Early hunter-gatherers in the Americas: perspectives from central Brazil.
Kipnis, Renato
There is a preconception among American archaeologists that the late
Pleistocene (c. 12,00010,000 b.p.) and early Holocene human occupation
of the Americas would have had highly formalized and diagnostic
technologies (Bryan 1986), as seen in bifacial fluted projectiles
(Clovis and/or Folsom points(1)) or Palaeo-arctic microblades, This bias
carries with it two presumptions which have no reason to exist:
* Clovis and related industries had to be diffused throughout the
Americas; and
* there should be a 'big-game hunting' horizon in South
America.
In short, the North American archetype is being used: if there is a
late Pleistocene human occupation in South America, then it should look
like the one in North America.
Although several archaeological sites in South America are of the
same age as Clovis and Folsom, they do not show the characteristics
typical of North American Palaeoindian occupation (Dillehay et al.
1992). Until very recently, a late Pleistocene human occupation in South
America was not accepted by mainstream North American archaeologists
(Fiedel 1996; West 1991). This can be explained by three factors:
* there was no undisputed pre-Clovis site in North America, as
there should be if there were Clovis' contemporaneous occupations
in South America and the migration went from north to south;
* the lack of discrete chronological horizon in South America,
similar to Clovis period in North America; and
* scarcity of information about South American archaeology being
done by South American archaeologists.
The recent publications of Monte Verde site reports (Dillehay 1989;
1997) and site visit by a group of archaeologists (Meltzer et al. 1997;
Pedler & Adovasio 1997) put an end to the 'pre-Clovis'
occupation debate with the indisputable evidence of human occupation in
southern Chile c. 12,500 years b.p. Along with that we hope that more
attention will be geared to other South American late Pleistocene sites,
and more importantly, to the variability of early human adaptations in
the Americas.
This article presents evidence of late Pleistocene human occupations
at several sites in the eastern tropical lowlands of South America,
specifically in central Brazil, that are not characterized by the
presence of specialized 'big-game hunting' assemblages. The
archaeological record from this region shows that until c. 3500 years
b.p. the region was occupied continuously by egalitarian foraging groups
subsisting entirely on wild animals and plants. Reviewing archaeological
evidences of this early occupation, this article suggests that
adaptation was based primarily on plants and small mammals, with an
expedient lithic assemblage geared to manufacturing wood implements.
The fact that late Pleistocene lithic assemblages from South America
are distinct from North America should not be a surprise. Clovis,
Folsom, Lindenmeier and other North American late Pleistocene and early
Holocene periods are specific adaptations to particular ecological
context and subsistence strategy. When humans migrated to South America
they encountered a very ecologically diverse land, and had to adapt and
adjust to this new environment. From an ecological point of view,
important once we deal with subsistence strategies, we are talking about
local adaptation during a period of important palaeoclimatic changes.
The variability found among human occupation in the Americas during late
Pleistocene and early Holocene periods can be partially explained by
regional adaptations of people facing environmental risk.
Theoretical framework
The human ecological approach to hunter-gatherer studies has shown
those societies use a broad range of ways to mitigate risk, including
mobility, storage, logistical collecting, exchange, communal sharing,
intensification and diversification (e.g. Colson 1979; Goland 1991;
Halstead & O'Shea 1989; Spielmann 1986; Wiessner 1982;
Winterhalder 1990). Combinations of these mechanisms have been used to
define contrasting strategies: foragers/collectors (Binford 1980),
immediate return systems/delayed return systems (Woodburn 1980), nomadic hunter-gatherers/sedentary hunter-gatherers (Testar 1982), generalized
hunter-gatherers/complex hunter-gatherers (Hayden 1990). These
strategies are culturally defined adaptive responses to specific sets of
environmental conditions, which vary both spatially and temporally in a
given environment.
Anthropologists interested in environmental adaptation have argued
that diversification (exploitation of a broader spectrum of resources)
is a particularly effective mechanism of risk management.
Diversification, together with intensification (increase in
productivity, intensification proper and specialization; Morrison 1994)
are likely adaptive responses to climatic instability in the late
Pleistocene and early Holocene in the Old and in the New Worlds: both
may have been key to the development of complex hunter-gatherer
societies (Price 1991; Price & Brown 1985), and to the origin of
agriculture (Binford 1968; Cohen 1977; Flannery 1986; Redding 1988). On
the basis of the archaeological record from central Brazil it has been
suggested that diversification and intensification were also mechanisms
employed by hunter-gatherer groups in this region during the late
Pleistocene and early Holocene, a period marked by palaeoclimatic
instability and major environmental changes (Schmitz 1981; 1987a).
