The supply and demand for exports of Pakistan: the polynomial distributed lag model (PDL) approach.
Atique, Zeshan ; Ahmad, Mohsin Hasnain
This study examines the individual (short-run) and cumulative
(long-run) elasticities of determinants of export demand and supply
using annual data over the period 1972-2000 by employing Almon
Polynomial Distributed Lag Model. The main findings of the study are
that Real Effective Exchange Rate (REER) is only significant but less
elastic in the long run, and the world economic activity has individual
and cumulative significant elastic effect in the case of export demand.
On the other hand, domestic capacity utilisation has significant elastic
effect on export supply. Relative prices and individual impact of wage
rate are insignificant. However, cumulative effect of wage rate is
significant but less elastic. The empirical results show a strong
relationship between domestic capacity of production, the world economic
activity, and export performance of Pakistan. The results also suggest
that the cumulative effect of wage rate and REER is significant;
however, its impact is relatively small on the export performance of
Pakistan.
1. INTRODUCTION
In the global economy, the performance of any country will greatly
depend on the performance of its exports. The trade performance
determines the prospects of change. It helps countries win friends, and
break the traditional mould of isolation and indifference. The
performance of exports of countries depends on various price and
non-price factors.
In international trade transactions it is important to recognise
that these transactions require some amount of time that occurs between
the decision to buy and actual delivery of the product from foreign
country. In the Econometric modelling lag occupies a central role. It is
recognised that due to psychological, technical and institutional
reasons, a dependent variable may respond to explanatory variables with
lapse of time, in particular when dealing with time-series trade models.
A number of studies have been conducted to examine the export
performance of Pakistan. In the best of our knowledge, no study has been
undertaken incorporating lags to examine the individual and cumulative
impact of determinants of export performance of Pakistan.
Thus, the ultimate purpose of this paper is to estimate consistent
individual (short run) and cumulative (long run) elasticities of both
export demand and supply determinants using annual data over the period
1972-2000 by applying Almon approach. (l)
The plan of the paper is as follows: Section 2 presents literature
review; while the data set and model are discussed in Section 3; the
result and interpretations of these analyses are in Section 4 and
conclusion and policy implications are summarised in the last.
2. LITERATURE REVIEW
Various studies have been conducted incorporating different
determinants of export growth to evaluate the performance of the
variables affecting exports and imports in different countries.
Houthakker and Magee (1969) conducted pioneering study to determine
export performance using time series data. Khan and Goldstein (1978)
later examined elasticity of determinants of export demand and supply
for the sample of eight countries by using simultaneous approach (2SLS).
They found large export price elasticities of demand with medium term
effect of independent variables on the adjustment of exports and also
explained world income as a significant component of export demand.
Goldar (1989) estimated the effect of productivity increase on
India's export performance in engineering products and found out
positive relationship between world demand and export performance of
India's engineering sector. Roy (1991) also supported the finding
of Goldar and found out world demand along with exchange rate as
important factors in determination of export performance of Bangladesh.
He found out that the devaluation has some positive impacts on export
performance of Bangladesh. Ahmad (2000) by applying Cointegration
Technique and Error Correction Model for the export supply of Bangladesh
found the significant relationship between the export price, exchange
rate, domestic capacity, and export supply of Bangladesh.
In the case of Pakistan the studies conducted during the last two
decades used different techniques and incorporated different
determinants for export performance. Initially studies were conducted
assuming export demand as exogenous [Naqvi (1982) and (1983)]. Anwer
(1985) used the simultaneous approach (2SLS) to examine export
performance of Pakistan. He found the price elasticities are not
significant while world income and domestic production significantly
explain the demand and supply side of export respectively. For Pakistan
Hasan and Khan (1994) carried out study and specified demand-side
factors and supply-side factors for export performance of Pakistan. They
also examined impact of exchange rate policy on Pakistan's trade
balance by applying 3SLS technique. Their results showed that export
demand is positively related with world demand and negatively related
with relative export price in case of both primary and manufactured
exports. The nominal exchange rate, on other hand, posited a positive
and significant relationship between export demand in both cases.
