Accounting for the non-employment of U.S. men, 1968-2010.
Kudlyak, Marianna ; Lubik, Thomas ; Tompkins, Jonathan 等
Men in their prime working age, defined as men between the ages of
25 and 64, constitute 33 percent of the civilian non-institutionalized
population in the United States. At the trough of the 1969-1970
recession, 6.5 percent of this group (henceforth,
"population") were out of the labor force (OLE), 90.8 percent
were employed, and 2.7 percent were unemployed. Since then, the
employment-to-population ratio has trended persistently downward, while
the OLF-to-population ratio has increased substantially. (1) In 2010,
the aftermath of the 2007-2009 recession, the employment-to-population
ratio of this same group declined to an all-time low of 76.3 percent,
while the OLF-to-population ratio increased to an all-time high of 14.7
percent (see Figure 1, Panels A C).
In this article, we investigate the extent to which the change in
the sociodemographic composition of the population (by age, educational
attainment, marital status, and race) has contributed to the changes in
the aggregate labor market outcomes. Our emphasis on the compositional
changes in the sociodemographic characteristics of the population is
motivated by a literature rife with correlations between
sociodemographic factors and labor market outcomes. In particular, older
workers typically experience lower rates of labor force participation
and, conditional on participating, older workers are less likely to be
unemployed than younger workers (see, for example, Shinier 1999). The
literature also finds that (i) more highly educated workers have a
higher opportunity cost of not working; (ii) married men are more likely
to participate in the labor force and, conditional on participation,
more likely to be employed; and (iii) non-white persons are usually
underrepresented in the labor force and employment. Thus, one expects a
strong association between labor market outcomes and the demographic
composition of the labor force, which serves as a reduced-form
representation of underlying structural relationships.
[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]
In this article, we decompose the observed changes in aggregate
labor market outcomes into changes in the sociodemographic composition
of the population and changes in the labor market outcomes of different
sociodemographic groups. For each yea, we generate two sets of
counterfactual aggregate labor market outcomes. The first set is
generated by using the sociodemographic composition of the population
from all the years in the sample and holding the labor market outcomes
of different sociodemographic groups constant at the actual level of the
reference year. The second set is generated by holding the
sociodemographic composition constant instead. We then use these
counterfactuals to perform the decomposition of the changes in the
aggregate labor market outcomes. Finally, we use the most recent
sociodemographic composition of the population to forecast the aggregate
OLF-to-population ratio in 2015.
Given the similarities between the 1980-1982 and 2007-2009
recessions in terms of severity, we emphasize, throughout this article,
comparisons between the labor market outcomes in 1983 and 2010. We find
that the changes in the demographic composition of the population
explain much of the historical upward trend in the OLF ratio. The OLF
ratio increased from 11.1 percent in 1983 to 14.7 percent in 2010. Of
this increase, 1.9 percentage points (49 percent of the total change)
are attributable to changes in the sociodemographic composition of the
population. The employment-to-population ratio fell from 80.2 percent in
1983 to 76.3 percent in 2010. We find that changes in the
sociodemographic composition of the population account for 1.7
percentage points (44 percent) of this decline. The
unemployment-to-population ratio increased from 8.7 percent in 1983 to
8.9 percent in 2010, but none of this increase can be accounted for by
changes in the demographic composition of the population. Finally, using
predicted changes in the age distribution of the population, we estimate
that the OLF-to-population ratio will increase to more than 16 percent
in 2015 as compared to 14.7 percent in 2010.
When interpreting our results we need to be wary that changes in
the sociodemographic composition might cause changes in the labor market
outcomes of different sociodemographic groups. Alternatively, changes in
the labor market outcomes of some sociodemographic groups might cause
changes in the sociodemographic composition of the population. For
example, an increase in the employment probability for higher educated
workers relative to other education levels might contribute to an
increase in the educational attainment of the population. Alternatively,
an increase in educational attainment of the population can change the
employment probabilities of different groups. Our accounting exercise
does not account for these effects.
This article is related to the existing literature that documents a
secular decline in the labor force participation of prime working age
men. Autor and Duggan (2003) document a substantial fall in labor force
participation among men. Using data from the Current Population Survey
(CPS), Juhn, Murphy, and Topel (1991, 2002) find that falling
unemployment rates among men in the 1990s greatly exaggerated the
improvements of the labor outcomes for this population because the
period was also characterized by a fall in the labor force participation
rate. We update their analyses by focusing on the decomposition of the
changes in the labor outcomes into changes in the sociodemographic
characteristics of the population and by adding data from the most
recent decade. Our work is also closely related to Little and Bradley
(2007), who use a multinomial logistic model to study the
sociodemographic determinants of labor market outcomes, distinguishing
employment, unemployment, peripheral inactivity (marginally attached to
labor force), and OLF, in Great Britain. Finally, our work expands on
that of Fallick and Pingle (2006), who decompose movements in U.S. labor
force participation into aging of the population and labor force trends
within age groups. Whereas these authors focus solely on changes in the
OLF-to-population ratio caused by aging of the population, we consider
changes in each employment status caused by changes in four different
sociodemographic factors.
The article is structured as follows. Section 1 describes the data.
Section 2 summarizes the changes in the demographic composition of the
population of working age men between 1968-2010 and documents trends in
labor market outcomes by sociodemographic groups. Section 3 describes
the decomposition exercise and presents results of the decomposition of
changes in labor outcomes between 2010 and the earlier years. Section 4
presents the forecast of the 2015 OLF-to-population ratio. Section 5
concludes.
1. DATA
We use data from the Integrated Public Use Microdata Series CPS
(IPUMS-CPS), which comprises data from the March Supplement of the
Current Population Survey (hereafter referred to as the March CPS). The
CPS is a monthly survey of U.S. households' activities, conducted
by the Census Bureau and the Bureau of Labor Statistics and designed to
measure unemployment. The basic survey is conducted every month; over
time various supplementary surveys have been conducted to study
different social and economic questions. The March CPS contains in-depth
information on sociodemographic characteristics of the population and
income. The variables in IPUMS-CPS are coded identically or
"harmonized" over the years.
The CPS is a collection of individual-level data obtained from the
interviewed households. We focus on males between the ages of 25 and
64.2 Throughout the analysis we use the March CPS sampling weights that
account for a complex survey design. The aggregate annual statistics
that we report thus correspond to March of a respective year.
It should be noted that in 1994 the CPS underwent a major redesign
both in the wording of its questions and in the methodology of the data
collection process, which led to some discrepancies between the
aggregate series constructed from the microdata prior to the redesign
and post-redesign. However, it is not a concern of our analysis because
the inconsistencies associated with the aggregate labor statistics for
the sample of 25-64-year-old men are minor and not statistically
significant (see Polivka and Miller [1995]).
2. SOCIODEMOGRAPHIC COMPOSITION OF THE POPULATION AND LABOR
OUTCOMES BY DIFFERENT GROUPS
Between 1968-2010 there have been considerable changes in the
distribution of 25-64-year-old civilian, non-institutionalized men by
age and education, and some noticeable changes by marital status and
race (Figure 2). Figures 3-5 display the time series of labor outcomes
by different sociodemographic groups. In general, across different
groups the employment-to-population ratio has been trending down, while
the OLF-to-population has been gradually increasing. We now describe
each figure in detail.
Sociodemographic Composition
Panel A of Figure 2 shows the changes in the shares of 25-34,
35-44, 45-54, and 55-64-year-old men in the population. From 1968-1986,
the share of 25-34-year-old men grew steadily, reaching its largest
fraction of 35.6 percent in 1986, and declined thereafter. The share of
55-64-year-old men fell from 1968-7995, reaching its smallest fraction
of 15 percent in 1995, and has increased steadily since. From 2000 to
present, the shares of older workers (45-54 and 55-64-year-olds) have
been increasing, while the shares of younger workers (25-34 and 35
44-year-olds) have been decreasing. This shift in the age distribution
toward older workers is largely because of the aging of the Baby Boom
generation. In 2010, the shares of 25-34, 35-44, 45-54, and
55-64-year-olds were 25.8, 25.2, 27.5, and 21.5, respectively.
[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]
Panel B of Figure 2 shows the upward trend in the educational
attainment of the population and reveals that the shares of men with
some college, college, or higher than college education have been
increasing at the expense of men with at most a high school degree. The
share of the latter has declined from 74.6 percent in 1969 to 44.0
percent in 2010. Panel C shows that the population distribution by
marital status has shifted toward divorced or separated and single men
at the expense of married men. In 1968, 84.8 percent of the
25-64-year-old men were married, while only 61.1 percent were married in
2010. Finally, Panel D shows that the share of white men in the
population has been steadily falling over the last 40 years while the
shares of black men and men of other races have been increasing.
[FIGURE 3 OMITTED]
Employment-to-Population Ratio
Employment-to-population ratios by age are shown in Figure 3, Panel
A, The figure shows that the proportion of employed workers for the
25-34,35-44, and 45-54 age groups move in sync over the years, declining
from roughly .95 in 1968 to approximately .80 in 2010. The 55-64 age
group has displayed markedly different behavior, declining from
approximately .82 in 1968 to an all-time low of .60 in 1994 before
trending back up to .65 in 2010.
Figure 3, Panel B displays the employment-to-population ratio by
educational attainment. For each group there is a clear decline in the
employment-to-population ratio over time, with the severity of this
decline decreasing in years of schooling. From 1968-2010, those with
more than a college education and those with just a college degree have
seen moderate declines of .06 and .1 1, respectively, while those with
some college experience and those with at most a high school degree have
experienced larger declines of .18 and .21, respectively.
The employment-to-population ratio trends by marital status are
displayed in Figure 3, Panel C. Though there have been decreases in the
employment-to-population ratio across marital status groups from
1968-2010, we observe that much of these declines came prior to 1980 and
after 2007. Between these two dates, the employment-to-population ratio
across marital status groups shows little or no trend.
Panel D of Figure 3 shows the employment-to-population ratio for
each race. We observe declines in the employment-to-population ratio for
whites, blacks, and others over the sample period, with this decline
being most pronounced for blacks. The employment-to-population ratio
fell by approximately .24 for this group from 1968-2010, whereas the
employment-to-population ratio for whites and others declined by .14 and
.10, respectively.
Unemployment-to-Population Ratio
The unemployment-to-population ratio shows a clear cyclical
pattern, rising during economic contractions and falling during
expansions. As can be seen from Panel A of Figure 4, the
unemployment-to-population ratio is decreasing with age. The rise in the
unemployment-to-population ratio across age groups from 2007-2010 is
comparable to the increase from 1980-1983, though the increase for the
25-34 age group was more pronounced in the 1980-1983 recession, and the
increases for the 35-44 and 45-54 age groups are more pronounced in the
2007-2009 recession.
The unemployment-to-population ratios for educational attainment
groups are displayed in Figure 4, Panel B, which shows that more years
of schooling are associated with lower unemployment. Figure 4, Panel C
shows the unemployment-to-population ratio by marital status and shows
that single, never married and separated/divorced individuals have
consistently higher unemployment-to-population ratios than those who are
married. Finally, as can be seen from Panel D of Figure 4, the
unemployment-to-population ratio for blacks is consistently higher than
the unemployment-to-population ratio for whites and others. Between 2007
and 2010, the unemployment-to-population ratio for blacks increased by
.08, whereas the ratios of whites and others increased by approximately
.04.
OLF-to-Population Ratio
[FIGURE 4 OMITTED]
Figure 5, Panel A displays the OLF-to-population ratio for each age
group. We note that each time series has a distinct upward trend from
1968-2010, with the upward trend for the 55-64 age group from 1968-1985
being particularly severe. However, the OLF-to-population ratio for the
35-44 age group has been relatively stable since 1994 and that of the
55-64 age group has actually declined moderately since 1994. The most
notable feature of this figure is the disparity between the 55-64 age
group and the other age groups. Historically, the OLF-to-population
ratio of the 55-64 age group has dwarfed that of the younger age groups.
In 2010, the OLF-to-population ratio for the 55-64 age group was .30,
whereas the ratios of the other age groups ranged from .09 to .13. We
also observe that the OLF-to-population ratio of the 45-54 group tends
to be higher than the 25-34 and 35-44 age groups by approximately .02.
[FIGURE 5 OMITTED]
The OLF-to-population ratios for different educational attainment
groups are shown in Panel B of Figure 5. There are upward trends since
1968 for each group, with the largest increases occurring for those with
at most a high school education and those with some college education.
