls that an organization has in place to ensure
compliance with the environment issues at its various locations as part
of their discussion of SOX.
CONCLUSION
This paper presents the authors' views on the necessity for
including the Sarbanes Oxley Act into all business disciplines. It also
offers an approach that instructors can use to introduce SOX to a wider
audience of business students. Clearly, this knowledge will allow
students' to be better prepared for the demands of today's
work environment. We believe that students entering the job market with
this knowledge will have a competitive advantage over their colleagues.
One challenge is to ensure that instructors have the appropriate
knowledge of SOX to share with their students. There are a number of
resources available for instructors to learn more about SOX and PCAOB.
Such resources include (i) the summary and details of SOX on the
AICPA's and SEC's websites (www.aicpa.com) and (www.sec.gov),
and (ii) the role and responsibilities of the PCAOB's at its
website (www.pcaobus.org). By obtaining knowledge of SOX and sharing it
with students, instructors will ensure that SOX is truly not just
something we wear, but something we teach.
REFERENCES
Arens, A.A., Elder, R.J. & Beasley, M.S. (2004). Overview of
the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 and other changes in auditing and the
public accounting profession. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Pearson/Prentice
Hall
Barnes, A.J., Dworkin, T.M. & Richards, E.L. (2006). Law for
business, (9th edition). New York: McGraw Hill/Irwin
Czaja, R. (2005, November Supplement). Should Sarbanes-Oxley
reforms extend to nonpublic companies? The CPA Journal. Retrieved August
28, 2006 from www.cpaj.com.
Raymond J Elson, Valdosta State University
Susanne O'Callaghan, Pace University
Beverley J Alleyne, Belmont University
Shirley Bernal, AXA Equitable
John P. Walker, Queens College--CUNY
Appendix 1: Impact of the Sarbanes Oxley Act on the Business
Curriculum
Business Curriculum
The
Sarbanes-
Oxley Act
of 2002
(Key Pro- Marke- Accoun- Manage-
visions) Related Sections ting ting ment
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB)
Section 101--Establishment x x x
of PCAOB
Section 102--Registration x
with PCAOB
Section 103--Auditing x
Standards
Section 104--Inspections of x
Registered Public Accounting
Firms
Section 105--Investigation x x
and Disciplinary Proceedings
Auditor Independence
Section 201--Services x x
outside the scope of prac-
tice of auditors
Section 203--Audit Partner x x
Rotation
Section 204--Audit Reports x x
to Audit Committees
Section 206--Conflicts of x x
Interest
Section 207--GAO Study on x x
the Mandatory Rotation of
Audit Partners
Corporate Responsibility
Section 301--Pubic Company x x x
Audit Committees
Section 302--Corporate x x x
Responsibility for Financial
Reports
Section 303--Improper x x
Influence on Conduct of
Audits
Enhanced Financial Disclosures
Section 404--Management x x x
assessment of Internal
Controls
Section 407--Disclosure of x x
Audit Committee Financial
Expert
Business Curriculum
The
Sarbanes-
Oxley Act
of 2002 Infor- Busi Eco-
(Key Pro- mation Fin- ness no-
visions) Related Sections Systems ance Law mics
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB)
Section 101--Establishment x x x x
of PCAOB
Section 102--Registration
with PCAOB
Section 103--Auditing
Standards
Section 104--Inspections of
Registered Public Accounting
Firms
Section 105--Investigation x
and Disciplinary Proceedings
Auditor Independence
Section 201--Services
outside the scope of prac-
tice of auditors
Section 203--Audit Partner
Rotation
Section 204--Audit Reports
to Audit Committees
Section 206--Conflicts of
Interest
Section 207--GAO Study on
the Mandatory Rotation of
Audit Partners
Corporate Responsibility
Section 301--Pubic Company x x x x
Audit Committees
Section 302--Corporate x x x x
Responsibility for Financial
Reports
Section 303--Improper
Influence on Conduct of
Audits
Enhanced Financial Disclosures
Section 404--Management x x x x
assessment of Internal
Controls
Section 407--Disclosure of
Audit Committee Financial
Expert
Table 1: Proposed Coverage of SOX in the Business Curriculum
Examples of Areas impacted by
Discipline SOX--Classroom Emphasis
Business Foundation Course Overview of business processes (e.g.
(general business course) revenue cycle)
Introduction to the Sarbanes Oxley Act
Introduction to Risk Assessment and
Internal Control
Marketing Product development/management
Sales practices
Accounting Financial statement preparation and
disclosure controls
CEO/CFO certifications (Section 302)
Management assessment of Internal Controls
(Section 404)
Management Corporate governance (e.g., Oversight
function of the board of directors)
Information Systems (MIS) Systems design and development (including
program and system change management,
interface controls)
Database management
System recovery
Finance Investment decisions (purchases/sales),
Borrowings
Business Law Legal and regulatory issues
Economics Environmental issues