Mending fences: warmer US-Canadian relations.
Hemel, Daniel
Not since US President James Polk threatened to invade British
Columbia in 1845 have tempers flared so hotly along the US-Canadian
border. In March 2003, Carolyn Parish, a member of Parliament from
Canada's ruling Liberal Party, publicly exclaimed: "Damn
Americans, I hate those bastards." Parish's remarks came less
than five months after Francoise Ducros, a spokesperson for Prime
Minister Jean Chretien, described US President George Bush as a
"moron" while speaking within earshot of reporters at the NATO
summit in Prague.
These political insults underscore more substantive disputes
between the two neighbors. In April 2002, a US F-16 fighter pilot fired
a laser-guided missile into a Canadian training area south of Kandahar,
Afghanistan, killing four Canadian soldiers and wounding eight others.
The same spring, the United States imposed a 27 percent tariff on
softwood lumber imports from Canada to combat dumping of subsidized
Canadian surplus lumber. In March 2003, the US Congress cut funding for
a four-year-old joint US-Canadian effort to monitor Pacific Ocean salmon
stocks. In May 2003, the US government barred importation of Canadian
beef, fearing the spread of mad cow disease from Canada, and halting
what had been a US$1.2 billion per year trade. President Bush's
rejection of the Kyoto Protocol and Prime Minister Chretien's
criticism of the US intervention in Iraq have only deepened the rift.
Now, with former Finance Minister Paul Martin likely succeeding the
retiring Chretien as prime minister in February 2004, senior officials
in the Bush administration, including Undersecretary of State for
Western Hemispheric Affairs Roger Noriega and US Ambassador to Canada
Paul Cellucci, have indicated that they expect a reconciliation between
Washington and Ottawa. Martin, a successful steamship tycoon with an
estimated personal fortune of US$475 million, has amassed widespread
support within the Liberal Party; despite being far more conservative on
economic issues than the Liberal rank-and-file. Martin's political
ascension has been fueled largely by his reputation as a pragmatist and
a consensus-builder. As such, Martin--once he becomes prime minister--is
likely to mend mangled US-Canadian ties.
Martin has already committed to a series of measures that will
strengthen the US-Canadian relationship. He has advocated Canadian
assistance to the US-led construction of a space-based missile defense
shield. Both he and Chretien hope that the project will operate through
the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD), a joint
US-Canadian alliance. Negotiations between the two countries have
reportedly stalled, with Washington opting to wait until Martin's
inauguration before further pursuing the initiative. Meanwhile, thee
shield's proponents have asserted their power in Parliament,
passing a resolution advocating any system developed to defend America
against ballistic missiles by a 156 to 73 margin in June 2003. Once
Martin assumes control, increased cooperation between the two countries
in the military sphere could bridge the US-Canadian rift.
Second, Martin's vow to augment Canadian military outlays
should allay US criticism of Ottawa's meager nine billion US
dollar-defense budget. Canada's appropriations for its armed forces
amounted to only 1.1 percent of its gross domestic product in 2002--less
than every other NATO country, except for Luxembourg and Iceland. With
1,900 Canadian troops deployed in Afghanistan and an additional 1,200 in
the Balkans, Canada's armed forces are already stretched thin.
Martin wants to enhance Canada's on-the-ground capabilities, which
potentially could alleviate the peacekeeping burden on US troops abroad.
Such development would undoubtedly elicit gratitude and perhaps even
crucial concessions from officials in Washington.
Third, Martin has promised to form a cabinet committee, chaired by
the prime minister, to develop a strategic approach to US-Canadian
relations. Martin's proposal recognizes that US-Canadian relations
cannot be managed by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs alone, because
domestic decisions regarding issues such as gay marriage and
decriminalization of marijuana will further impact ties between the two
states. The last prime minister to personally monitor day-to-day affairs
with Washington was Brian Mulroney, and his tenure from 1984 to 1993 saw
the most cordial relationship between the United States and Canada in
history, resulting in the formation of North American Free Trade
Association. Simultaneously, Martin must navigate the tricky political
currents of Parliament. Martin can pass measures to boost defense
spending and engender rapprochement with the United States by relying on
votes from the right-of-center Canadian Alliance as well as the
Progressive Conservative faction. But he must recognize that many in his
own Liberal Party harbor ill feeling for the Bush administration and
will look sourly on conciliatory Canadian policies. Anti-US sentiment
also appears to be rampant among the electorate. A January 2003 poll
conducted by Ipsos-Reid indicated that 36 percent of Canadians view the
United States as the biggest menace to world peace, compared to 40
percent for Al Qaeda, 17 percent for Iraq, and 14 percent far North
Korea.
Recent signals from Washington indicate that the United States may
be ready for compromise. In early August 2003, US Secretary of
Agriculture Ann Veneman partially lifted the ban on Canadian beef,
permitting meat from cows younger than 30 months to enter the United
States, but kept the border closed to Canadian livestock. Meanwhile,
pressure is mounting inside Canada for an end to the detrimental rift.
Business leaders fear that anti US sentiment will damage the Canadian
economy.
Provincial premiers, including Lorne Calvert of Saskatchewan, Ralph
Klein of Alberta, and Ernie Eves of Ontario, are taking matters into
their own hands, and arranging personal meetings with US officials to
press the case for greater access to US markets. According to a survey
conducted in March 2003 on behalf of the Association for Canadian
Studies, 52 percent of Canadians identified rising anti-US sentiment in
their own country as a cause for concern. Thus a host of difficult
issues divide the United States and Canada. Although the task of
reconciliation is still a tall order, Martin's natural talent for
consensus-building could pave the way for a better US-Canadian
relationship.