Arctic freezer plant.
Pesch, Michael J. ; Ahmad, Sohel ; Nebosis, Timothy 等
CASE DESCRIPTION
The primary subject matter of this case concerns managing diversity
issues in the workplace and the application of total quality management
principles. Specifically, an appliance manufacturer is experiencing
challenges involving Somali refugees who comprise a significant
percentage of the plant's available labor pool. These challenges
include quality and productivity problems caused by the Somali
workers' lack of English skills and adherence to cultural and
religious customs, as well as by the plant's own poor preparation
to manage this group of employees. The case has a difficulty level of
three or four, appropriate for junior or senior level students. The case
is designed to be taught in a ninety minute class period, with two hours
of outside preparation time by students.
CASE SYNOPSIS
Imagine the challenge of being a manufacturing plant manager of a
major employer in the community, faced with the need to satisfy rigorous
customer requirements in the areas of quality, price, and delivery. You
must fulfill these requirements with a local labor pool that has a
limited supply of applicants and recently has become populated by
refugee immigrants who speak little or no English. Additionally, these
refugee employees have cultural and religious customs that pose
challenges in the areas of plant safety and productivity.
As a leading employer in the business community, you know the
spotlight will be on your company to help come up with ways to address
the community challenge of helping a new immigrant population become
productive members of the community. The last thing your company needs
is bad publicity in the area of relationships with workers from diverse
ethnic backgrounds. Yet you know that your plant must compete on a
global basis and your giant retail customers will spare no time in
seeking other suppliers if you cannot meet their requirements.
INTRODUCTION
It was 7:30 am on a Friday in late September, when Susan Michaels,
a senior manufacturing engineer at the Arctic Freezer plant in Xenia,
Minnesota, knocked on plant manager Jim Gromberg's door.
"Excuse me, Jim, but we're at the 3-week mark since we
launched the third shift on the upright line, and it's been pretty
much of a quality and output disaster, with not much hope in sight for
improvement. Despite everything we've tried, there are so many
problems with these new Somali workers that we're almost out of
ideas. I'm not sure how much longer we can go on before it starts
hurting our quality and delivery reputation."
Jim was afraid of this. The third shift on the large up-right
freezer line had been added in early September to address a growing
backlog of orders from major customers such as Best Buy and Sears. The
demand for freezers tends to be counter-cyclical to the national economy
and this was proving to be true once again; retail demand for freezers
was up 20 percent in the past year, as consumers began shopping for
bargains and stocking up on meat and other frozen food items. However,
the third shift was not meeting productivity expectations and certain
issues that related to the 90 Somali workers (out of 120) on the third
shift were proving to be more challenging than first expected. The
moment had come for Jim to assess the situation and make a decision.
COMPANY AND PLANT BACKGROUND
Arctic Home Products was a subsidiary of WH Alliance, a Norwegian
appliance manufacturer. The Arctic plant in Xenia, Minnesota,
manufactured approximately 2 million chest and upright freezers per
year, about 60 percent of the total annual number of freezers that were
sold in North America. The plant employed 1,600-1,700 International
Association of Machinists Union employees who worked on the chest and
upright freezer assembly lines. The plant operated 2-3 production shifts
per day. As is typical of assembly line work in general, the work
involves repetitive tasks completed on high unit volumes. Due to high
variations in demand, the workforce is subject to frequent layoffs and
rehirings, resulting in extremely high turnover of employees. An
assembler was typically paid $10.54-$10.79 per hour. No prior work
experience is required, but a high school diploma or a general
equivalency diploma is necessary to be hired.
Background on Somali Immigrants in Minnesota
Since the late 1980s, civil war and famine have caused over
1,000,000 Somalis to flee to neighboring countries like Kenya, Ethiopia,
and Yemen. In addition, the United States, Britain, Canada, and Sweden
have provided refugee status to tens of thousands of Somalis. By the
year 2002, Minnesota had approximately 50,000 Somali immigrants, the
highest Somali density outside of East Africa.
Refugee status generally brings a host of special adaptation
challenges that are not generally featured in non-refugee immigrant
groups. Among these challenges are higher rates of illiteracy, lack of
English skills, significantly lower economic resources, and often a
stronger adherence to refugees because these people have been suddenly
uprooted from their traditional way of life and, by necessity, must seek
out a new approach to providing for themselves and their families.
