Black families and socio-economic inequality in Canada.
Livingstone, Anne-Marie ; Weinfeld, Morton
Abstract
There have been virtually no recent census-based studies on the
familial characteristics of black Canadians. The present study is a
partial replication and extension of a study on black families published
two decades ago by Christensen and Weinfeld (1993) and based on the 1986
Canadian census. The present paper utilizes the 2006 census in order to
examine the current conditions of black families in Canada and assess
what has changed since 1986 in the composition, marital status, and
income of these families. Findings indicate that black families are more
culturally heterogeneous than ever. Despite this, racial disparities in
family formation and household income have only accentuated since 1986,
bearing unique consequences for native and foreign-born black men and
women. On the whole, relatively more black Canadians 25-44 years of age
were single and never married, divorced, or separated in 2006 than in
1986. Between 1986 and 2006, the disparities in income between black
families with young children and the general population have grown
larger, both for single and dual parent families. The consequences of
higher family instability, lone-parent families, economic insecurity and
poverty for black families can only be detrimental for the welfare of
children, particularly in a context of racial inequality. These issues
deserve to be further investigated.
Resume
Il n'existe aucune etude recente sur les caracteristiques des
familles noires au Canada qui se base sur les donnees du recensement. En
plus de presenter de nouvelles analyses sur les familles noires, cette
etude reprend en partie celles effectuees il y a 20 ans par Christensen
et Weinfeld (1993) a l'aide des donnees du recensement de 1986. Les
objectifs sont, d'une part, d'examiner les circonstances des
familles noires selon la composition du menage, le statut conjugal et le
revenu familial par le biais du recensement de 2006 et, d'autre
part, de comparer ces resultats avec les donnees de 1986.
L'heterogeneite culturelle des familles noires va grandissante. Les
resultats demontrent que les disparites raciales ont augmente au sein de
la population noire depuis 1986 quant a la formation des familles et le
revenu des menages, et imposent des consequences uniques pour les femmes
et hommes noirs nes au Canada ou a l'exterieur. Entre 1986 et 2006,
les disparites de revenu ont augmente entre les menages comprenant des
enfants noirs et la population generale. Ces disparites sont presentes
autant chez les familles monoparentales que biparentales.
L'instabilite conjugale, vivre dans une famille monoparentale,
l'insecurite economique et la pauvrete peuvent avoir des effets
nefastes pour le bien-etre des enfants issus de familles de la minorite
noire et ce, particulierement dans un contexte d'inegalites
raciales. Ces questions meritent d'etre approfondies.
INTRODUCTION
The present paper discusses findings from an exploratory and
descriptive study on black families in Canada that seeks to explore the
conditions of black families in 2006 and assess the degree to which
circumstances have changed or improved for these families since 1986.
The study is a partial replication and extension of a previous
census-based study on black families in 1986, published by Christensen
and Weinfeld (1993). To the best of our knowledge, the study has never
been replicated. It is not yet certain how or if the voluntary nature of
the new National Household Survey of 2011 will impact responses to
questions on racial origin or income for disadvantaged groups. We thus
have greater confidence in comparing the Canadian censuses for 1986 and
2006.
In the Canadian literature on racial and ethnic inequalities, much
of the attention has been concentrated on measuring the earnings of
individuals or households; relatively fewer studies have explored the
implications of racial income inequalities for the welfare of families
with children (Picot and Hou 2003; Worswick 1996). The empirical
evidence has consistently shown that blacks and other visible minorities
earn significantly less than white Canadians, even when background
factors are the same (Mensah 2010; Pendakur and Pendakur 2010; Pendakur
and Pendakur 2002; Skuterud 2010).
In the present paper, we explore the association between income
inequality, family structure, and the welfare of black families with
children. The paper is motivated by the well-known finding that poverty
and inequality exert a significant impact on the well-being and
opportunities of families and their children. Studies have repeatedly
shown that the socio-economic status of the family is the most
significant determinant of a child's educational attainment and his
or her long-term employment and earnings in adulthood (Blum, Boyle, and
Offord 1988; Lopoo and DeLeire 2014).
The issues of race, inequality, and family structure have been the
focus of much research in the American socio-demographic literature,
much less so in the Canadian (Allen 1979; Furstenberg 2009; McLanahan
and Percheski 2008). The black population in the United States (US)
differs significantly in terms of history, the legacy of slavery and
racism, the role of recent immigration, and demographic characteristics.
In Canada, the overwhelming majority of blacks are immigrants or the
children of immigrants, in contrast to the US where the majority are
native-born. Nevertheless, similar questions concerning race, income,
family structure and children's life chances can be posed.
One of the principal findings from Christensen and Weinfeld (1993)
was the central role of family structure in accounting for the higher
proportion of black children living in low-income households in 1986. In
general, black children in 1986 were significantly more likely than all
Canadian children to be found in low-income households. However, when
family structure was held constant black children were only slightly
more likely than other Canadian children to be found in low-income
households. Hence, the major cause of low-income was the same for black
children and other Canadian children, namely single-parent status. A
goal of the present paper is to use the 2006 census to revisit this
question and explore the connections between racial inequality, family
structure, and the economic welfare of black families with children in
Canada.
BACKGROUND LITERATURE
Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives
The empirical and theoretical scholarship on black families has a
much longer history in the US, and dates back to the early work of
scholars like W.E.B. Du Bois (1908) and E. Franklin Frazier (1939). In
Canada, there is an impressive body of historical and contemporary
writing about black Canadians, although relatively few publications have
specifically explored the subject of black families (Mensah 2010; Winks
1971). One exception is a book on the Caribbean diaspora in Toronto,
written by Frances Henry (1994), which presents an intimate look at
black family life and relationships.
Given the limitations of the scholarship on black families in
Canada, the present paper reviews the theoretical and empirical
knowledge base on black families in the US in order to gain some
understanding of the forces that may be at work in influencing the
welfare, organization, and challenges of Canadian black families today.
The literature review that follows also briefly discusses the relevant
historical and current research on black families in, or from, the
Caribbean and Latin America (Goulbourne and Chamberlain 2001; Mintz and
Price 1976; Herskovits 1958).
While the scholarship from the US is undeniably insightful and
instructive, it is important to be cautious in generalizing the findings
to the Canadian context. In the US, African-Americans account for about
14% of the entire population; of this proportion, 91% are native-born,
including many who are multi-generational (United States Census Bureau
2011). In Canada, blacks represent roughly 2.5% of the population, and
with the exception of black communities in Nova Scotia, most are
immigrants or the children of immigrants. Despite these differences,
black family structures in the US and Canada do exhibit some
similarities. Therefore, the US literature may offer some helpful hints
for thinking through the causes of racial disparities in family welfare
in Canada.
One issue that has long been at the centre of scholarly debate on
black families in the US is whether racial differences in family
structure are due to class or culture (Allen 1979; Cherlin 1998). These
debates reached their height at the time of the publication of the
well-known Moynihan report on black families, which was released in the
late 1960s and later criticized for fuelling racial stereotypes of black
families as matriarchal and trapped in a "tangle of pathology"
(Moynihan 1967; Furstenberg 2009). Moynihan argued that a major cause
for black inequality in the US was the increase in single parent
families, which he traced to the aftermath of slavery and Jim Crow.