The figure shows that those with a college degree and those with more
than a college education have experienced similar OLF-to-population
ratios across time, though since 2005 these series have diverged, with
the OLF-to-population ratio for those with a college degree continuing
to trend upward while the ratio for those with more than a college
education has fallen. Finally, we observe that fewer years of education
are associated with a larger OLF-to-population ratio: In 2010, the
OLF-to-population ratios were .19, .15, .09, and .07 for those with at
most a high school degree, some college education, a college degree, and
more than a college degree, respectively.
Panel C of Figure 5 gives the OLF-to-population ratio by marital
status. There is a notable upward trend in the OLF-to-population ratio
for each marital status group. Those in the married group have the
lowest OLF-to-population ratio throughout the observation period, while
the separated/divorced and single, never married groups have an
OLF-to-population ratio that is between .05 and .1 higher. The widowed
group has had the highest OLF-to-population ratio historically,
occasionally exceeding .40.
Figure 5, Panel D breaks down the OLF-to-population ratio by race.
The most notable feature of this figure is the large difference in the
growth of the OLF-to-population ratio between blacks and the other
groups. The OLF-to-population ratio for blacks has increased from .09 in
1968 to .24 in 2010, whereas the OLF-to-population ratios for the other
and white groups have increased from .09 and .06 to .15 and .14,
respectively. Thus, while each series has trended upward, that of blacks
has done so more rapidly.
3. ACCOUNTING FOR CHANGES IN AGGREGATE LABOR OUTCOMES
Method
In this subsection we discuss the methods by which we create
counterfactual labor outcomes and decompose the changes in actual labor
market outcomes.
The aggregate share of persons with labor outcome L O, where LO =
{Employed, Unemployed, OLF}, in year t can be described by the following
equation:
[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (1)
where i [member of] A x E x M x R corresponds to a vector of
demographic charac-teristics consisting of age (A), educational
attainment (E), marital status (M), and race (R); [g.sub.i,t] is the
number of persons in group i; L[O.sub.i,t] is the number of persons with
the labor status LO in group i; and pop, is the size of the population.
In essence, we divide the population into mutually exclusive groups
(e.g., married, college-educated white males between the ages of 25-34).
Equation (1) describes the aggregate proportion as the sum of the labor
outcomes by group (the first term in the equation) weighted by the size
of the groups in the population (the second term in the equation). For
example, fixing either term for all i at its 2010 level while allowing
the other to take on historical values allows us to construct
counterfactual aggregate labor outcomes for 2010. By creating and
comparing time series of these counterfactuals, we can observe the
degree to which these two terms are driving changes in aggregate labor
outcomes in 2010.
One concern when creating these counterfactuals is that the
changing sociodemographic composition of the population could affect the
labor outcomes of different groups. Alternatively, changes in the labor
outcomes of a sociodemographic group could change the sociodemographic
composition of the population. For example, if college-educated
individuals are more likely to be employed relative to other educational
attainment subgroups, there will likely be an influx of individuals into
the college-educated demographic group. By simply fixing either of these
terms while varying the other, we do not account for these endogeneity
effects.
To analyze the change in labor outcomes, we perform the following
decomposition:
[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (2)
where [MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII].
The component in the first set of brackets in equation (2) measures
the effect of changes in the labor outcomes of different groups from
year [t.sub.1] to [t.sub.2], given the sociodemographic composition of
the population in year [t.sub.1]. The second term captures the effect of
changes in the sociodemographic composition of the population, given the
labor outcomes of different groups in year [t.sub.2].
Alternatively, we can write
[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (3)
The component in the first set of brackets in equation (3) measures
the effect of changes in the sociodemographic composition of the
population, given the labor outcomes of different groups in year
[t.sub.1]. The second term captures the effect of changes in the labor
outcomes of different groups from year [t.sub.1] to [t.sub.2], given the
sociodemographic composition of the population in year [t.sub.2]. The
difference between these two decompositions is the base year, i.e., the
year at which the component, other than the component of interest, is
held constant. For example, the change as a result of a change in the
labor outcomes of different groups in equation (2) is calculated using
[t.sub.1] as the base year, while in equation (3) it is calculated using
[t.sub.2] as the base year. Because of the endogeneity issues mentioned
above, these two decompositions do not necessarily deliver the same
results. It is also unclear that one is theoretically better than the
other. We perform both decompositions and, despite some small
quantitative differences, find the qualitative conclusions from the two
decompositions to be the same. For this reason, we report only the
results of the decomposition corresponding to equation (2). (3)
Changes in Aggregate Labor Outcomes
Tables 1-3 show the predicted labor outcomes--proportion employed,
unemployed, and OLF, respectively--calculated using the labor outcomes
of different groups from year [t.sub.1] and the demographic composition
of the population from year [t.sub.2], where [t.sub.1],[t.sub.2][member
of][1968, 2010].
The diagonal elements in Tables 1-3 (darkly shaded) show the actual
labor outcomes for their respective year. The off-diagonal elements show
the counterfactual labor outcomes. Thus, for each year we have two sets
of counterfactual predictions. Moving along a row gives the predicted
labor outcome for a fixed demographic composition, while moving down a
column gives the predicted labor outcome for fixed labor outcomes of
different groups. For example, the (1983, 2010) entry of Table 1 gives
the predicted proportion of employed individuals in 2010 given the 1983
demographic composition (77.9 percent), while the (2010, 1983) entry
gives the predicted proportion of employed individuals in 2010 given the
1983 labor outcomes of different groups (78.6 percent).
Table 1 Counterfactual Predictions of the Employment-to-Population
Ratio by Percent, 25-64-Year-Old Males
Dema 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977
graphics
1968 919 917 90.7 89.0 88.7 88.7 88.5 84.5 84.3 85.1
1969 918 919 90.8 89.0 88.8 889 88.6 84.6 84.3 85.2
1970 918 918 90.81 89.0 88.8 88.7 88.6 88.6 84.9 85.2
1971 918 917 90.7 98.1 88.7 88.5 88.5 84.5 84.8 85.2
1972 918 917 90.7 89.0 88.8 88.6 88.5 84.5 84.9 88.2
1973 918 917 90.7 89.1 88.8 88.7 88.6 84.7 84.9 85.4
1974 918 915 90.5 88.9 88.8 88.5 88.8 84.6 84.5 85.2
1975 916 916 90.5 88.7 88.5 88.5 88.4 84.6 84.8 85.2
1976 917 917 90.6 88.9 88.6 88.6 88.5 84.7 84.9 85.3
1977 917 916 90.5 88.8 88.5 88.5 88.5 84.7 84.9 85.4
1978 915 915 90.4 88.8 88.4 88.4 88.3 84.5 84.7 85.2
1979 916 915 90.4 88.7 88.4 88.3 88.4 84.6 84.8 85.5
1980 915 914 90.3 88.6 88.3 88.2 88.3 84.5 84.7 85.5
1981 914 913 90.2 88.5 88.2 88.3 88.2 84.4 84.6 85.2
1982 915 914 90.3 88.5 88.2 88.2 88.2 84.5 84.7 85.2
1983 916 915 90.2 88.6 88.3 88.2 88.3 84.7 84.6 85.3
1984 915 914 90.3 88.6 88.3 88.3 88.2 84.5 84.6 85.3
1985 914 913 90.1 88.5 88.2 88.3 88.1 84.5 84.5 85.3
1986 914 913 90.1 88.4 88.1 88.2 88.1 84.8 84.7 85.2
1987 916 914 90.1 88.4 88.1 88.3 88.2 84.5 84.8 85.3
1988 914 9l3 90.9 88.3 88.0 88.5 88.2 84.5 84.8 85.3
1989 913 913 90.9 88.3 88.0 88.1 88,1 84.5 84.7 85.2
1990 914 913 90.9 88.3 88.0 88.2 88.2 84.5 84.7 85.3
1991 913 912 89.9 88.2 87.9 88.0 88.0 84.5 84.8 85.1
1992 912 912 89.9 88.2 87.9 88.0 88.0 84.6 84.8 85.2
1993 912 912 89.9 88.2 87.9 88.0 88.0 84.7 84.7 85.2
1994 912 912 89.9 88.1 87.9 88.0 88.0 84.8 84.8 85.3
1995 912 913 90.0 88.2 88.0 88.0 88.0 85.0 85.0 85.5
1996 91 911 89.8 88.0 87.9 87.0 87.0 84.7 84.8 85.3
1997 909 91 89.7 87.8 87.9 87.9 87.8 84.6 84.7 85.1
1998 909 911 69.7 87.8 87.7 87.9 87.6 84.6 84.6 85.2
1999 908 91 89.7 87.9 87.7 87.9 87.7 84.7 84.6 85.2
2000 909 911 89.6 87.9 87.8 87.8 87.6 84.5 84.6 85.2
2001 906 909 89.5 87.9 87.6 87.8 87.6 84.5 84.4 85.0
2002 905 903 89.3 87.9 87.5 87.9 87.4 84.5 84.0 84.8
