Selected correlates of morbidity in Pakistan.
Khan, Zubeda
INTRODUCTION
The study of morbidity from the point of view of demographic
analysis refers to the incidence and prevalence of sickness in the
population during a certain reference period. Morbidity being the state
of condition from which people may return to normal health or, subject
to the seriousness of illness, may in some cases die. Though from the
point of view of medical discipline any deviation from normal health
i.e. a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being, is of
direct concern for research. The morbidity statistics for which data
have become available for a national level statistical or demographic
analysis, refers to inability to perform the usual daily routine,
inability to take normal food and requiring bed rest for a specific
period of time.
BACKGROUND
According to the 1981 census, the population of Pakistan was 84.25
million, with 44.23 million males and 40.02 million females. Among the
four provinces of Pakistan, Punjab had 58.6 percent (Table 1) of the
total population, followed by Sindh with 23.5 percent, N.W.F.P. with
12.5 percent, and Balochistan with 5.4 percent. A large proportion of
the population is young, 44.5 percent under 15 years of age, (Table 2)
statistics which are reflective of a high birth rate and is also at
least particularly responsible for keeping the proportion of population
in the age bracket of 60 and over to the 7 percent. The literacy ratio,
one of the lowest among the developing nations of the Asian region,
stands at 26.2 percent, the figure for males being 35 percent and for
females 16 percent. There is, as expected, a higher level of literacy in
urban as opposed to rural areas. The literacy figures for males and
females in urban areas are 55 percent and 35 percent respectively, while
in the rural areas only 26 percent of males and 7 percent of females are
literate. Table 3 shows the figures for literacy ratio for persons 10 +
years by sex, urban/rural residence of Provinces of Pakistan.
In July 1990, the population of Pakistan was estimated at 112
million with a high birth rate of 42.3, comparatively low mortality rate
of 11.1, and an infant mortality rate of 80 per 1000 live births. Life
expectancy stood at 61 years.
The number of hospitals in the country as of 1st January 1989 was
717, and the population covered per hospital was 156,206. However, only
18 percent (130) of the hospitals were in the rural areas which contain
the bulk of Pakistan's population. The number of total primary
health care facilities in the country was 8,503, the urban areas having
2,247 such facilities, and the rural areas having 6,556. The population
covered by each primary facility is 12,722 persons.
Morbidity has not yet received the same amount of attention for
research as mortality. In most developing countries, morbidity
statistics are either not available or inadequate. Hospitalisation
records often refer to Government hospitals only, and even for them
causes of morbidity are recorded only for patients who died or were
attended to during terminal illness by a physician. Urban people are
more likely to seek hospital treatment due to relatively easier access
to them, or because more people have the resources for hospitalisation.
A child whose life is saved is returned to the environment in which
poverty, lack of adequate housing, sub-standard sanitation facilities,
and absence of proper drinking water, may collectively or individually
has chances of catching the infection again. Studies in Pakistan show
higher infant mortality and crude death rates in the rural areas due to
the above-mentioned problems. Other reasons for the afore-mentioned
risks are congenital anomalies, birth injuries, and pre-natal causes.
Children under five are extremely susceptible to catching various
diseases and as such need proper health and medical services. Diarrhoea is the major cause of illness among young children. The WHO estimates
that there are three-quarters of a billion cases of diarrhoea among
children of developing nations each year, resulting in nearly five
million fatalities [Synder and Merson (1982)].
CORRELATES OF MORBIDITY
Morbidity depends on a number of factors related to the surrounding
environment, availability of basic facilities, the demographic and
socio-economic characteristics of the people, and access to health,
medical, and social facilities. Isolated and fragmented information can
be obtained from hospitalisation records, but it is unrepresentative of
the conditions of people.
To compensate for the lack of data, a National Health Survey was
conducted in 1982-83. The survey provided information at National and
Provincial levels and was classified on urban and rural basis. The
survey provided information on all the correlates of morbidity, and was
based on the prevalence of morbidity for a period of one month uptil the
day of survey. The curative measures taken by sick persons and
expenditures on hospitalisation and treatment were also recorded.
