Russia and Algeria: partners or competitors?
Katz, Mark N.
Russian-Algerian relations had been relatively subdued before 2006.
In that year, however, their ties expanded markedly. Russian President
Vladimir Putin visited Algeria in March 2006. At that time, major
agreements on Russian arms sales to Algeria as well as a settlement of
Algeria's debt to Russia were announced. Further, Gazprom and the
Algerian state gas company, Sonatrach, signed a memorandum of
understanding in August 2006 that has exacerbated European fears that
Russia and Algeria (two of the three principal EU gas suppliers) will
collude to raise the price of gas. Yet, while the improvement in
Russian-Algerian ties has been dramatic, there appear to be limits on
the extent to which they can collaborate, especially in the natural-gas
sphere, where their interests seem to be more competitive than
cooperative.
Soviet-Algerian relations had been close during the 1970s and
1980s, when Moscow was the main arms supplier to Algeria. The Russian
press estimates that Moscow supplied $11 billion in military equipment
to Algeria between 1962 and 1989, (1) equal to 70-80 percent of
Algeria's inventory. (2) These weapons were paid for primarily
through $11 billion in loans that the USSR extended to Algeria. (3)
During the 1990s, however, Russian-Algerian cooperation ceased as both
governments wrestled with serious internal problems. (4) Although
Algeria paid down much of its Russian debt (in goods), it stopped making
payments to Moscow in 1998 (even though it continued making payments to
its other creditors). (5) Shortly after Putin became president,
Nezavisimaya gazeta noted unhappily that Algeria had joined NATO's
"Mediterranean Dialogue," along with Egypt, Israel, Jordan,
Morocco, Tunisia and Mauritania. (6)
Putin became president of Russia only a few months after Abdelaziz
Bouteflika became president of Algeria in April 1999. The two new
leaders soon made an initial attempt to revive bilateral relations.
Russian Foreign Minister Igor Ivanov visited Algiers in 2000, and
President Bouteflika visited Moscow in 2001. (7) On the latter occasion,
Putin and Bouteftika signed a strategic-partnership declaration,
"the first such document Moscow has signed with an Arab
country." (8) (Moscow may have seen this as countering, if not
negating, Algeria's membership in NATO's Mediterranean
Dialogue.) The two sides talked about the resumption of Russian arms
sales and Russian involvement in the modernization of various Algerian
industries, including the fuel and power sectors. Although the two sides
disagreed on the size of the Algerian debt to Russia, the Algerian
government at least recognized that it owed Moscow something. Bouteflika
invited Putin to visit Algeria, and Putin promised that he would do so.
(9) Also in 2001, Russia agreed to sell 22 Su-24 MKs to Algeria. (10)
Despite all this, "the subsequent three years," as the
Russian ambassador to Algeria put it, "failed to bring the expected
results," (11) although two Russian firms, Stroitransgaz and
Zarubezhvodstroi, operated in Algeria during this period. Beginning in
2005, though, the increase in high-level visits indicated that relations
were picking up. Security Council Secretary Igor Ivanov, for example,
visited Algeria in March 2005 and February 2006, while Foreign Minister
Sergei Lavrov went there in November 2005. High-level Algerians also
visited Moscow. In addition, Putin and Bouteflika had several bilateral
meetings while both were attending or observing multilateral
conferences. (12)
Putin's visit to Algeria took place March 9-10, 2006, after he
had stopped first in Morocco and before he went on to Tunisia. According
to Vremya novostei, he was the first top-level Russian leader to visit
Algeria since Soviet President Nikolai Podgorny (who was largely a
figurehead) in 1969. (13) The debt issue was resolved by Moscow's
agreeing to completely write it off in exchange for Algeria's
agreeing to purchase industrial goods from Russia "in an amount at
least equal to the amount of the written-off debt" (which the
Russian press put at $4.7 billion). (14) In addition, Algeria agreed to
purchase $7.5 billion in military equipment and services from Russia:
$3.5 billion for Su30 MKIs, MiG-29SMTs and Yak-130 trainers; and $4
billion for tanks, antitank missiles, other armaments and repairs of
Algerian naval vessels. Rossiyskaya gazeta claimed, "This is the
biggest single contract in the field of military-technical cooperation
in Russian post-Soviet history." (15) What is more, these military
contracts apparently don't count toward the $4.7 billion in
nonmilitary purchases that Algeria expects to make from Russia in
exchange for the debt write-off.
