首页    期刊浏览 2025年06月10日 星期二
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Afterword: Vanuatu Perspectives on Research.
  • 作者:Regenvanu, Ralph
  • 期刊名称:Oceania
  • 印刷版ISSN:0029-8077
  • 出版年度:1999
  • 期号:September
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:Blackwell Publishing Limited, a company of John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  • 摘要:The initiative to develop the VCRP and to lift the moratorium was, rather, the result of a number of practical concerns. By the early-1990s, the post-Independence state-sponsored discourse of an indigenous or Melanesian form of development for Vanuatu was in the final stages of being replaced by a more orthodox and globally-sanctioned approach to national development. The push to adopt more Western conceptions of social improvement dovetailed with the passing away of the last generation of ni-Vanuatu able to claim to have been born into kastom (prior to conversion to Christianity). For the Cultural Centre, the fulfilment of its mandate to preserve, protect and develop kastom was becoming ever more pressing and urgent. The need to record aspects of traditional cultures now known by only the oldest generation, to foster an interest in learning these customs in the younger generation and to raise awareness at all levels of the importance and value of kastom, were tasks increasingly beyond the capacities of the predominantly Vila-based staff of the Cultural Centre and its volunteer fieldworker network.
  • 关键词:Anthropological research;Cultural policy

Afterword: Vanuatu Perspectives on Research.


Regenvanu, Ralph


The lifting of the moratorium on 'cultural' research in Vanuatu in 1994 was made possible by the Council of Ministers' endorsement of a new national cultural research policy, the Vanuatu Cultural Research Policy (VCRP). 1 [1] The Policy itself was drafted at the Vanuatu Cultural Centre in 1992, and then circulated for comment to the Cultural Centre's fieldworkers, the eleven regional chiefs' councils, relevant government departments (Womens' Affairs, Curriculum Development, Archives), and statutory and non-government organisations (National Council of Chiefs, National Council of Women). It was also sent for comment to locally-based research bodies (ORSTOM, University of the South Pacific) and a selected number of researchers based in overseas research institutions. In its objective of ensuring collaboration between foreign researchers and ni-Vanuatu to their mutual benefit, the policy did not negate the concerns that had prompted the imposition of the research moratorium a decade earlier. In fact, these conce rns -- that kastom belongs to ni-Vanuatu and that this must be respected by outsiders -- have become significantly more pertinent today.

The initiative to develop the VCRP and to lift the moratorium was, rather, the result of a number of practical concerns. By the early-1990s, the post-Independence state-sponsored discourse of an indigenous or Melanesian form of development for Vanuatu was in the final stages of being replaced by a more orthodox and globally-sanctioned approach to national development. The push to adopt more Western conceptions of social improvement dovetailed with the passing away of the last generation of ni-Vanuatu able to claim to have been born into kastom (prior to conversion to Christianity). For the Cultural Centre, the fulfilment of its mandate to preserve, protect and develop kastom was becoming ever more pressing and urgent. The need to record aspects of traditional cultures now known by only the oldest generation, to foster an interest in learning these customs in the younger generation and to raise awareness at all levels of the importance and value of kastom, were tasks increasingly beyond the capacities of the predominantly Vila-based staff of the Cultural Centre and its volunteer fieldworker network.

Moreover, some changes had occurred in attitudes towards foreign researchers. During the period of the moratorium a number of foreign researchers were invited to assist in the development of Cultural Centre programs. These included Darrell Tryon, who has conducted the annual men fieldworkers workshops since 1981; Lissant Bolton, who was invited to initiate the Women's Culture Project in collaboration with the head of that project, Jean Tarisesei; and David Roe and Jean-Christophe Galipaud's management of the Vanuatu Cultural and Historic Sites Survey (VCHSS). Roe and Galipaud collaborated extensively with fieldworkers in registering cultural sites between 1990 and 1995. The experience of working with these people sustained the belief in the cultural administration in Vanuatu -- from Government to the Cultural Centre to the fieldworkers -- that it was indeed possible for non-indigenes to conduct cultural research in a manner that involved, respected and acknowledged their informants and was of benefit to the people and communities which it involved. The provision of opportunities for the further training of Cultural Centre staff and fieldworkers and increased access to funding for this training and additional programs of research (factors stressed by the researcher lobby) were also instrumental in motivating the institution of the VCRP.

The lifting of the research moratorium, then, was not effected for the purpose of encouraging a rejuvenation of academic discourse about Vanuatu's cultures and societies, although as this volume attests, this has been one of its outcomes. It remains a fact that the great majority of ni-Vanuatu will never read this collection or other publications produced by professional researchers. The body of knowledge currently being generated will augment the academic discourse about Vanuatu which has always been conducted and constructed outside it in the metropolitan countries: earlier this century this may have been in Cambridge or Sydney, today it is centred at the Australian National University. While this discourse may only ever affect the lives of the subjects of research to a limited extent (if at all), it is the objective of the VCRP to ensure that, at other levels more directly relevant to their own lives, ni-Vanuatu can perceive research as an exercise over which they have some control, in which they can mean ingfully participate, and from which they can benefit.

