Illness onset as status passage for people with multiple sclerosis (MS).
Vickers, Margaret H.
MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS (MS) AS LIFE TRANSITION
In this article I explore the passage that a person with multiple
sclerosis (MS) makes as they transition from one set of socially
identified circumstances to another (Mayrhofer & Iellatchitch,
2005)--that is, when they transition from the role of being a
person-without-MS to being a person-with-MS. I present this transition
as a status passage (Glaser & Strauss, 1971) involving different
interpretations, meanings and phenomena. Glaser and Strauss' (1971)
construct of the status passage is used to model the significance of
this life change for people with an onset of MS. MS is a disease that
can substantially interfere with daily routines, activities, family,
social and working lives, as well as the emotional well-being and
quality of life of those impacted (Janssens, van Doorn, de Boer, van der
Meche, Passchier & Hintzen, 2003). I claim that the onset of MS is a
status passage worthy of careful consideration for people with MS, those
around them and, especially, for the health professionals who provide
them with much needed support.
MS is a degenerative disease of the Central Nervous System (CNS)
(Kraft, Freal & Coryell, 1986; Rumrill, Roessler & Cook, 1998),
characterised by damage to the myelin sheath which insulates the white
matter tracts within the brain and along the spinal cord (Rumrill,
Tabor, Hennessey & Minton, 2000). It is often unpredictable in its
course and is frequently progressive over time. The most common
physiological symptom for a person with MS is fatigue (Kraft et al,
1986; Gregory, Disler & Firth, 1993; Rumrill et al, 1998; Koch,
Rumrill, Roessler & Fitzgerald, 2001), with many other symptoms
including diminished strength, sensory problems, reduced stamina, bowel
or bladder dysfunction, visual impairment, depression, anxiety, pain,
cognitive difficulties, and sexual dysfunction (Koch et al, 2001, p.
157; Rumrill et al, 1998; Vickers, 2008; 2009a; 2009b).
Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is one of the most prevalent neurological
disorders in the world (Rumrill et al, 1998; Rumrill et al, 2000) with
as many as 2,500,000 people in the world having MS. Approximately
500,000 people with MS can be found in the United States (Rumrill et al,
1998) and around 16,000 in Australia (MS Australia, 2005). For the
majority of people with MS--around 70 per cent--the course of the
disease is characterised by seemingly random cycles of exacerbations
(relapses) and remissions (Rumrill et al, 1998, p. 242; Vickers, 2008,
2009a, 2009b). For others, a swift and unrelenting decline in ability
can characterise their experience of the disease. For most people,
learning that they have MS will lead to significant changes in social
attitudes and expectations, life roles, potential for stigmatisation,
anticipated exposure to negative, disability-related stereotypes,
increased life challenges, and a correspondingly greater need for social
support. I claim that the onset of a disease like MS is a significant
life passage for the individual concerned that commences before they
realise they have MS. I aim to explore the lived experience of the
Illness Onset Status Passage here.
METHODOLOGY
This qualitative study was situated in Sydney, Australia.
Heideggerian phenomenology was used to capture and share the subjective
life experiences of people of people with MS, along with the meanings
held by that these individuals (Oiler, 1982; Drew, 1989). The goal of
Heideggerian phenomenology is to understand everyday practices (Benner,
1985), and the hermeneutic method outlined in Heidegger's Being and
Time (1927/1962) offered a method for the study of day-to-day human
activities. Lived experience refers to the German word Erlebnis,
literally living through something, bringing the pre-reflective
dimensions of human existence to the fore (van Manen, 2003; Raheim &
Haland, 2006). Heideggerian phenomenology underscores the importance and
value of the informant's reality and the need for the researcher to
share that reality with others (Swanson-Kauffman, 1986).
Contact was made with potential respondents through the MS Society
of New South Wales (NSW). I was invited to contact members of support
groups, which included attending meetings to explain the study and
recruit potential respondents. I also placed an advertisement in a
neurologist's office, advertising the study and inviting potential
respondents to contact me directly. I interviewed 20 respondents, with a
total of 21 interviews being conducted. During the interviews, questions
were directed toward events in these people's lives and how they
were experienced, as well as giving respondents the opportunity to
explore meaning (Raheim & Haland, 2006).
Interviews ranged from 1.5 hours to 3 hours in duration and were
guided by focus areas that shifted as the interviews progressed. Sixteen
women and four men participated in the interviews, a reasonable
representation of the sex breakdown of the MS population worldwide,
currently at around 3:1. Respondents' ages ranged from 28 to 65
years, with a mean age of 47 years. In all, there were over 43 hours of
interview data, including 35 tapes that were transcribed verbatim. This
resulted in 1, 222 pages and 335, 258 words of transcribed text. The
study was approved by the University of Western Sydney Human Ethics
Review Committee as well as the Multiple Sclerosis Society of NSW.
Pseudonyms were used for all respondents, people and organisations
mentioned during the interviews (Vickers, 2008).
Finally, I disclose to readers that, at the time of the interviews,
I had had MS for over twenty years, and had experienced varying levels
of disability over that time. During the interpretation and analysis
presented here, I realised that I could still clearly remember my first
symptoms of MS, how I had reacted, and how I had felt at the time.
Heideggerian phenomenology accepts and encourages the personal knowledge
and experience of the researcher. According to Heidegger, the
researcher's influence will determine which phenomena, experiences,
facts and relationships will enter their consciousness (Moss & Keen,
1981). The researcher's experience is also recognised as
necessarily shaping the interpretations made (Osborne, 1990). I was
operating from an "inside" perspective. As Wilmot (1975)
confirmed, an insider operates on different information and a different
perspective than one on the outside (ie one without MS). The locus of
information, whether it is inside or outside, is the first central
difference in how we attribute meanings to both our own behaviour and
the behaviour of others (Wilmot, 1975). It was my own recalled
experiences of the onset of MS that highlighted to me that this was a
status passage worthy of concern.
