EMPLOYMENT DURING ADOLESCENCE IS ASSOCIATED WITH DEPRESSION, INFERIOR RELATIONSHIPS, LOWER GRADES, AND SMOKING.
Largie, Shay ; Field, Tiffany ; Hernandez-Reif, Maria 等
ABSTRACT
A self-report questionnaire was administered to high school seniors
to collect data on the psychological, behavioral, and social aspects of
their lives. It was found that employment was associated with (1)
greater depression; (2) inferior relationships with parents and best
friend, including less time and physical contact with parents; (3) lower
grade point average; and (4) smoking.
Adolescents are often employed part-time during the school year
(Bachman & Schulenberg, 1993; Mortimer, Finch, Ryu, & Shanahan,
1996), and frequently by their senior year, they are working more than
20 hours a week (Steinberg & Dornbusch, 1991). A review of the
literature reveals that adolescent employment has both positive and
negative effects (Mael, Morath, & McLeelan, 1997; Mihalic &
Elliot, 1997). Positive effects of adolescent employment include a
stronger sense of personal efficacy and orientation to occupational
achievement (Mael et al., 1997; Mihalic & Elliot, 1997). However,
working has also been associated with negative aspects of adolescents
psychological, behavioral, and social well-being. For example, working
adolescents, especially girls, have been found to be notably more
depressed (Shanahan, Finch, Mortimer, & Ryu, 1991; Steinberg &
Dornbusch, 1991). Working adolescents have also been noted to experience
inferior relationships with their parents, which may be related to
spending less time with their families (Sayfer, Hawkins-Leahy, &
Colan, 1995; Steinberg & Dornbusch, 1991). In addition to less
family time, they have less time to spend on homework, which may result
in a lower grade point average (Mihalic & Elliot, 1997). Further, it
has been reported that working adolescents engage in substance abuse
more frequently than adolescents who do not work during high school
(Mihalic & Elliot, 1997; Steinberg & Dornbusch, 1991).
In the present study, all of these effects were explored in the
same sample. Nonworking adolescents were compared with adolescents who
worked at least two hours per week. Working was expected to affect mood,
parent and peer relationships, and academic achievement.
METHOD
Participants
Eighty-nine high school seniors (52 females, 37 males; mean age =
17.2 years) were recruited from a suburban South Florida high school.
Eighty questionnaires were subsequently completed. Participants'
ethnic distribution was 75% Caucasian, 11% Hispanic, 5% Asian, and 4%
African-American, with the remaining 5% classifying themselves as other.
Their socioeconomic status was middle to upper middle class. Fifty-two
percent reported that they did not work, 20% worked 2--6 hours per week,
and 28% worked more than 7 hours per week. Chi-square analyses revealed
that the nonworking and working (2 hours or more per week) groups were
not differentially distributed by gender or ethnicity (see Table 1).
Procedure
Participants were administered a Likert-type questionnaire that
gathered information on psychological, behavioral, and social aspects of
adolescent life (Field & Yando, 1991). The questionnaire was
completed anonymously.
Depression. The Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale
(CES-D; Radloff, 1977) contains twenty depressive symptoms experienced
over the past week (e.g., "I felt lonely"), which are rated on
a four-point Likert scale (0 = rarely or none of the time, 1 = some or a
little of the time, 2 = a lot of the time, and 3 = most of the time).
This scale has been standardized for high school populations, with a
score of 19 or higher indicating depressed mood (Radloff, 1991).
Acceptable test-retest reliability (.80--.90) and concurrent validity have been reported across a variety of demographic characteristics,
including age, education, and ethnic groups (Wells, Klerman, &
Deykin, 1987).
Relationships. The 24-item Intimacy Scale (Blyth &
Foster-Clark, 1987) assesses mother, father, and best friend
relationships. Respondents rate their relationships on a scale from 1 =
not at all to 5 = very much. Questions include the following: "How
much does your mother understand what you are really like?"
"How much do you g o to your father for advice/support?"