Another study for the determination of export demand and export supply
factors conducted by Sajjad and Fauzia (2000) for Pakistan's
economy, they examined the impact of exchange rate policy of Pakistan.
They also determined the price and income impact on trade balance with
respect to four major trade partners. They estimated Cobb-Douglas form
equation using 3SLS technique.
In summary the world income is one of the most important
determinants of export demand, whereas, the exchange rate (2) shows
statistically mixed results on export performance. Empirical studies showed domestic capacity utilisation as a significant determinant on
supply side, while; relative prices do not reach the traditional level
of significance in all studies.
3. THE MODEL AND DATA SOURCE
In order to realise aim of the study, world demand for Pakistan
goods is specified in log-linear form. The demand function can be
expressed in the following form:
Ln Xd = [alpha].sub.0] + [[alpha].sub.1] + LnREER + [[alpha].sub.2]
Ln EA + [u.sub.1] (1)
It is expected that [alpha].sub.1] will be negative and
[[alpha].sub.2] positive
Xd = Quantity of Export Demanded
EA = World Economic Activities
REER = Real Effected Exchange Rate
In this study world economic activity is represented by industrial
production index of industrial countries (IPI). (3)
Since the above equation is specified in log-linear [[alpha].sub.1]
and [[alpha].sub.2] are the elasicities of demand of export with respect
explanatory variables. The Supply of export is specified as follows
Ln Xs = [[beta].sub.0 + [[beta].sub.1] Ln (RP) + [[beta].sub.2] Ln
Y + [[beta].sub.3] Ln Wr + [u.sub.2] (2)
Where it is expected [[beta].sub.1], [[beta].sub.2]> 0 and
[[beta].sub.2<]0, similarly as mention above [[beta].sub.1],
[[beta].sub.2] and [[beta].sub.3] are the elasicities of supply of
export with respect explanatory variables
Xs = quantity of supply of export
RP = ([UVE.sub.pak]/[CPI.sub.pak]) relative prices, the unit value
of export ([UVE.sub.pak]) of Pakistan to domestic prices of Pakistan
([CPI.sub.pak])
Y = Domestic Production Capacity
Wr = Wage Rate per Worker (4)
Predicted values of real GDP (1980=100) used as a proxy variable
for domestic production capacity of economy.
In order to estimate the distributed lag model, Equations (1) and
(2) remodeled as follows. (5)
The export equation becomes
[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (3)
The supply equation becomes
[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (4)
Equations (3) and (4) were estimated using the Almon lag procedure
with K=3 (6) and the degree of polynomial were 2 with no end constraint.
Before going on data few words are in order about the data. The
estimation was performed using annual data for years 1972-2000, all the
data are annual and taken from the following sources:
1. International Financial Statistic (IFS).
2. Economic Survey (ES), various issues.
3. Statistical Year Book (SYB).
Data for unit value of export (UVX), volume of export (VEX),
consumer price index (CPI) of Pakistan and world consumer price index
(WCPI), Industrial production index (IPI) exchange rate (ER) of selected
export partner countries of Pakistan (7) are taken from (IFS). Data for
wage rate is taken from (SYB) and data for export of selected countries,
real GDP of Pakistan are taken from (ES). This data is further used for
estimation of variables. (8)
4. EMPIRICAL RESULTS
The estimated export demand equation is satisfactory with respect
to sign, high adjusted [R.sup.2], no autocorrelation and particularly
significance of long run coefficients of both explanatory variables. The
current and lagged one, two and three of REER is insignificant at 5
percent level, but cumulative effect is significant at 5 percent level.
Thus, results indicate that a 1 percent decrease in REER would
increase the quantity of export demanded by 0.49 percent in current
year, 0.36 percent in second year, 0.53 percent and 0.003 percent in
third and fourth years respectively. Similarly, 1 percent devaluation or
depreciation of Rupees will increase the export demand by 0.39 percent
in long run.
The result shows that the elasticity of demand for export with
respect to real effective exchange rate is inelastic short run
(individually) as well as in long run (cumulatively).
The elasticity of demand for export with respect to IPI index is
inelastic for individual years except forth year. Their cumulative
effect in long run is elastic, the sum of elasticity is greater than one
that is, 2.9 and significant at 1 percent level.