Literacy, especially that of mothers plays a vital role in
controlling morbidity. There is a vast difference in the levels of
morbidity between the urban and rural areas as shown in Table 4.
Majority of the morbidity cases are reported among children upto four
years old (Table 5). Morbidity further rises among babies under one, and
is highest in the first six months. Male children have a higher risk of
morbidity then female children, a pattern which occurs in most
countries. This gender difference in morbidity rates reverses itself for
people with ages between 20-54 years mainly due to this being the
females reproductive cycle. In this period, female fatalities are higher
in developing nations due to inadequate delivery systems.
Morbidity also varies by marital status (Table 6). Married people
both male and female, have higher incidence of morbidity. Widowers have
the highest morbidity rates, primarily because they do not have their
spouses to take care of them. The above patterns hold true for three out
of four provinces of Pakistan while there might be under reporting in
Balochistan.
The biggest cause of morbidity in Pakistan is Malaria (41 percent)
(Table 7) which includes other fevers also. This is true among both
urban and rural areas, and also males and females. This is followed by
the common cold and respiratory diseases with influenza also being quite
common in Pakistan. Among children, the leading causes of morbidity were
diarrhoea, dysentery, and other disorders of gastrointestinal system.
Next in frequency were respiratory diseases followed by fever. In
Balochistan, there are a high number of morbidity cases among children
due to measles and polio, while in N.W.F.P. children suffer to a high
degree from tetanus.
Analysis of morbidity in relation to occupation of the patient
(Table 8) shows that people working in the agricultural sector have the
highest rate of morbidity as they work in rural areas where health and
sanitary conditions are the worst, and medical facilities least
available. Incidentally this is the area in which the largest proportion
of Pakistanis are working. The group with the next highest level of
morbidity is that of people connected with the retail trade such as
small shopkeepers and salesmen. Technical and other types of skilled
workers also have a high morbidity rate. Professionals have the lowest
morbidity rate by occupation. They are often highly educated, live in
large cities, and have access to most of the requisite health and
medical facilities.
In urban areas, 41 percent (Table 9) of sick people seek treatment
at private clinics while in rural areas 21 percent do so. In rural
areas, as access to doctors, as well as hospitals and clinics is not
easy, around 17-18 percent people seek help with compounders
(pharmacists) while only 7 percent people in urban areas utilise
compounders. Similarly, in rural areas a sizeable number of people 14-15
percent get treatment from Hakims (Homeopathic doctors) while only 4
percent of urbanites go to Hakims. In Balochistan, the proportion of
people being hopitalised is the highest inspite of the fact that it is
the least developed province of Pakistan (Table 10). This is so because
of the very low density of population which improves the doctor to
patient and hospital to patient ratio.
As shown in Table 11, there are a few amenities, the availability
of which ensures to a great extent the provision of good health. These
are Pucca (Concrete) housing, piped water, gas for cooking, and flush toilets. People who lack any or all of these facilities are most prone
to illness. Table 12 shows that migrants of the Medical Institution were
at a for flung distance from the rural areas of Pakistan.
CONCLUSIONS
Although mortality levels declined in the past 40 to 50 years in
Pakistan and in other developing countries, it is more due to the
effectiveness of modern medicine for reducing the termination of life by
death, and not primarily due to the control of the incidence of disease.
The conditions of high fertility and declining mortality have
contributed to a fast growth in population under the conditions of low
literacy specially among women, inadequate health facilities and limited
financial resources for the majority of the population. Such conditions
along with unhealthy environmental factors are favourable to the chances
of becoming ill.
Fever has been identified as a major cause of sickness (41 percent)
which is followed by digestive disorder (8 percent) and respiratory
disorders (6 percent). Maximum sickness was registered in rural areas
having the poorest sanitary conditions.
Low educational levels, poor hygienic status of the families, poor
environmental sanitation and low per capita income are important
correlates of morbidity. Also a low level of health status is due to
overcrowded houses, poor environmental sanitation, lack of education,
and unemployment in youth.
The improvement in socio-economic conditions, education and
awareness among the people, provision of health and sanitary facilities,
both in rural and urban areas will help to limit the incidence of
morbidity, which will contribute not only to further lowering of the
mortality but also improve the productivity of the available manpower.
