It workers on outsourcing: what about me? What about the profession?
Brooks, Nita G. ; Miller, Robert E. ; Korzaan, Melinda L. 等
INTRODUCTION
IT outsourcing is not by any means a new phenomenon. Outsourcing of
IT functions can be traced back to the early 1960's when EDS took
over the data processing functions of two large companies: Frito-Lay and
Blue Cross (Lacity & Hirchheim, 1993). Loh and Venkatramen (1992)
coined the phrase "Kodak effect" to refer to the impact of
Kodak's arrangement to turn over the majority of their IT
operations to IBM, Businessland, and DEC on IT outsourcing in general.
Since that time, IT outsourcing has grown and is considered a viable and
strategic option for organizations. Organizations use different sourcing
strategies ranging from total outsourcing to selective outsourcing.
Firms continue to outsource "an increasingly large range of and
depth of services" (Barthelemy & Geyer, 2004, p. 91), this
proliferation of IT outsourcing is not anticipated to slowdown in the
near future (Computer Economics, 2006).
A current trend is also emerging in which medium and small-sized
companies are jumping on the IT outsourcing bandwagon. While large
organizations have historically outsourced their IT functions, today
small firms are progressively farming out IT operations to companies
that provide a range of options for the smaller scale business.
"Overall, small and medium-sized businesses are forecast to make up
two-thirds of the outsourced help-desk market in 2011" (Tam, 2007,
p. B.5). Therefore, the effects of outsourcing are touching an
increasingly wider range of companies and industries.
Economic indicators and uncertainty have further perpetuated the
outsourcing trend (Business Wire, 2008). Many companies have come to
believe that outsourcing is good for the bottom-line. Chrysler, a
company which has struggled for years, has taken this idea to heart by
incorporating additional IT outsourcing as part of its plan for recovery
(Overby, 2008). While many companies are outsourcing to domestic firms,
a growing number have decided specifically to outsource offshore.
Companies are driven to offshore outsourcing because they have become
convinced it is necessary in order to be competitive in the global
economy (HR Focus, 2008). The demand for offshore outsourcing is so
great that IBM "announced plans to invest $6 billion in India to
expand its workforce there" (Songini, 2007, p. 1).
Given the significance of outsourcing, it is not surprising that
the phenomenon has been widely investigated by IT researchers. Studies
have examined why organizations outsource and the motivations behind
outsourcing arrangements (Lacity & Hirschheim, 1995); the
relationships between client firms and vendors (Kim & Chung, 2003);
and how the technology acceptance model can be used to examine
intentions to outsource (Benamati & Fajkumar, 2002). Within this
body of research, there has, however, been a noticeable lack of
attention given to the IT worker. This is somewhat surprising
considering the need for organizations to recruit and retain talented
and creative IT workers.
As indicated by recent research, organizations of all sizes intend
to increase their IT workforce by the year 2008 (Zweig, 2006). At the
same time organizations are adding to the IT workforce pool, as just
discussed, they are increasing their use of outsourcing as a means to
reduce costs. While these two ideas seem to be in conflict, they are
not. In a recent IT workforce trends study, median firms indicated that
they expect to source approximately 17% of their IT workforce in certain
positions and to increase their IT workforce in other areas (Zweig,
2006). While not all positions in the IT profession are moving to
outsourcing vendors off-shore, it is important to note the impact these
changes in strategy can have on the profession as a whole. For example,
educational programs in information technology and information systems
have experienced lower and lower enrollments. It could be that a
misperception about the impact of outsourcing on the profession is a
cause (Panko, 2008).
As stated by Barthelemy (2003), one of the "deadliest
sins" of management when engaging in outsourcing ventures is to
overlook workforce issues. It is imperative that organizations recognize
and acknowledge the IT worker when engaging in sourcing arrangements.
Only one study was found that examined IT worker perceptions of
outsourcing and how those perceptions impacted outcomes (Kennedy, Holt,
Ward, & Rheg, 2002).
In order to more thoroughly understand how IT workers perceive
outsourcing and how those perceptions impact outcomes, a research
framework was developed. This framework was then used as a guide for a
field study targeting IT workers from various organizations and
industries. A complete discussion of the framework, field study, and
study results are provided. Implications for managers and organizations
are discussed as well along with directions for future research.
