The earliest representations of royal power in Egypt: the rock drawings of Nag el-Hamdulab (Aswan).
Hendrickx, Stan ; Darnell, John Coleman ; Gatto, Maria Carmela 等
[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]
Introduction
Sometime during the early 1890s, Archibald H. Sayce (1845-1933)
made a sketch copy of a rock drawing at Gharb Aswan (Upper Egypt) that
was subsequently included in a catalogue of inscriptions between Aswan
and Kom Ombo published by de Morgan et al. (1894: 203) (Figure 1). At
that moment, hardly anything was known about the earliest history of
Egypt, and the Early Dynastic royal necropolis at Abydos would only be
discovered a few years later. Famous documents such as the Narmer
palette or the Scorpion mace head, both found at Hierakonpolis in 1898,
had not yet been excavated. Consequently, Sayce had no documentation at
his disposal that would have allowed him to recognise the early date of
the scene, and he may not even have been aware that what he had copied
was actually a very early royal representation. The brief description
and rudimentary drawing of but a portion of the overall imagery at the
site remained unnoticed for over a century until, in 2008, Nabil Swelim
made available to one of the authors a photograph of a rock drawing
(Figure 2), said to be from near Aswan (Hendrickx et al. 2009b). The
photograph came from the unpublished documentation of the late Labib
Habachi (1906-1984, see Kamil 2007), and a search of his archive kept at
Chicago House in Luxor at the end of 2009 revealed a series of related
photographs. Meanwhile, Maria C. Gatto had rediscovered the site itself
(Hendrickx & Gatto 2009), thereby revealing that Sayce's
imperfect hand copy did not concern a single rock art scene, but was
rather an excerpt from one of a number of scenes located at short
distances from each other. More recently, while working in the local
ancient quarries, the QuarryScapes project encountered some of those
drawings (Storemyr 2009). The ensemble of the site, presented here for
the first time, makes up the most important iconographic source for the
period of state formation in Egypt.
[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]
The rediscovered and newly discovered rock art sites that form the
Nag el-Hamdulab ensemble are located on the rocks confining a sandy
plain west of the village of Nag el-Hamdulab, on the west bank of the
Nile, about 6km north of Aswan (Figure 3). Unfortunately, several
inscription areas at the site have been heavily damaged during the last
decades. At present, seven sites, most of them consisting of more than
one tableau, are known at short distances from each other (Figure 4).
Important portions of the lost or damaged tableaux--but unfortunately
not all of the lost and damaged elements--may be reconstructed on the
basis of photographic documentation from the Labib Habachi Archive.
Stylistic and technical peculiarities suggest that all the main tableaux
with human figures are the work of only one or two hands. All
representations are pecked with a pointed implement; the contour lines
of the individual representations are clearly delineated but a number of
them were more elaborately worked by pecking the interior surface to
achieve a flat, sunken surface (Figure 2).
[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 3 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 4 OMITTED]
Chronology
The rock inscriptions at Nag el-Hamdulab comprise a series of
discrete vignettes that represent elements of an overall cycle of images
involving hunting, warfare, nautical festival events, and the regalia of
political authority. An anonymous king wearing the White Crown appears
in three tableaux and defines the context for all the discrete portions
of the overall site.