It is also suggested that health surveys on morbidity and other related
factors should be a regular feature of the statistical activity in
Pakistan. Also the available data need further in-depth analysis to look
at various aspects of morbidity.
Comments on "Selected Correlates of Morbidity in
Pakistan"
Since the initiation of Pakistan's Family Planning Programme
all efforts of research have been directed towards on examination of
fertility levels and their determinants. As mortality has declined
countinuously, little attention has focussed on mortality research in
the country. This was due to the fact that no specialised mortality
surveys had been undertaken in the country and as such all the research
in this direction has been based on questions on deaths asked in
demographic and fertility surveys. Similarly, as pointed out by the
author there is a dearth of morbidity data from hospital records and no
attempt has been made from the concerned departments to collect data on
morbidity at national or regional level.
It has been only in the recent past that the Federal Bureau of
Statistics, Government of Pakistan has undertaken a National Health
Survey and has also asked questions on causes of death in the 1984-88
Pakistan Demographic Surveys. The author needs to be congratulated on
initiating research on morbidity in Pakistan and it is expected that
similar efforts will be continued in the future.
Although the author has analysed the morbidity data in detail yet
the purpose of this presentation is to throw some more light on the
available data. For instance, the morbidity rates are higher for females
in the urban areas of the four provinces with the reverse phenomenon
being observed in the rural areas. This is probably due to the fact that
most of the urban women remain confined in their homes which are mostly
located in congested areas and Katchi Abadis whereas rural women work
both inside and outside the household and remain physically fit. It is
worth noting that the curve of the morbidity rate is an inverted U-shape
like the mortality curve, tending to indicate that morbidity and
mortality are closely related with age. Further, another interesting
aspect of the age curve of morbidity is that morbidity is higher for
males in the age range 0-10 years, lower for males in the age range
15-55 years and higher for males beyond age 55. Although the morbidity
rates for male children are higher yet female children still experience
excessive mortality over male children. Is it because parents incur more
expenses on the care of sons and if is so then Zeba Sathar's
hypothesis of the neglect of female children gains recognition in the
present case. Further, higher female morbidity in the reproductive ages
is indicative of high maternal mortality in Pakistan. Higher male
morbidity beyond age 55-59 is indicative of the fact that male mortality
at advanced ages tends to remain higher as compared to female mortality.
Furthermore the data shows that morbidity rates for married males
and females are higher than that of never married males and females. In
fact the reverse should be the case here. It is suggested that morbidity
rates for never married persons should be split up among children adults
and aged persons.
Another interesting feature of the results are that only about 16
percent (18 Million) of the population of Pakistan is provided health
care facilities by the Ministry of Health. On the other hand, only 15 to
20 percent of the population of Pakistan is covered by the family
planning programme facilities which also provide maternal and child
health care. Only about 13 percent of the urban population and 16
percent of rural population has access to government health facilities.
The rural population as compared to the urban population utilises
private health facilities to a much lesser extent probably because these
services are quite expensive and as such the rural population tend to
utilise less expensive treatment of Hakims, Homeopaths and Compounders.
As the National Health Survey is based on a national probability
sample and since Balochistan represents only 5 percent of the total
population, care should be taken to interpret the Balochistan figures.
In the end it is worthwhile to note that the rural sample
population in the survey indicates the extent of accessibility of health
facilities. For instance about 88 percent of the population has to
travel 5 or more kilometres to reach the hospital, 33 percent of the
population has to cover 5 or more kilometres to reach a dispensary, 28
percent has to cover 5 or more kilometres to reach M.C.H. Centres. In
addition, 63 percent of the population has to travel 5 or more
kilometres to reach a rural health center, 47 percent to reach a rural
health sub-centre and 46 percent to reach a private clinic.
M. Naseem Iqbal Farooqui
National Institute of Population Studies, Islamabad.
REFERENCE
Snyder, John D., and Michael H. Merson (1982). The Magnitude of the
Global Problem of Acute Diarrhoeal Disease: A Review of Active
Surveillance Data. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 60:
605-613.
