首页    期刊浏览 2024年10月06日 星期日
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Co-relational study of body types and fundamental neurotic reactions among adolescents of urban sector of Peshawar, Pakistan.
  • 作者:Nizam, Ghazala Y. ; Tariq, Mussarat ; Ijaz, Ayesha Anwar Ayesha
  • 期刊名称:Journal of Social and Psychological Sciences
  • 印刷版ISSN:1756-7483
  • 出版年度:2010
  • 期号:January
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:Oxford Mosaic Publications Limited
  • 关键词:Eating disorders;Somatotypes;Teenagers;Urban health;Youth

Co-relational study of body types and fundamental neurotic reactions among adolescents of urban sector of Peshawar, Pakistan.


Nizam, Ghazala Y. ; Tariq, Mussarat ; Ijaz, Ayesha Anwar Ayesha 等


1. INTRODUCTION

The potential effect of body type on personality and psychological well being has been a source of concern and researcher interest since the evolution of human beings. Many scholars believe that behaviour is related to individual's physical makeup or body. (Hall & Lindzey, 1970; John, 1986; Heymsfield, 2005; Bouchard, 1996; Shasby and Kingsley, 1978).

The purpose of the present research was to study the impact of body type and body image on behaviour of adolescents. To achieve the ideal body type is getting so much importance among adolescents that those who deviate from normal body weight tend to develop neurotic patterns.

As an approach to personality theory, typology has a history dating back to the ancient Greeks and was brought up to modern times by Sheldon and his collaborators (1942) as constitutional psychology. Sheldon stands for unique contribution on this aspect and provide a discrete number of physical and temperamental variables which he considered of primary importance in representing human behaviour. Considerable period of careful examining and judgment on physiques variations gave the primary components of physique. The first component was 'endomorphy,' the individuals high in this component are typified by softness and rounded quality is an underdevelopment of bone and muscle. The second component was referred to as 'mesomorphy'. A person high in this component has a hard and rectangular body, with a predominance of bone and muscle. The 'mesomorphic' body is strong, tough, and resistant to injury. The third component was labelled 'ectomorphy'. An individual who is at upper extreme in this component is linear and fragile, characterised by flatness of the chest and delicacy of the body.

Sheldon also identified three components of personality and discovered that there is correlation between physique and personality. The correlations are significant, indicating that endomorphs are more likely to have personalities strong in 'vicerotonia' (very sociable and outgoing). Mesomorphs are more likely to have personalities strong in 'somatotonia', (energetic and aggressive), and ectomorphs are more likely to have personalities strong in 'cerebrotonia' (shy and inhibited). Nash (1978) supported the Sheldonian perspective, that primary components serve to set limits upon a classified physique but within any single somatotype classification there is still room for tremendous variation. This variation is in part intercepted or accounted for by a series of secondary components. One of the most important secondary components is 'dysplasia'. It is a measure of disharmony between different areas of the physique, for example, head and neck of one somatotype and legs of another. Sheldon (1954) also did considerable work in the area of female somatotyping. He suggested that female's physiques are much more endomorphics than that of males.

It has been estimated by Stunkard (2000) that as many as twenty five percent of today's adolescents are obese. For him the societal modernisation tends to increase obesity in adolescents. These are much more likely to face both health and psychological challenges related to their childhood and adolescence than their leaner counterparts, (Andersen, 2000).

Appearance tends to play an important role in one's self-esteem whereas body weight can be another factor for determining attractiveness. It is estimated by Tiggemann (1996) that current body ideals may promote slimness for women and muscularity for males and consequently, females have reported a desire to be thinner while males wanted to be heavier. Body image disturbance in this sense has been defined by Smolak (2004) as any form of affective, cognitive, behavioural, or perceptual disturbance that is directly concerned with an aspect of physical appearance. He suggested that body dissatisfaction for both men and women as well as for adolescents has been shown to be correlated with BMI, that is calculation of body weight that normally goes with the given height.

