首页    期刊浏览 2024年10月06日 星期日
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Biala Gora: the forgotten colony in the medieval Pomeranian-Prussian borderlands.
  • 作者:Pluskowski, Aleksander ; Sawicki, Zbigniew ; Shillito, Lisa-Marie
  • 期刊名称:Antiquity
  • 印刷版ISSN:0003-598X
  • 出版年度:2014
  • 期号:September
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:Cambridge University Press
  • 关键词:Archaeology;Pottery;Villages

Biala Gora: the forgotten colony in the medieval Pomeranian-Prussian borderlands.


Pluskowski, Aleksander ; Sawicki, Zbigniew ; Shillito, Lisa-Marie 等


[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]

Introduction

The lower Vistula region lies at the heart of northern Poland, where the delta of this major European river punctuates a landscape of fens and floodplains (Figure 1). The earliest written sources describe this as the borderland between eastern Pomerania, also known as Pomerelia and inhabited by Slavic groups, and the adjacent territories of Pomesania and Pogesania, inhabited by Prussians. By the end of the tenth century AD, the expanding Polish Christian state was securing its control over this region with strongholds, accompanied by the development of religious infrastructure (Buko 2008: 196-99). The borderland became increasingly dangerous for colonists as tensions between Christian Pomeranians and pagan Prussians escalated. By the thirteenth century, almost all of the Pomeranian settlements east of the River Nogat had been abandoned (Jagodzihski 2004). Local conflicts were replaced by a papally sanctioned holy war against the Prussians led by the Teutonic Order, which had reached the lower Vistula by 1233. It took five decades to conquer Prussian tribal lands and re-organise the annexed territories into the Ordensstaat-a theocratic state governed by the Teutonic Order and its episcopal allies. In 1309, the fenland frontier became the heartland of the new polity, with the castle of Marienburg (today Malbork) at its centre (Rozenkranz 1965), accompanied by a second wave of predominantly German-speaking colonists sustaining the foundation of new settlements for over a century.

The two phases of colonisation--Pomeranian and German--are often treated separately, and the conquest of Prussian tribal lands is associated with an archaeological hiatus between the pre-Christian Baltic culture and the medieval Christian theocracy (Pluskowski 2012). Many of the later medieval colonies in the Ordensstaat are visible today as towns, villages and ruined castles within modern north-eastern Poland, the Russian Kaliningrad Oblast and south-western Lithuania. However, a site occupied during the transitional period has been identified to the north of the village of Biala Gora (formerly Weissenburg), c. 18km south-west of Malbork (Sztum County, Pomeranian voivodeship). It represents a unique example of an excavated medieval rural colony in the Vistula borderlands which sustained itself into the fourteenth century. Biala Gora 3, first discovered during a field survey in 1972, has been the subject of excavations in 2007 and 2008 by the Department of Archaeology at the Castle Museum in Malbork and in 2011 within the framework of the 'Ecology of Crusading' research project (Pluskowski et al. 2011) (Figure 2a). The results from the excavations illustrate the roles played by this unique site, situating it within the processes that fundamentally transformed the cultures and landscapes of the southern Baltic in the thirteenth century.

Site location and extent of the cultural horizon

Biala Gora 3 is located at the edge of an escarpment overlooking the Nogat floodplain. It is bordered to the north by a natural slope which drops steeply down to the floodplain; to the west by the Forest of Sztum (formerly Stuhmische Heide), which extends over 20km between Malbork and Kwidzyn (formerly Marienwerder); and to the south by a small pine grove.

Excavations and surveys in 2007, 2008 and 2011 (Figure 2b) revealed that its western edge extended to the former banks of the Nogat. The extent of the site--around four hectares--was delineated by coring, field walking and a gradiometer survey. The survey revealed discrete areas with high magnetic responses which, following excavation, reflected concentrations of buried metal and brick, and traces of potential structures (Figure 2c). One set of discrete signals, aligned in an oblique line at the base of the slope, was investigated, revealing traces of a likely river wharf. The associated stratigraphy suggested that the intensified use of the river bank coincided with an alteration in the hydrological regime of the floodplain.

This 'cultural layer' at Biala Gora 3 was an organic-rich, dark grey sand deposit immediately below the current topsoil, containing significant quantities of artefacts and ecofacts. It varied significantly in depth between 200 and 500mm, merging into various features, mostly pits, cut into the natural sand beneath. It was thicker in the south-western part of the site and disappeared towards the east and south, with a corresponding decrease in artefact and ecofact density (Figure 3). This layer appeared similar to sediments described as 'dark earth' in many early urban settlements. This term used to be associated with ideas of urban decline and abandonment, but is now recognised as relating to a wide range of activities from cultivation to the disposal of refuse (MacPhail et al. 2003; MacPhail & Crowther 2009). These studies have identified that 'dark earth' is formed from highly variable biological and pedological processes acting on a mixture of derelict buildings and associated debris, with deposits from the most recent land use.