Somalis are only the most recent immigrant group to arrive in
Minnesota, joining previous groups of immigrants who have settled in the
state over the past twenty-five years, arriving from Mexico, the former
Soviet republics, Southeast Asia, China, and India. There are several
reasons for the general increase in immigrant populations over this time
period, especially in Minnesota. First, a change in immigration law in
1997 allowed family members of refugee immigrants from several African
countries to enter the U.S. under the family preference provisions of
the law, instead of the refugee provisions that impose a high standard
of proof of the likelihood of persecution in their home country. Somalia
was one of the countries included in this change in immigration law.
Second, Minnesota is well-known for a strong economy that features
many low-wage jobs in food processing, meat and poultry packing,
agriculture, and the hospitality industry. The state also provides
exceptional social services from both public and private/religious
agencies, generous welfare programs, excellent schools, and high levels
of medical care.
A third factor is the cultural and social support structures for
particular groups of immigrants that are created when a critical
population level is reached to attract additional members of immigrant
groups who may have initially settled in other parts of the U.S. Even
Minnesota's climate has played a role in the increase of
immigrants, with some Russians moving to Minnesota because they prefer
Minnesota's climate to the warmer regions of the U.S. It is
considered likely that the current factors that have promoted the
immigration of foreign-born people to Minnesota will continue to build
this segment of the state's population.
THE NEED FOR A THIRD SHIFT
There were three main reasons why a third shift was needed on
Arctic's upright line. First, a plant workers' strike had
drawn down inventory to minimum levels. Second, major customers such as
Sears conducted model changes in the spring of the year and inventories
of the old model numbers had been allowed to gradually phase out. Third,
the mild economic recession had boosted consumer freezer sales by about
20 percent, as mentioned previously.
Hiring the Third Shift
Despite the increase in national unemployment statistics, workers
continued to be scarce in central Minnesota. Arctic competed
aggressively with other area employers of low skill workers such as Gold
'N Plump (a poultry processor), and Fingerhut (a catalog sales
company).
In mid-August, Jim began hiring the 120 line workers for a third
shift on the upright freezer line. The Minnesota Workforce Center, a
state employment agency, referred a large number of newly-arrived Somali
immigrant refugees to Arctic for employment interviews. Each applicant
filled out a personal data form and was interviewed for about twenty
minutes to determine the applicant's education level and work
history. Since most Somalis spoke little English, some information was
difficult to obtain, although a handful of Somalis who spoke some
English were used as interpreters during the interviews. When the hiring
was completed in early September, 90 of the 120 workers were Somali.
Training the Third Shift
The training of the new workers consisted of the following: 1)
Early in the week before the official launching of the third shift, the
new hires were brought to the plant and divided into groups of 10-12,
shown a 2-hour video on general plant and safety rules, and given a
plant tour. 2) In the afternoon of the first day, the workers were
paired with experienced line workers to learn how to perform assembly
line duties. 3) This "shadowing" by new hires of regular line
workers continued for 1-4 days, with fewer days for workers who were
hired just a few days prior to the start-up of the third shift.
Performance of the Third Shift
When the third shift was started the following week, quality and
productivity problems were numerous. Output of finished freezers was
only about 50% of standard for the third shift. Work in process and
finished goods inspection revealed numerous problems, from missing parts
and poor workmanship to scratched paint. These problems were expensive
and time-consuming to correct. Direct labor costs per unit soared for
the units produced by the third shift.
Jim Gromberg and his staff recognized that the third shift was
going to need more assistance in getting the line up to speed than could
be provided by the standard number of two supervisors and one area
manager per line. He asked for volunteers from the management and
engineer ranks to work for two weeks on the line alongside the workers.
Six people volunteered (one quality manager, three manufacturing
engineers, one maintenance engineer, and a production supervisor from
another part of the plant). These individuals supervised operations in
critical areas of the line, such as door assembly, refrigerant fluid
injection, and rework operations. However, this stopgap measure to boost
line performance could not last beyond two weeks, since the volunteers
could not be expected to work the 11:00pm-7:00am shift indefinitely.