The current industrial production index is significant at 5 percent
up to 2 lags. This suggests that IPI would take 3 years to have full
impact on quanity of export demanded.
In particular, 1 percent increase in industrial index would
increase the export of Pakistan by 0.33 percent in current year, 0.69
percent in second year, 0.68 percent in third year and 1.5 percent in
forth year.
The results of export supply equation are significant with respect
to sign and high-adjusted [R.sup.2] and no autocorrelation.
The coefficient of relative price has correct sign but
insignificant, predicted values of real GDP and cumulative effect of
wage rate have emerged as significant determinant of export supply
function.
The performance of (LY) is according with theory; with coefficient
being significant the (LY) elasticity is elastic with respect to export
supply and also significant. The result suggests that 1 percent increase
in domestic capacity of the economy will increase the export supply by
3.7 percent.
The coefficient of wage rate is insignificant individually at 5
percent but significant at 5 percent at cumulative level, elasticity of
export supply with respect to wage rate is inelastic. Results suggest
that 1 percent increase in wage rate the export supply will decrease by
.7 percent. Our result is in the line of structuralist economists that
reduction in real wage without increasing productivity does not increase
output and employment [Taylor (1990) and Trap (1993)]
5. CONCLUSION AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS
The empirical results suggest that the world economic activity and
real effective exchange rate are the important determinants of export
demand of Pakistan. However significant and inelastic coefficient of
REER on demand side in the long run points out towards an interesting
policy implication that devaluation or depreciation may not be an
effective source of export growth in Pakistan.
The significant and elastic coefficient of world economic activity
shows colossal dependence of Pakistan's export on trading pattern in the world economies. The results indicate that the government should
monitor the business cycles of its trade partners in order to target
expanding exports during their periods of cyclical booms. Government
should make it a priority in its policy agenda to expand exports to
major trade partners by diversification of exports with better quality
products and high value added components.
On the supply side the wage rate is although insignificant in the
short run but its cumulative effect is significant and less elastic. Our
result is in the line of structuralist economists that institutions
(economic and political) do matter. The coefficient of domestic
production capacity is significant and elastic that shows greater role
of domestic production in determination of export of Pakistan. These
results suggest need of policies for greater utilisation of productive
capacity of the economy. While insignificant relative price coefficient
suggests that it is not statistically important determinant of export
supply in case of Pakistan.
Despite the importance of above mentioned factors non price factors
such as product differentiation, trade promotion, facilities at ports,
infrastructural facilities, etc. may also produce greater influence on
export performance and government should also consider non price factors
in future policy formulation to promote export.
APPENDIX
Real Effective Exchange Rate
In this section, we shall briefly explain the calculation of
Pakistan's rupees real effective exchange rate based on export
weighted exchange rate. For export weighted exchange rate, the trade
partners were chosen on the basis of exports are more than 1 percent in
total exports in 1990.
Let [X.sup.p.sub.0] be the value of exports to the pth trading
partner in the base period (0), expressed in that partner's
currency. Let [e.sup.p.sub.1] and [e.sup.p.sub.0] be the dollar values
($/currency) of one unit of the pth partner's currency in period 1
and in the base period (0), respectively, and [e.sup.r.sub.1] and
[e.sup.r.sub.1] be the dollar values ($/currency) of one unit of the
reporting country's currency in period 1 and in the base period
(0), respectively. Then, to compare the change in the values of the base
period's export earnings (from all partners) owing to exchange rate
movements, the following ratio is formed
E = [summation over (p)] [X.sub.o.sup.p] ([e.sup.p.sub.1] /
[e.sup.r.sub.1]) / [summation over (p)] [X.sub.o.sup.p] ([e.sup.p.sub.o]
/ [e.sup.p.sub.o]) * 100 (1)
Where, subscripts refer to the time period and superscripts to the
country. The price and quantity components [X.sup.p.sub.0] of the value
of export receipts are held constant only the relative exchange rates
are changed. Through simple manipulation,
Equation (1) can written in a form readily recognisable from the
effective exchange rate literature
E = [summation over (p)] [W.sup.p.sub.0] / [summation]
[W.sup.p.sub.0] ([e.sup.p.sub.1] / [e.sup.p.sub.0] / [e.sup.r.sub.1] /
[e.sup.r.sub.0] * 100 (2)
Where,
[W.sup.p.sub.0] = [X.sup.p.sub.0] [e.sup.p.sub.0] / [e.sup.r.sub.0]
In formulation (2), the index is shown to be simply the bilateral
export weighted index of the nominal effective exchange rate described
by the Rhomberg
[(1976), p. 95]. The result [e.sup.p.sub.1] /[e.sup.p.sub.0] and
[e.sup.r.sub.1] / [e.sup.r.sub.0] are the indices changes from the base
period
in p's and r's numeraire exchange rates, respectively.