ILLNESS ONSET AS STATUS PASSAGE
Erikson (1964) observed the notion of a life passage by identifying
various life cycle stages. Erikson showed life unfolding for people in
an observable sequence with each new stage being marked by a
"crisis". Crisis, in this context, was not a catastrophe, but
a turning point in that person's life, often characterised by a
period of increased vulnerability (Erikson, 1964; Sheehy, 1974). Sheehy
(1974) also documented these predictable crises of adult life as
associated with the life cycle. However, unlike the life passages
described by Erikson and Sheehy, the passage that people with MS
experienced with the onset of their disease is one that is not a
necessary part of their life but which results in that person shifting
to a new life role, a new bodily awareness, and the need to develop a
whole new self and identity as a result of the transition.
I found Glaser and Strauss' (1971) notion of the status
passage more helpful to this analysis. Status passages are characterised
by important changes in behaviours and consequences for the persons
involved (Glaser & Strauss, 1971). Constituent properties of status
passages include: the potential reversibility of the passage; the shape
of the passage; its desirability; whether the passage is experienced as
a collective, in aggregate or solo; whether it is an individual or
multiple status passage; and includes the temporal aspects of social
mobility associated with many status passages (Glaser & Strauss,
1971). The notion of the status passage had also been examined with
reference to the experiences of gay men as they transitioned through
life with HIV and AIDS, where six major interrelated properties of the
status passage were identified: reversibility, temporality, shape,
desirability, circumstantiality, and multiple status passages (Lewis,
1999; Glaser & Strass, 1971). HIV/AIDS is also noted to be an
intrusive illness, with individuals affected finding that, once
diagnosed, in addition to becoming attuned to a precarious health
status, they must also learn that they are living with a highly
stigmatised illness (Lewis, 1999). I claim that this is also how it is
for people with MS.
When a person learns that they have MS, they exit from their former
role as a person-without-MS to a new health role and associated identity
of a person-with-MS. Many of the properties of the role-exit process
identified by Glaser and Strauss (1971) and, later, Ebaugh (1988) are
relevant to this analysis: questions around the voluntariness of the
passage, the centrality of the role, its potential reversibility and
duration, the degree of control that the bearer has, the desirability of
the new role, and the degree of awareness that the bearer has about the
new role and all that is associated with it. Certainly, there are likely
to be numerous potential status passages for people as they journey
through their new lives with MS, many of them negative and very
challenging. However, I am concerned here with what I consider to be the
first status passage associated with having MS. I have termed this the
Illness Onset Status Passage. Importantly, much of this status passage
takes place prior to the person knowing they have MS, or knowing much
about MS. The Illness Onset Status Passage is the
"journey-before-the-journey" of living with MS. Of interest,
for a person who experiences the onset of MS, there is no exit from
their new role. At the time of writing, there is no cure for MS and so,
correspondingly, no possible exit from this role except in death.
Following Glaser and Strauss' (1971) and Lewis' (1999)
analyses of the properties of status passages, I examined the
experiences reported to me surrounding the onset of MS, including the
onset of symptoms and news of their diagnosis (1). Following Glaser and
Strauss' (1971) analysis, the relevant properties of the status
passage for the Illness Onset Status Passage that I am proposing
include: the centrality of the role, shape of the passage,
(ir)reversibility, (in)voluntariness, (un)desirability, degree of
awareness of the passage, and the characterisation of this as a single
(or multiple) status passage described below:
* Respondents shifted in role, forever, from being a
person-without-MS to being a person-with-MS;
* The status passage and associated change in health status would
affect relationships, social standing, careers, finances, future life
choices, stress and anxiety levels, quality of life, and health and
wellness;
* The status passage was irreversible;
* The status passage was involuntary;
* The status passage was undesirable;
* The status passage was highly stigmatised;
* The status passage was not socially desirable;
* The experience of the status passage was shaped by initial
symptoms, including the seriousness of those symptoms, the speed of
onset, and the amount of initial life disruption that resulted;
* The experience of the status passage was shaped by the
respondents' lack of awareness, both of having MS, and what having
MS might mean;
* Respondents had no control over the illness onset;
* Respondents' were engaged in an individual, single status
passage (just one of the multiple status passages that would accompany a
future life with MS).
In the sections below I have showcased the lived experience of
Illness Onset Status Passage for people with MS as they moved to a new
life where all the rules had changed--often, with them having little, if
any, knowledge of what was going on.
LIVING THE ILLNESS ONSET STATUS PASSAGE
An Unknown Passage: Lived as "Harmless" Symptoms
The commencement of the Illness Onset Status Passage reminded me of
the commencement of the journey experienced by people with unseen
chronic illness: this life changing journey also commenced with the
experience of initial symptoms, rather than a diagnosis (See Vickers,
2001). When respondents first began to experience symptoms of MS, they
often didn't know that anything serious was wrong. They were
sharing with me, without realising it, evidence of their
"journey-before-the-journey". For many respondents, their
Illness Onset Status Passage began with what respondents believed were
trivial, seemingly "harmless", symptoms. Certainly, these
early symptoms didn't signal the significant life changes one might
expect with the onset of a serious, potentially degenerative,
neurological disease. Respondents were experiencing what Erikson (1964)
described as a "crisis" period, not because it was immediately
dangerous, or catastrophic, but because this was a crisis that marked a
turning point in their life and signalled a period of increased
vulnerability (Erikson, 1964; Sheehy, 1974). However, many respondents
believed this to be a "harmless" beginning; their symptoms
were seemingly innocuous and, they felt, not threatening. Many remained
unconcerned, if somewhat puzzled. Marlene's "Harmless"
Symptoms began with tingling in her legs:
MV: Now what about you physically? What happened that you needed to
go to the doctor and get tested?
Marlene: Tingling in the legs ... Because I had tingling, not much
else was the problem, just the tingling. And that's why I went to
the doctors.
