Football, fast cars, and cheerleading: adolescent gender norms, 1978-1989.
Suitor, J. Jill ; Reavis, Rebel
During the past decade, there has been substantial interest in
examining and explaining changes in gender-role attitudes and behaviors
in the United States. This line of research has shown that gender-role
attitudes have become markedly less traditional over the past two
decades (cf. Mason & Lu, 1988; McBroom, 1987; Thornton, Alwin, &
Camburn, 1983). This work has also revealed a decrease in traditionalism
regarding the division of household labor across the 1970s and early
1980s (cf. Robinson, 1988; Shelton & Coverman, 1988), although the
changes on these behavioral dimensions of gender roles are far less
dramatic than are the changes in stated attitudes.
While this literature has shed a great deal of light on changes in
adults' gender-role attitudes and behaviors, much less attention
has been directed toward changes in gender roles among adolescents. This
segment of the population should be of particular interest to scholars
since adolescents are the harbingers of American gender roles in the
coming decades.
Data from several sources suggest that adolescents entered the 1980s
with surprisingly traditional gender-role attitudes. For example,
Thornton and her colleagues' 1980 findings (1983) revealed that
although adolescents held more liberal gender-role attitudes than did
their mothers, a substantial proportion maintained relatively
traditional attitudes. In fact, almost half of the adolescents agreed
with the statement that "It is much better for everyone if the man
earns the living and the woman takes care of the home and family."
Similarly, Corder and Stephan (1984) found that while 70% of the
school-age girls they surveyed in 1978 wanted to combine parenting,
marriage, and employment, only 40% of the boys wanted their future wives
to combine these roles. Consistent with this pattern, Hansen and Darling
(1985) found that the majority of the adolescents they studied in 1981
held relatively traditional attitudes toward the division of household
labor.
Studies of adolescents' views toward girls' participation
in sports in the late 1970s and early 1980s also demonstrated the
persistence of traditional gender-role attitudes, and the
characteristics of the people they would most like to date or be friends
with. Feltz (1978) reported that participation in sports accrued less
status for girls than did other behaviors or attributes, while Williams
and White (1983) found that the lowest ratings were assigned to girls
who participated in sports. Kane (1988), using data collected in 1982,
found that girls were least likely to choose athletics as the way they
would like to be remembered in high school. She also found that the
"gender-appropriateness" of the sport in which the girls
participated greatly affected both girls' and boys' choices of
friends and dating partners. Girls who were associated with sports that
were seen as gender-appropriate (e.g., tennis) were substantially more
likely to be viewed as desirable friends and partners than were girls
who were associated with less gender-appropriate sports (e.g.,
basketball).
Studies of other dimensions of adolescents' behaviors also
suggest the persistence of traditional gender roles a decade ago. For
example, Canaan's (1990) findings revealed that boys used different
mechanisms from girls to create and maintain their position in the
social hierarchy in their high schools in the late 1970s and early
1980s. While boys used joke-telling to demonstrate their masculinity by
defining their superiority to other males and females, girls used
note-passing to develop friendships and to subordinate other females.
Further, Eckert (1989) found that physical appearance and dress were of
greater importance to girls' than boys' social status among
adolescents in the early 1980s. Last, while cheerleading was an
important means by which girls could accrue prestige (Eckert, 1989;
Eicher, Baizerman, & Michelman, 1991; Foley, 1990), this activity
was never mentioned as an avenue by which boys could do so.
Taken together, these findings suggest that American adolescents
entered the 1980s with relatively traditional gender roles, as
exemplified by both their stated attitudes and differences in the ways
in which boys and girls accrued prestige. However, if changes in
adolescents' attitudes and behaviors paralleled those of adults
during the 1980s, we would expect to find substantially less gender-role
traditionalism among teenagers who were graduating from high school at
the end of the 1980s. On this basis, it was anticipated that there would
be fewer differences in the ways boys and girls acquired prestige in
high schools by the end of the decade.
The data used in the present paper were collected between 1978 and
1982, and between 1989 and 1990 from students enrolled in a large public
university in the northeastern United States. A total of 565 students
completed questionnaires; 69 students were omitted from the analysis
because their date of graduation from high school was either before
1978, or between 1983 and 1988. The final sample included 271 students
who graduated between 1978 and 1982, and 225 students who graduated
between 1988 and 1989. Fifty-nine per cent of the students were women;
41% were men.
All of the students were enrolled in introductory-level sociology
courses: 85% of the students were enrolled in Introduction to Sociology;
15% were enrolled in a lower division course in family sociology. There
were no statistically significant differences between the responses of
students enrolled in the two courses; therefore, the data were combined
for the analysis.
The data were collected during the first few weeks of the semester,
prior to any discussion of issues involving gender roles. Data were
collected from students enrolled in a total of nine classes taught by
four professors; the findings did not differ significantly by instructor
or class (within cohort).