[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]

[FIGURE 3 OMITTED]

Micro-stratigraphic analysis of the cultural layer

Thin section micromorphology was conducted to assess the nature of the cultural layer and to help understand the formation processes of this deposit. Samples were collected by directly cutting blocks from the section face from well preserved profiles and pit features across the site; a total of four blocks were taken (further information is provided in the online supplementary material). The higher frequency of amorphous black organic remains and micro-charcoal fragments in the fine material give this deposit a darker colour than the underlying sand. The fine material between the sand grains is variable, with clustering of some material types, which may relate to degradation and decay of different materials in situ (Figure 4). The presence of charcoal and bone fragments in association with anthropogenic material is a clear indicator of human activity, and the mix of 'midden-like' inclusions

would support the interpretation of a shallow spread of middening. These observations fit with McPhail's model of reworked 'urban' stratigraphy under waste grassland vegetation (MacPhail & Crowther 2009), and suggest that the site was intensively occupied for a short period of time. This characterisation is reinforced by the diversity and abundance of recovered material culture, and its associated chronology.

[FIGURE 4 OMITTED]

Chronology

Dating of the site was crucial to situating it within the extended process of colonisation in the lower Vistula valley. A number of methods were used; seeds from features were sent for AMS dating, coins and boat sintels provided relatively specific date ranges and other forms of material culture were situated in a broader, relative chronology. Phases of occupation at the site were dated by AMS and by artefact typology, including coins. The earliest date range is cal AD 1171-1268 (seed from feature 99, GU29835); Table 1) and the latest is cal AD 1307-1421. A silver bracteate minted by the Teutonic Order, found at the base of a rubbish pit (feature 102), was dated to the first quarter of the fourteenth century, with layer 120b dated to cal AD 1235-1305 (GU29833). The other two layers in the pit provided much lower probabilities, and both encompassed a total range of cal AD 1281-1395. Four other silver bracteates minted by the Teutonic Order could be dated to the first quarter of the fourteenth century (Paszkiewicz 2009); the extensive ceramic assemblage could be broadly dated to the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries, whilst several categories of artefacts such as the majority of boat sintels, buckles, spurs and keys were dateable to no later than the mid fourteenth century. This range of dates can be used to propose a multi-phase chronology: an initial phase dating to the late twelfth/first half of the thirteenth century associated with the pre-Crusade Pomeranian settlement, and a subsequent phase dating to the second half of the thirteenth century. This latter phase is characterised by Pomeranian and Teutonic Order material culture appearing in the same contexts and is the most intensive phase of activity at the site. The final phase can be dated from the fourteenth through to the early fifteenth centuries, and sees a reduction in activity.

Buildings and deposits

The site appears to have been an open settlement consisting of timber and potentially brick buildings; the closest parallels are likely to be those found in Gdansk, where the introduction of houses with an oak superstructure has been linked to the presence of a German merchant community from the mid twelfth century (Paner 2001). A field survey and coring transects revealed no evidence for embankments or ditches which characterise the defensive features of contemporary settlements. 105 features were documented at the site, with semi-circular, u-shaped and irregular profiles. The majority consisted of pits of varying depths, and a number were interpreted as postholes which, along with fragments of pugging, indicated the presence of timber buildings. Three caches of bricks and roof tiles (one also including partially burnt stones), and scattered brick fragments were recovered (Figure 5). In comparison to the dimensions of bricks from various phases at Malbork Castle, the Biala Gora bricks (measuring 299 x 146 x83mm) can be typologically dated to the later decades of the thirteenth century (Brykowska 2002). The building materials were deliberately stacked in discrete piles, perhaps for transportation to another site, and were ultimately left behind. One remnant of a probable wall foundation trench running northeast to south-west, containing fragments of brick, was uncovered in the north-western corner of the site. Other elements linked to buildings included bronze door-handle plates and lock and frame fittings, as well as iron nails, hinges, clamps for joining timbers, construction clamps and rods. With the exception of a hearth, no other domestic spaces were clearly identifiable in plan.

The material culture of ethnicity and colonisation

The majority of features contained refuse, typically a mixture of animal bone, ceramics and metal artefacts, with the deepest pit cutting 1.5m into the natural sand. Two pits (features 25 and 82) contained the largest deposits of animal bone, although there was no evident patterning in waste disposal practices. By far the largest category of artefacts was ceramics. Over 10 000 sherds were recovered from the cultural layer and pits, largely small fragments partially broken up by ploughing. Analysis is currently on-going, but it is possible to sub-divide the ceramics into two categories: the so-called 'traditional' type and 'Greyware' dateable to the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries. Both were wheel-thrown, but the traditional fragments are characterised by firing in oxidising or uncontrolled conditions, with a coarse-grained sand, gravel and grog temper. The range of vessel forms is limited and consists of standardised pots. The Greyware, on the other hand, was fired in a reducing atmosphere within a kiln and is characterised by a homogenous compact fabric, tempered with fine-grained sand. The range of Greyware vessel forms is much more diverse, with different types of pot, handled pitchers and lids. The presence of both traditional and Greyware ceramics in the same contexts within the same pits strongly suggests a period when both types were produced at the same time, with two different technologies present at the site.

