The Politics of CANDU Exports.
Quigley, Kevin
The Politics of CANDU Exports By DUANE BRATT. Toronto: University
of Toronto Press, 2006. Pp. xv, 319, bibliographical references, index.
"Nuclear" is making a come-back. Organizations
representing the nuclear industry in the U.S. have been running a
regular stream of ads on American television expounding nuclear
power's benefits as an energy source: sustainable, domestic and
clean; the things that oil is not. The U.K. government has approved a
new generation of power stations, the first ones to be built in the U.K.
in decades. Many argue that Kyoto targets cannot be met without
increased use of nuclear power. Even some in the environmental movement,
once strong adversaries of nuclear technology, are having a second look.
The news has not all been positive; nuclear power has also received
attention lately for the evil it can do: Iraq, Iran and North Korea--all
examples of countries whose governments are or were alleged to have
covert operations to produce nuclear weapons. Indeed, some of the most
significant international events of the last decade have revolved around
these allegations and what Western governments were or were not prepared
to do to respond to the possibility of unstable or hostile states
developing nuclear capabilities for (potentially) military purposes.
Duane Bratt's new book on the Canada Deuterium Uranium (CANDU)
nuclear power reactor is therefore timely. Bratt is clear from the
outset that CANDU exports have always represented a fine balance of
several competing interests. As he charts the reactor's history, he
describes a complex dynamic, which involves senior politicians and
bureaucrats--in Canada and abroad--top scientists and numerous
lobbyists, both benign and corrupt.
Bratt notes that supporters of sales of CANDU reactors abroad base
their arguments on either economics or politics. Those who base their
arguments on economic claims point to the considerable financial
dividends that Canada reaps from the sale of CANDUs, including a
multibillion dollar contribution to GDP. Specifically, Bratt foregrounds
the jobs that are created as a result of the CANDU, particularly in
research and development, and the capacity to use CANDU sales to promote
Canadian businesses more generally, which helps them expand into new and
emerging markets, such as China. Maintaining a nuclear capability in
Canada is also very expensive, and therefore sales of CANDUs abroad can
generate needed sources of income. This makes the industry viable in
Canada and in so doing helps to support a sustainable energy source for
domestic use. Those who advocate CANDU sales abroad on political grounds
have done so by pointing out that the CANDU can help to raise the
standard of living in the developing world and by arguing that by
spreading the benefits of nuclear technology, particularly to the
developing world, Western countries can help to contain communism. Not
surprisingly, this latter argument carried particular weight during the
Cold War years.
Equally, over the years, the enthusiasm for selling CANDU reactors
has been constrained by numerous concerns. Nuclear non-proliferation is
chief among them, but there are others, including the concern over
selling reactors to governments with poor human rights records and weak
environmental standards, for instance. There are also those who argue
that CANDU exports are not the boon that the Canadian nuclear industry
contends. In fact, there are various direct and indirect subsidies that
Canadian taxpayers have to absorb almost every time a CANDU reactor is
sold.
With every sale--or potential sale--of a CANDU reactor, there is a
clash of some variation of these for and against arguments. Bratt notes
bouts of "schizophrenia" as the Canadian government talks a
good game about human rights, for instance, and then succumbs to the
favourable economic considerations of CANDU sales and agrees not only to
sell but to promote actively the CANDU to foreign governments,
irrespective of their record on human rights.
Drawing from political science literature and in particular
Cranford Pratt's dominant class theory, Bratt argues that the
largely pro-nuclear lobbyists, such as the Canadian Nuclear Association and Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd., dominate policy discussions. They are
an elite class, with an unrivalled knowledge of the science and have
privileged access to decision-makers. This dynamic is reinforced by the
fact that the elite groups at work within key government agencies--at
Natural Resources Canada, the Department of Foreign Affairs and
International Trade, and the Canadian Nuclear Safety
Commission--understand the arguments largely in the terms in which the
pro-nuclear lobbyists pitch them. Ultimately, the economic arguments
almost always trump all other arguments, including those put forward by
the antinuclear lobby, which does not have the access or expertise to
compete with the "insider" pro-nuclear lobby. There have been
a few exceptions, such as the tightening of sanctions in the 1970s,
which followed the (arguably) clandestine use by the Indian government
of Canadian technology to carry out nuclear explosions. Bratt explains
the exceptions by drawing on Pratt, who argues, "When there are
strategic conjunctures of circumstances that open decision-making up to
a wider range of options, the efforts of ethically motivated
citizens' organizations can make important contributions to shaping
foreign policy" (p. 234).
