Email counselling with young people in Australia: a research report.
Rawson, Sarah ; Maidment, Jane
Introduction
During 2009, Kids Help Line (KHL) responded to 14,076 email and web
counselling requests from young people aged between 5 and 18, with the
online media attracting a far higher proportion of young people wanting
counselling and support than telephone (93% compared with 47%) (Kids
Helpline, 2009:9). Even so, internet counselling is still in its infancy
in terms of usage in Australia. While there is a great deal of
theoretical speculation about the efficacy of online counselling, the
lack of research and evaluation into this area of service delivery has
been noted (Urbis Keys Young, 2003).
According to the Australian Bureau of statistics 72% of Australian
households now have home internet access and 78% of households have
access to a computer. Between 1998 and 2008-09, household access to the
internet at home has more than quadrupled from 16% to 72%, while access
to computers has increased from 44% to 78%. Broadband is accessed by
close to two-thirds (62%) of all households in Australia and 86% of all
households with internet access (ABSa, 2009). Of particular relevance to
this research is the level of internet access for Australian youth.
Almost 84% of Year 4 students and almost 90% in Year 8 reported having
an internet connection at home during 2007 (ABSb, 2009). These figures
clearly show the prevalence of the internet as a mode of communication
for young people in Australia and highlight the need to examine the
effectiveness of the growing online counselling services designed
specifically for this age group.
Despite burgeoning internet usage, examination of issues such as
the development of the therapeutic alliance, exploration of how empathy
is experienced and the use of online counselling as the primary means of
intervention (rather than an adjunct to traditional therapy) have yet to
be researched in any depth (Mallen, Vogel & Rochlen, 2005). To begin
the inquiry we examined two sets of literature. These included material
on the development of rapport in helping relationships, along with
examination of research and literature on internet counselling, support
and usage.
Brief Overview of Literature
Therapeutic Alliance
The therapeutic alliance has been defined as "the extent to
which a client and therapist work collaboratively and purposefully and
connect emotionally, and is conceptualised as a common, or generic
factor in that it is believed to cut across various treatment
approaches" (Gellhaus Thomas, Werner-Wilson & Murphy, 2005:
19).
The conceptualisation of this type of alliance has psychodynamic
origins, dating back to Freud's theories of transference and
counter transference, in which he maintained the need for a
'serious interest' in and 'sympathetic
understanding' of the client to permit the healthy part of the
client's self to form a positive attachment to the analyst (Freud,
1913). These ideas were later built upon by Carl Rogers who advocated
for worker non judgement, respect, empathy and unconditional positive
regard towards clients (Rogers, 1967), and were further examined by
Bordin (1979, 1994) to distinguish specific ways in which the
'alliance' could be conceptualised. For the purposes of
research a number of psychometric scales have subsequently been
developed to aid the measurement of the client/worker alliance.
Principle components of these include dimensions that focus upon
mutuality and empathy, a sense of collaboration and support and the
degree to which agreed tasks are achieved (Doucette & Bickman, 2001;
Horvath, 1994). Quantitative research has consistently identified the
quality of the therapeutic alliance as being a central influencing
factor on the outcome of interventions across a range of helping
modalities (Gellhaus Thomas, Werner-Wilson & Murphy, 2005). Research
pertaining to the notion of alliance building in email counselling has
been difficult to locate using either qualitative or quantitative
methodologies. In this context it is important to note the difference
between the asynchronistic method of communication occurring during KHL
email counselling, and real time synchronistic counselling accessible
from some agencies using 'chat' modality online. Emailing
counselling at KHL consists of 'virtual' discussions that do
not take place in real time, but are developed between the young person
and their counsellor over a period of time. There have been mixed
anecdotal responses to the idea of rapport building online using
asynchronistic communication.
Robson and Robson (1998) maintain that counselling involves an
intimate, albeit professional, relationship. As the client-counsellor
relationship develops, clients learn more about themselves, and this can
lead to a more intimate relationship with the counsellor. They argue,
with the lack of verbal communication the capacity to develop such a
relationship online will be severely limited (Robson & Robson 1998).
This point, however, has been debated. After examination of a
variety of case studies, the International Society for Mental Health
Online maintains that:
As the text relationship develops, the partners also become more
sensitive to the nuances of each other's typed expressions, and
together may develop their own private language and style of
communication. While the therapeutic relationship may in some ways be
made more complex by the absence of some sensory cues, in many ways we
are in fact learning to work with the presence of new additional (text
based) data and the power of the word. (Fenichel, Suler, Barak, Zelvin,
Jones, Munro, Meunier, Wlaker Schucker, 2002 p. 6)
The question, largely unanswered in the existing research then
becomes, how is the therapeutic alliance developed in an online
environment? This research project was designed to address this
particular question.