RESEARCH FRAMEWORK
In order to more accurately and thoroughly understand how IT
workers perceive the impact of outsourcing, it was first necessary to
develop a research framework to serve as a guide. As stated previously,
only one study was found that empirically examined how IT workers
perceived outsourcing (Kennedy, et al., 2002). The sample for this study
was taken from Air Force engineering managers and focused only on how
the individuals in the study perceived outsourcing would, in the future,
impact their job functions.
There are actually many ways in which outsourcing can impact
individuals in relation to recruitment and retention. For example, if an
individual perceives that outsourcing will negatively impact their job
or place in the profession, it would be more likely that the individual
would seek out other career or job opportunities. If the individual
perceives that outsourcing currently has impacted their job, the
outcomes could be different. It is possible that both perceptions of
outsourcing's impact could inherently influence the
individual's perception that the profession is breaching a
perceived or psychological contract. This could prove to be very
significant as it relates to key outcomes such as recruitment and
retention.
Another perspective taken in this study relates to how individuals
view outsourcing's impact on the profession as a whole and not
solely on them personally. For example, if an individual feels that
outsourcing will negatively impact the IT profession, they would be less
likely to join and more likely to leave the profession. The temporal
aspect is also important here. If the individual feels that outsourcing
has negatively impacted the profession, would they be more inclined to
leave? These different perceptions were taken into account in creating
the research framework presented and used here.
The framework, provided in Figure 1 as mentioned, was developed to
serve as a guide to examining individual attitudes towards IT
outsourcing. The framework is unique in that it considers two main
factors: 1) the target of the perceptions (individual or IT profession)
and 2) the temporal component (present and future). By focusing on these
specific areas, it may be possible to better understand how the
individual's attitudes could impact factors such as entry into the
profession, job performance, career decisions, satisfaction and
commitment to the profession, and intention to turnover from the
profession.
[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]
In order to explore the importance of the perceptions highlighted
in Figure 1, it is necessary to relate them to outcomes. Within the body
of research examining the IT workforce, there have been several key
outcomes noted as important to retention. Two primary outcomes include
satisfaction and intention to turnover. The majority of work on the IT
worker has focused on attitudes and behaviors within an organizational
setting. Within this body of work, job satisfaction and career
satisfaction have been shown to impact organizational commitment and
intention to turnover from the organization (Igbaria & Greenhaus,
1992; Gupta, Guimaraes, & Raghunathan, 1992; and Igbaria &
Siegel, 1993), and intention to turnover from the organization has been
shown to impact actual turnover (Thatcher, Stepina, & Boyle, 2003).
This study provides a broader examination of IT worker perceptions
that extend beyond the current organization. Perceptions are studied
related to how outsourcing has/will personally impact the individual and
how outsourcing has/will impact the profession. Outcomes studied relate
to the individual's place in the profession and include overall
career satisfaction, general satisfaction with the profession, and
intention to turnover from the profession. The research method and
measures used in this study are discussed in the following section.
Results of the analysis are also provided.
RESEARCH METHOD
Individuals currently working in the IT profession were targeted
from several large organizations in the U.S. Each person was sent an
email explaining the study and requesting his or her participation. A
link to a web survey was provided in the email. All individuals were
assured anonymity. Eight-hundred and twelve (812) individuals were
contacted requesting their participation in this study. Usable responses
were received from 454 individuals representing an overall response rate
of 56%.
Demographics for the sample are provided in Table 1. The sample
consisted of 61.7% male respondents. The average age of the participants
was 39.7. Despite efforts to receive adequate representation from
different minority groups, approximately 87.4% of sample participants
were white. The majority of the participants worked full time (93%); had
an undergraduate degree or higher (71%); were married or living with a
partner (71.8%); and represented a variety of IT positions.
The average number of years spent in the IT profession for this
sample was 14, and the average number of organizations worked for as an
IT professional was 2.85. Thirty-eight different companies are
represented in the sample. The majority of respondents (approximately
90%) were from seven organizations providing representation from state
government, healthcare, information systems, transportation, and energy
industries.
In order to measure how individual IT workers perceive the impact
of outsourcing on them and on the profession (now and in the future),
items were developed to reflect each component of the framework. The
instrument provided by Kennedy, et al. (2002) was used a guide for
creating the new items. The Kennedy, et al. (2002) items had to be
modified because the study focused solely on how outsourcing would
impact the individual's job in the future and did not consider the
impact outsourcing has had on the individual or the individual's
place in the profession.