[FIGURE 5 OMITTED]

Morphologically, the traditional ceramics are comparable to pottery found locally in eastern Pomerania from the twelfth to early thirteenth centuries, although they differ from the assemblage at the nearby stronghold of Wegry. Greyware, on the other hand, is associated with the heterogeneous groups who arrived during the Crusading period in Prussia. From 1230, the activities of the Teutonic Order in the lower Vistula region resulted in the protracted arrival of different groups of colonists: knights of the Order and their retinues, participants in the Crusades against the Prussian tribes which lasted until 1283, and non-combatant colonists, including merchants, artisans, sailors, carpenters, smiths and various other skilled groups. These soldiers and colonists originated from different regions in the eastern provinces of the Holy Roman Empire, and predominantly spoke German (Tandecki 2009: 440-44). Wheel-thrown, kiln-fired, hard Greyware (Harte Grauware) appears in the vicinity of Lubeck around 1200, and differs from contemporary Slavic pottery. It is subsequently found on various sites across the Baltic with documented German colonisation, shadowing Crusading events and the development of the Hanse. There has been extensive discussion of the problematic link between material culture, ethnicity and migration, especially in the early medieval period (summarised in Curta 2011). In the case of Greyware, interpretations have changed in recent years. The link between ceramic traditions and ethnicity in the German province of Brandenburg, which saw a gradual Germanisation of the Slavic population from the twelfth to fourteenth centuries, has been challenged; the adoption of Greyware on Slavic sites is no longer seen as necessarily reflecting the presence of German colonists (Jeute 2007). At the extreme periphery of German colonisation, in Novgorod, the introduction of Greyware and the abandonment of earlier forms of ceramics have been linked to the interaction of both German and Russian potters, but with the former responsible for initially introducing the technology (Brorsson 2012: 433-34). This issue concerns the relationship between technological choice and social identity, and is relevant to all categories of material culture during the Crusading/colonisation period. To what extent can the widespread presence of a new technology be correlated with the presence of a new social group?

In the case of the medieval Vistula fenlands, the distinction between Pomeranian and German groups is clearly made in the documentary record of town charters, place names, personal names and various forms of correspondence (Biskup 1991), and is consistently paralleled in certain categories of material culture, including architecture (Pluskowski 2012). In Elblqg (Elbing), just over 40km north-east of Biala Gora, there is no evidence of material culture associated with Prussians or Pomeranians in the newly founded thirteenth-century town, where the abundance of excavated Greyware vessels can be readily linked to the presence of colonists from specific German-speaking regions (Marcinkowski 2003). Whilst the Elblqg assemblage is the best known example from the Teutonic Order's urban colonies, Greyware is regularly associated with sites founded by the Order and its allies in Prussia, to the extent that it marks a noticeable archaeological hiatus between the indigenous pre-Christian Baltic culture and that of the medieval Ordensstaat. On the other hand, because of this ethnic association, the surviving indigenous Prussians, who may well have adopted the trappings of the incomers, are in danger of becoming archaeologically invisible in the post-Crusade period. In Elblag, for example, documentary sources suggest Prussians made up 3 per cent of the old town's population and were also present in the new town (Czaja 2009: 447). Biala Gora is an unusual example of a rural site with an assemblage of diverse material culture that is otherwise associated with contemporary urban communities such as Gdansk and Kolobrzeg. In both of these cases, the introduction of Greyware has been linked to the documented presence of German colonists, whether they are directly involved in production or indirectly disseminating its use (Kruppe 1981: 102-103; Rybkowski 1995) . While it is difficult to reconstruct the ethnic composition of the settlement at Biala Gora, the presence of Greyware, alongside traditional forms of vessels, can be synchronised with the well-documented process of colonisation in this region, which intensifies from the last two decades of the thirteenth century (Dlugokycki 2009).

[FIGURE 6 OMITTED]

The material culture of industry and trade

The settlement at Biala Gora appears to have had special economic functions, focusing on manufacturing and trade. A significant quantity of metal artefacts has been recovered during the three seasons of excavation. These alone point to the social and economic complexity of the community occupying the site in the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries and its access to varying natural resources, as well as the importance of the river. Among the most commonly encountered utilitarian artefacts in medieval settlements are iron knives, and at Biaia Gora there are examples of small, medium and large blades, as well as riveted, scale-tanged handles (Figure 6). The largest blade measures 250mm and is incomplete; complete blades range from l?5mm to 195mm in length. Complete and partial wooden and antler handles were attached to tangs with three to four iron rivets (Figure 6 right) and, in one example, bronze rivets. These multi-purpose blades, which are paralleled by the diversity of cut-marks on animal bone (see below), would have been used for a range of functions (Cowgill et al. 2000). Finds of scale-tanged handled blades elsewhere in the eastern Baltic have been interpreted as German imports, attributed to the integration of these societies into the Hanseatic trading network (Mugurevics 2008: 100-101).A number of hone-stones were also recovered. Evidence for small-scale industrial activities is represented by iron scissors and drills, clay spindle whorls, pieces of lead and raw amber. Evidence for bone-working is limited, although an antler die, bone awls and a comb, as well as antler tools, were probably sourced from the regular supply of dead stock, and furriers were also present at the site (see below) (Figure 7).