Rowena explained some mild difficulties walking as well as having
an unusual sensation, a result of the MS, of feeling as if she had golf
balls under her feet when walking. Of interest, Rowena didn't
immediately see a doctor when this happened. She reported being
influenced in not seeking medical advice when experiencing these early
symptoms believing, at the time, that it couldn't be anything
serious because others couldn't see that there was anything wrong
with her:
Rowena: And I ended up coming to work mostly through that because
people couldn't really see that I had anything wrong with me.
Although it did affect my walking, because the other thing I felt like I
had golf balls underneath my feet, so I felt that I was walking on sort
of uneven lumps underneath, like really big lumps.
Glen and Ned also had seemingly trivial starts to their Illness
Onset Status Passage. Glen described to me how he had been a regular
tennis player, prior to his MS diagnosis, and had found that he suddenly
couldn't run for the ball the way he used to. Glen had assumed at
the time that he was getting older, and less fit. Rather than see a
doctor, initially, Glen's response was to go out running to
increase his fitness:
Glen: Probably, one of the things that really first made me wonder
what was going on is, I played tennis and I found I couldn't run
like I used to be able to run. And that probably even went back to
little bit earlier than the 70's. And I thought at that stage,
"Yes, yes. You are getting a bit old," and so I used go out
running around the block to try and get fitter.
Of course, the problem was neither that Glen was getting older, nor
that he was unfit. He was experiencing the onset of MS symptoms but, at
the time, didn't understand what was happening to him. Ned had a
similar experience. As an avid and talented soccer player and sportsman,
Ned found that he wasn't able to kick the ball with the same power
as usual. Ned sought to improve the situation by training harder, but
nothing improved:
Ned: I used to play a lot of soccer. And I had had a break . and
when I went back I noticed that I couldn't kick the ball as far as
I used to be able to kick the ball. And I thought it was just because
I'd had a couple of years out of the game. So I went to the gym and
I started working to build up my legs to get them stronger. And despite
doing that, like quite an extensive and intensive program, I
couldn't build up my leg. I couldn't get it any stronger. And
I noticed . as the season went on I was kicking less and less in terms
of distance and power. And I still thought it was just leg strength. I
didn't think that there was anything wrong.
MV: You could still run around ok?
Ned: I could still run around and there was no problem about that,
but I just couldn't kick the ball as hard as I used to. And I just
thought it was one of those things, you know, I didn't really think
anything of it. I just thought it was something, that I'd been out
of the game too long and my leg, something's wrong with my leg and
I didn't really get it checked out by anyone because I just
didn't think it was that serious. I just thought it was [laughing]
one of those things. Tough luck!
Kate found herself walking to the left without wanting or meaning
to. She explained how this started to become evident during her morning
walks around the bay where she lived. It took her some time to really
accept that anything was wrong:
Kate: I think the first thing that I felt, and I really wasn't
aware of what was going on, was I started to feel, when I was doing my
walk around the bay, I started to feel like I was going to the left.
Like walking to the left all the time, and I didn't know what was
going on but I just had to be careful . And I thought, "Oh,
that's really strange." And then that probably lasted a good
month I'd say.
Marlene, Kate, Rowena, Ned and Glen were all beginning an Unknown
Passage to a new status, identity, sense of self, and lived experience.
For them, the beginning of their passage seemed harmless, as the
physical changes were thought to be trivial. However, without them
realising it, these putative "harmless" symptoms still marked
the commencement of their Illness Onset Status Passage. Weick (1995, p.
4) described sensemaking as, literally, the making of sense (Weick,
1995, p. 4) and involving more than just interpretation of events or
experiences, but a creation of meaning (Weick, 1995, p. 8). All
respondents reported trying to interpret these initial supposed
"harmless" symptoms, but were doing so without full
information. Unfortunately, the vulnerabilities of framing, such as
incomplete information, can result in a false reality being constructed
in the minds of those trying to make sense (Vickers, 2002).
Respondents' were contrasting their new physical symptoms with
their old ways of being, resulted in them making a disjunctive passage,
which refers to situations where the individual attempts to reason or
negotiate without help or guidance (Wheeler, 1966, cited by Bradby,
1990)--they were trying to figure it out for themselves. In most cases,
they were wrong.
An Unknown Passage: Lived as Alarming Symptoms
For other respondents, their Illness Onset Status Passage commenced
with the experience of far more stark markers of a potentially serious
health problem. Their Illness Onset Status Passage commenced with
profound, alarming bodily symptoms that could not be ignored. Status
passages can include changes that can be quite startling, and which may
be accompanied by feelings of bewilderment and being overwhelmed--a kind
of reality shock (Bradby, 1990). Respondents were facing frightening and
(at this point) unexplained bodily changes that could not be ignored.
These significant MS-related changes also resulted in seismic shifts in
respondents' lives, in some cases, overnight.
For example, Meredith described cognitive problems and nocturnal
incontinence. For a woman in her early twenties, this was a shocking
experience. She described her changed cognitive abilities as
"trying to think through a pea soup fog." She also found
herself wetting the bed at night inexplicably and, despite seeing
doctors about both these problems, expressed her concern at the time
that no-one would listen to her. Meredith shared one especially
disturbing experience of forgetting who she was and not knowing how to
get home, an experience which baffled both her and her doctors:
Meredith: I said, "I can't think. I can't
concentrate. I can't find the words I need to speak. I can't
concentrate. I can't remember anything." And the biggest thing
that finally made them go and do the MRI and they said, "There is
something significantly wrong with you," was I got lost going home
one day. But I was in my own street and I didn't know where I was.
MV: Wow. Were you walking or driving? Meredith: I was driving.
MV: And you just didn't recognise where you were?
Meredith: I was in my own street. I knew enough to get to my
street. I knew my address and I knew the street that I lived in and I
got out the street directory. But I couldn't recognise anything.
And I was reading the street numbers, and I'm going, "No, the
street numbers are getting bigger. I think I'm going the wrong way.
I think I have to go the other way". And I'm going, "No.