Nominal Effective Exchange Rate--Adjustment for Inflation
Differentials
Consider the nominal index rate derived in formulations (1) and
(2). Deflating equation (1) by the ratio of price changes from the base
period in the partner countries to that in the reporting country gives,
after a number of mathematical manipulations,
R = [summation over (p)] [Z.sup.p] ([e.sup.pr.sub.1] /
[e.sup.pr.sub.0] / [e.sup.pr.sub.1] / [e.sup.pr.sub.0] (3)
where, [Z.sub.p] = [W.sup.p.sub.0] / [summation over (p)]
[W.sup.p.sub.0] is the bilateral export share; [e.sup.pr.sub.0] =
[e.sup.pr.sub.0] / [e.sup.r.sub.0] and
[e.sup.pr.sub.1] = [e.sup.p.sub.1] [e.sup.r.sub.1] are bilateral
exchange rates of the partner countries to those of the
reporting country at time 0 and time 1, respectively; and
[p.sup.pr.sub.0] = [p.sup.p.sub.0] / [p.sup.r.sub.0] and
[p.sup.pt.sub.1] = [p.sup.p.sub.1] / [p.sup.r.sub.1] are the ratios
of export process of the partner countries to those of reporting country
at time 0 and time 1.
Equation (3) can, in turn, be easily expressed in a more reduced,
mathematically equivalent form, that is,
R = [summation over (p)] [Z.sub.p] (r.sup.p.sub.1] /
[r.sup.p.sub.0] (4)
Where [r.sup.p.sub.1] = [e.sup.pr.sub.1] / [p.sup.pr.sub.1] and
[r.sup.p.sub.1] = [e.sup.pr.sub.0] / [p.sup.pr.sub.0] so that R is a
weighted sum of real exchange rates.
Production Capacity of Economy
For production capacity of economy, the Predicted value of real GDP
(1990=-100) used as proxy of real GDP [See Khan and Goldstein (1978) and
Abroad (2000)].
Comments
I would like to congratulate the young authors on a worthwhile
effort in understanding and modelling aggregate exports of Pakistan.
Unfortunately, I only received the paper a few days ago, and could not
give it the attention that it deserved. The paper offers us a number of
intriguing puzzles, resolution of which is likely to improve the paper,
and our understanding of the nature of Pakistan's exports,
substantially.
The first puzzle: The authors claim that the Hausman test shows
that there is no simultaneity problem between the supply and demand
equation for Pakistani Exports. As Supply and Demand is the classic case
of simultaneity, we wonder how this could be so. Of course, it is
well-known that simultaneity tests often have low power, and so this
could be a case of type II error--there is simultaneity, but the tests
failed to detect. If we give the test the benefit of the doubt, and
assume that the result is valid, then we must explain how it is that the
price of exports is exogenous to the system. On reflection, this is only
possible if Pakistan is too small an exporter to influence the price of
its exports. In this case, the price of Pakistani exports would be
determined on the world market. The quantity of Pakistani exports would
then be determined PURELY by the supply equation. There would be no
demand for Pakistani exports as such--Pakistani exports would be a small
part of the world market, and the world demand would be for the goods.
To see this, consider a farmer growing a crop in a competitive market.
There is no demand for farmer X's crop or farmer Y's crop;
there is only an aggregate demand which all farmers together fulfil in
equilibrium. Let us call this case A:
Case A: Pakistan is a small supplier of exports, and does not
influence world prices. In this case, the supply function will
completely determine exports. There will be no demand for Pakistani
exports as such. There will be a world demand function, but it will be
demand for all world equivalents of Pakistani exports, from whatever
country of origin.