2003 903 903 89.0 87.4 87.2 87.4 87.2 84.2 83.8 84.7
2004 903 905 88.9 87.2 87.1 87.3 87.0 84.0 83.8 84.5
2005 90 903 88.6 88.6 88.9 87.1 86.8 87.0 83.5 84.2
2006 89.9 903 88.5 88.9 88.7 88.9 88.6 86.8 83.3 84.0
2007 69.9 903 88.4 88.9 88.3 88.8 86.7 86.6 83.4 84.0
2008 69.6 89.9 88.2 86.6 88.4 86.3 86.3 86.7 83.0 83.7
2009 693 89.7 88.0 86.3 86.1 88.4 86.1 86.3 82.8 83.6
2010 99.1 89.4 87.9 86.1 85.1 88.2 85.8 86.1 83.8 83.3
919 919 90.0 89.1 88.8 88.7 88.8 84.8 84.9 85.4
Dema 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987
graphics
1968 85.9 86.4 85.2 83.8 817 79.5 819 82.4 82.0 82.5
1969 85.9 88.4 85.3 83.9 818 79.6 82.0 82.5 82.1 82.6
1970 85.9 86.4 85.3 83.9 818 79.6 82.0 82.5 82.1 82.7
1971 85.9 86.4 85.3 83.9 818 79.6 82.0 82.5 82.1 82.7
1972 85.9 86.4 85.3 84.0 818 79.7 82.0 82.5 82.2 82.7
1973 86.1 86.5 85.4 84.1 82.0 78.8 82.2 82.8 82.4 82.9
1974 86.0 86.4 85.4 84.0 819 79.7 82.1 82.7 82.3 82.8
1975 86.0 86.5 85.4 84.1 818 79.8 82.2 82.7 82.4 82.8
1976 86.1 85.5 85.5 84.3 82.1 80.0 82.4 82.9 82.6 83.1
1977 86.2 86.5 85.5 84.3 82.1 80.0 82.4 83.0 82.6 83.1
1978 86.1 86.5 85.4 84.2 82.1 80.0 82.3 82.9 82.5 83.0
1979 86.2 86.6 85.5 84.3 82.1 80.0 82.4 82.9 82.6 83.1
1980 86.1 86.6 85.5 84.3 82.1 80.0 82.4 83.0 82.6 83.1
1981 86.1 86.5 85.5 84.2 82.0 79.9 82.3 82.9 82.6 83.1
1982 86.1 86.6 85.5 84.3 82.2 80.0 82.5 83.0 82.7 83.2
1983 86.2 86.7 85.6 84.4 82.3 80.1 82.6 83.2 82.9 83.3
1984 86.2 86.7 85.6 84.3 82.2 80.1 82.6 83.1 82.8 83.3
1985 86.2 86.7 85.5 84.3 822 80.1 82.6 83.1 82.8 83.3
1986 86.1 86.7 85.5 84.3 82.2 80.1 82.6 83.1 82.9 83.3
1987 86.2 86.8 85.7 84.4 82.4 80.2 82.7 83.2 83.0 83.5
1988 86.2 86.8 85.6 84.4 82.3 80.1 82.6 83.2 82.9 83.4
1989 88.2 88.8 85.7 84.4 82.4 80.2 82.7 83.3 83.0 83.4
1990 88.3 88.8 85.7 84.4 82.4 80.2 82.8 83.3 83.0 83.5
1991 86.3 86.9 85.8 84.2 82.2 80.0 82.8 83.1 83.1 8.33
1992 86.3 88.7 85.7 84.4 82.4 80.2 82.8 83.2 83.2 83.5
1993 85.9 86.9 85.9 84.4 82.5 80.3 83.0 83.3 83.0 83.5
1994 85.4 85.9 85.9 84.5 82.5 80.3 83.1 83.3 83.0 83.5
1995 85.6 87.0 86.0 84.6 82.7 80.5 83.1 83.5 83.2 83.7
1996 85.4 87.2 85.8 84.5 82.6 804 82.9 83.3 83.1 83.5
1997 86.3 85.0 85.7 84.4 82.5 80.3 82.5 83.2 83.0 83.4
1998 86.3 85.8 85.7 84.4 82.5 80.3 82.0 83.2 83.0 83.3
1999 86.3 86.9 85.8 84.4 82.6 80.3 83.0 83.2 82.9 83.4
2000 86.5 87.0 85.9 84.5 82.8 80.5 83.1 83.2 83.0 83.5
2001 86.3 86.7 85.7 84.4 82.5 80.4 82.9 83.1 82.9 83.3
2002 86.1 86.6 85.5 84.1 82.3 80.2 82.5 82.9 82.7 83.1
2003 85.9 86.4 85.4 84.0 82.2 80.0 82.4 82.6 82.5 82.8
2004 85.7 88.2 85.3 83.8 82.0 79.7 82.1 82.4 82.2 82.6
2005 85.5 88.0 85.0 83.5 817 79.5 819 82.2 819 82.3
2006 85.3 85.5 84.8 83.2 816 79.3 816 819 817 82.2
2007 85.3 85.5 84.8 83.3 816 79.3 816 819 816 82.1
2008 85.9 85.5 84.6 83.0 813 79.1 813 816 813 818
2009 84.9 85.4 84.4 82.8 812 76.9 811 815 812 818
2010 84.6 85.1 84.1 82.5 80.9 78.6 80.8 812 80.9 814
86.1 86.6 85.5 84.2 82.2 80.2 82.6 83.1 82.9 83.5
Dema 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997
graphics
1968 83.3 83.7 83.3 816 80.5 80.5 79.9 812 817 82.4
1969 83.4 83.7 83.3 818 80.6 80.6 80.1 813 818 82.5
1970 83.4 83.8 83.3 818 80.6 80.6 80.1 814 818 82.5
1971 83.4 83.8 83.4 818 80.7 80.6 80.1 814 819 82.6
1972 83.5 83.8 83.4 819 80.7 80.7 80.2 815 819 82.6
1973 83.7 84.0 83.6 82.0 80.9 80.9 80.4 817 82.1 82.8
1974 83.6 83.9 83.5 819 80.8 80.8 80.4 818 82.0 82.8
1975 83.6 83.9 83.5 82.0 80.9 80.9 80.4 818 82.0 82.8
1976 83.8 84.1 83.7 82.2 811 811 80.6 815 82.2 83.0
1977 83.8 84.1 83.8 82.2 812 812 80.7 818 82.4 83.1
1978 83.7 84.0 83.7 82.1 811 811 80.7 819 82.3 83.0
1979 83.7 84.1 83.8 82.3 813 812 80.8 819 82.4 83.1
1980 83.8 84.1 83.9 82.3 813 812 80.9 82.0 82.4 83.2
1981 83.7 84.2 83.9 82.3 813 812 80.8 82.1 82.4 83.2
1982 83.8 84.2 84.0 82.3 814 814 810 82.1 82.5 83.3
1983 84.0 84.4 84.2 82.5 816 815 811 82.4 82.7 83.5
1984 84.0 84.3 84.2 82.5 816 815 811 82.4 82.7 83.4
1985 83.9 84.3 84.2 82.5 816 815 811 82.4 82.7 83.4
1986 83.9 84.4 84.2 82.5 816 815 812 82.5 82.7 83.4
1987 84.1 84.5 84.4 82.7 818 817 814 82.6 82.9 83.5
1988 84.0 84.4 84.4 82.6 817 815 813 82.5 82.8 83.5
1989 84.1 84.8 84.4 82.7 819 816 814 82.7 82.8 83.5
1990 84.1 84.6 84.5 82.8 82.0 817 815 82.7 82.9 83.6
1991 33.8 84.3 84.3 82.9 82.1 815 813 82.5 82.6 83.4
1992 84.0 84.6 84.5 82.9 82.3 819 815 82.7 82.8 83.6
1993 84.0 84.6 84.6 83.0 82.1 B16 815 82.7 82.3 83.6
1994 84.1 84.7 84.8 83.2 82.1 817 816 82.8 82.8 83.7
1995 84.2 84.8 84.6 83.1 025 819 818 83.0 83.0 83.6
1996 84.0 84.7 84.5 83.0 82.1 617 818 82.71 82.8 83.5
1997 83.9 84.5 84.4 82.9 82.0 919 815 82.6 82.7 83.5
1998 83.8 84.5 84.4 82.8 819 819 814 82.5 82.8 83.6
1999 83.8 84.5 84.5 82.5 819 B14 814 82.5 82.8 83.4
2000 83.0 84.5 84.5 83.0 82.1 816 815 82.6 82.6 83.1
2001 83.7 84.4 84.3 82.9 819 813 813 82.4 82.2 83.4
2002 83.5 84.1 84.0 82.8 817 80 811 82.1 82.0 83.1
2003 83.3 83.9 83.9 82.5 816 609 80.8 82.0 82.0 83.0
2004 83.0 83.7 83.7 82.2 813 607 80.7 818 817 82.8
2005 82.7 63.4 83.3 82.0 811 604 80.4 814 814 82.4
2006 82.5 83.1 83.1 818 80.9 602 80.1 812 812 82.2
2007 82.5 83.1 83.1 817 80.8 602 80.1 812 812 82.1
2008 82.2 82.8 82.8 814 80.5 799 79.8 80.9 80.8 818
2009 82.0 82.6 82.6 813 80.4 79.7 79.7 80.7 80.7 817
2010 817 82.4 82.3 810 80.1 794 79.3 80.4 80.3 814
84.0 84.6 54.5 82.6 819 816 816 83.0 82.3 83.6
Dema 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
graphics
1968 83.0 83.4 83.3 82.8 812 811 813 810 82.7 82.3
1969 83.1 83.4 83.4 82.9 813 812 814 82.1 82.8 82.5
1970 83.1 83.5 83.4 82.9 814 812 814 82.1 82.8 82.6
1971 83.2 83.5 83.5 82.9 814 812 814 82.1 82.8 82.6
1972 83.2 83.5 83.5 83.0 815 813 815 82.1 82.9 8207
1973 83.4 83.6 83.7 83.2 8l6 814 817 82.3 83.0 82.9
1974 83.3 83.6 836 83.1 816 813 816 82.2 82.9 82.8
1975 83.4 83.7 83.7 83.2 817 814 818 82.2 83.0 82.9
1976 83.6 83.9 83.9 83.3 819 816 818 82.4 83.2 83.1
1977 83.7 83.9 84.0 83.4 819 816 817 82.5 83.2 83.1
1978 83.6 83.9 83.9 83.3 819 815 818 82.4 83.1 83.1
1979 83.7 84.0 84.0 83.5 82.0 816 818 82.5 83.2 83.2
1980 83.6 84.0 84.0 83.5 82.0 817 818 82.5 83.3 83.2
1981 83.6 84.0 84.1 83.6 82.0 817 815 82.6 83.3 83.3
1982 83.9 84.2 84.3 83.7 82.2 818 82.0 82.8 83.4 83.4
1983 84.1 84.3 84.4 83.8 82.3 819 82.0 82.8 83.5 83.6
1984 84.1 84.3 84.4 83.9 82.3 819 82.0 82.7 83.5 83.6
1985 84.1 84.3 84.4 83.8 82.3 819 82.0 82.7 83.5 83.6
1986 84.1 84.3 84.4 83.8 82.3 82.1 829 82.8 835 83.6
1987 84.3 84.5 84.7 84.1 82.5 82.0 82.2 82.9 83.7 83.5
1988 84.2 84.4 84.6 84.0 82.6 82.1 82.1 82.8 83.6 83.6
1989 84.3 84.5 84.6 84.1 82.4 82.1 82.1 82.9 83.7 83.7
1990 84.4 84.5 84.7 84.2 82.6 82.3 82.2 83.0 83.7 83.8
1991 84.2 84.3 84.5 84.0 82.4 82.1 819 82.8 83.5 83.6
1992 84.3 84.5 84.7 84.2 82.6 819 82.1 82.9 83.6 83.8
1993 84.3 84.5 84.7 84.2 82.6 82.1 82.1 82.9 83.6 839
1994 84.4 84.6 81.8 84.3 82.7 82.1 82.1 83.0 83.7 83.9
1995 84.5 84.6 84.9 84.5 82.5 82.1 82.3 83.2 83.9 84.1
1996 84.3 84.6 84.7 84.3 82.7 82.1 82.1 83.3 83.7 83.9
1997 84.3 84.4 84.8 84.2 82.6 819 819 82.9 83.6 83.8
1998 84.2 84.4 84.5 84.1 82.5 819 819 82.8 83.4 83.7
1999 84.1 84.4 84.5 84.1 82.5 819 819 82.8 83.2 83.7
2000 84.2 84.4 84.6 84.1 82.6 819 82.0 82.9 83.0 83.8
2001 84.0 84.2 84.3 84.0 82.4 818 818 82.8 83.8 83.8
2002 83.8 84.0 84.1 83.7 82.2 815 816 82.5 82.5 83.4
2003 83.6 83.8 83.9 83.5 82.0 814 815 82.4 82.3 83.2
2004 83.4 83.6 83.7 83.3 818 812 812 82.2 82.8 82.3
2005 83.1 83.4 83.5 83.1 816 80.9 810 819 82.5 82.0
2006 82.9 83.1 83.2 82.8 813 80.7 80.8 817 82.3 82.8
2007 82.8 83.1 83.2 82.7 813 80.6 80.8 817 82.3 82.8
2008 82.6 8.28 82.9 82.5 816 80.3 80.5 815 82.0 82.3
2009 82.4 82.7 82.7 82.3 80.9 80.2 80.3 813 819 82.1
2010 82.1 82.4 82.4 82.1 80.5 79.9 80.0 810 815 818
84.2 84.5 84.6 84.0 82.2 814 812 819 82.3 8.25
Dema 2008 2009 2010
graphics
1968 816 772 76.9
1969 818 773 77.9
1970 818 774 77.1
1971 818 774 77.1
1972 819 774 77.2
1973 82.0 776 77.3
1974 82.0 778 77.3
1975 82.0 778 77.4
1976 82.2 776 77.8
1977 82.3 779 77.7
1978 82.2 773 77.8
1979 82.3 789 77.9
1980 82.4 785 77.9
1981 82.3 779 77.9
1982 82.4 789 77.9
1983 82.6 782 77.9
1984 82.6 782 773
1985 82.6 782 77.9
1986 82.6 782 78.0
1987 82.6 783 78.0
1988 82.6 782 77.8
1989 82.6 783 77.9
1990 82.8 783 78.0
1991 82.8 78.1 78.1
1992 82.8 783 78.3
1993 82.9 78.4 769
1994 83.0 78.5 78.1
1995 83.2 76.7 78.3
1996 83.0 78.5 78.1
1997 82.9 78.4 769
1998 82.9 78.4 78.0
1999 82.9 78.5 78.1
2000 83.0 78.8 78.2
2001 82.5 78.4 78.1
2002 82.6 78.2 77.9
2003 82.5 78.1 77.7
2004 82.5 78.0 77.6
2005 82.1 77.7 77.3
2006 819 77.4 77.1
2007 818 77.4 77.1
2008 816 77.2 76.8
2009 814 77.0 76.6
2010 811 76.7 76.3
816 77.0 76.3
Notes: Authors' own calculations from the IPUMS-CPS data. The columns
correspond to the year of the labor outcomes used. The rows correspond
to the year of the sociodemographic composition used. Lightly shaded
columns correspond to the NBER-dated contractions (from peak to trough).
Darkly shaded elements correspond to actual values for given year.