[FIGURE 5 OMITTED]
Before discussing individual tableaux, a consideration of the
chronological position of the Nag el-Hamdulab rock art is fundamental
for understanding the ensemble, and has already received some discussion
(Hendrickx & Gatto 2009; Hendrickx et al. in press). The royal scene
at site 7 (Figure 2) shows several similarities to the Scorpion mace
head (Oxford AM E.3632), the Narmer mace head (Oxford AM E.3631), and
the Narmer palette (Cairo JdE. 32169) (here Figure 5). The Scorpion mace
head slightly predates the Narmer monuments and starting from the Nag
el-Hamdulab scenes, a striking increase in size difference between the
king and his retinue can be observed. This accords with the development
of the representation of Dynastic Egyptian conventions. Furthermore, the
tip of the White Crown points straight upward at Nag el-Hamdulab, while
that on the Scorpion mace head tilts slightly towards the back. On the
Narmer palette, the crown is still slightly further tilted and worn in
the oblique position that will be standard throughout the rest of
Egyptian history. Finally, the representations of the standard and
fan-bearers provide relevant information. At Nag el-Hamdulab the king is
preceded by two standard-bearers and followed by a fan-bearer. On the
Scorpion mace head, the king is preceded by two standard-bearers and
followed by two fan-bearers. On the Narmer mace head, two fan-bearers
stand beside the high podium on which the king sits enthroned, while
four standard-bearers advance towards the king. On the Narmer palette,
four standard-bearers are present, although the fan-bearers are lacking.
The doubling of the fan and standard-bearers confirms that the Nag
el-Hamdulab tableaux occupy a chronological position before the Scorpion
mace head.
Boats form a characteristic element of the Nag el-Hamdulab tableaux
and nearly all of them are of the so-called 'sickle shaped'
type with 'clubbed' ends (Figures 6-9), already occurring
frequently in rock art and on pre-Dynastic 'Decorated' pottery
(Graff 2009: 171), the latter dating to the Naqada IIC-D period, c.
3600-3300 BC, although the prows and sterns of Nag el-Hamdulab boats
turn up higher. Boats with high prows, but without the
'clubbed' ends, occur during the late pre-Dynastic and Early
Dynastic period (Huyge 2002: 198), and the Nag el-Hamdulab boats seem to
be at an intermediate position. The dog accompanying the king appears to
represent a late occurrence of the canid as a symbol of human
organisation and the domination of chaotic forces (Hendrickx 2006;
compare also Darnell 2011: 1166-69), and speaks for an earlier date for
the Hamdulab tableaux during the period of transition between
pre-Dynastic iconography and Dynastic imagery because the dog no longer
occurs in this context on the Scorpion mace head or the Narmer
monuments.
[FIGURE 6 OMITTED]
The form of the boat and the important parallels between the Nag
el-Hamdulab tableaux and the Scorpion and Narmer documents suggest that
a late Dynasty 0 date, c. 3200-3100 BC, is most probable for the Nag
el-Hamdulab tableaux, placing the ensemble at a highly important moment
in the process of state formation in Egypt.
The scenes
The uniformity in style and the interrelations between the sites
and tableaux suggest that the Nag el-Hamdulab cycle of images is the
result of a premeditated 'grand scheme,' rather than the
consequence of artists adding scene upon scene over time. All of the
tableaux are to be considered in the same context and are elements of
the conceptualisation of the Nag el-Hamdulab landscape. Another
important observation is that the artist(s) preferred rock surfaces with
straight, vertical faces. Several times, the drawings begin at the
right-hand edge of the rock edges, even when plenty of space is
available to the left. Such organisation is exceptional for rock art,
where the artists generally start from the centre of the available
surface. For the Nag el-Hamdulab scenes, this could indicate that the
artist(s) were normally working on other media; apparently they were
accustomed to rectangular surfaces, on which they started working from
the right edge. This fits very well with scribal practice--writing on
for example papyrus--and indicates that the artist(s) at Nag el-Hamdulab
were professionals; at this very early moment in Egyptian history they
must have been directly related to the royal court.
The present article summarises the most important tableaux,
following their order from north to south. Site 1 is located on a
protruding rock, forming a highly visible orientation point at the
intersection between the Wadi el-Faras and the Nag el-Hamdulab bay,
almost as a 'boundary stone' (Figure 4). A boat dominates each
of the two tableaux at this site, once with the representation of a
prostrate, feather-wearing man--prisoner or allied foreigner--and once
with three prisoners following the boat (Figure 6). The identification
of the latter as prisoners is not straightforward but results from
comparison with other late pre-Dynastic and Early Dynastic documents on
which prisoners are systematically identified by having their arms bound
behind the back, often being tied by a rope at their neck as well.