Assessment: How realistic is this? Most of Pakistan exports are
commodities, like wheat, rice, cotton, etc. In some of these markets,
Pakistan is a big exporter on world markets and may have some influence
on the price. In other cases, Pakistan is small, and has no effect on
the world price. It would require more detailed analysis to assess the
realism of this assumption. For suitable models, it may be advisable to
disaggregate exports into these two types, as suitable exogeneity
assumptions are different in the two types of models. In case A,
however, the demand equation is clearly misspecified.
Clarification: If any of these variables on the RHS of either
equation are endogenously determined, then there will be simultaneity
bias. There is no simultaneity bias if and only if all variables on the
right hand side are exogenous. But if all RHS variables are exogenous
then there are two different equations, both of which determine the same
variable. This is impossible--two different independent equations cannot
both determine the same quantity unless there is some variable on the
RHS which adjusts to equilibrate (and hence is endogenous).
Case B: Pakistan is a big exporter and does influence world price
for Pakistani exports. In this case, there will definitely be a
simultaneity problem. There are two other problems which need to be
considered. (B1) If Pakistani exports are considered as a unique good,
with Pakistan as a sole supplier, then we have a monopoly exporter. In
this case, the demand curve is properly specified, but there is no
supply curve as such. The quantity of Pakistani exports would be
determined by the demand equation together with the cost curves and
profit maximisation for the monopolist. This appears to be unrealistic.
(B2) For items like wheat, cotton, and rice, Pakistan is a big exporter,
but not the only exporter. Here we have an oligopolistic market.
Pakistan can influence world prices, and now must use strategic
considerations to decide on its supply. The demand curve would not be
suitably modelled as a demand for Pakistani exports, but as an aggregate
demand for world supply of the good which is being supplied by Pakistan.
Determination of Pakistan's supply would require a deeper analysis
of market structure and the policies of our government in this regard,
as well as the policies of other major suppliers. A simple demand and
supply equation does not seem adequate in this complex case. It seems
likely to me that a sophisticated analysis of this type would be quite
valuable to the Government in determining suitable policies regarding
our exports. If the authors wish to undertake such analysis in the
future, I would suggest that they disaggregate the exports into major
categories. This will make it more possible to get realistic estimates
on the basis of market structure.
Finally, I would like to indicate the Almon's Polynomial
Distributed Lag technique has been virtually abandoned. I know of no
empirical study using this technique published within the last ten
years. The main reason for this is the influence of Hendry's
methodology, described in detail in the important text Dynamic
Econometrics. I will only provide a sketch of his critique here.
Consider Almon's model:
S(t) = a + a0(t) O(t-1) + a1 O(t-1) + a2 O(t-2) + ... + ak O(t-k)
The supply (shipments) at time t is a distributed lag based on
previous orders. This is a special case of the general ARMA (k, k)
model, which would also have lagged variables S(t-1) to S(t-k) on the
right hand side. Hendry makes a strong case for general-to-simple
modelling, which involving starting with the most general ARMA (k, k)
model and then simplifying to special cases. In the Almon model, we
would want to start by putting these omitted variables on the RHS. We
can exclude these variables only after we test the coefficients of the
shipments and find that the null hypothesis that they are zero cannot be
rejected. In fact, I asked a graduate student to carry out this exercise
with the Almon data, and found that this null is strongly rejected. On
reflection, it is clear that lagged values of shipments are very
important variables. It is the UNFILLED orders from the previous periods
which affect current shipments. We found that by putting in lagged
shipments, we could construct very simple models which outperformed
Almons best PDL models by large factors of accuracy.
Asad Zaman
International Institute of Islamic Economics, International Islamic
University, Islamabad.
REFERENCES
Ahmed, Naseeruddin (2000) Export Response to Trade Liberalisation
in Bangladesh: A Co-integration Analysis. Applied Economics 32,
1077-1084.
Anwer, Sajjad (1985) Export Function for Pakistan: A Simultaneous
Equation Approach. Pakistan Journal of Applied Economics 4:1, 29-34.