Palaeo-climate
Climatic changes did not affect the whole of the central Brazil
region equally; recent palaeoclimatic studies from different areas are
producing different results. Pollen sequences from two regions in Minas
Gerais indicate an increase in seasonality with a concomitant extension
of the dry season and a reduction in winter cooling at the end of the
Pleistocene and early Holocene. Over the past 17,000 years, a rapid
succession of different forest types in the pollen record from Salitre
is interpreted as reflecting rapid climate changes (Ledru et al. 1996).
Between c. 9000 and c. 5500 b.p., climatic shifts from cold/humid to
warm/dry were observed in one pollen sequence (Ledru 1993); at 5000
years there was an arid interval. Another pollen record from Lago do
Pires, a transitional zone from cerrado to forest, recorded a moist
phase between 8810 and 7500 b.p.; at 5530 b.p. a major change in
vegetation, from cerrado to extensive forests, took place (Behling
1995). A fourth pollen record from Minas Gerais suggested a brief
cooling period at 5000 b.p. (Oliveira 1992). Another recent
palaeoclimatic study in Goias indicated an increase of precipitation c.
10,400-7700 b.p. Humidity continued to increase in the next period
(6500-3500 b.p.), with highest levels at the Climatic Optimum (Vicenti
1993). Climatic and vegetation changes in central Brazil seem to have
had local variations.
Late Pleistocene and early Holocene hunter-gatherers living in this
region had to cope with both climatic instability and local ecological
variation with inter-annual rainfall fluctuation, unpredictability, and
long-term environmental change amongst the critical variables. Rainfall
is an important environmental variable, ultimately determining the food
base for hunters (grazing animal biomass and distribution), as well as
primary productivity for gatherers (Low 1990). The variability among
late Pleistocene and early Holocene human occupation throughout the
Americas can be partially explained by regional adaptation to local
palaeoenvironmental conditions.
Archaeological record
Evidence of human occupation in central Brazil dates back to the
Pleistocene/Holocene transition, with the earliest radiocarbon date at
c. 12,000 b.p. (TABLE 1). The main archaeological sites are in the state
of Minas Gerais (several sites at Peruacu Valley and Grande Abrigo de
Santana do Riacho), Mato Grosso (Santa Elina), Pernambuco (several sites
at Sao Raimundo Nonato), and Goias (GO-JA-01) [ILLUSTRATION FOR FIGURE 1
OMITTED]. From the very limited archaeological record Schmitz (1981;
1987a) proposed three temporal divisions for the late Pleistocene/early
Holocene human occupation of Central Brazil: Beginning of Holocene
(11,000-8500 b.p.): Transitional Period (8500-6500 b.p.): and Climatic
Optimum(2) (65000-4000 b.p.).
According to Schmitz, the Beginning of the Holocene was a homogeneous
cultural horizon. Central Brazil was occupied by hunter-gatherers in
dispersed and highly mobile bands, with a subsistence pattern based on
hunting large mammals (tapir, peccaries, deer), supplemented by
anteaters, armadillos, turtles, lizards, rhea, birds and fishes (Jacobus
1983; Moreira 1983-4). Molluscs are absent, fruit seeds, especially from
palm trees, are present (Schmitz 1981; Schmitz et al. 1989).
The Transitional Period is associated with modifications in
subsistence, technology and settlement. There is archaeological evidence
that terrestrial molluscs assume an important subsistence role and that
fruits were consumed in large quantities. The increased abundance of
terrestrial molluscs in interior sites, such as the rock-shelters of
Goias and Minas Gerais, is accompanied on the coast by the first
specialized gatherers of marine and lagoon shellfish (sambaquis)
(Schmitz 1987a; 1987b). Sites are still dispersed, and there is no
significant change in their number (Schmitz 1981; Schmitz et el. 1989).
