Kmart-Sears merger of 2005.
Rahman, Noushi ; Eisner, Alan B.
"Unless this new retail giant proves that it's capable of
creating stronger customer connections, there will be no real value to
this merger" (William J. McEwen, Gallup Management Journal)
"As a retailer, we really have not grown at all for the last
35 years" (Alan Lacy, Vice Chairman of SHC, Ex-Chairman of Sears)
"The idea is to form "one great culture" (Edward Lampert,
Chairman of SHC, Ex- Chairman or Kmart)
CASE DESCRIPTION
The primary subject matter of this case is corporate strategy. The
subject matter is fleshed out in the context of a merger. This case is
intended for an undergraduate or graduate corporate strategy section of
a business strategy course. The case is designed to be taught in one
class hour and is expected to require one hour of outside preparation by
students.
CASE SYNOPSIS
In November 2004, retail giants Kmart and Sears announced plans to
"merge" their operations. The "merger" was finalized in March 2005 and the combined entity was named Sears Holding Company.
At the completion of the "merger," Sears Holding Company had
revenues of more than $55 billion (in addition to $2.8 billion in debt),
making it the third largest domestic retail company following Wal-Mart
and Home Depot. The new organization would face three important issues:
competition, synergy, and culture. Appropriate strategies, structures,
and culture-blending initiatives must be developed to integrate these
historic, disparate organizations to successfully perform as one unified
business firm.
THE MERGER
In late 2004, two giant U.S. retail corporations--Sears, Roebuck
and Co. and Kmart Holding Corporation--announced that they would merge
operations to form the Sears Holding Company (SHC). In terms of how the
new entity's name was selected, the Sears name was apparently held
in higher esteem by consumers than the Kmart name. Based on a survey
conducted by Rivkin & Associates, Opinion Research Corp. (of 1,050
U.S. adults), 75% of Americans preferred the "Sears" name over
"Kmart."
Under the terms of the merger, SHC became the third largest
retailer in the U.S. with approximately $55 billion in annual revenues
and 2,350 full-line and off-mall stores and 1,100 specialty retail
stores in the U.S. Kmart shareholders received one share of SHC common
stock for each Kmart share. Sears shareholders had the right to elect
$50 in cash or 0.5 of a share of SHC for each share of Sears's
common stock. At the time of the merger, it was estimated that the
former shareholders of Kmart would have an approximate 63% interest in
SHC and former shareholders of Sears would hold a 37% interest in SHC.
On the morning of March 24, 2005, the merger approval date, Sears shares
fell $6.06 (about 11%) to $50.74 (NYSE) and Kmart shares rose $1.19
(about 1%) to $126.02 (NASDAQ).
Twelve teams--comprised of members from both companies--were
created to ease the merger process. According to Alan Lacy, former
President and Chief Executive Officer of Sears and new Vice Chairman of
SHC, one post-merger goal is that "Kmart will benefit from the
planned cost sharing of several of Sears leading proprietary
brands" as well as present opportunities "to capture
significant revenue and cost synergies, including merchandise and
non-merchandise purchasing, distribution and other SG&A
expenses." Ultimately, the goal of the merger, according to Edward
S. Lampert, former Chairman of Kmart and new Chairman of SHC, was to
"seek to leverage the combined strengths of Sears and Kmart to
obtain greater long-term value than either could have generated on a
stand-alone basis. SHC plans to offer customers a new, more compelling
experience with a differentiated and expanded product range" (SHC
Press Release, 2005).
These changes are the first of many for these historic and somewhat
disparate companies, both of which were founded in the late 1800's
and are woven in American culture. The newly merged entity--SHC--will
face challenges of marrying two distinct retail entities in terms of
their unique cultures, in order to create requisite synergies to keep
pace with (or surpass) the competition. Before looking on to the future,
it is important to look at the historical evolution of Sears and Kmart
to better understand the respective organizations' strategies and
cultures.
BACKGROUND OF COMPANIES
Sears, Roebuck & Co.
Richard W. Sears found the R.W. Sears Watch Co. in 1886. The early
days of the organization were filled with changes in structure and
partnership--moving to Chicago, taking on Alvah Roebuck (an Indiana
watchmaker) as a partner, and publishing the company's first mail
order catalog (which comprised of 80 pages) in 1888. The watch business
was sold in 1889 and by 1891 Sears had developed the nation's first
mail-order business. In 1893, the company's name changed to Sears,
Roebuck and Co. At that time, the company's sales had exceeded
$400,000. By 1895, the 532-page Sears catalog offered a variety of
merchandise, including apparel, shoes, china, saddles, musical
instruments, firearms, buggies, wagons, fishing tackle, watches,
jewelry, etc.
In 1911, when banks did not lend to consumers, Sears opted to offer
credit services to its customers. Around this time, Sears also
established a research lab to ensure product standards and conduct
merchandise quality control checks. In February 1925, Sears opened its
first retail store. In terms of retail history making, Richard Sears is
credited with creating the modern department store; he also came up with
the idea of "unconditional money back guarantee."
Like most other U.S. companies, Sears struggled during the great
depression. After the depression, the company continued its growth in
terms of number of retail locations, business line diversification
(e.g., Sears introduced a line of tires, "Allstate," which was
ultimately expanded into an automobile insurance and life insurance
company), international expansion (e.g., early expansions included Cuba
in 1942 and Mexico in 1947), acquisitions of several other organizations
(e.g., Simpsons Ltd. of Canada, Coldwell Banker Co., etc.), and the
erection of the Sears Tower in Chicago in the 1970's (i.e., at the
time, the tallest building in the world). By 1963, Sears was the
number-one retailer in the U.S. and one-in-five consumers shopped at
Sears regularly.
