Fishing for fish and for Jaminyjarti in Northern Aboriginal Australia.
Toussaint, Sandy
INTRODUCTION
Fishing activities, including how, where and when fish are caught,
cooked, shared and consumed are increasingly important topics in
discussions relating to Indigenous groups in the Kimberley and elsewhere
across Northern Australia. Jackson et al. (2012), for instance, in a
broad study focused on Australia's north, observe that fishing is a
significant activity that often consumes around 90% of Indigenous
people's time. In another article based on data collected
specifically from Fitzroy Valley locations, Jackson et al. (2011) draw
on a two-year study to show a high level of visiting frequency to
fishing sites by families from the Noonkanbah Community and from the
Fitzroy Crossing town-site, both of which are within walking distance of
a major river and fishing source. Morgan et al. (2004, 2011), writing
about the same region, outline the plethora of Indigenous people's
language names and locations for fish assemblages and local flora in the
Fitzroy River indicating not only people's knowledge but also their
familiarity with local environmental flows and interdependent fish and
plant species. (2) With similar reference to Fitzroy Valley communities,
Close et al. (2013) stress the priority that Indigenous people give to
fishing. They note that 'the importance and magnitude of
recreational as well as customary fishing is substantial' (p. 4).
Elsewhere, I have shown that Aboriginal people in the Fitzroy Valley
'value fishing and the catching, cooking and consumption of a range
of fish and other freshwater species ... as an immeasurable constancy in
their lives' (Toussaint 2010:10).
Matters such as these--fishing and fish sharing and consumption as
intrinsic to the everydayness of Aboriginal life in the Fitzroy
Valley--inform this article. (3) They do not, however, constitute its
whole. The lesser-known contribution of kin to assist and comfort
families when they suffer the harsh reality of the death of a loved one
can claim a distinctive place for inclusion in the description and
analysis here about jaminyjarti, a mourning ritual that requires daily
fishing activity. The place of fishing and fish in jaminyjarti, as
discussed below, tends to be overlooked when fishing constitutes the
research focus, including when the impact of fishing and natural
resource management more broadly are examined within the context of
climate change. As Close et al. (2013) cogently observe, there is an
increasingly urgent need to investigate Indigenous and non-Indigenous
fishing and the implications of 'heavily fished areas' in
current climate challenged contexts (p. 16; see also Leonard et al. 2013
for contemplation of climate change environmental impacts and Indigenous
adaptations in Australia's north).
In the discussion that follows, I draw on ethnographic data from
long-term field research with Indigenous Fitzroy Valley families and
communities to illustrate fish related activities as central to the past
and present reproduction of cultural life and kinship. This centrality
includes knowledge and understanding about, and active participation in,
mourning rituals, in part as a practical means to assist and comfort
bereaved relatives.
Writing about people's attachments to various forms of
material culture, but with reference to a very different cultural
context and emphasis, (4) Miller (2008) is helpful here where he shows
how the relationship between 'things' (used generically) and
people can create comforting patterns over time. He suggests that via
the reproduction of certain influences and activities 'at
particular times, certain traits and styles develop which come to
characterize them, not as individuals, but as networks of
relationships' (p. 293). He adopts the term 'the
aesthetic' not as a reference to the creative arts but to encompass
'pattern ... [and] ... the repetition of certain themes in entirely
different genres and settings' (2008:293). Broadly applied in an
'entirely different' location and topic, Miller's ideas
benefit conceptualization and characterization of the relationship and
interconnectedness between people, fishing and fish, especially in the
distressing contexts of death and grieving where ways and means to
provide comfort to bereaved relatives are crucial to individual and
family networks and wellbeing. These matters are elaborated below.
I begin with an overview of the Fitzroy Valley, including the
Fitzroy River, and then turn to local Aboriginal cultural life and
fishing, and a discussion about jaminyjarti that shows its importance to
the vitality of life, as well as its necessity following the anguish of
death.
WRITING ABOUT THE FITZROY VALLEY, AND ABOUT FISHING
The Fitzroy Valley region extends approximately 100 kilometres to
the east and the west of the Kimberley town of Fitzroy Crossing, which
is around 450 kilometres inland from the coastal town of Broome. (5) The
Valley encompasses the Fitzroy River, a waterway that is part of a major
'unregulated floodplain system in the wet-dry tropics ...'
(Close et al., p. 8; see also Storey 2006). The Fitzroy River, which
intersects with the Forrest and Margaret Rivers, and smaller waterways
such as Brooking Springs and associated creeks and billabongs, covers a
vast area of over 95,000 square kilometres. The Valley's heartland,
through which the Fitzroy River flows via Geikie Gorge, and town
communities such as Darlgunya, is the traditional homeland of the Bunuba
people. Gooniyandi people's land extends broadly east of Bunuba
country, and includes communities such as Muluja, Mimbi, Ngarlankadji
and Yiyili. (6)
Indigenous groups who migrated north to the Kimberley from their
Great Sandy Desert homelands between the late 1940s and the early 1960s
also reside in Fitzroy Valley communities. Notably, and not unusually
for a colonized population, many who migrated north were forcibly or
voluntarily moved from their traditional desert lands during the last
century. Some followed families who had migrated before them, as in the
case of Walmajarri artist, Jimmy Pike. His widow, author and
environmentalist Pat Lowe, writes about this movement in the case of
Pike and other Walmajarri families:
[Aboriginal people were] lured by the stories they'd heard of
the modern world, with its abundant supplies of food and water, its
mechanized transport, its variety of goods, during the 1940s and 1950s
people left the desert in small groups to taste the fruit for themselves
(Lowe 2012:9).
Those who 'foot walked' north from their desert homelands
looked for family, food and work (Richards, Hudson and Lowe 2002; see
also Marshall 1988 and Hawke 2013). When in the river country
traditionally owned in accordance with the principles and custodianship
inspired through Customary Law by the Bunuba and Gooniyandi,
desert-affiliated women, men and children continued to retain strong
cultural ties and stark affection for their desert lands. The words of a
Juwaliny-Walmajarri woman who, as a young girl, travelled north with her
family in the 1950s, help to explain a strong connection with, and
responsibility to care for, her traditional lands, including a
significant waterhole, or jila:
We were crying when we saw that place [when we returned to our
desert homelands], The waterholes were black with the kura [faeces]
of the camels. We had to clean that place out, clean out all the
kura and kumpu [urine]. We did that juju [ritual]. We tell the
water we're sorry, we're back now; we won't leave you for such a
long time again. When we leave that place, we tell the jila, [water
hole] 'don't worry, we'll come back, we'll see you next time ...'