Measurement
The students were asked to respond to the following requests: (1)
"List five ways in which males could gain prestige in the high
school you attended"; and (2) "List five ways in which females
could gain prestige in the high school you attended." The logic
behind this approach is that individuals generally acquire prestige by
adhering to group norms. Therefore, the means of acquiring prestige
should provide an indicator of the norms that exist in a particular
group.
The respondents mentioned a total of 61 ways in which students in
their high schools acquired prestige. Since several categories were
similar, they were combined for the analysis. For example, "being
friendly," "being outgoing," and "having a good
personality" were combined into the category labeled
"sociability"; "pretty," "handsome," and
"having a good body" were combined into the category labeled
"physical attractiveness." The 13 categories that were listed
most frequently are included individually in the analysis; the remainder
were combined in an "other" category which was taken into
consideration in the analysis, but is not shown in Table 1.
The students were also asked to specify their gender, the year in
which they graduated from high school, and the city/town in which they
attended high school.(1)
RESULTS
Table 1 shows the distribution of students' reports of ways in
which boys and girls acquired prestige in the high schools from which
they had recently graduated. For example, 33.6% of the students who
graduated between 1978 and 1982 reported that participation in sports
was one of the ways in which girls gained prestige, while 90% of the
students reported participation in sports as a way boys gained prestige.
The findings presented in the left-hand columns of Table I show
substantial differences in most of the avenues by which boys and girls
acquired prestige in high school in the early 1980s. Boys gained
prestige primarily through (1) sports, (2) grades and intelligence, (3)
access to cars, (4) sociability, (5) popularity with the opposite sex,
(6) physical appearance, and (7) participation in school activities
(e.g., school government, clubs). In contrast, girls gained prestige
primarily through (1) physical attractiveness, (2) sociability, (3)
grades and intelligence, (4) popularity with the opposite sex, (5)
clothes, (6) participation in school activities, and (7) cheerleading.
The reports of students who graduated in the late 1980s are shown in
the middle column of Table I. Boys in the late 1980s continued to
acquire prestige primarily through sports and grades and intelligence,
while girls continued to accrue prestige primarily through grades and
intelligence, and physical attractiveness. Thus, while grades and
intelligence [TABULAR DATA FOR TABLE I OMITTED] were important for both
boys and girls throughout the 1980s, sports continued to play a much
larger role in the prestige structure for boys than girls, while
physical attractiveness continued to play a much larger role for girls
than boys.
Some other behaviors and attributes by which students gained prestige
also remained highly segregated by gender throughout the 1980s. For
example, while a notable minority of students in both cohorts stated
that boys in their high school had gained prestige through
"toughness" or rowdiness, or by being a "class
clown," almost no students in either cohort reported that these
were avenues by which girls gained prestige. Conversely, although
cheerleading was mentioned with some frequency by members of both
cohorts as a way in which girls gained prestige, not one student in
either cohort mentioned cheer-leading as a way in which boys gained
prestige.
The most important change between the earlier and later cohorts was
in the area of prestige acquired through participation in sports -
particularly for girls; 34% of the students who graduated in 1978-82
mentioned sports participation as a way in which girls gained prestige,
compared to 44% of those who graduated in 1988-89. In contrast, sports
became a slightly less important avenue for boys; 90% of the 1978-82
graduates mentioned sports for boys, compared to 84% of the 1988-89
graduates. While these changes suggest a move toward parity in the role
of sports for boys' and girls' prestige, it is important to
recognize that among the 1988-89 graduates, sports participation is
still almost two times more likely to be named as a source of prestige
for boys than girls.
Another difference worth noting is the decrease in the role of
cheer-leading. While almost 33% of the students who graduated in 1978-82
reported that cheerleading was a means of gaining prestige for girls,
only 24% mentioned it in 1988-89. However, the fact that almost
one-quarter of the members of the later cohort listed cheerleading for
girls, while none listed it for boys, suggests that this activity
remains gender segregated, and continues to be an important means of
acquiring prestige for girls.
It is interesting to note that boys' acquisition of prestige
through access to cars declined substantially across the decade, going
from third to sixth place. The reasons for this remain unclear, and
cannot be accounted for by any of the variables included in the study.
For example, although a slightly larger proportion of students from the
1988-89 cohort attended high school in a city, this factor does not
account for the finding; the importance of access to cars declined to
the same degree among the subsample of students who attended high school
in the suburbs.
Separate analyses by gender of the respondent revealed that men and
women had generally similar perceptions of the ways in which boys and
girls had acquired prestige in high school (tables not shown). The few
differences of interest involved girls' participation in sports and
girls' sexual activity.
When the responses are divided by gender, it becomes clear that the
overall change in the prestige girls acquired through participation in
sports was due to changes in the boys' perceptions. Between 1978-82
and 1988-89, the percentage of women who mentioned sports as a way in
which girls gained prestige increased only slightly (from 39% to 44%);
however, the percentage of men who listed girls' sports as a means
of gaining prestige almost doubled (from 26% to 46%).
