首页    期刊浏览 2025年07月15日 星期二
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Innovative Justice.
  • 作者:Marshall, Daniel
  • 期刊名称:British Journal of Community Justice
  • 印刷版ISSN:1475-0279
  • 出版年度:2015
  • 期号:March
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:Sheffield Hallam University
  • 摘要:Hannah Graham and Rob White (2015) Oxon: Routledge. pp 170 (hbk) 85.00 [pounds sterling] ISBN 978-0415-63211-9
  • 关键词:Books

Innovative Justice.


Marshall, Daniel


INNOVATIVE JUSTICE

Hannah Graham and Rob White (2015) Oxon: Routledge. pp 170 (hbk) 85.00 [pounds sterling] ISBN 978-0415-63211-9

Innovative Justice provides a welcome addition to the field of criminology and criminal justice. The global reshaping and restructuring of criminal justice systems and agencies has increased acceptance of social entrepreneurship and innovative justice 'making a positive difference in the lives of offenders and those around them' (p. 1). This timely book presents a number of innovative projects in criminal justice from jurisdictions around the world. The authors take on quite a challenge in doing this, as these innovative projects are subject to (sometimes unpredictable) rapid changes from 'fiscal insecurity, short-termism in funding and electoral cycles and politics of the jurisdictions and social contexts in which they exist' (p.17). There are also very challenging methodological issues with research of this magnitude. The authors use an Appreciative Inquiry (AI) approach which is an applied and collaborative method with an action-oriented change focus, which is positive and strengths-based (p.13). The research method itself is somewhat innovative, and the authors succeed in delivering a ground-breaking and inspirational book.

Innovative Justice comprises eight chapters: Chapter one begins with a critical overview of the paradoxes of justice in criminal justice systems around the world, and it outlines the key concepts and theoretical foundations of the book, notably theories of desistance. A discussion of defining innovative justice follows with an overview of the research methods adopted.

The innovations are presented in chapters two to seven through six broad themes: (1) the arts: from prison-based initiatives teaching skilled needlework to inmates in England and Wales to hand-crafted products such as greeting cards and home furnishings in Bolivia; (2) Skills-based initiatives: a number of vocational and educational prison initiatives from the United States and the United Kingdom, that include programmes teaching prisoners entrepreneurial skills or building motorcycles, and workshops in shoe and watch repairs possibly leading to employment post-release; (3) Greening justice: a number of initiatives which 'provide in-depth insight into the human dimensions associated with learning about, interacting with, and deriving benefit from Nature' (p.54). Examples include a prison gardening and horticultural initiative in Australia and a project in Papua New Guinea teaching inmates and correctional officers the basics of fish farming; (4) Animals and therapeutic justice: therapeutic benefits of including animals in a variety of criminal justice contexts including prison-based animal programmes in the United States, which deliver therapeutic, rehabilitative and vocational projects with inmates, and a programme in Israel providing dog training classes to prisoners with complex needs; (5) Countering extremism: chapter six focuses on working with terrorist and extremist offenders in Saudi Arabia and reducing hate crimes in Northern Ireland. Although the authors acknowledge they 'are not subject experts' (p.93), they provide a good discussion and reflection of the innovations and ideas; (6) Community-based justice: the Yellow Ribbon Project in Singapore raises public awareness and community support for the reintegration of exoffenders from their communities, and an initiative in Australia that trains prisoners to volunteer as community sports umpires whilst serving prison sentences.

All empirical chapters are similarly structured, sharing common sub-headings. The structure works very well and allows for continuity throughout the book, which increases content accessibility. The empirical chapters outline the 'Foundational concepts and practices,' and each initiative is described under the heading 'Snapshots of innovation', with a review section, 'Understanding best practices' critically appraising the initiatives' key lessons and learning points. Next, the section 'Questions and critical reflections' offers 'an opportunity to encourage critical thought and reflexive application' (p.18).

In chapter eight, the authors draw together the key themes, issues and critical reflections of the book, highlighting the challenges and positive contribution of innovation in criminal justice very well. In particular, suggesting core principles for innovation and advocating the use of strengths-based approaches in researching and evaluating such initiatives.

The analysis is heavily focused on prison-based projects and initiatives, and a complimentary review of community-based projects within each themed section would have strengthened the empirical chapters. In addition, a key concern of projects and initiatives working with offenders is the evaluation of their impact. Whilst some of the initiatives appear to have incorporated evaluative processes, this was unclear for many of those presented, and some discussion of evaluation of impact would have been useful. The critical reflection sections assist the reader in understanding the themes of best practice for the initiatives presented, and they provide questions to encourage critical thought, which adds to the concise and accessible nature of the book.

Overall, the authors set out to 'promote innovation and improvement in services and systems that work with ex-offenders' and pursue their passion for 'what else works' (p.12). They achieve this in a thoughtful and well-structured book, which will be of valued interest to academics, criminal justice practitioners, students and innovators.

Dr Daniel Marshall, Managing Director, 81 Dots and Visiting Scholar, Institute of Criminology, University of Cambridge
联系我们|关于我们|网站声明
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有