After the Propaganda State: Media, Politics, and "Thought Work" in Reformed China.
Kinkley, Jeffrey C. ; Colwill, Elizabeth
After the Propaganda State: Media, Politics, and "Thought
Work" in Reformed China, by Daniel C. Lynch. Stanford, California,
Stanford University Press, 1999. xiii, 327 pp. $45.00 U. S.
How far toward "post-socialism" has China really gone?
Will telecommunications advances doom the present authoritarianism?
Daniel C. Lynch's authoritative and well-researched book takes the
often well-hidden pulse of structural change in China's new and old
media and communications, throwing light on the bigger questions.
It is illuminating to compare this book, whose coverage climaxes
around 1995-96, with Perry Link's The Uses of Literature
(Princeton, 2000), the standard sociology of early and mid-1980s Chinese
book and magazine printing and distribution. Both works are
methodologically sophisticated and based on extensive interviewing in
China and analysis of published sources. Lynch updates Link on the print
media, telling how ISBNs are sold to private publishers and
distributors, the role of paid advertising disguised as journalism, and
so forth, but the big story now is television, with its handsome
advertising revenues; radio, financially strapped but subsidized;
cinema; and telecommunications. Lynch indicates that from 1989 to 1996,
long-distance telephone calls per capita increased fifteen-fold and fax
messages went from 240,000 to 5.6 million. "More than 80 per cent
of Chinese households owned a television set in 1996, up from nearly
none in 1978." Foreign firms sold TV commercials directly to
out-of-control local stations. The latter were not above selling the
same air time twice, so foreign suppliers hired Hong Kong-based
monitoring firms to roam China and see if the ads were really broadcast.
Lynch's most abstract conclusions are circumspect and mostly
negative: despite all the change and uncontrolled communication, China
is not necessarily headed toward having a "liberal public
sphere" or "civil society." Segments of society newly
given voice and power by the media are striving chaotically for their
own interests. The result is not a "liberal" but a
"praetorian" society (Samuel Huntington's concept, duly
cited). The new messages sent are not political (media messages tend
toward tawdry entertainment), and even when they impinge on policy, they
do not lead to the formation of new institutions.
This is not particularly startling. Might tawdriness even be
distracting us from residual political effects, as it may be the Chinese
authorities? After the Propaganda State deliberately excludes analysis
of the content of China's new communications -- unlike Link and
analyses of propaganda like Ben Xu's Disenchanted Democracy
(University of Michigan Press, 1999) and Geremie Barme's In the Red
(Columbia University Press, 1999). Lynch's focus is on central and
local state institutions, their formal and covert relations with each
other and with private and foreign firms, and their degrees of market
(formerly, population) penetration. Procedures, deals, and bureaucratic
rivalries are covered in illuminating detail, with state versus society
as the major paradigm, and within the state, local versus central and
ministry versus ministry. Little is said about the Communist
Party's role in guiding the state, about which segments
of"society" have newly gained a voice, or how they have
changed as listeners as well as originators of messages. Lynch is,
however, forced to discuss policy in his penultimate chapter, on an
"omnidirectional crackdown" that began in 1993, outlawing
unauthorized private TV satellite dishes, ISBN sales, "paid
news," etcetera. Of course, many of those measures stalled. Again,
Lynch expertly outlines the structural causes, not the policy ones. He
does look at levels of political dissidence in, for instance, call-in
shows.
The book's biggest contribution, apart from the wealth of data
it serves up (much of which was purposely hidden by those who were
profiting and flouting regulations), are not answers to the most
abstract questions about where China is headed, but a purposeful
complication of our understanding of all the social processes now
diminishing Chinese authoritarianism. After the Propaganda State argues
that administrative fragmentation, property-rights reform, and
technological advance are three independent variables lessening central
control of propaganda, information, and communication. New technologies
enabling thousand-fold increases in messages would not have led to
today's cacophony but for the simultaneous devolution of
administrative power and the conferring of new rights on local
broadcasters, network builders, printers, and distributors to retain
profits so as to be able to earn their own keep and buy off supervising
levels. How the three variables have interacted is demonstrated in case
after case. Distinctions between commercialization, globalization (defined as reception of messages originating outside of China), and
pluralization in the new media cacophony are also outlined. The bulk of
the book is a demonstration of those three tendencies, each in its own
chapter, with each chapter treating different media. To get "the
full story" on any one medium (there are so many now) -- including
shifts in its finances, autonomy, even which ministry it belongs to --
requires the reader to connect up passages from several chapters. It is
refreshing to see "thought" and communication taken seriously
as engines of social change. Yet, actually proving their importance is
not a topic the author has taken up.
Technology now changes so swiftly that no book can capture it any
more. China's Internet use took off after Lynch's research in
China was completed. But here we judge the book's value for history
and historians. After the Propaganda State will remain a rare and
valuable snapshot of a society in transition, framed by nuanced
explanations of the many ways in which authoritarianism can be eroded.
Jeffrey C. Kinkley
St. John's University, New York