Information needs of faculty members and research scholars of Chaudhary Charan Singh university: a case study.
Kumar, Devendra
Introduction
The benefits of information revolution are centered on the
convenience of the user. Faculty members and research scholars are
responsible for teaching and are expected to do research and publish the
results throughout their careers. This study looks at the information
needs and use patterns of faculty members and research scholars of
Chaudhary Charan Singh University. A questionnaire was used to collect
data and statistical tests were applied to the results.
Significance of the Study
This study raises awareness of the collections and services of the
library, and shows the effectiveness of resources and services of
college libraries and the university library of Chaudhary Charan Singh
University. It focuses on the skills needed to use electronic resources
and emphasises the need for user education and training in using
electronic sources in the library based on user responses.
Objectives of the Study
* To study the information needs and use patterns of faculty
members and research scholars of Chaudhary Charan Singh University.
* To identify the constraints faced in using and searching for
information in libraries.
* To suggest remedies that may help the faculty members and
research scholars to use the library in an efficient way.
Scope
The present study is confined to the teachers and research scholars
working in departments colleges and departments affiliated to Chaudhary
Charan Singh University. The university includes six districts:
Bulandshahar, Meerut, Muzaffar Nagar, Saharanpur, Baghpat and Ghaziabad College.
Hypothesis
* The faculty members and research scholars of Chaudhary Charan
Singh University visit libraries for study and research purposes.
* Users face difficulties accessing information through electronic
sources.
* Users need more skill in using the electronic information
sources.
Method
A random sampling technique was used to select from 63 colleges and
27 departments based on five faculties affiliated to the university. A
total of 425 questionnaires were distributed and 200 were completed. In
addition to a questionnaire, interview and observation were also used.
Data Analysis
The data collected through the questionnaire was analysed using
FoxPro database management system software. Statistical analysis of the
data for the present study was done by applying
1. Simple percentage
2. Chi-square test
Chi-square was used to compare an observed group of frequencies
with an expected group of frequencies. This allowed expected frequencies
to be deduced from the null hypothesis.
[X.sup.2] = [(Fo - Fe).sup.2]
Fe
This is the required [X.sup.2] Value
Fo = Observed frequency
Fe = Expected frequency
df = (r-1) x (c-1) or df = (r-1)
df = Degree of freedom
r = number of rows
c = number of columns
Analysis of Data
Purpose of Visit to the Library
Frequency does not indicate the nature and purpose of library
visits. With this in mind, visitors were asked to indicate the purpose
of their visit to the library.
Nearly all users visit the library to borrow books, while
four-fifths go to locate information in books and journals and for study
and research, while a little more than half go to spend leisure time.
Information Sources for Research and Teaching Needs
Table 2 reveals that users prefer "other" sources,
followed by discussion with colleagues, attending conferences, CD-ROM
databases, and patents for research.
Figures in square brackets indicate the expected frequency (Fe) and
those in parentheses indicate the cell Chi-square
Chi-Square 1544.997
Chi-Square at 119 df and 0.05 level of significance is 155.595
Null Hypothesis Rejected
Current Literature in the Field of Interest
It is essential that for researchers to be up-to-date in their
fields of interest. In addition, they must know about developments in
other broader and peripheral areas.
Table 3 reveals that respondents find current literature in
e-journals, followed by the Internet.
Figures in square brackets indicate the expected frequency (Fe) and
those in parentheses indicate the cell Chi-square.
Chi-square =592.983
Chi-square at 56df & 0.05 level of significance is 74.451
Null Hypothesis Rejected
Difficulties Accessing Information
Faculty and researchers needs the assistance of others to access
information. Difficulties faced include lack of time, inaccessibility,
incomplete collections, lack of knowledge of sources and library
services, as well as "unfriendly library staff."
Table 4 shows faculty members and research scholars face
difficulties in accessing information because of multiple factors.
Three-quarters of respondents have difficulty because of lack of
knowledge about using library services, while two-thirds lack knowledge
of information sources.
