Peter Isard, Leslie Lipschitz, Alexandros Mourmouras, Boriana Yontcheva (eds). The Macroeconomic Management of Foreign Aid--Opportunities and Pitfalls.
Javid, Muhammad
Peter Isard, Leslie Lipschitz, Alexandros Mourmouras, Boriana
Yontcheva (eds). The Macroeconomic Management of Foreign
Aid--Opportunities and Pitfalls. Washington, DC: International Monetary
Fund. 2006. 277 pages. Paperback. US $28.
The ten articles in this book written by internationally well-known
economists and presented in a seminar organised by the International
Monetary Fund and other international financial institutions are
concerned with the scaling up of foreign aid in order to achieve the
Millennium Development Goals. These articles address the issues such as
the relationship between aid, growth, and poverty reduction;
effectiveness of foreign aid conditions for macroeconomic policies; the
potential for large increases in aid to affect the competitiveness of
the recipient country adversely; volatility and unpredictability of
foreign aid; the impact of higher aid flows on the debt sustainability
of recipients; and the effect of aid on institutions.
Steven Radelet's paper on "Aid and Growth"
disaggregates aid into humanitarian assistance, early impact aid to
finance infrastructure, and direct investment and other sectors, and
late impact aid to finance investments in human capital and social
capital. He concludes that early impact aid has a strong and robust
impact on growth, but argues that aid is not fully fungible and
different types of aid have different types of relation to growth. Aart
Kraay's "Aid Growth and Poverty" focuses on the
effectiveness of aid in the presence of macroeconomic policies and finds
that only 4 percent variation is explained by aid. He also points out
that growth is the predominant force behind poverty reduction, and
governance problems are a significant constraint on both growth and
poverty reduction.
David L. Bevan reviews the macroeconomic issues and concludes that
there is no general case for believing that enhanced resources cannot be
used effectively even if aid is large relative to the economy. High aid
inflow in a case study of Ghana examines the macroeconomic policy
response to scaling up aid inflow in 2001-03. The authors state that the
aid inflows during this period were volatile and unpredictable,
fluctuating by several percentage points of GDP. The findings of the
study suggest that aid may be useful temporarily, and aid would appear
to be the least attractive option especially when domestic sterilisation
is used to avoid pressure on inflation and exchange rate appreciation.
Mark and Hans examine the issue of the effective absorption
capacity of the economy as a result of higher resource flows. They
analyse the Ethiopian case by distinguishing between direct aid and
spending aid on social sectors to achieve the MDGs. Spending on
infrastructure helps to achieve the objective of poverty reduction and
spending on social services helps to achieve the other MDGs. The study
considers the trade-off between infrastructure and social spending. The
results also suggest that Dutch disease is a serious concern in the case
of Ethiopia. The large scale of aid inflow, other than direct aid, is
costly.
Christopher Adam's study is concerned with two objectives:
first, the macroeconomic transmission from aid inflows to the real
exchange rate and export performance; and, second, the determining of
the macroeconomic response to increased aid flows. The central messages
of this study is that when there is an initial lack of public
infrastructure, aid impact is positive. The real exchange rate may
overshoot due to the economy's response to aid inflow; aid inflow
may shift the non-tradable goods supply significantly.
According to Bulir and Hamann's findings, aid is more volatile
than domestic revenue. Daseking and Joshi analyse the debt
sustainability problems of low-income countries and find that for many
countries the debt sustainability problems worsened, even though the
loans were highly concessional. In the final chapter, the authors
analyse the relationships among aid, governance, and political economy.
They conclude that policies may be insufficient to achieve growth when
institutions are weak.