Early success ultimately made Sears complacent. By the 1970's,
competition became stiff and other discounters (S. S. Kresge Co., which
later became Kmart) started cutting into Sears' profits. In 1974
alone, Sears experienced a $170 million drop in profits. In an effort to
continue its growth, Sears attempted to further diversify its
businesses. Despite diversification in the 1980's (e.g., purchase
of Coldwell Banker, then the nation's largest real estate broker;
Dean Witter Reynolds, a securities firm; the launch of Prodigy, an
on-line service with IBM and CBS; the launch of the Discover Card; and
ultimately the transformation of Sears into a collection of specialty
stores), profits continued to decline through the 1990's. In 1992,
Sears slashed jobs and suffered a year-end loss of almost $2.3 billion.
This outcome prompted Sears to sell off several of its businesses (e.g.,
Coldwell Banker, Dean Witter Reynolds, etc.).
As a strategic response to declining revenue in the 1990's,
Sears made an effort to target female consumers, introducing the
"softer side of Sears." To support this strategy, Sears
restructured its stores (i.e., moving appliances, hardware, and
furniture were moved from mall stores to their own freestanding retail
outlets). By 1995, profits hit $1 billion again; and in 1997, Sears
stock reached an all time high of $65.25 per share. By 1998, however,
Sears again saw downturns in business and many executives, including the
chief executive officer, departed. In October 2000, current President
Alan Lacy took the reins and created "The Great Indoors" store
concept. Another strategic move made by Lacy was to transfer Sears
account holders to MasterCard as Sears had come to rely too heavily on
its credit card financing operations. This move resulted in many
consumer defaults because of the higher interest rates. Sears in-store
sales also continued to falter. In 2003 sales were slumping and staff
layoffs were instituted again. In addition, the credit card business was
sold for $3 billion to Citigroup. The "softer side of Sears"
was ultimately considered to be too "soft" as witnessed by the
eleven consecutive months of declining sales seen in 2004 (see Exhibits
1 and 2 for Sears' revenues and net income).
[GRAPHICS OMITTED]
In general, Sears' retail business had been weak, consistent
with its declining store sales. Sears' in-mall locations had been a
major impediment to its sales of home-related categories because the
majority of home goods are sold in off-mall locations. Indeed, Sears was
able to retain some of its charisma in small-town America (i.e., where
its off-mall stores were located).
Kmart Holding Corporation
Kmart was founded as S. S. Kresge Co. in 1899 by Sebastian Spering
Kresge as a five-and-dime retail store in Downtown Detroit. He then
expanded into chain stores, similar to that of the Woolworth stores and
ultimately acquired Mount Clemens Pottery (which manufactured
inexpensive, popular dinnerware sold in the stores). By 1912, Kresge
stores were the second largest five-and-dime chain in the U.S. with 85
stores and annual sales of over $10 million. By 1924, there were 257
stores with annual sales of $90 million.
Similar to Sears, Kresge stores struggled through the Great
Depression. Unlike Sears, Kresge stores did not offer "credit"
to its customers in the early years. Although Kresge offered layaway payment plans, this approach hurt the company because customers were
more attracted to credit offerings.
In the late 1950's, food grew into the single largest
department in Kresge stores and in-store luncheonettes were created.
Consequently, Kresge acquired various food companies (e.g., Furr's
Cafeterias, Bishop Buffets, etc.), created a fast food drive-through
(i.e., Kmart Chef), and ultimately entered grocery retailing in
1970's. Kmart Chef was discontinued in 1974.
In 1962, Kresge's President Harry Cunningham conducted a
research study on discounters and competition. Cunningham found that
discount stores were the main competition for Kresge stores. As a
strategic response, "Kmart" was born in Garden City, Michigan.
After the first year in business with Kmart, sales reached $483
million and plans were made to open 32 additional Kmart locations which
were geographically isolated from the competition. Through the
1960's, Kmart and Kresge continued to evolve and older Kresge
stores were converted to Jupiter Discount. By 1976, Kmart became the
second largest general merchandise retailer in the U.S. with annual
sales of $8.4 billion. The corporation held its shares tightly (1,206
out of 1,647) and maintained 271 stores. The S.S. Kresge name was
officially changed to Kmart Corp. in 1977. In mid 1970's, Kmart
expanded internationally into Australia. However, Kmart sold its stake
in the Australian Kmart in 1978. In the 1980's, Kmart expanded to
Mexico (stores operated by a prominent Mexican retailer); the company
also formed a joint venture with Japan's top retailer.
By 1981, Kmart had 2,000 stores and continued expanding through
acquisitions of Penske Auto, Walden Books, and Home Centers America
(renamed Builders Square). By 1987, sales were up to $25.6 billion. In
order to continue its growth, from 1980 through the 1990's, Kmart
Corp. acquired Sports Authority, OfficeMax, and Borders Inc.; merged
with Pay Less Drug Stores, launched the Jaclyn Smith Collection, and
opened Super Kmart Centers (1,200 sites by 1997). During this time,
Kmart also enjoyed the growth of its apparel business (i.e.,
Kmart's fastest growing business).