Table 2 Counterfactual Predictions of the Unemployment-to-Population
Ratio by Percent, 25-64-Year-Old Males
Oemooiaciliica 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976
1968 2.1 17 2.7 3.8 3.5 3.0 2.9 6.0 4.9
1969 2.0 17 2.7 3.8 3.5 3.0 2.9 6,0 4.8
1970 2.0 17 2.7 3.8 3.5 3.0 2.9 6.0 4.9
1971 2.0 17 2.7 3.8 3.5 3.0 2.9 6.0 4.9
1972 2.0 17 2.7 3.9 3.5 3.0 2.9 6.0 4.9
1973 2.0 17 2.7 3.8 3.5 3.0 2.9 5.9 4.9
1974 2.0 17 2.7 3.0 3.6 3.0 2.9 5.9 4.9
1975 2.0 17 2,7 3.0 3.6 3.0 2.9 5.9 4.9
1976 2.0 17 2.7 3.0 3.6 3.1 2.9 5.9 4.9
1977 2.0 17 2.7 3,0 3.6 3.1 3.0 5.9 4.9
1978 2.0 17 2.7 4.0 3.6 3.1 3.0 5.9 4.9
1979 2.0 17 2.7 4.0 3.6 3.1 3.0 5.9 5.0
1980 2.0 17 2.7 4.0 3.6 3.1 3.0 5.9 5.0
1981 2.1 17 2.8 4.1 3.7 3.2 3.1 6.0 5.1
1982 2.1 17 2.8 4.1 3.7 3.2 3.1 6.1 5.1
1983 2.1 17 2.8 4.1 3.7 3.2 3.2 6.0 5.1
1984 2.1 17 2.8 4.1 3.8 3.2 3.1 6.1 5.1
1985 2.1 17 2.8 4,1 3.8 3.2 3.2 6.1 5.2
1986 2.1 17 2.8 4.2 3.8 3.3 3.2 6.1 5.2
1987 2.1 18 2.8 4.2 3.9 3.3 3.3 6.1 5.2
1988 2.2 18 3.0 4.2 3.9 3.3 3.3 6.2 5.3
1989 2.2 17 3.0 4.2 3.8 3.3 3.3 6.1 5.2
1990 2.2 17 3.0 4.3 3.9 3.3 3.3 6.1 5.2
1991 2.3 18 3.0 4.3 3.9 3.3 3.3 6.2 5.3
1992 2.3 17 3.0 4.3 3.9 3.3 3.3 6.1 5.3
1993 2.2 17 3.0 43 3.9 3.3 3.3 6.0 5.3
1994 2.3 17 3.0 43 3.9 3.3 3.3 6.0 5.2
1995 2.2 17 3.0 4.3 3.9 3.2 3.3 5.9 5.1
1996 23 17 3.0 4.3 3..9 3.3 3.3 5.9 5.2
1997 2.3 17 3.0 4.3 3.9 3.2 3.3 5.8 5.1
1998 2.3 17 3.0 4.3 3.0 3.2 3.3 5.8 5.1
1999 2.3 17 3.0 4.2 3.9 3.2 3.3 5.7 5.0
2000 2.2 17 3.0 4.1 3.9 3.1 3.3 5.7 5.0
2001 2.2 17 3.0 4.2 3.9 3.1 3.2 5.5 5.0
2002 2.2 17 3.0 4.3 3.9 3.1 3.3 5.6 5.0
2003 2.2 17 3.0 4.3 3.9 3.1 3.3 5.5 5.0
2004 2.2 17 3.0 4.3 3.9 3.1 3.3 5.6 5.0
2005 22 17 3.0 4.3 4.0 3.1 3.3 5.6 5.0
2006 2.2 17 3.0 4.4 3.9 3.1 3.3 5.6 5.0
2007 2.2 16 3.0 4.4 4.0 3.1 3.3 5.6 4.5
2008 2.2 17 3.1 4.4 4.0 3.1 3.3 5.5 5.0
2009 2.2 17 3.1 4.4 4.0 3.1 3.4 5.5 5.0
2010 2.2 17 3.1 4.4 4.0 3.2 3.4 5.6 5.1
2.1 17 2.7 3.8 3.5 3.0 2.9 5.9 4.9
Oemooiaciliica 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985
1968 4.6 3.7 3.5 4.3 5.2 6.9 8.8 6.1 5.3
1969 4.6 3.7 3.4 4.2 5.2 6.8 8.7 6.1 5.3
1970 4.6 3.7 3.4 4.3 5.1 6.8 8.7 5.0 5.3
1971 4.7 3.7 3.5 4.2 5.2 6.8 8.7 5.0 5.3
1972 4.6 3.7 3.4 4.2 5.1 6.8 8.7 5.0 5.2
1973 4.6 3.7 3.4 4.2 5.1 6.8 8.7 5.9 5.2
1974 4.7 3.7 3.4 4.2 5.1 6.8 8.6 5.9 5.2
1975 4.7 3.7 3.4 4.2 5.0 6.8 8.6 5.9 5.2
1976 4..7 3.7 3.4 4.2 5.0 6.7 8.5 5.9 5.2
1977 4.7 3.7 3.4 4.2 5.0 6.7 8.5 5.9 5.2
1978 4.7 3.7 3.4 4.2 5.0 5.7 8.5 5.9 5.2
1979 4.6 3.7 3.4 4.2 5.0 6.8 8.6 5.9 5.2
1980 4.9 3.7 3.5 4.3 5.1 6.8 8.7 5.9 5.2
1981 5.0 3.8 3.6 4.4 5.2 7.0 8.8 6.0 5.3
1982 5.0 3.8 3.6 4.4 5.2 7.1 8.7 6.1 5.3
1983 5.0 3.8 3.6 4.4 5.2 7.0 8.8 6.1 5.3
1984 5.1 3.9 3.6 4.4 5.3 7.1 8.8 6.1 5.4
1985 5.1 3.9 3.6 4.4 5.3 7.1 8.9 6.1 5.4
1986 5.2 4.0 3.6 4.5 5.3 7.2 8.9 6.2 5.5
1987 5.2 4.0 3.6 4.5 5.3 7.2 8.0 6.2 5.5
1988 5.3 4.0 3.7 4.5 5.4 7.3 8.9 6.2 5.8
1989 5.3 4.0 3.7 4.5 5.4 7.3 8.9 6.2 5.5
1990 5.3 4.0 3.7 4.5 5.4 7.3 8.0 6.2 5.5
1991 5.3 4.0 3.7 4.5 5.4 7.4 8.9 6.3 5.6
1992 5.2 4.0 3.6 4.5 5.3 7.3 8.8 6.2 5.6
1993 5.2 3.9 3.6 4.4 5.2 7.2 8.8 5.1 5.5
1994 5.2 3.9 3.6 4.4 5.3 7.2 8.7 5.1 5.6
1995 5.1 3.9 3.6 4.4 5.2 7.2 8.7 5.1 5.5
1996 5.2 3.9 3.6 4.4 5.2 7.2 8.7 5.1 5.5
1997 5.1 3.9 3.5 4.4 5.2 7.2 8.7 6.1 5.5
1998 5.1 3.8 3.5 4.3 5.1 7.1 8.6 6.0 5.4
1999 5.0 3.8 3.5 4.2 5.0 7.0 8.5 5.9 5.4
2000 4.9 3.7 3.5 4.2 4.9 6.9 8.4 5.9 5.4
2001 4.9 3.7 3.5 4.2 4.9 6.8 8.4 5.8 5.3
2002 4.9 3.7 3.5 4.2 4.9 6.8 8.3 5.8 5.3
2003 4.9 3.8 3.5 4.1 4.0 6.9 8.3 5.8 5.4
2004 4.9 3.8 3.5 4.1 4.0 6.8 8.3 5.9 5.3
2005 5.0 3.8 3.5 4.1 4.9 6.8 8.4 5.9 5.4
2006 5.0 3.8 3.5 4.1 4.9 6.8 8.4 5.9 5.4
2007 5.0 3.8 3.5 4.1 4.8 6.8 8.3 5.9 5.4
2008 5.0 3.8 3.6 4.1 4.8 6.8 8.3 5.8 5.4
2009 5.0 3.8 3.6 4.1 4.8 6.8 8.3 5.9 5.4
2010 5.1 3.9 3.6 4.1 4.8 6.8 8.3 5.9 5.4
4.7 3.7 3.4 4.3 5.2 7.1 8.7 5.1 5.4
Labor Outcomos
Oemooiaciliica 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993
1968 5.5 5.2 4.5 3.9 4.0 5.7 6.5 6.2
1969 5.5 5.1 4.4 3.9 4.0 5.6 6.5 6.2
1970 5.5 5.1 4.4 3.9 4.0 5.6 6.5 6.2
1971 5.5 5.1 4.4 3.0 4.0 5.7 6.5 6.2
1972 5.4 5.1 4.4 3.9 4.0 5.6 6.4 6.1
1973 5.4 5.1 4.4 3.9 4.0 5.6 6.4 6.1
1974 5.4 5.0 4.4 3.9 4.0 5.6 6.4 6.1
1975 5.3 5.0 4.3 3.8 3.9 5.6 6.4 6.1
1976 5.3 5.0 4.3 3.8 3.9 5.5 6.3 6.1
1977 5.3 5.0 4.3 3.8 3.9 5.5 6.3 6.0
1978 5.3 5.0 4.3 3.9 3.9 5.5 6.3 6.0
1979 5.3 5.0 4.3 3.9 3.9 5.5 6.3 6.1
1980 5.3 5.1 4.3 3.9 4.0 5.6 5.4 6.1
1981 5.4 5.1 4.4 4,0 4.1 5.7 5.4 6.2
1982 5.4 5.2 4.4 4.0 4.1 5.7 5.4 6.2
1983 5.4 5.2 4.4 4.0 4.1 5.7 5.4 6.2
1984 5.5 5.2 4.5 4.1 4.1 5.8 6.5 6.3
1985 5.5 5.2 4.5 4.1 4.1 5.6 6.5 6.3
1986 5.5 5.3 4.6 4.1 4.2 5.8 6.5 6.3
1987 5.5 5.3| 4.6 4.1 4.2 5.9 6.6 6.4
1988 5.6 5.4 4.6 4.2 4.2 5.9 8.6 6.4
1989 5.6 5.4 4.6 4.2 4.2 5.9 6.6 6.4
1990 5.6 5.4 4.6 4.2 4.2 6.0 6.6 6.5
1991 5.7 5.5 4.7 4.3 43 5.9 6.7 6.5
1992 5.6 5.4 4.7 4.2 4.3 5.9 6.7 6.5
1993 5.5 5.4 4.6 4.2 4.2 5.9 6.6 6.5
1994 5.6 5.5 4.6 4.2 4.2 5.9 6.6 6.5
1995 5.5 5.4 4.6 4.2 4.2 5.9 6.5 6.5
1996 5.5 5.4 4.6 4.2 4.2 5.9 6.6 6.5
1997 5.5 5.4 4.6 4.2 4.2 5.8 6.5 6.5
1998 5.5 5.4 4.6 4.1 4.2 5.8 6.6 6.5
1999 5.4 5.3 4.5 4.1 4.1 5.8 6.5 6.4
2000 5.4 5.3 4.5 4.1 4.1 5.7 6.4 6.4
2001 5.4 5.3 4.5 4.0 4.1 5.7 6.4 6.3
2002 5.4 5.3 4.5 4.0 4.0 5.7 6.4 6.3
2003 5.3 5.3 4.5 4.0 4.1 5.7 6.4 6.3
2004 5.3 53 4.5 4.0 4.1 5.7 6.4 6.3
2005 5.4 53 4.6 4.1 4.1 5.7 6.5 6.4
2006 5.4 5.3 4.6 4.1 4.1 5.7 6.5 6.4
2007 5.4 5.3 4.6 4.1 4.0 5.7 6.5 6.4
2008 5.3 53 4.5 4.1 4.0 5.7 6.5 6.3
2009 5.4 5.3 4.6 4.0 4.1 5.7 6.5 6.4
2010 5.4 5.3 4.6 4.0 4.1 5.7 6.5 6.4
Actual
5.5 5.3 46 4.2 4.2 6.0 6.7 6.5
Oemooiaciliica 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
1968 5.1 4.2 4.5 3.8 3.5 3.0 2.8 3.3 4.8
1969 5.1 4.2 4.4 3.8 3.5 3.0 2.8 3.3 4.8
1970 5.1 4.1 4.4 3.8 3.5 3.0 2.7 3.3 4.8
1971 5.1 4.2 4.4 3.8 3.5 3.0 2.7 3.3 4.8
1972 5.1 4.1 4,4 3.8 3.5 3.0 2.7 3.3 4.8
1973 5.0 4,1 4.4 3.8 3.5 3.0 2.7 3.2 4.8
1974 5.0 4.1 4.4 3.8 3.5 3.0 2.7 3.3 4.8
1975 5.0 4.1 4.4 3.8 3.4 2.9 2.7 3.2 4.7
1976 5.0 4.1 4.4 3.8 3.4 2.9 2.7 3.2 4.7
1977 5.0 4.1 4.3 3.8 3.4 2.9 2.7 3.2 4.7
1978 5.0 4.1 4.4 3.8 3.4 2.9 2.8 3.2 4.7
1979 5.0 4.1 4.4 3.8 3.4 2.9 2.8 3.2 4.7
1980 5.0 4.1 4.4 3.8 3.4 2.9 2.8 3.3 4.7
1981 5.1 4.2 4.5 3.8 3.5 3.0 2.9 3.3 4.8
1982 5.1 4.2 4.5 3.9 3.5 3.0 2.9 3.3 4.9
1983 5.1 4.2 4.5 3.9 3.5 3.0 2.9 3.3 4.9
1984 5.2 4.3 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.9 3.3 4.9
1985 5.2 4.3 4.6 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.9 3.4 4.9
