首页    期刊浏览 2025年07月16日 星期三
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Linking of proceedings.
  • 作者:Harris, Alexandra Conroy
  • 期刊名称:Adoption & Fostering
  • 印刷版ISSN:0308-5759
  • 出版年度:2012
  • 期号:June
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:Sage Publications, Inc.
  • 摘要:Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Thorpe & Etherton LLJ & Ryder J
  • 关键词:Adoption;Child custody;Custody of children

Linking of proceedings.


Harris, Alexandra Conroy



E (A Child) [2012]

Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Thorpe & Etherton LLJ & Ryder J

15 March 2012 [2012] EWCA Civ 537

The mother of LM suffered from a borderline personality disorder that had led to her first three children being removed from her care and placed for adoption. The evidence showed that she had a very real possibility of being able to care for LM as a result of a new and supportive relationship she had formed with T. T had two children who were the subject of joint residence orders but were living with their mother. There were difficulties in her care of those girls and T removed them from their mother's care and placed them with his mother. The same judge was seized of the private law proceedings concerning T's daughters and the care proceedings in relation to LM. When she became aware of the developments in T's family she listed directions hearings for both cases on the same day. The judge refused to endorse a consent order that left T's daughters with their grandparents pending a section 37 report; she had made a joint residence order on the understanding that if placement with the mother broke down, T would take over care of his children. The inevitable result of the children living with T was that he was unable to provide support to LM's rehabilitation with her mother. The mother argued that the cases should be consolidated and the prospect of LM's return to her mother be taken into account when making decisions about T's children.

Held

The judge was fully aware of the circumstances of T's daughters and had made an order which provided for their placement if their mother proved unable to offer them suitable care. T was put in a position where he had to choose between his commitment to his children and to LM's rehabilitation. The judge was entitled to question whether he had given his children appropriate priority and it was notable that there was no appeal against her decision in the private law proceedings. The judge had given complete and clear explanation of her reasons for her decision and could not be criticised.

Alexandra Conroy Harris, BAAF's Legal Consultant, prepared these notes
联系我们|关于我们|网站声明
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有