It is assumed that adolescence is the time when many individuals become concerned about their appearance. As a result they take drastic and sometimes dangerous measures to develop a certain appearance and if they do not succeed, they may develop neurotic behaviour reactions such as severe depression, anxiety and stress. Supporting the same view, Stassen (2000) demonstrated that adolescence is one of the most turbulent periods in one's life span. It is the period when one becomes sexually mature and gets integrated into the society. Stassen further reported that a wide variety of physical changes in the adolescence bring about anxiety, self consciousness, changes in body image and various emotional changes. Berger (2000) also supported the above view that an adolescent is very much self conscious about his/her looks. At this age most boys wanted to be tall, broad shouldered and girls wanted to be pretty slim but shapely with nice hair and skin. Teenage boys and girls both worry about their weight, complexion and facial features.

As adolescence is a time of dramatic changes in physical appearance, (although a variety of nutritional and behavioural factors can also lead to weight gain during this stage), gaining weight can sometimes result directly from the physical changes of puberty. Mellits and Cheek (1970) reported that in adolescence boys and girls differ considerably in the development of adipose (fat-bearing) tissues. With increased height females' show a more marked growth of fat than males. Thompson (2005) cited that an obese and skinny person has a distorted perception of his/her body shape and size, compares it to others, and sometimes feels shame and anxiety. Being unhappy with one's body can affect how the person thinks and feels about him/herself. A poor body image can lead to emotional distress, low self-esteem, dieting, anxiety, depression, and eating disorders like anorexia nervosa and bulimia.

Mood and anxiety symptoms are ostensibly more likely a common consequence of starvation among people with or without eating disorders and tend to correlate with weight and body image disturbances. To be thin is considered healthy, attractive, and self-disciplined. Overweight individual is considered as lazy, dull, unattractive, and probably incompetent. Obesity has many psychological as well as bio chemical facets. In most cultures slimness is admired and obesity is deplored and because of that obese adolescents may have difficulty in establishing social relations because of derogatory cultural attitudes. Rightly or wrongly, the fat person is likely to blame him/herself for being what s/he is (Garner, 1997).

Another major cause of developing poor body image is believed to be the influence of mass media. Lerner and Steinberg (2004) argue that the mass media, including movies, television, and magazines, have come under fire from academics and members of the public for their sexualisation of young girls, the portrayal of violence, and the perpetuation of gender stereotypes and unrealistic expectations for body weight and appearance. Due to its influence, television has received special attention as a purveyor of messages containing gender stereotypes (Tiggemann and Pickering, 1996).

The television therefore becomes a matter of concern as media plays a big part in making girls overly concerned about their weight and body shape. They strive for the 'perfect' body and judge themselves by their looks, appearance, and above all thinness. Media surrounded by thin models and TV stars makes teenagers want to achieve the 'perfect' image. As a result, many teenage girls intensely dislike their bodies. These views tend to wear girls down and can shake their confidence and esteem. They may lose their sense of self, individuality and fall victim to 'narrow' definitions of beauty as portrayed by the media which may act as a propaganda machine determined to shake their confidence.

Smolak (2002) found that these extreme body image disturbances include body dysmorphic disorder, eating disorders and severe depression, anxiety and stress among adolescent girls. Rierdan and Koff (1997) supported the view that weight has a direct effect on body image and mood of girls. He conducted an experiment with sixth grade girls to find out how their weight affected their body image and they concluded that girls with a higher BMI tend to have more depressive symptoms.

A concern about body image has traditionally been thought to be a female preoccupation However; societal and cultural trends suggest that body image concerns may also affect males. Hendry & Gilles, (1978) found that adolescent male is vulnerable to the pressure to attain the 'ideal' male body. This ideal includes a masculine (V-shaped) physique, tallness, and muscularity (mesomorphic body builds). The current understanding of the etiology of body image disorders in boys and men is incomplete, restricted by limited research but Philpott and Shcppard (1998) supported the above mentioned view that the preference in society is toward mesomorphic males, and there is an aversion toward endomorphic (fat) and ectomorphic (thin) males. Therefore, it is believed that many boys and men who fall into the endomorphic or ectomorphic category recognise that they do not fit the 'ideal' and thus strive to obtain the more mesomorphic body that they see in television and movies, in magazines, and on romance novel covers. The men are doomed either to spending their lives chasing an impossible dream or to taking supplements and drugs that have very negative effects on overall health. Additionally, Pope et al., (2000) reported that more harmful, are the mesomorphic males who strive to become even more muscular, looking at a body type that, for most, is impossible to attain without the use of anabolic steroids.

