首页    期刊浏览 2025年05月24日 星期六
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:S. Settar & Radi Korisettar (ed.). Indian archaeology in retrospect (4 volumes).
  • 作者:Coningham, Robin
  • 期刊名称:Antiquity
  • 印刷版ISSN:0003-598X
  • 出版年度:2002
  • 期号:December
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:Cambridge University Press
  • 摘要:lxxiv+2006 pages, figures, tables. 2002. New Delhi: Manohar; 81-7304-318-3 (81-7304-319-1 [Vol. I], 81-7304-320-5 [Vol. II], 81-7304-321-3 [Vol. III], 81-7304-322-1 [Vol. IV]) hardback Rs 1250 (each vol.).

S. Settar & Radi Korisettar (ed.). Indian archaeology in retrospect (4 volumes).


Coningham, Robin


lxxiv+2006 pages, figures, tables. 2002. New Delhi: Manohar; 81-7304-318-3 (81-7304-319-1 [Vol. I], 81-7304-320-5 [Vol. II], 81-7304-321-3 [Vol. III], 81-7304-322-1 [Vol. IV]) hardback Rs 1250 (each vol.).

To commemorate the 50th anniversary of Indian Independence, the Chairman of the Indian Council of Historical Research co-ordinated a team of 62 scholars to review and present the successes of archaeology in India since the end of the British rule. The resultant work, Indian archaeology in retrospect, a collection of 59 chapters, forms one of the most valuable and current resources available to scholars and students of south Asian archaeology. The first two volumes, Prehistory and Protohistory, are arranged in a broadly chronological format, whilst volume III, Archaeology and interactive disciplines, identifies ways in which natural and biological sciences have assisted the development of Indian archaeology. Archaeology and historiography, the final volume, offers a number of reviews of Indian theoretical and methodological approaches over the last 50 years. Published under the patronage of the Indian Council of Historical Research, this is by no means a myopic collection, as indicated by contributions from Indian, American, British, German, Italian and Australian scholars. Having said that, there is considerable pleasure in noting the presence of internationally recognized Indian authorities, such as Paddayya writing on Indian theory, V.N. Misra on the Mesolithic, Purushottam Singh on the Neolithic, K. Krishnan on ceramic analysis, Nayanjot Lahiri on the work of the Archaeological Survey of India, M.K. Dhavalikar on early farming communities of central India, R. Korisettar & R. Ramesh on the palaeo-Monsoon and D.P. Agrawal on dating.

The first volume, Prehistory, contains 15 chapters covering the archaeology of India from the Lower Palaeolithic to the Iron Age. With the exception of the Harappan civilization, which is discussed in volume 2, the archaeological sequence is systematically presented in three chapters dedicated to the Palaeolithic, one to the Mesolithic, three to the Neolithic, three to the Chalcolithic and two to the Iron Age. In addition to the presence of four useful appendices, such as A list of Upper Palaeolithic sites in India, the volume concludes with three broader chapters on rock art, ceramic analysis and the study of beads. Whilst the presence of three different contributions on a single subject (such as the Neolithic) might have resulted in repetition, the editors have successfully co-ordinated the chapters so as to complement one another through the use of different focus. Purushottam Singh's contribution, for example, offers a reflective summary of the Neolithic cultures of the northern and eastern parts of south Asia, whilst Korisettar et al. concentrate on the Deccan and Dhavalikar on Central India. The majority of chapters are well organized and accessible, and summarize the history of research since Independence, present the current state of knowledge and conclude with a reflective discussion as to the remaining issues. Most contributors also demonstrate clear awareness of archaeological sites located outside India's current borders; however, the paucity of references to Sri Lanka is notable.

Volume II, Protohistory, is a collection of 14 chapters reviewing aspects of the archaeology of the Harappan civilization. Opening with a summary by Greg Possehl of the discoveries since Independence, the volume has two distinct foci of study--10 chapters dedicated to general themes with a further four chapters dedicated to the archaeology of western India. The former provide an invaluable review of the current understanding of the Harappan civilization's site locations, script and language, social organization, religion, craft and technological abilities, biological anthropology and subsistence strategies. The latter offer an alternative focus on the Harappan civilization within western India--one of the few parts of the civilization within India's political boundaries--demonstrating its links as well as its distinct differences. The volume contains a number of original syntheses and some of the demons unleashed during British rule, such as the preoccupation with the racial identity of the civilization's inhabitants, are finally banished by Ken Kennedy! More recent models for the development of the Harappan civilization are also refuted, as illustrated by Ajithprasad's reconsideration of the extent of complexity in Gujarat prior to its assimilation. On a more critical note, the chapter on social organization does not acknowledge the alternative models of Rissman (1988) and Miller (1985) and there is very puzzling disparity between the coverage of Harappan archaeobotany (73 pages) and its archaeozoology (18).

The third volume, Archaeology and interactive disciplines, identifies ways in which natural and biological sciences have assisted the development of Indian archaeology since Independence. Its 15 chapters review the contributions of pedology, quaternary palynology, biological anthropology, ethnography, ethnoarchaeology, palaeontology, archaeobotany and zoology, archaeometallurgy and chemistry. Highlights of this volume include a very useful review of palaeomonsoonal evidence by Korrisettar & Ramesh, a retrospect and prospect on the search for hominids in south Asia by Kennedy as well as a summary of the last 50 years of ethnoarchaeological studies in India. There is some disparity between linked chapters, as illustrated by a thematic approach for archaeobotany in comparison to a culture period approach for archaeozoology. The 15 chapters of the fourth and final volume are collectively titled Archaeology and historiography: history, theory and method, although the contributions on earth sciences and site formation processes might have sat more comfortably in the volume on Archaeology and interactive disciplines. The remaining 13 chapters contain reviews on a series of diverse subjects, ranging from archaeological theory and numismatics to maritime archaeological research and the application of aerial photography. Highlights include Paddaya's review of the history of archaeological theory in India and H.P. Ray's archaeology of Early Historic maritime India, whilst B.B. Lal's paper on the historicity of the Mahabharata and Ramayana only adds to the infamous discourse surrounding the 1992 destruction of Ayodhya's Babari Masjid.

In conclusion, the 59 chapters represent an invaluable resource and provide companions for the two key text books for the archaeology of this region--Allchin & Allchin (1982) and Allchin (1995). Its bibliographic references clearly supersede both texts, although its geographical coverage of South Asia is naturally less comprehensive. In 1949, Sir Mortimer Wheeler, the last British Director-General of the Archaeological Survey of India, offered a retrospect and prospect for archaeology in India after Independence--his legacy is fulfilled and these four volumes demonstrate that Indian archaeology has leapt into its next avatar.

References

ALLCHIN, B. & R. ALLCHIN. 1982. The rise of civilisation in India and Pakistan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

ALLCHIN, F.R. 1995. The archaeology of Early Historic South Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

MILLER, D. 1985. Ideology and the Harappan Civilization, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 4: 34-71.

RISSMAN, P. 1988. Public displays and private values: a guide to buried wealth in Harappan archaeology, World Archaeology 20: 209-28.
ROBIN CONINGHAM
Department of Archaeological Science
University of Bradford
R.A.E.Coningham@Bradford.ac.uk


联系我们|关于我们|网站声明
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有