David Bar-Ilan (1930-2003), z" (l).
Miller, Philip E.
The obituary page of The New York Times for November 5, 2003
carried an obituary for David Bar-Ilan, who had been a spokesman for
Israel's Right-Wing Likud Party. Well before his involvement in
politics, he was a concert pianist, who, many critics and I feel, never
received his due. I certainly do not share his political or ideological
view, but I mourn his passing, for he was part of my youth.
Valentine's Day in 1965 fell on a Sunday, and I had two
tickets for a recital that day by Bar-Ilan at Georgetown
University's Gaston Hall. I really had no idea who he was, other
than the fact that he was Israeli, and I had seen his face on the jacket
of a recording. The recital was simply one of a half-dozen or so
sponsored by the University's Collegium Musicum. And I recall that
my date for that afternoon was a young woman named McCollough whom I had
dated because we shared a passion for classical music.
Valentine's Day in 1965 was also the day a horrific blizzard
hit Washington DC. Not having far to travel since we lived on-campus,
and oblivious of the weather, the two of us trudged to Gaston Hall at
the appointed hour. Gaston Hall is a lovely small auditorium that seats
perhaps 250 souls, making it perfect for recitals, with gold and
dark-hued wooden paneling heightening the hall's intimacy.
When we arrived, we were nonplussed to see that we were among
perhaps two dozen stalwarts who weathered the storm in order to attend
the recital. Although the recital was sold out, the very small audience
made us wonder if the recital would go on at all. But at the appointed
hour, Bar-Ilan made his entrance. His face fell as he stopped in his
tracks, seeing less than one row filled. But as quickly as he showed his
disappointment, he threw back his shoulders and smiled at us.
Approaching the footlights, he addressed us in flawless English,
thanking us for braving the storm for what was actually his Washington
DC debut.
The recital that followed was certainly unorthodox, for before and
after each piece, he spoke to us about the piece, pointing out what he
felt the composer was trying to express. In brief, we enjoyed both a
formal recital and an informal lecture.
Afterwards, 'there was a reception for Bar-Ilan given by the
Collegium Musicum. Although a university-sponsored activity, it was
exclusive and elitist. One needed to be nominated for membership, and
prospective members could be blackballed. I never aspired to be a member
of this group for obvious reasons.
Ms. McCollough wanted to hear me speak Hebrew, which I did poorly,
only having lived in Israel three months during the previous summer. But
I admit that I also wanted to impress her. So we crashed the reception,
which was peopled by Jesuit priests and by the members of this snobbish group, all uniformly attired in their Georgetown blazers and school
ties. I cannot say now if it was planned or not on my part, but I too
was wearing my Georgetown blazer and school tie, so my presence did not
immediately seem irregular.
I approached Maestro Bar-Ilan, who was surrounded by well-wishers,
and when my turn came, I introduced Ms. McCollough and myself in Hebrew.
At that moment the hue and cry went up that I was a crasher, and several
chubbies made the move to eject me from the room. Maestro Bar-Ilan held
up his hand to stay them, and said in Hebrew that he would not remain at
the reception if his translator were forced to leave.
For the next half-hour, people fielded questions to him, some
rather technical, which I would then attempt to render into Hebrew. This
was rather funny, as his English was as good as anyone's in the
room. And he gave his answers in a highly anglicized Hebrew so I could
"translate," for him. Our farewells at the end of the
afternoon were warm, and I felt that I had been in the presence of a
talented artist who was also a very kind gentleman.
Paul Hume, the noted music critic of the Washington Post, wrote in
his review the next day of this most unusual recital, telling those who
had tickets but missed it on account of the blizzard that they had
missed musical "fireworks."
The story does not end there. During the summer of 1968, I
subscribed to a weekly series of piano recitals in Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Not having much money, I had to satisfy myself with a seat at the back
of Rackham Auditorium, which was several times the size of Gaston Hall.
I would have preferred a seat on the aisle to accommodate my long legs,
but mine was the seat next to the seat on the aisle. Perhaps I could
prevail on the occupant to switch places with me.
The occupant turned out to be an attractive blonde woman, who was a
student at the University of Michigan's School of Music, but also
the head of the cadre of ushers. And because she had to be up and down
the aisles, changing seats with her was not possible. Incidentally, this
head usher was Barbara Nissman, an internationally known concert pianist
today. htt://www.barbaranissman.com)
Over that summer, I walked Maestra Nissman home to her apartment
after each of the recitals, in spite of my room being all the way on the
other side of town, a good hour's walk. And I was invited in for
coffee as she and women with whom she shared the apartment, also
students of piano at the University, played recordings of the pieces we
had heard that evening and analyzed them technically. Frankly, I was out
of my depth, but the conversation was both thrilling and fascinating.
David Bar-Ilan was performing the final recital of that summer
series, and Ms. Nissman confessed that she had never heard him play. Nor
was she excited about the prospect, for how could he compete or be in
the same league with the likes of Micia de Larrocha, Vladimir Ashkenazy,
and other well-known contemporaries? But after he played the opening
piece of his recital, Ms. Nissman turned to me and said, "He is
good!"
After the recital, she took me through the caverns of Rackham
Auditorium to the Green Room where we could greet Mr. Bar-Ilan. There
was already a line, so we waited our turn. Ms. Nissman approached him,
extended her hand, and congratulated him.
Keeping his eyes firmly planted upon her face, he said in Hebrew,
"Well, Fayvel, this woman is far lovelier than the last one!"
Ms. Nissman had no idea of what he was talking about and was undoubtedly
wondering what he had actually said and why. With a roaring laugh, he
turned to me and gave me a bear hug. My spoken Hebrew had improved
tremendously since our first encounter, and so we conversed easily in
Hebrew and also in English.
As we left he said, "Stay in touch." But of course, we
never did. I was saddened that he left the concert stage for politics,
especially for a brand of politics to which I do not subscribe. Now he
is gone and I wonder if the recordings he made in the early 1960s on LP
and so cherished by aficionados are available on compact disc. (Yes,
there was one, released in 1999, the last time I checked.)
As I admired him as an artist and a gentleman, so must I admire him
as a man of political consistency and unswerving conviction despite my
own views. He passed through my life only momentarily, yet I read of his
death with feelings of personal sadness. Yehi zichro baruch.
PHILIP E. MILLER is director of the Klau Library, Hebrew Union
College-Jewish Institute of Religion, New York City. His previous
publication in Midstream, "Corpral Hohenzollern: A Memoir,
"appeared in April 2003.