In according itself a central role in the implementation of the VCRP, the Cultural Centre has also been able to effect its own objectives through the work of foreign researchers. The first of these is to ensure the central role of fieldworkers and local counterparts in social and cultural research in Vanuatu. As this volume demonstrates, the development of individuals based in their own communities who are conversant with the methodologies, concepts and rationales of academic research enhances both academic discourse and the maintenance of strong cultural identities at a local level. The Vanuatu Cultural Centre priority is that ni-Vanuatu should be the ones researching their own culture and society, and fieldworkers working alongside non-indigenous researchers indeed feel that this is what they are doing. The discourse on kastom that exists in Vanuatu, principally constructed and contested by the fieldworkers, the various chiefs' councils and the Cultural Centre, has been and continues to be enhanced by fiel dworkers' experiences in working alongside their expatriate counterparts.

The researchers represented in this collection have all demonstrated a commitment to the ethics and principles of the VCRP and are endorsed as good examples of the kinds of research and research collaborations the Cultural Centre wishes to encourage in Vanuatu. Lissant Bolton was instrumental in assisting the establishment of the Women's Culture Project and the women fieldworkers network of the Cultural Centre, not least through working with and training Jean Tarisesei. She has also conducted the annual women fieldworkers workshops since their inception in 1994. Darrell Tryon, similarly, has been conducting the annual men fieldworkers workshops since 1981, and has provided substantial training in writing vernacular dictionaries for the fieldworkers in the course of these workshops.

The ANU-Vanuatu Cultural Centre Archaeology Project, initiated under the direction of Matthew Spriggs, has seen Spriggs, Stuart Bedford and Meredith Wilson all contribute significantly to the training of Cultural Centre staff and fieldworkers in archaeological methodologies. Over the past three years, Spriggs has helped secure funding for and has run an annual six-week training course in archaeological excavation techniques. Vanuatu Cultural and Historical Site Survey, National Museum, and Women's Culture Project staff have benefited from this training, as have at least 15 fieldworkers. Stuart Bedford assisted in conducting these courses in 1996 and 1997. Meredith Wilson has worked with and trained staff and fieldworkers in rock art recording and classifying techniques, and assisted in securing funding for and running a rock art conservation training course for staff and fieldworkers in 1998.

Catriona Hyslop is now working as an Australian-sponsored volunteer with the Cultural Centre, travelling in the islands to conduct workshops and otherwise assist fieldworkers and other interested local counterparts in writing their own languages. This project of intensive and field-based linguistic training was requested by the fieldworkers at a 1997 Cultural Centre dictionary-making workshop which was co-ordinated by linguist Nick Thieberger, who was a volunteer at the Cultural Centre at that time. Greg Rawlings has provided substantial assistance to Wilson Kaluat and the Pango Cultural and Language Committee, undertaking research on archives in Australia and bringing copies of old photographs and manuscripts back to the village as requested by the Committee. Tim Curtis' work with Longdal Nobel Masingyau in south-west Malakula was the answer to Longdal's long-standing request that a researcher be found to assist him in the task of documenting the language and kastom of the Na'hai culture. In the event, Tim was also able to assist Longdal to establish the Na'hai Cultural Centre, the first language-based cultural centre in Vanuatu, which was opened in late 1998.

What then is the future of research by foreign researchers in Vanuatu? The Cultural Centre remains one of the only indigenous research institutions in Vanuatu, and is unique in the region for the extent to which it has fostered research by local community members into their own societies. The research represented in this volume has been successful for the extent to which it has assisted the Cultural Centre, its fieldworkers and other ni-Vanuatu research counterparts to meet their own objectives through collaboration with outside researchers. As a new set of circumstances prompted the lifting of the research moratorium, so new challenges will continue to change the priorities and expectations that the Cultural Centre has for socio-cultural research by foreigners in the country.

For example, the level of core funding support for staff salaries at the Centre will determine its ability to effectively monitor the conduct and work of researchers in the field, especially in areas without fieldworkers, and may affect the number of research permits granted. In terms of technical capacity, the dearth of ni-Vanuatu graduates in the field of the social sciences, and lack of Government support for scholarships in this area, mean that the building of the cultural heritage administration in Vanuatu will continue to occur on an ad-hoc and semi-professional basis (which nevertheless, as the fieldworker experience has demonstrated, has been highly effective). Changes in ni-Vanuatu society will also continue to change the emphases and foci of the Cultural Centre's programs. The institution of the Women's Culture Project in 1994, the Vanuatu Young People's Project in 1997 and a series of research projects in the area of traditional resource management since 1996 exemplify this.

The idea that socio-cultural research can be beneficial for both the nation and for rural communities, and the idea that such research by outsiders, especially non-ni-Vanuatu, can be conducted in a non-exploitative way, are ideas that are still gaining ground in Vanuatu. The VCRP, similarly, is still being developed and refined on the basis of the Cultural Centre's ongoing experiences with foreign researchers. It is hoped that the collaborative tradition demonstrated in this volume will be followed by other researchers interested in working in Vanuatu.

NOTES

(1.) The Vanuatu Cultural Research Policy can be viewed at the Cultural Centre's web page: http://artalpha.anu.edu.au/web/are/vks/vks.htm
联系我们|关于我们|网站声明
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有