In addition to the $7.5 billion in arms contracts, Moscow's
NTV Mir reported that railway contracts worth more than $5 billion were
also signed at this time. (16) But while executives from Gazprom and
several Russian oil companies accompanied Putin to Algiers, no business
agreements were signed. One Russian news report indicated that this
would occur in April. (17) It was not until early August, however, that
the long-anticipated Gazprom-Sonatrach MOU was finally signed. Precisely
what it entailed, though, was not clear; Interfax, for example,
described its contents in very general terms:
The memorandum envisions the possibility of exchanging assets in
the exploration and extraction sphere, the creation of joint
ventures, participation in tenders to explore and extract oil and
gas, information exchanges about projects, including projects
related to liquefied natural gas (LNG), the optimization of gas
supplies to the market, research activities, professional training
and an increase in the qualification of employees at the two
companies. (18)
An agreement was also signed by Sonatrach and Lukoil on cooperation
in the oil sphere. (19)
While Europe currently produces 60 percent of the gas it consumes
(with the UK, Holland and Norway being the biggest producers), it
imports 40 percent of its gas needs from outside the region. Russia
currently provides two-thirds of these imports. (20) Some European
countries (mainly in Eastern and Central Europe) are heavily dependent
on Russia for gas supplies. Others are heavily dependent on Algeria.
Italy in particular is dependent on both. (21) Previous calls by Putin
as well as Gazprom for the creation of a gas cartel similar in function
to OPEC, the oil cartel, have led to European concern that Russia and
Algeria, in particular, will act together to raise the price that
Europeans must pay for gas. (22) The Russian-Ukrainian gas dispute of
January 2006 (which led to a temporary drop in Russian gas supplies to
Europe), Putin's visit to Algeria in March 2006, and the August
2006 Gazprom-Sonatrach MOU heightened European concerns about gas
prices, especially since Europe's dependence on gas imports is
expected to increase over time. (23)
On May 23, 2006, for example, Britain's Financial Times ran an
article citing Putin's former economic adviser, Andrei Illarionov,
warning of "a new form of gas cartel ... being developed by Russia
and Algeria." (24) On June 29, 2006, Le Monde warned that Gazprom
"is forging energy cooperation with Algeria, which could in the
long run threaten the Europeans' room for maneuver." (25)
After the signing of the Gazprom-Sonatrach MOU in early August, the CEO of Italian energy company Sorgenia "called on the Rome government
to open negotiations on the importing of natural gas from countries
other than Russia and Algeria." (26)
In contrast to this alarm, several petroleum analysts cast doubt on
both the ability and the willingness of Russia and Algeria to work
together to raise gas prices. Africa Energy Intelligence, for example,
said that the August 2006 Gazprom-Sonatrach MOU "appears to be
merely a preliminary and vague agreement.... In the past, Sonatrach has
signed the same type of agreement with RoyalDutch/Shell and Statoil, but
they failed to produce concrete results." (27) Worm Gas
Intelligence pointed out that, while Gazprom is just starting to get
into the LNG market, Sonatrach is a well-established player "that
could provide stiff competition as Gazprom works its way into the
market." (28) Datamonitor noted that there already exists a Gas
Exporting Countries Forum (GECF), whose members (which include both
Russia and Algeria) account for 73 percent of world gas reserves and 42
percent of production, but called it nonetheless little more than a
"debating forum." Furthermore, "fears that the GECF is
planning to become a gas version of OPEC would appear to be unfounded.