To some extent, the debates provoked by the Moynihan report have
faded. As income inequality has deepened and forced many more American
families into a state of poverty and economic insecurity, racial
disparities in family structure have begun to diminish, particularly
among the poor and working-class. Indeed, the growing convergence in
family structures between low-income black and white families has led
some American scholars to propose that social class is the fundamental
cause of racial disparities in family structure (Furstenberg 2009;
Hummer and Hamilton 2010).
Empirical support for the "social class" argument comes
from the well-established finding that income and education both bear a
significant and positive correlation with a whole host of family-related
variables such as childbearing, marriage, co-habitation, divorce, or
re-marriage (Carlson and England 2011). The relationship between social
class and family formation has also grown stronger as inequality in the
US has intensified. The college-educated in the US today are more likely
than any other group to be married and to bear children in marriage
(Carlson and England 2011; Cherlin 2009). For American women with low to
moderate levels of education, the chances of becoming a single parent
have nearly doubled since 1965 (Cherlin 2009). Qualitative studies have
revealed that low-income black and white women prefer to delay marriage
and put childbearing first because they believe in waiting for a partner
who can guarantee a certain degree of economic security (Edin and
Kefalas 2005; Gibson-Davis, Edin, and McLanahan 2005).
Even when social class is the same, black Americans continue to be
less likely than whites to marry and co-habit, and more likely to be
single parents (Cherlin 1998; Hummer and Hamilton 2010; Raley and
Sweeney 2009). The marital and cohabiting unions of black Americans are
also more fragile (Cherlin 2009; Hummer and Hamilton 2010; Sweeney and
Phillips 2004). These and other findings underscore the role of racial
discrimination in compounding the effects of class inequality (Carlson
and England 2011; White and Rogers 2000). Poverty rates are much higher
among black Americans and even middle-class blacks possess a fraction of
the wealth and assets of middle-class whites (Oliver and Shapiro 2006).
The massive scale of joblessness, declining real wages, and
incarceration of the last decades in the US have wrought devastating
consequences on many black families and created what some have claimed
is a shortage of "marriageable" black men (Wilson 1997). The
impact of incarceration on Canadian black families has yet to be
explored, although racial disparities in federal and provincial prisons
are large and growing (Owusu-Bempah and Wortley 2014; Sapers 2013).
The notion that fewer black men are in a position to marry and
support a family in the US spurred a series of studies examining the
impact of unequal sex ratios on black marriage rates and family
structure. Results have shown that sex ratios do, in fact, bear a
significant correlation with racial differences in marriage, non-marital
childbearing, and lone-parent households (Fosset and Kiecolt 1991;
Lichter, McLaughlin, Kephart, and Landry 1992).
Scholarly interest in the cultural roots of black family structure
waned after the publication of Moynihan's report, but did not
completely disappear. In one recent review, Mill (2009) proposes that
African traditions in the US were either reinforced by slavery (e.g.,
female work roles, extended families) or completely destroyed (e.g.,
polygamy). Scholars have long wondered whether the more extensive
kinship networks of African-Americans are vestiges of an African past or
an adaptation to the instability and harsh realities of plantation
slavery (Angel and Tienda 1982; Cherlin 1998). Sudarkasa (1981; 1998)
contends that black kinship networks have reflected a West African
tradition of valuing consanguineous ties (i.e., blood relations) over
the conjugal bond. Stevenson (1995), on the other hand, contends that
kin networks grew in importance during slavery because they were often
the only structures that could sustain and hold families together when
plantation owners would irrevocably break households apart through the
forced transfer or actual sale of parents, children, and other family
members.
The cultural explanation, while intriguing and certainly relevant,
is hard to prove empirically. Extended family networks have not only
been a trait of black families in the US, but also white families and
other ethnic groups (Dilworth-Anderson, Burton and Johnson 1993; Ruggles
1994). Some findings suggest that kin networks have been denser in black
families because they meet vital economic and practical needs, which
would explain their higher prevalence among single parent black families
(Angel and Tienda 1982). When attitudes towards marriage and family are
examined, few differences between blacks and whites are found; both
groups express an abiding belief in the mainstream ideal of the nuclear
family (Bulcroft and Bulcroft 1993). While some evidence suggests that
blacks and whites hold differing attitudes towards gender, the findings
are inconclusive. Depending on the study, black Americans are either
more egalitarian or more conservative than whites in their views on
gender (Kane 2000).
Compared to the US, there is more definitive evidence of African
cultural survivals in the Caribbean, especially among the descendants of
escaped slaves, such as the Maroons, who established their own
independent settlements in locations safely removed from plantation
slavery (Mintz and Price 1976). On the whole, the consensus seems to be
that family structures in the Caribbean are the products of a long and
devastating history of colonialism and racial and economic oppression.
Due to structural forces like colonial bans on legal marriage, chronic
poverty, and out-migration, black families in the Caribbean have adopted
a fluid and flexible set of arrangements that might consist of
consensual unions, "visiting" unions, extended families, or
female-headed households, in addition to the western model of the
nuclear family and husband-wife dyad (Barrow 2001; Blackwood 2005; Safa
2005). Marriage is particularly infrequent among the poor because there
is a belief that one ought to be financially secure before getting
legally married (Dreher and Hudgins 2010).
In the debates on the class versus culture argument, one issue that
has been relatively neglected is the role of racial discrimination and
its impact on black families. Some of the relevant recent research looks
at race and marriage in the US military (Lundquist 2004; Teachman and
Tedrow 2008). As one of the most racially integrated institutions in the
US, the military serves as a kind of "natural" experiment for
studying the role of race. Unlike any other institution, the military
guarantees that blacks enjoy the same access to basic services and
resources like housing, health care, childcare, and retirement pensions.
In one study, Lunquist (2004) found that racial disparities in marriage
between white and black active duty personnel actually disappeared. In a
second study, Teachman and Tedrow (2008) observed that black men in the
Army showed a substantially lower risk of divorce. When black men
returned to civilian life, their rate of divorce went back to its
pre-existing level. The authors infer from these findings that
opportunities in the military put blacks on a more equal playing field
with whites and diminish the structural impediments stemming from racial
stratification and discrimination. Unlike most settings, blacks in the
military are more well-represented at all levels of the professional
hierarchy (Lunquist 2004; Teachman and Tedrow 2008).
Empirical Evidence on Black Families in Canada
Questions about marriage and family structure among Canadian blacks
have not received the same amount of attention as in the United States.
To date, the demographic literature on black families in Canada is
limited to a handful of publications (Calliste 2001; Christensen and
Weinfeld 1993). There is certainly a rich and substantial tradition of
writing about black Canadians; yet, much of this work examines the
experiences of blacks as individuals or as a group. In spite of these
limitations, insights about black families can be gleaned from the
growing number of studies on sub-groups of the black population, namely
children, young adults, parents, men and women, and recent immigrants
(Henry 1994; Smith, Lalonde and Johnson 2004; Tettey and Puplampu 2005).