In addition to Walmajarri and Juwaliny-Walmajarri people, other
desert migrants include people from the Mangala and Wangkajunga language
groups (Toussaint 1999, 2008; see also Toussaint et al. 2005). During
the last half century, there has been a great deal of intermarriage, and
sharing of resources, especially between Walmajarri and Gooniyandi
people. For example, Walmajarri people now co-exist with Gooniyandi in
communities excised from pastoral stations, such as at the Bayulu
Community on Gogo Station, and at the Jugerari (also known as Jukurirri)
Community on Cherrabun Station. It is also the case that most adults and
children continue to make a distinction and to identify as a
'river' or 'desert' person (Sullivan et al. 2012;
Toussaint 1999a, 2008; Toussaint et al. 2005) in ways that include
enactment of everyday social interactions in the Fitzroy Valley to the
recording of evidence in native title reports, such as in the 2007
Ngurrara Native Title Claim where language groups from Great Sandy
Desert locations constantly identified as 'desert people'
(National Native Title Tribunal, Ngurrara Determination, 2007).
Similarly, the Bunuba and Gooniyandi Native Title Claims involved
claimants who were listed and self-identified as 'river
people' (National Native Title Tribunal Determinations, 2013).
Fresh-water people such as the Bunuba and Gooniyandi also distinguish
themselves from 'salt-water' people who have traditional
affiliations along Western Australia's Kimberley coastline.
In contemporary settings, and within a complex range of life-styles
unified by a broad-based Indigenous and regional identity, what everyone
shares, regardless of whether individuals are members of desert groups
such as the Walmajarri, Juwaliny-Walmajarri, Mangala and Wangkajungka
who arrived in the latter part of the last century, or the Bunuba and
Gooniyandi as the traditional owners of the broader Fitzroy Valley
region and its intersecting rivers, is fishing and fish.
Traditionally, river people fished with nets and spears and they,
in turn and over time, taught fishing skills to desert migrants. A
Juwaliny-Walmajarri woman explains how this occurred:
As a young girl who grew up in the desert, ngaju [I] had to learn
about river life [when we were living on Gooniyandi land]. We had to
learn how to catch barramundi and catfish. We didn't have throw
nets, marlal [nothing]! We learnt how to fish with string or cotton and
old needles. We'd put needles in the fire; shape them like a little
hook. Gooniyandi people taught us these things ... (Toussaint et al.
2012:42-43).
Both river and desert people also used fish poison, a technique
that continues to be deployed today and which involves the use of bark
stripped from the locally grown majarla trees (Barringtonia acutangula,
freshwater mangroves) that is thrown into permanent pools to stun fish
causing them to rise to the surface so they can be readily caught
(Sullivan et al. 2012; Toussaint et al. 2005; Toussaint et al. 2012).
Intersecting socio-cultural, economic and emotional reasons
underpin why fishing is so widely practised in the Fitzroy Valley.
Contemplated further below, when preparing for a fishing trip, for
instance, families draw on different forms of local subsistence
knowledge and lived experience that derive meaning and authority from
inter-generations of learning. While not reliant on fishing for their
livelihood, families undertake a variety of work relating to fishing,
evident in the catching, cooking and sharing of fish, and the energy
expended to fulfill certain tasks and obligations. Local knowledge
talking points include conversations about prospective local fishing
spots where fish are known to be 'jumping', often resulting in
families driving to specific locations to explore local rivers and pools
to assess fishing potential with a view to returning to their
communities carrying advice to share with others.
Fishing activities and conversations also embody local aesthetics
and comforts, such as with reference to the water's transparency,
the type, colour and 'fatness' of certain fish species, and
the necessity and texture of adequate tree shade to camp under,
especially when the sun is high and temperatures reach 40 degrees
Celsius. The attainment of fishing bait, such as by grabbing small frogs
from nearby riverbanks and billabongs, under toilet bowls and behind
water pipes and tanks at communities, and/or the purchasing of chook
pellets as substitute bait at the local store, also derive keen
attention and rely on an acquired skill (see also Thorburn et al.
2004:46).
Regular shopping trips that draw on shared resources (money,
vehicles, lines, fuel) include the purchase of items such as flour,
tinned meat, and tea to enable a one or two-day fishing trip to unfold
where a successful outcome is anticipated rather than assured. The
re-telling of stories and comparing of memories about fish caught at
significant places, and whether sufficient swags (bed rolls) have been
packed, facilitate countless 'camping out' trips. A Gooniyandi
woman explains:
I have a history here and I grew up fishing ... Even young people
crave to go to the river. Any chance they get, nothing can replace
that [going to the river]. They might go into town [sometimes] but
the best part is going to the river. They jump at it! It's
everything for us. The grandchildren like swimming, fishing,
camping together, everything together. We take tea, damper; we give
the kids a really good time. Nothing will ever stop Aboriginal
people going to the river and fishing, that's our life. To live on
what we've been living on, pastoralists won't stop us. We can buy
things at the shop but that's just to keep us going when we can't
get to the river. That's the cycle of life for Aboriginal people.
When a fishing trip takes place and families organize to travel
together they drive to a chosen spot where a day or longer term (for
instance, a weekend) camp is established and adults and young people get
ready to fish by putting hooks on lines, and sinking or dragging nets in
the water to see what fish (including large river prawns, or cherrabun)
might become entangled. Other ways of trawling for prawns is practised
by women, as a Gooniyandi woman tells:
Do you know how we catch cherrabun? My jaja [grandmother] and other
women taught us. We sit down in the river, put little bit of meat
between our toes, meat for bait. Then we pull the skirt under our
feet so it fills up with water. That cherrabun smells the meat when
he's walking on the riverbed. He comes up under the skirt to get
the bait and that's when we pull the skirt tight; run out of the
water, and throw him on the sand, near the fire or fishing bucket.
