首页    期刊浏览 2025年07月12日 星期六
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Being literate: then and now.
  • 作者:Mackenzie, Noella M.
  • 期刊名称:Practically Primary
  • 印刷版ISSN:1324-5961
  • 出版年度:2015
  • 期号:October
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:Australian Literacy Educators' Association
  • 摘要:While high stakes testing in Australia does not begin until year three, anecdotal evidence suggests that there has been a downward pressure on Australian teachers to start literacy instruction, which is easily measurable and reflects old definitions of literacy, even before children begin school. Formalised, structured approaches to literacy instruction have also been linked to high stakes testing in the United States of America and the United Kingdom. Sadly, schools and preschools in Australia have felt the pressure with parents often asking for 'back to basics' approaches to literacy instruction that they believe will advantage their children. Commercial phonics programs and literacy coaching provided outside the preschool or school have also become popular. Many teachers are being required to program and teach in ways that are more structured, less creative than they have been in generations and given less freedom to trust their professional judgement and their children's interests and needs.
  • 关键词:Literacy;Literacy programs

Being literate: then and now.


Mackenzie, Noella M.



One of the most significant changes in literacy education over the last twenty years is our understanding of literacy as literacies or multiliteracies. To be literate in today's world, you must be able to create, interpret and question 'oral, visual, audio, gestural, tactile and spatial patterns of meaning (Kalantzis & Cope, 2012, p. 2). This has taken us way beyond the notions of reading, writing, listening and speaking as discrete areas of learning and highlighted the importance of multimodality and critical literacies. Technology has supported this process, making the creation, interpretation and dissemination of multimodal texts possible in ways not seen previously. The introduction of the Australian Curriculum has supported our understandings of contemporary literacies and provided the scaffold for teachers and schools to embrace literacies as tools for learning across all disciplines and life generally. However, it almost seems that in parallel to this shift in understanding of what it means to be literate in contemporary times, we have seen the introduction of high stakes testing, increased accountability and a 'back to basics' cry from the more conservative members of Australian society.

While high stakes testing in Australia does not begin until year three, anecdotal evidence suggests that there has been a downward pressure on Australian teachers to start literacy instruction, which is easily measurable and reflects old definitions of literacy, even before children begin school. Formalised, structured approaches to literacy instruction have also been linked to high stakes testing in the United States of America and the United Kingdom. Sadly, schools and preschools in Australia have felt the pressure with parents often asking for 'back to basics' approaches to literacy instruction that they believe will advantage their children. Commercial phonics programs and literacy coaching provided outside the preschool or school have also become popular. Many teachers are being required to program and teach in ways that are more structured, less creative than they have been in generations and given less freedom to trust their professional judgement and their children's interests and needs.

The contradiction between what it means to be literate in today's world and the pressures of high stakes testing is causing frustration for many teachers as they try to force children who have been born into a multimodal world to adopt and learn old understandings of what it means to be literate. Contemporary students deserve and respond to approaches to teaching which value 'contemporary literacies and students' existing ways of knowing' (Mackenzie, 2011, p. 338).

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

References

Kalantzis, M., & Cope, B. (2012). Literacies. Port Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.

Mackenzie, N.M. (2011). From drawing to writing: What happens when you shift teaching priorities in the first six months of school? Australian Journal of Language & Literacy, 34(3), 322-340.

Noella Mackenzie is a Senior Lecturer in literacy studies at Charles Sturt University, Australia. She has been an active member of ALEA for many years, on the planning committee for the national conference in Victoria and is a contributing author to ALEA publications. Email: nmackenzie@csu.edu.au
联系我们|关于我们|网站声明
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有