Lack of verbal and visual cues
Much of the debate about the effectiveness of online counselling
cites the lack of verbal and visual cues. The client's tone, speech
quality, personal hygiene, body language and appearance are all cues
absent from online counselling, while a large part of traditional
therapy depends upon assessment of these characteristics (Barak 1999,
Robson & Robson 2000, Gwinnell 2003). Nevertheless, the online
environment has adapted somewhat to accommodate this deficiency (Colon
1996), with workers at KHL observing extensive use of emoticons to
convey affect and mood, eg: :-), :-(; use of imagery in dialogue, eg: I
am looking really flat and low; and use of shorthand text for ease of
flow in dialogue and to convey emotion, eg: lol (laugh out loud). Others
however warn that emoticons may be too simplistic to interpret authentic
emotional responses with accuracy (Mallen, Vogel & Rochlen, 2005).
An additional feature of cyber communication that appears to encourage
young people's use of online counselling is the degree of anonymity
this medium affords.
Anonymity and Identity
Online services appeal to people who wish to remain anonymous.
There is also evidence to suggest that people are more likely to admit
vulnerabilities within the context of a computer text exchange
(Christensen, Griffiths, & Korten, 2002).
This finding has been supported through case studies examined by
the International Society for Mental Health Online:
Unlike the telephone, they [online interactions] provide enhanced
anonymity, opportunity for self-expression through writing, increased
ambiguity of counsellors, ease of escape, and enhanced aloneness, thus
facilitating depth of self-disclosure and exposure of personal
materials, as well as accelerating the speed of opening up. (Fenichel et
al 2002, p. 8)
However, anonymity also brings with it ethical dilemmas in relation
to verification of identity. The anonymity and unreality associated with
chat rooms and email may encourage a form of role play. Gwinnell (2003)
calls this the 'masquerade aspect' of online counselling.
Choosing a false name, persona or presentation, is similar to wearing a
mask. Self-protection, or a desire to remain anonymous while exploring
role playing, encourages people to choose other screen identities.
Additionally, the potential also exists for deliberate deception
and manipulation of the counsellor or online support group, or both.
Again, Gwinnell (2003) points out that the internet offers a powerful
and even potentially dangerous forum for acting out and victimising more
vulnerable individuals. In addition, opportunity exists for
professionals to misrepresent themselves. The client has little chance
to be able to examine true and full information about a service provider
and consequently they can be left unprotected (Barak 1999). This
situation is further compounded by the limited formal guidelines that
exist for conducting asynchronous online counselling.
However KHL does have a rigorous training program for counsellors
to complete before they begin email counselling which includes:
discussion of research findings about email counselling and ethical
dilemmas; simulation of email responses to a variety of topics; use of
specific tools for rapport building such as emoticons, language, speed
of reply, length of reply and risk assessment. This training is offered
to counsellors in a variety of learning environments through online
learning modules, group and individual supervision, formal regular
feedback from overseeing supervisors, and also a probationary period
through which each and every email to a client is checked by a
supervisor before being sent to a client. Staff are unable to work for
KHL as independent email counsellors without passing probation.
Asynchronous thoughtfulness
The asynchronous quality of email communication provides both
client and counsellor with the opportunity to devote greater
thoughtfulness to their responses. This in turn may lead to more
effective communication (Childress 1998). Evidence from KHL suggests
that online counselling 'provides an opportunity for thoughtfulness
and reflection and may encourage clarity of communication' (KHL
2000). These types of communication may impact on the depth of
disclosure that occurs during an online counselling session.
Depth of Disclosure
KHL have discovered through earlier research that web clients were
more likely to be direct about serious personal concerns than telephone
clients, particularly around issues of suicide ideation and child abuse
(KHL 2000). The safety and anonymity of online interactions appear to
lend themselves to self-disclosure, particularly for children who fear
prejudice on the basis of gender, race, ethnicity, disability and those
who fear public displays of emotion (Barak 1999, Griffiths 2001, Sussman
2002, Wilson & Lester 1998).
Even so, recent American research with 64 participants focusing on
self-disclosure in the online environment yielded contradictory data,
suggesting online communication does not in fact foster self-disclosure
to the same extent as face to face encounters in counselling (Mallen,
Day, Green, 2003). Clearly there are mixed findings about the efficacy
of facilitating self-disclosure in an online environment. The influence
of writing text as opposed to verbalising problems or issues has also
been subject to some examination.
