Malcolm Muggeridge: a modern pilgrim.
Walsh, Patrick J.
THE YEAR 2003 marked the centenary birth of Thomas Malcolm
Muggeridge, the nonconformist writer, journalist, BBC commentator, Roman
Catholic convert, and declared enemy of liberalism. Muggeridge saw
liberalism as being the new gospel and great consensus of the twentieth
century. In his inimitable style he defined it as a "death
wish" responsible for the destruction of the moral and cultural
traditions of Western Civilization.
I first came upon Muggeridge's writing in the early 1980s. I
espedially admired the heartfelt sincerity, analysis, and spirited style
of "The Great Liberal Death Wish," which had a tremendous
effect on me. It was like a prophetic voice in the wilderness. At the
time, I was a student at the increasingly secular, purportedly Catholic
Boston College. I cherished Muggeridge as a voice of liberation in a
civilization under siege.
"The Great Liberal Death Wish" was first published in
1970 when Muggeridge was 67 years old. He wrote well over twenty books
that are refreshing and powerful and will continue to speak to the young
of the twenty-first century and all those who look for meaning beyond
the dictates of materialistic conformity. He will continue to reveal
"the meaning that lies embedded in meaninglessness, the order
underlying confusion, the indestructible love at the heart of the
holocaust of hate, the still, small voice of truth that makes itself
heard above thunderous falsity."
Muggeridge was born at the beginning of the last century in England
in 1903. It was an age that his good friend and unappreciated author
Hugh Kingsmill (1889-1949) characterized as "New Dawnism"--a
time of faith in material progress and a worldly future without God. In
the nineteenth century the individualist Henry David Thoreau called this
"camping down on earth and forgetting heaven". The process of
secularization has continued unabated. Till Muggeridge characterized his
age as out to prove "that when Jesus said that His kingdom was not
of this world. He meant that it was."
Malcolm Muggeridge's father rose from a humble background and
became a Socialist MP.H.T. Muggeridge was part of the age and thus a
great believer in the new gospel of liberal progress. In sending his son
to Cambridge University his father hoped Malcolm would be prepared to
take a leading part as an elite member of the dawning new age.
Muggeridge would both please and perplex his father. He returned
from Cambridge with an affected high-pitched accent of his own
denomination. According to Malcolm this pleased his father because it
sounded upper class. But Malcolm, though a partisan of the left, had
already begun questioning his father's gospel of material progress.
Gregory Wolfe's recently reprinted biography of Malcolm
Muggeridge proves that Muggeridge had been attracted to Christianity as
a young man. While a student at Cambridge he met Alec Vidler
(1899-1991), who was studying to become an Anglican priest. Muggeridge
also considered this vocation. Vidler would remain a committed friend
and life-long Christian influence on Malcolm. He noticed that Muggeridge
"had a kind of genius as a talker and writer and even as a
seer."
After graduation Malcolm decided to go to India as an English
teacher. In a 1926 letter from India to his socialist reformer father,
he asserted, "that the ability to say 'Dadda' to God is
what people need more than the minimum wage."
In India he would also begin his journalistic career by writing
sketches of Indian life for the Manchester Guardian. In one piece he
wrote of a retarded boy who daily drove a flock of geese in perfect
order. One day, Muggeridge noticed the boy was absent. Another boy had
taken up the chore. This boy "carried a switch like a
sergeant-major," a "bouncing, bumptious fellow" who
shouted at the geese. The result was chaotic, with the flock dispersing
and geese getting run over by cars. Muggeridge noticed the retarded
child seemed happy with his simple task. "When his soul leaves the
poor, puny body, with its gapingly vacant face, I believe it will be
found to be a rare and beautiful soul, pleasing to its maker."
This was one of many insights he had on the opposite natures of
love and power. Love is an acceptance and a letting go while power
clutches and dominates. His book The Thirties (1940) further explored
this theme. Muggeridge would become more confirmed in his belief that
the twentieth century was a nightmare because man tried to set up an
earthy paradise based on human knowledge and power without any reference
to God. The result was a bloodletting unrivalled in all of recorded
history.
Later as the Guardian's correspondent to Moscow in 1932, he
reported on Stalin's policy of liquidation through created famine
in the Ukraine. Other correspondents like Walter Duranty of the New York
Times refused to report the truth of the situation in which seven to ten
million people perished. Those seven months in Russia changed
Malcolm's life. His reports made him an outcast among the Western
intelligentsia, confirming him on his lone spiritual journey on his lone
spiritual journey.
Muggeridge now found it difficult to gain employment. And he had a
wife and family to support! He had married Kitty Dobbs in 1927, the
niece of Beatrice and Sydney Webb of Fabian Socialist fame. Kitty and
Malcolm were their age's hippies embracing the destructive doctrine
of free love. Their marriage suffered painful infidelities by both
partners and even raised a child from one of Kitty's affairs.
The unnaturalness of human sexuality in the twentieth century and
his own fleshly sins gave Muggeridge insight into what he called the
"counter-movement": "The separation of the procreative
impulse from procreation, the down-grading of motherhood and the
up-grading of spinsterhood, and the acceptance of sterile perversions as
the equivalent of fruitful love; finally, the grisly holocaust of
millions of aborted babies, ironically in the name of quality of
life." Muggeridge came to defend Humane Vitae which was
instrumental in his later conversion to the Roman Catholic Church.
