Healing Traditions: African Medicine, Cultural Exchange, and Competition in South Africa, 1820-1948.
Clark, Patricia G.
Healing Traditions: African Medicine, Cultural Exchange, and
Competition in South Africa, 1820-1948, by Karen E. Flint. New African Histories series. Athens, Ohio, Ohio University Press, co-published with
University of KwaZulu-Natal Press, 2008. xiv, 274 pp. $55.00 US (cloth),
$26.95 US (paper).
Since the appearance of Eric Hobsbawm and Terence Ranger's The
Invention of Tradition in the 1980s, historians have investigated
cultural customs and rituals as historically constructed practices. In
particular, historians of Africa analyze the concept of tradition as
used by Europeans to justify colonial rule. Here, Karen E. Flint
examines the idea of "tradition" in medicine as practiced in
Zululand and Natal, South Africa, in the nineteenth and early twentieth
centuries. Using the lenses of cultural interaction and competition,
Flint outlines the historical nature of African therapeutics, or what is
now termed "traditional" African medicine.
According to Flint, cultural exchange and interaction shaped
African therapeutics. In the 1800s, this exchange took place between
Africans in the Zulu kingdom and white traders and missionaries, as well
as among other African ethnic groups. The first two chapters of the book
examine healing practices in the Zulu kingdom during its heyday from
1820-1879. As the Zulu kingdom rose, Zulu-speaking inyangas (herbalists)
and isangomas (diviners) encountered new diseases brought by
colonialism, as well as new methods of healing. African therapeutic
practices included not only pharmacological approaches (some similar to
allopathic Western medical practices), but also appeals to ancestors and
the "smelling out" of witches. Inyangas and isangomas healed
not only the individual body, but also the body politic. In the Zulu
kingdom, healers helped maintain the health of the king and thereby the
kingdom.
The third chapter focuses on changes in white reactions to
indigenous healers and concepts of healing in the nineteenth century. In
the early 1800s cultural exchange between Africans and Europeans was
evident. Some whites in Natal such as settler Henry Francis Fynn
utilized African muthi (medicine) in combination with European remedies
to heal Africans and whites alike. By the mid-1800s, however, African
healers were perceived as competition to missionaries and destabilizing
to white rule. In the 1860s, colonial legislation criminalized African
healers and rainmakers, forbidding them to employ their expertise. Even
so, in 1891 the legislature made the decision (unique in South Africa)
to grant official recognition through licensure to African midwives and
herbalists, but not diviners. This acknowledgment of African healers
whose practices more closely approximated those of Western medical
practitioners demonstrated the government's admission of the need
to provide health care to Africans, as well as its desire to maintain
nominal control over medical provision in the colony.
By the early to mid-1900s, healing the body politic was no longer
possible. South Africa was increasingly urbanized, Africans were crowded
into "native reserves," and migrant labor spread disease
across local and regional boundaries. In this environment, competition
became crucial in shaping African medicine.
In an intriguing chapter entitled "Competition, Race and
Professionalization: African Healers and White Medical Practitioners,
1891-1948," Flint delineates the contested nature of the
relationship between African and white medical practitioners in the
first half of the twentieth century. The South African Medical, Dental,
and Pharmacy Act, passed in 1928, limited medical practice to
practitioners recognized by the South African Medical Association,
effectively undermining African health care workers. In response,
African healers set up their own professional associations, the African
Native Doctors' Association in 1928 and the Natal Native Medical
Association in 1931. Although these organizations sought to confer
legitimacy on African healers, they were not officially recognized by
the government. Nonetheless, by professionalizing and claiming authority
over a body of expert knowledge, these healers helped to define African
therapeutics.
The relationship between African and Indian medical providers in
Natal, however, was one of cultural exchange, not contestation, as Flint
describes in chapter five. Indians began to arrive in South Africa as
indentured sugar plantation workers in the 1860s, and brought their
Hindu, Muslim, and Ayurvedic healing practices with them. Indian
herbalists and muthi shop owners emerged to serve the health care needs
of the growing Indian community. These health care providers interacted
with Africans and the local environment, learning about indigenous herbs
and incorporating this knowledge to treat African as well as Indian
patients.
The book concludes with an epilogue that notes the contemporary
relevance of the social history of medicine to current South African
health issues such as bioprospecting, HIV/AIDS, and the licensing of
"traditional" healers.
In building on the works of previous historians and anthropologists
of African medicine such as Megan Vaughan and John Janzen, Flint's
work serves as a model for social and cultural history of medicine that
is attentive to the vagaries of available sources. Flint draws on oral
histories, government archives, and professional journals of the period,
discussing thoroughly the challenges of writing a history of African
health care utilizing sources written by Europeans.
Flint's work is of interest not only to historians of
medicine, but also social-cultural historians working with topics as
varied as witchcraft and professionalization. Flint does assume,
however, that the reader is familiar with South African history. Some of
the events described could have been put into context for the
nonspecialist: for example, in the early twentieth century South
Africa's increasingly segregated society spawned the formation of
many racially defined professional organizations. African teachers and
nurses, not just healers, formed their own professional groups. Taken as
a whole, the work demonstrates that the syncretic nature of the current
South African medical environment results from almost 200 years of
dynamic cultural exchange and competition.
Patricia G. Clark
Westminster College