Those are shops. There are shops here. I don't live in shops. I
have to go the other way". And I went back to the doctor's, a
psychiatrist at this stage and he said, "I think there is something
seriously wrong with you". And I said, "Hello! I've been
telling you that for two years!" Meredith's Illness Onset
Status Passage included both the anticipations and anxiety experienced
prior to knowledge and understanding of what was happening to her, but
also showing that she was making some attempt to understand the changes
taking place (Bradby, 1990). Meredith's sensemaking here involved,
specifically, the concept of invention of or creation of meaning, which
often precedes successful interpretation (Weick, 1995). We experience
events in terms of what has just occurred; sensemaking is done
retrospectively (Weick, 1995; Vickers, 2002), with meaning being
attached to these events after the fact (Schutz, 1932/1967). Meredith
was trying to make sense of what had happened to her, knowing something
was seriously wrong, but not knowing what, or how to respond.
Miranda's Unknown Passage also began alarmingly when she lost
vision in one eye completely, over just a few days:
Miranda: I had a headache for about 10 days . and the headache was
really bad. That lasted for about 10 days and then eventually,
basically, I got up to shower and go to the toilet . I thought I could
get up and make myself a cup of tea ... So I got up and I sat here and
made myself a cup of tea and I just covered my eye and then I looked out
of one eye and thought, "Oh, I can't see!" And it was
pitch black. It was like thick black smoke and I thought, "I
can't see out of that eye." Hilary's Alarming Symptoms
commenced with the loss of both motor capacity and sensation in her
legs. Within just one day, she found herself with a left leg that
didn't work at all and a right leg heading the same way. The shape
of all these women's Illness Onset Status Passage was reflected in
the speed of change and the profound impact these initial, Alarming
Symptoms had on their lives--still without them knowing what was
happening to them:
Hilary: I woke up one day. I was at university, I was in 2nd year
university, and my leg was a bit sore. I had a psych essay due, and
I'd never asked for an extension before and I thought "Oh,
what the hell." And I didn't feel right. So I found a GP,
because I'd never been sick before and didn't have someone I
regularly went to. By the time I'd got in to see him, an hour and a
half later I guess, my whole left leg wouldn't work. There was no
sensory or motor feeling, nothing. He sent me on to some specialist . He
obviously just thought, "Push her on, because I can't deal
with it." And the guy looked at me and he said, "You're
going for an MRI." Because by that time, the right leg was going as
well. So, the next morning, an MRI. That afternoon they had a look at
it, and by that time I was in a wheelchair. And they said, "Yes, we
think it is MS, definitely." There's plaques in my brain and
all the way down my spine as well.
Mary's Alarming Symptoms commenced when she found herself
unable to speak or walk:
Mary: Yes, yes. It was hard for me to speak. I needed to have two
people help me go to the doctor . I was very incapacitated and scared
... I just, I had no option but to stay in the hospital for four months,
almost four months . I wasn't able to move and I wasn't able
to speak. I had about two words. I mean, you know, may be seven or eight
words but --, MV: That's all you could say?
Mary: Yes, but I could only do one word at a time. But even so, I
could say, "Yes, or no". And it could change . I could say,
"Yes" and I didn't really mean "Yes".
Health status is a role that is central to identity (Lewis, 1999).
Where the Illness Onset Status Passage begins in such a dramatic,
frightening and profound way, even though respondents still didn't
know they had MS, they were experiencing a clear threat to their
identity and health status because of the significance, and disruptive
capacity of the initial symptoms they were experiencing. Key properties
of their Illness Onset Status Passage were now in evidence, even if
respondents still didn't know the cause. They were experiencing a
shift in health status (even if they may have thought it was temporary),
and were learning, for the first time, of the irreversibility,
involuntariness and undesirability of such a shift in status in relation
to their health. Lewis (1999) confirms that benchmarks and turning
points during a status passage serve as important markers of where a
passage is going and the speed of change that will be felt. Respondents
were living the first stage of their Illness Onset Status Passage as
serious symptoms that could not be ignored.
Incomplete Knowledge Lived as Felt Stigma
As respondents continued their Illness Onset Status Passage with
MS, at some point all respondents eventually sought help from the
medical profession and ascertained a diagnosis. At the point of
diagnosis, they changed. Their Illness Onset Status Passage found
respondents having shifted from being a person-without-MS to a
person-with-MS. The knowledge that they had MS, without necessarily
knowing what that meant for them then, or in the future, brought into
clear relief their initial symptoms, whether believed to be
"harmless" or alarming, that had been present previously, but
not understood.
The crises phase that often immediately surrounds a diagnosis is
strongly influenced by the sick person's perceptions of events as
well as the physiological manifestations of the disease (Wellard, 1998).
MS is typically a disease where the prognosis is very uncertain. It is
also an illness that is highly stigmatised. At this stage of the Illness
Onset Status Passage, respondents now faced both a great deal of
uncertainty about their illness and how it might affect them (now that
they knew they had it), as well as an overarching sense that MS was
highly stigmatised. Goffman (1963) identified the realities of the
spoiled identity or an undesired differentness, and Susman (1994, p. 16)
showed stigma to be a persistent trait for an individual or group, which
evokes negative or punitive responses. Stigma is an attribute that is
deeply discrediting (Goffman, 1974) and is a concept which captures a
relationship of devaluation rather than being a fixed attribute
(Marshall, 1994). Stigma, especially when it relates to certain forms of
illness such as MS, tends to define the bearer even though it may not be
an obvious, observable trait and stigma carries with it a general sense
of moral inferiority, culpability and depravity (Scott, 1974). Whenever
stigma is present, the devaluing characteristic is so powerful that it
can overshadow other traits and becomes the focus of personal
evaluations (Saylor, 1990; Vickers, 2001). It is unsurprising that
respondents felt so strongly, and negatively, about their newfound
illness status, even before they knew much about it. Paradoxically,
learning concrete (but incomplete) information about the existence of
their illness might have explained their initial symptoms, but only
seemed to make their experience worse.
Many respondents reacted to news of their changed illness status by
feeling stigmatised, making frequent references to stereotypical images
of wheelchairs and premature death. Miranda confirms:
MV: When you got diagnosed ... tell me how it affected you. What
did you think?