Hoyt and Kogan (2001) discovered that, on average, men tend to emphasise physical attractiveness in relationships more than women, which might imply that even though a woman may accept her partner for his looks, the man may continue to be dissatisfied with himself. With the increasing emphasis in the media of a lean yet muscular male body as the ideal, it is no wonder that so many boys and men are becoming dissatisfied with their own bodies and are paying incredible costs to achieve the 'perfect' body.

Keel et al. (1998) further revealed that, like their female counterparts, males have disordered eating and dietary habits that many times occur in the absence of significant weight problems, and that this disordered eating appears to be more psychological than physical. Finally, Keel et al. reported that eating-disordered boys experience great body dissatisfaction, depression and perfectionism, as do eating-disordered females. Nath (2004) on the other hand suggested that physical exercise and games are important for physical development in adolescence. The well balanced body shows apt proportion between length and weight. The present research supports the evidences that suggests strong relationship between deviation from societal standards for body types and the development of depression, anxiety and stress.

2. METHODOLOGY

2.1 Statement of the Problem:

The study of relationship between constitutional variation and fundamental neurotic reactions among adolescents of NWFP.

2.2 Objectives:

1. To find out the level of depression, anxiety and stress among people with different body types.

2. To compare scores of male and female of various body types on DASS.

2.3 Hypotheses:

1. Body types tend to be related to the presence of clinical symptoms especially, depression, and girls are more likely to be depressed.

2. Deviation from the standard body type tends to cause anxiety among adolescents and girls are more likely to be anxious.

3. In order to get the ideal body size the ectomorphs and endomorphs tend to experience more stress.

2.4 Sample

The samples of 180 adolescents were randomly selected from various colleges of Peshawar district. The sample consisted of 60 obese, 60 optimal and 60 under weight boys and girls. Adolescents of 11th to 13th grade were targeted. Criterion of selection was their body weight that was identified by calculating their BMI which is a statistical measure of the weight for a person scaled according to height. United States of America Department of Agriculture (U.S.D.A) defined BMI as the individual's body weight in kilogram divided by the square of their height. Adolescents who had a BMI of 18.5 to 25 may indicate optimal weight and adolescents with BMI lower than 18.5 were considered as underweight, whereas adolescents with BMI above 30 were considered as obese (over 40, morbidly obese).

2.5 Procedure

Self constructed questionnaire was designed to collect the demographic data. The standard scale known as DASS was the measuring instrument for this study. DASS is a 42-item self-report measure of anxiety, depression and stress developed by Lovibond and Lovibond (1995) which is increasingly used in diverse settings.

3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The study was designed to find out the relationship of body types with the neurotic behaviour reactions among adolescents. The correlation between the body types and neurotic behaviour were determined through a systematic procedure. The neurotic patterns were determined by administering a standardised DASS. All the respondents were of the same age. The average weight and BMI of the research sample indicates that average weight of the ectomorph females was 41 kg with the BMI of 16 and this reflected that they were under weight. The mean weight of the mesomorph females was 52 kg with BMI of 20, which reflected the optimal weight. The mean weight of endomorph females recorded was 75 kg with BMI of 28 which, presents that they were over weight. In the case of male respondents the mean weight of the ectomorphs was 50 kg with BMI of 16. The average weight of the mesomorphs was 64 kg with BMI of 22 and mean weight of the endomorphs recorded was 82 kg with BMI of 27.