Visually, a 'triangle' or a curved line behind their back
indicates the pinioned arms, with no indication of arms in front of the
prisoner's chest. Especially relevant is the scene on the Qustul
Incense Burner (Chicago OIM.24069) showing a prisoner to the right of
the boat with a lion(?) (the man does not greet the vessel; Hendrickx
& Eyckerman 2010: 131). What might appear as a 'raised
arm' is thinner than the arm behind the back, and gently curved in
a manner most unlikely for a real appendage, while the arm behind the
back is bent at a suitable angle. The figure represents a prisoner
attached to the boat, a motif appearing beyond doubt on the Gebel Sheikh Suleiman relief (Murnane in Williams & Logan 1987: 282-84). The
scenes from site 1 introduce two essential elements of the decoration
scheme at Nag el-Hamdulab--boats and military domination. Although this
combination may not seem logical, none of the tableaux shows a
narrative, and all of the groups are highly symbolic. The idea of power
receives expression not solely or even primarily through human
representations but through the images of boats, which are the main
elements of the nautical procession that is essential for the
interpretation of the Nag el-Hamdulab scenes (compare boats that convey
symbolic, rather than narrative, information in rock art and on
'Decorated Ware' ceramics--Huyge 2002; Graft 2009; Hendrickx
& Eyckerman 2010).
[FIGURE 7 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 8 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 9 OMITTED]
Sites 2 to 5 are located very close to each other, on the cliffs at
the centre of the Nag el-Hamdulab plain (Figure 4). At site 2 the
military theme is integrated into a socio-religious context. The first
of the two main tableaux at site 2 shows bowmen and prisoners next to a
boat that has a figure on top of each of its two cabins (Figure 7). Both
of these figures on the cabins hold a stick or staff, and may represent
the occupants of the cabins, although their precise meaning--presumably
religious and/or political--remains unclear. Between the two bowmen
behind the boat is a smaller person with one arm bent behind the back
and the other upturned before the chest, in a manner unlike any other
representation at Nag el-Hamdulab. The best parallel is a prisoner on
the recto of the Battlefield Palette, from whose neck hangs a type of
weight (Spencer 1980: 79-80, no. 576). This provides a strong indication
that the scene depicts a prisoner with his arms bound behind his back
and attached by a rope to the bow. In front of the boat is a single
person standing behind a very large bow. A close parallel occurs on a
fragmentary knife handle from cemetery U at Abydos (Dreyer 1999: fig.
10b), and the bow is an element of power in itself, regularly appearing
without human presence.
The second important tableau of site 2 consists of two boats, one
roughly above the other (Figure 8). Both boats have many oars and an
oarsman on the stern, in contrast to most of the other Nag el-Hamdulab
boats, indications already of the importance of the scene. The lower
boat is of the regular 'sickle shaped' type but has as a
remarkable element, a bull standard, on its prow. The upper boat has a
very high prow and stern, both of which are very narrow, and a single,
very low cabin on which stands a king wearing the White Crown. In front
of the ruler is a standard with Wepwaout, 'Opener of the
Ways', a canid god related to warfare and hunting. This second type
of boat occurs only once more at Nag el-Hamdulab, where it carries a
shrine, indicating that a divine boat is intended (see below, Figure
11). Therefore, the Nag el-Hamdulab cycle introduces the king as a
religious concept rather than as a representation of actual military or
political power.
The most important tableaux from site 3 have been destroyed and are
only (incompletely) known through archival photographs. In two scenes,
the king appeared in a ceremonial procession with his retinue, including
a number of prisoners. A boat appears in one of the tableaux (Figure 9),
forming a link to the other sites. But despite this symbolic element,
the king now clearly appears as an actual ruler, the religious context
being of but secondary importance. The only preserved tableau of site 3
shows a man leading a (wild?) bull and calf. Behind this is the image of
a large knife, indicating that the group concerns sacrificial
animals--the ceremony central to the Nag el-Hamdulab cycle is now placed
in the context of meat offering, probably wild animals.