Externalising and the text modality
It has been argued that the very process of writing an email
externalises the client's problems (Murphy & Mitchell 1998). As
they type, the client's written representations of their issues
appear before them. It is believed that this process can enhance the
externalising of problems and therefore promote therapeutic change
(Murphy & Mitchell 1998). Writing about events is a form of
journaling that enables the client to externalise their pain and issues,
creating some distance between the events and their personal identity.
The process of journaling has been used creatively as a tool in
counselling to encourage self-reflection and self-assessment (Burnett
& Meacham, 2002) where people make connections between their
existing knowledge and their new knowledge (Gilmore 1998). Journaling,
or the process of writing and recording one's life experience and
perspective, has many similarities to the process of email counselling
with the added benefit that the client gets to keep a complete record of
his/her entire set of transactions with the counsellor, as the
'file' is created online.
The KHL system for managing the email counselling system works in
the following way:
* Emails are received into a general email address and appear in an
'unallocated queue' in order of the date received.
* Shift supervisors and senior counsellors read every email to
assess urgency. Emails of high risk content are marked urgent / 24
hours.
* Counsellors respond to emails from the 'unallocated
queue' according to a) urgency and b) date order.
* After an email has been responded to by a counsellor, the
client's subsequent emails automatically go into that
counsellor's inbox. Supervisors still have access to the
counsellor's in-box. Thus the client has continuity of care with
one ongoing counsellor.
Research Method
In a qualitative inquiry, knowledge is personally constructed and
contextually bound. The medium of email counselling lends itself to
qualitative examination as KHL clients use email counselling to convey
their reality. The text medium gives clients the opportunity to
carefully construct, edit and verify their reality, in a way that is not
necessarily available in face to face or telephone counselling. Clients
have the benefit of distance and time to reflect on their reality as
they are writing, and also have the opportunity to rethink and reflect
upon their stories as they keep copies of their emails. The absence of
verbal and visual cues ensures that counsellors ask for clarification
and context from a client in an effort to understand their story, rather
than perhaps shortcutting that process in the presence of other cues,
such as voice, tone and background noise. Given these unique dimensions
associated with email counselling we decided that a qualitative approach
provided opportunities for narrative and content analysis of the
text-based data.
Design & Pre-testing
The research design comprised of an electronic survey with a series
of four closed questions relating to participant demography and internet
usage, and seven open-ended questions.
The questions were designed as a result of examining aspects of the
therapeutic alliance gathered from a number of sources. These included
Carl Rogers' person-centred counselling and aspects of the
relationship development between counsellor and client (Rogers, 1957),
the working alliance inventory designed by Horvath and Greenberg (1986),
and anecdotal evidence of aspects of therapeutic alliance gathered from
counsellors at KHL.
Pre-testing of the questionnaire structure, comprehension and
general wording occurred prior to the questionnaire appearing live
online. Pre-testing involved contacting via email, a random selection of
ten existing email clients and providing them with a draft of the survey
questions. These clients were asked for feedback about the wording,
structure and comprehension of the survey. Before use three KHL
counsellors, two youth workers and two teachers also studied the survey
and these people's specific knowledge of 'child friendly'
language helped to shape the style used. Supervisors and managers at KHL
perused the survey to check it fulfilled the necessary requirements for
KHL, including confidentiality and anonymity. The survey was then posted
on the homepage of KHL for six weeks during the months of March and
April 2005. All responses remained anonymous and were forwarded to the
researcher via email from the webpage posting box.
Data Analysis
Narrative analysis was used in this research to examine the email
responses about online counselling. These responses were subjected to
categorical-content analysis using a narrative interpretation. Breaking
this down further, in working from a categorical perspective, the
original story was dissected and sections or sometimes single words
belonging to defined categories were collected from the entire story
(rather than individual questions) and from several texts belonging to a
number of narrators (Cortazzi 1993).
This process resulted in a series of categories being created,
which were used to code the data, providing descriptive accounts (case
studies) and present an analysis of notable patterns. Table 1 provides
examples of how individual case data was categorised.
Firstly all the qualitative data and identified key words and
phrases in each response from the interviews were read using an initial
memo process noting recurring words and phrases. These were next
clustered into a series of categories with an analysis of the context in
which each of these categories were integrated. For example, referring
to Table 1, in the section 'choice of email counselling', one
response was: "it gives you more time to think". This fitted
into the category (created through identification with key word/s) of
'Reflection and asynchronous thoughtfulness'. This category
was then expanded to include the context (ie: the development of the
therapeutic alliance in email counselling): 'Email promotes
reflection on one's story'. This was a gentle, detailed form
of analysis taking into account the importance of every individual
response, and then identifying common words / phrases, and resulting in
themes relevant to email counselling.