Moreover, performance of the third shift line was not improving as
rapidly as needed, despite all the special attention the line was given.
Performance in schedule attainment, units produced per labor-hour, and
quality continued to languish. This lack of performance was one of the
contributing factors in the recent loss of a 2,500-unit order from one
of the plant's long-term customers.
Factors Related to Poor Third Shift Performance
Although all new shifts suffered initial inefficiencies and quality
problems, these problems were usually resolved within a few days, as
supervisors work with the new line workers to fine-tune their skills.
However, in the case of the Somali employees, the language barrier
proved to be a significant challenge in teaching workers correct work
methods. First, at the startup time of the third shift, none of the
technical instructions for executing line procedures had been translated
into the Somali language. Second, a great deal of manufacturing process
knowledge was in the heads of the experienced workers on the first and
second shifts. Although the newly-hired Somali workers spent time
shadowing the experienced workers, it was usually difficult for the
experienced workers to explain proper procedures to the Somali workers.
Third, although some Somali workers could speak some English, their
level of fluency usually fell short of that which was necessary to
translate technical instructions with sufficient accuracy so the
non-English speaking workers could understand and follow them properly.
Consequently, the learning curve for the Somali workers was much longer
than for newly-hired workers of local origin.
Safety was another issue that proved more challenging in
supervising the Somali workers. The printed safety information in the
plant was in English and obtaining accurate printed Somali translations
was proving to be difficult. There were more than 500 sets of posted
instructions in the plant that would have to be translated. The
plant's leadership was trying to determine how best to provide
accurate translations of signage and documentation. However, as the days
elapsed, management became aware that many of the Somalis were probably
illiterate. For these illiterate workers, a significant safety concern
would remain even after signs and manuals had been translated.
Another safety issue that was particular to Somali workers was
loose clothing, particularly the traditional clothing that was worn by
Somali female workers, which often consisted of long billowing dresses,
yards of cloth draped over the shoulder and tied at the waist, and
headscarves. These garments posed a significant risk of becoming
entangled in the manufacturing equipment and endangering the workers.
Plant management was able to convince workers to alter their clothing by
either wearing clothing that is more typical of American workers, or by
fastening the native Somali clothing more closely to their bodies.
However, these changes in dress behavior happened slowly and required
managers to remind some workers several times to adjust or change their
work clothing.
A significant cultural issue with the Somali workers involved
Muslim prayer customs that require Muslims to pray five times per day at
specific times. These prayer times often did not coincide with regular
work breaks. For reasons of line pacing and productivity, the workers
could not take their breaks at the exact prayer times. Consequently,
some workers would request permission to use the toilet, but instead
would go to the restrooms to pray. Additionally, washing before prayer
is another part of Muslim religious observance and some workers would
excuse themselves to visit the restroom and sometimes leave large
amounts of water on the restroom floor, creating a safety hazard.
Another cultural issue that sometimes affected productivity and
quality performance was the reluctance by Somali men to take direction
from female supervisors. Although some progress was made to convince the
men to follow instructions from female supervisors, this too was slow in
taking hold, partly because it was difficult to determine whether it was
the language barrier or the gender barrier that explained the lack of
responsiveness to female supervisor requests.
Nonverbal Communication Barriers
Other challenges involved differences in the meaning of gestures
and body language. For example, a thumbs-up gesture is considered
obscene to Somalis. It is also impolite to point the sole of one's
foot at another person, a common occurrence when someone sits in a chair
across from someone else. To Somalis, using one's index finger to
call someone over is used for calling only dogs.
JIM GROMBERG'S DILEMMA
Jim knew he had to face the fact that the productivity and quality
problems on the third shift upright freezer line weren't getting
better as quickly as they needed to. In the current business environment
of "lean manufacturing" and "just-in-time" supplier
relationships, the Arctic plant operated within tight profit, quality,
and delivery parameters. Many of the plant's customers didn't
keep warehouses of finished goods inventory as a buffer against delivery
delays. Therefore, orders placed by these customers necessarily had high
delivery priority. Of course, quality problems also had a big impact on
delivery time performance and were expensive to correct.