Measures for outcome variables (general satisfaction with the
profession, overall career satisfaction, and intention to turnover from
the profession) were based on existing instruments. General satisfaction
with the profession was measured using two items provided by Hackman and
Oldham (1976). Career satisfaction was measured using five items from
Greenhaus, Parasuraman, and Wormley (1990), and intention to turnover
from the profession was measured with four items from Meyer, Allen, and
Smith (1993).
In order to determine the validity of the perception factors
presented in the framework in Figure 1, a factor analysis was conducted
using orthogonal rotation. Items and factor loadings are provided in
Table 2. After reviewing the factor matrix, it was apparent that there
was no distinction made by individuals in this sample related to the
temporal aspect provided in the research framework. Individuals did not
differentiate between outsourcing's impact on them now versus its
impact on them in the future.
Factors did emerge for constructs related to the individual and the
profession as expected. Slight cross loadings were revealed between two
items (out5 and out6). These items measure career security. Individuals
in the sample may have seen career security as transcending the
individual/profession line if they perceived career security as being
tied to their current place in IT. However, since both items are below
the .50 threshold recommended for practical significance (Hair, et al.,
2006) it was determined to leave them for this analysis.
RESEARCH RESULTS
The factor analysis provided in the previous section indicates that
individuals do perceive a difference in how outsourcing impacts them
versus how it impacts the profession. Descriptive statistics,
correlations, and reliabilities are provided in Table 3 for the two
factor solution and the outcomes included in the study. Reliabilities
for all constructs were well above the recommended .70 cutoff (Hair, et
al., 2006).
Findings from the correlation matrix reveal that perceptions of
outsourcing are significantly related to key outcomes. Perceptions of
outsourcing's impact on the individual were found to be
significantly and negatively related to career satisfaction and general
satisfaction with the profession, and positively related to intention to
turnover from the profession. Perceptions of outsourcing's impact
on the profession as a whole were found to be negatively related to
career satisfaction and positively related to intention to turnover from
the profession. Strong and positive relationships exist, as would be
expected, between how individuals perceive the impact of outsourcing on
themselves and the impact of outsourcing on the profession.
Although the two perception measures may be correlated, a
comparison of the means indicates that, in general, individuals
perceived outsourcing's impact on the profession be to more
negative than its impact on them personally. The implications of this
finding, as well as those presented previously will be discussed in the
following section.
Additional analysis was conducted to determine if the perceptions
differed based on key demographic factors: gender and age. For this
sample, there were no significant differences found in the perceptions
of outsourcing's impact on the individual or the profession when
comparing men and women. These results are consistent with previous
findings indicating that men and women tend to have similar perceptions
of career experiences (Sumner & Niederman, 2003/2004). For this
sample, men tended to have slightly more negative perceptions of
outsourcing's impact overall. To examine if there were any
differences based on age, a one-way ANOVA was used. As with gender,
there were no significant differences indicated among the various age
groups examined.
[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]
IMPLICATIONS
Findings from this study revealed two important issues: 1)
individuals in the IT profession perceive outsourcing's impact on
the profession differently from its impact on them personally and 2) the
IT worker's perceptions of outsourcing's impact have
implications for outcomes such as satisfaction and turnover intention.
This study shows that IT professionals are aware of outsourcing's
impact on themselves and on their profession. The results indicate that,
both personally and professionally, outsourcing was perceived to have a
negative impact.
Regardless of which positions are actually being outsourced and
which are in higher demand locally, individuals in the IT profession
view outsourcing as having a negative impact. Also, the fact that IT
professionals actually differentiate in their perceptions of
outsourcing's impact on themselves as compared to the profession is
quite interesting. Instead of portending a future of doom and gloom it
appears that IT professionals can acknowledge the negative impact of
outsourcing on the profession without necessarily internalizing the
fact. Based on this rationalization, IT professionals may not be
"driven off" from the profession as some have suggested. The
ability to differentiate may also mean that IT recruiting is not a
"lost cause". It does, however, provide some evidence that
recruitment and retention efforts should work to attenuate these
negative feelings.
That said, the study's findings are hardly all positive. In
fact, it is clear from the results that perceptions of
outsourcing's impact are significantly related to negative
workforce outcomes. These findings support Barthelemy's (2003)
assertion that management must consider workforce issues when engaging
in outsourcing. An organization's plan to start outsourcing, or to
expand current outsourcing levels, can lead to serious workforce issues.