The site 4 tableau is a small but very direct and therefore
important addition in which the actual feast on occasion of the festival
is referenced through the representation of brewing, and a person
sitting and drinking. Next to this, and on a larger scale, is a person
apparently identified as a Nubian by a particular type of bow depicted
in front of him. Nubia was known as the 'Land of the Bow', the
frontier of which was at the First Cataract, immediately south of Nag
el-Hamdulab. Recent research has shown an important presence of Nubians
in the Aswan region during pre-Dynastic times (Gatto 2011) and the
Nubian in the Hamdulab tableau may represent a chieftain or military
commander of the Nubian denizens of the Hamdulab region, or another area
immediately to the south thereof.
[FIGURE 10 OMITTED]
Site 5 is located left of the entrance of the only rockshelter
present at Nag el-Hamdulab. The small tableau is heavily damaged by more
recent drawings and inscriptions which are, however, no part of the
recent vandalism. The tableau consists of a bull's head and a
female dancer. The latter can easily be identified by the long hair
braid ending in an oval shape that represents one of the rounded weights
(discs or balls?) attached to the braided hair of female dancers during
the Old Kingdom (e.g. Graves-Brown 2010: 93). The combination of a
bull's head and a female dancer is not as strange as it may seem at
first view because the combination of hunting, butchering, music and
dance is known from the early Old Kingdom onwards through the Ladies of
the Acacia House (Hendrickx et al. 2009a: 212-14). This ritual context
combines well with the reference to the actual feast at site 4.
Site 6 is located on an isolated hill at the southern end of the
Nag el-Hamdulab sandy bay, relatively close to the alluvial plain, and
comprises only one tableau, consisting of three registers showing cattle
controlled by humans and dogs (Figure 10). Two possible interpretations
of the scene present themselves, and the proper understanding of the
group hinges on the wild or domesticated nature of the animals
represented. The theme of catching and bringing up wild animals is most
important for pre-Dynastic times (Hendrickx 2010; Graft et al. 2011).
Although archaeozoological studies show that hunting was only of
marginal economic importance during pre-Dynastic times (Linseele &
Van Neer 2009), hunting scenes are nevertheless an important element of
pre-Dynastic iconography. Hunting was part of the elite lifestyle, and
slaughtering wild animals on the occasion of religious festivals or
elite burials (Friedman 2008, 2009; Linseele et al. 2009) allowed the
upper echelons of society to show their importance in real life,
confirmed through visual representations which contributed to the
establishment of hierarchic structures and ultimately state formation
(Hendrickx 2010). Alternatively, the animals may represent the wealth of
local, probably Nubian, cattle-herding groups (for a Nubian presence in
the First Cataract area and beyond see Gatto 2006, 2011), perhaps the
economic basis for the power of the subjugated and/or allied Nubian
ruler appearing in a scene at site 1. In the latter case, the dog atop
the back of the uppermost bovid is not attacking, but rather
symbolically dominating, the beast (for canids doing both in a single
tableau, see Darnell 2011: 1166-69).