Participants
Participants in this research included new and existing email
clients at KHL. The age range for clients at KHL is between 5 and 18.
However, given the overwhelming majority of clients who access web and
email counselling are between 12 and 18, clients of that age range were
invited to participate in this study. Participants were recruited for
the study via an invitation that was posted on the KHL website near
information about web counselling. The invitation provided a hyperlink
to the electronic survey. Counsellors also voluntarily informed their
clients and directed them to the hyperlink. Table 2 provides a breakdown
of the ages of the 63 young people who participated in the research.
This breakdown in age range of participants reflects the age
statistics typically seen in email counselling at KHL. That is young
people between the ages of 14 and 18 are the most frequent users of the
email service (KHL, 2004).
Table 3 provides a gender breakdown of the participants in the
research. Statistically, young females are more frequent service users
at KHL (KHL, 2004, 2009), so it was not surprising that young women made
up the majority of participants in the research. The participants who
completed the online surveys were therefore representative of the gender
and age range of client groups who are known to use KHL services the
most.
Ethical Considerations
One of the most challenging ethical dilemmas in this study involved
the issue of informed consent. Clients at KHL are overwhelmingly under
18 years of age and as such technically require adult or parental
consent for counselling and / or participation in research studies. KHL
maintains that, as they are a confidential, anonymous service (no
identifying information other than a first name is required, and even
then young people often use 'code names'), it was not
necessary to collect signed consent forms from the parents of the young
clients participating in the research.
Involvement in this research and all service delivery provided by
KHL to young people is of a voluntary nature at all times. However,
given the seriousness of the work done by the agency and the
accompanying issues related to duty of care, the area of not having
parental consent for young people's involvement in the service
continues to be a challenging and contentious issue.
Ethics approval for conducting this research was sought and
provided from both Kids Helpline and Central Queensland University.
Participants were encouraged to 'talk' online with their Kids
Helpline counsellor should any issues arise as a result of participating
in the research process.
A number of strategies are in place to deal with duty of care
considerations in email counselling at KHL. These responses are provided
due to increased occurrences of serious, life threatening presentations
in the online environment. These strategies include:
* Additional training and experience required for email and web
counsellors (in comparison to phone counsellors).
* Monitoring by shift supervisors of real time calls to support
counsellor and client during at risk presentations.
* 24/7 availability of the manager of counselling services for
consultation in relation to breaching confidentiality in cases of
extreme risk.
* Access to police communications who trace IP addresses if
immediate intervention is required.
* Capacity to encourage online clients to cross over to the phone
counselling service (which operates 24/7) if required. From a
technological perspective it is faster and easier for police to trace a
phone call if extreme risk is present.
Limitations of the Research
The study had a number of limitations. Firstly, it was challenging
to recruit participants using the internet. Existing email clients
rarely go back to the website after their first visit to acquire the
email address and also rarely read the automatic response received after
each email. Secondly, the traditional method of ensuring reliability and
validity, that is inviting participants to validate their own data
through a discussion of responses, was not available given the anonymous
nature of both KHL clientele and the research data collection method.
Thirdly, the actual computer page housing the survey did not provide a
large amount of room for young people to provide their answers. This may
have discouraged young people from providing more in-depth reflections.
Finally, since young service users were encouraged to respond to the
survey by their own counsellors, these personal connections with KHL
staff may have influenced survey responses.
Even though these factors have been identified as limitations, the
replies received from the 63 young people who contributed survey
responses did provide a wealth of qualitative data and highlighted
several interesting and previously unexamined aspects of the development
of the therapeutic alliance in email counselling. The most significant
of these findings are discussed below.
Results and Discussion
For the purposes of reporting the data, after each quote the gender
and age of the participant is shown. In addition, quotes from
participants have been taken directly from the data, with no editing or
correction of spelling and grammar.
Themes and patterns in relation to therapeutic alliance
It is worth noting that a number of participants found it difficult
to define aspects of the therapeutic alliance or noted that they could
not tell when the counsellor was listening, if they cared and what they
were like. This perhaps shows the complexity of the concept (therapeutic
alliance) and the difficulty in definition, when referring to the text
form. In total, 23 participants (36.5%) fell into the category of either
answering that they didn't know how the alliance is formed, or
noting that it wasn't possible to tell if a counsellor was
listening, if they cared about what they are saying, or what the
counsellor was like. However, many of these participants went on to
clarify these answers and showed that they could identify elements of
the alliance, without possibly fully understanding the concept. For
example:
"You can't really. But they sort of sound kind in the
email" ( F15).