Commerce clearly played an important role and the significance of the river in this respect is underlined by the presence of boats at the site. Alongside boat rivets, a number of iron sintels, used to fasten together hemp (or animal hair) caulking, were recovered and could be securely dated on typological grounds (Figure 8). The majority belonged to the last quarter of the thirteenth to the late fourteenth century (Vliermans group 'D'), whilst a few could be dated to the first half of the thirteenth and to the fifteenth centuries (Vlierman 1996). The lower Vistula was essential for moving and supporting military resources during the Crusading period in Prussia, and equally important for commerce, particularly in the later thirteenth and fourteenth centuries (Czaja 2006). The presence of merchants at the site, or at least individuals handling traded commodities, is hinted at by an iron seal decorated with a stylised ship (or anchor) design. Its perforated end suggests it would have hung from a cord. A number of keys for use on mounted locks and padlocks, as well as examples of the latter, are indicative of a level of security for valued commodities. On the other hand, imported artefacts have not been found, and it seems the site was oriented more towards export.

[FIGURE 7 OMITTED]

A military presence, which can be expected at such a frontier colony, is clearly attested by several tanged crossbow bolts, socketed and tanged arrowheads, three spearheads, caltrops and a small fragment of armour (Figure 9). Equestrian equipment is represented by bridle fittings, horseshoes and spurs, and the presence of war-horses is further suggested by the character of the faunal assemblage (Figure 10). The high number of recovered horse bones may be partially related to the military and equestrian elite presence at the site, although horses would also have been used as draught and pack animals. It is clear that whole horse carcasses were processed here, and several sizes of animal were observed. The largest were represented by hoof bones, which corresponded to those recovered from medieval contexts in the outer bailey of the castle at Malbork (Maltby et al. 2009); at the opposite end of the scale were pony-sized animals. Local horses were comparatively small, and the Teutonic Order is known to have introduced significantly larger animals during the Crusading period (Ekdahl 1998). The presence of knights at the site is also suggested by a miniature bronze heraldic shield interpreted as a dress accessory, and other higher status commodities include fragments of bronze vessels, amber and glass beads, a bronze ring with an amber setting, and a diverse range of buckles, strap ends and other belt fittings (Figure 11).

The artefacts recovered to date from Biala Gora point to a composite community, with the presence of small-scale industry, commerce and military personnel. The caches of bricks and roof tiles can be linked to significant investment in durable buildings, associated in this region with the Cistercians and the Teutonic Order (Brykowska 2002). Our understanding of how this community sustained itself in the turbulent frontier region of the lower Vistula can be significantly refined by examining how it was provisioned.

Provisioning the colony

The dietary staples at Biala Gora would have been derived from cultivated plants. The range of cereals--particularly rye and barley--and weeds indicates access to permanent rotational field systems or perhaps to imported grain, although the intensity of crop production is difficult to gauge. Finds of sickles and quernstones certainly point to local harvesting and cereal processing on site. The palynological profile from nearby Parpary suggests continuity in cereal cultivation within the vicinity in the early and later medieval periods (Brown pers. comm.); the events of the Crusading period do not represent a significant hiatus in local agriculture. The fruits and nuts present at the site could also have been sourced from the fringes of the nearby woodland.

The fields utilised by the community at Biala Gora were most probably ploughed by cattle, which feature as the second most important species bred and slaughtered at the site, with many individuals slaughtered at three--five years, most likely after they were replaced in the plough teams (Makowiecki 2009: 435). The assemblage of 2841 bone fragments recovered in 2008 is typical of a medieval settlement insofar as it is dominated by domestic mammals, which represent 92 per cent of identifiable bone fragments (Table 2). Within this category, the most represented species is pig, closely followed by cattle and a significantly smaller number of sheep and goat bones, as well as horse, dog, cat and poultry. The high proportion of pig remains is a trend associated with both Pomeranian and Prussian sites in the region (Makowiecki 2009: 430), and one that can be linked to the nearby wooded landscape. Most anatomical elements were present, indicating that whole carcasses were processed at the site, with a prevalence of older individuals kept for the purposes of breeding. Few individuals were slaughtered before 12 months, with only a single neonatal pig bone identified. Although pork and beef represented the main forms of meat at the colony, beaver evidently formed part of the diet at the site, as indicated by a clear large-blade chop mark across the shaft of a femur (Figure 12C), and medieval Christian communities in the eastern Baltic certainly considered beaver meat as a viable Lenten food (Mand 2004).

[FIGURE 8 OMITTED]

[FIGURE 9 OMITTED]

[FIGURE 10 OMITTED]

The butchery data suggests a degree of standardisation, although at present there is no evidence for professional butchers at the colony. The range of cut-marks indicate that a diverse suite of good-quality tools was present; in particular, thin, sharp-bladed knives (Figure 12A, B & D). These have been employed on the full range of species and suggest the availability of quality metal-working at the site, rather than specific tools developed and used for butchering per se. Long-bladed knives are already known on Pomeranian borderland sites from the twelfth century (e.g. Wegry; Trupinda 2004: 120, cat. 260), but the introduction of specialist butchery equipment, as well as riveted blades, is typically associated with towns and castles in the Teutonic Orders state, where both cut-marks and extant tools indicate the introduction of heavy cleavers (Seetah et al. in press). The character of butchery at Biaia Gora suggests that colonists were bringing and forging good-quality metal blades, but meat processing was conducted on a small scale with multi-purpose knives. The standardisation of certain portions may reflect shared commercial values attached to meat, or even culinary preferences.