Miranda: Well, the first thing you think of is a wheelchair.
Donna also raised the image of the wheelchair while referring to a
famous Australian icon and former Olympic athlete, Betty Cuthbert, who
also has MS and who is now significantly disabled as a result. Donna
reported feeling especially stigmatised when having to share her new
found "status" with her manager at work:
MV: Yes, and how did you feel before you went in to, first of all
the manager's meeting, with your manager, and then secondly with
your group of staff? How did you feel before you went in to tell your
manager?
Donna: I was, at that point, from what I can remember, I was just
thinking my life was over anyway . all I was thinking was, "Oh my
God, Betty Cuthbert. I'll be in a wheelchair. Oh my God", you
know?
Ned also referred to these pervasive and influential stigmatising,
negative images:
MV: Did any images come in to your mind when she said MS?
Ned: I thought of death, to be honest, as the first thing, and then
I thought wheelchairs. They were the two things that I thought of and
that I still sort of, well not the death part, I still think of the
wheelchairs obviously but I don't think of dying from it. But I do
think of the disabilities.
Learning that one has a chronic and potentially disabling condition
such as MS requires the bearer to learn the politics of being a
chronically ill person in a world that is focussed on health and ability
(Wellard, 1998). We have confirmation here that the status passage of
the onset of MS is involuntary, undesirable and highly stigmatised. The
undesirable nature of having MS is linked to stereotyped (and often
flawed) images of people with MS, evident during initial reactions to
diagnosis (Lewis, 1999). Even when respondents didn't know much
about MS, what it was, or what a future with MS might hold for them, the
images they articulated reflected their immediate fear of a future that
they believed would inevitably lead to wheelchair use and/or premature
death.
Historical cultural representations of disability are a brutal
reminder of how societies concentrate on the defective or abnormal
aspects of the bodies and minds of people with disability. Historical
responses have included the display of people with deformities at
village fairs, and the public display of inmates of
"mad-houses" and institutions well into the seventeenth and
eighteenth centuries (Barnes & Mercer, 2003). Such displays evolved
into "freak shows" by the nineteenth centuries for the
public's entertainment, and the development of the so-called
"ugly laws" in the USA in the nineteenth and early part of the
twentieth century, where social restrictions were placed on those whose
physical appearance might offend or frighten "normal" people
(Barnes & Mercer, 2003; Bogdan, 1996).
When respondents learned they had MS they felt stigmatised simply
because they had MS, as reflected in their responses about wheelchairs
and premature death. Felt stigma refers, first, to feeling shame
associated with having a chronic illness (Scambler, 1984; Jacoby, 1994;
Vickers, 2002). People feel ashamed fundamentally because they see
having their stigmatising condition as amounting to an infringement
against norms relating to identity or being (Scambler, 1984). It is
stigma felt by the individual (Scambler, 1984; Jacoby, 1994; Nijhof,
1995). Unfortunately, nothing exists to protect people from the shame of
a stigmatising condition (Kleinman, 1988). For respondents in this
study, part of the Illness Onset Status Passage involved learning that
they had MS, but this new and incomplete knowledge proclaimed for them,
especially at this early stage, a reason to feel shame, a negative shift
in identity, and fearful for the future, based on the stereotypical
images of MS that continue to pervade our communities.
Living Thrownness
In the early period after diagnosis, especially, people with MS
have to cope with the uncertainty that accompanies having a potentially
very serious illness. In addition to the uncertainty associated with
previously unfamiliar symptoms, the anxiety and distress present prior
to diagnosis now carries over into life after diagnosis (Janssens et al,
2003). In a study of health-related quality of life, anxiety,
depression, and distress (ie the intrusion and avoidance of thoughts and
feelings that related to MS), it was found that recently diagnosed
people with MS showed that, even where their level of disability was
still relatively low, they evaluated their mental and physical health as
being significantly poorer on all scales compared to control groups.
They also reported significantly higher levels of anxiety (Janssens et
al, 2003).
For people with MS, their Illness Onset Status Passage can result
in a transition that places them in a "situation of
thrownness" (Heidegger, 1927/1962; Weick, 1995, p. 44)--they are,
as I describe it, Living Thrownness. This sense of
"thrownness" commences, first, as a result of them having a
lack of sufficient useful knowledge about their illness. For example,
initially, because of his lack of knowledge about MS, Glen wasn't
especially concerned when hearing that he had MS. Glen believed,
initially, that the armamentarium of modern medical remedies would
simply arrest the illness, and solve the problem. However, as knowledge
of what may have lay ahead settled with him, Glen's concerns began
to escalate:
MV: So you were 38, in the prime of your working life at that
point. When he told that you had MS, what did you think?
Glen: I really didn't know what it was, you know. I thought,
"Oh, yes, MS. OK, that's cool. He'll just give me few
tablets, I'll take the tablets and well be sweet and off I'll
go." Glen soon learned that his original ideas about having MS were
not accurate. His responses indicated that he was in the middle of a
complex situation, trying to disentangle what he knew from what he
didn't, and then making, and revising, his provisional assumptions
(Weick, 1995). Glen was Living Thrownness when he found himself unable
to easily step back and reflect on his actions or understandings. He
didn't have a stable or accurate representation of his new
situation, and he didn't know whether any interpretation he might
make was right or wrong. His comments show that he was part of the
ongoing experience of his status passage and very much "in the
middle of things" (Weick, 1995, p. 44). Glen's experience of
Living Thrownness continued as he learned that having MS signalled a
significant interruption to his ongoing life, especially for a man with
a young family to support:
Glen: Well, I guess, because I didn't know what MS was, I
probably thought it was like, you know, cancer sort of a thing; that,
you know, you've got 3 years to live, or 6 months to live or
something like that. But then he [the doctor] explained what it was and
he explained you know, "You may finish up in a wheelchair, but
that's only a small number of people in the overall", and you
know, and he was very confident about the whole thing
MV: You were pretty shocked?