[FIGURE 11 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 12 OMITTED]
Site 7, already seen by Sayce at the end of the nineteenth century,
is the most important in size and can be considered the culmination of
the concept behind the Nag el-Hamdulab cycle. Located south of the Nag
el-Hamdulab sandy bay, in a narrow gulch in the rock cliff, the site
consists of four tableaux, among which two are particularly large. The
first of these is visible with some difficulty from a distance and is
not really in a 'hidden' position, unlike the second large
tableau that can only be seen from inside the bay. The first tableau is
the largest at Nag el-Hamdulab, and is already for that reason of
primary importance. The scene is organised around five boats, four of
which are grouped in a row, slanting slightly upwards to the right,
while the fifth is placed at a higher position (Figure 11). Despite the
size and the importance of the boats, the focal element of the tableau
is the representation of a ruler, followed by a fan-bearer and preceded
by a dog and two standard-bearers, situated above the only boat with an
elaborately decorated cabin. The king wears the White Crown and holds a
long prototypical heqa-sceptre. Four of the five boats are of the
regular 'sickle shaped' type. On the most elaborately drawn,
not by coincidence below the king, a falcon standard can be seen, while
three of the boats have a standard with bull horns. Both the falcon and
the bull are royal symbols, emphasising the royal character of the
boats. The fifth boat is placed rather awkwardly at the bottom of the
tableau, beneath the 'royal boat'. The prow and stern are not
broad and rounded, but the prow is narrow and makes a hook while the
stern ends in a straight top line. The boat has only a single domed or
vaulted cabin, the decoration of which represents a door with the rolled
up door curtain, identical to the false doors on Old Kingdom funerary monuments. An important number of parallel representations indicate that
the cabin represents a shrine, transforming the vessel into a
'divine boat' and placing the tableau in a religious context.
In front of the 'royal boat' are four bearded persons, their
arms beside their bodies, holding a horizontal line representing a rope.
Although the rope does not touch the boat, the men most likely represent
people towing the boat, a theme that occurs regularly in rock art. The
whole of the tableau allows an exceptional view on the idea of a boat
procession. The ritual event is under the direct supervision of the king
and his retinue and the general idea is that of a display of royal power
in the religious context of a boat procession. The boats and the king
with his retinue face towards Elephantine, perhaps--given the
site's importance during the Early Dynastic period as border town
controlling the First Cataract--the ultimate destination of the
procession. The reality of such an event is confirmed by a small tableau
to the left of the one under discussion, in which a small boat appears
below a long row of small vertical lines--approximately 56--that may
represent an aid to counting strokes.
The final element of the first tableau at site 7 is a four-sign
hieroglyphic inscription immediately behind the stern of the uppermost
boat and above the prow of the final vessel (Figure 11). The hieroglyphs
are fully pecked in the style of the images of the tableaux, possess the
same degree of patination, and are certainly elements of the tableau.
Palaeographically of Early Dynastic date, the annotation refers to a
'nautical following' and appears to label the imagery--and
apparently the entirety of the Nag el-Hamdulab cycle--as ultimately
related to the royal and ritual event known as the 'Following of
Horus', the biennial judicial and tax-collecting perambulation of
the royal court as demonstration of royal authority, here further
related to a toponym that unfortunately cannot be located (cf. Wilkinson
1999: 220-21).
Continuing from the first tableau at site 7 into the bay, the rock
surface slopes backwards and exhibits too many irregularities for
decoration. After this comes another flat surface, bearing the second
large tableau (Figure 12), which consists of six animals, to which an
Eighteenth Dynasty text was added afterwards. Starting in the lower left
corner are two ostriches close to each other with a large ibex above
them; to the right of the ostriches is a large bull, next to which are
two enigmatic animals, one above the other. The animals (with the
exception of the bull) face into the gulch, contrary to the orientation
of the first tableau. The two peculiar animals to the right have bodies
that look rather like those of dogs or lions but their 'heads'
bear no comparison to that of any known animal. Each 'head'
consists of five or six lines, the uppermost of which is shorter and
parallel with a similar line formed by the backline of the animal; there
is no indication at all of mouth, eyes or nose. Furthermore, the animals
have extremely long tails, making an elongated 'S' above their
back. The images appear to depict a non-existent,
'mythological' animal, a well-known aspect of late
pre-Dynastic iconography (Huyge 2004). Already the mere presence of
these animals indicates that symbolism plays an important role for
interpreting the tableau. Also, the orientation is of primary
importance. The animals face to the right, into the gulch, with the
exception of the bull, which is the only animal in the group that faces
in the same direction as the king in the other tableau. As the bull is a
royal symbol, this allows one to consider the animal as a parallel for
the king in tableau 1a (not illustrated) and as 'dominating'
the animals around it. As desert animals, the ibex and ostriches are
chaotic elements as confirmed by the two mythological animals that
represent even more explicit aspects of chaos. Furthermore, these occur
at the end of the gulch, which as the most remote/hidden location also
refers to chaos. The ultimate meaning of the tableau is the royal, human
assurance of control, the triumph of order over chaos on a cosmic level,
referring eventually also to regeneration. The link between site 7 and
those previously described is not only made by the royal image, the
boats, and the concept of ritual processions, but also by a small--and
unfortunately poorly preserved--hunting scene close to the royal boat
procession.
