False Expectations: Politics and the Pursuit of the Saskatchewan Myth.
Walby, Kevin
False Expectations: Politics and the Pursuit of the Saskatchewan
Myth. Dale Eisler. Regina: CPRC Press, 2006. $24.95 sc. 251 pp.
False Expectations centers around an idea of the Saskatchewan myth:
that Saskatchewan is a bountiful land where success can be achieved. For
Eisler (p. xi), "this belief in a greater future is at the core of
Saskatchewan identity." The argument is that the myth can never be
actualized. Saskatchewan is no El Dorado, though it often has been
depicted as a lucrative promised land in national and provincial
propaganda. This book will interest lay and scholarly readers concerned
with Saskatchewan's place in Canada's history.
Eisler's lucid history traces key events related to
Saskatchewan's political and economic history. Early surveyors like
John Palliser in the late 1850s declared the mid-west a desert unfit for
"civilized man." In the 1870s, John Macoun described the
prairies as a fertile region that could sustain large populations.
Immigration advertisements in Europe claimed the prairies could support
50 million people. However, western settlers were kept as an economic
colony of central Canada through various federal governments'
commitment to high tariffs. Eisler writes that "the farm economy
would create the wealth that would be cycled from abroad into the
tariff-protected manufacturing economy of central Canada" (p. 27).
Highly fluctuating incomes of agriculture settlements made the elevated
charges of farming difficult to shoulder. The Seed Grain Act of 1908 and
the Hail Insurance Act of 1912 sought to provide farmers some protection
from crop failure and damage. Groups like the Saskatchewan Agriculture
Credit Commission believed co-operation should be the guiding principle
of the Saskatchewan farm economy. Growing connections between farming
and labour politics allowed for the creation of the Co-operative
Commonwealth Federation (CCF) and the writing of the Regina Manifesto.
Eisler chronicles Tommy Douglas' Fabian leadership of the CCF
through the 1940s and 1950s, the creation of the initial Crown
Corporations, the development of a public health-care system, and the
move toward developing a natural resource sector with the rise to power
of Ross Thatcher's Liberals.
Though Eisler does a decent job of substantiating his claims
throughout False Expectations, it must be asked what a focus on such a
spatialization of politics (e.g., "the province") truncates
from a history of the region. A strong focus on the Saskatchewan myth
glosses over local forms of contestation based on urban place
attachment. For instance, Eisler argues im/migration policy was focussed
around settling the grain belt and making it productive. While this is
valid, the Temperance Movement was also a major factor that influenced
migration eastward from Ontario cities. The Temperance Colonization
Society (TCS) wanted to build a western utopia free from eastern vices,
and was a fundamental influence shaping the character of many towns and
cities. The streets of Saskatoon, for example, were laid out by the TCS.
A significant regulatory agent in turn-of-the-twentieth-century
Saskatoon, the TCS even influenced where ferry and commercial services
were located.
Ethnic antagonism was also articulated on a more local than
provincial level. Business owners and residents in Saskatoon's late
1920s "Chinatown" were displaced from "the east" to
"the west" side to make room for a hockey rink and a Legion
building. This "east/west" division in Saskatoon was marked by
Temperance Street, with colonies and town formations on the west
adhering to temperance rules. My point is that every town and city in
Saskatchewan today has been configured through such historical, local
moments of emergence. The urban imaginary resonates with people as much
or more than any imaginary of the nation or the province. Since urban
imaginaries are absent from Eisler's analysis, the author does
little to move the discipline of political economy away from
state-centric assumptions of sovereigntist politics and toward thinking
about movements and municipalities.
More critical questions can be asked of False Expectations
regarding the relationship between colonialism and the Saskatchewan
myth. Eisler does well to discuss the policies of early federal
governments regarding the attempted assimilation of Canada's
Aboriginal peoples. He also discusses the disturbing eugenicist tendencies of Douglas' thought, and the absence of consideration of
Aboriginal peoples' wellbeing in CCF and NDP policy. But how did it
come to be that surveys of the prairies were carried out, that the land
was "settled"? There is no discussion of the historical
marginalization of Aboriginal peoples on the prairies. False
Expectations begins with the National Policy on populating the west, but
this ignores prior colonial relations. The idea of terra
nullius--meaning "empty land"--was not only fundamental to the
colonization of the New World by the Old World. Historically, it was
also fundamental to the colonization of the prairies by Central Canada.
Eisler does not expand upon the idea of terra nullius as a major aspect
of the Saskatchewan myth. This is unfortunate, since it eschews a
critical history of the events that allowed for the settling of
Saskatchewan and, ultimately, the Saskatchewan myth itself, to be
intelligible.
Kevin Walby; kwalby@connect.carleton.ca
Department of Sociology and Anthropology; Carleton University