No evidence for the presence of health problems in majority of female and male adolescents with respect to their body types was found although some of the endomorph females (13%) had menstrual irregularities that could account for their obesity. The family history of the respondents revealed a strong relationship of family history and being under or overweight. The obese parents had obese children, whereas under weight parents had under weight children. Dietary intake of researched sample indicated that most of the ectomorphs (42%) used to take protein and vitamin rich food and 23% used to eat take away food. Mesomorphs used to take balanced diet, whereas 35% of endomorphs used to take diet majorly comprised of carbohydrates and fat. The frequency distribution of female respondents indicate that female were more depressed, anxious and under stress than males. Although the male respondents showed low signs of depression, anxiety and stress the study detected presence of neurotic patterns among male respondents.

The collected data reveals the presence of depression among all the three categories. Depression has been recognised as a major public health problem as it is ranked fourth among the global burden of diseases. The analysed data in table 1 concluded that endomorphs and ectomorphs had moderate depression level i.e. M = 17.9, SD = 5.9; M = 16.4, SD = 5.2 respectively. Whereas mesomorphs had mild depression level, i.e. M = 11.1, SD = 3.5. Statistical analysis showed that endomorphs had significantly high depression than the mesomorphs, t (7.6); p > 0.05 two tailed. Analysis revealed the significant difference for depression among ectomorphs than mesomorphs, t (6.5); p > 0.05 two tailed.

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

Severe anxiety among ectomorphs (M = 18.1, SD = 4.8) and endomorphs (M = 17.4, SD = 4.9) were found than mesomorphs who had moderate level of anxiety (M = 9.9, SD = 2.9). The t-test showed significant difference for anxiety among ectomorphs and mesomorphs, t (11.1); p > 0.05. On the other hand, t - statistics has shown no significant difference for stress among ectomorphs and endomorphs, t (-1.47); p > .0.05. Moderate level of stress was found among endomorphs (M = 22.8, SD = 7.5) and ectomorphs (M = 18.6, SD = 6.5), whereas mesomorphs had mild level of stress. (M = 16.1, SD = 4.5). Statistical analysis revealed significant difference for stress among endomorphs and mesomorphs, t (5.9); p > 0.05, two tailed.

Table 2 highlights the gender comparison on the three sub scales of DASS. The results showed that females were more likely to be depressed, anxious and under stress than males. Statistical analysis revealed significant high level of depression (t = 6.3; p > 0.05) among females. Similarly, females appeared more anxious than males (t = 5.1; p > 0.05). Further more t- statistic showed significant difference for gender on stress. Females appeared to be more under stress than males (t = 9.3); p > 0.05 two tailed. Also, females developed more signs of neuroses than males contemporaries.

Table 3 represents the mean and standard deviation scores on sub scores of depression. The depression sub scores included dysphoria, hopelessness, devaluation of life, self-deprecation, lack of interest/involvement, anhedonia, and inertia. The level of hopelessness was higher among endomorphs (M = 1.1, SD = .96) than ectomorphs (M = .66, SD = .89). On the other hand ectomorphs scored high on devaluation of life (M = 3.4, SD = 1.2) than endomorphs (M = 2.8, SD = 1.1). The situational anxiety is significantly high among endomorphs (M = 4.3, SD = 1.9) than among ectomorphs (M = 3.9, SD = 2.1). The level of subjective anxious effect was also significantly high among ectomorphs (M = 5.6, SD = 1.6) than endomorphs (M = 4.9, SD = 1.9). The ectomorphs were found to get more easily upset (M = 4.4, SD = 1.6) than endomorphs (M = 4.0, SD = 1.5).

Table 4 represents the factor matrix for DASS. The statistical procedure of Pearson r was used to determine the relationship of body type and neurotic behaviour patterns. The results determined the significant negative correlation on sub scores on DASS with gender. Almost all the sub scores of DASS were significantly correlated with each other, which further indicates the interdependency of these factors.

4. Suggestions and limitations

A research fills the gap in knowledge and provides grounds for further research. When undertaking a research project, one should first determine its suitability in terms of internal and personal factors. On the basis of present experience, it is suggested that other researchers can explore other aspects of body types, for instance, body types and psychological well being, level of aggression among different body types, social adjustment and social anxiety among different body types. It is also suggested that researchers should cover all the important aspects of the subject and carefully construct the questionnaire for better results. The reliability and validity of any standard test should be carefully checked. It is also suggested that researchers must disclose the socio economics status and other environmental and psychological factors related to body types and behaviour.