That cherrabun, he's caught in our skirt! (7)
A young Bunuba woman's story also reveals how stories about
the river and fishing are transferred from one generation to the next;
My aunties introduced me to the river ... They told me to put mud
under my arms and they splashed water over my face. Another time, I
was only catching small bream so my auntie called out to the
spirits to give me a big bream. The next time I put my line in I
got a big bream, they [the spirits] could tell who I was then.
Another Bunuba woman tells a story about bait. Evident in her
narrative is what constitutes bait and the pronounced qualitative
difference between frozen and freshwater prawns:
We buy bait sometimes. We buy packets of prawns and diced meat. I
bought some prawns at the supermarket one time and one kartiya
[non-Aboriginal person] said, 'you going to cook those up for
dinner?' I said, no, that's bait for fishing'. He thought we were
going to cook and eat those frozen prawns!
Signs to look for when fish are biting, as well as learning about
how to catch and name fish, are among other activities, as is counting
and comparing the yield, talking about how many fish should be cooked on
the spot, or taken home to family members. In addition, there is the
preparation and cooking of the fish once caught: gutting and singeing it
when required, making a coal fire, building a bush oven, timing the
bake, turning the fish, and finding leaves and bark from local trees to
plate cooked fish (Toussaint 2010; Toussaint et al. 2005; Yu 2006). The
eating and sharing of fish, enjoying its tastiness, or comparing the
quality of one fish to another, marks the culmination of a good family
day, a point I develop below. All of these activities, whether seen on
their own as individual parts, or brought together as a whole, reveal
their experiential importance to those families who are directly
involved, as well as family members who are left behind at their
communities for reasons of sickness or age but who will inevitably
benefit from a fishing trip. For example, when fishers return with fresh
fish, an activity that also results in the sharing of fishing stories.
Knowledge about the widespread, intergenerational passion for
fishing, and the sociocultural and emotional emphases that underpin
fishing activities, also have the potential to provide a deepened
understanding about the everyday value of local cultural life. (8) None
of the above activities can be separated from the integrated cultural
whole: the act of fishing, and all that fishing embodies, represents a
consistent and unifying theme for Fitzroy Valley families and
communities. (9) A Walmajarri man, Nyari, whose family migrated from the
Great Sandy Desert into the Fitzroy Valley in the 1950s and 1960s, makes
plain the intrinsic value of fishing and fish to the comfort and the
sociality of family life:
When I go fishing, I just like to go because I can relax with
family, [and have a] bit of fun. We have a little bit of excitement
to go fishing. Get away from things; get away from town. My eldest
daughter likes looking for bait, but my youngest daughter likes
going for the big fish. She likes a bit of a challenge. I get a
real adrenalin rush when I go fishing and catch something. The only
other time I feel that is when we go hunting and get a goanna or
kangaroo. When you take the family, it's a good day out, away from
community, humbug, and we visit country. We tell stories about that
place, when we're there, when we're at that place. You know, talk
about when we were there last year, what we caught there. I like
having a good feed at the river, catching sawfish, cooking at the
river ... What I like is that you get everyone together in the one
fireplace, our homes aren't big enough and everyone is spread
around, you know, one family in one house over there, another one
somewhere else. With fishing, we're all sitting down at the one
fire. We can share one fireplace; catch up with family ...
Evident in Nyari's words is that the value of fishing and fish
is what is involved in the activity that surrounds it: being with family
and all that being with family entailed. The prospect of being able to
sit around the fireplace with loved ones, the excitement of successfully
chasing and catching a fish, and the quietness that fishing enabled when
people were together, infuse his story. It is the spatial and emotional
intricacy, as well as the intensity of time and associated activities
that fishing opens up, that matter most. Miller's (2008) framework
about recognizing the reflexive and integrated value of people's
interactions, alongside patterns of behaviour and the comfort that
material items provide, engender a useful framework here. In the case of
Nyari, there is an obvious joy about being with family, iteration about
familiar patterns associated with regular fishing activities, and fish
(and necessary lines, nets, bait) as generic yet interconnecting and
comforting 'things'.
Nyari's story also reveals that the type and size of caught
fish did not matter: the social value of fishing and fish is what
brought everyone together. This is commonly the case although there can
be occasions when fish size and type prompts an animated conversation,
as it can with fishers universally. Fish are rarely treated as a
commodity, or as material items that can be bought or sold, despite the
occasional possibility of fish sales to tourists. (10) One of the
reasons for this is that fish and fishing activity, alongside the river
and the landscape in which it is embedded, are bound up with the ethos
and practice of Customary Law, a body of thought and practice that is
tied into the Dreaming, which is known locally as Jumangkarni, or
Ngarrangkarni. A system of spiritual beliefs and behaviours that
encompasses a multitude of narratives that recount the creative
activities of mythic heroes, and guidelines for the behaviour of all
living beings, the Dreaming is described by senior Walmajarri man, Joe
Brown: 'Everything we know comes from what we call Ngarrangkarni
... People, even in towns, still know how to sing the story for their
country. They follow in their father and mother's footsteps ...
every jila [waterhole] has its own songs, stories and skin group
[sub-section] ...' (in Kimberley Aboriginal Law and Culture Centre,
2006, p. 37). (11)
Two senior Gooniyandi women expand the meaning embedded in Joe
Brown's comments within the context of the river and fishing:
We follow the law all along the river, Gooniyandi, Bunuba,
Walmajarri when they came in that riverside; they used to bury
people by putting them up on stilts, leave them in the trees ...
One old man's mother was buried near the river ... People had to
call out to the spirits if they go there. Her spirit will leave
them fish for a certain time only; then they had to leave ...
When we're getting ready for juju [ceremony] along the river, we
catch and share fish for ceremonies. It's culturally important for
us, all the water holes, we can't use some of those places; they're
tarruku [sacred] ...