In 1994, Kmart streamlined operations in response to shareholder
displeasure. The company closed 110 stores, laying off 6,000 staff
members and managers. Furthermore, Kmart sold off several of its
previously acquired businesses: OfficeMax, Borders/Walden bookstores,
Payless Drugs, Penske Auto, and Sports Authority.
Facing tremendous competition from other major retailers (mainly
Walmart and Target), Kmart continued to change throughout the
1990's by selling its stake in the Rite Aid Corp., partnering with
Salton/Maxim Housewares (i.e., giving Kmart exclusive distribution
rights Salton/Maxim's small electrical appliances, consumer
electronics, kitchen housewares and personal care products and other
White Westinghouse brands), introducing the highly successful Martha
Stewart line (i.e., home fashion products that neared $1 billion in
sales), creating BlueLight.com (i.e., an independent e-commerce company
formed in 1999), and entering the food retailing segment. However, all
these shuffling proved futile, as Kmart continued to lose market share
(see Exhibits 1 and 2 for Kmart's revenues and net income). Kmart
Corp. filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in January, 2002.
Edward Lampert, former Chairman of Kmart, turned around Kmart from
bankruptcy in less than two years. By the end of 2004, Kmart reported
three consecutive profitable quarters and operated 1,511 Kmart discount
stores and SuperCenters. Such expedited recovery sent Kmart's stock
price above $100 per share in late 2004. Despite the turnaround
orchestrated by Lampert, Kmart's market share continued to shrink.
Some criticized that Lampert pumped Kmart to generate cash rather than
to build the business (Garbato, 2005).
THE NEW ENTITY: SEARS HOLDINGS CORPORATION
As indicated in the comparison chart (see Exhibit 3), there is
common territory among the products offered by the Sears and Kmart
stores--the primary overlaps being in the home goods and apparel arenas.
Some major differences in product offerings exist too. On one hand,
Sears sells lawn, garden, tools, large appliances, automotive, hardware
and window/siding products, which are not offered by Kmart. On the other
hand, Kmart's retail food line and pharmacy operations are not
common to Sears. Differences in product lines need to be exploited by
SHC, as the new entity "will feature a powerful home appliance
franchise with strong positions in tools, lawn and garden, home
electronics and auto repair and maintenance." The new company
expects that these product lines, in addition to the combined strengths
of the apparel lines previously offered by both Sears and Kmart, the
strength of the Martha Stewart Home line and the predicted extra traffic
generated by the retail food line, will result in a realization of
approximately $200 million in incremental gross margin from revenue
synergies capitalized by these cross-selling opportunities and by the
conversion of off-mall Kmart stores to Sears. According to an SHC Press
Release, "The company expects to achieve annual costs savings of
$300 million principally through improved merchandising and
non-merchandising purchasing scale as well as improved supply chain,
administrative and other operational efficiencies" (SHC Press
Release, 2004).
Lampert believes that the anticipated $200 million in additional
revenue, the $300 million in cost savings, and Kmart's $3.8 billion
in tax credits (which will shield profits for a number of years) would
help SHC's per share price to rise. As a result, SHC should be able
to accumulate cash and be in a strong market position. His vision for
SHC is to build a broader customer base and to increase sales to achieve
profits of 10% EBITDA-to-sales ratio (similar to successful retailers
like The Gap and Home Depot). This will be accomplished by several
strategies.
First, SHC will convert Kmart stores to the Sears name in
"markets where existing Kmart stores better fit Sears'
demographic of slightly higher-income shoppers. Second, given its huge
real estate portfolio, SHC will benefit from the flexibility of
switching stores between chains and selling stores as necessary
(although this can be limited by mall owners, because 74% of mall owners
followed by Merrill Lynch have a Sears store).
Third, SHC will expand on the Sears Grand concept (off-mall stores
which carry consumables) to counter the "loss of consumers to
savvier rivals." Plans are already in place to open 60 Sears Grand
stores by 2006. Sears Grand expectations should benefit from
Kmart's experience in the consumables and apparel markets.
Consumables are viewed by the SHC as "traffic builders."
Fourth, SHC will expand the Sears Essentials stores (relatively smaller
convenience-driven stores) by converting approximately 400 existing
Kmart locations. Sears Essentials will offer products such as
appliances, lawn and garden tools, home electronics, apparel and home
fashions as well as convenience goods such as health and beauty aids, a
pharmacy, pantry items, household products, paper products, pet
supplies, and toys. These stores will benefit from Kmart's position
as one of the nation's largest pharmacy and health care retailers
(i.e., 1,150 in-store pharmacies, 2,400 staff pharmacists, and
significant expertise in disease management). The Kmart stores slated
for conversion are located in key urban and high-density suburban
markets with customer demographics and income levels matching those of
the typical Sears shopper. The first 25 Sears Essential stores will open
in Spring 2005.
Fifth, SHC will cross-sell products by having Kmart and Sears'
carry each other's lines. For example, Kmart will carry Kenmore
appliances, Craftsman tools, and diehard batteries; Sears will carry
some of Kmart's brands in future.
Lastly, SHC will be able to emphasize on apparel labels that appeal
to a multicultural audience. Latinos and African Americans make up a
significant share of Sears' shoppers and this group also represents
large share of the shoppers at Kmart's inner city locations.