Conclusion and Recommendations
Information Needs
Most users visit the library to borrow books, study and do
research, locate information from books and journals, and do light
reading. The purpose of visits depends on time available and the need to
keep up-to-date.
Use Patterns
Library use patterns are an effective method of understanding
information requirements. Most users gave priority to book trade
catalogues, bibliographies, indexes and abstracts, addition lists, and
book reviews for being aware of the current literature. The lower
ranking given to the Internet, e-journals, and CD-ROMs is due to the
lack of availability and skill to use them, although they do use seminar
papers, projects from colleagues, contact with original authorities,
Information/Documentation centres, and the Internet. Respondents like to
visit other libraries as well, and suggested networking among local,
university, state, public, subject, national, and government libraries.
Constraints
Every user faces constraints. Faculty members and research scholars
face difficulties in access because of multiple factors. Most face a
considerable problem of time to read or look for information in the
library. They also face problem of lack of library automation.
Automation is a key factor in improving library services for
researchers. Faculty and researchers are not familiar with appropriate
sources, and they need skill maintenance activities to update their
knowledge of reference tools and other sources.
Recommendations
Librarians who were interviewed want to develop their collections,
improve their services, and stand out in this competitive age. Due to
the rapid growth of information, varied application of information
technology, and financial constraints, it has become a big challenge for
library professionals, especially in academic libraries. Improving
quality does not just mean the adoption new and expensive technologies.
It is also possible to work continuously on improving service as budgets
permit. Users attach maximum importance to the relevancy of the needed
material for research and teaching, more than to any other aspect of the
library.
References
Devarajan, G. (1989). User's approach to information in
libraries. New Delhi: Anmol.
Ellis, D., et al. (1993). A comparison of the information seeking pattern of researchers in the physical and social science. Journal of
Documentation 49 (4): 356-60.
Foster, M.B. (1989). A study of use of information sources by
social science researchers. Journal of Academic Librarianship 15 (1):
7-11.
Prasad, H.N. (1992). Information needs and users. Varanasi: Indian
Bibliographic Centre.
Hewins, E.T. (1990). Information needs and use studies. Annual
Review of Information Science and Technology 25: 145-172.
Robinson, J., et al. (1995). Information usage by biological
researchers. Journal of Information Science 22 (1): 47-53.
Sehgal, R.L. (1998). Statistical techniques for librarians. New
Delhi: Ess Ess.
Shineborne, J. (1980). User needs and new technology and