The trading and exchange of fish, and other aquatic species, such
as mussels and fresh water prawns or cherrabun, for meat products also
occurs in Fitzroy Valley communities. Within the cultural oeuvre I am
presenting here, for example, pastoral station beef is traded for turtle
from 'salt-water' coastal communities (such as Bidyadanga and
One Arm Point on the west coast) for fish and other items. These
examples reveal not only their material, socio-cultural and exchange
value, however. A Gooniyandi woman explains: 'sometimes we send
killer [station beef] from here [Fitzroy Crossing] to One Arm Point in
exchange for a large turtle ...'. On other occasions, turtle will
be taken by road from One Arm Point to the Fitzroy Valley to assist in
celebratory events, such as a birthday. While there will be costs
expended by families for fuel and food when these occasions occur (the
distance between Fitzroy Crossing and the coast is a round road trip of
approximately 900 kilometres), these are not taken into account if the
turtle (or beef) is sent as a gift. It is, however, likely that at a
later stage the gift of turtle would be returned in the form of
something else, such as freshwater barramundi, to ensure that a familiar
pattern is reproduced. Culturally-mediated gestures like these highlight
that the gift-giving value of the exchange is equal to, if not more
than, its immeasurable qualitative value as a cherished material item.
The act of privileging resources in a variety of ways is also
evident when it comes to how people pool and allocate money to ensure a
fishing trip occurs.
Aboriginal communities in the Fitzroy Valley, like many other
Australian Indigenous populations, experience high levels of
unemployment (Kimberley Snapshot, 2011). Most adults are on a
comparatively low and fluctuating income that depends largely on the
biweekly payment of social security entitlements (for example. Old Age
Pension, Sickness Benefit, Disability Pension), and occasionally
monetary benefits from a solid win at cards, study support, contract
pastoral work, or the proceeds from selling an artwork, such as a
painting or a locally crafted artifact like a boomerang or ngurti
(coolamon, or small wooden bowl). It is also generally the case that
incomes are low whereas costs for food, fuel and other items (blankets,
clothes, and white goods, such as a refrigerator or air-conditioner) are
high due to living in an area where remoteness, cartage and storage adds
substantially to local price tags. Despite these limitations,
individuals and families regularly demonstrate how much fish and fishing
means by devoting a substantial amount of their income to enabling
family fishing trips to occur. To give just one example, on a three-day
fishing trip in 2011 in which I participated, two low-income families
(seven adults, five children and one dog) pooled around $300 to cover
fuel and food (fruit, tea, flour, baking powder, salt, eggs, tinned
milk, biscuits, potatoes, juice, and chook pellets for bait). In return,
three barramundi, three catfish, one sawfish and twelve bream were
caught at two Fitzroy River sites. Whilst the fish caught enabled
several meals to be cooked (smoked whole in a camp oven with potatoes on
one occasion, turned into a stew accompanied by separately cooked rice
on another) and consumed, what mattered most to those present was the
socio-cultural and emotional value of being together with family. As
Nyari (quoted above) put it, 'What I like [when we go fishing] is
that you get everyone together in the one fireplace ...', a
sentiment regularly captured in the comments, aspirations and activities
of other women, men and children. Clearly in such words and
illustrations, people go fishing as part of the sociality and emotion
that makes up everyday life in a much-loved local landscape that people
call home.
Fish and fishing symbolize the qualities of everyday life; but they
also symbolize and have value for the rituals and nurturing
responsibilities that surround death and mourning. It is here that
fishing and fish play an intrinsic part in how people comfort bereaved
loved ones during prolonged periods of grief.
FISHING, FISH AND JAMINYJARTI
Like societies everywhere, death and its aftermath result in an
intensity of emotional distress and sorrow for Fitzroy Valley women, men
and children. Long-held Customary Law inspired ideas inform beliefs that
materialize in activities following a death and practices relating to
comforting bereaved relatives, as well as ensuring a deceased's
spirit departs from grieving kin and the landscape. Jaminyjarti,
sometimes known locally as jaminy, (12) is a ritual that accompanies a
number of activities during periods of mourning: it restricts the eating
of animal meats by bereaved relatives both during and after the funeral.
Among Bunuba, Gooniyandi, Mangala, Juwaliny-Walmajarri, Walmajarri and
Wangkajungka people, jaminyjarti is regularly explained by local
people's reference to Jumangkarni, or the Dreaming, and the
requirements of Customary Law: jaminyjarti occurs because
'that's the Law ...'.
Tonkinson (1978), writing about the Mardudjara (also known as the
Martu) language group in Northern Western Australia's Western
Desert region, explains that the Dreaming is inspiration and authority
for the enactment of food taboos during mourning:
All close relatives become dadji; that is, they refrain from eating
plains-kangaroo, echnida, native cat, possum and dingo for a period
of one or two years or even longer. The only explanation for this
tabu is that it comes from the Dreamtime (p. 85). (13)
'Sorry business' is a term regularly evoked by Indigenous
people in the Kimberley and elsewhere to encompass death and funeral
activity (Toussaint 2008a; see also Langton 1991 and Glaskin et al.
2008). In Fitzroy Valley communities 'sorry business' is used
in conjunction with the term jaminyjarti or jaminy that is enacted and
has meaning for relatives after the death of a loved one. The ritual
practice can be understood as one aimed at managing people's
distress, comforting them during times of sorrow, and providing support
to help alleviate their grief. One of the most significant ways that
family members look after the bereaved is by cooking and presenting them
with a meal of freshly caught fish. (14)
Phyllis Kaberry, who undertook 1930s Kimberley field research, was
among the first to document the practice from the vantage point of
women. Discussing it under the heading of Mourning Taboos, Kaberry
wrote:
They [in this case, women] observe a taboo on meat mi-a:la, and
their diet is mainly limited to vegetable foods, small fish, snakes and
witchetty grubs (ladjel), the last two being never eaten by the rest of
the community, except once by the men during their initiation. The
mourning women may not even smell [animal] flesh, and if a kangaroo is
being roasted nearby, they stuff their nostrils with grass (1939, pp.
214-215; see also Toussaint 1999:51-52).
As in the past, in present circumstances the jaminyjarti ritual can
be relaxed several weeks after the funeral has taken place and visiting
relatives have returned to their communities and towns. The restriction
can also be sustained for many months, however, depending on when senior
relatives decide sufficient jaminy time has been enacted since a loved
one's death. (15) Reasons that influence senior decision-making
include whether an elderly person shows signs of suffering poor
nutrition due to the lack of long-term high-level protein usually
plentiful in the consumption of fresh, red meat (Akerman, 1975, provides
a fine-grained account where this occurred).