The book is largely successful. It offers an extremely
well-documented history of the CANDU reactor generally. This in itself
is significant. For security reasons, information about nuclear reactors
is hard to come by, and Bratt should be commended for his considerable
effort. His level of detail is particularly engaging when he revisits
the arguments between Canada and India following India's nuclear
tests. Here is a lucid reminder that the Nuclear Non-Proliferation
Treaty divides the world into two groups, those who have the right to
nuclear arms and those who do not, and that not every country agrees
with this obviously discriminatory approach.
Bratt is also careful to place Canada's role in global nuclear
debates in its appropriate context. He is clear that Canada has never
been a major player in the nuclear world; if it had nuclear capabilities
at all, this was due largely to its ready access to uranium, which
provided privileged access to elite international political discussions
otherwise beyond Canada's reach.
Finally, the author keeps a number of explanatory variables in play
as he examines what factors drive CANDU sales abroad. His last chapter
provides a helpful summary of the dominant variable for each
negotiation, be it economics, human rights or non-proliferation.
The book's strength--its explicit and detailed account of the
political dynamics largely within Canada that influence the sale of
CANDUs abroad--makes the study a little narrow at times. The author
hardly refers to some of the largely American psychology literature that
has made important contributions to the study of nuclear power, such as
the psychometrics literature, which examines why people
"dread" nuclear technology. Nor does he refer to the
"normal accidents" and "high reliability
organizations" literature concerning the reliability and security
of these complex systems. He refers only in passing to the
"dread" factor and does not touch on the sociology literature
at all. As noted, the book is clearly situated within the political
science tradition, and this can explain the absence of these other
references. Nevertheless, pointing to these other studies might have
been appropriate, or least would have enriched the list of references
for further reading.
More importantly, the book's virtual silence on some of the
events and issues that have emerged in recent years, and particularly
since 9/11 and the conflict in Iraq, is surprising. Strangely, there is
little explicit mention of these events in the chapter that details the
1997-2005 period or in the concluding chapter. These events could
provide the author with the opportunity to test further some of his
principal arguments. If senior officials were influenced by the
post-9/11 context--and it is unfathomable to think that they were
not--then CANDU sales were not necessarily constrained by the
"efforts of ethically motivated citizens' organizations"
or the superior expert knowledge of insider lobbyists but rather another
force, such as the influence of U.S. foreign policy in Canada.
While explicit references in the book to U.S.-Canada relations are
modest in number, particularly in the later chapters, it seems that the
Canadian government's positions have rarely run afoul of the
relevant foreign policy objectives of the State Department. There may
not have been sales of reactors in the mid- to late 1980s, but the U.S.
government was deeply engaged in discussions with the Soviet Union about
nuclear disarmament; Canada may have been selling CANDUs to China in the
1990s, with little concern for China's human rights records but the
U.S. government was also overlooking human rights abuses in order to
encourage trade with the Chinese and penetrate China's market.
It certainly seems plausible, for instance, that 9/11, the search
for weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and indeed the pursuit of WMDs
by relatively new non-nation state groups had (and have) a profound
impact on the thinking and actions of the relevant Canadian senior civil
servants and politicians. Unfortunately, the author does not really
explore this aspect in any detail. The author notes that most of the
research for the book was carried out during the late 1990s. Certainly
the rich detail that he provides in the first part of the chronology is
not matched by his examination of the post-9/11 setting. If the research
essentially stopped at the end of the 1990s, perhaps the author's
account should also have ended there.
Kevin Quigley is assistant professor in the School of Public
Administration at Dalhousie University.