Bankers, Bureaucrats, and Central Bank Politics: The Myth of Neutrality.
Quiliconi, Cintia
Bankers, Bureaucrats, and Central Bank Politics: The Myth of
Neutrality. By Christopher Adolph. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press, 2013.
This book offers new ideas to the conventional thinking about
central banks and monetary policy by challenging the view that central
banks tend to choose optimal policies if given enough freedom to do so.
The book's main focus is on bureaucratic agents and their policy
preferences. The main argument is that "shadow principals in the
financial sector and partisan governments shape the beliefs and career
incentives of bureaucratic agents otherwise legally insulated from
outside pressure" (p. 1). The book claims that central bankers
perpetuate the myth of neutrality because it serves to cover the
distributional costs of monetary policy (p. 10).
Christopher Adolph makes the obvious but vital argument that
central bankers are not neutral bureaucrats because, for many of them,
central banking is a step toward a career in the financial sector. Thus,
they are driven by their narrow professional perspectives and ambitions
since they are concerned with pleasing future employers, and they bend
policies to win the approval of shadow principals--particularly big
banks--instead of having the public interest as their main objective.
The book contributes to the debates about how agents and
institutions shape outcomes, and it is framed theoretically by debates
on interests and institutions in comparative political economy. The
arguments are methodologically well operationalized through the creation
of a theory of career effects to measure central bankers'
motivations for career socialization and incentives in Chapter 2. This
chapter analyzes whether central bankers who are bureaucrats are more or
less combative on inflation than central bankers who have a career
history in the financial sector, thus showing that monetary policy is
made according to central bankers' career paths (p. 54).
Chapter 3 examines the impact of career backgrounds on the level of
inflation by exploring data for industrialized countries. It also
considers the effect of the "revolving door" between the
central bank and financial sector (p. 33). The chapter finds important
links between pre- and post-central bank careers, which influence
central bankers' policy preferences, suggesting that career
ambitions play a significant role in affecting inflation (p. 103).
In general terms, this is a thought-provoking book on how interests
and socialization influence monetary policy. The book will be
particularly useful for those studying monetary policymaking,
delegation, and bureaucracy as well as for scholars interested in
comparative political economy.
Reviewed by Cintia Quiliconi