A consistent body of evidence has shown that black families and
children in Canada are more at risk than others of confronting
difficulties related to income inequality and poverty, immigration, and
racial discrimination (James, Este, Bernard, Benjamin, Lloyd and Turner
2010; Bernard and McAll 2008; Lavergne, Dufour, Sarmiento, and
DesCoteaux 2009). Recent studies of the 2001 and 2006 census data
indicate a possible reversal in these trends, particularly for the black
second-generation, which has now reached close to economic parity with
native whites (Attewell, Kasinitz and Dunn 2009; Mensah 2010). Recent
immigrant blacks in Canada face unique barriers due to a lack of
recognition of foreign credentials, language differences, refugee
status, and macro-economic forces such as labor market segmentation and
a widening gap between rich and poor (Mensah 2010; Opoku-Dapaah 2006;
Reitz 2007).
Previous Canadian studies have shown that the prevalence of
single-parent families is higher among blacks than other Canadians
(Christensen and Weinfeld 1993; Calliste 2001; Henry 1994). In a recent
report on the family structure of racial and ethnic groups in Canada,
Mata (2011) observed that the percentage of female single parents in
2006 was especially high among immigrant women of Somali and Caribbean
origin. These findings are noteworthy because Caribbean and Somali women
have often been compelled by law or circumstance to migrate to Canada
alone or as single mothers. Caribbean women arriving as migrant workers
in Canada, often (though not solely) in domestic work, have been legally
and often financially obligated to leave spouses and children behind in
the home country (Arat-Koc 2001). For Somali women, conditions prior to
their arrival in Canada often drove them to become single-parents:
either husbands lost their lives through war or the family was forced to
separate in the process of seeking asylum in Canada (Israelite et al.
1999; Spitzer 2006). Miraftab (2000) reports that close to
three-quarters of the 35 Somali families in his Vancouver study had
children or spouses who remained behind in Africa, leaving Somali
mothers as the "de facto" heads of household in Canada.
As we would expect given the above findings, fewer black men and
women are found in marital and common-law unions than other Canadians.
In addition, the risk of divorce and separation has been slightly higher
among blacks (Christensen and Weinfeld 1993). These racial differences
may vary as a function of social class. In one study on the 1991 census,
Calliste (2001) found that blacks with either a postsecondary education
or above average income were as likely as other Canadians to be married
and in a two-parent household.
One of the more important themes running through the literature on
blacks in Canada is the role of immigration and settlement in altering
the composition, welfare, and cohesion of black families. Scholars have
found that immigration often has a disruptive impact on families that is
compounded by factors like poverty, unemployment, racism, and cultural
and language differences (Click 2010; Howell 2006; James et al., 2010).
Henry (1994) and Donkor (2012) describe the experiences of Caribbean and
African couples whose marriages fell apart after immigrating to Canada,
because men and women had developed differing and conflicting views
about gender. As women gain increased access to economic opportunities
in Canada, the traditional division of labor and power in the household
is upset and gender roles must be re-negotiated, especially if women are
balancing responsibilities for household work, childcare, and paid
employment. This transformation in gender roles is not unique to black
families; indeed, immigrant men and women from a wide range of
backgrounds often struggle to conform to a new balance of gender
relations upon moving to Canada or elsewhere (Howell 2006).
In Christensen and Weinfeld (1993) one of the most striking
findings was the magnitude of the sex ratio imbalance between black men
and women. In 1986, there were 86 black men for every 100 black women in
Canada. For the Canadian population as a whole, the sex ratio was rather
predictable: 102 men for every 100 women. As Christensen and Weinfeld
(1993) suggested, the most likely cause of this imbalance is Canadian
immigration policy and its preference for female migrant workers from
the Caribbean. As early as the 1950s and 1960s, the federal government
began inviting thousands of Caribbean nurses and domestic workers to
migrate to work on temporary visas in Canada (Arat-Koc 2001; Calliste
2001). While the government eventually ended its recruitment of foreign
nurses, it has continued to operate a foreign domestic worker program,
today known as the "Live-In Caregiver Program" (Arat-Koc
2001). Consequently, the number of Caribbean female migrants continues
to outstrip the number of male migrants from the region. Darden (2006)
finds that from 1961 to 1996, the ratio of black female to male
immigrants from the Caribbean and Bermuda averaged at 128:100, thus
maintaining a large sex imbalance among Caribbean-born blacks (Darden
2006). As cited earlier, legal restrictions on the rights of live-in
caregivers in Canada have long forced Caribbean women to settle in the
country alone and without spouses and children. Many of these women
would sponsor children later on, creating lone-parent families. The
long-term separations of women from their spouses and children can also
weaken family bonds, leading to permanent ruptures in conjugal
relationships or an emotional distance between parents and their
children that can be hard to undo and overcome (Henry 1994; Lashley
2002; Smith et al. 2004).
Christensen and Weinfeld (1993) observed a similarly unequal sex
ratio for Filipino women and men, who have also been among the groups
migrating to Canada as temporary workers. Contrary to black women,
however, Filipino women were actually more likely than Filipino men to
be married in 1986. The authors proposed that one possible reason for
this discrepancy is the higher rate of racial exogamy among Filipino
women. Recent research confirms that racial inter-marriages are indeed
more common among Filipino women than black women. In one study, 28% of
Filipino women, versus 9% of Filipino men, were found in an interracial
union in 2006. For blacks, the gender differential was reversed: 20% of
black women, versus 30% of black men, were involved in an inter-racial
union (Milan, Maheu, and Chui 2010). In another recent study, Hamplova
and LeBourdais (2010) found the proportion of black men in Toronto and
Montreal in mixed unions was higher than black women by an average of
10%. Altogether, these findings indicate that the odds that black women
in Canada will find romantic partners are much lower in comparison with
black men. It is also safe to presume that immigration policy, an
ongoing sex ratio imbalance, and inter-racial mating patterns have all
played some role in creating more black lone-parent families.
METHODS
The methodology for this study is descriptive and exploratory. The
primary research questions are the following: What is the composition
and character of black families with children in Canada in 2006? Flow
have conditions for these families changed or evolved since 1986? How do
the economic circumstances of black families with children compare with
other Canadian families in the present-day? To address these questions,
a series of cross-tabulations was generated, starting with basic
background information on black Canadians, namely nativity, immigration,
and sex ratios. Then, a set of comparative tables was produced on black
families in 1986 and 2006. These tables explore the marital status,
household type, household income, and educational attainment of blacks
and the general population of Canadians in the two years under study. In
a departure from Christensen and Weinfeld (1993), the present paper
includes a new table on educational attainment in 1986 and 2006. The aim
is to provide some additional background information on blacks in Canada
and explore the role that social class might play in explaining racial
differences in family formation.
The tables and variables for 2006 have been reproduced in the exact
form in which they were displayed in Christensen and Weinfeld (1993).
The data on marital status and sex ratios have been calculated for
adults aged 25-44 years, because it is the cohort most likely to be
active in marriage and childbearing. The tables on family structure and
household income have been generated for households with children who
are 0-14 years of age, in order to focus on families with dependent
children. This sample includes families with same-sex couples, although
the percentage among black families remains fairly low (Torczyner 2010).
All of the tables for 2006 incorporate the sampling weights from
Statistics Canada.