[TABULAR DATA FOR TABLE 1 OMITTED]
At the Climatic Optimum, according to Schmitz, there is increased use
of smaller vertebrates. Food remains continue to emphasize molluscs, but
in smaller quantities and consisting almost exclusively of large
gastropods. Remains of large and medium-sized vertebrates are not
numerous; small mammals predominate. Exploitation of birds appears to
have intensified. A variety of seeds and palm nuts often fill pits or
form lenses in hearths. After 5000 b.p. the number of sites increases,
suggesting significant demographic growth (Prous 1992). Rock-shelters
and caves intensively used in the previous periods are abandoned during
this period in the south of Piaui, Pernambuco, parts of Minas Gerais and
Goias (Schmitz 1981; Prous 1992).
These changes in subsistence pattern as reflected in the
archaeological record may be responses to climatic changes and their
effects on the ecosystem. It has been argued that the palaeoclimate of
central Brazil became more humid during the period between the early
Holocene and the Climatic Optimum (Ab'Saber 1981; Schmitz 1987a);
with an increase in humidity, molluscs proliferated, vegetation became
denser, and mammals became more dispersed (so terrestrial game declined
in abundance). Hunting would have been more difficult. The Climatic
Optimum saw an extraordinary expansion of vegetation: forests appeared,
parklands expanded and thorn-scrub forests were reduced. Terrestrial
game further decreased in abundance. By Schmitz's (1981; 1987a)
argument, humans responded by altering their resource base, with greater
emphasis on plants, and much less reliance on animals, particularly
large ones. The great majority of the archaeological evidence dated to
late Pleistocene and early Holocene periods is found in rock-shelters
and caves (in contrast to the open-air sites of North America). This
does not mean that people were living only in caves; a bias of survival
and discovery has to be taken into consideration, and we have to spend
some energy in searching for open-air sites. But we do have sites with
very good preservation, well-defined stratified deposits [ILLUSTRATION
FOR FIGURE 2 OMITTED], and rich sequences of remains from the
Pleistocene/Holocene transition to the 19th century.
Systematic research in central Brazil is being done in three main
areas: the regions of Rondonopolos, Mato Grosso; Cerra da Capivara,
Paiui; and Vale do Peruacu, Minas Gerais [ILLUSTRATION FOR FIGURE 1
OMITTED]. This large area of Brazil shows a clear and recurrent pattern
of sites sharing similar material culture, subsistence pattern, and a
consistent range of radiocarbon dates which is strong evidence of human
occupation in South America c. 12,000 years b.p. It also shows that,
contrary to Schmitz's generalized hunting-based economy, the early
inhabitants of this region were primarily gatherers.
Three important archaeological sites in eastern/central Brazil -
Grande Abrigo de Santana do Riacho, Lapa dos Bichos and Lapa do Boquete,
in the state of Minas Gerais - are rock-shelters presenting excellent
organic preservation, and rich stratified sequences of remains dating
from the Pleistocene/Holocene transition to the Holocene [ILLUSTRATION
FOR FIGURE 2 OMITTED].
Grande Abrigo de Santana do Riacho, a rock-shelter formed by the
falling of quartzite blocks from the base of a cliff, is an exception in
an area dominated by karstic caves and rock-shelters. Excavations
conducted in the southern part of the rock-shelter cover 100 sq. m. The
occupation dates back to 11,960 [+ or -] 250 b.p. (GIF-5089) and is
continuous up to 3990+70 b.p. (Prous 1992; 1993).
Lapa do Boquete and Lapa dos Bichos are located in the Peruacu
valley, in the northern region of Minas Gerais. The Peruacu river's
origin is located in the gneiss, 80 km northwest on the left margin of
the Sao Francisco river. Its middle course cuts through Precambrian
calcareous formations, and in the past it was almost entirely
subterranean. A roof collapse exposed the river bed, forming a canyon
with cliffs of 50-100 m, with karstic forms (lapies, dolines and
residual forms), and subterranean sections 1-3 km long (Prous 1991b).
The canyon, intensively occupied by prehistoric groups, offers material
culture, subsistence remains, burials and numerous cave paintings and
engravings. Lapa do Boquete and Lapa dos Bichos are two of more than 60
known sites in the canyon where systematic excavations have been carried
out in just a small part.