There is also diverse evidence for fur-working, which included harvesting pelts from otter, polecat and pine marten. At the lower end of the commercial fur hierarchy, a mandible from one of at least three individual cats included evidence of fine cut-marks reflecting skinning for fur removal, a widely observed activity in medieval Northern European proto-urban and urban centres. Cats occur less frequently in northern Poland before the thirteenth century, when the intensification of human settlement and accompanying ecological changes are associated with rising numbers of these commensals (Makowiecki 2009: 435). Alongside the evidence for skinning, the remains of red deer (including a sawn antler tine), wild boar, bear, fox and possibly wolf, also point to the exploitation of the nearby woodland. The presence of both hare and roe deer can be linked to more open landscapes, whilst bones from rat, shrew, vole, water vole and frog reflect a variety of specialised habitats. Rooks are also attested in the assemblage, and would have been drawn to nearby meadows and pasture (Kasprzykowski 2003: 29). The exploitation of wild mammals in the economic hinterland' of the site points to opportunistic exploitation rather than sustained harvesting. This corresponds with the frontier location of the colony prior to and during the Crusading period, and the presence of merchants at the site suggests this was one of many outposts in the commercial network shadowing the Crusades. With the establishment of the Teutonic Orders state, the exploitation of the woodland would be managed by specialised manors or Vorwerks (Polish folwarks) situated around the Forest of Sztum, subservient to the convent at Marienburg (Chec 2003, 2009).

[FIGURE 11 OMITTED]

The assemblage of fish bones, numbering 989 fragments (Table 3), as well as a significant quantity of fish scales, finds of fish hooks of varying sizes and fishing weights, indicates that diverse fishing was practised at the site, during a period of intensification in fishing associated with the emergence of the Teutonic Orders state. Freshwater, migratory and marine species, including sturgeon and cod, are evident at the site. The latter are relatively small in size (300-600mm), derived from the population in local Baltic waters. The presence of cod is first evident in Gdansk from the end of the thirteenth century/early fourteenth century whilst carp, present in the town from the thirteenth century, is documented at the Marienburg convent in 1396 and subsequently in the fifteenth century (Makowiecki 2003: 116; Chec 2009). This situates the most intensive phase of the Biala Gora colony within the provisioning networks promoted by the Order and its allied merchants during and after the Crusades against the Prussian tribes.

Conclusion

Excavations at Biaia Gora have revealed the presence of intensive settlement associated with the protracted process of colonisation and Christianisation of the lower Vistula valley. The colonists were engaged in a range of industrial activities, supported by a suite of natural resources and local and international trade. The proximity of the river and the woods provided the site with natural shelter within a region that remained a complex and dynamic military frontier between Pomeranian Slavs, Prussians and the Teutonic Order until the early fourteenth century. The character of the material culture, alongside the absence of segregated phases of occupation, suggests a Pomeranian community, present from the thirteenth century, was replenished by new colonists, with a period of co-existence that coincides with the events of the Prussian Crusade and intermittent warfare across the lower Vistula valley. Against this backdrop the intensity of activity at Biala Gora is remarkable. There is no evidence of fortifications; instead this appears to have been an open settlement with a possible wharf and harbour, strategically located between the river and the expansive woodland. In the later half of the thirteenth century, the colony was re-founded or further developed by a new wave of settlers who introduced a different type or firing technology, represented by significant quantities of Greyware.

[FIGURE 12 OMITTED]

Within the context of the emerging commercial networks shadowing the crusading campaigns, the site at Biala Gora 3 can be tentatively characterised at the very least as a trading post, engaged in the exploitation of a diversity of natural resources, fur processing, metal-working, and artefact and ceramic production. In contrast to the more successful trading centres established by the Teutonic Order and its allies, this outpost was neither planned as a town nor developed urban characteristics, perhaps as it was a relatively short-lived appropriation of an existing Pomeranian settlement which outlived its primary function with the dissolution of this frontier. In the absence of any evidence for destruction, the decline in activities at the site can instead be linked to the transformation of the frontier zone into a political heartland within the Ordensstaat. In 1309 the international headquarters of the Teutonic Order was relocated to Marienburg, accelerating the reconfiguration of the management of the surrounding landscape--a process that had already begun in the 1280s with the designation of the early castle as a convent (Jozwiak & Trupinda 2007). This scenario provides the strongest evidence for tentatively associating the site at Biaia Gora with the historically documented Santir--a Pomeranian Cistercian missionary outpost functioning from 1235-36 and subsequently a Teutonic Order commandery centre (rendered as Zantyr/Zantir) that was officially relocated to Marienburg c. 1280. The association between Zantyr and Biaia Gora, as well as its relocation, was maintained by local inhabitants into the eighteenth century, and remains the most likely location for the early commandery centre (Pollakowna 1967; Haftka 1971, Powierski 2003: 115).