Even if the organization's strenuous denials were not to be taken
at face value, the nature of both the GECF and the gas market make
influencing prices through the controlling of supply a difficult-if not
impossible-task under current market conditions and structures."
(29) A Financial Times article suggested that "the threat of
anything like a gas OPEC developing outside the EU comes as a convenient
additional justification for those energy companies seeking
consolidation inside the EU, such as Gaz de France and Suez." (30)
Of course, merely because outside analysts think that
Russian-Algerian cooperation could not succeed in raising gas prices is
no indication that the two countries will not attempt to do so. There is
reason to believe, though, that they might not even try since they
appear to recognize that they have differing interests. For example, the
Algerian energy minister, Chakib Khelil, saw the January 2006
Russian/Ukrainian gas crisis as being harmful to Algeria's
interests. "The risk from this conflict is greater in the long term
on the producers and exporters of natural gas who supply Europe via gas
pipelines, such as Algeria and Norway," he argued, since this would
result in Europe's "setting up a policy of diversification of
its supply sources." This would deprive existing suppliers of a
significant share of their market. (31) He predicted that "the EU
is going to learn a lesson from this incident and will diversify its
sources [for importing] liquefied gas from states which have the
potential to supply the EU." (32) Egypt, Qatar and Nigeria were
suppliers to which he foresaw the Europeans turning. (33) Clearly,
Algeria did not appreciate Moscow's precipitation of this crisis,
which it saw as harmful to Algerian interests.
For their part, the Kremlin and Gazprom could not have been pleased
by Algerian Energy Minister Khelil's February 2006 statement:
"From Italy, Algerian gas ... can be distributed throughout Europe,
and that is what I have promised the countries in Eastern Europe, such
as Poland, which are looking for alternatives to supplies from
Russia." (34) Worse still (from Moscow's perspective), he
suggested that in order for Algeria to gain the cooperation of other
parties to transmit Algerian gas from Italy to Eastern Europe, "it
will be necessary to drop from the current market price." (35)
The inception of Algerian gas exports to Eastern Europe would, of
course, weaken Gazprom's dominance over those markets. What this
suggests is that Gazprom's motive for reaching an agreement with
Sonatrach may not have been aimed at raising the price of natural gas
but simply at preventing Sonatrach from undertaking actions that would
serve to reduce either gas prices or Russian gas sales to Europe.
Further, Gazprom CEO Alexei Miller made it clear that an area in
which he especially hoped for cooperation with Algeria was the
construction of gas-liquefaction facilities in Russia, something with
which he saw Algeria as having "a good amount of experience."
(36) Algeria's agreeing to do this, of course, would increase
Russia's ability to export LNG and hence compete with Sonatrach in
this market. It still, of course, might make sense for Algeria to agree
to this; if Russia is going to buy this technology from somebody,
Algeria may as well be the one. What this indicates, though, is that
even if Algeria does help Russia build up its gas-liquefaction capacity,
their interests will be more competitive than cooperative in the long
run.
In addition, Gazprom hopes to help Libya develop its gas
reserves--described by ITAR-TASS as the fourth-largest in Africa but
mostly untapped (37)--which would allow Gazprom to benefit from enabling
Libya to compete with Algeria. Following the Libyan-American
rapprochement, it is inevitable that some outside company will receive a
contract to help Libya develop its gas reserves. Gazprom's
eagerness to help develop them, though, suggests that it will not forgo
an opportunity to profit even if this results in the potential reduction
of Algeria's share of the European gas market.