These three sites are important to understanding the Postglacial period in eastern central Brazil: all three have excellent organic
preservation including rich botanical and animal remains, perishable
wooden and reed artefacts, and human burials. Several occupation levels
span most of the Postglacial period. In the first archaeological level
at Lapa do Boquete (12,000[+ or -]170 years b.p., CTDN-2403) and at Lapa
dos Bichos (10,450[+ or -]70 years b.p., BETA-100397) a lithic industry
has flint and silicified sandstone artefacts and the by-products of
their manufacture, characterized by end-scrapers and rare bifacial
projectile points. Microscopic use-wear analysis shows that many
implements have been used; most of the wear is associated with
woodworking (Prous et al. 1992).
At Santana do Riacho the lithic industry, mainly on quartz and
quartzite, has side-scrapers, end-scrapers, borers and rare bifacial
projectile points (Prous 1991). Use-wear studied in a sample of the
Santana do Riacho lithic collection also showed general evidence of
woodworking (Alonso 1991).
Although there may be local variation in the lithic industries of
central Brazil, the industries from Minas Gerais resemble those from
other parts of this region: an expedient lithic assemblage, with not
many multifunctional tools, many scrapers, very rare bifacial points,
and few highly curated tools [ILLUSTRATION FOR FIGURE 3 OMITTED]. It
presents not only clearly morphological patterning (limaces) but other
indicators of human modification: cores, flakes and conjoining flakes.
Other important characteristics which attest to a human presence are the
artefacts and flakes made of exotic raw material, the presence of burned
lithic material in areas where natural fire could not have occurred
(caves) and the use-wear already mentioned.
We know very little about botanical remains in central Brazil despite
very good preservation at Santana do Riacho and sites in the Peruacu
Valley. The general picture shows the exploitation of wild fruits
(coquinhos, guariroba, licuri, chicha, pequi, jatoba, and other cerrado
fruits). This exploitation does not stop with the advent of corn and
manioc agriculture (Veloso & Resende 1992). Although subsistence
shows spatial and temporal variation throughout the post-Pleistocene
period in central Brazil, it is characterized by a broad-spectrum diet
based on gathered fruits and roots.
There are a few faunal case-studies. Faunal remains from Peruacu
Valley sites and Santana do Riacho are currently being analysed (by the
author). The pattern becoming clear is of small and medium-sized animals
predominating in the archaeological record from central Brazil. The
majority are mammals (rodents, armadillos, primates, sloths, Brazilian
rabbits, anteaters), with some reptiles, birds and fishes. Bigger
animals (deer, peccaries, tapir), rare to start with, are more
represented in later occupations. The working hypothesis is that, with
the advent of agriculture, people who had minimized the risk of
subsistence stress were taking more 'chances' in hunting
bigger animals. There is no clear evidence of late Pleistocene people
hunting extinct 'mega-fauna'.
The appearance of domesticated plants in the archaeological record of
central Brazil is not well dated. The appearance of ceramic in the
archaeological sequence of rock-shelter sites in central Brazil is
usually interpreted as evidence of the first horticultural groups, and
is known as the Una tradition. Sometimes the pottery is associated with
domesticated plants (i.e. corn and manioc). The earliest evidence for
the Una tradition in central Brazil dates to 3490 b.p. (Prous 1992).
This tradition is defined by the presence of a few ceramic vessels
(small and undecorated) and almost exclusive to rock-shelters. Although
a survey and/or preservation bias might explain the lack of open-air
sites, another plausible explanation is that this is evidence of
mutualistic interaction between hunter-gatherers and horticulturalists.
The fact that the lithic industry from the Una tradition is not
different from the previous occupations (Prous 1992; Schmitz et al.
1989) might be an indicator the latter explanation is correct. If this
is the case, the increase of large mammal hunting could be associated
with the hunter-gatherer/horticulturalist interaction, where meat was
exchanged for domesticated plants, as seen for example between the Maki
and Tukano societies from northwest Amazonia (Silverwood-Cope 1990).
Some characteristics of the fauna from those sites are also strong
evidence of a human presence during the late Pleistocene period. There
are fish remains in all levels in sites that are and were more than 50 m
above the river. Although rare, other non-karstic animals - peccaries -
are present. Burned (calcined) bones, broken bones that refit, and
cut-marks are also evidence of human occupation of these habitats as
early as 12,000 years ago.
Other important features in sites from central Brazil are
well-structured hearths, and burials. At Santana do Riacho, 24 burials
were found containing approximately 40 individuals; one burial (Sep.