Glen: Yes, pretty shocked and, you know, I wondered where it's
going to go because my wife was, at the time, was pregnant with our
second bub, so we were going to have two children.
Ned also demonstrated that Living Thrownness was difficult
initially, as he tried to take in what he had been told, having no real
knowledge of what MS was at the time, or what having it might mean for
himself, and those around him in the future:
Ned: Well, I think she [the doctor] was a bit shocked. I
didn't really say anything after she told me, because I didn't
really take it in. I couldn't really take it all in. I didn't
really know what it was or how serious it was or whatever ... I mean the
doctor had told me in the interview when she diagnosed me, "Oh,
you've got this progressive decline in your leg and it will mean
this. It could mean this; it could mean that." But I didn't
really take it in, you know. That first time I was just getting over the
shock of the first words that she said really.
Ned's Living Thrownness was evident in his confusion, lack of
understanding, and shock. Negative emotions are likely to occur when an
organised behavioural sequence (such as seeking a medical diagnosis of
new symptoms) is interrupted unexpectedly and the interruption is
interpreted as harmful or detrimental (Weick, 1995). In this case, what
Ned had believed were weak leg muscles were, instead, primary
progressive multiple sclerosis.
In the early phase after diagnosis of MS, people often experience
substantial emotional burden. Up to fifty per cent of people in one
study reported clinically relevant levels of either anxiety of stress in
the period shortly after diagnosis (Janssens et al, 2003). The Illness
Onset Status Passage would be likely to impact one's sense of self,
self-efficacy, and self-esteem. Learning the diagnosis of a chronic,
potentially disabling disease invokes coping mechanisms in direct
response to their perceived new experience of Living Thrownness. There
are often significant psychological costs associated with news of
current and future disability, many of which are based on the
able-bodied assumptions of what that might be like (Barnes & Mercer,
2003). Learning that one has a serious, chronic illness is known to
demoralise, stigmatise and threaten other life passages (for example
career paths) in that person's life (Glaser & Strauss, 1971,
pp. 114-115). Donna shared her Living Thrownness with regard to the
possibility of cognitive losses that may have arisen in the future as a
result of the MS--something she had not previously considered:
Donna: [He said:] "Have you had any cognitive issues?"
and I am like, "What? What?" And I got mad at myself because
earlier on I would've read that the MS affects your cognitive
ability, and can affect your cognitive skills. Of course it could,
because it's anywhere in your brain. But that was a piece of
information that I feel I chose to ignore. Like, you read something and
if it's so appalling to you, you don't remember it? . And
that, that killed me, that nearly killed me, really. The thought of me
losing my cognitive ability, and cognitive skills, like that is
absolutely sickening.
Coping mechanisms include the strategies people adopt as preferred
choices among the social, financial and emotional resources that might
be available to them (Barnes & Mercer, 2003). Coping with a new
diagnosis might come in the form of denial for some. Individuals will
often eschew change, whether it is with regard to the role, identity, or
self changes (Ashforth et al, 2000). Donna was avoiding thinking about
the possibility of cognitive changes that can accompany having MS. Carla
was another respondent whose experience of diagnosis was met with
minimization and denial:
MV: How did you feel [after your diagnosis] when you went home and
what happened after that? Carla: I think, I think, I was in denial for a
long time. You know oh -, MV: What sort of things do you mean?
Carla: Just, "Keep on going. Just push yourself and just, just
keep doing what you've always done and you'll be
alright." MV: Right ok. Did you talk to your husband or your
family?
Carla: Oh, yes, yes, yes. ... I, I didn't actually tell people
outside the family. I left that up to them. If anyone noticed I was sort
of walking funny or doing anything funny, or amongst the family, they
were the ones that actually said the words out loud. I couldn't, I
couldn't actually say it.
MV: Tell me why you couldn't? Tell me, did you feel
uncomfortable? Did you feel embarrassed, afraid?
Carla: I wasn't embarrassed. More afraid probably. I just felt
like I couldn't, I just couldn't say it ... I think I was
scared more because, I didn't know anything. (Carla)
Two coping tasks are relevant to all life transitions: The
management of strain and associated cognitive tasks. The management of
strain involves the invocation of coping styles that protect the
person's self-esteem and allow him or her to manage the strain
created by the transition. This might include both proactive and
reactive strategies, including shielding the self, seeking social
support, and withdrawing from the problem (Liddle et al, 2004). Both
Carla and Donna tried to cope with their Living Thrownness by minimising
and denying what was happening to them during this stage of their
Illness Onset Status Passage.
CONCLUSION
It is the political task of the social scientist--as of any liberal
educator--continually to translate personal troubles into public issues
and public issues into the terms of their human meaning for a variety of
individuals. It is his [sic] task to display in his work--and, as an
educator, in his life as well--this kind of sociological imagination
(Mills, 1959; cited in Aptheker, 1960, p. 99).
A chronic illness like MS is unpredictable, insidious, episodic and
liable to drag on for years, defying efforts by the medical profession
to control it (Curtin & Lubkin, 1990; Register, 1987). It is also
frequently associated with a descendent life trajectory as a result of
the disease progress and/or associated stigma (Vickers, 2001). Many
authors have commented on this, describing chronic illness variously as
a challenge, an enemy (Lipowski, 1970-1971; Lazarus & Folkman,
1984), a process (Freidson, 1970) and a "way of life"
(Schmidt, 1989, p. 24). Having MS encompasses all of these outcomes and
trajectories (Donoghue & Siegel, 1992).
I commenced this article by highlighting the transition that a
person with MS goes through when they transition from being a
person-without-MS to being a person-with-MS. This is presented here as a
form of status passage (Glaser & Strauss, 1971), specifically as the
Illness Onset Status Passage. This status passage involves the onset of
a disease that can substantially interfere with daily life, family
activities, social and working lives, and the emotional well-being and
quality of life of those impacted (Janssens et al, 2003). We know people
with MS experience a substantial emotional burden in the early phase
after diagnosis, many having clinically high levels of anxiety and
distress requiring the attention of health care professionals to provide
psychosocial support (Janssens et al, 2003). I seek to highlight the
lived experience of the Illness Onset Status Passage for people with MS
in an effort to display the peculiar troubles and lived experiences that
surround that, and to translate them into public issues.