Muggeridge was one of the most gifted and original prose writers of
the twentieth century. His autobiography Chronicles of Wasted Time
(1973) is recognized as one of the beautifully written memoirs of all
time. He had been named "Thomas Malcolm" after the Victorian
Thomas Carlyle whose writing style certainly influenced Muggeridge. From
Carlyle he also imbibed a combative spirit against the forces of
materialism. Malcolm also had a non conformist Manichean strain that he
struggled to overcome. It would not be fully reconciled until his
conversion, along with Kitty, to Roman Catholicism in 1982.
In reacting against what he saw as a declining civilization
Muggeridge's writings also express a certain discontent with the
world. His reaction against the world encouraged an individualism and
strong egotism. And he could be overly pessimistic. British MP Michael
Astor once said Muggeridge had a "genius for disliking human
beings." Muggeridge himself once half seriously said:
"there's nothing in this world more instinctively abhorrent to
me than finding myself in agreement with my fellow human beings."
On his BBC programs in the sixties and seventies he exhibited a Byronic
posturing and a vein for satire that made him extremely unpopular and
hated among the left.
With G.K. Chesterton, he shared a gift for seeing paradox. He
evokes many such paradoxes in his writings at times sympathetically and
with great tenderness. But he also reveled in a magnificent derisory
satire. Muggeridge also wrote plays and fiction. But his great talent
lay in linking contemporary observation in time to eternity. This point
of intersection became a "Theatre of Fearful Symmetry."
Muggeridge was always peering behind the drama of human existence for
God. He would explain this way of seeing by quoting the English poet
William Blake:
We are led to believe a lie
When we see not Thro' the Eye.
To see with the eye goes only half way toward encompassing reality.
Microscopes, telescopes, and all instruments of modern science fall
short. To see through the eye includes the invisible spiritual dimension
of reality to which modernity, in its preoccupation with material
progress, is blind. Muggeridge in reporting on his century created a new
literary genre, a kind of eschatalogical journalism as yet
unappreciated.
He saw paradox everywhere. In an age hell bent on self-fulfillment
and the pursuit of happiness Muggeridge saw "True happiness in
forgetfullness, not in indulgence of the self; in escape from carnal
appetites not in their satisfaction."
Seeing through the eye, he saw the twentieth century, as a kind of
exact antithesis to the gospels. "It plays the Crucifixion
backwards, as it were; in the beginning was the flesh and the flesh
became Word. In the light of this Logos in reverse, the quest for hope
is the ultimate hopelessness; the pursuit of happiness, the certitude of
despair; the lust for life, the embrace of death...." Muggeridge
had a fondness for language and the sound of words. They flowed from his
lips and pen in a crescendo of an ecstatic pessimism, suddenly broken by
outbursts of contagious laughter.
While living in Ireland in 1988, I went to visit Malcolm Muggeridge
at his home in Sussex, England. I brought with me a plant for Kitty and
a book of T.S. Eliot's poems for Malcolm. Muggeridge had once
called Eliot "a death rattle in the throat of a dying
civilization." I thought this phrase in some ways marvelously apt.
But at tea I pointed out that Eliot had made a journey similar to
Malcolm's through the wasteland of the twentieth-century." And
that the poet also found peace at the "intersection of the timeless
with time."
I read him the following from Eliot's Thoughts After Lambeth
which he was much taken with--"The world is trying the experiment
of attempting to form a civilization but non-Christian mentality. The
experiment will fail; but we must be very patient in awaiting its
collapse; meanwhile redeeming the time: so that the Faith may be
preserved alive through the dark ages before us; to renew and rebuild
civilization and save the world from suicide."
Earlier I noted Muggeridge's Manichean strain, a tendency to
reject material creation as evil and flee to the world of the spirit.
But man cannot do this. Man is an in-between creature. And this is the
whole point and significance of the Incarnation that the divine Christ
became human and suffered in order to bring salvation to the world.
Both Muggeridge and Eliot were twentieth-century pilgrims. They
both had to re-learn Christianity for themselves and found they could
not rescue their age in time, but could rescue their own souls through
time for eternity. They both came to love the beauty of the world and to
look beyond it for consolation.
Evelyn Waugh once said that Muggeridge expressed the
"particularly English loneliness of a religiously minded man
suddenly made alive to the fact that he is outside Christendom."
Bishop Fulton J. Sheen as he lay dying had said to Malcolm Muggeridge
that he thought Muggeridge's assessment was correct. "You are
right, Sheen said, "Christendom is finished." By Christendom
he meant all of the structures Western man set to guide souls to
eternity; all of its art and its creativity seemed to be finished. Sheen
added, "And though Christendom is finished, Christ is still
valid."
Malcolm Muggeridge died in November 1990. He suffered a little at
the end. We can only pray he flew away to what he deemed "other
more commodious skies." He once wrote a book entitled A Third
Testament (1976) about prophetic writers who also searched for religious
truth--Blake, Tolstoy, Dostoyevsky, Kierkegaard. I believe
Muggeridge's books also serve as a Third Testament succoring man in
his search for God.
PATRICK J. WALSH is a regular contributor to Modern Age: A
Quarterly Review. He resides in Massachusetts.