The site at Biaia Gora contributes to the idea of a more complex process of colonisation within this borderland. Rather than simply consisting of two waves--Pomeranian and German--there were a number of sustained attempts at founding colonies east of the River Nogat from the eleventh to thirteenth centuries. This unique site retains signincant potential for contributing extensively to our understanding of the multiple waves of colonisation which eventually transformed the Vistula fenland frontier into a political and economic heartland, and of how crusading, commerce and adaptation to local environments were synchronised in the forging of a new society in the south-eastern Baltic.

Acknowledgements

The excavations at Biaia Gora were undertaken and supported by the Castle Museum in Malbork (Muzeum Zamkowe w Malborku), and the authors would like to thank all those who participated, in particular Waldemar Jaszczynski. The gradiometer survey was conducted by David Thornley (University of Reading), using a Bartington Grad 601-2 dual fluxgate gradiometer. Preparation of micro-morphological thin sections was done by John Jack (University of Reading). The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Unions Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement no. 263735. Part of the archaeobotanical work has been carried out within the parallel project 2012/05/B/ST10/00243, financed by the National Science Centre in Poland. Photographs of artefacts by Lech Okonski.

References

BISKUP, M. 1991. Das Problem der ethnischen Augehorigkeit im mittelalterlichen Landesbau in Preussen. Zum Stand der Forschung. Jahrbuch fur die Geschichte Mittel- und Ostdeutschlands 40: 3-25.

BRORSSON, T. 2012. Pottery production in the Novgorod region: local traditions and foreign influences, in M. Brisbane, N. Makarov & E. Nosov (ed.) The archaeology of medieval Novgorod in context-. 425-34. Oxford: Oxbow.

BRYKOWSKA, M. 2002. Studia nad wschodnim zasiegiem architektury ceglanej, in M. Arszynski & M. Mierzwinski (ed.) Cegla w architekturze srodkowo-wschodniej Europy: 30-42. Malbork: Muzeum Zamkowe w Malborku.

BUKO, A. 2008. The archaeology of early medieval Poland. Discoveries, hypotheses, interpretations. Leiden: Brill.

CHEC, A. 2003. Folwarki krzyzackie na terenie komturstwa malborskiego w swietle zrodel archeologicznych i historycznych, proba lokalizacji, in K. Grazawski (ed.) Pogranicze polsko-pruskie i krzyzackie: 325-38. Wloclawek: Lega.

--2009. Huntsmanship and hunting weapons in Malbork commandery, in J. Maik (ed.) Fasciculi Archaeologiae Historicae: the hunt and hunting weapons in antiquity and the Middle Ages: 95-100. Lodz: Polish Academy of Sciences.

COWGILLL, J., M. DE NEERGAARD & N. GRIFFITHS. 2000. Knives and scabbards. Woodbridge: Boydell.

CURTA, F. 2011. Medieval archaeology and ethnicity. Where are we? History Compass 9: 537-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-0542.2011.00787.x

CZAJA, R. 2006. Strefa baltycka w gospodarce europejskiej w XIII-XIV wieku ze szczegolnym uwzglednieniem Prus krzyzackich, in S. Gawlas (ed.) Ziemie polskie wobec zachodu. Studia nad rozwojem sredniowiecznej Europy. 195-246. Warszawa: DiG.

--2009. Struktura spoleczna, in M. Biskup, R. Czaja, W. Dlugokecki, M. Dygo, S. Jozwiak, A. Radziminski & J. Tandecki (ed.) Panstwo zakonu krzyzackiego w Prusach: Wladza i spoleczenstwo: 444-50. Warszawa: PWN.

DLUCOKECKI, W. 2009. Kolonizacja ziemi chelminskiej, Prus i Pomona Gdanskiego do 1410 r., in M. Biskup, R. Czaja, W. Dlugokecki, M. Dygo, S. Jozwiak, A. Radziminski & J. Tandecki (ed.) Panstwo zakonu krzyzackiego w Prusach: Wladza i spoteczenstwo: 200-17. Warszawa: PWN.

EKDAHL, S. 1998. Horses and crossbows: two important warfare advantages of the Teutonic Order in Prussia, in H. Nicholson (ed.) The military orders. Volume 2: welfare and warfare: 119-52. Aldershot: Ashgate.

HAFTKA, M. 1971. Uwagi w sprawie wczesnosredniowiecznego osadnictwa w polnocnej Pomezanii i kwestia lokalizacji Santyra. Pomorania Antiqua 4: 455-76.

JAGODZINSKI, M.F. 2004. Podstawy zrodlowe--analiza. Przekazy pisane--odkrycia archeologiczne, in J. Trupinda (ed.) Pacifica Terra: Prusowie-Slowianie-Wikingowie u ujscia Wisly: 21-40. Malbork: Muzeum Zamkowe w Malborku.

JEUTE, G.H. 2007. Social and ethnic aspects of rural non-agrarian production in Brandenburg (East Germany) in the Middle Ages and the modern era, in J. Klapste & P. Sommer (ed.) Arts and crafts in medieval rural environment (Ruralia VI): 363-73. Turnhout: Brepols.

