Power and Regionalism in Latin America: The Politics of Mercosur.
Quiliconi, Cintia
Power and Regionalism in Latin America: The Politics of Mercosur.
By Laura Gomez-Mera. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 2013.
The way that the Southern Common Market (Mercosur) has unfolded
since its creation in 1994 seems to present a paradox. While its
institutional structure has sustained and reinforced a distinctive
identity among members, it has been less effective in amalgamating the
divergent calculations of individual member states, particularly that of
Argentina and Brazil, who support very different, and even conflicting,
economic policies affecting the raison d'etre of Mercosur. Laura
Gomez-Mera addresses this paradox by arguing that on the one hand the
bloc has not been weakened, yet on the other Mercosur s endurance
remains "weak" (pp. 213-217). According to Gomez-Mera,
domestic political forces weaken incentives for regional cooperation.
This argument is made by examining external vulnerability and power
asymmetries as drivers of conflicting incentives for regional
cooperation in Mercosur. While these are defining features of crisis,
what defines resilience in Mercosur is precisely weak institutions yet
strong identity.
The book unfolds in eight chapters. The first three chapters offer
a conceptual framework combining a rationalist approach focusing on
power considerations and constructivist insights to explain the
formation of national preferences in regard to regional cooperation.
This theoretical ambition explains the tension between power asymmetries
despite convergent identities between Argentina and Brazil (pp.
138-140). This framework is followed by empirical analysis developed in
Chapters 4 through 6 where the author examines bilateral sectoral
disputes on automobiles, footwear products, and the issues in the
implementation of the common external tariff. Chapter 7 turns to the
more recent attempts by Argentina and Brazil to deal with textiles, home
appliances, and wine, key "sensitive sectors that have been a
primary source of bilateral tensions since the late 1990s (pp. 157-196).
These cases prove the theoretical claim developed in the opening
chapters that address the tensions between national preferences and
positions during the dispute as well as the distributional outcome of
the conflict. Finally, the closing chapter summarizes the main empirical
findings and discusses implications for how regionalism is practiced and
theorized.
Gomez-Mera's argument is convincing and well developed despite
the combination of two seemingly incompatible theoretical and
ontological approaches; that is, classical neorealism and
constructivism. This is an interesting and timely book given the recent
changes in the political economy of regional integration in Latin
America and, thus, will appeal to scholars interested in regionalism,
international political economy, and Latin American politics.