1986 5.2 4.3 4.6 4.1 3.6 3.1 3.0 3.4 5.0
1987 5.3 4.3 4.6 4.1 3.6 3.1 3.0 3.4 5.0
1988 5.3 4.4 4.6 4.1 3.6 3.1 3.0 3.4 5.0
1989 5.3 4.4 4.7 4.1 3.7 3.1 3.0 3.4 5.0
1990 5.3 4.4 4.7 4.2 3.7 3.1 3.0 3.4 5.0
1991 5.4 4.3 4.7 4.2 3.7 3.2 3.1 3.4 5.0
1992 5.3 4.4 4.7 4.2 3.7 3.1 3.0 3.4 5.0
1993 5.3 4.4 4.6 4.1 3.8 3.1 3.0 3.4 4.9
1994 5.4 4.4 4.7 4.2 3.7 3.2 3.0 3.4 4.9
1995 5.3 4.4 4.6 4.1 3,7 3.1 3.0 3.4 4.9
1996 5.3 4.5 4.7 4.1 3.7 3.1 3.0 3.4 4.9
1997 5.3 4.4 4.6 4.1 _3.6 3.1 3.0 3.4 4.9
1998 5.3 4.4 4.6 4.1 3.6 3.1 3.0 3.4 4.9
1999 5.3 4.4 4.6 4.1 3.6 3.1 3.0 3.4 4.9
2000 5.2 4.4 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.1 2.9 3.3 4.9
2001 5.2 4.3 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.1 2.9 3.3 4.8
2002 5.2 4.4 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.1 2.9 3.3 4.8
2003 5.2 4.4 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.1 2.9 3.3 4.7
2004 5.2 4.4 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.1 3.0 3.3 4.8
2005 5.2 4.4 4.5 4.1 3.6 3.1 3.0 3.4 4.8
2006 5.2 4.4 4.5 4.1 3.6 3.1 3.0 3.4 4.8
2007 52 4.4 4.5 4.0 3.6 3.1 3.0 3.3 4.7
2008 5.2 4.4 4.5 4.0 3.6 3.1 3.0 3.4 4.7
2009 5.2 4.4 4.5 4.9 3.6 3.1 3.0 3.4 4.7
2010 5.2 4.4 4.5 4.9 3.6 3.1 3.0 3.4 4.8
5.4 4.4 4.5 4.1 3.6 3.1 2.9 3.3 4.8
Oemooiaciliica 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
1968 4.7 4.3 3.9 3.3 3.5 4.3 8.2 9.1
1969 4.7 4.3 3.9 3.3 3.5 4.3 8.2 9.0
1970 4.7 4.3 3.9 3.3 3.5 4.3 8.1 9.0
1971 4.7 4.3 3.9 3.3 3.5 4.3 8.1 9.0
1972 4.7 4.3 3.9 3.3 3.5 4.2 8.1 9.0
1973 4.6 4.2 3.9 3.2 3.5 4.2 8.1 8.9
1974 4.6 4.3 3.9 3.3 3.5 4.2 8.1 8.9
1975 4.6 4.2 3.9 3.3 3.5 4.2 8,1 8.8
1976 4.6 4.3 3.8 3.3 3.5 4.1 8.0 8.8
1977 4.6 4.3 3.8 3.3 3.5 4,1 8.0 8.7
1978 4.6 4.3 3.8 3.3 3.5 4.1 8.0 8.7
1979 4.7 4.3 3.8 3.3 3.5 4.1 8.0 8.7
1980 4.7 4.4 39 3.3 3.5 4.2 8.0 8.8
1981 4.8 4.4 4.0 3.4 3.6 4.3 8.2 8.9
1982 4.8 4.5 4.0 3.4 3.6 4.3 8.2 8.9
1983 4.8 4.5 4,0 3.4 3.6 43 8.1 8.9
1984 4.8 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.6 4.3 8.2 9.1
1985 4.8 4.6 4.0 3.5 3.6 4.3 8.2 9.1
1986 4.9 4.6 4.1 3.5 3.7 4.4 8.3 9.1
1987 4.9 4.6 4.1 3.5 3.7 4.4 8.3 9.1
1988 4.9 4,7 4.1 3.5 3.7 4.4 8.4 0.1
1989 4.9 4.7 4.1 3.6 3.7 4.4 8.4 9.1
1990 5.0 4.7 4.1 3.6 3.7 4.4 8.4 9.2
1991 5.0 4.8 4.1 3.7 3.8 4.5 8.5 9.3
1992 5.0 4.8 4.1 3.7 3.8 4.4 8.4 9.2
1993 5.0 4.8 4.1 3.7 3.7 4.3 8.3 9.1
1994 5.1 4.8 4.1 3.7 3.7 4.4 8.4 9.2
1995 5.1 4.8 4,1 3.7 3.7 4.3 8.3 9.1
1996 5.1 4.8 4,1 3.7 3.7 4.3 8.3 9.1
1997 5.1 4.8 4.1 3.7 3.7 4.3 8.3 9.1
1998 5.1 4.7 4.1 3.7 3.7 4.3 8.3 9.1
1999 5.0 4.7 4.1 3.7 3.7 4.2 8.2 9.0
2000 5.0 4.7 4.0 3.8 3.7 4.2 8.1 8.9
2001 5.0 4.6 4.0 3.6 35 4.2 8.1 8.9
2002 5.0 4.7 4.0 3.7 3.7 4.2 0.1 8.9
2003 5.0 4.7 4.0 3.7 3.7 4.2 8.1 8.9
2004 5.0 4.7 4.0 3.7 3.7 4.2 8.1 8.9
2005 5.0 47 4.0 3.7 3.7 4.2 8.1 8.9
2006 5.0 4.7 4.0 3.7 3.7 4.2 8.1 8.9
2007 5.0 4.7 4.0 3.7 3.7 4.2 81 8.9
2008 5.0 4.7 4.0 3.7 3.7 4.2 8.1 8.9
2009 5.0 4.7 4.0 3.7 3.7 4.2 8.1 8.9
2010 5.0 4.7 4.1 3.7 3.8 4.2 8.1 8.9
5.0 4.7 4.0 3.7 3.7 42 8.1 8.9
Notes: Authors' own calculations froms the IPUMS-CPS data. The
columns correspond to the year of the labor outcomes used. The
rows correspond to the tear of the sociodemographic composition
used. Lightly shaded columns correspond to the NBER-dated
contractions (from peak to trough). Darkly shaded elements
correspond to actual values for given year.
Table 3 Counterfactual Predictions of the OLF-to-Population Ratio
by Percent, 25-64-Year-Old Males
Demo 1968 1968 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977
graphics
1968 2.1 17 2.7 3.8 3.5 3.0 2.9 6.0 4.9 4.6
1969 2.0 17 2.7 3.8 3.5 3.0 2.9 6.0 4.8 4.6
1970 2.0 17 2.7 3.8 3.5 3.0 2.9 6.0 4.9 4.6
1971 2.0 17 2.7 3.8 3.5 3.0 2.9 6.0 4.9 4.7
1972 2.0 17 2.7 3.9 3.5 3.0 2.9 6.0 4.9 4.6
1973 2.0 17 2.7 3.8 3.5 3.0 2.9 5.9 4.9 4.6
1974 2.0 17 2.7 3.9 3.6 3.0 2.9 5.9 4.9 4.7
1975 2.0 17 2.7 3.9 3.6 3.0 2.9 5.9 4.9 4.7
1976 2.0 17 2.7 3.9 3.6 3.1 2.9 5.9 4.9 4.7
1977 2.0 17 2.7 3.9 3.6 3.1 3.0 5.9 4.9 4.7
1978 2.0 17 2.7 4.0 3.6 3.1 3.0 5.9 4.9 4.7
1979 2.0 17 2.7 4.0 3.6 3.1 3.0 5.9 5.0 4.8
1980 2.0 17 2.7 4.0 3.6 3.1 3.0 5.9 5.0 4.9
1981 2.1 17 2.9 4.1 3.7 3.2 3.1 6.0 5.1 5.0
1982 2.1 17 2.9 4.1 3.7 3.2 3.1 6.1 5.1 5.0
1983 2,1 17 2.9 4.1 3.7 3.2 3.2 6.0 5.1 5.0
1984 2.1 17 2.9 4.1 3.8 3.2 3.1 6.1 5.1 5.1
1985 2.1 17 2.9 4.1 3.8 3.2 3.2 6.1 5.2 5.1
1986 2.1 17 2.9 4.2 3.8 3.3 3.2 6.1 5.2 5.2
1987 2,1 18 2.9 4.2 3.9 3.3 3.2 6.1 5.2 5.2
1988 2.2 18 3.0 4.2 3.9 3.3 3.3 6.2 5.2 5.3
1989 2.2 17 3.0 4.2 3.8 3.3 3.2 6.1 5.2 5.3
1990 2.2 17 3.0 4.3 3.9 3.3 3.3 6.1 5.2 5.3
1991 2.3 18 3.0 4.1 3.9 3.3 3.3 6.2 5.3 5.3
1992 2.3 17 3.0 4.1 3.8 3.3 3.2 6.1 5.3 5.3
1993 2.2 17 3.0 4.3 3.9 3.3 3.3 6.0 5.3 5.2
1994 2.3 17 3.0 4.3 3.8 3.3 3.3 6.0 5.3 5.2
1995 2.3 17 3.0 4.3 3.9 3.2 3.3 5.9 5.2 5.1
1996 2.3 17 3.0 4.3 3.9 3.3 3.3 5.9 5.2 5.2
1997 2.3 17 3d 4.3 3.9 3.2 3.3 5.8 5.1 5.1
1998 2.3 17 3d 4.3 3.9 3.2 3.3 5.8 5.1 5.1
1999 2.3 17 3.0 4.2 3.9 3.2 3.3 5.7 5.0 5.0
2000 2.2 17 3d 4,1 3.9 3.1 3.3 5.7 5.0 4.9
2001 2.2 17 3.0 4.2 3.9 3.1 3.2 5.6 5.0 4.9
2002 2.2 17 3.0 4.3 3.9 3.1 3.3 5.6 5.0 4.9
2003 2.2 17 3.0 4.3 3.9 3.1 3.3 5.6 5.0 4.9
2004 2.2 17 3.0 4.3 3.9 3.1 3.3 5.6 5.0 4.9
2005 2.2 17 3.0 4.3 4.0 3.1 3.3 5.6 5.0 5.0
2006 2.2 17 3.0 4.4 3.9 3.1 3.3 5.6 5.0 5.0
2007 2.2 16 3.0 4.4 4.0 3.1 3.3 5.6 4.9 5.0
2008 2.2 17 3.1 4.4 4.0 3.1 3.3 5.5 5.0 5.0
2009 2.2 17 3.1 4.4 4.0 3.1 3.4 5.5 5.0 5.0
2010 2.2 17 3.1 4.4 4.0 3.2 3.4 5.6 5.1 5.1
2.1 17 2.7 3.8 3.5 3.0 2.9 5.9 4.9 4.7
Demo 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987
graphics
1968 3.7 3.5 4.36 5.2 8.9 8.8 6.1 5.3 5.5 5.2
1969 3.7 3.4 4.2 5.2 8.8 8.7 6.1 5.3 5.5 5.1
1970 3.7 3.4 4.3 5.1 8.8 8.7 6.0 5.3 5.5 5.1
1971 3.7 3.5 4.3 5.2 8.8 8.77 6.0 5.3 5.5 5.1
1972 3.7 3.4 4.2 5.1 8.8 8.7 6.0 5.2 5.4 5.1
1973 3.7 3.4 4.2 5.1 8.8 8.77 5.9 5.2 5.4 5.1
1974 3.7 3.4 4.2 5.1 8.8 8.8 5.9 5.2 5.4 5.0
1975 3.7 3.4 4.2 5.0 8.8 8.8 5.9 5.2 5.3 5.0
1976 3.7 3.4 4.2 5.0 8.7 8.8 5.9 5.2 5.3 5.0
1977 3.7 3.4 4.2 5.0 8.7 8.5 5.9 5.2 5.3 5.0
1978 3.7 3.4 4.25 5.0 8.7 8.5 5.9 5.2 5.36 5.0
1979 3.7 3.4 4.2 5.0 5.8 8.5 5.9 5.2 5.3 5.0
1980 3.7 3.5 4.3 5.1 5.8 8.8 5.9 5.22 5.3 5.1
1981 3.8 3.5 4.4 5.2 7.0 8.7 5.9 5.3 5.45 5.1
1982 3.8 3.6 4.4 5.2 7.1 8.8 6.0 5.3 5.4 5.2
1983 3.8 3.6 4.4 5.2 7.0 8.7 6.1 5.3 5.4 5.2
1984 3.9 3.6 4.4 5.3 7.1 8.8 6.1 5.4 5.5 5.2
1985 3.9 3.6 4.4 5.3 7.1 8.8 6.2 5.4 5.5 5.2
1986 4.0 3.6 4.5 5.3 7.2 8.9 6.2 5.5 5.5 5.3
1987 3.9 3.8 4.5 5.3 7.2 8.9 6.2 5.5 5.5 5.3.