If an organization's foray into outsourcing is to be successful,
management must give all due consideration to the organization's
existing workforce. Failure to address current employee issues can lead
to a drop in worker satisfaction and ultimately higher turnover.
Along with the previous findings, it is interesting to note that
individuals did not perceive a difference in outsourcing's impact
in relation to time. There were no distinctions made by IT professionals
in terms of outsourcing's current versus future impact. This
appears to indicate that IT professionals do not perceive
outsourcing's impact will increase with time. Said another way, IT
professionals may believe outsourcing has already had its major impact.
Individuals may view it as one of many possible strategies for
management to use to meet organizational needs.
CONCLUSION
While the study presented herein has examined a number of issues
related to IT professionals and their perceptions of outsourcing, other
issues remain to be addressed. As an example, the ability of IT
professionals to differentiate between outsourcing's impact on the
profession and its impact on them personally should be investigated
further. It would be interesting to examine the influence of personality
traits and how they might relate to the ability to differentiate
impacts. In particular, researchers could investigate the role of locus
of control in the perception of impacts on the individual versus the
profession.
Research shows that the use of IT outsourcing shows no sign of
stopping. Whether these outsourced IT jobs go to domestic or offshore
firms, the impact on the IT workforce will continue to be significant.
As such, furthering our understanding of outsourcing's impact on
current and potential IT workers is a must.
REFERENCES
Barthelemy, J. (2003). The Seven Deadly Sins of Outsourcing.
Academy of Management Executive, 17(2), 87-98.
Barthelemy, J., & Geyer, D. (2004). the Determinants of Total
IT Outsourcing: An Empirical Investigation of French and German Firms.
Journal of Computer Information Systems, 44(3), 91-97.
Benamati, J., & Fajkumar, T. (2002). The Application
Development Outsourcing Decision: An Application of the Technology
Acceptance Model. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 42(4), 35-43.
Greenhaus, J., Parasuraman, S., & Wormley, W. (1990). Effects
of Race on Organizational Experiences, Job Performance Evaluations, and
Career Outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 33(1), 64-86.
Growth of IT Outsourcing: No End in Sight. (2008, August).
Retrieved July 14, 2008, from Computer Economics:
http://www.computereconomics.com/article.cfm?id=1161
Gupta, Y., Guimaraes, T., & Raghunathan, T. (1992). Attitudes
and Intentions of Information Center Personnel. Information and
Management, 22 (3), 151-160.
Hackman, J., & Oldham, G. (1976). Motivation through the Design
of Work: Test of a Theory. Organizational Behavior and Human
Performance, 16, 250-279.
Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., Anderson, R., & Tatham, R.
(2006). Multivariate Data Analysis. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey:
Prentice Hall.
Igbaria, M., & Greenhaus, J. (1992). Determinants of MIS
Employees' Turnover Intentions. Communications of the ACM, 35 (2),
35-49.
Igbaria, M., & Siegel, S. (1993). The Career Decision of IS
People. Information and Management, 24(1), 23-32.
Kennedy, J., Holt, D., Ward, M., & Rheg, M. (2002). The
Influence of Outsourcing on Job Satisfaction and Turnover Intentions of
Technical Managers. Human Resource Planning, 24(1), 23-31.
Kim, S., & Chung, Y. (2003). Critical Success Factors for IS
Outsourcing Implementation from an Interorganizational Relationship
Perspective. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 43(4), 81-90.
Lacity, M., & Hirschheim, R. (1995). Information Systems
Outsourcing Bandwagon: The Insourcing Response. Chichester, England:
John Wiley.
Lacity, M., & Hirschheim, R. (1993). Information Systems
Outsourcing: Myths, Metaphors, and Realities. Chichester, England: John
Wiley and Sons, Ltd.
Loh, L., & Venkatraman, N. (1992). Diffusion of Information
Technology Outsourcing: Influence Sources and the Kodak Effect.
Information Systems Research, 3(4), 334-358.
Meyer, J., Allen, N., & Smith, C. (1993). Commitment to
Organizations and Occupations: Extension and Test of a Three Component
Conceptualization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 538-551.
Overby, S. (2008, April 9). Chrysler Stakes Turnaround on IT
Outsourcing. Retrieved July 14, 2008, from CIO:
http://advice.cio.com/stephanie_overby/
chrysler_stakes_turnaround_on_it_outsourcing
Panko, R.R. (2008). IT Employment Prospects: Beyond the Dotcom
Bubble. MIS Quarterly Executive, 17, 182-197.