The fast is broken by the actions of a close male relative
(usually, an uncle) who smears the cooked fat of a deceased animal on
the lips of a grieving kinsperson. (16) The person in mourning will call
out loudly and openly weep in response to being released from the
restriction. The practice of release, which might occur when families
are eating together at home or in a small community setting, is
sometimes referred to as 'freeing' the bereaved. Writing
eighty years ago about this practice, Kaberry described the process
thus: 'The taboo is only relaxed when the deferred mourning
ceremonies are over; a male relative touches their mouths with the fat
of kangaroo and other meat and they are then permitted to eat it'
(1939:215).
In contemporary settings, bereaved relatives are restricted from
participating in other activities after a death, such as not being able
to return to their family home following a death there, again for
varying periods of time, and sometimes not at all (Toussaint 1999:85).
The name of a deceased person is usually suppressed, and others with the
same name can be referred to locally as kumunyjayi. (17) Close family,
especially widows, have their head hair shaved by female kin, and they
and other relatives are required to live at a nearby 'sorry
camp', a temporary shelter established so that grieving families
can be cared for several weeks prior to the funeral.
The home of a deceased, especially if he or she died there, also
requires careful attention. Family members select and then burn a small
branch and leaves from a local konkerberry (Carissa lanceolata) bush.
Kin chant a song as they trail the smouldering bush through a
deceased's house. Smoke filters from the wood and any leaves it
retains to ensure that the house is cleansed before another family can
start living there. The smoking ceremony, or ngunyjurr ritual, helps to
reassure and comfort grieving families that the deceased's spirit
is no longer worried about leaving family and lands. Smoke is also used
medicinally for a variety of ailments (Lowe and Pike 1990:54; see also
Toussaint 1999).
After a loved one's funeral, visitors return to their
homelands and communities. In many cases, families have travelled in
convoys of four-wheel drive vehicles from locations that are hundreds of
kilometers away, such as the Pilbara, around 1,000 kilometres south of
Fitzroy Crossing, or from coastal communities south of Broome. Meat
restrictions for distant kin will ease for some family members. Referred
to locally as 'jaminyjarti time', close loved ones will
continue to eat fish, as well as increase their intake of vegetable
foods such as karnti (potatoes), small game like snake, insects such as
witchetty grubs, and locally purchased canned or fresh foods, including
tinned fish.
A focus on the implications of death helps to explain various
aspects of Fitzroy Valley Indigenous life and the anguish that
accompanies extended periods of mourning. It also encourages ideas about
how persons related through family connections and through grief can be
understood as seeking to alleviate intense sorrow on the one hand, and
to generate comfort on the other. The material use of smoke to cleanse a
deceased's household, the shaving of hair to symbolize sorrow, and
the establishment of a 'sorry camp', are examples where a
certain familiarity and pattern of behaviour emerges after a death. A
focus on the implications of death also leads to a broader and deepened
understanding about how, why and when fish and fishing matter: fishing
occurs not only because it presents opportunities for families to get
together 'round the one fireplace': fishing also takes place
because of the high number of deaths that occur which, in turn, lead to
a high and consistent demand for fish when meat restrictions are
enacted. A Walmajarri woman puts it this way:
We always go fishing, one thing is to share fish with family ...
and then there's jaminy, we need to help jaminy people. If a family
doesn't have a vehicle, or they're old people, we like to help them
out. A lot of people don't like takeaway [fish], so we get it for
them. When it's funeral time, they have to have a little bit of
tinned fish first, then fresh fish. The fresh fish has to be
smoked, like the smoke ceremony at funeral time ... If we can't
catch fish, they have to eat bought fish that we cook for them. We
have to look after families when they're in mourning. Too much
sorry business everywhere ...
A Bunuba woman, who had suffered the loss of her husband several
years ago, continues to grieve: (18)
I can't eat meat [right now because it is], sorry business time ...
I eat fresh fish. I go fishing everyday; sometimes family get it
for me. I eat a little bit of tinned fish, if I have to, and
sometimes fish and chips from Ngiyili [local Bunuba-owned
roadhouse]. But mostly I get bream everyday from the river,
sometimes I keep fish in the freezer, we save it for a rainy day
[meaning when no fresh fish is available].
How families assist and support one another during times of
grieving is also evident in another Walmajarri woman's story. In
her account, it is plain that concerns about the need for fish were
relayed from one family to another, and that she willingly caught and
supplied the necessary fish. The pattern of sociality embedded in the
multilayered value of catching, cooking and distribution of local fish
is plain, as is her obvious pride in helping to comfort the bereaved
family. The material 'thing' that connected them was freshly
caught fish:
We heard that the family needed fish for jaminyjarti. I'm a good
fishing woman so they asked if I could help. I used crabmeat, crush
it, left it downstream, this was after warrambah [flood river]
time. I caught eight catfish; they were fat ones. These were cooked
on the spot by the daughters. I gave them the whole lot because
they needed it for their family, for funeral.
That fish replaces meat on occasions when it cannot be consumed
should not imply that fish and meat are of equivalent value: they are
simply different foods, one of which is needed during jaminy times to
fulfill a long-term practice associated with death and grieving. Hunting
for goanna and kangaroo are also much-loved activities but these usually
involve long-distance tracking where a few people only need to move
quietly and quickly in a way that is not always conducive to extended
family activities, especially when very young children and elderly,
perhaps frail, people are present and happy to stay at a designated
campsite. On the other hand, both old and young people can be present
during a 'camping out' trip associated with fishing. They can
participate in a variety of active and comforting ways that apply to
everyone present, such as looking after a hearth, cleaning caught fish,
searching for leaves and bark to plate the fish, and quietly encouraging
fishers, especially young children, to catch a good quantity of fish.
Within the context of jaminyjarti is the obvious tragedy it
represents for Fitzroy Valley families: an increasing reliance on
jaminyjarti reflects the extent to which premature death and death due
to age occurs. The shocking poignancy of this statement was heightened
not long ago when Nyapajarri, a Walmajarri woman, was lamenting the
first diagnosis of Asbestos-caused Mesothelioma in the region. Trying to
work out whether the disease could have escaped diagnosis before, and
how wide-spread it might be, led to a turn in the conversation when
Nyapajarri quietly said: 'Well, we've lost so many of our
people, we don't really know [about diagnoses], we've lost so
many, and we don't always know what they died from ...'.