Overall, management's strategy for the restructuring is aimed
at better supporting existing Sears stores, although both stores will
continue to operate separately under their respective names for quite
some time after the merger. The new structure creates eight regions that
cover 110 districts, each composed of six to nine stores. There will be
a new position entitled "director of stores" to manage each
district. This position will report to a regional vice president. Since
SHC will operate under at least six different formats, a challenge for
the new leadership will be to determine how the retail formats would fit
in each market and how they should be named, e.g., Sears Grand, Sears
Essentials, etc. Therefore, to avoid the inherent confusion that will
result among stakeholders (e.g., consumers, SHC employees, shareholders,
and analysts), it will be critical for the leadership of SHC to clearly
define the organization's identity, image, and direction. This is
even more important because, historically, both Sears and Kmart were
accused of having an ill-defined media image, caused by frequently
changing strategies. Both firms were also deficient in strategy
execution and employee training. Because of this, the new SHC executive
staff, in particular Aylwin Lewis--former President and CEO of Kmart, is
focused on team building and staff training (Berner & Weber, 2004;
Guy, 2005).
Equally important in terms of strategy is retaining and building
customer loyalty. A former Kmart executive, Gary Ruffing, who now serves
as senior director of retail consulting for BBK, Ltd, has advice for the
SHC management team: "You can fix a lot of things, but if you
can't get the customer back, it doesn't matter .... My advice
to the new CEO is to listen to the customer and keep the team focused on
four or five critical points of the shopping experience ... the keys are
the instock position, the touch points at checkout, the friendly service
and keeping the pricing within the value range." Ruffing also
underscored the importance of strategically placing Aylwin Lewis.
"[H]is ability to understand and bring brands and positions
together to drive the success of Sears Holding Co. and Kmart's
ability to fit outside of discounting ... where they fit has always been
an issue.... [E]ventual success could lie in the chains' combining
of product lines rather than that of the retail brands. Many people say
the retailers are two losers. The brand equity is not the Sears or Kmart
name ... brands are brands ... you have to understand who they are and
put together a marketing program and the ambient features that go with
that. You need somebody who has done that." Aylwin Lewis is
credited with the successful transformation of Kentucky Fried Chicken from a sleepy Southern brand touted by an aged colonel to the hip and
urban KFC (Clark, 2004).
In terms of changes for stakeholders as a result of the merger, one
glaring difference will be the loss of dividend payments to former Sears
shareholders. Another change, which will directly affect employees, is
the reduction by SHC of the number of employees eligible for stock
options (Sears had already reduced the number from 17,000 to 2,000 in
early 2004 and further reductions are expected) as well as the inherent
management changes and organizational policy changes. According to a
March 14, 2005 article in Home Textiles Today, "there will be
seismic shifts among senior executives and middle managers immediately
following the merger." Importantly, in April 2005 SHC announced the
first of a series of staff lay-offs (which will directly affect
employees and management at the Sears Chicago headquarters) as well as
salary and benefits changes to take effect in 2006.
Management
The new Board of Directors consists of seven directors from the
former Kmart Board and three directors from the former Sears Board. The
executive team is also a blend of former Kmart and Sears staff members,
as follows:
1. Edward S. Lampert, Chairman (formerly Chairman of Kmart)
2. Alan J. Lacy, Vice Chairman (formerly Chairman of Sears)
3. Aylwin B. Lewis, President of Sears Holdings and C.E.O. of Sears
Retail (formerly
President and C.E.O. of Kmart)
In addition, two other previous Sears executives and five Kmart
executives were appointed to SHC. Current and previous employment
positions of SHC's top management team is presented in Exhibit 4.
RETAIL INDUSTRY AND COMPETITION
Retail Industry
The retail industry is the second largest industry in the U.S. when
ranked by number of establishments (20% of all establishments) and
number of employees (18.3% of all employment covered by unemployment
insurance). The retail industry expanded at unprecedented rates from the
late 1990's to 2000, before the recession resulted in a
manufacturing slowdown, job losses, high consumer debt, and retail
bankruptcies. The industry was further plagued by the ".com
bust," uncertainty following the September 11, 2001 terrorist
attacks and global unrest. The rise of Wal-Mart and other big box
discount retailers (or "mass merchandisers") and the economic
recovery in the mid-2000's changed the retail landscape. Retailers
responded to these market pressures by restructuring stores,
reorganizing internal operations, and marketing patterns and by taking
advantage of technology to assist with e-commerce, inventory issues,
point-of-sale systems and data analysis. In 2004 (which is considered by
analysts to be the most "stable" retail year in quite some
time), the top ten U.S. general merchandise retailers based on 2004
sales figures were: (1) Wal-Mart ($285 billion), (2) Sears Holding Corp.
(recently merged with a combined $55 billion), (3) Target ($48 billion),
(4) Federated/May (recently merged with a combined $30 billion), (5)
J.C. Penney ($18 billion) (6) Gap Inc. ($16 billion), (7) TJX Cos. ($15
billion), (8) Limited Brands ($9 billion), (9) Dillard's ($8
billion) and (10) Saks ($6 billion). Home Depot, the number two retailer
in the U.S., is not considered a "department store." While
retail sales were strong in the luxury and discount sector in 2004,
department stores and other retailers struggled to make their numbers.
In early 2005, the GDP had risen 4.4% which was the fastest pace in five
years and was led by consumer and capital spending (Sway &
Musselman, 2005).
The architecture of the retail industry has drastically changed
from the introduction of catalogs and general trading stores, to
department stores, to the rise of indoor malls, to the growth of
discounters and big box stores, to internet based selling, to changing
demographics (more single parent households, double income households,
geographic shifts and increased catalog sales due to busy lifestyles).
In addition, catalogs and e-commerce have globalized the retail market.