"How much do you share your inner feelings or secrets with your
best friend?" Higher scores indicate more optimal relationships.
This scale has been reported to have good internal consistency and
test-retest reliability (Blyth & Foster-Clark, 1987).
Additional relationship items included (a) conversations with each
parent: "How often do you have conversations with your mother (or
father)?" (1 = never to 5 = daily) and "How good do you think
your conversations are with your mother (or father)?" (1 =
nonexistent to 5 = very good); (b) touch with each parent: "How
often does your mother (or father) hug or show you physical
affection?" and "How often do you hug or show physical
affection toward your mother (or father)?" (1 never to 5 = daily);
and (c) time spent with family or friends (1 = one hour or less, 2 two
to six hours, and 8 = seven or more hours per week).
Free-time activities. These questions included (a) time doing
chores (1 = one hour or less, 2 = two to six hours, and 3 = seven or
more hours per week); and (b) time on the Internet (1 less than one
hour, 2 = one to two hours, and 3 = more than two hours per day).
Academic achievement. Adolescents reported their grade point
average (GPA), which was coded as 4 = A, 3 = B, 2 = C and 1 = D, and
whether they attended honors classes.
Cigarette use. Adolescents rated their use of cigarettes on a scale
from 1 never to 5 = regularly.
RESULTS
As shown in Table 2, correlation analyses (Spearman's rho)
revealed that working was related to the following: (1) higher
depression scores; (2) poorer relationships with parents (fewer
conversations and of poorer quality) and best friend; (3) less touch (or
physical affection) with parents; (4) less time spent with family (but
not friends); (5) more hours spent doing chores; (6) lower grade point
average; and (7) more frequent smoking. Adolescents who worked were also
significantly less likely (p [less than] .01) to be enrolled in honors
classes than were those who did not work (32% versus 68%, respectively).
DISCUSSION
These findings are similar to those previously reported for
adolescents who work in excess of 20 hours per week-greater depression,
inferior relationships, and lower grades (Sayfer, Leahy, & Colan,
1995; Shanahan, Mortimer, Finch, Ryu, & Shanahan, 1991). In
particular, results of the present study revealed that working more
hours was related to fewer conversations with parents, spending less
time with them, and showing and receiving less physical affection (e.g.,
hugs). Future studies might examine whether less touching during
adolescence is related to greater depression, and whether increasing
physical contact (such as through hugs and back rubs by friends and
family members) would decrease depression, as has been noted for massage
therapy (Field, Morrow, Valdeon, Larson, Kuhn, & Schanberg, 1992).
While working was also related to poorer relationships with best
friends, it was not associated with time spent with friends or on the
Internet. Surprisingly, work was related to spending more time doing
chores, although working and chores were also associated in another
study (Entwise, Alexander, Olson, & Ross, 1999). Perhaps working
leads to a greater sense of responsibility, or vice versa.
The relationship between working and poorer academic performance is
consistent with a study reporting lower grade point averages for
adolescents who work more than 20 hours per week (Mihalic & Elliot,
1997). In the present study, working even as few as 2 hours per week was
associated with lower GPA and not being enrolled in honors classes.
Moreover, adolescent smoking was also positively related to working.
In sum, working may be detrimental for adolescents in their senior
year of high school. Working was associated with depressed mood,
diminished intimacy with family and friends, lower GPA, and more
frequent cigarette use. Future studies should explore adolescents'
motives for working. As this was a homogeneously middle socioeconomic
sample, there was no apparent need to work for financial reasons.
Discouraging adolescents from working will require knowing their
motivations. Further, the direction of effects could not be determined
here. Adolescents who do less well academically, for example, may elect
to work for self-esteem reasons, rather than their employment
contributing to inferior academic performance. Additional research is
needed to help parents and adolescents make more informed choices.
The authors would like to thank the students who participated in
this study, as well as Christy Cullen, Angelica Escalona, and Michelle
Kaplan for their assistance with data collection. This research was
supported by an NIMH Research Scientist Award (MH00331) to Tiffany
Field, and funding from Johnson and Johnson to the Touch Research
Institutes.