1988 4.0 3.7 4.5 5.4 7.3 9.0 6.2 5.6 5.6 5.4
1989 4.0 3.7 4.5 5.4 7.3 8.9 6.2 5.5 5.6 5.4
1990 4.0 3.74 4.5 5.4 7.3 8.9 6.3 5.5 5.7 5.4
1991 4.0 3.7 4.5 5.4 7.4 9.0 6.2 5.6 5.6 5.5
1992 4.0 3.6 4.5 5.3 7.3 8.9 6.1 5.6 5.5 5.4
1993 3.9 3.6 4.4 5.2 7.2 8.8 6.1 5.5 5.6 5.4
1994 3.9 3.6 4.4 5.3 7.2 8.8 6.1 5.6 5.5 5.5
1995 3.9 3.6 4.4 5.2 7.2 8.8 6.1 5.5 5.5 5.4
1996 3.9 3.6 4.4 5.2 7.2 8.7 6.1 5.5 5.5 5.4
1997 3.9 3.6 4.4 5.2 7.2 8.7 6.0 5.5 5.4 5.4
1998 3.8 3.6 4.3 5.1 7.1 8.7 5.9 5.4 5.4 5.4
1999 3.8 3.5 4.2 5.0 7.0 8.8 5.9 5.4 5.4 5.3
2000 3.7 3.5 4.2 4.9 8.9 8.4 5.8 5.4 5.4 5.3
2001 3.7 3.5 4.2 4.9 8.8 8.4 5.8 5.3 5.3 5.3
2002 3.7 3.5 4.2 4.9 8.8 8.3 5.8 5.3 5.3 5.3
2003 3.8 3.5 4.1 4.9 8.8 8.3 5.8 5.4 5.4 5.3
2004 3.8 3.5 4.1 4.9 8.8 8.3 5.9 5.3 5.3 5.3
2005 3.8 3.5 4.1 4.9 8.9 8.4 5.9 5.4 5.4 5.3
2006 3.8 3.5 4.1 4.9 8.8 8.4 5.9 5.4 5.4 5.3
2007 39 3.5 4.1 4.8 8.8 8.3 5.9 5.4 5.4 5.3
2008 32 3.6 4.1 4.8 8.8 8.3 5.8 5.4 5.3 5.3
2009 33 3.6 4.1 4.8 8.8 8.3 5.9 5.4 5.4 53.
2010 39 3.6 4.1 4.8 8.8 8.3 5.9 5.4 5.4 5.3
3.7 3.4 4.3 5.2 7.1 8.7 6.1 5.4 5.5 5.3
Labor Outcomos
Demo 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996
graphics
1968 4.5 3.9 4.0 5.7 5.5 6.2 5.1 4.2 4.5
1969 4.4 3.9 4.0 5.6 5.5 6.2 5.1 4.2 4.4
1970 4.4 3.9 4.0 5.6 5.5 6.2 5.1 4.1 4.4
1971 4.4 3.9 4.0 5.7 5.5 6.2 5.1 4.2 4.4
1972 4.4 3.9 4.0 5.6 5.4 6.1 5.1 4.1 4.4
1973 4.4 3.9 4.0 5.6 5.4 6.1 5.0 4.1 4.4
1974 4.4 3.9 4.0 5.6 5.4 6.1 5.0 4.1 4.4
1975 4.3 3.9 3.9 5.6 5.4 6.1 5.0 4.1 4.4
1976 4.3 3.8 3.9 5.5 8.3 6.1 5.0 4.1 4.4
1977 4.3 3.8 3.9 5.5 8.3 6.0 5.0 4.1 4.3
1978 4.3 3.8 3.9 5.5 8.3 6.0 5.0 4.1 4.4
1979 4.3 3.9 3.9 5.6 8.3 6.1 5.0 4.1 4.4
1980 4.3 3.9 4.0 5.7 6.4 6.1 5.0 4.1 4.4
1981 4.4 4.3 4.1 5.7 6.4 5.2 5.1 4.2 4.5
1982 4.4 4.0 4.1 5.7 6.4 5.20 5.1 4.2 4.5
1983 4.4 4.0 4.1 5.8 6.4 5.2 5.1 4.2 4.5
1984 4.5 4.1 4.1 5.8 6.55 5.3 5.2 4.3 4.5
1985 4.5 4.1 4.1 5.8 6.5 5.3 5.2 4.3 4.6
1986 4.6 4.1 4.2 5.9 6.52 5.3 5.2 4.3 4.6
1987 4.6 4.1 4.2 5.9 6.6 5.4 5.3 4.3 4.6
1988 4.6 4.2 4.2 5.9 6.6 5.4 5.3 4.4 4.6
1989 4.6 4.2 4.2 5.9 6.6 5.4 5.3 4.4 4.7
1990 4.6 4.2 4.2 6.0 6.7 5.5 5.3 4.4 4.7
1991 4.7 4.3 4.3 5.9 6.7 5.5 5.4 4.5 4.7
1992 4.7 4.2 4.3 5.9 6.6 5.5 5.3 4.4 4.7
1993 4.6 4.2 4.2 5.9 6.8 6.5 5.3 4.4 46
1994 4.6 4.2 4.2 5.9 6.5 6.5 5.4 4.4 47
1995 4.6 4.2 4.2 5.9 6.6 6.5 5.3 4.4 4.6
1996 4.6 4.2 4.2 5.9 6.6 6.5 5.3 4.5 4.7
1997 4.6 4.2 42 5.8 6.6 6.5 5.3 4.4 4.4
1998 4.6 4.1 4.2 5.8 6.8 6.5 5.3 4.4 4.6
1999 4.6 4.1 4.1 5.8 6.5 6.5 5.3 4.4 4.6
2000 4.5 4.1 4.1 5.7 6.4 6.4 5.2 4.4 4.5
2001 4.5 4.0 4.1 5.7 6.4 6.4 5.2 4.3 4.5
2002 4.55 4.0 4.0 5.7 6.4 6.3 5.2 4.4 4.5
2003 4.5 4.0 4.1 5.7 6.4 6.3 5.2 4.4 4.5
2004 4.5 4.0 4.1 5.7 6.4 6.3 5.25 4.4 4.5
2005 4.5 4.1 4.1 5.7 6.5 6.4 5.2 4.4 4.5
2006 4.6 4.1 4.1 5.7 6.5 6.4 5.2 4.4 4.6
2007 4.6 4.1 4.0 5.7 6.5 6.4 5.2 4.4 4.6
2008 4.5 4.1 4.0 5.7 6.5 6.3 5.2 44 4.5
2009 4.6 4.0 4.1 5.7 6.5 6.4 5.2 4.4 4.6
2010 4.6 4.0 4.1 5.7 6.5 6.4 5.2 4.4 4.5
Actual
4.6 4.2 4.2 6.0 6.7 6.5 5.4 4.4 4.6
Demo 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
graphics
1968 3.8 3.5 3.0 2.8 3.3 4.8 4.7 4.3 3.9 3.3
1969 3.8 3.5 3.0 2.8 3.3 4.8 4.7 4.3 3.9 3.3
1970 3.8 3.5 3.0 2.7 3.3 4.8 4.7 4.3 3.9 3.3
1971 3.8 3.5 3.0 2.7 3.3 4.8 4.7 4.3 3.9 3.3
1972 3.8 3.5 3.0 2.7 3.3 4.8 4.7 4.3 3.9 3.3
1973 3.8 3.5 3.0 2.7 3.2 4.8 4.5 4.2 3.9 3.3
1974 3.8 3.5 3.0 2.7 3.3 4.8 4.6 4.3 3.9 3.23
1975 3.8 3.4 2.9 2.7 3.2 4.7 4.6 4.2 3.9 3.3
1976 3.8 3.4 2.9 2.7 3.2 4.7 4.6 4.3 3.8 3.3
1977 3.8 3.4 2.9 2.7 3.2 4.7 4.6 4.3 3.8 3.3
1978 3.8 3.4 2.9 2.8 3.2 4.7 4.6 4.3 3.8 3.3
1979 3.8 3.4 2.9 2.8 3.2 4.7 4.7 4.3 3.8 3.3
1980 3.8 3.4 2.9 2.8 3.3 4.7 4.7 4.4 3.9 3.3
1981 3.9 3.5 3.0 2.9 3.3 4.7 4.8 4.4 4.0 3.3
1982 3.9 3.5 3.0 2.9 3.3 4.8 4.8 4.5 4.0 3.4
1983 3.9 3.5 3.0 2.9 3.3 4.9 4.8 4.5 4.0 3.4
1984 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.9 3.3 4.9 4.8 4.5 4.0 3.4
1985 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.9 3.4 4.9 4.8 46 4.0 3.5
1986 4.1 3.6 3.1 3.0 3.4 4.9 4.8 4.6 4.1 3.5
1987 4,1 3.6 3.1 3.0 3.4 5.0 4.9 4.6 4.1 3.5
1988 4.1 3.6 3.1 3.0 3.4 5.0 4.9 4.7 4.1 3.5
1989 4.1 3.7 3.1 3.0 3.4 5.0 4.9 4.7 4.12 3.5
1990 4.2 3.7 3.1 3.0 3.4 5.0 4.9 4.7 4.1 3.5
1991 4.2 3.7 32 3.1 3.5 4.9 4.9 4.8 4.1 3.7
1992 4.2 3.7 3.1 3.0 3.4 4.9 5.0 4.8 4.1 3.7
1993 4.1 3.6 3,1 3.0 3.4 4.9 5.0 4.8 4.1 3.7
1994 4.2 3.7 32 3.0 3.4 4.9 5.1 4.8 4.1 3.7
1995 4.1 3.7 3.1 3.0 3.4 4.9 5.1 4.8 4.1 3.7
1996 4.1 3.7 3.1 3.0 3.4 4.9 5.1 4.8 4.1 3.7
1997 4.1 3.6 3.1 3.0 3.4 4.8 5.1 4.8 4.1 3.7
1998 4.1 3.6 3.1 3.0 3.4 4.8 5.1 4.7 4.1 3.7
1999 4.1 3.6 3.1 3.0 3.4 4.8 5.0 4.7 4.1 3.7
2000 4.0 3.5 3.1 2.9 3.3 4.8 5.0 4.7 4.0 3.5
2001 4.0 3.5 3.1 2.9 3.3 4.8 5.0 45 4.0 3.6
2002 4.0 3.5 3.1 2.9 3.3 4.8 5.0 4.7 4.0 3.7
2003 4.0 3.5 3.1 2.9 3.3 4.7 Sd 4.7 4.0 3.7
2004 4.0 3.6 3.1 3.0 3.3 4.8 5.0 4.6 4.0 3.7
2005 4.1 3.6 3.1 3.0 3.3 4.8 5.0 4.7 4.0 3.7
2006 4.1 3.6 3.1 3.0 3.4 4.8 5.0 4.7 4.0 3.7
2007 4.0 3.6 3.1 3.0 3.4 4.7 5.0 4.7 4.0 3.7
2008 4.0 3.6 3.1 3.0 3.3 4.7 5.0 4.7 4.0 3.7
2009 4.0 3.6 3.1 3.0 3.4 4.7 5.0 4.7 4.0 3.7
2010 4.0 3.6 3.1 3.0 3.4 4.8 5.0 4.7 4.1 3.7
4.1 3.6 3.1 2.9 3.3 4.8 5.0 4.7 4.0 3.7
Demo 2007 2008 2009 2010
graphics
1968 3.5 4.3 8.2 9.1
1969 3.5 4.3 8.2 9.0
1970 3.5 4.3 8.1 9.0
1971 3.5 4.3 8.1 9.0
1972 3.5 4.2 8.1 9.0
1973 3.5 4.2 8.1 8.9
1974 3.5 4.2 8.1 8.9
1975 3.5 4.2 8.1 8.8
1976 3.5 4.1 8.0 8.8
1977 3.5 4.1 8.0 8.7
1978 3.5 4.1 8.0 8.7
1979 3.5 4.1 8.0 8.7
1980 3.5 4.2 8.0 8.8
1981 3.6 4.3 8.2 8.9
1982 3.6 4.3 8.2 8.9
1983 3.6 4.2 8.1 9.0
1984 3.6 4.3 8.2 9.0
1985 3.6 4.3 8.2 9.1
1986 3.7 4.4 8.3 9.1
1987 3.7 4.4 8.3 9.1
1988 3.7 4.4 8.4 9.1
1989 3.7 4.4 8.4 9.2
1990 3.7 4.4 8.4 9.3
1991 3.9 4.5 8.5 9.2
1992 3.8 4.4 8.4 9.1
1993 3.7 4.3 8.3 9.2
1994 3.7 4.4 8.3 9.1
1995 3.7 4.3 8.3 9.1
1996 3.7 4.3 8.3 9.1
1997 37 4.3 8.2 9.0
1998 3.7 4.3 8.1 8.9
1999 3.7 4.2 8.1 8.9
2000 3.7 4.2 8.1 8.9
2001 3.6 4.2 8.1 8.9
2002 37 4.2 8.12 8.9
2003 3.7 4.2 8.1 8.9
2004 3.7 4.2 8.1 8.9
2005 3.7 4.2 8.1 8.9
2006 3.7 4.2 8.1 8.9
2007 3.7 4.2 8.1 8.9
2008 3.7 4.2 8.1 8.9
2009 3.7 4.2 8.1 8.9
2010 3.8 4.2 8.1 8.9
3.7 4.2 8.1 8.9
Notes: Authors' own calculations froms the IPUMS-CPS data. The
columns correspond to the year of the labor outcomes used. The
rows correspond to the tear of the sociodemographic composition
used. Lightly shaded columns correspond to the NBER-dated
contractions (from peak to trough). Darkly shaded elements
correspond to actual values for given year.