Several other notable changes took place in the 2000's. For
example, as enclosed malls fall out of favor with consumers, new open
air "lifestyle centers" are becoming increasingly popular.
These centers have plenty of outdoor space--fountains, plazas, and
walking paths--designed to attract customers and keep them there for
longer periods of time. Because retailers generally pay less rent for
these open air arenas, profits are higher. In addition, consumers can
park very close to the store entrance, unlike traditional mall set-ups
(Kennedy, 2005).
More mega-mergers (such as the Sears/Kmart combination,
Federated/May stores) will result in the closing of more stores, which
in turn will propel even more mergers and acquisitions (in retail and
closely related industries). Because of this activity, suppliers may be
forced to merge in order to survive the huge bargaining clout created by
these mega-mergers. Suppliers potentially face fewer orders, higher
pressure for markdowns, discounts and promotions from the shrinkage wave
following these mergers. Ultimately, smaller suppliers will be swallowed
up by larger, healthier entities as they will be unable "to meet
the demands and prices of the newly emerging retail behemoths"
(Ostroff, 2005).
Another recent trend is that clothing vendors are opening their own
stores (e.g., Ralph Lauren, etc.), which has created somewhat of a
backlash on major retailers. In retaliation, chain operators like
Federated are opening series of mini stores (mini-Macys,
mini-Bloomingdales and other specialty mini stores such as Charter Club
and INC.) throughout the country to accommodate consumer's varied
tastes (Ostroff, 2005).
In the current retail economy, consumer trends lean toward value
and frugality, leading to a movement away from department stores and to
the rise of discount retailers, warehouse and wholesale clubs (such as
Costco and Sam's Club). Warehouse shopping outlets are currently
growing at a rate of 10% per year--twice as fast as the rest of the
retail industry. The long-term forecast for department stores in the
U.S. suggests a continued slow growth rate into the next century as the
industry continues to battle online retailing, direct marketing and home
shopping networks.
Competition
Wal-Mart was established in 1962 in Arkansas and is currently the
largest retailer in the U.S. and in the world. Wal-Mart is also
considered to be the low-price leader. The company went public in 1970
and has 4,800 stores worldwide with 75% of those located in the U.S.
Annual sales in the U.S. 2004 were $256.3 billion and their sales were
higher than the combined total of the nine second largest stores
(Target, Sears, Kmart, J.C. Penney, Federated, Mays, TJX, Kohl's
and Dillards). Wal-Mart is planning to open 500 new stores by the end of
2005 that will result in an 8% expansion of total square footage (55
million square feet). Wal-Mart has also entered the grocery market,
which has been strategic to its growth in recent years. In 2005,
Wal-Mart will add 240-250 Supercenters (stores which sell both general
merchandise and groceries), 30-40 Sam's Clubs (large warehouse
stores) and 25-30 Neighborhood Markets (smaller grocery store formats
designed to accommodate zoning in metropolitan areas).
Wal-Mart has significant power over its suppliers and has been
accused of unfair labor practices for years (they maintain a strict
anti-union position). It has a 44% turnover rate for their hourly
workforce and, in 2001, the average Wal-Mart employee earned below the
poverty level. Wal-Mart is also accused of putting many small town
department stores and individual establishments out of business and has
been criticized for limiting the public's choices by catering to
conservative special interest groups. Wal-Mart accounts for 2.3% of the
GNP. By comparison, General Motors was at 3% in 1955 and U.S. Steel was
at 2.8% in 1917 at their respective peaks. In 2003, Wal-Mart was plagued
by class-action employment suits (sexual discrimination against women
with nearly 1.5 million potential plaintiffs, employees forced to work
off the clock to avoid overtime payments) and use of illegal immigrants
in cleaning companies.
Target, now the fourth largest retailer in the United States (due
to the Sears/Kmart merger Target moved from third to fourth place) with
1,275 stores and 2004 annual U.S. sales of $48.16 billion. Target has
its roots in the J.L. Hudson company established in 1881 in Michigan and
the largest retailer of men's clothing by 1891. They opened their
first Target store in 1962. Target is considered an "upscale"
discounter with better brands and is very attractive to chic, hip, young
consumers.
JC Penney's is ranked 5th in the retail category for 2004 with
total revenues of $18 billion. JC Penney's stands to suffer from
the Sears/Kmart merger because the move gives SHC an opportunity to grow
off-mall at a rapid pace. Although it appears that SHC may be positioned
more as a discount retailer, which would not directly compete with
Penney's who are known for their value fashions for moderate
consumers, the indirect result for JC Penney's could be problematic
if SHC pulls their stores out of malls (the absence of Sears mall anchor
stores would reduce foot traffic to malls which can ultimately hurt JC
Penney's bottom line) (Howell, 2004).
Clearly, there is no shortage of retail competition between
Wal-Mart, Target, Federated/May Department Stores, J.C. Penney and
others. If SHC were to exclusively focus on the strength of the Sears
brand lines of Kenmore, Craftsman, DieHard, and other home services,
then their competitors would include Home Depot and Lowe's. At the
moment, however, it appears that SHC may be aiming to become more of a
mass merchandiser by cross-selling both hard and soft product lines in
various formats such as Sears Grand, Sears Essentials and mall/off-mall
locations. In this category, Wal-Mart is the undisputed leader.
Competing head-on with Wal-Mart will prove to be a daunting task as
noted by Howard Davidowitz, chairman of consulting and investment
banking firm Davidowitz & Associates, "All the dead retailers
had grandiose plans ... there's been more than 100 casualties.