Beyond these signs that Russian and Algerian gas interests are more
competitive than cooperative, there are other irritants to their
relationship. While most of the Russian press coverage of the March 2006
Putin visit to Algeria was highly positive, there was one Nezavisimaya
gazeta article that gave a strikingly negative assessment of it:
When at last, as a result of very
difficult discussions, we nonetheless
expressed readiness to write off the
Algerian debt to the tune of $4.7
billion, they did not throw themselves
at our feet in gratitude, however much
we would have liked them to. Algeria
... rapped the Russians very painfully
on the knuckles. Bouteflika ... made it
very clear that the writing off of debts
is not a guarantee of most-favored
status for Russian companies. Neither
Gazprom, nor Lukoil, nor
Soyuzneftgaz, nor Itera came away
from Algeria with signed memorandums
of cooperation with the Algerian
oil and gas company Sonatrach. The
Russian defense industry ended up
the sole winner. (38)
Even in the arms field, however, Russian-Algerian relations do not
appear to be completely harmonious. In July 2006, Russia's AVN (Military News Agency) reported that Russia was "falling behind
schedule in supplying Sukhoi aircraft to Algeria" under the 2001
agreement. (39) Although talks began in early 2007 for Algiers to buy an
additional $7 billion in weapons from Moscow, another Russian press
agency (RIA Novosti) reported that problems had emerged regarding the
2006 arms agreements: deliveries of the T-90S tanks had been delayed,
deliveries of Pantsir S1 short-range anti-aircraft systems would
probably also be, and talks "on the construction of frigates for
Algeria have come to a deadlock." (40)
Yet another irritant to their relations appeared to arise when an
Algerian newspaper reported in October 2006 that the Russian oil company
Rosneft "plans to pump Algerian oil and refine it afterward in
Israel" if it succeeded in gaining control of a refinery there.
(41) "It is worth noting," the author stiffly pointed out,
"that Algeria is not responsible for crude-oil shares belonging to
its partners and contractors." (42) Once again, a major Russian
firm with close Kremlin ties was clearly not going to let concern for
Algerian sensibilities stand in the way of an opportunity for it to
profit.
European concerns that Russia and Algeria might collaborate to
raise natural-gas prices are understandable but appear to be overblown.
In order to raise European natural-gas prices, either Russia or Algeria,
or both, would have to be willing and able to cut back on natural-gas
production, as Saudi Arabia does in the oil market. So far, though,
neither seems willing to do so. If anything, Gazprom hopes that its
cooperation with Sonatrach will help increase Russian LNG production.
Further, not only are other producers waiting in the wings to sell LNG
to Europe, but Gazprom seems eager to help turn Libya into a major gas
exporter to Europe. Finally, it is clear that Russian-Algerian relations
are prickly. While the two are not enemies, they are not friends either.
Russia and Algeria cooperate on some matters, but since neither
hesitates to pursue its own economic and commercial interests even when
this negatively affects the other's, it is doubtful that the
Russian-Algerian relationship will amount to the "strategic
partnership" that they claimed to establish in 2001.
(1) "Russia, Algeria to Discuss Military Cooperation,
Debt," ITAR-TASS in English, March 10, 2006.
(2) Gennady Charodeyev, "Time to Count How Much Our Former
Ally Owes Us," Izvestia, April 6, 2001, p. 8 (English translation
in Current Digest of the Post-Soviet Press [hereinafter referred to as
CDPSP], May 2, 2001, p. 23).
(3) Ibid.
(4) V. Titorenko, "Russia Comes Back to Algeria,"
International Affairs (Moscow), Vol. 52, No. 4 (2006), p. 163.
(5) Charodeyev, "Time to Count How Much Our Former Ally Owes
Us."
(6) Vladimir Katin, "Mediterranean Sea Is NATO Interest
Zone," Nezavisimaya gazeta, March 29, 2000, p. 6 (CDPSP, April 26,
2000, pp. 18-19).
(7) Titorenko, "Russia Comes Back to Algeria," pp. 163-4.
(8) Aleksandr Reutov, "Russia Gets a New Strategic
Partner," Kommersant, April 5, 2001, p. 10 (CDPSP, May 2, 2001), p.
23.
(9) Ibid.
(10) "Russia Falling behind Schedule of Supplying Sukhoi
Aircraft to Algeria," Agentstvo Voyennykh Novostey (AVN), July 28,
2006 (FBIS).