Table 4 Decomposition of the Change in theEmployment
-to-Population Ratio Between 2010 and Earlier
Years, 25-64-Year-Old Males
Total Change Because of Change Because of
Year Change Labor Outcones Socidemographics
Percentage % of Percentage % of
Points Total Points Total
Change Change
1968 -15.52 -14.96 96.39 -0.56 3.61
1969 -15.52 -14.87 95.81 -0.65 4.19
1970 -14.45 -13.70 94.78 -0.76 5.22
1971 -12.75 -12.03 93.32 -0.72 5.68
1972 -12.46 -11.61 93.18 -0.85 6.82
1973 -12.40 -11.40 91.92 -1.00 8.08
1974 -12.22 -11.26 92.11 -0.96 7.89
1975 -8.26 -7.23 87.47 -1.04 12.53
1976 -8.16 -7.33 85.20 -1.27 14.80
1977 -9.08 -7.75 85.36 -1.33 14.64
1978 9.79 -8.54 87.21 -1.25 12.79
1979 -10.03 -8.90 86.41 -1.40 13.59
1980 -9.19 -7.77 84.59 -1.42 15.41
1981 -7.91 -6.57 83.10 -1.34 16.90
1982 -5.83 -4.37 74.85 -1.47 25.15
1983 -3.86 -2.25 58.29 -1.61 41.71
1984 -6.25 -4.65 74.44 -1.60 25.56
1985 -6.81 -5.25 77.03 -1.56 22.97
1986 -6.56 -5.03 76.73 -1.53 12.27
1987 -7.17 -5.50 16.59 -1.67 12.31
1988 -7.66 -6.07 70.23 -1.59 20.77
1989 -8.26 -6.59 79.68 -1.68 20.32
1990 -8.20 -6.49 79.15 -1.71 20.85
1991 -6.28 -4.80 76.45 -1.48 23.55
1992 -5.61 -4.01 71.44 -1.60 28.56
1993 -5.32 -3.61 67.81 -1.71 32.19
1994 -5.28 -3.53 66.78 -1.76 33.22
1995 -6.62 -4.61 69.59 -2.01 30.41
1996 -6.48 -4.69 72.39 -1.79 27.61
1997 -7.25 -5.56 76.65 -1.69 23.35
1998 -7.82 -6.17 78.87 -1.65 21.13
1999 -8.04 -6.29 78.27 -1.75 21.73
2000 -8.22 -6.38 77.57 -1.84 22.43
2001 -7.62 -5.90 77.39 -1.72 22.61
2002 -5.89 -4.33 73.61 -1.55 26.39
2003 -5.07 -3.66 72.14 -1.41 27.86
2004 -4.92 -3.69 75.03 -1.23 24.97
2005 -5.59 -4.62 82.75 -0.96 17.25
2006 -6.00 -5.24 87.39 -0.76 12.61
2007 -6.20 -5.46 88.10 -0.74 11.90
2008 -5.28 -4.80 91.00 -0.47 9.00
2009 -0.68 -0.39 56.79 -0.29 43.21
2010 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Notes: Authors' own calculations from the IPUMS-CPS data.
Bold rows correspond to the NBER-dated contractions (from
peak to trough). Columns 3-6 correspond to the decomposition
as described in (2).
Table 5 Decomposition of the Change in the Unemployment
-to-Population Ratio Between 2010 and Earlier Years
Total Change Because of Change Because of
Year Change Labor Outcomes Socidemographics
Percentage % of Percentage % of
Points Total Points Total
Change Change
1968 6.87 7.04 102.42 -0.17 -2.42
1969 7.20 7.31 101.46 -0.10 -1.46
1970 6.25 6.28 100.57 -0.04 -0.57
1971 5.10 5.18 101.62 -0.08 -1.62
1972 5.41 5.44 100.53 -0.03 -0.53
1973 5.90 5.88 99.61 0.02 0.39
1974 6.02 5.97 99.14 0.05 0.86
1975 3.00 2.89 96.20 0.11 3.80
1976 3.99 3.83 95.98 0.16 4.02
1977 4.22 4.05 95.79 0.18 4.21
1978 5.24 5.07 96.64 0.18 3.36
1979 5.48 5.28 96.33 0.20 3.67
1980 4.66 4.49 96.41 0.17 3.59
1981 3.73 3.72 99.76 0.01 0.24
1982 1.86 1.86 99.75 0.00 0.25
1983 0.18 0.18 101.02 0.00 -1.02
1984 2.82 2.86 101.41 -0.04 -1.41
1985 3.50 3.56 101.66 -0.06 -1.66
1986 3.40 3.55 104.50 -0.15 -4.50
1987 3.62 3.78 104.28 -0.15 -4.28
1988 4.32 4.53 105.07 -0.22 -5.07
1989 4.72 4.95 104.72 -0.22 -4.72
1990 4.69 4.96 105.69 -0.27 -5.69
1991 2.90 3.25 112.03 -0.35 -12.03
1992 2.26 2.58 114.43 -0.33 -14.43
1993 2.45 2.67 108.79 -0.22 -8.79
1994 3.55 3.79 106.79 -0.24 -6.79
1995 4.47 4.63 103.61 -0.16 -3.61
1996 4.28 4.49 105.03 -0.21 -5.03
1997 4.78 5.00 104.59 -0.22 -4.59
1998 5.32 5.49 103.31 -0.18 -3.31
1999 5.83 5.90 101.11 -0.06 -1.11
2000 5.99 6.00 100.09 -0.01 -0.09
2001 5.57 5.53 99.21 0.04 0.79
2002 4.16 4.12 98.96 0.04 1.04
2003 3.93 3.87 98.53 0.06 1.47
2004 4.24 4.20 98.87 0.05 1.13
2005 4.89 4.87 99.63 0.02 0.37
2006 5.24 5.23 99.98 0.00 0.02
2007 5.25 5.19 98.87 0.06 1.13
2008 4.76 4.71 99.04 0.05 0.96
2009 0.83 0.80 96.35 0.03 3.65
2010 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Notes: Authors' own calculations from the TPUMS-CPS data.
Bold rows correspond to the NBER-datcd contractions (from
peak to trough). Columns 3-6 correspond to the decomposition
as described in (2).
Table 6 Decomposition of the Change in the OLF-to-Population
Ratio Between 2010 and Earlier Years
Change Because of Change Because of
Labor Outcomes Socidemographics
Total Percentage % of Percentage % of
Year Change Points Total Points Total
Change Change
1968 8.65 7.92 91.51 0.73 8.49
1969 8.32 7.55 90.73 0.77 9.27
1970 8.21 7.41 90.25 0.80 9.75
1971 7.65 6.84 89.40 0.81 10.60
1972 7.05 6.15 87.27 0.90 12.73
1973 6.50 5.51 84.88 0.98 15.12
1974 6.20 5.28 85.16 0.92 14.84
1975 5.26 4.31 81.82 0.96 18.18
1976 4.61 3.50 75.80 1.12 24.20
1977 4.85 3.70 76.15 1.16 23.85
1978 4.55 3.46 76.03 1.09 23.97
1979 4.83 3.60 74.62 1.22 25.38
1980 4.53 3.27 72.15 1.26 27.85
1981 4.18 2.85 68.10 1.33 31.90
1982 3.97 2.50 62.90 1.47 37.10
1983 3.68 2.06 55.89 1.62 44.11
1984 3.43 1.77 51.70 1.66 48.30
1985 3.31 1.68 50.69 1.63 49.31
1986 3.16 1.46 46.24 1.70 53.76
1987 3.55 1.72 48.30 1.84 51.70
1988 3.35 1.53 45.69 1.82 54.31
1989 3.54 1.63 46.01 1.91 53.99
1990 3.51 1.51 43.12 2.00 56.88
1991 3.38 1.54 45.67 1.84 54.33
1992 3.36 1.42 42.26 1.94 57.74
1993 2.87 0.93 32.32 1.94 67.68
1994 1.73 -0.28 -16.19 2.02 116.19
1995 2.15 -0.03 -1.41 2.18 101.41
1996 2.21 0.18 7.96 2.03 92.04
1997 2.47 0.54 21.98 1.93 78.02
1998 2.51 0.63 25.06 1.88 74.94
1999 2.21 0.37 16.76 1.84 83.24
2000 2.23 0.36 15.93 1.88 84.07
2001 2.05 0.35 16.92 1.70 83.08
2002 1.72 0.19 10.93 1.53 89.07
2003 1.14 -0.24 -20.80 1.38 120.80
2004 0.67 -0.53 -78.90 1.20 178.90
2005 0.70 -0.27 -38.66 0.97 138.66
2006 0.76 0.00 -0.16 0.76 100.16
2007 0.95 0.27 28.02 0.69 71.98
2008 0.52 0.08 14.69 0.44 85.31
2009 -0.15 -0.43 284.63 0.28 -184.63
2010 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Notes: Authors' own calculations from the IPUMS-CPS data.
Bold rows correspond to the NBER-dated contractions (from
peak to trough). Columns 3-6 correspond to the decomposition
as described in (2)
Table 7 Predicted Aggregate OLF-to-Population
Ratio Among 25-64-Year-Old Men, 2015
Panel A: Based on 2010 Labor Outcomes
Actual Predicted
2010 2015
Employment-to-Population 76.33 X
Unemployment-to-Population 8.92 X
OLF-to-Population 14.75 16.27
Panel B: Based on 2007 Labor Outcomes
Actual Predicted
2007 2015
Employment-to-Population 82.53 X
Uncmployment-to-Population 3.67 X
OLF-to-Population 13.79 16.04
Panel C: Age Composition (Percent)
Age Actual Simulated Census
2010 2015 2015
25-34 25.80 26.36 26.74
35-44 25.20 23.93 24.63
45-54 27.50 25.87 25.43
55-64 21.50 23.85 23.20
Employment
The actual 2010 value of the employment-to-population ratio for
25-64-year-old men and the two series of counterfactual predictions for
2010 are shown in Figure 6, Panel A. The dashed line shows the predicted
employment-to-population ratio from holding the demographic composition
of the population constant at its 2010 level but varying the labor
outcomes of different groups. The dotted line shows the predicted
employment-to-population ratio from holding the labor outcomes of
different groups at their 2010 level but varying the sociodemographic
composition of the population. The actual employment-to-population ratio
in 2010 is lower than any point of the predicted counterfactual series.