"I don't know really. The way they talk to you about your
issues. It's not good if they ignore what you're saying and
don't talk about it in your reply" (F14).
"I don't know. Generally the smiley faces do a lot for me
in terms of feeling like they are friendly" (F18).
While the therapeutic relationship, and its definition, may in some
ways be made more complex by the absence of some sensory cues, in many
ways we are in fact learning to work with the presence of new additional
(text-based) data and the power of the word (Fenichel et al 2002). Table
4 shows a summary of the responses to the questions relating to
therapeutic alliance. The most frequently cited themes and patterns have
been identified next to the quotations provided by participants. This
method of presenting the data, as discussed by Lieblich, TuvalMashiach,
& Zilber (1998), is part of content analysis and allowed for the
conceptualisation of key categories. Key words were extracted from the
data and presented in the column on the right as themes and patterns
relating to therapeutic alliance in email counselling.
Table 4 shows a number of patterns emerging from the data. The
notion of reflection was identified by several participants. Reflection
being a key tool in narrative therapy enables clients to 'see'
their stories, which in turn can lead to a closer examination of
patterns and beliefs. In this regard the medium of email counselling has
the added benefit of being in a modality which provides a clear
externalisation (that is, the written word) of problems and issues the
client might be experiencing. It would appear from this data that
facilitating reflection was a key process in the text medium towards
building the therapeutic alliance.
The length and depth of reply also figured prominently in
participant responses, which may be related to the differing
conceptualisations of time, discussed below. Complex issues take more
time to deal with in all counselling mediums. The length and depth of an
email may be an indicator for the client of a counsellor's
interest, their willingness to engage in a meaningful way, and their
understanding of the gravity of a young person's problem or story.
It became apparent that at times and for some young people, a short
email response indicated a lack of interest and understanding, for
example as one participant notes,
"if they just give you a couple sentences, then it's like
they haven't taken any time and don't care. If its longer it
shows they are really trying to get to the heart of stuff. And they care
more" (F16).
Emoticons and informal language are phenomena particular to
text-based communication and in the data collected feature as tools for
building a therapeutic alliance. As has been identified in the brief
review of the literature, the 'short cut' of smileys and other
emoticons can give the client and counsellor a window into the feelings
and emotions shared by both, and act as a substitute for verbal and
visual cues (Colon 1996).
Humour and personalised language also featured in the data. Humour
can convey a sense of fun and can ease anxiety very quickly. It would
seem from the data that personalised language, such as using the
client's name, or signing off in an informal way like "see you
later", conveyed to the client that the counsellor is willing to
'meet' on more personal terms which appeared to encourage more
personal disclosure and sense of trust.
The traditional counselling skills such as showing empathy,
validating, summarising, paraphrasing, using respectful language
(Geldard & Geldard 1999), were all mentioned by participants in the
research as factors that contributed to building the therapeutic
alliance. This shows that many of the elements of the alliance developed
in more traditional counselling media were in turn transferred to this
online counselling situation. The data clearly suggested it was possible
to show empathy, for example, without tone of voice and facial
expressions.
Time
The issue of time presented itself in the research data in two key
areas. Firstly almost half (46%), of the participants believe the
service would better meet their needs if the email responses from
counsellors were quicker. These results also reflect anecdotal evidence
at KHL, where clients often comment to counsellors that they wish the
service was faster. Secondly, a number of participants made comments
about time in questions relating to therapeutic alliance, that is, how
you could tell the counsellor is listening to you, how you could tell
what the counsellor is like and how you could tell that the counsellor
cares about what you are saying. Diagram 1 shows a number of responses
to the above questions. The diagram is circular in nature, each section
relating back to, and feeding into, the core interpretation of time in
this context.
It became clear from responses that the length of time it took for
a client to feel comfortable with a counsellor varied dramatically
between participants and was often subject to a number of contextual
factors. It was not clear, however, whether or not it took longer to
build the therapeutic alliance in email counselling, which was an
assumption of this research, given the passage of time spent in
receiving, reading and writing responses to client emails. It may be
that the added dimensions of time passing within the emailing process,
along with factors of faith in the service which were evident in client
comments, and the process of validation through writing and having
emails read, enabled the therapeutic alliance to develop quickly. The
elongated process of writing back and forth may therefore in and of
itself compensate somewhat for the lack of verbal and visual cues.