JOSWIAK, S. & J. TRUPINDA. 2007. Organizacja zycia na zamku krzyzackim w Malborku w czasach wielkich mistrzow (1309-1457). Malbork: Muzeum Zamkowe w Malborku.

KASPRZYKOWSKI, Z. 2003. Habitat preferences of foraging rooks Corvus frugilegus during the breeding period in the agricultural landscape of eastern Poland. Acta Ornithologica 38: 27-31.

KRUPPE, J. 1981. Garncarstwo poznosredniowieczne w Polsce. Wroclaw: Zaklad Narodowy im. Ossolinskich.

MACPHAIL, R.I. & J. CROWTHER. 2009. Soil micromorphology, chemistry and magnetic susceptibility, in V. Birkbeck & J. Shuster (ed.) Living and working in Roman and later London. Excavations at 60-63 Fenchurch Street (Wessex Archaeology Reports 25): 113-20. Salisbury: Wessex Archaeology.

MACPHAIL, R.I., H. GALINIE & F. VERHAEGHE. 2003. A future for dark earth? Antiquity 77: 349-58.

MAKOWIECKI, D. 2003. Historia ryb i rybolowstwa w holocenie na Nizu Polskim w swietle badan archeoichtiologicznych. Poznan: Instytut Archeologii i Etnologii PAN.

--2009. Animals in the landscape of the medieval countryside and urban agglomerations of the Baltic Sea countries, in Citta e campagana nei secoli altomedievali: Spoleto, 27 marzo--1 aprile 2008: 427-44. Spoleto: Fondazione Centro italiano di studi sull'alto Medioevo.

MALTBY, M., A.G. PLUSKOWSKI & K. SEETAH. 2009. Animal bones from an industrial quarter at Malbork, Poland: towards an ecology of a castle built in Prussia by the Teutonic Order. Crusades 8: 191-212.

MAND, A. 2004. Beaver tails and roasted herring heads: fast as feast in late-medieval Livonia. Medium Aevum Quotidianum 50: 5-12.

MARCINKOWSKI, M. 2003. Sredniowieczny warsztat garncarski ze Starego Miasta w Elblagu. Pomorania Antiqua 19: 193-250.

MUGUREVICS, E. 2008. Viduslaiku ciems un pils Salaspils novada. Riga: LVLA.

PANER, H. 2001. 10th- to 17th-century domestic architecture in Gdansk, in B. Dahmen, M. Glaser, U. Oltmanns & S. Schindel (ed.) Lubecker Kolloquium zur Stadtarchaologie im Hanseraum III: der Hausbau: 491-509. Lubeck: Schmidt-Romhild.

PASZKIEWICZ, B. 2009. Brakteaty--pieniadz sredniowiecznych Prus. Wroclaw: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wroclawskiego.

PLUSKOWSKI, A.G. 2012. The archaeology of the Prussian Crusade: holy war and colonisation. London: Routledge.

PLUSKOWSKI, A.G., A.D. BROWN, L.-M. SHILLITO, K. SEETAH, D. MAKOWIECKI, M. JARZEBOWSKI, K. KLAVINS & J. KREEM. 2011. The Ecology of Crusading project: new research on medieval Baltic landscapes. Antiquity 85(328) Project Gallery. Available at: http://www.antiquity.ac.uk/projgall/pluskowski328/ (accessed 14 January 2014).

POLLAKOWNA, M. 1967. Zantyr. Komunikaty mazursko-warminskie 4: 413-84.

POWIERSKI, J. 2003. Prussica (I). Malbork: Muzeum Zamkowe w Malborku.

REBKOWSKI, M. 1995. Sredniowieczna ceramika miasta lokacyjnego w Kolobrzegu. Kolobrzeg: Feniks.

ROZENKRANZ, E. 1965. Ksztaltowanie sie granicy pomorsko-pruskiej w okresie od XII do poczatku XIV w. Zapiski Historyczne 30: 335-38.

SEETAH, K., A.G. PLUSKOWSKI, D. MAKOWIECKI & L. DAUGNORA. In press. New technology or adaptation at the frontier? Butchery as a signifier of cultural transitions in the medieval eastern Baltic. Archaeologia Baltic a.

TANDECKI, J. 2009. Liczebnosc i pochodzenie terytorialne (Mieszczahstwo), in M. Biskup, R. Czaja, W. Dlugokecki, M. Dygo, S. Jozwiak, A. Radziminski & J. Tandecki (ed.) Panstwo zakonu krzyzackiego w Prusach: Wladza i spoleczenstwo: 437-44. Warszawa: PWN.

TRUPINDA, J. (ed.). 2004. Terra Pacifica: Prusowie-Slowianie-Wikingowie u ujscia Wisly. Malbork: Muzeum Zamkowe w Malborku.

VLIERMAN, K. 1996. "Van zintelen, van zintelroeden ende mossen ...": een breeuwmethode als hulpmiddel bij het dateren van scheepswrakken uit de hanzetijd. Lelystad: Nederlands Instituut voor Scheeps- en Onderwaterarcheologie.
Table 1. AMS radiocarbon dates. Materials dated are all charred seeds
derived from bulk samples taken from cut-back and cleaned section
faces of excavated features.