Songini, M. L. (1007, April 2). Circuit City Awards $775M IT
Outsourcing Contract to IBM. Retrieved July 14, 2008, from
Computerworld: http://www.computerworld.com/action/
article.do?command=viewArticleBase&articleid=9015341
Sumner, M., & Niederman, F. (2003/2004). The Impact of Gender
Differences on Job Satisfaction, Job Turnover, and Career Experiences of
Information Systems Professionals. Journal of Computer Information
Systems, 44(2), 29-39.
Tam, P. (2007, April 17). Business Technology: Outsourcing Finds
New Niche; More Small Firms Farm out Tech Work to Tap Experts, Pare
Costs. Wall Street Journal , p. B5.
Thatcher, J., Stepina, L., & Boyle, R. (2003). Turnover of IT
Workers: Examining Empirically the Influence of Attitudes, Job
Characteristics, and External Markets. Journal ofManagementInformation
systems, 19(3), 231261.
Will More Offshoring Be a Result of Economic Uncertainties. (2008).
HR Focus, 85(6), 9.
Worldwide Outsourcing Industry Rebounding, According to
EquaTerra's 4Q07 Pulse Survey. (2008, January 18). Retrieved July
14, 2008, from Business Wire:
http://www.reuters.com/article/pressRelease/
idUS155349+18Jan-2008+BW20080118
Nita G. Brooks, Middle Tennessee State University
Robert E. Miller, Ashland University
Melinda L. Korzaan, Middle Tennessee State University
Table 1: Respondent Demographics
Gender
Male 61.7%
Female 37.7%
Missing 0.7%
Ethnicity
White 87.4%
African-American 6.2%
Hispanic 1.5%
Other 4.2%
Missing 0.7%
Education
Some College 10.3%
Associates Degree 8.1%
Undergraduate Degree 57.2%
Masters Degree 14.0%
Other 1.8%
Missing 8.6%
Marital Status
Never Married 15.0%
Married/Living with Partner 71.8%
Separated/Divorced 9.3%
Widowed 0.9%
Missing 3.1%
Age
20-29 17.2%
30-39 31.3%
40-49 31.5%
50-59 13.6%
60+ 2.6%
Missing 3.7%
Table 2: Factor Loadings for Outsourcing Perceptions
Factor Loadings
1 2
Impact on Individual
Outsourcing ...
has negatively .807 .258
influenced my IT
career. (out1)
will, in the future, .815 .389
negatively influence
my IT career. (out2)
has negatively .849 .278
impacted my mobility
in the IT
profession. (out3)
will, in the future, .830 .372
negatively impact my
mobility in the IT
profession. (out4)
has caused my IT .772 .444
career to become
less secure. (out5)
will, in the future, .757 .492
cause my IT career
to become less
secure. (out6)
has greatly reduced .830 .303
my opportunities for
advancement in the
IT profession.
(out7)
will, in the future, .794 .395
greatly reduce my
opportunities for
advancement in the
IT profession.
(out8)
Impact on Profession
Outsourcing
has caused jobs .357 .833
across the IT
profession to become
less secure. (out9)
will, in the future, .336 .854
cause jobs across
the IT profession to
become less secure.
(out10).
has negatively .344 .864
impacted the
mobility of
individuals across
the IT profession.
(out11)
will, in the future, .335 .875
negatively impact
the mobility of
individuals across
the IT profession.
(out12)
has negatively .386 .828
influenced career
advancement
opportunities for
individual in the IT
profession. (out13)
will, in the future, .384 .840
negatively influence
career advancement
opportunities for
individuals in the
IT profession.
(out14)
Table 3: Descriptive Statistics, Reliabilities, and
Correlations among Study Variables
Measure M 1 2 3
(SD)
1. Outsourcing 3.9559 (.96)
(Impact on Individual) (1.57)
2. Outsourcing 4.9284 .733 ** (.97)
(Impact on Profession) (1.43)
3. Career Satisfaction 4.7605 -.209 ** -.112 * (.90)
(1.25)
4. General Satisfaction 5.2467 -.167 ** -.047 .574 **
(1.18)
5. Turnover Intention 3.7124 .184 ** .171 ** -.338 **
(.921)
Measure 4 5
1. Outsourcing
(Impact on Individual)
2. Outsourcing
(Impact on Profession)
3. Career Satisfaction
4. General Satisfaction (.91)
5. Turnover Intention -.499 ** (.88)
** = p <.01