Good-bye Marianne. (Recensions).
Kertzer, Adrienne
Good-bye Marianne. Irene N. Watts. McClelland and Stewart Young
Readers. Toronto: Tundra Books, 1998.112 pp. $8.99 pb. The Children of
China: An Artist's Journey. Song Nan Zhang. McClelland and Stewart
Young Readers. Toronto: Tundra Books, 1998.32 pp. $9.99 pb.
The question of how to present history to children is foremost in
two recent and very different publications from Tundra. Irene N.
Watts's Good-bye Marianne uses fiction to present what the cover
informs us is "A Story of Growing up in Nazi Germany." In
truth, the temporal focus is narrower as Watts narrates how her eleven
year old protagonist, Marianne Kohn, moves in a two week period from
being a child whose greatest worry is a math test to a child travelling
alone on a train to England. For Marianne never takes the math test
scheduled for November 15, 1938; that very day, Jewish children are
barred from attending German schools. Only Marianne's good luck
(and the bad luck of someone else) ensures her place on the first of the
Kindertransportes that ultimately rescued 10,000 children from Nazi
Germany. This numerical information is included as the penultimate sentence in the brief Afterword. The succeeding sentence states the
other numbing numerical fact that children's writers on the
Holocaust always repea t as though repetition could make sense of the
number: "The Nazis murdered one and one-half million children under
the age of fifteen." How do we tell children (Tundra suggests the
book is appropriate for ages 9-12) stories about such facts?
The extent to which Watts bases the novel on her own experience is
unclear. We are told that she too lived at Richard Wagnerstrasse 3, the
same address she gives to Marianne, and that she too was sent to England
on another Kindertransport. But Watts (Irene Kirstein) was then only
seven and one-half. A protagonist of that age, we assume, would not be
able to ask the kind of questions and teach the kind of lessons we hope
that older children will learn from historical fiction, and so Watts
must make her heroine four years older. Yet it is significant that
Marianne is asked on the train to take care of a vulnerable seven year
old girl holding a doll. Immediately after the unnamed mother leaves the
younger child with Marianne and "move[s] away without looking
back," Marianne promises herself to never talk about this
unbelievable day and occupies herself by taking care of the child. By
distancing her story from that of her seven year old self, by talking
about someone older, someone with some control (Marianne eve n manages
to trick the Gestapo at one point, and evinces an eleven year old flair
for mocking Hitler) Watts obviously achieves the control she needs to
write about this still traumatic event. Is Marianne the older child she
wishes she had been, a fictional tribute to a real child who did take
care of her, or an imaginary portrait of the child she wishes had taken
care of her? Such questions are not trivial, but speak to the way
Holocaust memories recast as children's fiction negotiate the
tensions between telling children historical truth and making that truth
bearable.
Children's fiction on the Holocaust also recognizes that there
are limits to what an eleven year old can understand, limits that
Good-bye Marianne does not cross. As Watts provides the historical facts
that record the events leading to Marianne's departure from Berlin,
she reinforces those limits by having the mother repeatedly plead with
her daughter to accept what seems beyond understanding: a father in
hiding since his release from a concentration camp; a mother willing to
send her daughter away. And Marianne faces other facts she cannot
comprehend: a friend who longs to join the Hitler Youth; a nation that
refuses to regard her as she regards herself, as more authentically
German than the Austrian Hitler. With a "list of forbidden
activities ... piling up like the compost heap," Marianne
experiences the multiple and increasing signs of discrimination and
humiliation, and for the reader's benefit, recalls still others.
But Marianne reaches a point where she can no longer interpret events
for her reader; th is limit is reached when she and her mother arrive at
the Berlin railway station: "Immediately they were assaulted by
sights and sounds of such confusion, noise, and terror that
Marianne's questions were left unspoken."