Lab no.   T rench/feature/sample   Depth (cm)   Material dated

GU29832   Tr.6/F94/120a              60-70      Secale
GU29833   Tr.6/F94/120b              60-70      Cereal ia
GU29834   Tr.6/F94/116               20-30      Secale, Triticum
                                                  aestivum and
                                                  Agrostemma githago
GU29835   Tr.8/F99/187                0-15      Galium spurium,
                                                  Triticum, Secale
GU29836   Tr.8/F102/189               0-10      Fallopia convolvulus

Lab no.      Age (BP)       [[delta].sup.l5]C ([per thousand])

GU29832   649 [+ or -] 28                  -22.7
GU29833   713 [+ or -] 28                  -26.2
GU29834   649 [+ or -] 29                  -21.2
GU29835   816 [+ or -] 28                  -25.1
GU29836   570 [+ or -] 26                  -23.0

Lab no.       Age range (cal AD, 2[sigma])

GU29832   1281-1325 (43.1%) 1344-1394 (52.3%)
GU2983    1255-1305 (87.5%) 1364-1385 (7.9%)
GU29834   1281-1326 (43.2%) 1343-1395 (52.2%)
GU29835                1171-1268
GU29836   1307-1363 (57.3%) 1385-1421(38.1%)

Table 2. Mammal and bird bones recovered from the site of Biata Gora.

Common name                             Latin name            NISP

Domestic mammals

pig                                     Sus scrofa            554
Cattle                                  Bos taurus            381
Goat                                    Capra a. hircus        1
Sheep/goat                              Ovis aries/Capra a.    71
                                          hircus
Horse                                   Equus caballus         68
Dog                                     Canis familiaris       8
Cat                                     Felix catus            5

Wild mammals

Red deer                                Cervus elaphus         22
Roe deer                                Capreolus capreolus    5
Cervid (sp.)                            Cervus                 3
Beaver                                  Castor fiber           40
Fox                                     Vulpes vulpes          4
Bear                                    Ursus arctos           2
Hare                                    Lepus europaeus        2
Polecat                                 Mustela putorius       1
Marten                                  Martes martes          2
Otter                                   Lutra lutra            1
Rat                                     Rattus rattus          6
Shrew                                   Sorex araneus          4
Mole                                    Talpa europaea         1
Water vole                              Arvicola terrestris    2
Unidentified mammal (cattle-sized)                            803
Unidentified mammal (pig/sheep-sized)                         757

Birds

Domestic fowl                           Gallus gallus          22
Goose                                   Anser anser            3
Mallard                                 Anas platyrhynchos     1
Rook                                    Corvus frugilegus      1
Unidentified bird                                              63

Note: excludes over 2000 fragments of small mammal bone flakes
recovered through careful collection and sieving.

Table 3. Fish bones recovered from the site of Biala Gora.

Common name      Latin name                                     NISP

Pike             Esox lucius                                     32
Cyprinids        Cyprinidae                                     269
Roach            Rutilus rutilus                                 10
Roach/rudd       Rutilus rutiluslScardinius erythrophthalmus     6
Rudd             Scardinius erythrophthalmus                     3
Ide              Leuciscus idus                                  5
Asp              Aspius aspius                                   1
Tench            Tinea tinea                                     22
Bream            Abramis brama                                   51
Sichel           Pelecus cultratus                               1
Crucian carp     Carassius carassius                             4
Carp             Cyprinus carpio f. domestica                    1
Catfish          Silurus glanis                                  78
Perches          Percidae                                        18
Perch            Perea fluviatilis                               28
Pike-perch       Sander lucioperca                               21
Sturgeon         Acipenser sp.                                   1
Eel              Anguilla Anguilla                               3
Cod              Gadus morhua                                    5
Flatfishes       Pleuronectidae                                  1

Total                                                           560

Unidentifiable                                                  430


Supplementary material is provided online at http://antiquity.ac.uk/projgall/pluskowski341/

Aleksander Pluskowski (1), Zbigniew Sawicki (2), Lisa-Marie Shillito (3), Monika Badura (4), Daniel Makowiecki (5), Mirostawa Zabilska-Kunek (5), Krish Seetah (1,6) & Alexander Brown (1)

(1) Department of Archaeology, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading RG6 6AB, UK (Email: a.g.pluskowski@reading.ac.uk; author for correspondence)

(2) Muzeum Zamkowe w Malborku, Staroscihska 1, 82-200 Malbork, Poland

(3) School of History, Classics and Archaeology, University of Edinburgh, Teviot Place, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, UK

(4) Department of Plant Ecology, Laboratory ofPalaeoecology and Archaeobotany, University of Gdansk, Wita Stwosza 59, 80-308 Gdansk, Poland

(5) Institute of Archaeology, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Szosa Bydgoska 44/48, 87-100 Toruh, Poland

(6) Department of Anthropology, Stanford University, Main Quad, Building 50, 450 Serra Mall, Stanford, CA 94035, USA
联系我们|关于我们|网站声明
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有