The process of the counsellor simply replying appeared to have a
powerful effect for young people in terms of contributing to a strong
therapeutic alliance. A number of participants stated that the
counsellor replying automatically showed them they care and wanted to
help. For clients, the process of expressing their feelings and
problems, and being heard (which is implied in a response), is a
powerful dimension of the helping relationship. This dimension of
alliance-building simply through the process of text exchange appears to
be absent from the literature about online counselling, but came through
strongly in the data analysis.
In conclusion
In relation to KHL current online service delivery, this research
suggests that email counselling meets a clear and present need for young
people who, for a range of reasons are unable or unwilling to access
other more traditional modes of therapy.
[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]
Many of the issues identified within existing literature in
relation to email counselling have been present in the data collected
for this research. Points relating to privacy, access, level of
disclosure, safety in distance, anonymity, opportunities for reflection
and asynchronous thoughtfulness all featured prominently in the
perspectives of young people who participated in the research. The
skills of summarising, paraphrasing, using respectful language, showing
empathy, using humour and being consistent were also identified by the
young people as being used by counsellors in the online environment, and
appreciated by the clients. The added tools of emoticons and 'short
hand' sentences in the email exchanges helped to convey meaning and
contributed to the therapeutic alliance.
In relation to this alliance, the concept of time featured
prominently in a number of ways and brings a new and unique dimension to
consider in this area of research. Examining the notion of
'time' must include the contradictory aspects of young people
wanting faster replies, but appreciating the extra time the counsellor
takes to reply in depth. In addition, the concept of time passing was
identified as being part of the appeal of email counselling and a
contributing factor in the development of the therapeutic alliance, with
the passage of time needed also for rapport building and personal change
to occur.
References
Australian Bureau of Statistics (2009a) 8146.0--Household Use of
Information Technology, Australia.
http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/8146.0
Accessed 29th Nov. 2010
Australian Bureau of Statistics (2009b) 4102.0 Australian Social
trends, June 2009. Student achievement in maths and science.
http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/Lookup/4102.0Main+
Features30June+2009 Accessed 29th Nov. 2010
Barak A. (1999) 'Psychological applications on the Internet: A
discipline on the threshold of a new millennium', Applied and
Preventive Psychology 8, 231-246
Bordin E. (1979) The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept
of the working alliance. Psychotherapy Theory, Research and Practice. 16
pp252-260
Bordin E. (1994) Theory and research on the therapeutic working
alliance: New directions in A.Horvath & L. Greenberg. (eds), The
Working Alliance: Theory, Research and Practice (pp13-37) John Wiley
& Sons. New York
Burnett, P. & Meacham, D. (2002) Learning Journals as a
Counselling Strategy. Journal of Counselling & Development 80.
pp410-415
Childress C. (1998) 'Potential Risks and Benefits of Online
Psychotherapeutic Interventions', International Society for Mental
Health Online, viewed 30th August 2004, <www.ismho.org/issues>
Christensen, H, Griffiths, KM & Evans, K. (2002) e-Mental
Health in Australia: Implications of the Internet and related
Technologies for Policy 2002--Information Strategy Committee Discussion
Paper No. 3. Commonwealth Department of Health and Ageing, Canberra
Christensen, H, Griffiths, K and Groves, C. (2003) 'Online
Mental Health Information', in WootonR, Yellowless P and McLaren P
(eds), Telepsychiatry and E-Mental Health, Royal Society of medicaine
Press Ltd, London
Christensen, H, Griffiths, K and Korten, A. (2002) 'Web based
Cognitive Behaviour Therapy:
Analysis of Site Usage and Changes in Depression and Anxiety
Scores', Journal of Medical
Internet Research 2002, vol. 4 (1): e3, viewed 19th August 2004,
http://www.jmir.org/2002/1/e3/index.htm
Colon Y. (1996) 'Chattering through the fingertips: doing
group therapy online', Women and Performance: a Journal of Feminist
Theory 9 pg 205-215
Cortazzi, M. (1993) Narrative Analysis, The Falmer Press, London
Doucette, A. & Bickman, L. (2001) Building a comprehensive,
integrated and practical child and adolescent mental health services
measurement system. Paper presented at: 14th Annual Conference, A
Systsem of Care for Childrens Mental Health: Expanding the Research
Base. Feb 25-28. Tampa, Florida
Fenichel, M, Suler, J, Barak, A, Zelvin, E, Jones, G, Munro, K,
Meunier V, Wlaker-schucker, W. (2002) 'Myths and Realities of
Online Clinical Work: Observations on the phenomena of online behaviour,
experience and therapeutic relationships. A 3rd Year Report from
ISMHO's Clinical Case
Freud S. (1913) 'On the beginning of treatment: Further
recommendations on the technique of psychoanalysis', in Strachey
(Ed. And Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological
works of Sigmund Freud, Hogarth Press, London
Geldard, K, and Geldard, D. (1999) Counselling Adolescents, Sage
Publications, London
Gellhaus, S., Werner-Wilson, R & Murphy, M. (2005) Influence of
the Therapist and Client Behaviors on Therapy Alliance. Contemporary
Family Therapy 27(1) pp19-35
Gilmore F. (1998) Qualitative research: written journals within
teacher training, HERDSA Annual International Conference, University of
Auckland
Griffiths, M. (2001) Online Therapy: A cause for concern? The
Psychologist 14 (5) pg 244-248
Gwinnell E. (2003) Unique Aspects of Internet Relationships in
Wootton P, Yellowlees P & McLaren P (eds) Telepsychiatry and
e-Mental Health, LibraPharm, United Kingdom
Horvath A. (1994) Empirical validation of Bordin's pan
theoretical model of the alliance: The working alliance Inventory
perspective in A.Horvath & L. Greenberg. (eds), The Working
Alliance: Theory, Research and Practice (pp13-37) John Wiley & Sons.