References:

Anderson, A., Conn, L., & Holbrook T. (2000). Making weight: Men's conflicts with food, appearance. Carlsbad, CA: Gurze Books.

Berger, S.K, (2000). The Developing Person Through Childhood and Adolescence. 5th Edition. City University of New York.

Bouchard, C. (1996) Genetics of Obesity in Humans: Current issues, ciba foundation, USA.

Garner DM, Garfinknel P, Schwartz D, Thompson M. (1980) "The great American shape-up". Psychol Rep; 47:483-91.

Hall & Lindzey, (1970) in smith, E.W.L. (1985) The body in psychotherapy, Mc Ferland Pub Company, USA.

Heymsfield, S., Lohman, T.G. (2005). Human Body Composition. 2nd edition. Human Kinetics.

Hoyt and Kogan (2001 Hoyt, W. D., & Kogan, L. R. (2001). "Satisfaction with body image and peer relationships". Sex Roles, 45(3/4), 199-215.

John, D.C. (1986 ), "Body image among adolescent girls and boys: A longitudinal study". Developmental Psychology 40(5), 823835. John, L. (1986). Thinking about Psychology. 3rd edition. McGraw Hill Publishing Company.

Keel, P. K., Klump, K. L., Leon, G. R., & Fulkerson, J. A. (1998). "Disordered eating in adolescent males from a school-based sample". The International Journal of Eating Disorders, 23(2), 125-132.

Lerner, R.M., Steinberg, L. (2004). Hand Book of Adolescent Psychology. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Lovibond, P.F. and Lovibond, S.H. (1995). "The structure of negative emotional state: Comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories". Behavior research and therapy, 33, 33543.

Mellits D.E., Cheek D.B.(1970) "The assessment of body water and fatness from infancy to adulthood". Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development; 35: 12-26

Nash, J. (1978). Developmental Psychology. A psychological approach.

Philpott, D., & Sheppard, G. (1998). "More than mere vanity: Men with eating disorders". Guidance and Counseling, 13(4), 28-33.

Pope, H.G., Phillips, K.A., Olivardia, R. (2000)The adonis complex: The secret crisis of male body obsession. New York,: Free Press.

Rierdan J., & Koff E. (1997). "Weight, weight-related aspects of body image and depression in early adolescent girls". Adolescence, 32, 615-625.

Shasby and Kingsley, (1978) "A study of behavior and body type in troubled youth", Journal of School Health: Feb; 48(2):103-7. Sheldon, H.W. (1942). The Varieties of Temperament: A Psychology of Constitutional Differences. New York: Harper.

Sheldon, H.W. (1954). An abstract of "Association between Obesity and Psychiatric Disorders in the US Adult Population Atlas of Men": A Guide for Somatotyping the Adult Male at All Ages. New York: Harper.

Smolak (2002) L and Levine M.(2001) "A two- year follow-up of a primary prevention program for negative body image and unhealthy weight regulation". Eating disorder, 9(4), 313-325.

Smolak L, Levine MP, Schermer F. (1919) "Parental input and weight concerns among elementary school children". Eating Disorder;25:263-71

Stassen (2000) The developing person through life span, Amazon.com

Steinberg, L. (1970). Adolescence. 2nd Edition. McGraw-Hill

Stunkard, AJ (2000) Old and new scales for the assessment of body image: perceptual and motor skills, 90(3): 930-930

Thompson (2005) Thompson, J. K. (Ed.) (2004). Handbook of eating disorders and obesity. New York: Wiley.

Thompson, J. K., & Tantleff, S. T. (1992). "Female and male ratings of upper torso: Actual, ideal, and stereotypical conceptions". Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 7, 345-354.

Tiggemann (1996), M & Lynch, J.E(2001). "Body image across the life span in adult women: the role of self-objectification". Developmental Psychology, 37(2), 243-253.