Concluding remarks
The combination of a boat procession, hunting, solar symbolism, and
the general theme of order over chaos fits very well with the concept of
the 'Greater Pharaonic Cycle' as defined by Williams and Logan
(1987), especially when considering that the theme of military victory
occurs at other Nag el-Hamdulab rock art sites. In the Hamdulab cycle
also appears the image of a prostrate man with a feather, arms stretched
before him, an apparent visual reference to royal domination of
potentially chaotic humans, a ritual manifestation of the more bellicose and physical expression of the same domination of human disorder
appearing elsewhere at Hamdulab in the scene of two bowmen with a
prisoner between them. The theme of military domination of human chaos,
parallel to hunting as the ordering of the potentially chaotic, natural
world, is very much part of the overall scheme of the Hamdulab imagery.
The Nag el-Hamdulab cycle is unique and bridges the iconographic
worlds of the pre-Dynastic and Dynastic Jubilee images; it is a hybrid
of the two. Whereas pre-Dynastic scenes are either one long
illustration, a fluid blending of the events, or represent individual
vignettes from the cycle (Darnell 2009), the Dynastic scenes--from
Narmer forward--are more often broken up by the key events, divided into
registers, just as the Hamdulab tableaux appear to separate certain
events, and assign particular symbolism and meaning to each tableau of
the greater cycle. The Nag el-Hamdulab scenes stress the nautical
aspect, the pre-Dynastic focus of the event, but divide the event into
distinct sequences. The Nag el-Hamdulab cycle is the earliest group of
complex images of religious activity incorporating the king wearing a
recognisable crown of pharaonic regalia, and the last of the large,
nautical Jubilee cycles of the Naqada II period. Whereas earlier the
concept of kingship was an important element, beginning with the Nag
el-Hamdulab cycle, the presence of the physical king presiding over the
events takes precedence over symbolism alluding to royalty. The Nag
el-Hamdulab cycle may be said to show the emergence of the ruler as
supreme human priest and incarnate manifestation of human and divine
power. The Nag el-Hamdulab cycle is also the first complex iconographic
composition with accompanying hieroglyphic annotation. That text refers
to the 'Nautical Following (of Horus)', the biennial progress
of the royal court on a perambulating judicial and tax-collecting visit
to demonstrate royal authority throughout the land, and may therefore be
the earliest record of tax collection we have from Egypt, and the first
expression of royal economic control over Egypt and most probably also
Nubia.
Acknowledgements
We thank W.R. Johnson for access to the Labib Habachi archive in
Chicago House, Luxor, and permission to publish Figures 2 and 9. We want
to thank Tina Di Cerbo for her help in accessing the Habachi Archive.
Special thanks to Morgan De Dapper and Ilka Klose for the
geomorphological study; Antonio Curci and Alberto Urcia for the digital
documentation; Giandaniele Castangia, Stefano Caruso, Hannah Joris and
Merel Eyckerman for the drawings; and Daniel Libens for the photography.
References
DARNELL, J.C. 2009. Iconographic attraction, iconographic syntax
and the tableaux of royal ritual power in the pre- and proto-Dynastic
rock inscriptions of the Theban Western Desert. Archeo-Nil 19: 83-107.
--2011. The Wadi of the Horus Qa-a: a tableau of royal ritual power
in the Theban Western Desert, in R.F. Friedman & P.N. Fiske (ed.)