Several interrelated matters arise from this discussion. The first
is that the calculated incidence of death in conjunction with numbers of
fish caught at certain times has not been investigated systematically or
spatially as Close et al. (2013) note, indicating that there is clearly
room for the pattern and implications of jaminyjarti to be recognized as
a factor in studies about fish numbers and environmental river flows.
The second is that the practice of jaminyjarti provides Indigenous
people with a means to comfort kin via the use, catching, cooking and
eating of fish during intense periods of sorrow. And the third
reason--the most important of all--is the unacceptably high morbidity
and mortality rates that are regularly calculated and give rise to local
and regional concern (Toussaint 2003, 2008a). Calma (2008) provides
national data regarding premature Indigenous death and death due to age,
but PHIDU (2007:7) presents Kimberley data, including information about
a high number of 'avoidable' deaths, and Morphy (2010:58)
states that the Fitzroy Valley population has a 'high
mortality' rate among 'adults from about the age of 40
onwards'. Data such as these reveal the shocking state of
people's health status. Behind the statistics, of course, are those
left to grieve: loved ones who mourn for the deceased and who try to
comfort and to console bereaved family members. One of the ways this
occurs is through the materialization and the practice of jaminyjarti.
CONCLUSIONS ABOUT FISHING FOR JAMINYJARTI, AND FOR LIFE
Fishing occurs as part of daily life for Fitzroy Valley Indigenous
groups: it is central to what brings people together 'round the one
fire place'. But just as it is crucial to life, fishing is central
to the anguish that surrounds death and its aftermath. There is a ritual
necessity, an emotional intensity, and a continuing cultural practice
for concerned kin to provide loved ones suffering 'sorry
business' with freshly caught and cooked fish in conjunction with
and often long after a funeral. Looking after 'jaminy people'
through the enactment of jaminyjarti reveals a great deal about death
and grieving in Fitzroy Valley communities. It also reveals a complex
and intrinsic yet not widely understood or documented part fish play in
aquatic, spatial and other environmental studies about fresh-water fish
and riparian environments (Close et al. 2013). Fishing regularly occurs
and is enjoyed by women, men and children as 'river' and
'desert' people in Fitzroy Valley communities: it provides
opportunities for families to spend time together on an everyday basis.
In the sorrow that permeates death, and the need to comfort those who
survive, fishing also fulfills jaminyjarti requirements. Miller's
(2008) discussion of the interconnecting significance of things and
persons that engender comfort in everyday lives helps to frame what is
at jaminyjarti's core, while not embracing its whole.
DOI: 10.1002/ocea.5034
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I am always grateful to, and mindful of. Indigenous Fitzroy Valley
individuals, families and communities for the way in which they
regularly scoop me into their Kimberley lives. I am especially indebted
to the Bayulu, Mimbi and Ngarlankadji communities, and to individuals
such as Marminjiya Joy Nuggett, Amy Ngurta Nuggett, Annette Puruta
Kogolo, Rosemary Nuggett, Topsy Chestnut, Jimmy Shandley, Barry Nuggett
and Sandy Cox. I appreciate very much the insights of Oceania editors
and three anonymous referees whose helpful comments on an earlier
version of this article have refined its qualities. The 2010 Report from
which a number of quotes have been included was from research conducted
through CSIRO Darwin for a Tropical Rivers and Coastal Knowledge project
focused on Indigenous Social and Economic Issues. Ethics approval for
the project was obtained through Charles Darwin University with support
from the Kimberley Land Council. I am also thankful to Arts Faculty
colleagues at The University of Western Australia for time and space to
write, and to CENRM's Paul Close for encouraging research that
crosses disciplinary boundaries.
REFERENCES
AKERMAN, K., 1975. Altered Food Taboos, Oceania 46(2): 122-125.
CALMA, T.. 2008. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social
Justice Commissioner's Annual Report, Sydney, Human Rights and
Equal Opportunity Commission.
CLOSE, P.G., R.J. DOBBS, D.J. TUNBRIDGE. P.C. SPELDEWINDE, D M.
WARFE. S. TOUSSAINT, and P.M. DAVIES, 2013. Customary and recreational
fishing pressure: large bodied fish assemblages in a tropical,
intermittent Australian river, Fresh Water Marine Research (in press).
GLASKIN, K.. M. TONKINSON, Y. MUSHARBASH, and V. BURBANK, (eds)
2008. Mortality, Mourning and Mortuary Practices in Indigenous
Australia, Surrey, Ashgate.
GOODALL, H. and A. CADZOW, 2009. Rivers and Resilience: Aboriginal
People on Sydney's Georges River, Sydney, University of New South
Wales Press.
HAWKE, S., 2013. A Town is Born: The Fitzroy Crossing Story, Broom,
Magabala Books.
JACKSON, S.. M. FINN, and P. FEATHERSTONE, 2012. Aquatic resource
use by Indigenous Australians in two tropical river catchments: the
Fitzroy River and Daly River, Human Ecology 40: 893-908.
JACKSON, S.. M. FINN, E. WOODWARD, and P. FEATHERSTONE. 2011.
Indigenous socio-economic values and river flows, report prepared for
the Tropical Rivers and Coastal Knowledge (TRaCK) project and CSIRO,
Darwin.
KABERRY, P.M., 1939. Aboriginal Woman Sacred and Profane, London,
George Routledge and Sons. (Republished by Routledge, London, in 2003.)
KIMBERLEY ABORIGINAL LAW AND CULTURE CENTRE, 2006. New Legend: A
story of law and culture and the fight for self-determination in the
Kimberley, published by KALaCC. Fitzroy Crossing.
KIMBERLEY LANGUAGE RESOURCE CENTRE, 1998. Thangani Bunuba--Bunuba
Stories, Halls Creek, Kimberley Language Resource Centre.