Tiggemann, M., and Pickering, A. S. (1996). "Role of television in adolescent women's body dissatisfaction and drive for thinness". International Journal of Eating Disorders, 20, 199-203.

Internet References:

http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/112466543/abstract

http://www.accessmylibrary.com/coms2/summary_028630172421 ITM

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phenotype

http://science.jrank.org/pages/2998/Genotype-Phenotype.html

http://archpedi.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/142/10/1114

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2250423

http://www.pakmed.net/access/psy72.htm

http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Our+bodies,+ourselves+revisited:+mal e+body+image+and+psychological...-a0159027487

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi m2248/is n127 v32/ai 20413252

http://www.faqs.org/abstracts/Food-cooking-nutrition/Long-term programming-of-body-size-Human-variation-in-body-mass-evidence for-a-role-of-the-genes.html

http://books.google.com.pk/books?id=66V5ZovKA4wC&pg=PA244& lpg=PA244&dq=role+of+genotype+and+environment+on+human+bo dy&source=bl&ots=rm0iJvuJn&sig=qq6HtL5THGWixLSgxndz0ncqJj

I&hl=en&ei=PEbjSenLBJuItAPoqcSuCQ&sa=X&oi=book result&ct =result&resnum=2#PPA243,M1

http://books.google.com.pk/books?id=u4uzPlgcWpsC&dq=influence+ of+body+types+on+behavior+of+an+individual&source=gbs summar y_s&cad=0

http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/redirect3.cgi?&&auth=0VIvNgSA HH7K0QLcBe0oKo9dyeIG7dW3WUPlI75CI&reftype=extlink&artid =1790700&article-id=1790700&iid=141458&issueid=141458&jid=440&journal-

id=440&FROM=Article%7CCitationRef&TO=External%7CLink%7C URI&rendering-type=normal&&http://www.pmdc.org.pk/stat/htm

Dr. Ghazala Y. Nizam, Mussarat Tariq, Ayesha Anwar Ayesha Ijaz

Email: (CorrespondingAuthor) neeshy1@yahoo.com
Table 1

                Ectomorph         Endomorph          Ectomorph
                   vs.               vs.                vs.
                Endomorph         Mesomorph          Mesomorph
                  DASS

                T        p        T        p         T        p

Depression     6.5      0.05     7.6      0.05      -1.47    m.s
Anxiety        11.0     0.05     9.9      0.05      0.73     m.s
Stress         2.4      0.05     5.9      0.05      -3.3     m.s

Table 2
Differences between the mean on DASS for Gender

Gender/         Female        Male           t     P
DASS
                M      SD     M      SD

Depression      17.6   6.5    6.3    12.6    3.5   0.05
Anxiety         17.2   6.3    5.1    13.1    4.1   0.05
Stress          23.1   6.5    9.3    15.2    4.6   0.05

Table 3
DASS sub scores.

DASS sub-scores            Ectomorphs     Mesomorphs     Endomorphs
                           (n = 60)       (n = 60)       (n = 60)

                           M      (SD)    M      (SD)    M      (SD)

Depression sub-score       16.4   5.2     11.1   3.5     17.9   5.9
Dysphoria                  3.7    1.6     2.3    1.4     3.3    1.3
Hopelessness               .66    .89     .63    .91     1.1    .96
Devaluation of life        3.4    1.2     2.8    1.0     2.8    1.1
Self-deprecation           1.9    1.4     1.1    1.2     1.9    1.5
Lack of interest/
  involvement              1.6    1.3     1.1    1.2     2.1    1.4
Anhedonia                  1.8    1.3     1.1    1.1     1.7    1.2
Inertia                    2.1    1.6     1.5    1.4     2.2    1.5
Anxiety sub-score          18.1   4.8     9.9    2.9     17.4   4.9
Autonomic arousal          5.8    2.2     4.4    2.5     6.3    3.7
Skeletal musculature
  effects                  3.2    1.1     2.1    1.1     3.0    1.3
Situational anxiety        3.9    2.1     3.2    1.2     4.3    1.9
Subjective anxious
  affect                   5.6    1.6     3.9    1.3     4.9    1.9
Stress sub-score           18.6   6.5     22.8   7.58    22.8   7.5
Difficulty relaxing        4.0    2.0     2.8    1.9     4.1    2.4
Nervous arousal            2.9    1.4     2.7    .92     3.0    1.2
Easily upset/agitated      4.4    1.6     3.8    1.4     4.0    1.5
Irritable/over-reactive    3.2    1.4     2.3    1.6     3.3    1.9
Impatient                  3.8    1.2     3.4    .96     4.0    1.3

