Editorial.
Lock, Graeme ; White, Simone ; Hastings, Wendy 等
Welcome to the second 2010 issue of Education in Rural Australia.
The articles published in this issue discuss a range of investigations
relating to different levels of education in rural Australia. Rural
disadvantage is the topic of the first article by Janice Franklin from
Charles Sturt University, who tests the validity of this construct
through a study of a school, which appears to satisfy all the measures
of social and economic disadvantage. The focus of her study was the
school's "transition to employment and further education
program". Using document analysis, staff and Year 11 student
interviews, she identified a disconnect between program intent and
student opinion about its impact on the choice to complete Year 12 or
other further education and employment options. The article sets the
challenge for future research to attend to the connection between
reality and rhetoric in rural educational opportunities.
In the second article Bronwyn Ellis, Julie Watkinson and Janet
Sawyer, from the Centre for Rural Health and Community Development at
the University of South Australia, discuss the final stage of a
longitudinal research project, which investigated the impact of a new
university presence in a South Australian regional city. In particular,
they focus on the individual stories of three students who were members
of the first student cohort when the project commenced. In bringing
their article to a conclusion, the authors indicate that the final stage
of this study confirmed findings from the project's earlier stages,
particularly in terms of contributing to the region's employment
needs, and assisting in the retention of current and potential
professionals.
An investigation into building mathematics and science capacity in
a New South Wales' (NSW) rural non-government school system is the
subject of this issue's third article. The study by Vince Connor,
Billinda Auld, Patricia Eakin, Kerry Morris and Michael Tilston from the
Catholic Education Office, Diocese of Bathurst, NSW, was motivated by
concern for student participation and achievement rates in senior
mathematics and science. The paper discusses action research undertaken
by four teacher leaders, from four different schools, who formed a
taskforce to address the rate of participation and achievement levels in
maths and science in their respective schools. In essence, their study
found that, while there had been improvements in collegiality,
confidence and motivation of staff in addressing their concerns, more
work is required to achieve significant improvements.
In the fourth article Fiona McLean and Roselyn Dixon, from the
Faculty of Education, University of Wollongong, discuss the experiences
of four teachers in two NSW rural isolated schools, who teach students
with Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD). They report that the teacher
participants, who they interviewed, had limited access to support,
experienced high levels of stress and that as graduate teachers, they
felt underprepared for teaching students with ODD. The authors frame
five recommendations designed to overcome the challenges identified by
the teachers who were interviewed.
The final article in this issue, by Tania Broadley from Curtin
University, is focussed on rural teacher access to ICT professional
learning. Using analysis of both quantitative and qualitative data, the
author presents a thorough account of principal and teacher perceptions
about access to professional development and professional learning
communities in rural schools. Her data showed that principals and
teachers preferred a blended approach of face-to-face and online
professional development, rather than using ICT in isolation.
Graeme Lock
Simone White
Wendy Hastings
Maxine Cooper
Editors, Education in Rural Australia