New York
Horvath, A. & Greenberg, L. (1986) Development of the working
alliance inventory, in Greenberg, L S, and Pinsof, W M, (eds), The
Psychotherapeutic Process: A Research Handbook, The Guilford Press, New
York, pp 529-556
Kids Help Line (2000) A Wealth of Wisdom from the Web, Kids Help
Line Newsletter October 2000, viewed 1st September 2004, <
www.kidshelp.com.au >
Kids Help Line (2003) Online Counselling 2003 , Kids Help Line
Infosheet, viewed 1st September 2004, <www.kidshelp.com.au
Kids Help Line, (2004) Kids Help Online 2004, Kids Help Line
Infosheet, viewed 1.9.2004, www.kidshelp.com.au
Kids Help Line 2009 Overview.
http://www.kidshelp.com.au/upload/22862.pdf Accessed 17th December 2010
Lieblich, A, and Tuval_Mashiach, R, and Zilber T. (1998) Narrative
Research: Reading, Analysis, and Interpretation, Sage Publications,
California,
Mallen, M. Day, S, Green, M. (2003) Online versus Face to Face
Conversations: an Examination of Relational and Discourse Variables,
Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, vol. 40, no. 1 / 2,
pp 155-163
Mallen, M., Vogel, D. & Rochlen, A. (2005) The practical
aspects of online counseling: Ethics, training, technology, and
competency. The Counseling Psychologist. 33(6) 776-818
Murphy, L. & Mitchell, D. (1998) When writing helps to heal:
email as therapy, British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, vol 26,
no. 1 21-32
Robson, D. & Robson, M (1998) Intimacy and Computer
Communication, British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, vol 26, no.
1 33-41
Rogers C. (1957) The necessary and sufficient conditions of
therapeutic personality change, Journal of Consulting Psychology, 21,
95-106
Rogers C. (1967) On Becoming a Person: A therapist's view of
psychotherapy, Constable, London
Sussman R (2002) Counselling over the Internet: Benefits and
Challenges, viewed 8th August 2004, <
http://www.cybercounsel.uncg.edu >
Urbis, Keys, Young. (2003) National Review of Tele Counselling and
Web Counselling Services: Final Report, Australian Government Department
of Health and Ageing, Canberra
Wilson, G and Lester, D (1998) Suicide Prevention by E-mail, Crisis
Intervention 4 pg 81-87
Authors: Sarah Rawson, Counsellor, Kids Helpline. Email:
sjrawson@bigpond.com Jane Maidment, Christchurch Polytechnic Institute
of Technology.