(11) Titorenko, "Russia Comes Back to Algeria," p. 164.
(12) Ibid., p. 165.
(13) Yelena Suponina, "Putin Forgives Algeria
Everything," Vremya novostei, March 13, 2006, p. 5 (CDPSP, April
12, 2006, pp. 18-19).
(14) Ibid.
(15) Rossiyskaya gazeta, March 11, 2006, p. 2.
(16) Moscow NTV Mir in Russian, March 10, 2006.
(17) Natalya Mikhailovna Melikova, "Spisaf dolgi
po-russki," Nezavisimaya gazeta, March 13, 2006, interact edition.
(18) "Russia's Gazprom, Algeria's Sonatrach Sign MoU
on Cooperation," Interfax in English, August 4, 2006.
(19) Radio Algiers Channel 1, August 5, 2006.
(20) "Where Europe Gets Its Gas From," BBC News/Europe,
January 4, 2006 (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/ europe/4578350.stm).
(21) Ibid.; "N. Africa to Supply Half Europe Gas Imports by
2010," Reuters, November 8, 2004; and Sarah Laitner and Ian
Limbach, "Italians Fume over 'Threat to Gas Price,'"
Financial Times, August 9, 2006, p. 4.
(22) "Gazprom renforee la pression sur l'Europe," La
Tribune (Pads), August 8, 2006, Internet edition; and "An Emerging
Gas Cartel?" RFE/RL Belarus and Ukraine Report, August 15, 2006.
(23) Igor Torbakov, "Moscow Maneuvers to Force Europe to
Accept Its Terms of Energy Cooperation," Jamestown Foundation
Eurasia Daily Monitor, August 11, 2006.
(24) Carl Mortished, "Putin's Goal on Energy 'May Be
More Tension,'" Financial Times, May 23, 2006 (Internet
version).
(25) "Arrogante Russie," Le Monde, June 29, 2006
(Internet version).
(26) Laura Serafini, "Interview with Massimo Orlando, CEO of
Sorgenia," Il Sole 24 Ore, August 12, 2006 (Lexis-Nexis).
(27) "Mutual Suspicions," Africa Energy Intelligence,
August 23, 2006 (Factiva).
(28) "Gazprom Booed-and Wooed As It Seeks Global Reach,"
World Gas Intelligence, August 23, 2006 (Factiva).
(29) "GECF: No Threat of 'Gas OPEC,'"
Datamonitor, October 6, 2006 (Lexis-Nexis).
(30) David Buchan, "A New Nervousness," Financial Times
(FT Report-Energy), October 20, 2006, p. 4.
(31) "Khelil: 'Il risque d'avoir une impact negative
sur l'Algerie,'" Liberte (Algiers), January 7, 2006,
Internet edition.
(32) Radio Algiers Channel 1, January 8, 2006.
(33) "Khelil: Il risque ..." Liberte, January 7, 2006.
(34) Il Sole 24 Ore, February 14, 2006, Internet edition.
(35) Ibid.
(36) Rossiyskaya gazeta, March 11, 2006, p. 2. See also Rossiya TV,
March 10, 2006.
(37) "Gazprom, Libya to Sign Memorandum of Cooperation in Gas
Projects," ITAR-TASS in English, June 28, 2006.
(38) Melikova, "Spisat' dolgi po-russki."
(39) "Russia Falling Behind Schedule of Supplying Sukhoi
Aircraft to Algeria."
(40) "Algeria Could Become Russia's Main Military
Partner," RIA Novosti, March 29, 2007. A more recent report,
though, indicated that an $800-900 million deal for Algeria to buy two
frigates from Russia may be reached: F. Lamia, "New Armament Deal
between Algeria and Russia, El Khabar, October 16, 2007 (Interact
edition).
(41) Echourouk El Youmi (Algiers), October 16, 2006, Internet
edition.
(42) Ibid.
Dr. Katz is professor of government and politics at George Mason
University.