Claire Smith & H. Martin Wobst (ed.). Indigenous Archaeologies: Decolonizing Theory and Practice.
Smith, Laurajane
CLAIRE SMITH & H. MARTIN WOBST (ed.). Indigenous Archaeologies:
Decolonizing Theory and Practice (One World Archaeology 47). xxiv+ 408
pages, 84 illustrations, 6 tables. 2005. Abingdon & New York:
Routledge; 0-415-30965-4 hardback 85 [pounds sterling].
Indigenous commentary on archaeological knowledge and practice
became a public issue in the late 1960s. In the intervening decades, the
level of criticism and debate surrounding the intersection of Indigenous
communities with archaeological practice has intensified. In many ways,
archaeology has benefited from this scrutiny, particularly as it brought
about the critical acknowledgment of the many consequences the
discipline's colonial history has had, and indeed continues to
have, on the ways archaeology understands itself and operates. This
reflection has led archaeological thought to enter a debate over ethics,
which in turn has encouraged discussion and insight into the cultural
and political consequences of archaeological knowledge production.
Archaeological relationships with community groups have also been
re-examined and re-negotiated, often--but not always--with positive
results for both parties. As a consequence, literature on the topic of
Indigenous relations with archaeology has increased markedly over the
last decade. While this has primarily occurred in relation to issues of
reburial and repatriation, it has also taken place within the context of
community involvement in archaeological research and heritage management
activities.
Indigenous Archaeologies not only offers a comprehensive and
significant contribution to these debates, it is also one of those
publications that defines and precipitates an important turning point.
This book is a 'must have' for any archaeological library that
supports teaching or research on Indigenous issues, and community issues
more generally. The volume's wide range of topics draws on over 30
years' cumulative experience; it also includes more general
reflections on the state of archaeological theory, ethical practice and
identity politics, and makes specific inroads into those contentious
issues of power and control that continue to mitigate the relationships
between archaeologists and community groups. This is the first book on
such a topic where Indigenous authors dominate--it is not a book, as its
editors note, that is 'done "on" Indigenous peoples, but
one that is done "with'" them (p. 7). The sense of mutual
reflection, respect and partnership that individually and collectively
emerges from the chapters signals not only a growing maturity and
sophistication, but offers the much needed guidance for developing
collegiate and mutually aware practices between Indigenous cultural
aspirations and archaeological agendas.
While many of the case studies in the volume focus upon Australian
and North American contexts, the wide-ranging experiences, expertise and
viewpoints expressed in the 21 chapters add breadth and scope to the
volume. The volume has four sections. The first, 'Theoretical
Foundations', presents a range of papers that collectively unpick
and examine the theoretical underpinnings that have contributed to--and
continue to allow--colonial uses of archaeological knowledge. Arguments
about the utility of recognising the legitimacy of different ways of
knowing about the past (Wobst, Harris, Nicholas) are also made. While
this may not be new, what is significant and useful here is that these
arguments are made in the context of debate about the cultural and
political consequences of both archaeological theory and practice.
Papers by Harris, Million and Bruchac offer insights into how Indigenous
knowledge may inform both archaeological theory and practice,
demonstrating in the process the utility of politically and culturally
informed archaeological practice. Part two, 'Reclaiming the
Past', revisits the debates surrounding the confrontation between
Indigenous knowledge and archaeological practice, particularly in
relation to the control of human remains. Chapters by May et al. and
Carlson powerfully document some of the historical interactions between
archaeologists and communities, while papers by Stamp and Longenecker
and Watkins discuss the contemporary implications of the Kennewick case.
In his chapter, Watkins actively moves discussions on from the stalemate created by the traditional framing of debates as a 'science vs.
religion' dichotomy. The rest of the papers in the section
illustrate the complexity of political, emotional, cultural and equity
issues--often misunderstood or misrecognised by archaeologists--that
underlie the debate.
Section three, 'Indigenous Voice and Identity', presents
case studies that not only examine the inclusion of Indigenous voices
into archaeological practice, but also the outcomes of this for both
Indigenous and archaeological agendas and aspirations. The papers here
also illustrate the complexities and nuances of identity and the
intersections of identity politics with archaeology, with examples from
Southern Africa (Ouzman), Australia (Beck et al., Hemming and Trevorrow,
Birt and Copley), and the African-American Diaspora (Mathis and Weik).
Part Four, 'The Ethics of Archaeological Practice', endeavours
to consider the consequences the insights offered in this volume have
for archaeological practice. The papers by Zimmerman and Rigney and
Worby are particularly compelling, forcing the reader to re/consider the
general frameworks of practice. Papers by Wiynjorroc et al., Jackson and
Smith, and Isaacson and Ford address the range of ethical and culturally
sensitive practices that occur in Australia, a country where Indigenous
peoples have been particularly successful in persuading archaeologists
to listen to their concerns. It emerges that working with Indigenous
communities need not be anxious or tense; on the contrary, it provides
opportunities for extending intellectual boundaries.
A number of poems and short narrative pieces by both Indigenous and
non-Indigenous authors punctuate the volume. While the fraught and
emotional content surrounding Indigenous archaeologies is often
discounted in academic and heritage policy debates, these pieces are
used to good effect here: many are written with humour or lightness of
touch, but there is no side-stepping the emotional and intellectual
engagement they demand of the reader. Importantly, they remind us that,
as with Indigenous cultural identities, archaeological disciplinary and
individual identities are tied up in these debates; it is thus not only
Indigenous peoples who have emotive responses to Indigenous archaeology.
I have used this book in both undergraduate and postgraduate
teaching. The students have found it accessible and informative, but
also challenging, as it encourages them to engage constructively with
intellectually and emotionally complex themes and issues. I highly
recommend Indigenous Archaeologies, and hope that all archaeologists
working with communities will find the time to read it.
LAURAJANE SMITH
Department of Archaeology, University of York, UK
(Email: ls18@york.ac.uk)