Egypt at its origins 3. Proceedings of the International Conference
'Origin of the State. Predynastic and Early Dynastic Egypt',
London, 27 July-1 August 2008 (Orientalia Lovaniensia Analecta 205):
1151-93. Leuven: Peeters.
DE MORGAN, J., U. BOURIANT, G. LEGRAN, G. JEQUIER & A.
BARSANTI. 1894. Catalogue des monuments et inscriptions de l'Egypte
antique. Premiere serie. Haute Egypte. Tome premier. De la frontiere de
Nubie a Kom Ombo. Vienne: Adolphe Holzhausen.
DREYER, G. 1999. Motive und Datierung der dekorierten
pradynastischen Messergriffe, in C. Ziegler (ed.) L'art de
l'Ancien Empire egyptien: 195-226. Paris: Louvre.
FRIEDMAN, R.F. 2008. Excavating Egypt's early kings: recent
discoveries in the elite cemetery at Hierakonpolis, in B. Midant-Reynes
& Y. Tristant (ed.) Egypt at its origins 2. Proceedings of the
International Conference 'Origin of the state, Predynastic and
Early Dynastic Egypt', Toulouse (France), 5-8 September 2005
(Orientalia Lovaniensia Analecta 172): 1157-94. Leuven: Peeters.
--2009. Hierakonpolis locality HK29A: the Predynastic ceremonial
centre revisited. Journal of the American Research Center in Egypt 45:
79-103.
GATTO, M.C. 2006. The Nubian A-Group: a reassessment. Archeo-Ni1
16: 61-76.
--2011. Egypt and Nubia in the 5th-4th millennia Be: a view from
the First Cataract and its surroundings, in R.F. Friedman & P.N.
Fiske (ed.) Egypt at its origins 3. Proceedings of the International
Conference "Origin of the State. Predynastic and Early Dynastic
Egypt', London, 27 July-1 August 2008 (Orientalia Lovaniensia
Analecta 205): 859-77. Leuven: Peeters.
GRAFF, G. 2009. Les peintures sur vases de Nagada I-Nagada II.
Nouvelle approche semiologique de l'iconographie predynastique
(Egyptian Prehistory Monographs 6). Leuven: Leuven University Press.
GRAFF, G., M. EYCKERMAN & S. HENDRICKX. 2011. Architectural
elements on Decorated pottery and ritual presenting of desert animals,
in R.F. Friedman & P.N. Fiske (ed.) Egypt at its origins 3.
Proceedings of the International Conference 'Origin of the State.
Predynastic and Early Dynastic Egypt; London, 27 July-1 August 2008
(Orientalia Lovaniensia Analecta 205): 437-65. Leuven: Peeters.
GRAVES-BROWN, C. 2010. Dancing for Hathor. Women in ancient Egypt.
London: Continuum.
HENDRICKX, S. 2006. The dog, the Lycaon pictus and order over chaos
in Predynastic Egypt, in K. Kroeper, M. Chlodnicki & M. Kobusiewicz
(ed.) Archaeology of early Northeastern Africa. In memory of Lech Krzyzaniak (Studies in African Archaeology 9): 723-49. Poznan: Poznan
Archaeological Museum.
--2010. L'iconographie de la chasse dans le contexte social
predynastique. Archdo-Nil 20: 106-33.
HENDRICKX, S. & M. EYCKERMAN. 2010. Continuity and change in
the visual representations of Predynastic Egypt, in F. Raffaele, M.
Nuzzolo & I. Incordino (ed.) Recent discoveries and latest
researches in Egyptology Proceedings of the First Neapolitan Congress of
Egyptology. Naples, 18-20 June 2008: 121-44. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
HENDRICKX, S. & M.C. GATTO. 2009. A rediscovered Late
Predynastic-Early Dynastic royal scene from Gharb Aswan. Sahara 20:
147-50.
HENDRICKX, S., H. RIEMER, F. FORSTER & J.C. DARNELL. 200%. Late
Predynastic-Early Dynastic rock art scenes of Barbary sheep hunting from
Egypt's Western Desert. From capturing wild animals to the women of
the 'Acacia House', in H. Riemer, F. Forster, M. Herb & N.