The other interesting difference between women's and men's
reports involved sexual activity as a means through which girls gained
prestige. As shown in Table 1, sexual activity for girls was mentioned
substantially more frequently among 1988-89 than among 1978-82
graduates. However, this change was due almost entirely to reports by
men. In the early 1980s, women and men were approximately equally likely
to report that girls gained prestige through being sexually active. In
contrast, among members of the later cohort, 16% of the men reported
that girls in their high school gained prestige through sexual activity,
compared to only 4% of the women.
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
The findings presented here suggest there was relatively little
change in gender norms among high school students between the early and
late 1980s. A comparison between the reports of students who graduated
in 1978-82 and those who graduated in 1988-89 shows that boys continued
to acquire prestige in high school primarily through sports, grades, and
intelligence, while girls continued to acquire prestige primarily
through a combination of physical appearance, sociability, grades, and
intelligence. The only noteworthy differences between the reports in the
early and late 1980s were an increase in girls' acquisition of
prestige through participation in sports and sexual activity, a decrease
in the role of cheerleading, and a reduction in the importance of car
ownership as a means by which boys accrued prestige.
The findings also indicated that most of the change that occurred in
the ways girls accrued prestige could be accounted for by changes in
boys', rather than girls' perceptions. Further, the particular
mechanisms that boys viewed as increasingly important were those that
have traditionally been avenues by which men, rather than women, have
gained prestige - participation in sports and engaging in sexual
activities. Thus, much of the change that occurred involved a greater
acceptance of girls in traditionally "male" activities rather
than the reverse, a pattern consistent with changes that have occurred
in the occupational structure across the same period (U.S. Bureau of the
Census, 1992).
One limitation of the present study is that the data were collected
from only one university. It is possible that this university differs
from many others in ways that could affect the findings. However, data
collected at another university, but not presented in the present paper,
suggest that the findings presented here may be replicated elsewhere.
Between 1985 and 1989 one of the authors collected data from students
enrolled in a medium-sized state university in New England. Analysis of
those data revealed the same pattern of findings presented here,
although the student bodies of the two universities differ substantially
on demographic dimensions that might have affected gender norms
(percentage of minorities; socioeconomic status; religion; percentage
who attended high school in urban areas). The similarity between the
reports of students in the two universities provides further support for
the contention that there has been relatively little change in high
school gender roles across the 1980s.
Thus, it appears that gender-role traditionalism continues to play an
important role in the prestige structure of American adolescents.
1 Students in the 1978-81 cohorts were not asked where they had
attended high school.
REFERENCES
Canaan, J. E. (1990). Passing notes and telling jokes: Gendered
strategies among American middle school teenagers. In F. Ginsburg, &
A. L. Tsing (Eds.), Uncertain terms: Negotiating in American culture.
Boston: Beacon Press.
Corder, J., & Stephan, C. W. (1984). Females' combination of
work and family roles: Adolescents' aspirations. Journal of
Marriage and the Family, 46, 391-402.
Eckert, P. (1989). Jocks and burnouts: Social categories and identity
in the high school. New York: Teachers College.
Eicher, J. B., Baizerman, S., & Michelman, J. (1991). Adolescent
dress, Part II: A qualitative study of suburban high school students.
Adolescence, 26, 679-686.
Feltz, D. (1978). Athletics in the social status system of female
adolescents. Review of Sport and Leisure, 3, 98-108.
Foley, D. E. (1990). The great American football ritual: Reproducing
race, class, and gender inequality. Sociology of Sport Journal, 7,
111-135.
Hansen, S. L., & Darling, C. A. (1985). Attitudes of adolescents
toward division of labor in the home. Adolescence, 20, 60-72.
Kane, M. J. (1988). The female athletic role as a status determinant within the social systems of high school adolescents. Adolescence, 23,
253-264.
Mason, K. O., & Lu, Y. H. (1988). Attitudes toward women's
familial roles: Changes in the United States, 1977-1985. Gender and
Society, 2, 39-57.
McBroom, W. H. (1987). Longitudinal change in sex-role orientations:
Differences between men and women. Sex Roles, 16, 439-452.
Robinson, J. P. (1988). Who's doing the housework? American
Demographics, 10, 24-29.
Shelton, B. A., & Coverman S. (1988). Are men's roles
converging with women's?: Estimating change in husbands'
domestic labor time, 1975-1981. Paper presented at the Annual Meetings
of the American Sociological Association, Atlanta, Georgia.
Thornton, A., Alwin, D. F., & Camburn, D. (1983). Causes and
consequences of sex-role attitudes and attitude change. American
Sociological Review, 48, 211-227.
Williams, J. M., & White, K. A. (1983). Adolescent status systems
for males and females at three age levels. Adolescence, 70, 381-389.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1992). Statistical Abstract of the United
States, 1992. Washington, DC.
This paper was presented at the August 1992 Meetings of the American
Sociological Association, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
The authors wish to thank Scott Feld, Karl Pillemer, and Patricia
Ulbrich for their comments on earlier drafts of this paper, and to
acknowledge Karl Pillemer, Sheryl Zebrowsky, and Bruce Hare for their
assistance in collecting the data.