Goldar, Bishwanath (1989) Determinants of India's Export
Performance in Engineering Products, 1960-79. Developing Economics 27:1.
Hasan, M. Aynul, and Ashfaque H. Khan (1994) Impact of Devaluation
on Pakistan's External Trade: An Econometric Approach. The Pakistan
Development Review 33:4, 1205-1215.
Houthakker, H. S., and S. P. Magee (1969) Income and Price
Elasticities in World Trade. Review of Economics and Statistics 51:2.
Hausman, J. A. (1976) Specification Tests in Econometrics.
Econometrica 46, 1251-1271.
Khan, Mohsin S., and M. Goldstein (1978) The Supply and Demand for
Exports: A Simultaneous Approach. Review of Economics and Statistics
May: 257-286.
Naqvi, S. N. H., et al. (1983) The P. I. D. E Macro Econometric
Model of Pakistan's Economy. Islamabad: Pakistan Institute of
Development Economics.
Rohmberg, Robert R. (1976) Indices of Effective Exchange Rages.
Staff Papers 23, 88-112.
Roy, Dilip Kumar (1991) Determination of Export Performance of
Bangladesh. The Bangladesh Development Studies 19:4.
Sajjad, and Fauzia (2000) Pakistan Trade Performance via-h-via its
Major Trading Partner. 1, 37-50.
Taylor, L. (1990) Socially Relevant Policy Analysis: Structuralist
Compatible General Equilibrium Models for Developing Countries.
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Trap, F. (1993) Stabilisation and Structural Adjustment:
Macroeconomic Frameworks for Analysing Sub-Saharan Africa. London:
Routlege
(1) Almon technique has a distinct advantage over the Koyck method
because the latter has some serious estimation nrnhlems. Moreover Koyck
will not work when assumption of [beta] coefficient decline,
(2) Different studies used different types of exchange rates
(nominal, real, and effective).
(3) Industrial production index of industrial countries is taken as
a proxy of world economic activity because more than 60 percent of
export of Pakistan goes to industrial countries.
(4) Wage rate as proxy of cost of production is first time used in
export supply equation of Pakistan.
(5) We check the simultaneity problem between export demand and
supply equation by employing Huasman Specification Test. We found that
there is no simultaneous problem exists between export demand and supply
equations.
(6) The number of lags included was determined using Akaike
Information Criteria (AIC), indicating that optimal lag is 3.
(7) Share of export of trade partner more than 1 percent in total
export in 1990.
(8) Estimation procedure of real effective exchange rate and
production capacity of economy is given in Appendix.
Zeshan Atique is Faculty Member, Shaheed Zulfikar Ali Bhutto Institute of Science and Technology, Karachi, and Lecturer in Economics
at the University of Karachi, Karachi. Mohsin Hasnain Ahmad is Project
Economist, Applied Economics Research Centre, University of Karachi,
Karachi.
The Export Demand Equation
Lagged Explanatory Estimated
Variables Coefficient T-Ratio
Constant -6.86 -4.26 *
REER (0) -0.49 -1.57
REER (-1) -0.36 -1.49
REER (-2) -0.53 -1.07
REER (-3) -0.03 -0.01
IPI (0) 0.38 2.47 **
IPI (-1) 0.69 2.24 **
IPI (-2) 0.68 2.27 **
IPI (-3) 1.58 1.77
[3.summation over (i=0)] REER(i) -0.39 -2.12 **
[3.summation over (i=0)] IPI (i) 2.93 12.3 *
Adjusted [R.sup.2] 0.92
D.W 2.06
* and ** indicate significant at 1 percent and 5 percent respectively.
The Export Supply Equation
Explanatory Estimated
Variables Coefficient T-Ratio
Constant -37.51 -5.16 *
LRP 0.42 0.99
LY 3.67 4.97
Wr (0) -0.25 -1.29
Wr (-1) -0.05 -1.43
Wr (-2) -0.08 -0.52
Wr (-3) -0.31 -1.58
[3.summation over (i=0)] REER(i) -0.70 -2.56 *
Adjusted [R.sup.2] 0.92
D.W 2.13
* and ** indicate significant at 1 percent and 5 percent respectively.