Political Order and Political Decay: From the Industrial Revolution to the Globalization of Democracy.
Wisor, Scott
Political Order and Political Decay: From the Industrial Revolution
to the Globalization of Democracy. By Francis Fukuyama. New York:
Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2014.
This is the second of Francis Fukuyama's two-volume set on
political order. In this volume, Fukuyama focuses on the development of
political orders that permit innovation, growth, and the promotion of
well-being and that guarantee certain basic liberties and rights. Three
aspects are distinctive about Fukuyama's approach to political
institutions, in contrast to other recent big books on political
institutions, including Why Nations Fail (Daron Acemoglu and James
Robinson, 2012) and Violence and Social Orders (Douglass North, John
Wallis, and Barry Weingast, 2009). First, Fukuyama highlights the
importance of state capacity, especially in terms of the development of
a merit-based autonomous bureaucracy, as central to the development of
society more generally. Oftentimes, these capable states emerge before
democratization occurs. Second, Fukuyama shows that social and economic
conditions, especially in terms of a growing middle class with an
interest in the rule of law and a willingness to compete for the
electoral support of lower classes, must be right for democratization to
occur. Third, Fukuyama shows that well-developed democratic political
orders can decay. Institutions can be captured by special interest
groups, and both the rule of law and accountable electoral politics can
be distorted to serve the interests of the few rather than many. The
United States, in his view, is an example of political institutions that
are decaying. Growing economic inequality, and the capture of both the
electoral process and the media by narrow special interests, as well as
the proliferation of vetoes across branches of government threaten the
prosperity and stability that was characteristic of the United States in
the latter half of the twentieth century. In an otherwise extremely
powerful book, one weak spot emerges when Fukuyama attacks identity
politics as detrimental to securing political institutions that deliver
economic prosperity. This may be overly simplistic, as many of the
claims made by women and ethnic minorities, for example, are not about
special recognition but about access to more equal economic opportunity.