Teixeira, Carlos (author, editor) and Wei Li (editor).: The Housing and Economic Experiences of Immigrants in U.S. and Canadian Cities.
Jones, Craig E.
Teixeira, Carlos (author, editor) and Wei Li (editor).
The Housing and Economic Experiences of Immigrants in U.S. and
Canadian Cities.
Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2015.
384 pages.
ISBN-13: 978-1442650350
The Housing and Economic Experiences of Immigrants in US and
Canadian Cities (THEE), contains eleven chapters of original research
from 18 contributors who examine how immigration intersects with housing
and economic integration in North American cities. Kobayashi (Preface)
argues that, "Immigration presents some of the most pressing
social, cultural and public policy issues in both the United States and
Canada," and the editors assert that this is the first scholarly
volume that adopts a comparative approach to both the housing and
economic experiences of urban immigrants.
Contributors employ a diversity of methods, ranging from
multivariate logistic regressions, to simple descriptive statistics,
interviews, focus groups, and landscape analysis. The chapters that
adopt an exclusively quantitative approach lend themselves well to a
comparative analysis of Canadian and US census data at national and
metropolitan area scales, whereas the more qualitative studies tend to
focus on a particular geographical area, such as one or more
neighbourhoods within a city in either the US or Canada. A notable
exception is the somewhat frustrated efforts of Li and Lo (Chapter 12)
to interview an equal number of immigrant entrepreneurs in Vancouver, BC
and San Francisco, CA.
THEE provides valuable information for scholars, policy makers,
immigration services professionals, urban planners, and upper level
students. I expect that the wide range of research methods will make
elements of this book appealing to a broad audience, but it is the rare
individual that will find every chapter to be accessible. Visual aids
are effectively used to communicate the findings of some of the more
rigorously quantitative chapters. Detailed literature reviews inform the
reader of the development of theory regarding processes of immigrant
integration and provide an excellent synopsis of the literature
regarding trends in the housing and economic experiences of urban
immigrants in both countries. Case studies offer contemporary insight
into the lived immigrant experience of housing, employment, and
entrepreneurship. As such, it is an excellent resource to learn about
past and current understandings of the processes through which
immigrants integrate into the housing markets and economies of cities in
the US and Canada.
By focusing on the housing and economic experiences of immigrants,
the editors have brought together three tremendously complex fields of
study, and organizing these fields into a coherent volume requires a
great deal of thought. THEE is divided into two parts: Part One is
focused on the housing experience while Part Two addresses the economic.
Teixeira (Introduction to Part One) explains that Part One considers the
interrelated aspects of immigrants 'housing experience through
seven conceptual areas: 1) housing needs, 2) copings strategies, 3)
housing career trajectories, 4) inequality in homeownership, 5) loss of
affordable rental housing, 6) residential segregation, and 7)
immigrants' effects on housing markets. These interrelated aspects
are organized according to three research themes: a) housing
inequalities and homeownership, b) housing careers, social networks, and
gentrification, and c) housing suburban immigrants and policy
implications. In practice this is expressed as two chapters of analyses
of quantitative data at national and/or metropolitan area scales,
followed by four chapters of qualitative case studies and some spatial
descriptive statistics. Yu (Chapter 7) deserves special recognition for
a particularly compelling integration of interviews with quantitative
data. Although Mirion (Introduction to Part Two) makes no such claim
that Part Two is organized according to these conceptual areas or
research themes, the structure follows that of Part One; two
quantitative chapters followed by three case study chapters that contain
a blend of descriptive statistics and qualitative methods. In the
Conclusion, Frazier (Chapter 13) offers an alternative set of concepts
and themes as a way to think about this volume in its entirety. In doing
so he puts the original research presented in conversation with previous
scholarly work. This is an excellent end of the book as it highlights
the various ways that these complicated fields (immigration, housing,
and economic integration) can be brought together to gain new insight.
The goal of THEE is to present and encourage the comparative study
of immigration in Canadian and US cities, so it is important to draw
attention to a key difference in the source of authors'
quantitative data for Canada and the US. All of the studies that used
census data for the US (with the exception of Haan and Yu, Chapter 3)
drew from the 2010 US Census, whereas census data for Canada was drawn
from the 2006 Canadian Census. A notable exception to this was Li and
Lo's (Chapter 12) use of the recently introduced 2011 Canadian
National Household Survey (NHS) for some basic descriptive statistics
for the Vancouver CMA. Darden (Chapter 2) acknowledges that the temporal
mismatch between the 2006 Canadian Census and the 2010 US Census is a
limitation of his study, but no comment is made as to why the 2011 NHS
was not used. One could speculate that data was not available at the
time research was being conducted, or that the majority of authors chose
not to use 2011 NHS data. Either possibility has implications for future
comparative US/Canada research; for the first suggests an inevitable
temporal lag; while the second calls into question the possibility of
comparative research should scholars choose not to use the NHS as a
source of data. There is no evidence to support either of the
speculations above, but a comment on this matter is notably absent from
the text.
THEE is an engaging and informative intervention in the field of
immigration research. More comparative studies of the immigrant
experience in Canada and the US are needed, and I hope that scholars
will be inspired to follow its lead.
Craig E. Jones
Department of Geography
University of British Columbia