The 2006 data are taken from the individuals' file of the
census "Public Use Micro-Data File" (PUMF), which comprises a
representative sample of Canadians, approximately 2.7% of the
population. Data for "blacks" as a group are derived from
information on the "visible minority" origins of Canadians.
For the first time in 1996, the census began asking respondents to
indicate to which "visible minority" group they belonged. In
2006, 2.5% of the Canadian population, or approximately 780,000 people,
identified themselves as "Black." Blacks constituted the third
largest group of visible minorities after the Chinese (3.9%) and South
Asians (4.0%). It is possible that some portion of the changes from 1986
to 2006 is due to differing definitions of "black" used as
sources for the data; in 1986 the category was "black ethnic
origin."
RESULTS
Place of Birth and Immigration
One of the most remarkable characteristics of the black population
in Canada is its internal diversity, which only continues to grow with
respect to birthplace, nationality, language, and generation status. As
Table 1 shows, 44 percent of blacks in 2006 were native-born, and this
percentage fluctuates slightly across the provinces. Roughly a third of
blacks were born in the Caribbean, while another 20% were born in
Africa. Only in the Maritimes do we find a majority of blacks who are
third generation or more. Everywhere else the population is made up
largely of first- and second-generation immigrants. The proportion of
second-generation black Canadians has increased measurably since 1986
and stood at 20.6% in 2006. Overall, Table 2 shows that Ontario and
Quebec are home to the highest numbers of blacks in Canada.
In the years following the liberalization of Canadian immigration
policies in the 1960s, Caribbeans constituted the leading group of black
immigrants. Starting in 2000, Africans would overtake Caribbeans, as
shown in Figure 1. Caribbeans comprised the largest group of black
immigrants from the period of the 1950s up to the year 2000. Between
2000 and 2006, 63% of black immigrants were African.
[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]
Sex Ratio
The sex ratio imbalance for blacks between the ages of 25-44 years
in 2006 remains as large as it was in 1986: in both periods, it was
equal to 86.8 males for every 100 females (see Table 3). When the data
are disaggregated by place of origin, the sex ratio imbalance becomes
even sharper for Caribbean-born blacks: among those aged 18 years and
over in 2006, there were 77.6 Caribbean-born men for every 100
Caribbean-born women (see Table 4). This imbalance bears a direct
relationship to historical and contemporary immigrant flows. Although
the data are not shown here, the census data indicate that during the
most recent period from 2000 to 2006, 55% of all Caribbean immigrants
were women. Unlike Caribbean immigrants, there is no sex ratio imbalance
for African-born blacks.
Marital Status
Findings from the 2006 census point to a substantial decline since
1986 in the proportion of black men and women aged 25-44 years who are
married or in common-law unions. The drop has been especially large for
native-born blacks, who are now more likely to be "never
married" than either married or common-law. As shown in Table 5,
the proportion of native-born black men who are married or common-law
declined from 62.8% in 1986 to 37.6% in 2006, a drop of 40.1%. For
native-born black women, the level has gone from 50.7% to 35.0%, a 31%
decline. The figures for 2006 are comparable to results from the
Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) (LeBrun and LeVeist 2013). In a
pooled analysis of CCSH data covering the period from 2003 to 2008,
LeBrun and LeVeist (2013) observed that 23.7% of all native-born blacks
aged 18 years and over were married, compared with 63.6% of white
Canadians. In addition, 68.3% of blacks in the sample were single and
never married, versus 23.3% of whites. The results of that study also
indicate that native-born black adults tend to be much younger than
average; roughly 87% are between 18 and 44 years of age, compared with
49% in the native white population. This large age gap between native
blacks and whites is likely one factor among others that explains the
disparities in rates of marriage and common-law unions.
The marital status of foreign-born blacks has also changed, though
to a lesser degree. In 1986, 71.2% of foreign-born black men were
married; by 2006, this percentage had fallen to 56.3%, a decline of 21%.
For foreign-born black women, the proportion of married and common-law
unions had decreased from 58.2% in 1986 to 48.5% in 2006, a drop of
16.7%. It should be noted that these figures comprise averages, which
conceal important age variations. Once black men and women reach beyond
30 years of age, the odds of marriage and co-habiting unions rise
substantially. At 40-44 years of age in 2006, 54.4% of native-born and
58% of foreign-born blacks were married or in common-law unions (data
not shown).
The changing shape of conjugal relations in the black population is
to some extent a reflection of broader Canadian trends. Over the course
of the last few decades, Canadians have been marrying less often or
postponing marriage until later in life. Despite some fluctuations, the
rate of divorce in Canada since the 1970s has remained high by historic
standards (Kerr, Moyser, and Beaujot 2006). Many young adults are also
opting for co-habitation or common-law relationships as a substitute for
or a prelude to marriage, especially in Quebec. From 1986 to 2006, the
percentage of all Canadian men who were married or in common-law
relationships fell from 72.9% to 64.9% in 2006, a drop of 11%. For
women, the decrease went from 75.5% in 1986 to 69.3% in 2006, a change
of 8%. Despite these broadly similar trends, the decrease in marriage
and common-law unions remains higher among blacks, especially the
native-born.
Due to the lack of available research, it is difficult to speculate
on what might be causing this accelerated decline in marriage and
common-law unions among native-born blacks. As already indicated, age
might be a factor, as native-born blacks in Canada are relatively young
compared to the norm. In analyses not shown here, it was found that the
pattern is concentrated among blacks of the second generation, who
represent 73.9% of all native-born blacks aged 25-44 years. Within the
second generation, 62.7% of black men and women aged 25-44 years in 2006
were "never married," compared with 42.6% of black men and
women belonging to the third-plus generation. Given that the black
second-generation in Canada has achieved close to economic parity with
whites, it would be hard to claim that the fall in marriage and
common-law unions reflects a process of downward mobility in social
class or a process of "segmented assimilation," as articulated
in the US literature (Boyd 2002).
Findings in Table 5 further illustrate that the number of blacks
who are divorced or separated has increased since 1986, especially among
foreign-born black women. In 1986, 8.2% of foreign-born black women were
divorced and 6.9% were separated; by 2006, these figures had risen to
9.3% and 10.4%, respectively. For foreign-born black men, the situation
has remained rather stable: from 1986 to 2006, the percentage of
foreign-born black men who were divorced or separated went from 9.5% to
9.1%. Unlike black women, Canadian women in general have experienced a
slight decline in rates of divorce and separation, from 4.5% in 1986 to
3.7% in 2006.
Household Type
The findings on family structure in Table 6 indicate that more
black children are growing up in lone-parent families today than in
1986. The increase has been especially large for native-born black
children, who constitute the majority of black children. Also of
interest is the increase in foreign-born children who are living with a
lone parent. It must be kept in mind that these figures do not convey
the actual percentage of black lone parents, but rather the percentage
of black children living in a lone parent home. In 2006, 26.6% of black
parents with children 0-14 years of age were lone parents, versus 10% of
all parents (data not shown).