Shay Largie, Tiffany Field, Maria Hernandez-Reif, Christopher E.
Sanders, and Miguel Diego, Touch Research Institutes.
Reprint requests to Tiffany Field, Touch Research Institutes,
University of Miami School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics
(D-820), P.O. Box 016820, Miami, Florida 33101. Electronic mail may be
sent to tfield@med.miami.edu.
REFERENCES
Bachman, J., & Schulenberg, J. (1993). How part-time work
intensity relates to drug use, problem behavior, time use and
satisfaction among high school seniors: Are these consequences or merely
correlates? Developmental Psychology, 29, 220-235.
Blyth, D., & Foster-Clark, F. (1987). Gender differences in
perceived intimacy with different members of adolescents' social
networks. Sex Roles, 17, 689-719.
Entwise, D., Alexander, K., Olson, L., & Ross, K. (1999). Paid
work in early adolescence: Developmental and ethnic patterns. Journal of
Early Adolescence, 19, 363-388.
Field, T., Morrow, C., Valdeon, C., Larson, S., Kuhn, C., &
Schanberg, S. (1992). Massage reduces anxiety in child and adolescent
psychiatric patients. Journal of the American Academy of Child and
Adeolescent Psychiatry, 31, 125-131.
Field, T., & Yando, R. (1991). Adolescents'
Self-Perceptions Scales. Unpublished scales.
Mael, F., Morath, R., & McLellan, J. (1997). Dimensions of
adolescent employment. Career Development Quarterly, 45, 351-368.
Mihalic, S., & Elliot, D. (1997). Short- and long-term
consequences of adolescent work. Youth and Society, 28, 464-498.
Mortimer, J., Finch, M., Ryu, S., & Shanahan, M. (1996). The
effects of work intensity on adolescent mental health, achievement, and
behavioral adjustment: New evidence from a prospective study. Child
Development, 67, 1243-1261.
Radloff, L. (1977). The Center for Epidemiological Studies
Depression (CESD) Scale: A self-report depression scale for research in
the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385-401.
Radloff, L. (1991). The use of the Center for Epidemiological
Studies Depression Scale in adolescents and young adults. Journal of
Youth and Adolescence, 20, 149-166.
Sayfer, A., Leahy, B., & Colan, N. (1995). The impact of work
on adolescent development. Journal of Contemporary Human Services, 1,
38-45.
Shanahan, M., Finch, M., Mortimer, J., & Ryu, S. (1991).
Adolescent work experience and depressive affect. Social Psychology
Quarterly, 54, 299-317.
Steinberg, L., & Dornbusch, S. (1991). Negative correlates of
part-time employment during adolescence: Replication and elaboration.
Developmental Psychology, 27, 304-313.
Wells, V., Klerman, G., & Deykin, E. (1987). The prevalence of
depressive symptoms in college students. Social Psychiatry, 22, 20-28.
Table 1.
Demographic Data
Groups
Nonworking Working [[chi].sup.2] p
Gender .17 .69
Male 55% 45%
Female 50% 50%
Ethnicity 5.74 .22
Caucasian 54% 46%
Hispanic 33% 67%
Asian 56% 44%
African-American 0% 100%
Other 75% 25%
Socioeconomic Status 8.54 .07
High 68% 32%
Upper Middle 50% 50%
Middle 36% 64%
Lower Middle 0% 100%
Low 33% 67%
Note. Working = 2 hours or more per week.
Table 2.
Correlations Between Working
and Other Variables
Work
Depression .23 [*]
Relationship with Parents and
Friends
Intimacy With Parents and -.42 [***]
Friends
Parent Conversation -.34 [*]
Parent Touch -.32 [**]
Time with Family -.26 [*]
Time with Friends -.20
Free-Time Activities
Time Doing Chores .40 [***]
Time on the Internet -.05
GPA -.20 [*]
Smoking .27 [**]
(*)p [less than] .05,
(**)p [less than] .01,
(***)p [less than] .001