首页    期刊浏览 2025年02月25日 星期二
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Rita P. Wright. The ancient Indus: urbanism, economy and society.
  • 作者:Manuel, Mark
  • 期刊名称:Antiquity
  • 印刷版ISSN:0003-598X
  • 出版年度:2011
  • 期号:June
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:Cambridge University Press
  • 摘要:Since its 'discovery' in the 1920s the Indus civilisation has, on the one hand, fascinated scholars; but on
  • 关键词:Books

Rita P. Wright. The ancient Indus: urbanism, economy and society.


Manuel, Mark


RITA P. WRIGHT. The ancient Indus: urbanism, economy and society. x+396 pages, 78 illustrations, 13 tables. 2010. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 978-0-521-57219-4 hardback $85 & 45 [pounds sterling]; 978-0-521-57652-9 paperback $27.99 & 15.99 [pounds sterling].

Since its 'discovery' in the 1920s the Indus civilisation has, on the one hand, fascinated scholars; but on

the other, it remained the poor cousin of Egyptian and Mesopotamian scholarly research. Whilst the lack of monumental architecture, a deciphered script, or depictions of elites may have dissuaded a number of scholars, it has presented a group of hardy archaeologists with the challenge of understanding an early complex society from excavation and survey data alone.

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

Wright's book, The ancient Indus: urbanism, economy and society, aims to do this, presenting in detail the archaeological evidence from a broad sweep of sites, sources and periods. Ranging from the development of agriculture and the domestication of animals and plants at Mehrgarh to the breakdown of urban society, the core chapters of the book cover the key periods in sequential order. It begins with an in-depth look at the palaeogeography and hydrology of the Greater Indus region, and the varied topographical and climatic conditions within which this civilisation emerged. It goes on to explore the origins of sedentism and the movement of settlements from the upland areas of Baluchistan to the Indus plain itself. Subsequent chapters examine the function, morphology and political organisation of the urban centres; a heavy focus on what Wright terms 'agro-pastoral and craft--producing economies'; long distance trade; the social landscape of the Indus; and its religion and ideology. The book ends on a discussion of the breakdown of urban society.

The real strength of The ancient Indus is the focus on new research that allows the book to break from the traditional Wheeler-derived paradigms of statehood, rigid planning and hereditary elites, and shift the focus onto ideas of city-states, competing groups of elites, and urban-rural dichotomies. The reconstruction of manufacturing processes and techniques bring the artefacts to life in a way that few other fields can match. Indeed, it is Wright's analysis of craft specialisation--in particular seals, and the terracotta and stone figurines from Harappa and Mohenjo-daro--that are the stand-out features of the book. Decades of archaeological and ethnographic work by a number of scholars culminate here in a highly detailed record of not only how such artefacts were produced, but also the debitage generated. Craft specialisation is Wright's area of expertise, and it shows through in the chapters on craft-producing economies.

Wright's references to her own work within the Indus, ranging from excavating at Mehrgarh as a graduate student to conducting her own survey within the Beas River lend an air of competence with the material, as well as adding a personal touch to such a detailed book. While some may be put off by the use of the first-person within textbooks, to others it creates an air of informality. It allows the reader to understand that these are the interpretations of an individual, and not necessarily the collective, agreed norms. This leads to one of the few criticisms of the book: that Wright tends to shy away from some of the more contentious, and interesting, debates within the subject. For instance, the issue of whether social, political and arte-factual homogeneity is achieved through co-operation or coercion. Or that the 'decline' of the Indus is really only a collapse of the urban infrastructure--most artefactual, subsistence and architectural facets of the Indus are maintained, and even developed, on the peripheries. The lack of theoretical debate underpinning the archaeological interpretation means that at times The ancient Indus can seem a little dry and data heavy. However, this should not detract from the valuable archaeological information that lies within. Currently, no other book offers such an in-depth review of Indus studies.

MARK MANUEL

Department of Archaeology, Durham University, UK (Email: m.j.manuel@durham.ac.uk)
联系我们|关于我们|网站声明
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有