A child reader truly ignorant of Nazi Germany might be puzzled by
the paragraph that follows. Surely it is the historical knowledge of
what comes later, the subject that Watts does not write about, that
informs the terror of Marianne's unspoken questions as she sees
"seemingly endless railway tracks, which Marianne knew sent trains
all over Europe" and the presence of SS guards with
"powerfully muscled watchdogs." What the reader is given is a
fairly safe escape story in which the Holocaust is not yet known,
Marianne's impassioned speech about Nazi persecution does make a
difference upon her Hitler Youth-loving friend, and Marianne is herself
never abused by the Gestapo. Thus the book can end with ambiguous hope:
"The ship sailed on, into the darkness, into safety, into the
future," the fate of Marianne's parents unknown (although the
letter the mother hides contains sufficient hints that the mother knows
she will likely never see her daughter again). Twice in the letter the
mother expresses the hope that one day her daughter will understand why
a mother would willingly send her own daughter away. By writing Good-bye
Marianne, Watts implies that this difficult maternal decision is one
that she has come to understand.
A different and far less challenging understanding of mothers,
children, and the telling of history is provided by Song Nan
Zhang's The Children of China: An Artist's Journey. The author
of A Little Tiger in the Chinese Night, an eloquent depiction of
Zhang's political response to the massacre in Tienanmen Square, now
continues his autobiography in art by telling children about the people
he paints, people he could only travel to see after the end of the
Cultural Revolution. Zhang explains that the nomadic people of China
appear so ''colorful,''
''romantic,'' and ''happy'' in
these paintings because after the ten years of the Cultural Revolution,
this is exactly how he saw them: "To me, they represented freedom
in a country without freedom, the right to live one's own way, to
dress, work, worship and bring up children according to ancient
customs." The paintings, based on sketches, photos, and memories
accumulated during his travels between 1976 and 1989, present a
depoliticized world of beautiful, happy chil dren protected by parents;
the painting that serves also as the cover illustration is a good
example. In this painting, a Tibetan mother, arms around one child with
another snuggled on her back, faces the viewer. The children do not look
at the viewer, for such looking might interfere with their
representation as infants inhabiting a world of complete maternal power
and protection. The image is a striking contrast to both the motherless
image of Marianne on the cover of Good-bye Marianne and the restricted
power of historically situated mothers that Watts narrates. In The
Children of China, the children smile; the world is beautiful. Only the
introductory and concluding remarks give the historical context for
these utopian paintings. Only in those remarks and two paintings of his
own son, does the historical reality of the world Zhang's own son
faced come into focus.
In his conclusion, Zhang quotes his own father, "All children
are born good." He goes on to draw a parallel between artists and
children: both innocent, both aiming to understand and convey the magic
of the world; and concludes that the ancient art of China demonstrates
how art survives long after the empires established by powerful tyrants.
The need to say and believe this, to position himself against a
political use of art is understandable, but is nevertheless itself a
political conclusion. Not only for ignoring that all art, including the
art done in caves of Dunhuang, is always art done in a political,
historical and economic context. And the very marketing of the book by
Tundra for "ages 12 and up," is both revealing and
problematic. Presumably Tundra markets the book for this age group
because of the quality of the paintings, the implication being that
younger children will not appreciate such paintings, for surely the
content of Zhang's text would not pose problems for younger
children. Yet why not ma rket the book for adults? That the paintings
were originally bought by adults is acknowledged by the text where a
note thanks various individuals "for graciously lending their
paintings for the production of this book." Does the marketing
decision simply recognize that Western readers persist in thinking that
books with pictures are never intended for grown-ups, or does it
acknowledge that such readers might be perplexed by the book's
joyful ahistoricism? What exactly do we teach young adults about the
limits of history when we give them this admittedly beautiful book?
For such young adult readers are older than those to whom Tundra
believes we can present historical fiction such as Good-bye Marianne.
They are readers who are not so much innocent as simply ignorant of
Chinese history. Seeing with such ignorant Western eyes, what will they
see in Zhang's paintings of children outside Beijing? Despite the
cultural history depicted in the paintings, I suspect that such viewers
will take the world Zhang paints at face value. They will not see what
Zhang acknowledges, that utopia is always a place one longs for, not a
place that exists: I had mixed feelings as I painted this picture for I
have my own memories of working in the autumn woods. During the Cultural
Revolution, when I was sent to the countryside to be
'reeducated,' we collected leaves to use as food.
Instead they will see a world of happy people, painted in such a
way that history is presented as safely in the past, something that
happened long ago. Only the end notes about the Silk Road tell another
story, the very name reminding us that there is no place outside
history, however beautiful the pictures may be, and that children of
whatever age, however innocent, are always already historical subjects.