The Illness Onset Status Passage for people with MS commences as An
Unknown Passage. This Unknown Passage can be experienced through what
are believed to be "Harmless" Symptoms or, conversely, as
Alarming Symptoms. In response to these symptoms, respondents all
eventually reported seeking a diagnosis, which led to their experience
of Incomplete Knowledge Lived as Felt Stigma. Then, respondents'
Illness Onset Status Passage shifted to an experience of Living
Thrownness, as they tried to cope with the turmoil brought to their
lives. Recognising what it might be like for people with MS to live this
Illness Onset Status Passage, especially realising that much of the
passage is experienced with incomplete or incorrect knowledge of the
disease, or no knowledge at all, is important for care givers to
understand.
Better understanding of this aspect of a changed life with MS is
important for various stakeholders in this picture. First, people newly
diagnosed with MS may benefit from a better understanding at the outset
of what is happening to them during the illness onset transition,
enabling them to more pro-actively participate in the management and
understanding of their condition as a result of being better informed.
Second, carers, friends and family of people with MS will also benefit
by understanding better the lived experience that accompanies having MS,
especially during the confusing and often frightening period of illness
onset. MS is an especially confounding disease, especially from the
perspective of those looking on. Many of the symptoms cannot be seen,
and may even sound strange, even fanciful, when described to a person
who hasn't experienced them. Carers, family and friends will be
able to provide more social, emotional and physical support if they are
better informed as to what the illness onset transition experience might
be like (or might have been like), including better understanding of the
potentially diverse and wide-ranging symptoms that can occur for the
people for which they are caring, as well as the psychological and
emotional challenges that may accompany them.
Third, health care professionals will also benefit immensely from
having a better understanding of the lived experience of the onset of
MS, especially those early stages prior to diagnosis. Indeed, better
understanding on the part of health care professionals (such as nurses,
counsellors and general medical practitioners) of the illness onset
experience for people with MS, may well lead to a more expeditious
diagnosis, as well as more sensitive and responsive treatment and
symptom management. Health care professionals in interaction with people
experiencing what might be the onset of MS (and who may be explaining
some rather strange and varied symptoms) would benefit immensely from
being directed to the correct medical and diagnostic professionals to
assist in gaining a swift, accurate diagnosis. Better information in
this area would enable health care professionals to maintain an
increased sensitivity to the impact and confusion that potentially
surrounds those early experiences with a disease such as MS, offering
them an ability to provide improved support, care and appropriate
service provision for people with MS.
REFERENCES
Aptheker, H. (1960). The world of C. Wright Mills. New York:
Marzani & Munsell.
Ashforth, B. E., Kreiner, G. E., & Fugate, M. (2000). All in a
day's work: Boundaries and micro role transitions. Academy of
Management Review, 25(3), 472-491.
Barnes, C., & Mercer, G. (2003). Disability. Cambridge, UK:
Polity Press.
Benner, P. (1985). Quality of life: A phenomenological perspective
on explanation, prediction, and understanding in nursing science.
Advances in Nursing Science, 8(1), 1-14.
Bogdan, R. (1996). The social construction of freaks. In R. G.
Thomson (Ed.), Freakery: Culture spectacles of the extraordinary body
(pp. 23-37). New York: New York University Press.
Bradby, M. (1990). Status passage into nursing: Another view of the
process of socialisation into nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing,
75(10), 1220-1225.
Curtin, M., & Lubkin, I. (1990). What is Chronicity? In I. M.
Lubkin (Ed.), Chronic illness: Impact and intervention (pp. 2-20).
Boston: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.
Donoghue, P. J., & Siegel, M. E. (1992). Sick and tired of
feeling sick and tired: Living with invisible chronic illness. New York:
W W Norton & Company.
Drew, N. (1989). The interviewer's experience as data in
phenomenological research. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 77(4),
431-439.
Ebaugh, H. (1988). Becoming an ex: The process of role exit.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Erikson, E. H. (1964). The golden rule and the cycle of life. In R.
W. White (Ed.) The study of lives (pp. 15-28). New York, NY, USA:
Atherton Press.
Freidson, E. (1970). Profession of medicine: A study of the
sociology of applied knowledge. New York: Harper & Row.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1971). Status passage. London:
Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled
identity. Ringwood, Victoria, Australia: Penguin Books.
Goffman, E. (1974). Stigma and social identity. In D. M. Boswell
& J. M. Wingrove (Eds.), The handicapped person in the community
(pp. 79-91). London: Tavistock Publications in Association with the Open
University Press.
Gregory, R. J., Disler, P., & Firth, S. (1993). Employment and
multiple sclerosis in New Zealand. Journal of Occupational
Rehabilitation, 3, 113-117.
Heidegger, M. (1927/1962). Being and time. New York: Harper &
Row Publishers.
Jacoby, A. (1994). Felt Versus Enacted Stigma: A Concept Revisited.
Social Science and Medicine, 38 (2), 269-274.
Janssens, A. C. J. W., van Doorn, P. A., de Boer, J. B., van der
Meche, F. G. A., Passchier, J., & Hintzen, R. Q. (2003). Impact of
recently diagnosed multiple sclerosis on quality of life, anxiety,
depression and distress of patients and partners. Acta Neurologica
Scandinavica, 708(6), 389-395.
Kleinman, A. (1988). The illness narratives. USA: Basic Books.
Koch, L. C., Rumrill, P. D., Roessler, R. T., & Fitzgerald, S.
M. (2001). Illness and demographic correlates of quality of life among
people with multiple sclerosis. Rehabilitation Psychology, 46, 154-164.
Kraft, G. H., Freal, J. E., & Coryell, J. K. (1986).