In 1986, 30.2% of native-born black children resided in a
lone-parent household; in 2006, this figure was 42.5%, an increase of
41%. For foreign-born black children, the percentage has gone from 25.9%
in 1986 to 32.1% in 2006, an increase of 24%. Correspondingly, the
proportion of black children living in two-parent families fell more
sharply for the native-born. From 1986 to 2006, the percentage of
native-born black children living with two parents fell from 64% to
51.2%. For foreign-born black children, the drop has been much narrower,
from 68.1% to 64.2%.
The findings further show that single-parent families have become
more common for all Canadian children. In 1986, 11.3% of all Canadian
children were living with a lone parent. By 2006, this had risen to
16.6%, a 47% increase. Furthermore, the proportion of children residing
with two parents fell from 83.9% to 78.1%.
Before-Tax Household Income
Table 7 displays the before-tax household income of two-parent and
lone-parent families with children aged 0-14 years. Based on figures
from Statistics Canada (2013), the dollar amounts for 2006 have been
adjusted to account for inflation since 1986. The equivalent of one
hundred dollars in 1986 was $167.43 in 2006. In other words, an income
of $20,000 in 1986 was approximately equal to $33,480 in 2006. The
income categories for 1986 and 2006 remain rough approximations, because
the census does not permit calculations of actual incomes, only
averages. For example, the closest amount to $33,480 (the equivalent of
$20,000 in 1986) is a code for $30,000-34,999. Given these limitations,
the findings should be taken as an illustration of broad patterns and
fluctuations in income inequality over time, rather than precise
measures of income and poverty.
As a whole, the results show that the economic situation of black
families with children has worsened since 1986, while the situation has
improved for other Canadian families with children. A slightly higher
proportion of black children were living in a low-income household in
2006 than in 1986 (35.3% versus 33.3%). In contrast, the proportion of
all Canadian children residing in a low-income household fell over the
same period, from 22.4% in 1986 to 18.6% in 2006. In both periods, the
most significant factor associated with racial disparities in the
household income of families with young children is family structure. In
2006, however, significant racial gaps in income remain even when family
structure is taken into account.
As indicated earlier, black children in 1986 were marginally more
likely than other Canadian children to be living in a low-income
household when family structure was held constant. The percentage of
black children in a two-parent family earning less than $20,000 in 1986
was 17.9%, compared with 16% of all children in a two-parent family. In
2006, the proportion of black children from two-parent families living
in low-income households remained unchanged (17.8%); in contrast, fewer
children from two-parent families in the general population were found
in low-income households in 2006 (11.6%). A similar process of
increasing inequality has occurred among lone-parent families. In 1986,
70.2% of black children in single-parent families, and 67.7% of all
Canadian children in single-parent families, were found in households
earning less than $20,000. In 2006, the percentage would fall to 56.4%
for black children and 49.5% for all children in the country. This
represents a decline of 19.7% in the proportion of black children
lone-parent families, versus a decline of 26.8% for other children in
the same group. Evidently, economic prospects have improved for all
children in lone-parent families, though to a lesser degree for black
children. Two trends can be discerned from these findings: on the one
hand, black families have made some appreciable economic gains since
1986; at the same time, they have fallen further behind other Canadian
families, whether they are lone-parent or two-parent families.
The data confirm that the incidence of low-income households was
comparatively higher for black children in 2006, and this is true
whether they belonged to a lone-parent or two-parent family. While
controlling for family structure diminishes the size of racial income
inequalities, it does not eliminate them. To fully account for this
rising inequality between black families and other Canadian families in
2006, we need to turn to alternative explanations. Potential causal
factors to consider would be racial discrimination in the labor market
and barriers to immigrant integration (Mensah 2010).
Educational Attainment
The final comparative table (Table 8) displays the educational
attainment of blacks and other Canadians in 1986 and 2006. On the whole,
educational levels have increased for all Canadians since 1986,
including blacks. On this score, blacks have clearly not lost ground
relative to other Canadians. One finding is worthy of note. Black women,
like all Canadian women, report higher levels of university completion
than males of the same group. In 2006, 29.7% of native-born black women,
versus 20.5% of native-born black men, had acquired a Bachelor's
degree or higher. The same gender gap exists in the general Canadian
population, although it is somewhat narrower. In 2006, 29.4% of all
women and 24.9% of all men had obtained a Bachelor's degree or
higher.
These findings corroborate what other researchers have found using
earlier versions of the census. In one study, Simmons and Plaza (1998)
observed that native-born black women aged 20-24 years in Toronto had
rates of university completion in 1991 that were much higher than
native-born black men as well as foreign-born black women.
In 1986, the pattern was for black men to have higher levels of
education than black women, whether they were foreign- or native-born.
Today, foreign-born black women are nearly as likely as foreign-born
black men to have a Bachelor's degree or higher. Native-born black
women have now surpassed their black male peers. These findings are
consistent with patterns in the US, which previous authors have claimed
inhibit the formation of black heterosexual unions (Clarke 2011). For
all couples, marital homogamy tends to be the norm, and blacks are no
exception (Schoen and Weinick 1993). It would be worth exploring in
future research whether gender differentials in education between
native-born black men and women in Canada may have (or will) become an
impediment to marriage and co-habitation for educated black women. This
is in addition to the difficulties that black men and women with low
education and income often experience in forming and sustaining families
(Henry 1994).
CONCLUSION
The major conclusion of the present exploratory study is that since
1986, the socioeconomic status of most black families with children has
deteriorated relative to others. Undeniably, black families in Canada
face a more challenging set of social and economic circumstances than
other families, and these factors can only undermine their welfare and
stability. In 2006, significantly fewer blacks than other Canadians aged
25-44 years were married or in a common-law union, more black women than
men were divorced or separated, and larger proportions of native-born
blacks remained single and never married. The economic gap between black
households with children and other Canadian households with children
grew from 1986 to 2006, even when family structure is controlled. Many
factors that militate against the formation and stability of unions may
be at work: labour market inequalities; the pressures of racism; poverty
and economic insecurity; immigrant stresses that lead to marital
dissolution; the unequal sex ratio and inter-racial marriage patterns.
Consequently, more black children find themselves in lone-parent
families, which, when combined with poverty, can create challenges for
these children as they grow up. The diminishing prospects of recent
immigrants in Canada may partly account for this lag in the income of
black families. Picot and Hou (2003) found that low-income rates have
been steadily rising for recent immigrants since the 1970s, even for the
most highly educated from regions such as Asia and Africa. The authors
also note that while poverty rates have dropped for the native-born,
they have increased for immigrants.
The one variable on which blacks fare similarly with other
Canadians is education. The question remains why education, as a proxy
for social class, does not protect blacks from economic poverty or
enhance their chances of forming marital or non-marital unions. The
present study has highlighted a gender gap in education between
native-born black women and men. As indicated, marital homogamy might
pose one obstacle to the formation of black heterosexual unions.
The sex ratio for blacks reveals an excess of black women, caused
largely by immigration policy. This fact, combined with the greater
racial exogamy of black men, reduces the odds of marriage for black
women. If these trends continue, the proportions of unmarried blacks and
lone-parent black women will continue to be above average.