XII) dates to 9460[+ or -]110 b.p. (GIF-4508) (Prous 1992; 1993). This
collection is currently being reanalysed; preliminary results show a
high incidence of caries among the population from Santana do Riacho in
all archaeological levels(3) (Neves et al. 1996), an indication of a
diet rich in carbohydrates (Saunders & Katzeberg 1992).
The slight available data shows pattern. There is strong evidence for
a late Pleistocene human occupation in eastern South America. The
diverse lithic assemblages dating from c. 12,000 years b.p. are
unequivocally human made; they are distinct from the North American
industries of Clovis and Folsom. Wood-working tools might have been
important. The subsistence of early groups in central Brazil was based
on a foraging strategy, focusing on the exploitation of wild plants and
small animals; preliminary work based on faunal and osteological
analysis supports the hypothesis that plants were the staple diet.
That subsistence pattern is similar to the one reported by Gnecco
(1997) and Roosevelt et al. (1996) for late Pleistocene/early Holocene
hunter-gatherer occupation in the Amazon region, where subsistence
strategy relied more on gathering than hunting - a pattern again very
different from the North American, where 'big-game hunting'
was important. It differs from Schmitz's (1987a) model for central
Brazil, where the first people had a strategy geared to large mammals
(deer, peccaries, tapir etc.), and later shifted to a plant-based
subsistence.
Discussion
In sum, early human occupation of eastern South America is
characterized by generalized foragers, very different from the
'big-game' hunters in North America. Plant resources, both as
food and as raw material for tool manufacture, were very important. A
clearly diverse lithic assemblage is not geared towards hunting
activity. I suggest we put an end to the 'spear/projectile point
tyranny', and begin to look at cultural dynamics instead. The
documented variability in the archaeological record can be partially
explained by adaptation to the tropical region, with great dependence on
plant foods.
Major changes in technology and subsistence pattern in central Brazil
occurred around the mid Holocene, similar to Australia (Edwards &
O'Connell 1995) than to other regions of the world. The general
approach to stone technology in Australia and eastern South America
share similar general features - small tools, many scrapers, and rare
projectile points; and extinct megafauna seem to have been hunted
neither in Australia nor in South America.
Schmitz's (1987a) model for late Pleistocene and early Holocene
adaptations is an attempt to correlate environmental and behavioural
changes in central Brazil that 'mimic' processes that occurred
in the Old World and North America. The archaeological record from
central Brazil discussed above does not support the behavioural changes
suggested, despite similar environmental changes. Although not common,
and often not explicit, traditionally the Old World (Upper Palaeolithic
and Mesolithic) and North America (Palaeoindian and Archaic) are used as
models for comparison and frameworks to interpret early human occupation
in Brazil. It is time we began to broaden our view and knowledge, and
look at other places as well, specifically Australia.
To understand the specific developments and organization of late
Pleistocene and early Holocene hunter-gatherers in central Brazil, we
clearly need more detailed archaeological and palaeoenvironmental data.
So far, description and explanation of the archaeological record has
been based on qualitative and incomplete archaeological data, biased
survey methods and very general palaeoclimatic reconstruction. With more
germane studies on cultural dynamics of human migration and adaptation,
a different pattern of Pleistocene and early post-glacial adaptation
will emerge, which should change the traditional view of the First
Americans.
1 Northern Palaeoindian cultures appear to begin with Clovis and
Folsom, dated c. 11,200-10,900 and c. 10,90010,200 years b.p.
respectively, and end in the early Holocene at c. 8500 years b.p.
(Taylor et al. 1996; Roosevelt et al. 1996).
2 Mid-Holocene interval of warm climate between 7000 and 4000 b.p.
(Ab'Saber 1981; Smitz 1981).
3 9.0% of permanent teeth have caries; and if we take only adults,
this number goes to 11.0%.
References
AB'SABER, A.N. 1981 Paleo-clima e paleo-ecologia, Anuario de
Divulgacao Cientifica 5:33-51
ADOVASIO, J.M. & D.R. PEDLER. 1997. Monte Verde and the antiquity
of humankind in the Americas, Antiquity 71: 57380.
ALONSO, M. 1991a. Industria litica de Santana do Riacho: analise
funcional de microtraceologia, Arquivos do Museu de Historia Natural 12:
275-84.