Pollath (ed.) Desert animals in the eastern Sahara: status, economic
significance and cultural reflection in antiquity. Proceedings of an
interdisciplinary ACACIA workshop held at the University of Cologue,
14-15 December 2007 (Colloquium Africanum 4): 189-244. Koln:
Heinrich-Barth-Institut.
HENDRICKX, S., N. SWELIM, F. RAFFAELE, M. EYCKERMAN & R.F.
FRIEDMAN. 2009b. A lost Late Predynastic-Early Dynastic royal scene from
Gharb Aswan. Archeo-Nil 19: 169-78.
HENDRICKX, S., J.C. DARNELL, M.C. GATTO & M. EYCKERMAN. In
press. Iconographic and palaeographic elements dating a Dynasty 0 rock
art site at Nag el-Hamdulab (Aswan, Egypt), in D. Huyge & F. Van
Noten (ed.) The signs of which times? Chronological and
palaeoenvironmental issues in the rock art of Northern Africa. Brussels:
Royal Academy for Overseas Sciences.
HUYGE, D. 2002. Cosmology, ideology and personal religious practice
in ancient Egyptian rock art, in R.F. Friedman (ed.) Egypt and Nubia.
Gifts of the desert:. 192-206. London: British Museum Press.
--2004. A double-powerful device for regeneration: the Abu Zaidan
knife handle reconsidered, in S. Hendrickx, R.F. Friedman, K.M.
Cialowicz & M. Chlodnicki (ed.) Egypt at its Origins. Studies in
memory of Barbara Adams. Proceedings of the International Conference
"Origin of the State. Predynastic and Early Dynastic Egypt; Krakow,
28 August-1 September 2002 (Orientalia Lovaniensia Analecta 138):
823-36. Leuven: Peeters.
KAMIL, J. 2007. Labib Habachi. The life and legacy of an
Egyptologist. Cairo: American University in Cairo Press.
LINSEELE, V. & W. VAN NEER. 2009. Exploitation of desert and
other wild game in ancient Egypt: the archaeozoological evidence from
the Nile valley, in H. Riemer, F. Forster, M. Herb & N. Pollath
(ed.) Desert animals in the eastern Sahara: status, economic
significance and cultural reflection in antiquity. Proceedings of an
interdisciplinary ACACIA workshop held at the University of Cologne,
14-15 December 2007 (Colloquium Africanum 4): 47-78. Koln:
Heinrich-Barth-Institut.
LINSEELE, V., W. VAN NEER & R.F. FRIEDMAN. 2009. Special
animals from a special place? The fauna from HK29A at Predynastic
Hierakonpolis. Journal of the American Research Center in Egypt 45:
105-36.
SPENCER, A.J. 1980. Catalogue of Egyptian antiquities in the
British Museum, V. Early Dynastic objects. London: British Museum
Publications.
STOREMYR, P. 2009. A prehistoric geometric rock art landscape by
the First Nile Cataract. Archeo-Nil 19: 121-50.
WILKINSON, T.A.H. 1999. Early Dynastic Egypt. London: Routledge.
WILLIAMS, B.B. & T.J. LOGAN. 1987. The Metropolitan Museum
knife handle and aspects of pharaonic imagery before Narmer. Journal of
Near Eastern Studies 46: 245-86.
Received: 16 September 2011; Accepted: 23 January 2012; Revised: 26
March 2012
Stan Hendrickx (1), John Coleman Darnell (2) & Maria Carmela
Gatto (2)
(1) Media, Arts & Design Faculty, Elfde Liniestraat 25,
Hasselt, B-3118, Belgium (Author for correspondence, email:
s.hendrickx@pandora.be)
(2) Department of Near Eastern Languages and Civilizations, Yale
University, P.O. Box 208236, New Haven, CT 06520-8236, USA (Email:
john.darnell@yale.edu; maria.gatto@yale.edu)