KIMBERLEY SNAPSHOT, Government of Western Australia, Department of
Training and Workforce Development, 2011, http://www.dtwd.wa.gov.au/awdc
LANGTON, M., 1991. 'Too Much Sorry Business'. Royal
Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody, Final National Report,
Appendix ix, Canberra, Government Printers.
LEONARD, S., M. PARSONS, K. OLAWSKY, and K. FRANCES, 2013. The role
of culture and traditional knowledge in climate change adaptation:
insights from the East Kimberley, Australia. Global Environmental
Change, Elsevier. http://dx.doi.Org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.02.012
LOWE. P. 2012. Jimmy Pike--c. 1940-2002. In Jimmy Pike's
Artlines: You call it desert, we used to live there, Exhibition
Catalogue, Bemdt Museum, Occasional Paper. Vanguard Press, pp. 9-12.
LOWE, P. and J. PIKE, 1990. Jilji, Broome, Magabala Books.
MARSHALL, P. 1988. Raparapa: 'now we go 'longside the
river', Broome, Magabala Books.
MILLER, D., 2008. The Comfort of Things, London, Polity Press.
MEGGITT, M., 1974. Desert People, London, Angus and Robertson.
MORGAN, D., M. ALLEN, P. BEDFORD, and M. HORSTMAN, 2004. Fish fauna
of the Fitzroy River in the Kimberley region of Western
Australia--including the Bunuba, Gooniyandi, Ngarinyn, Nyikina and
Walmajarri Aboriginal names. Records of the Western Australian Museum
22: 147-161.
MORGAN. D., G. ALLEN, B. PUSEY, and D. BURROWS, 2011. Freshwater
fishes of the Kimberley region, north-western Australia', Zootaxa
2816: 1-64.
MORPHY, F., 2010. Population, People and Place: The Fitzroy Valley
Population Project. Canberra, Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy
Research Working Paper 70/2010.
MUSHARBASH. Y., 2008. Yuendumu Everyday--Contemporary life in a
remote Aboriginal setting, Canberra, Aboriginal Studies Press.
2008a. Sorry Business is Yapa way: Warlpiri Mortality Rituals as
embodied practice. In Glaskin, K., Tonkinson, M., Musharbash, Y., and
Burbank, V. (eds) Mortality, Mounting and Mortuary Practices in
Indigenous Australia, Surrey, Ashgate, pp. 21-36.
NATIONAL NATIVE TITLE TRIBUNAL, 2007. Native Title Newsletter,
Ngurrara Determination, NNTT, Perth, November Issue, p. 10.
NATIONAL NATIVE TITLE TRIBUNAL, 2013. Gooniyandi Determination #1.
http://www.nntt.gov.au/
PUBLIC HEALTH INFORMATION DEVELOPMENT UNIT (PHIDU), 2007.
Population Health Profile of the Kimberley Division of General Practice:
supplement. Population Profile Series No. 108a, Australian Institute of
Health and Welfare, and The University of Adelaide.
RICHARDS, E. and J. HUDSON, 1990. Walmajarri-English Dictionary,
Darwin. Summer Institute of Linguistics.
RICHARDS, E., J. HUDSON, and P. LOWE, 2002. Out of the Desert:
Stories from the Walmajarri Exodus, Broome, Magabala Books.
STOREY, A., 2006. Ecological values of the Fitzroy River with links
to Indigenous cultural values, in Kimberley Appropriate Economies
Roundtable, Forum Proceedings, edited by Hill, R., Golson, K., Lowe, P.,
Mann, M., Hayes, S., and Blackwood, J. Cairns, Australian Conservation
Foundation, pp. 47-49.
SULLIVAN, P, H. BOXER, W. BUJIMAN, and D. MOOR, 2012. Bringing life
to the Desert of the South West Kimberley, in Country, Native Title and
Ecology, edited by Jessica K. Weir, Canberra, ANU e-press, pp. 47-57.
THORBURN, D., D. MORGAN, H. GILL. M. JOHNSON, H. WALLACE-SMITH, T.
VIGILANTE, I. CROFT, and J. FENTON, 2004. Biological and cultural
significance of the freshwater sawfish (Pristis microdon) in the Fitzroy
River, Kimberley, Western Australia. Report to the Threatened Species
Network, Perth.
TONKINSON, R., 1978. The Mardudjara Aborigines: Living the Dream in
Australia's Desert, New York, Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
TOUSSAINT, S., 1999. Phyllis Kaberry and me: anthropology, history
and Aboriginal Australia, Melbourne, Melbourne University Press.
1999a. Kimberley Peoples, in Hunters and Gatherers, edited by
Richard B. Lee and Richard Daly, pp. 339-343.
2003. 'Our shame, Blacks live poor, die young':
Indigenous health practice and ethical possibilities for reform, in
Health, Social Change and Communities, edited by Pranee Liamputtong and
Heather Gardner. Melbourne, Oxford University Press, pp. 241-256.
2008. Kimberley Friction: complex attachments to water-places in
northern Australia, Oceania 78(1): 46-61.
2008a. Climate Change, Global Warming and Too Much Sorry Business,
The Australian Journal of Anthropology 19(1): 84-88.
2009. For Whom the Fitzroy River Flows: a fluctuating analysis of
social and environmental sustainability and incremental sovereignty, in
Water, Sovereignty and Borders in Asia and Oceania, edited by Delveena
Ghosh, Heather Goodall, and Stephanie Hemelryk Donald, London,
Routledge, pp. 174-188.
2010. Fitzroy Valley Indigenous groups and the multi-criteria value
of fishing and fish, unpublished report for Tropical Rivers and Coastal
Knowledge (TRaCK) and CSIRO, Darwin.
TOUSSAINT, S., with M. NUGGETT and A. KOGOLO, 2012. Ngurtakura
Wangki: Amy's Story (unpublished manuscript).
TOUSSAINT, S., P. SULLIVAN, and S. YU, 2005. Waterways in
Aboriginal Australia, Anthropological Forum 15(1): 61-74.
YU, S., 2006. Cultural studies of the Fitzroy River, WA, in
Kimberley Appropriate Economies Roundtable, Forum Proceedings, edited by
Hill, R., Golson, K., Lowe, P, Mann, M., Hayes, S., and Blackwood, J.