traditional approaches to library services. Journal of Information
Science 2:135-36.
Subramanyam, T. (1983). A study of information seeking behaviour of
doctoral candidates in social sciences. Herald of Library Science
22:104.
Wilson, T. D. (1994). Information needs and uses: 50 years of
progress. In Vickery, B.C. (Ed.) Fifty years of information progress: A
Journal of Documentation Review: Aslib Proceedings. London: 15-51.
Devendra Kumar
Periodical Section, University Library
Faculty Member, Department of Library and Information Science
Chaudhary Charan Singh University
Meerut, India
Distribution of Responses Received
Name Users Response Percent
University Departments 50 30 60.00
Bulandshahar 75 38 50.66
Meerut 75 34 45.33
Muzaffar Nagar 75 31 41.33
Shaharanpur 50 25 50.00
Baghpat 25 12 48.00
Ghaziabad 75 30 40.00
Total 425 200 47.05
Table 1
Purpose of Visit Numbers Percentage
Study/Research/Training 160 80.00
Locate information books and Journals 163 81.50
Borrow books 192 96.00
Light reading 112 56.00
Leisure time 31 15.50
Other 23 11.50
Table 2
Information Sources Preference
Textbook/Handbook 133 [24] 14 [13] 10 [10]
(510.51) (0.18) (0.00)
Encyclopedia 13 [24] 59 [13] 19 [10]
(4.39) (153.80) (7.56)
Dictionaries 15 [24] 17 [13] 22 [10]
(3.66) (7.56) (14.30)
Periodicals 14 [24] 45 [13] 25 [10]
(4.19) (71.58) (29.30)
Technical reports 13 [24] 9 [13] 9 [10]
(4.83) (7.83) (0.86)
Proceedings 12 [24] 16 [13] 34 [10]
(5.14) (3.06) (57.75)
Patents 15 [24] 3 [13] 7 [10]
(2.90) (8.21) (1.56)
Standards 14 [24] 12 [13] 6 [10]
(4.19) (1.05) (1.47)
Thesis/Dissertations 21 [24] 8 [13] 4 [10]
(0.14) (2.74) (3.07)
Reference Books 24 [24] 17 [13] 9 [10]
(0.07) (5.32) (5.56)
Indexes/Abstracts 19.6 [24] 9 [13] 7 [10]
(3.74) (1.52) (4.87)
Bibliographies 17 [24] 10 [13] 1 [10]
(10.22) (5.55) (7.72)
Colleagues 17 [24] 2 [13] 6 [10]
(10.22) (9.55) (1.35)
Conferences 21 [24] 6 [13] 6 [10]
(1.01) (4.06) (1.73)
CD-ROM 18 [24] 3 [13] 6 [10]
(6.79) (7.94) (1.23)
Internet 26 [24] 7 [13] 5 [10]
(2.04) (3.99) (2.17)
e-journals 8 [24] 4 [13] 2 [10]
(7.24) (7.53) (5.95)
Other 15 [24] 1 [13] 2 [10]
(17.00) (10.01) (6.25)
Total 425 242 172
Information Sources Preference
Textbook/Handbook 4 [8] 2 [5] 2 [5]
(2.49) (10.76) (2.54)
Encyclopedia 12 [8] 7 [5] 6 [5]
(1.58) (3.84) (0.47)
Dictionaries 43 [8] 6 [5] 6 [5]
(142.15) (1.18) (1.08)
Periodicals 15 [8] 5 [5] 6 [5]
(4.20) (0.00) (0.74)
Technical reports 9 [8] 7 [5] 6 [5]
(0.00) (4.56) (0.74)
Proceedings 18 [8] 12 [5] 5 [5]
(9.53) (8.22) (0.02)
Patents 2 [8] 0 [5] 2 [5]
(5.62) (5.46) (1.65)
Standards 4 [8] 6 [5] 8 [5]
(18.34) (0.54) (5.17)
Thesis/Dissertations 9 [8] 12 [5] 4 [5]
(0.03) (0.65) (2.05)
Reference Books 13 [8] 12 [5] 21 [5]
(12.22) (12.48) (46.56)
Indexes/Abstracts 6 [8] 2 [5] 9 [5]
(4.84) (14.40) (22.52)
Bibliographies 2 [8] 4 [5] 5 [5]
(32.02) (0.70) (0.41)
Colleagues 7 [8] 6 [5] 3 [5]
(1.51) (1.59) (5.35)
Conferences 4 [8] 5 [5] 6 [5]
(17.17) (0.24) (1.08)
CD-ROM 1 [8] 3 [5] 0 [5]
(6.75) (8.50) (5.35)
Internet 5 [8] 3 [5] 4 [5]
(2.96) (9.64) (3.18)
e-journals 3 [8] 1 [5] 2 [5]
(4.41) (4.27) (3.10)