BINFORD, L.R. 1968. Post-Pleistocene adaptations, in S.R. Binford
& L.R. Binford (ed.), New perspectives in archaeology: 237-34.
Chicago: Aldine.
1980. Willow smoke and dog's tails: hunter-gatherer settlement
systems and archaeological site formation, American Antiquity 45(1):
4-20.
BRYAN, A. 1986. Paleoamerican prehistory as seen from South America,
in A. Bryan (ed.), New evidence for the Pleistocene peopling of the
Americas: 1-14. Orono (ME): Center for the Study of Early Man,
University of Maine.
CASHDAN, E. (ed.). 1990. Risk and uncertainty in tribal and peasant
economies. Boulder (CO): Westview.
COLSON, E. 1979. In good years and in bad: food strategies of
self-reliant societies, Journal of Anthropological Research 35(1):
18-29.
COHEN, M.N. 1977. The world food crisis in prehistory. New Haven (CT): Yale University Press.
DILLEHAY, T.D. 1989. Monte Verde: a Late Pleistocene settlement in
Chile 1: Paleoenvironment and site context. Washington (DC): Smithsonion
Institution Press.
1997. Monte Verde: a Late Pleistocene settlement in Chile 2: The
archaeological context. Washington (DC): Smithsonion Institution Press.
DILLEHAY, T.D., G,A. CALDERON, G. POLITIS, & M. DA CONCEICAO DE
M.C. BELTRAO. 1992. Earliest hunter-gatherers of South America, Journal
of World Prehistory 6(2): 145-204.
EDWARDS, D.A. & J.F. O'CONNELL. 1995. Broad spectrum diets
in arid Australia. Antiquity 69: 769-83.
FIEDEL, S. 1996. Paleoindians in the Brazilian Amazon, Science 274:
1823-4.
FLANNERY, K.V. (ed.). 1986. Guild Naquitz: archaic foraging and early
agriculture in Oaxaca, Mexico. New York (NY): Academic Press.
GNECCO, C. & S. MORA. 1997. Late Pleistocene/early Holocene
tropical forest occupations at San Insidro and Pena Roja, Colombia,
Antiquity 71: 683-90.
GOLAND, C. 1991. Cultivating diversity:field scattering as ag.
ricultural risk management in Cuyo, Cuyo, Dept. of Puno, Peru. Ann Arbor
(MI): University of Michigan.
HALSTEAD, P. & J, O'SHEA (ed.). 1989. Bad year economics:
cultural responses to risk and uncertainty. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
HAYDEN, B. 1990, Nimrods, piscators, pluckers and planters: the
emergence of food production, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology
9(1):31-69.
JACOBUS, A.L. 1983. Restos alimentares do sitio GO-JA-01,
Serranopolois, Goias; Nota Previa. Sao Leopoldo: Institute Anchietano de
Pesquisas.
LEDRU, M-P. 1993. Late Quaternary environmental and climatic changes
in central Brazil, Quaternary Research 39: 90-98.
LEDRU, M-P., P.I.S. BRAGA, F. SOUBIES, M. FOURNIER, L. MARTIN, K.
SUGUIO & B. TURCQ. 1996. The last 50,000 years in the Neotropics
(southern Brazil) evolution of vegetation and climate, Palaeogeography,
Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 123: 239-57.
LOW, B.S. 1990. Human responses to environmental extremeness and
uncertainty: a cross-cultural perspective, in Cashdan (ed.): 229-55.
MOREIRA, L.E. 1983/4, Cacadores: dieta e alimentacao, Arquivos do
Museu de Historia natural 8/9: 35-54.
MORRISON, K.D. 1994. The intensification of production:
archaeological approaches, Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory
2(1): 111-60.
NEVES, W. S. CORNERO & A. PROUS. 1996. Incidencia de caries na
populacao do Santana do Riacho e o mite do Paleo-Indio Cacador. IV
Congresso de La Asociacion Latino Americana de Antropologia Biologica,
Buenos Aires: Asociacion Latino Americana de Antropologia Biologica.
OLIVEIRA, P.E. 1992. A palynological record of Late Quaternary
vegetation and climatic change in southeast Brazil. Ph.D dissertation,
Ohio State University.