The racial disparities in marriage and family structure found in
the present study bear some similarities with the US. In the US we know
that blacks are among the groups most affected by social and economic
barriers. An interesting question to consider is whether families in
Canada and the US are subject to processes of racial stratification and
racism that are broadly similar. This issue is undoubtedly complex given
the obvious differences noted earlier between blacks in the US and
Canada; nevertheless, the significant racial disparities in family
formation in the two countries raise the possibility that some
combinations of factors may be the same, namely between race, class, and
gender.
Contextual factors unique to Canada also play an important role in
explaining the conditions of black families in 2006, as indicated by the
age structure of the black population, the sex ratio imbalance among the
Caribbean-born, the employment barriers facing recent immigrants, and
the relation between gender, racial exogamy, and union formation.
Further detailed comparisons between immigrant and native black families
and between black families and other racial minority and immigrant
families in Canada would be pertinent and instructive.
Future research on black families should explore the short- and
long-term consequences of lone-parent families and poverty for parents
and their children. Another issue worth exploring is the within-group
variability between black families, taking into account factors like
education, generation status, birthplace, immigration history, gender,
language, and geographic location. As shown earlier, the black
population is currently more diverse than ever, with a now sizable
proportion of African immigrants, a still large number of Caribbean-born
immigrants, and a growing percentage of native-born blacks, especially
of the second generation.
Finally, policies that seek to reduce sex ratio imbalances driven
by immigration, eliminate income gaps for black men and women in the
labor force, expand services for single parents and low-income families
to meet their basic needs, and enable immigrants to find jobs
commensurate with their skills and education would go some way to
ensuring more favorable conditions for black families and their
children.
REFERENCES
Allen, W.R. 1979. Class, culture, and family organization: The
effects of class and race on family structure in urban America. Journal
of Comparative Family Studies 10.3: 301-313.
Angel, R., and M. Tienda. 1982. Determinants of extended household
structure: Cultural pattern or economic need? American Journal of
Sociology 87.6: 1360-1383.
Arat-Koc, S. 2001. The politics of family and immigration in the
subordination of domestic workers in Canada. In Family patterns, gender
relations, ed. B.J. Fox, 428-452. Toronto: Oxford University Press.
Attewell, P., P. Kasinitz, and K. Dunn. 2009. Black Canadians and
black Americans: racial income inequality in comparative perspective.
Ethnic and Racial Studies 33.3: 473-495.
Barrow, C. 2001. Contesting rhetoric of "black family
breakdown" in Barbados. Journal of Comparative Family Studies 32.3:
419-441.
Bernard, L. et C. McAll. 2008. A la porte du systeme penal : La
surrepresentation des jeunes Noirs montrealais. Revue du CREMIS 1.3 :
15-21.
Blackwood, E. 2005. Wedding bell blues: Marriage, missing men, and
matrifocal follies. American Ethnologist 32.1: 3-19.
Blum, H.M., M.H. Boyle, and D. Offord. 1988. Single-parent
families: Child psychiatric disorder and school performance. Journal of
the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 27.2: 214219.
Boyd, M. 2002. Educational attainments of immigrant offspring:
Success or segmented assimilation? International Migration Review 36.4:
1037-1092.
Bulcroft, R.A., and K.A. Bulcroft. 1993. Race differences in
attitudinal and motivational factors in the decision to marry. Journal
of Marriage and the Family 55.2: 338-355.
Calliste, A. 2001. Black families in Canada: Exploring the
interconnections of race, class and gender. In Family Patterns, Gender
Relations, ed. B.). Fox, 401-419. Toronto: Oxford University Press.
Carlson, M.J., and P. England. 2011. Social class and family
patterns in the United States. In Social Class and Changing Families in
an Unequal America, ed. M.C. Carlson and P. England, 1-20. Stanford:
Stanford University Press.
Cherlin, A.J. 1998. Marriage and marital dissolution among black
Americans. Journal of Comparative Family Studies 29.2: 147-158.
--. 2009. The Marriage Go-Around: The State of Marriage and the
Family in America Today. New York, NY: Vintage.
Christensen, C.P., and M. Weinfeld. 1993. The black family in
Canada: A preliminary exploration of family patterns and inequality
Canadian Ethnic Studies/Etudes ethniques au Canada 25.3: 26-45.
Clarke, A.Y. 2011. Inequalities of Love: College Educated Black
Women and the Barriers to Romance and Family. Durham: Duke University
Press.
Clark-Nicolas, P., and B. Gray-Little. 1991. Effect of economic
resources on marital quality in black married couples. Journal of
Marriage and the Family 53.3: 645-655.
Darden, J.T. 2006. The impact of Canadian immigration policy on the
structure of the Black Caribbean family in Toronto. In Inside the
Mosaic, ed. E. Fong, 146-168. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Dilworth-Anderson, P., L.M. Burton, and L. Boulin Johnson. 1993.
Reframing theories for understanding race, ethnicity and families. In
Sourcebook of Family Theories and Methods: A Contextual Approach, ed. P.
Boss, W.J. Doherty, R. La Rousse, W.R. Schumm, and S.K. Steinmetz,
627-649. New York: Springer.
Donkor, M. 2012. "I'm divorcing because I drank Lake
Ontario": Marital breakdown in Ghanaian immigrant families in
Toronto. Southern Journal of Canadian Studies 5.1-2: 241-254.
Dreher, M.,and R. Hudgins. 2010. Maternal conjugal multiplicity and
child development in rural Jamaica. Family Relations 59.5: 495-505.
Du Bois, W.E.B. 1908. The Negro American family. Atlanta: Atlanta
University Press.
Edin, K., and M. Kefalas. 2005. Promises I Can Keep: Why Poor Women
Put Motherhood before Marriage. Berkeley: University of California
Press.
Fosset, M.A., and K.J. Kiecolt. 1991. A methodological review of
the sex ratio: Alternatives for comparative research. Journal of
Marriage and the Family 53.4: 941-957.
Frazier, E.F. 1939. The Negro Family in the United States. Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.
Furstenberg, F.F. 2009. If Moynihan had only known: Race, class and
family change in the twentieth-century. Annals of the American Academy
of Political and Social Science 621.1: 94-110.
Gibson-Davis, C.M., K. Edin, and S. McLanahan. 2005. High hopes but
even higher expectations: The retreat from marriage among low-income
couples. Journal of Marriage and the Family 67.5: 13011312.
Click, J. E. 2010. Connecting complex processes: A decade of
research on immigrant families. Journal of Marriage and Family 72.3:
498-515.
Goulbourne, H., and M. Chamberlain. 2001. Caribbean families in
Britain and the Trans-Atlantic world. London and Oxford: MacMillan
Education Ltd.
Hamplova, D., and C. Le Bourdais. 2010. Visible minorities and
"White-non-White" conjugal unions in Canadian large cities.
Ethnic and Racial Studies 33.9: 1537-1560.
Henry, F. 1994. The Caribbean Diaspora in Toronto: Learning to Live
with Racism. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Herskovits, M.J. 1958. The Myth of the Negro Past. Boston: Beacon
Press.
Hill, S.A. 2009. Why won't African-Americans get (and stay)
married? Why should they? In Marriage and Family: Perspectives and
Complexities, ed. E. Peters and C.M. Kamp Dush, 73-86. New York:
Columbia University Press.