This implies that changes in both the sociodemographic composition and
labor outcomes of different groups in 2010 contribute to the
historically low employment-to-population ratio among men.
To examine the contribution of the change in the labor outcomes of
different groups and the sociodemographic composition to changes in the
employment-to-population ratio, we construct each term of equation (2)
for [t.sub.1] [member of] [1968,2010] and [t.sub.2] = 2010. Table 4
reports the change in the employment-to-population ratio, the total
change as a result of change in each of the two terms, and the
percentage of the total change that is accounted for by changes in each
of the two terms. Figure 7, Panel A plots the change in the
employment-to-population ratio and the total change as a result of each
of the two terms. We find that the change in the labor outcomes of
different groups accounts for the majority of the change in the
employment-to-population ratio. Comparing the aftermath of the 2007-2009
and 1980-1982 recessions, we see that between 1983-2010 the
employment-to-population ratio fell by 3.86 percentage points, of which
41.7 percent is a result of the change in the demographic composition.
[FIGURE 6 OMITTED]
We conclude that the decline in the employment-to-population ratio
is a result of both changes in the sociodemographic composition and
changes in the labor outcomes of different groups.
Unemployment
Panel B of Figure 6 plots the two counterfactual series of the 2010
unemployment-to-population ratio against its actual 2010 value. We draw
two key observations from the figure: (1) the actual 2010
unemployment-to-population ratio is higher than any point of the
predicted counterfactual series that holds the sociodemographic
composition constant at its 2010 level; and (2) the actual 2010
unemployment-to-population ratio is lower than the predicted
counterfactual for some periods when we hold the labor outcomes of
different groups constant at their 2010 level.
These observations suggest that (1) the labor outcomes of different
sociodemographic groups in 2010 contribute to a higher
unemployment-to-population ratio than the labor outcomes of different
groups in all previous years; and (2) the sociodemographic composition
of the population in 2010 actually contributes to a lower
unemployment-to-population ratio as compared to the sociodemographic
composition in some earlier years.
Table 5 breaks down the total change in the
unemployment-to-population ratio between a given year and 2010 into
change caused by developments in the demographic composition of the
population and change caused by developments in the labor outcomes of
different groups. Figure 7, Panel B plots the total change in the
unemployment-to-population ratio and the change as a result of each of
the two terms. The results of this table and graph corroborate our above
claims. Changes in the demographic composition of the population have
contributed a small, and often negative, amount of the increase in the
unemployment-to-population ratio, whereas changes in the labor outcomes
of different groups have been responsible for approximately 100 percent
of the increase. We observe that, relative to 1983, the 2010
unemployment-to-population ratio is 0.18 percentage points higher, of
which 101.0 percent of the change is a result of a change in the labor
outcomes of different groups. Thus, the rise in the 2010
unemployment-to-population ratio relative to its 1983 level is driven
entirely by changes in the labor outcomes of different groups.
Out of Labor Force
Panel C of Figure 6 plots the two counterfactual series of the 2010
OLF-to-population ratio against its actual 2010 value. We highlight two
features of the figure: (1) The actual 2010 OLF-to-population ratio is
always higher than the counterfactual series calculated by holding the
labor outcomes of different groups at their 2010 level; and (2) prior to
1994, the actual 2010 OLF-to-population ratio is always higher than the
counterfactual series that is calculated by holding the sociodemographic
composition constant at its 2010 level, although after 1994 the
counterfactual is sometimes higher. Thus, we infer that the demographic
composition contributes substantially to the high OLF-to-population
ratio in 2010.
Table 6 and Figure 7, Panel C formalize this result, showing that
the total change in the incidence of the OLF-to-population ratio between
any year prior to 2009 and 2010 is positive. It also shows that the
change in the sociodemographic composition contributes to a higher
OLF-to-population ratio. The contribution from the change in the
sociodemographic composition has been increasing since 1968. The
contribution from the change in the labor outcomes of different groups
has been significantly smaller, and has even lowered the
OLF-to-population ratio in more recent years. Turning our attention once
again to the 1983 and 2010 comparison, we see that the OLF-to-population
ratio increased 3.68 percentage points from 1983-2010, of which 1.66
percentage points can be attributed to the change in the demographic
composition. Thus, changes to the demographic composition of the
population have played a large role in increasing the 2010
OLF-to-population ratio relative to its 1983 level.
4. FORECAST OF THE OLF-TO-POPULATION RATIO
Our findings show that changes in the employment-and
OLF-to-population ratios of 25-64-year-old men during the last four
decades are, to a large degree, associated with changes in the
sociodemographic composition of the population. Using the labor outcomes
of different sociodemographic groups from 2010 and a projected
sociodemographic composition of the population in 2015, we are able to
create projections of the aggregate labor outcomes in 2015 using
equation (1).
As Figure 1 shows, there is a large cyclical component in the
employment and unemployment-to-population ratios. Consequently, the
forecasts of these ratios depend heavily on the business cycle phase of
the year of our decomposition. In addition, the changes in unemployment
(and employment to a lesser extent) are mostly dominated by changes in
the labor outcomes of different sociodemographic groups rather than
changes in the sociodernographic composition. In contrast, the
OLF-to-population ratio has a much smaller cyclical component.
Consequently, we focus on forecasting the OLF-to-population ratio.
[FIGURE 7 OMITTED]
To perform this forecasting exercise, we project the
sociodemographic composition of the population of 25-64-year-old men in
2015. In projecting this composition, we focus on the changes in age of
the individuals in the 2010 sample while holding education, race, and
marital characteristics constant at their 2010 levels.
To simulate a sample of 25-64-year-old male workers in 2015, we use
the 2010 sample of 20-59-year-old male workers and construct the age
variable for 2015. We use the agespecific annual male mortality rates
from the Social Security Administration (4) and accordingly choose which
workers of a particular age survive from 2010-2015. (5) Each worker in
the simulated sample is aged five years, but has the same education,
race, and marital status as in the 2010 sample. We use the projected
2015 population and the CPS sampling weights to construct the
sociodemographic composition terms in equation (1). Then we use these
forecasted demographic composition terms and the labor outcomes of the
corresponding sociodemographic groups from 2010 to construct the
predicted aggregate 2015 OLF-to-population ratio using equation (1).
Note that this exercise assumes that the mortality rates for each
age remain unchanged from 2007-2015. Also, we use the sampling weights
from 2010, which may not deliver a representative population for our
simulated 2015 sample (for example, because we do not adjust the weights
to reflect the demographic composition of the surviving individuals).
However, given the relatively short forecast horizon, these weights
provide a good approximation for aggregation. Finally, when aging the
2010 population, we do not accordingly adjust demographic factors other
than age. For example, aging a male from 20 to 25 might alter both his
educational attainment and marital status. Our forecasting exercise does
not take these effects into account.
The results of our forecast are displayed in Table 7. Panel C of
Table 7 contains our forecast and the U.S. Census forecast for the age
distribution of 25-64-year-old men in 2015. As the forecast shows, the
shares of 55-64 and 25-34-year-old males are projected to increase,
while the share of 35-54-year-old males is projected to decrease.
Panel A of Table 7 displays the results of the forecast of the
OLF-to-population ratio based on the labor status outcomes of different
groups in 2010. For comparison, Panel B contains the results based on
the labor status outcomes of different groups in 2007, i.e., the year of
a recent business cycle peak. The results show that under both sets of
labor status outcomes of different groups, the OLF-to-population ratio
is predicted to reach more than 16 percent in 2015 as compared to the
actual rate of 14.7 percent in 2010.
5. CONCLUSIONS
The OLF-to-population ratio among 25-64-year-old men has increased
from 6.5 percent in 1970 to 14.7 percent in 2010. In the aftermath of
the 1969-1970 recession, the employment-to-population ratio among this
group was 89.1 percent, while in the aftermath of the 2007-2009
recession, the ratio is nearly 13 percentage points lower. Throughout
this article we have examined the degree to which these changes can be
explained by changes in the composition of the population by age, race,
education, and marital status, and the degree to which they can be
attributed to changes in the labor market outcomes of different
sociodemographic groups.
We find that the rise in the OLF-to-population ratio since the
early 1980s is primarily a result of changes in the demographic
composition of the population. Changes in the demographic composition
account for about 25 percent of the increase in the
employment-to-population ratio during the same period, and changes in
the unemployment-to-population ratio are almost entirely driven by
changes in the employment status composition. Finally, simulating the
2010 sample five years forward and using labor outcomes of different
sociodemo-graphic groups from 2010, we project that the
OLF-to-population ratio among 25-64-year-old men will rise to 16 percent
in 2015.
REFERENCES
Autor, David H., and Mark G. Duggan. 2003. "The Rise in the
Disability Rolls and the Decline in Unemployment." The Quarterly
Journal of Economics 118 (February): 157-205.
Fallick, Bruce, and Jonathan Pingle. 2006. "A Cohort-Based
Model of Labor Force Participation." Federal Reserve Board of
Governors Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2007-2009.
Juhn, Chinhui, Kevin M. Murphy, and Robert H. Topel. 1991.
"Why Has the Natural Rate of Unemployment Increased Over
Time?" Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 22 (2): 75-142.
Juhn, Chinhui, Kevin M. Murphy, and Robert H. Topel. 2002.
"Current Unemployment, Historically Contemplated." Brookings
Papers on Economic Activity 33 (1): 79-136.
Little, Allan, and Steve Bradley. 2007. "The Determinants of
Changes in the Risk of Unemployment and Inactivity in Britain: A
Decomposition Analysis." Labour Economics Research Group Discussion
Paper No. 17.
Polivka, Anne E., and Stephen M. Miller. 1995. "The CPS After
the Redesign: Refocusing the Economic Lens." Manuscript, Bureau of
Labor Statistics.
Shimer, Robert. 1999. "Why is the U.S. Unemployment Rate so
Much Lower?" In NBER Macroeconomics Annual 1998, Volume 13, edited
by Ben S. Bernanke and Julio Rotemburg. Chicago, The University of
Chicago Press, 11-61.
U.S. Census Bureau. 2008. "2008 National Population
Projections." Washington, D.C.: U.S. Census Bureau.
www.census.gov/population/www/projections/2008projections.html.
(1.) The focus of this article is on the employment-,
unemployment-and OLF-to-population ratios. These are defined as the
proportion of individuals in the entire population with a given labor
status. They are thus distinct from rates (e.g., the unemployment rate),
which are defined as the proportion of the labor force (i.e., the sum of
unemployed and employed persons) with a given labor status outcome.
(2.) This article focuses on the male population. The
OLF-to-population ratio for women fell drastically from 1968 to the
mid-1990s as females entered employment, while that of males trended
upward. Since the mid-1990s, the OLF-to-population ratios for males and
females have experienced similar trends, though the OLF-to-population
ratio for females remains approximately 10 percentage points higher.
While studying aggregate employment outcomes for both genders would be
an interesting exercise, doing so is beyond the scope of this article.
(3.) Results of the alternative decomposition are available upon
request.
(4.) Data available at: www.ssa.gov/oact/STATS/table4c6.html#ss.
(5.) For example, the probability that a 20-year-old worker in 2010
survives to 2015 is (1 - [p.sup.m.sub.20]) (1 - [p.sup.m.sub.21])(1 -
[p.sup.m.sub.22](1 - [p.sup.m.sub.23])(1 - [p.sup.m.sub.24), where
[p.sup.m.sub.a] is the annual mortality rate of a worker at age a.
We would like to thank Huberto Ennis, Arantxa Jarque, Nadezhda
Malysheva, and Alexander Wolman for their invaluable comments. The views
expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of the Federal Reserve
Bank of Richmond or the Federal Reserve System. E-mail:
marianna.kudlyak@rich.frb.org; thomas.lubik@rich.frb.org;
jonathan.tompkins@rich.frb.org.