PRICE, T.D. (ed.) 1989. The chemistry of prehistoric human bone.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
1991. The view from Europe: concepts and questions about terminal
Pleistocene societies, in T. Dillehay & D.]. Meltzer (ed.), The
first Americans: search and research: 185-208. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press.
PRICE, T.D. & L.A. BROWN. 1985. Prehistoric hunter-gatherers. New
York (NY): Academic Press.
PROUS, A. 1991a. Santana do Riacho - Tome I, Arquivos do Museu de
Historia Natural 12; 3-384.
1991b. Fouilles de L'Abri du Boquete, Minas Gerais, Bresil,
Journal de la Societe des Americanistes 77: 77-109.
1992. Arqueologia Brasiliera. Brasilia: Editora UnB.
1992-3. Santana do Riacho - Tome II, Arquivos do Museu de Historia
Natural 13/14: 3-420.
PROUS, A., M.A. LIMA, E. FOGACA & M.E. BRITTO. 1992. A industrial
litica da camada VIII da Lapa do Boquete, Vale do Rio Peruacu, MG
(Brasil), in Annais do 3 [degrees] Congresso da Associacao Brasileira de
Estudos do Quaternario: 342-62. Belo Horizonte: Associacao Brasileira de
Estudos do Quaternario.
REDDING, R.W. 1998. A general explanation of subsistence change: from
hunting and gathering to food production, Journal of Anthropological
Archaeology 7: 56-97.
ROOSEVELT, A.C. et al. 1996. Paleoindian cave dwellers in the Amazon:
the peopling of the Americas, Science 272:373-84.
SAUNDERS, S.R. & M. A. KATZENBERG (ed,). 1992. Skeletal biology
of past peoples: research methods. New York (NY): Wiley-Liss.
SCHMITZ, P.I. 1951. La evolucion de la culture en el centre y
nordeste de Brasil en 14,000 y 4000 aries antes del presente, Pesquisas
(serie antropologia) 32: 7-39.
1987a. Prehistoric hunters and gatherers of Brazil, Journal of World
Prehistory 1(1): 53-125.
1987b. Cacadores antigos no sudoeste de Goias, Brasil, Estudos
Atacamenos 8: 16-35.
SCHMITZ, P.I., A.S. BARBOSA, A.L. JACOBUS & M.B. RIBEIRO. 1989.
Arqueologia nos Cerrados do Brasil Central, Serranopolos, Pesquisas
(serie antropologia) 44.
SILVERWOOD-COPE, P.L. 1990. Os Maku: Povo cacador do noroeste da
Amazonia. Brasilia: Editora Universidade de Brasilia.
SPIELMANN, K. 1986. Interdependence among egalitarian societies,
Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 5:279-312.
TAYLOR, R.E., C.V. HAYNES, JR & M. STUIVER. 1996. Clovis and
Folsom age estimates: stratigraphic context and radiocarbon calibration,
Antiquity 70: 515-25.
TESTAR, A. 1982. The significance of food storage among
hunter-gatherers: residence patters, population densities, and social
inequalities, Current Anthropology 23: 523-30.
VELOSO, T.P.G. & E.M.T.P. BE RESENDE. 1992. Vestigios alimentares
nos sitios arqueologicos sob abrigos de Minas Gerais, Annais do 3
[degrees] Congresso da Associacao Brasileira de Estudos do Quaternario:
389-414. Role Horizonte: Associacao Brasileira de Estudos do
Quaternario.
VICENTINI, K.R.C.F. 1993. Analise Palinologica de urea Vereda em
Crominia - GO. MA dissertation, University of Brasilia.
WEST, F.H. 1991. Archaeology in the press: science misserved?, Review
of Archaeology 11(2): 25-32.
WIESSNER, P. 1982. Risk, reciprocity and social influences on Kung
San Economics, in E. Leacock & R. Lee (ed.), Politics and history in
band societies: 61-84. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
WILLEY, G.R. & J.A. SABLOFF. 1980. A history of American
archaeology. 2nd edition. San Francisco (CA): W.H. Freeman.
WINTERHALDER, B. 1990. Open field, common pot: harvest variability
and risk avoidance in agricultural and foraging societies, in Cashdan
(ed.): 67-88.
WOODBURN, B. 1990. Hunters and gatherers today and reconstruction of
the past, in E. Gellner (ed.). Soviet and western anthropology: 95-117.
London: Duckworth.