Cairns, Australian Conservation Foundation, pp. 135-139.
Sandy Toussaint (1)
The University of Western Australia
NOTES
(1.) Anthropology, The University of Western Australia.
(2.) Morgan's work also resulted in a series of fish posters
that included images and names of various fish species in Indigenous
languages such as Bunuba, Gooniyandi, Nyikina, Ngarinyn and Walmajarri.
See wwwscieng.murdoch.edu.au/centres/fish.
(3.) My ethnographic focus is on Northern Aboriginal Australia,
most specifically the Fitzroy Valley in the Kimberley region of Western
Australia's north. A range of research reports and publications
address historical and contemporary matters relating to Indigenous
people and fishing. Goodall and Cadzow (2009), for instance, provide a
series of fishing stories recorded from Aboriginal people in relation to
Sydney's Georges River in New South Wales. It is not, however,
within the article's purview to consider other Australian regions
in which Indigenous people are in the majority, as they are in the
Fitzroy Valley (Morphy 2010). My primary aim is to discuss fishing
beyond its everyday qualities and as central to mourning rituals in
Australia's north. The matter of grieving and fishing is not
examined in the relevant southern Australian literature I have reviewed.
(4.) Miller's primary focus is on various forms of sociality
and cultural life in contemporary London households. His context and
mine are vastly different but the ideas about what constitutes comfort
among persons overtime are fruitful. One of Miller's chapters, or
'Portraits', is about an Australian Aboriginal man living in
London. Titled 'The Aboriginal Laptop' it concentrates on
'Malcolm' who is exploring ways to connect to his past and
present identity, and family, through archival material and digital
technology, each of which are regarded as culturally comforting
'things'.
(5.) Toussaint 1999, 1999a, 200B, 2009 and Toussaint et al. 2005,
provide further ethnographic material about Fitzroy Valley Indigenous
communities. See also Toussaint 2010 for additional data about fishing
and fish in a report that contains research undertaken for the Tropical
Rivers and Tropical Knowledge (TRaCK) consortium. A number of quotes in
this article have been extracted from the 2010 report. None has been
published elsewhere.
(6.) Language areas are complex and approximate only. While I do
not wish to indicate that areas are fixed, I do want to stress that they
are locally known and respected by local Indigenous groups. The National
Native Title Tribunal web site provides information on the 2007 Ngurrara
and 2012 Bunuba and 2013 Gooniyandi Native Title Determinations. See
http://www.nntt.gov.au/Pages/default.aspx.
(7.) Women wear cotton skirts, usually with an elastic waist and
large pockets, and shirts when fishing and/or swimming in the river or
nearby billabongs. Shorts or long pants are sometimes worn. Bathers are
never worn. Hand lines are used to catch cherrabun.
(8.) Yasmine Musharbash (2008) provides a rich account of
'everyday' life at the Yuendumu Community in Central
Australia. Some parallels can be drawn between Musharbash's work
and a number of Fitzroy Valley communities, although the locations and
logistics differ.
(9.) I have only ever encountered one woman who said she was not
interested in fishing. Her family explained that she was having an
unhappy love affair and was not interested in doing anything much at the
time. I am aware of other occasions where people were too physically ill
or old to participate in fishing activities. Nonetheless, their interest
and desire to fish, and a healthy taste for fish remained, made obvious
by families delivering fish to their home.
(10.) The selling of fish is not an acceptable practice, partly
because of Customary Law requirements and local sociality, but also
because people prefer to go fishing themselves and commit any money they
have into resources such as lines, nets, hooks, bait and fuel so that a
fishing trip can take place.
(11.) See also the Kimberley Language Resource Centre's
Thangani Bunuba (1998), Toussaint et al. (2005), Yu (2006) and Sullivan
et al. (2012) for further detail about ritual beliefs and practices
related to local wildlife in the Kimberley.
(12.) Walmajarri linguists Eirlys Richards and Joyce Hudson (1990)
explain that the words jaminyjarti and jaminy are used interchangeably
and generally define 'a bereaved person who is fasting' (p.
25). Jaminy should not be confused with jarriny, which refers to a
person's conception totem, although some people's jarriny is
fish species, e.g. a catfish.
(13.) Tonkinson (1978) adds that one man suggested the
'deceased's spirit may decide to inhabit the body of these
animals, so close relatives avoid the risk of eating the dead person in
human form' (p. 85). He does not list foods Mardudjara could eat
during restricted mourning times. It is likely that desert groups who
migrated into the Fitzroy Valley adopted fish into the jaminy diet
instead of other local wildlife to replace restrictions on red meat.
(14.) Sullivan et al. (2012) also comment on the extent of fishing
practices among Walmajarri people at Yakanarra, a Fitzroy Valley
community, 'during mourning times when meat is forbidden' (p.
50). While the article presents an insightful overview of fish poisoning
techniques, no further mention is made of food taboos.
(15.) Some people choose to retain a jaminyjarti status despite
being told by relevant kin that it is no longer required. A senior
Bunuba woman, for instance, explained that she so missed her late
husband she intended to remain on a fish diet for as long as she felt
the need to do so.
(16.) Meggitt's work with the Walpiri (also spelt Warlpiri) of
Central Australia in the late 1960s does not discuss food taboos
following death but states that the widow of a deceased was restricted
from talking. When senior men decided it was time to relax the
restriction, 'Each man strikes her on the head with his switch and
rubs some food on her mouth in order to "open it". The widow
eats a portion of the food and the men eat the rest. She gives one last
wail and returns to the widows' camp; she may now talk freely'
(p. 329). See also Musharbash (2008a) for a contemporary account of
death and grieving rituals among the Warlpiri.
(17.) The use of kumunjayi is extended to a person who has the same
name of the deceased. Kumunjayi is used extensively throughout
Aboriginal Australia. A first name only will be replaced. If a deceased
were called 'Ruby', for instance, everyone in the community
with the name Ruby would be given, and have to use, an alternative first
name. See also Tonkinson 1978, pp. 84-85, about the Mardudjara where the
practice is discussed.
(18.) In many ways, it could be argued that fishing for relaxation,
recreation and as a form of comfort after a long period of mourning
helps a jaminy person. Not everyone returns to fishing for himself or
herself.