Table 1: Two Examples of Categorical Data Analysis
Categories Comments /Memos
Female 18: elements of therapeutic alliance
"as they don't judge Non judgmental Participant is
you you start to open guarded at first
up"
"if they answer with Respect Need for respect
respect and insight" common to all
interactions
"if they write back Reply The alliance is
that's a start" already being built
based on one reply
"I just figure they Trust (faith, hope) Trust in counsellor
must be a good person" as expert' and
good'
"the detail they have Depth of reply Time = level of care
written in emails
tells you they care
and are listening"
Female 18: choice of email counselling
"don't feel Stigma Mental health stigma
comfortable talking to
a stranger on the
phone. They might
think I'm crazy"
"I feel more distance Safety in distance Email less
when emailing" confronting
"it gives you more Reflection and Email promotes
time to think" asynchronous reflection on one's
thoughtfulness story
"I can use it as a Journaling, Reflection Email promotes
diary" and asynchronous reflection on one's
thoughtfulness story
Table 2: Age of Participants
Age Number of participants
Under 12 4 (6.4%)
12 3 (4.7%)
13 9 (14.3%)
14 5 (7.9%)
15 14 (22.3%)
16 11 (17.5%)
17 10 (15.9%)
18 6 (9.5%)
Over 18 1 (1.5%)
Total Participants 63
Table 3: Gender of Participants
Gender Number of participants
Male 4 (6.4%)
Female 59 (93.7%)
Total Participants 63
Table 4: Aspects of Therapeutic Alliance in Email Counselling
Key words,
themes,
Survey Participant responses phrases
Questions relating to
therapeutic
alliance
How can you "If they mention all the issues you Encouragement,
tell the raised in your email, and encouraged validation,
counsellor you to say more about them or ask reflection
is listening some questions. And if they
to you? acknowledge your emotions, and can
tell how you are feeling" F18 (Female
18 years of age)
"by the tone of what they say and how Tone,
they say it. by referring back to summarising
thinghs i have said in previous
emails" F13
"I can tell they are listening Interest,
because of the depth of their emails depth of
and how it goes into what i wrote, understanding
and how they seem "interested" by
asking questions related to what i
wrote." F15
"So like if u say something and then Paraphrasing,
in their response they kinda rephrase
it and ask questions about it" F17
"When the counsellor talks about what Reflection
you have said you know they've read
your email and thought about it" F17
"They repeat everything I say and Reflection,
then add to it to make me reflect on paraphrasing
what I have said to them." F15
How can you "By the way they write, how long the Length and
tell what letter is, if they crack jokes, and depth of reply
the how they word what they write" F15
counsellor
is like? "can tell the counsellor is Respectful
understanding because she speaks language,
politely, clearly and mentions my familiarity
name in reply emails which adds a
more personal feel to the email" F16
"You can't fully, but generally the Emoticons,
smiley faces do a lot for me in terms reflection,
of feeling like they are being informal
friendly. If they throw in a nice language
comment or remember something you
said in an earlier email it makes you
feel they are nice. Informal language
and maybe some little phrases helps
as well." F18
"if they are funny sometimes, or use Humour,
nice words that make you feel good. respectful
like that they understand or it's ok language
to feel stuff. if they are gentle and
use gentle language like 'what would
it be like' instead of 'do this'
thats cool" M16
"humour, smileys, gender, someone who Humour,
uses respectful language and takes gender,
time to pick out the main stuff we emoticons,
write. if they make an effort to use respectful
language we understand, that tells us language,
they are trying and if they don't paraphrasing,
push too hard, that tells us they are patience,
patient. when i read back their consistency
emails i can get a sense of who they
are by the language they use. if they
are consistent i know they are being
themselves and being honest." F18
"you cant for awhiel so you gueard Non-judgmental
yourself incase it turns out they are
judgemental, then as they dont judge
you you start to open up." F18
"It sounds silly but like by putting Emoticons
smiley faces and stuff its kinda like
thats them smiling and being nice"
F17
"lol, how they type, like in short Informal
engligh, how they put words etc" M15 language
"you can tell what the counsellor is Empathy
like from the way they sympathise
with you and talk to you, and greet
you." F17
"My counsellor is gentle and patient Gentleness,
and sometimes tells jokes or tells me patience
sayings." F17
How can "they keep in touch with you" F15 Commitment
you tell the
counsellor "sometimes you know they care if they Listening
cares about listen alot and make you smile and
what you are understand you" F12
saying?
"If they say they care, and think of Honesty
ways to help you that fit the
description of what you are going
through" F15
"because they put themselves in your Empathy
shoes" F13
"If the email is brief and seems Depth of reply
abrupt it makes you feel they don't
care very much. You can tell they
care if they say they care, or if
they take the time to write a fairly
good reply, and encourage you to keep
contacting." F18
"they write back and you can tell Consistency
they have read your stuff. they tell
us they care about what we are saying
and if they keep doing that we might
believe them" M16
it's good when the counsellor tells Validation,
us that we have a right to feel the honesty
way we do and that they would like to
help. that tells us they care. If
they get back to us soon it shows
they don;y want us to be alone and
that also shows us they care." F18
"Because they will respond with Respect
respect and the best answer they
have." F17
"use of langiage again ... just Reflection
mentioning things i've said, asking
questions." F16
"I think that sympathy is a great way Empathy,
for kids to know that the counsellor validation
cares about them. When the counsellor
acknowledges the problem the kid has
and says e.g. how bad that must be,
you know that they really care about
your situation" F17