Howell, N. 2006. "Getting the message": Effects of
Canadian law and social policy on families that immigrate to Toronto. In
Inside the Mosaic, ed. E. Fong, 121-145. Toronto: University of Toronto
Press.
Hummer, R.A., and E.R. Hamilton. 2010. Race and ethnicity in
fragile families. Future of Children 20.2: 113-131.
Israelite, N.K, A. Herman, and F.A. Alim. 1999. Working for
"Sharciga": Resettlement and the roles of Somali women.
Canadian Woman Studies 19.3: 80-86.
James, C., D. Este, W. Thomas Bernard, A. Benjamin, B. Lloyd, and
T. Turner. 2010. Race and well-being: The Lives, Hopes, and Activism of
African Canadians. Halifax: Fernwood Publishing.
Kane, E.W. 2000. Racial and ethnic variations in gender-related
attitudes. Annual Review of Sociology 26: 419-439.
Kerr, D., M. Moyser, and R. Beaujot. 2006. Marriage and
co-habitation: Demographic and socio-economic differences in Quebec and
Canada. Canadian Studies in Population 33.1: 83-117.
Lashley, M. 2002. The unrecognized social stressors of migration
and reunification in Caribbean families. Transcultural Psychiatry 37.2:
203-217.
Lavergne, C., S. Dufour, J. Sarmiento, et M.E. DesCoteaux. 2009. La
reponse du systeme de protection de la jeunesse montrealais aux enfants
issus des minorites visibles. Revue Intervention 131 : 233-241.
Lebrun, L.A., and T. A. LeVeist. 2013. Health status among black
Canadians: Results from a national survey. Canadian Ethnic Studies 45.1
2: 143-155.
Lichter, D.T., D.K. McLaughlin, G. Kephart, and D. Landry. 1992.
Race and the retreat from marriage: A shortage of marriageable men?
American Sociological Review 57.6: 781-799.
Lopoo, L.M., and T. DeLeire. 2014. Family structure and the
economic well-being of children in youth and adulthood. Social Science
Research 43.1: 30-44.
Lundquist, J.H. 2004. When race makes no difference: Marriage and
the military. Social Forces 83.2: 731-757.
Mata, F. 2011. Lone-parent status among ethnic groups in Canada:
Data explorations on its prevalence, composition and generational
persistence aspects. Vancouver: Metropolis British Columbia, Centre of
Excellence for Research on Immigration and Diversity.
McLanahan, S., and C. Percheski. 2008. Family structure and the
reproduction of inequalities. Annual Review of Sociology 34: 257-276.
Mensah, J. 2010. Black Canadians: History, Experiences, Social
Conditions. Halifax: Fenwood Publishing.
Milan, A., H. Maheux, and T. Chui. 2010. A portrait of couples in
mixed unions. Canadian Social Trends 89: 70-80.
Mintz, S.W., and R. Price. 1976. The Birth of African-American
Culture: An Anthropological Perspective. Boston: Beacon Press.
Miraftab, F. 2000. Sheltering refugees: The housing experience of
refugees in metropolitan Vancouver. Canadian Journal of Urban Research
9.1: 42-57.
Moynihan, D.P. 1967. The negro family: The case for national
action. In The Moynihan Report and the Politics of Controversy, ed. L.
Rainwater and W.L. Rainwater, 39-124. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Oliver, M.L., and T.M. Shapiro. 2006. Black Wealth, White Wealth: A
New Perspective on Racial Inequality. New York: Routledge.
Opoku-Dapaah, E. 2006. African immigrants in Canada: Trends,
socio-demographic and spatial aspects. In The African Diaspora in
Canada: Negotiating Identity and Belonging, ed. W.J. Tettey and K.P.
Puplampu, 69-93. Calgary: University of Calgary Press.
Owusu-Bempah, A., and S. Wortley. 2014. Race, Crime, and Criminal
Justice in Canada. In The Oxford Handbook on Race, Ethnicity, Crime, and
Immigration, ed. S. Bucerius and M. Tonry, 281-320. New York: Oxford
University Press.
Pendakur, Krishna, and Ravi Pendakur. 2002. Colour my world: Has
the minority-majority earnings gap changed over time? Canadian Public
Policy 28.4: 489-512.
--. 2011. Colour by numbers: Minority earnings in Canada 1996-2005.
Journal of International Migration and Integration 12.3: 305-329.
Picot, G., and F. Hou. 2003. The Rise in Low-Income Rates among
Immigrants in Canada (Research Paper). Ottawa: Statistics Canada.
Raley, R.K., and M.M. Sweeney. 2009. Explaining race and ethnic
variation in marriage: Directions for future research. Race and Social
Problems 1.3: 132-142.
Reitz, J.G. 2007. Immigrant employment success in Canada, Part II:
Understanding the decline. International Migration and Integration 8.1:
37-62.
Ruggles, S. 1994. The origins of African-American family structure.
American Sociological Review 59.1 : 136-151.
Safa, H. 2005. The matrifocal family and patriarchal ideology in
Cuba and the Caribbean. Journal of Latin American and Caribbean
Anthropology 10.2: 314-338.
Sapers, H. 2013. Annual report of the office of the Correctional
Investigator (2012-2013). Ottawa: Office of the Correctional
Investigator, Government of Canada.
Schoen, R., and R.M. Weinick. 1993. Partner choice in marriages and
co-habitation. Journal of Marriage and the Family 55.2: 408-414.
Simmons, A.B., and D.E. Plaza. 1998. Breaking through the glass
ceiling: The pursuit of university training among African-Caribbean
migrants and their children in Toronto. Canadian Ethnic Studies 30.3:
99-119.
Skuterud, M. 2010. The visible minority earnings gap across
generations of Canadians. Canadian Journal of Economics 43.3: 860-881.
Smith, A., R.N. Lalonde, and S. Johnson. 2004. Serial migration and
its implications for the parent-child relationship: A retrospective
analysis of the experiences of the children of Caribbean immigrants.
Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology 10.2: 107-122.
Spitzer, D.L. 2006. The impact of policy on Somali refugee women in
Canada. Refuge 23.2: 47-54.
Statistics Canada. 2013. Consumer Price Index,
http://www.statcan.gc.ca/tables tableaux/sum-som/101/
cst01/econ46a-eng.htm.
Stevenson, B.E. 1995. Black family structure in colonial and
antebellum Virginia: Amending the revisionist perspective. In The
decline in marriage among African-Americans: Causes, consequences, and
policy implications, ed. M.B. Tucker and C. Mitchell-Kernan, 27-56. New
York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Sudarkasa, N. 1981. Interpreting the African heritage in
Afro-American family organization. In Black Families, ed. H.P. McAdoo,
37-53. Beverly Hills: Sage.
--. 1998. Interpreting the African heritage in Afro-American family
organization. In Families in the
US: Kinship and domestic politics, ed. K.V. Hansen and A.I. Garey,
91-104. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Sweeney, M.M., and J.A. Phillips. 2004. Understanding racial
differences in marital disruption: Recent trends and explanations.
Journal of Marriage and Family 66.3: 639-650.