Other 1 [8] 0 [5] 1 [5]
(6.78) (5.78) (4.61)
Total 158 95 96
Information Sources Preference Total
Textbook/Handbook 1 [4] 33 [29] 200
(1.87) (71.15)
Encyclopedia 2 [4.8] 82 [129] 200
(3.75) (18.50)
Dictionaries 4 [4] 84 [129] 200
(0.00) (18.50)
Periodicals 2 [4] 85 [129] 200
(4.57) (13.20)
Technical reports 4 [4] 143 200
(0.02) [129]
(8.21)
Proceedings 6 [4] 96 [129] 200
(3.58) (8.56)
Patents 3 [4] 169 200
(1.78) [129]
(12.10)
Standards 4 [4] 151 200
(2.88) [129]
(3.60)
Thesis/Dissertations 6 [4] 134 200
(5.27) [129]
Reference Books 10 [4] 98 [129] 200
(0.00) (7.70)
Indexes/Abstracts 14 [4] 132 200
(24.63) [129]
(0.41)
Bibliographies 7 [4] 153 200
(13.74) [129]
(27.04)
Colleagues 8 [4] 166 200
(20.37) [129]
(18.82)
Conferences 2 [4] 166 200
(1.76) [129]
(18.82)
CD-ROM 4 [4] 167 200
(0.53) [129]
(58.40)
Internet 3 [4] 124 200
(4.57) [129]
(4.95)
e-journals 3 [4] 168 200
(4.57) [129]
(11.65)
Other 1 [4] 179 200
(3.26) [129]
(19.25)
Total 84 2330 3600
Table 3
Information Preference
Sources
Book Trade 7
Catalogue [921.8] 2 [18.1] 12 [17.5]
(7.68) (14.84) (10.30)
Bibliographies 24
[21.8] 50 [18.1] 10 [17.5]
(1.37) (347.27) (0.55)
20
Addition list [121.8] 15 [10.1] 45 [17.5]
issued by (0.470) (1.86) (267.22)
library
Book reviews in 24
News papers [21.8] 22 [18.1] 32 [17.5]
and periodicals (2.61) (4.47) (79.90)
21
Internet [21.81] 15 [18.1] 14 [17.5]
(0.02) (2.14) (3.71)
e-journals
6 [21.8] 7 [18.1] 9 [17.5]
(17.40) (6.82) (20.20)
CD-ROM 14
[21.80] 31 [18.1] 26 [17.5]
(17.28) (9.10) (9.50)
Other 10
[121.8] 4 [18.1] 13 [17.5]
(1.53) (17.50) (1.15)
Total 190 146 151
Information Preference
Sources
Book Trade
Catalogue 6 [5.60] 6 [7.5] 4 [2.95]
(0.12) (1.29) (4.47)
Bibliographies 10
6 [5] 4 [7.5] [2.95]
(0.74) (7.87) (3.38)
22
Addition list 9 [5.60] 5 [7.5] [2.95]
issued by (8.50) (14.95) (1.02)
library
Book reviews in 13
News papers [5.60] 29 [7.5] 5 [2.95]
and periodicals (44.74) (391.50) (14.88)
22 10
Internet [5.60] 7 [7.5] [2.95]
(4.24) (0.28) (3.38)
3 [5.60] 30 [7.5] 6 [2.95]
(7.53) (4.19) (18.76)
CD-ROM 20
4 [5.60] 11 [7.5] [2.95]
(2.38) (4.28) (0.29)
1 [5.60] 7 [7.5] 6 [2.5]
(19.88) (5.63) (7.78)
Total 65 99 81
Information Preference
Sources Total
Book Trade 78 200
Catalogue 6 [2.9] 4 [5.9] [124.6]
(4.47) (0.60) (17.84)
Bibliographies 95 200
4 [2.9] 4 [5.9] [124.6]
(7.03) (0.60) (43.64)
14 200
Addition list 4 [2.9] 0 [5.9] [124.6]
issued by (7.03) (5.88) (20.14)
library
Book reviews in 200
News papers 8 [2.9] 0 [5.9] 4 [124.6]
and periodicals (2.49) (5.88) (124.12)
135 200
Internet 7 [2.9] 0 [5.9] [124.6]
(3.41) (5.88) (5.72)
e-journals 160 200
3 [2.9] 3 [5.9] [124.6]
(1.23) (1.41) (910.33)
CD-ROM 68 200
10 [2.9] 8 [5.9] [124.6]
(25.33) (11.60) (11.60)
Other 4 [2.9] 28 [5.9] 124 [6] 200
(7.03) (83.32) (1.08)
45 68 706
Total
Table 4
Details Numbers Percentage
Lack of time 24 12.00
Lack of access to
all the information 56 28.00
Lack of reading material 94 47.00
Lack of knowledge of
information sources 132 66.00
Lack of knowledge in use
of library service 153 76.50
Unfriendly library staff 44 22.00