Nobody has ever taken on Wal-Mart and lived."
The Future of the Sears Holding Company
In order to be successful, SHC's business strategy must
specifically address the issues of competition, culture and synergy in a
very focused way. "Four out of five companies that have attempted
to change business strategies have failed to meet the new
strategy's objectives" (Porter, 1996) and "employees
resisting change may make implementing a strategic change difficult or
impossible" (Lewin, 1952). In terms of competition, the mere
combination of the Sears and Kmart retail empires does not propose any
significant threat to competitors (e.g., Wal-Mart, Target, Home Depot,
etc.) because their consumer messages are more consistent and they
continue to grow by building market share. With regards to culture, both
organizations come from distinct, historic and proud pasts--and it will
be a challenge to combine these disparate entities to form one unique
forward-driven culture. And, finally, while there are countless
opportunities to combine brands, product lines, operations, and systems,
corporate history books are filled with failed mergers (e.g., AOL-Time
Warner) that underscore the difficulty to create synergies at such a
large scale (Sway & Musselman, 2005).
It should be noted that 70% of mergers fall short when it comes to
achieving their targets for revenue synergies, while 40% lead to
cost-synergy disappointment. Other mergers are "dis-synergy
disasters" such as the aforementioned AOL-Time Warner merger, which
resulted in $99 billion in write-downs by January 2003. Miscalculations
of revenue synergies can be attributed to unexpectedly high consumer
defection levels, poor assumptions about market growth and competitive
realities, and overly optimistic prospects for cross-selling
opportunities in a deal's wake. It is also important to make
efforts to retain employees from both companies. Bad assumptions (e.g.,
overly optimistic projections, simplistic predictions and assumptions,
and poor time projections) "will lead to substantial over-estimates
of synergy net present value by making cash flow accretion and other
deal metrics look unrealistically positive" (Frieswick, 2005).
The question looming over the top management of Sears Holding
Company is whether they can create a distinct brand image and identity
to outperform fierce competitors like Walmart and Target. To take on the
competition successfully, key obstacles would be to create a culture of
success among the disparate organizations of Sears and Kmart, to
generate consumer loyalty, and to appropriately position SHC, based on
its identity, in the general merchandise market.
ANALYST REVIEWS
Analysts' reviews of the merger are mixed, ranging from
optimism and faith in the leadership and vision of Lampert to ultimate
failure of SHC (see Exhibit 5). There is, however, much speculation
among analysts as to whether Lampert can successfully accomplish the
stated goals without the selling off of real estate. Hailed by Business
Week as the next Warren Buffet, Lampert closely mirrors Buffet's
strategy of investing in cash rich old line companies and he stands to
benefit enormously from the merger via his private investment fund, ESL Investments, which held 52.6% of Kmart and 14.6% of Sears (pre-merger).
As of March 2005, many industry analysts and insiders remained skeptical
as to Lampert's motives--whether they would build a successful
retail empire or merely generate cash.
REFERENCES
Berner, R. & Weber, J. (2004). Eddie's master stroke.
Business Week, November 29, 34-36.
Clark, K. (2004). Kmart orders out. Chain Store Age, 80(12), 39-40.
Frieswick, K. (2005). Fool's gold. CFO Magazine, February 1.
Retrieved from: <http://www.cfo.com>.
Garbato, D. (2005). Team grit, Retail Merchandiser, 45(2), 4.
Guy, S. (2005). Brands a key in success of merger. Chicago
Sun-Times, March 22, 49.
Howell, D. (2004). New no. 3 on paper, but can Sears/Kmart deliver?
DSN Retailing Today, 43(23), 3, 85.
Kennedy, K. (2005). Retailing changes create opportunities. FDM,
77(3), 18.
Lewin, K. (1952). Group decision and social change. In G. E.
Swanson, T. M. Newcombe, & E. L. Harley (Eds.), Readings in Social
Psychology (2nd ed.), 459-473. New York: Holt.
Ostroff, J. (2005). Store mergers to roil suppliers. Kiplinger
Business Forecasts, March 8.
Porter, M. E. (1996). What is strategy? Harvard Business Review,
74(6), 61-78.
SHC Press Release. (2004). Kmart Holding Corporation and Sears,
Roebuck and Co. agree to m erge. November 17. Retrieved from:
<www.searsholdings.com>.
SHC Press Release. (2005). Kmart and Sears complete merger to form
Sears Holdings Corporation. March 24. Retrieved from:
<www.searsholdings.com>.
Sway, R., & Musselman, F. (2005). 2004: A very good year.
Display & Design Ideas, 17(3), 34-50.
Exhibit 3: Pre-Merger Operations and Financial Comparisons of Sears and
Kmart
(data as of 1/1/05)
Item Sears Kmart
1/1/05 Revenue $36,099,000,000 $17,072,000,000
Full-time employees 247,000 158,000
# Shares outstanding 253,824 89,629
Dividends per share $0.92 $0
Earnings per share $1.53 $2.52
Price per share 52 Week High: $50.49 52 Week High: $99.64
52 Week Low: $49.81 52 Week Low: $97.35
Stockholder's equity $6,092,000,000 $2,192,000,000
Long term debt $3,473,000,000 $477,000,000
Total assets $22,474,000,000 $6,084,000,000
Total liabilities 16,382,000,000 $3,892,000,000
Return on equity 5.45% 11.31%
Return on assets 1.48% 4.08%
Return on investment (1.36) 106.77
Net profit margin (1.40%) 1.45
Total debt to equity 0.57 0.22
ratio
Fortune 2005 Overall score: 6.67, Overall score: 4.22,
"America's Most ranked third behind ranked tenth
Admired Wal-Mart (7.86) and following Wal-Mart,
Companies"--General Kohl's (6.71) and Kohl's, Sears, J.C.