Disability, disease duration, and rehabilitation service needs in
multiple sclerosis: Patient perspectives. Archives of Physical and
Medical Rehabilitation, 67, 164-168.
Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and
coping. New York: Springer Publishing Company.
Lewis, J. (1999). Status passages: The experience of HIV-positive
gay men. Journal of Homosexuality, 37(3), 87-115.
Liddle, J., Carlson, G., & McKenna, K. (2004). Using a matrix
in life transition research. Qualitative Health Research, 74(10),
1396-1417.
Lipowski, Z. J. (1970-1971). Physical illness, the individual and
the coping process. International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine, 7,
91-102.
Marshall, G. (1994). The concise Oxford dictionary of sociology.
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mayrhofer, W., & Iellatchitch, A. (2005). Rites, right? The
value of rites de passage for dealing with today's career
transitions. Career Development International, 70(1), 52-66.
Mills, C. W. (1959). The Sociological Imagination, Oxford, UK:
Oxford University Press.
Moss, D. M., & Keen, E. (1981). The nature of consciousness:
The existential-phenomenological approach. In R. S. Valle & R. von
Eckartsberg (Eds.), The metaphors of consciousness (pp. 107-120). New
York: Plenum Press.
MS Australia (2005). MS: The mystery disease. Retrieved from
http://www.msaustralia.org.au. Retrieved: 4 June 2008.
Nijhof, G. (1995). Parkinson's disease as a problem of shame
in public appearance. Sociology, 77 (2), 193-205.
Oiler, C. (1982). The phenomenological approach in nursing
research. Nursing Research, 37(3), 178-181.
Osborne, J. W. (1990). Some basic existential-phenomenological
research methodology for counselors. Canadian Journal of Counselling,
24(2), 79-91.
Raheim, M., & Haland, W. (2006). Lived experience of chronic
pain and fibromyalgia: Women's stories from daily life. Qualitative
Health Research, 76(6), 741-761.
Register, C. (1987). Living with chronic illness: Days of patience
and passion. New York: The Free Press, A Division of Macmillan, Inc.
Rumrill, P. D., Roessler, R. T., & Cook, B. G. (1998).
Improving career re-entry outcomes for people with multiple sclerosis: A
comparison of two approaches. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 70,
241-252.
Rumrill, P. D., Tabor, T. L., Hennessey, M. L., & Minton, D. L.
(2000). Issues in employment and career development for people with
multiple sclerosis: Meeting the needs of an emerging vocational
rehabilitation clientele. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 74,
109-117.
Saylor, C. (1990). Stigma. In I. M. Lubkin (Ed.), Chronic illness:
Impact and intervention (pp. 65-85). Boston: Jones and Bartlett
Publishers.
Scambler, G. (1984). Perceiving and coping with stigmatizing
illness. In R. Fitzpatrick, J. Hinton, S. Newman, G. Scambler, & J.
Thompson, J. (Eds.). The experience of illness (pp. 203-226). London:
Tavistock Publications.
Schmidt, S. A. (1989). Living with chronic illness: The challenge
of adjustment. Minneapolis: Augsburg Publishing House.
Schutz, A. (1932/1967). The phenomenology of the social world. New
York: Northwestern University Press.
Scott, R. A. (1974). The construction of conceptions of stigma by
professional experts. In D. M. Boswell & J. M. Wingrove (Eds.), The
handicapped person in the community (pp. 108-121). London: Tavistock
Publications in Association with The Open University Press.
Sheehy, G. (1974). Passages: Predictable crises of adult life. New
York: Bantam Books Inc.
Susman, J. (1994). Disability, stigma and deviance. Social Science
and Medicine, 38(1), 15-22.
Swanson-Kauffman, K. M. (1986). A combined qualitative methodology
for nursing research. Advances in Nursing Science, 8(3), 58-69.
van Manen, M. (2003). Lived experience. In M. Lewis-Beck, A.
Bryman, & T. F. Liao (Eds.), Encyclopedia of social science research
methods (Vol. 2, pp. 579-580). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Vickers, M. H. (2001). Work and unseen chronic illness: Silent
voices. London and New York: Routledge.
Vickers, M. H. (2002). "People first--always!": Euphemism
and rhetoric as troublesome influences on organizational sensemaking.
Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 74(2), 207-217.
Vickers, M. H. (2008). Why people with MS are really leaving work:
From a Clayton's choice to an ugly passage--A phenomenological
study. Review of Disability Studies: An International Journal, 4(4),
43-57.
Vickers, M. H. (2009a). Life and work with multiple sclerosis (MS):
The role of unseen experiential phenomena on unreliable bodies and
uncertain lives. Illness, Crisis and Loss, 77(1), 7-21.
Vickers, M. H. (2009b). Why people with multiple sclerosis (MS) are
really leaving work: An exemplar case study with lessons for managers.
The 2009 Pfeiffer Management Development Annual, Section: Learning
Activities, Questionnaires and Articles Human (pp. 139-154). San
Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer (An Imprint of Wiley).
Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in Organizations. London: Sage.
Wellard, S. (1998). Constructions of chronic illness. International
Journal of Nursing Studies, 35(1-2), 49-55.
Wheeler, S. (1966). The structure of formally organized
socialization settings. In O. G. Brim & S. Wheeler (Eds.),
Socialization after childhood: Two essays. New York: John Wiley &
Sons.
Wilmot, W. W. (1975). Dyadic communication (2nd ed.). New York:
Random House.
MARGARET H. VICKERS
University of Western Sydney
(1) I consider the journey to diagnosis to be a separate, and
notable, passage that has been discussed elsewhere (eg Wellard, 1998;
Vickers, 2001). I choose not to enmesh the particularities of the
diagnostic journey as part of the Illness Onset Status Passage, because
I regard the two passages as quite distinct experiences, not to be
confused.
Table 1
Living the Illness Onset Status Passage
1. An Unknown Passage:
--Lived as "Harmless" Symptoms
--Lived as Alarming Symptoms
2. Incomplete Knowledge Lived as Felt Stigma
3. Living Thrownness