Table 4 (A)--Factor Matrix of DASS Scale

            B.T    D          A          S          D1

Gender      .000   -.428 **   -.362 **   -.575 **   -.362 **

Body type          .107       -.048      .253 **    -.102
D                             .634 **    .593 **    .549 **
A                                        .516 **    .509 **
S                                                   .377 **
D1
D2
D3
D4
D5
D6
D7
A1
A2
A3
A4
S1
S2
S3
S4

            D2         D3         D4         D5         D6

Gender      -.029      -.333 **   -.276 **   -.211 **   -.107

Body type   .221 **    -.193 **   -.014      .125       -.026
D           .291 **    .379 **    .542 **    .496 **    .375 **
A           .185 *     .322 **    .399 **    .326 **    .280 **
S           .252 **    .279 **    .443 **    .389 **    .212 **
D1          .019       .499 **    .263 **    .246 **    .132
D2                     -.005      .214 **    .082       .131
D3                                .145       .189 *     .088
D4                                           .259 **    .127
D5                                                      .218 **
D6
D7
A1
A2
A3
A4
S1
S2
S3
S4

            D7         A1         A2         A3         A4

Gender      -.378 **   -.304 **   -.427 **   -.196 **   -.455 **

Body type   .009       .073       -.075      .091       -.144
D           .589 **    .357 **    .514 **    .403 **    .467 **
A           .426 **    .423 **    .625 **    .497 **    .645 **
S           .375 **    .408 **    .434 **    .445 **    .386 **
D1          .353 **    .151 *     .481 **    .288 **    .458 **
D2          .202 **    -.005      .094       .275 **    .109
D3          .149 *     .062       .309 **    .136       .284 **
D4          .309 **    .264 **    .299 **    .271 **    .341 **
D5          .231 **    .152 *     .232 **    .153 *     .081
D6          .194 **    .131       .184 **    .191 *     .127
D7                     .120       .294 **    .275 **    .376 **
A1                                .354 **    .263 **    .380 **
A2                                           .245 **    .470 **
A3                                                      .317 **
A4
S1
S2
S3
S4

            S1         S2         S3         S4         S5

Gender      -.362 **   -.230 **   -.384 **   -.217 **   -.319 **

Body type   -.086      .000       -.172 *    .040       -.040
D           .484 **    .354 **    .318 **    .363 **    .377 **
A           .413 **    .285 **    .329 **    .366 **    .335 **
S           .593 **    .392 **    .437 **    .564 **    .367 **
D1          .272 **    .285 **    .315 **    .264 **    .318 **
D2          .255 **    .179 *     .016       .212 **    .186 *
D3          .328 **    .301 **    .286 **    .173 *     .305 **
D4          .491 **    .366 **    .183 *     .251 **    .466 **
D5          .332 **    .262 **    .214 **    .130       .271 **
D6          .253 **    .074       .057       .117       .097
D7          .318 **    .314 **    .150 *     212 **     .293 **
A1          .176 *     .056       .183 *     .173 *     .130
A2          .279 **    .307 **    .288 **    .331 **    .294 **
A3          .353 **    .198 **    .273 **    .276 **    .180 *
A4          .341 **    .198 **    .269 **    .269 **    .339 **
S1                     .401 **    .417 **    .353 **    .362 **
S2                                .317 **    .245 **    .251 **
S3                                           .281 **    .201 **
S4                                                      .228 **

** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed)

* Correlation is significant at 0.05 level (2-tailed)


联系我们|关于我们|网站声明
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有