Merchandisers moved from fourth to Penney, Federated
third place over last Dept. Stores, Target,
year Dollar General, May
Dept. Stores and
Dillard's and moved
from eleventh to
tenth place over last
year
Number of stores in 873 full-line 1,511 (includes
U.S. department stores, Puerto Rico, Guam and
1,307 specialty the U.S. Virgin
format stores (auto, Islands) and 60 Kmart
neighborhood Supercenters.
hardware) and 15
Lands' End retail
stores.
Fortune 500 Ranked 32 in 2004, Ranked 67 in 2004,
was 30 in 2003. was 39 in 2003.
Analysis In 2004, total In 2004, Kmart did
revenue decreased not have a 10K
12.2% from 2003 filing. In 2003,
(attributable to the Kmart was in the
decline in credit and midst of reorganizing
financial products from its 2002 Chapter
revenues as a result 11 filing, which
of the sale of the resulted in the
domestic Credit and closing of 284 stores
Financial Products and the elimination
business). of 22,000 jobs and a
charge of more than
$1 billion.
In 2003, total In 2003, total
revenue decreased revenue decreased
0.6% from 2002. 15.4% from 2002.
Business Description: Home group: Includes Home group: Includes
appliances, appliances,
electronics, home electronics, home
fashions, home fashions, fitness and
improvement products sports equipment and
(e.g., tools, fitness includes the Martha
equipment, lawn and Stewart Everyday
garden equipment) and brand.
includes the Kenmore,
Craftsman and
WeatherBeater brands.
Apparel/Accessories: Apparel/Accessories:
Includes apparel and Includes apparel and
footwear, jewelry and footwear, jewelry and
accessories and accessories and
includes the Land's includes the Disney,
End, Covington, Jaclyn Smith, Joe
Canyon River Blues, Boxer, Route 66,
Apostrophe and TKS Thalia Sodi, Sesame
Basics brands. Street and Kathy
Ireland brands.
Sears Auto Centers:
includes automotive
services and sales of
tires and batteries
including the DieHard
brand.
Sears has 1,000 Kmart Supercenters:
specialty stores in 60 stores that
off-the-mall combine a grocery,
locations, an deli and bakery along
internet retail site with general
(sears.com), 792 merchandise.
dealer stores (which
are primarily
independently owned),
245 hardware stores
(Sears Hardware and
Orchard Supply
Hardware), 18 The
Great Indoors stores
(specializing in home
decorating and
remodeling
interiors), and 45
Sears Outlet stores
(carrying overstocks
and discount
merchandise).
Significant Sears Canada: Similar No significant
International to U.S. operations presence outside of
Presence with 122 department the U.S.
stores, 42 furniture
and appliance stores,
144 dealer stores,
14 outlet stores, 53
floor covering
stores, 49 automotive
centers, 110 travel
offices and 2,200
catalog pick-up
locations. Sells
brands similar to
those sold in the
U.S.
Motto and Business Motto: "Satisfaction Motto: Unclear. No
Model guaranteed or your reference of a formal
money back." Their motto can be traced.
vision is to be the
preferred and most
trusted resource for
products and services
that enhances its
customers' home and
family life.
Business Model: To Business Model: The
offer a compelling historical core
customer value competency of Kmart
proposition through is in designing and
the combination of sourcing apparel and
high quality products in its merchandising
and services at and marketing
competitive prices. approach on quality
This is affected by brand names.
low pricing and
promotional
activities, and
minimization of
product and service
costs. This is
achieved through
economies of scale,
centralized overhead
expense structure,
reinvestment of
operating cash flows
into capital
projects, and quality
improvements in
proprietary brands.
To return profits to
shareholders, issue
dividends, repurchase
shares, and increase
share price.
Differentiation: By Differentiation: By
offering high quality designing and
national brands as sourcing its apparel.
well as Sears
proprietary brands
which enjoy high
levels of consumer
awareness, trust and
integrity (Kenmore,
Craftsman, DieHard
and Land's End brands
are offered
exclusively at
Sears stores) and
retail-related
services such as
delivery,
installation, product
repair, product
warranty, and
protection services.
Pre-merger Pre-merger
challenges: Retail challenges: Kmart has
stores within a been challenged by
mall-based format are competitors like
not preferred by Wal-Mart and Target
consumers. Sears has and was forced to
been challenged by close stores,
competitors that eliminate jobs and
specialize in certain declare Chapter 11
types of consumer Bankruptcy in 2002
goods and Sears was due to a rapid
focused on being the decline in liquidity
lowest cost provider which resulted from
in those categories. below-plan sales and
earnings performance
in the 4th quarter of
fiscal 2001, the
evaporation of the
surety bond market,
erosion of supplier
confidence, intense
competition,
unsuccessful sales
and marketing
initiative, and the
continuing recession
and capital market
volatility. After
emerging as Kmart
Holding Corp., the
focus was to generate
profitable sales,
control costs,
streamline overhead,
increase asset
productivity, and
improve customer
service.