Jim also was well-aware that the problems on the third shift
upright line necessarily affected overall plant delivery performance.
This was due to the fact that several major customers regularly placed
orders for a mix of different freezer models. As often as possible, the
plant would load all the models in a single order together in one
semi-trailer for shipment to the customer's store. For these mixed
model orders, a delay in the production of a single model could hold up
the delivery of all the other models to the customer.
Jim wondered, "How long could the plant afford to absorb the
effects of the third shift's suboptimal performance?" He
picked up a report that had just arrived from the information systems
department. First, he looked at the productivity chart (Figure 1). The
chart showed the productivity figures for all shifts for the five weeks
prior to the start of the third shift (Weeks 1-5), as well as for the
three weeks following the launch of the third shift (Weeks 6-8). Jim
could see that aggregated productivity for Weeks 6, 7, and 8 was
hovering around 4.3 units per labor-hour, about 20% lower than the
historical average for the line. This was disturbing to Jim, especially
since only the basic no-options version of the upright freezer line was
scheduled for the third shift, while first and second shifts produced
the more complex versions of the upright line. The third shift had a
long way to go to meet the productivity standards that the first and
second shifts were achieving.
Jim recalled that Eileen Engdahl from the shipping department
wanted to know if something could be done in manufacturing to reduce
late deliveries. Jim pulled out the late delivery chart (Figure 2) he
received from the shipping department. Again, late deliveries appeared
to be a problem that could be traced to the introduction of the third
shift at the beginning of Week 6. Although delivery performance had
improved slightly over the past three weeks, about 20% of the deliveries
still did not meet the promised delivery time. "It won't take
long before we lose some long-time customers if we do not dramatically
improve delivery performance," Jim thought. Arctic's customers
were used to getting on-time delivery. Data from the five weeks previous
to the introduction of the third shift attested to this fact. Jim
noticed that only Week 2 had about 2% late deliveries; all other weeks
prior to the start of the third shift in Week 6 showed 100% on-time
deliveries.
"What can be done from a manufacturing standpoint to help the
shipping department?" Jim wondered. The data on schedule attainment
may provide some clues, he thought. However, the schedule attainment
chart (Figure 3) delivered more bad news. The newly introduced third
shift consistently lagged the other two shifts on the upright freezer
line. Moreover, there was no sign of improvement. From past experience,
Jim knew that failure to attain schedule had a cumulative effect on late
delivery due to the mixed-model shipping requirements of the
plant's customers. "This is not good," Jim murmured to
himself.
Jim knew his plant was inexperienced in dealing with large numbers
of non-English speaking immigrant workers. Out of all the managers and
supervisors, only two were fluent in a second language and in both cases
the language was Spanish. Also, diversity training for the plant's
staff consisted of two videos, one on how to accommodate individuals
with physical disabilities, and another that superficially discussed the
advantages of workplace diversity.
As he reflected on the disappointing performance of the third
shift, Jim realized that the training approach taken for the Somali
workers had inadequately prepared them to perform to plant standards
within the expected length of time. Jim also wondered if the plant could
afford to address all the special needs required of workers like the
Somalis. On the other hand, the shortage of low-skilled employees in the
region made him consider that perhaps management had little choice but
to learn and adapt to the needs of the available labor pool. Despite all
of the unique issues that were associated with the new Somali workers,
Jim knew that none of these issues necessarily meant that the Somali
workers could not become just as productive as the other workers in the
plant. (Jim recalled that his friend, Brent Haws, Human Resources Director at Gold 'N Plump, commented to him that the Somali workers
in his company's poultry processing plants were among the
"best workers" in terms of low absenteeism, low turnover, and
high productivity.) Jim also knew that as a major employer in Xenia,
Arctic would be in the community spotlight in discussions of how best to
assist the Somali people in becoming integrated into the Xenia
community. Jim thought to himself, "Should I discontinue the third
shift to stem productivity losses? Or is there something else I can do
to more effectively achieve Arctic's strategic goals?"
[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 3 OMITTED]
Michael J. Pesch, St. Cloud State University
Sohel Ahmad, St. Cloud State University
Timothy Nebosis, St. Cloud State University