Teachman, J.D., and L. Tedrow. 2008. Divorce, race, and military
service: More than equal pay and equal opportunity. Journal of Marriage
and the Family 70.4: 1030-1044.
Tettey, W.J., and K.P. Puplampu. 2005. The African Diaspora in
Canada: Negotiating Identity and Belonging. Calgary: University of
Calgary Press.
Torczyner, J. 2010. Demographic challenges facing the black
community of Montreal in the 21st century.
Montreal: McGill Consortium for Human Rights Advocacy Training,
McGill University.
United States Census Bureau. 2011. Census data file,
http://www.census.gov/population/race/data/black.html.
White, L, and S.J. Rogers. 2000. Economic circumstances and family
outcomes: A review of the 1990s. Journal of Marriage and the Family
62.4: 1035-1051.
Wilson, W.J. 1997. When Work Disappears: The World of the New Urban
Poor. New York: Random House. Winks, R.W. 1971. The Blacks in Canada: a
history. Montreal: Queen's University Press.
Worswick, C. 1996. Immigrant families in the Canadian labour
market. Canadian Public Policy 22.4: 378-396.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We are grateful to Dr. Andrew Cherlin, Benjamin H. Griswold III
Professor of Public Policy, Johns Hopkins University, for his vital
feedback on the analysis for this paper. We also wish to thank the two
anonymous reviewers for their helpful feedback on the paper.
ANNE-MARIE LIVINGSTONE is a PhD Candidate in the Department of
Sociology at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, Maryland. Prior to
entering the PhD program, she was the Evaluation Coordinator for the
Community Learning Centres of the Quebec Ministry of Education, Sports,
and Leisure. Her research focuses on issues of race and ethnicity,
poverty and inequality, and public policy.
MORTON WEINFELD is Professor of Sociology at McGill University,
where he holds the Chair in Canadian Ethnic Studies. He is the author of
Like everyone else but different: The paradoxical success of Canadian
Jews (McClelland and Stewart, 2001) and co-edited, with Harold Troper,
Ethnicity, Politics, and Public Policy: Case Studies in Canadian
Diversity (University of Toronto Press, 1999). His article
"Canadian Jews, Dual Loyalty, and the Tebbit "Cricket
Test," appeared in Canadian Ethnic Studies in vol. 43-44, 3-1,
2011-2012.
TABLE 1. Place of birth of blacks, 2006
Place of birth % Total
Canada 44.3 343,606
Caribbean 30.5 237,098
Africa 19.7 153,195
Latin America 2.1 16,537
Other 3.4 25,785
Total 100% 776,221
TABLE 2. Nativity and immigrant status of blacks by province, 2006
Province/region Native-born Foreign-born Total N
Maritimes 86.3 13.7 100% 24,638
Quebec 40.0 60.0 100% 189,264
Ontario 44.0 56.0 100% 470,682
Prairie provinces 41.2 58.8 100% 65,443
British Columbia 48.6 51.4 100% 28,079
NWT 25.0 75.0 100% 444
Total 44.3 55.7 100% 778,551
TABLE 3. Sex ratio of Canadians by age
1986
Other
visible All
Age group Blacks minorities Canadians
0-14 103.0 105.1 104.9
15-24 86.9 100.1 102.2
25-44 86.8 95.6 98.8
45 and over 76.0 89.3 88.0
2006
Other
visible All
Age group Blacks minorities Canadians
0-14 106.6 105.1 105.3
15-24 103.3 103.7 103.7
25-44 86.8 89.0 95.7
45 and over 84.8 90.5 90.8
TABLE 4. Sex ratio of blacks by place of birth (all adults 18 years
of age and over), 2006
Place of birth Male/Female N
Canada 96.5 127,076
Caribbean 77.6 224,335
Africa 100.4 128,001
Latin America 80.2 15,723
Other 105.8 18,941
Total 88.7 514,076
TABLE 5. Marital status of adults aged 25-44 years, by gender and
place of birth
1986
Black Black
native-born foreign-born All Canadian
Sex M F M F M F
Divorced 4.7 7.0 4.2 8.2 3.4 5.4
Married or 62.8 50.7 71.2 58.2 72.9 75.5
common-law
Separated 5.7 7.9 5.0 6.9 3.0 4.1
Never 26.7 34.3 19.5 25.9 20.5 14.2
married
Widowed 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.8 0.2
Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
2006
Black Black
native-born foreign-born All Canadian
Sex M F M F M F
Divorced 1.2 3.9 4.4 9.3 2.9 4.5
Married or 37.6 35.0 56.3 48.5 64.9 69.3
common-law
Separated 2.1 4.8 4.7 10.4 2.3 3.7
Never 59.1 56.1 34.4 30.5 29.8 22.1
married
Widowed 0.0 0.2 0.2 1.3 0.1 0.5
Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
TABLE 6. Household type of children aged 0-14 years, by place of
birth
1986
Black Black All
native-born foreign-born Canadian
Two-parent 64.0 68.1 83.9
Lone-parent 30.2 25.9 11.3
Other 16.0 17.7 10.5
Total 100% 100% 100%
2006
Black Black All
native-born foreign-born Canadian
Two-parent 51.2 64.2 78.1
Lone-parent 42.5 32.1 16.6
Other 6.3 3.7 5.3
Total 100% 100% 100%
TABLE 7. Before-tax income of the households of children 0-14 years
of age
Black Black All black
two-parent lone-parent children
1986
Less than $19,999 17.9 70.2 33.3
$20-39,999 41.6 24.2 35.1
$40-74,999 36.0 5.4 27.9
$75,000 and over 4.4 0.2 3.6
Total 100% 100% 100%
2006
Less than $34,999 17.8 56.4 35.3
$35-64,999 35.7 29.3 32.8
$65-124,999 36.6 11.7 25.3
$125,000 and over 10.0 2.7 6.7
Total 100% 100% 100%
All Canadian All Canadian All Canadian
two-parent lone-parent children
1986
Less than $19,999 16.0 67.7 22.4
$20-39,999 41.3 24.4 38.3
$40-74,999 36.9 7.0 33.5
$75,000 and over 5.9 0.9 5.8
Total 100% 100% 100%
2006
Less than $34,999 11.6 49.5 18.6
$35-64,999 27.8 31.1 28.4
$65-124,999 43.1 16.0 38.0
$125,000 and over 17.6 3.4 15.0
Total 100% 100% 100%
TABLE 8. Educational attainment of adults 25-44 years of age
1986
Black Black
native-born foreign-born All Canadian
Sex M F M F M F
No high 44.7 35.8 31.6 31.8 32.9 34.1
school
High 19.5 27.4 17.4 19.0 20.0 24.7
school
College or 21.6 26.8 35.1 41.0 30.0 28.1
some
university
Bachelor's 14.2 10.0 16.0 8.2 17.0 13.2
or higher
Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
2006
Black Black
native-born foreign-born All Canadian
Sex M F M F M F
No high 14.3 6.5 10.6 10.8 12.7 9.4
school
High 39.3 29.6 40.5 35.4 38.1 30.7
school
College or 26.0 34.1 27.6 34.5 24.2 30.6
some
university
Bachelor's 20.5 29.7 21.4 19.3 24.9 29.4
or higher
Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%