Exhibit 4: SHC's Top Management Team
Sears Holding Corp. (SHC)
Board Size: 11 (Chair, Vice Chair, CEO, CFO, and 7 Directors)
Top Management Team
Name Age SHC Position Background
Edward S. Lampert 43 Chairman Chairman, Kmart
Alan J. Lacy 51 Vice Chairman Chair/CEO, Sears
Aylwin B. Lewis 50 Pres/CEO CEO, Kmart
William C. Crowley 47 EVP/CFO CFO, Sears
Maureen McGuire N/A EVP/Chief Marketing VP-Strategy/
Officer Marketing, IBM
Corwin Yulinsky N/A EVP-Customer Consultant,
Strategy McKinsey SVP-
Customer Strategy,
Chase
Lisa Schultz 50 EVP-Apparel Design SVP/Chief Creative
Officer, Kmart
Karen A. Austin 43 SVP/CIO SVP/CIO, Kmart
Julie Younglove-Webb 35 SVP/GM-Sears VP-Space Planning,
Essentials and Kmart
Sears Grand
Teresa Byrd 56 SVP/GM-The Great VP/General
Indoors Merchandise
Manager-Sears
Grand, Sears
Chris Shimojima N/A VP-Merchandising VP/GM-Sears
and Marketing, Customer Direct,
Customer Direct Sears
Andrea L. Zopp 48 SVP/General Counsel General Counsel,
Sears Logistics
Edgar (Ted) McDougal N/A VP, Public SVP-Public
Relations Relations and
Government
Affairs, Sears
Exhibit 5: Analysts' Reviews
Date Positive Reviews Negative Reviews Source
November 18, There are "two Ascribe
2004 threats Newswire, "Iowa
immediately for State Sources
the merged Offer Expertise,
firms: debt will Perspective on
be more Sears/Kmart
expensive Merger
because bond-
rating firms are
downgrading
Sears' credit-
worthiness, and
the power and
growth of Web
shopping are
weak areas for
both firms ...
neither Sears
nor Kmart have
strong Internet
sales....
Walmart.com and
Target.com have
seen significant
growth in sales
but this merger
is not likely to
improve the
internet
presence for
Kmart or Sears"
(Cynthia
Jeffrey,
Associate
Professor, Iowa
State College of
Business).
November 22, They will Retail
2004 provide a Merchandiser,
compelling power "Consultants
brand statement Question Success
in both fashion of Sears/Kmart
and home Merger
categories that
will drive
shoppers to the
stores. If they
pool their war
chest of brand
names and become
one, they may
solve the "brand
image" problem
that has eluded
both Sears Grand
expectations
should benefit
from Kmart's
experience in
the consumables
market.
November 22, Sears has long Retail
2004 offered ethnic- Merchandiser,
specific Consultants
programs.... Question Success
Kmart has just of Sears/Kmart
begun to Merger
"officially"
target
Hispanics....
Perhaps bringing
the benefits of
big box
retailing
combined with
these power
brands to inner
city, lower
income, ethnic
shoppers will
provide the
right niche for
a still under
served audience.
November 22, "Long-term, the Business and
2004 combined Industry, HFN,
entity's success "The Big Deal:
will hinge on S-Mart?", by
execution, where Barbara Thau,
neither company pg. 1, ISSN:
had a 1082-3010
particularly
good track
record.... In
our view,
neither
management team
brings a
significant
track record of
operating
success to the
transaction....
Still, better
real estate
locations will
give them access
to greater
customer
traffic, so we
think it would
be rash to
discount the
deal entirely"
(Danielle Fox,
Merrill Lynch
analyst).
November 22, "We do not Business and
2004 believe that Industry, HFN,
adding Sears "The Big Deal:
appliances to S-Mart?", by
Kmarts or Joe Barbara Thau,
Boxer apparel to pg. 1, ISSN:
Sears will turn 1082-3010
either company
around" (George
Strachan,
Goldman Sachs
analyst).
November 29, Overall, Kmart Business and
2004 brings stronger Industry, HFN,
soft home goods "Battle of the
to the Brands for Kmart
merger ... the and Sears," pg.
Martha Stewart 4, ISSN:
brand will be 1082-0310
re-energized and
become the focus
private-label
brand for the
merged chain.
November 30, Most analysts Retail
2004 are skeptical Merchandiser,
the combination "How Kmart-Sears
of two Merger Affects
struggling Suppliers"
retail brands
that will
continue to
operate
separately will
thrive in a
sector dominated
by Wal-Mart.
February 10, "You have two Gallup
2005 retailers who Management
are doing badly Journal, "Merger
right now ... Myopia: Two
It's hard to retail giants
fathom how join forces. But
combining them how will the
is suddenly customer
going to produce benefit?" by
a new entity William J.
that will do McEwen
better" (Stephen
Hoch, The
Wharton School).
March 24, "It's about The Associated
2005 profitability, Press, "Kmart
not about sales. Buyout of Sears
It may get Gets Final
smaller, but ... Approval;
it's going to be Changes Loom,"
more profitable, by Dave
more stable, Carpenter
with a better
strategy. And
it'll be more
competitive with
Wal-Mart and
Target" (Richard
Hastings,
independent
retail analyst).
March 24, "For the short The Associated
2005 term, it's very Press, "Kmart
exciting. But Buyout of Sears
for the long Gets Final
term, watch Approval;
out." Davidoff Changes Loom,"
forecasts a by Dave
"bleak outlook" Carpenter
for Sears unless
the move away
from malls is
successful
(Howard
Davidoff,
Davidoff and
Associates).
Noushi Rahman, Pace University Alan B. Eisner, Pace University