Zubeda Khan is Senior Research Demographer at the Pakistan
Institute of Development Economics, Islamabad.
Table 1
Percentage Distribution of Population by Urban-Rural
Residence-Provinces-Census, National Health
Survey And Pakistan Demographic Survey
Census/Survey Punjab Sindh NWFP Balochistan
1981 Census
All Areas 58.6 23.5 12.5 5.4
Urban 55.4 34.8 6.9 2.9
Rural 59.9 18.9 14.8 6.4
National Health
Survey 1982-83
All Areas 64.2 21.0 10.8 4.1
Urban 56.2 34.9 6.2 2.7
Rural 67.3 15.6 12.6 4.6
Pakistan Demographic
Survey 1988
All Areas 60.2 23.4 12.9 3.5
Urban 55.6 36.1 6.6 1.6
Rural 62.3 17.4 15.8 4.4
Table 2
Percentage Distribution: by Age and Sex
Census, NHS and DHS, Pakistan
Census 1981 NHS 1982-83 DHS 1988
Age
Group Male Female Male Female Male Female
0-4 14.3 14.6 16.1 16.5 15.8 16.8
5-9 15.8 17.0 17.0 16.2 16.5 16.6
10-14 13.7 13.3 13.4 12.6 12.6 12.7
15-24 17.4 17.5 17.8 17.0 17.0 17.8
25-34 12.3 10.4 11.5 12.3 12.4 12.6
35-44 9.4 9.3 8.5 10.2 9.9 9.0
45-59 9.5 10.3 11.1 9.0 9.8 8.9
60+ 7.6 7.6 6.8 6.1 5.9 5.6
Total 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
Table 3
Literacy Ratios for Persons of 10+ Years By Sex, Urban/Rural
Residence--Pakistan and Province--NHS
Locality Both Sexes Male Female
Pakistan
All Areas 31.8 44.9 17.6
Urban 52.8 64.5 39.9
Rural 23.4 36.9 8.7
Punjab
All Areas 31.5 44.2 18.1
Urban 52.3 63.1 40.4
Rural 24.6 37.7 10.8
Sindh
All Areas 37.4 50.0 22.7
Urban 55.9 67.8 42.3
Rural 20.5 34.1 4.3
N.W.F.P.
All Areas 26.7 43.5 8.7
Urban 44.5 59.3 28.7
Rural 23.1 40.4 4.7
Balochistan
All Areas 20.5 32.6 6.5
Urban 43.8 60.6 23.6
Rural 14.9 25.7 2.6
Excludes FATA from N.W.F.P.
Table 4
Morbidity Rates for Pakistan and Provinces, by Sex and
Urban/Rural Residence--NHS
Locality All Areas Urban Rural
Pakistan
Both Sexes 171.2 143.1 182.3
Male 171.9 138.2 185.2
Female 170.5 148.4 179.1
Punjab
Both Sexes 177.3 144.5 188.0
Male 180.5 137.9 194.6
Female 173.8 151.6 180.9
Sindh
Both Sexes 150.0 136.1 162.1
Male 147.5 134.9 158.4
Female 152.7 137.5 166.3
N.W.F.P.
Both Sexes 204.4 195.5 206.1
Male 199.6 186.4 202.0
Female 209.6 205.2 210.4
Balochistan
Both Sexes 98.7 85.0 101.9
Male 91.5 78.3 94.6
Female 106.5 92.7 109.6
Table 5
Age-specific Morbidity Rate by Sex
Age-specific Morbidity Rates
(Per 1000 Persons)
Age Group Both Sexes Male Female
All Ages 171.2 171.9 170.5
0-4 Years 230.5 258.8 208.3
5-9 Years 144.8 153.9 134.7
10-14 Years 104.2 112.3 95.0
15-19 Years 105.0 102.8 107.6
20-4 Years 112.0 102.0 122.2
25-29 Years 135.4 120.5 149.5
30-34 Years 154.5 141.9 165.4
35-39 Years 166.9 138.3 196.3
40-44 Years 190.5 157.3 223.8
45-49 Years 217.8 191.1 247.3
50-54 Years 232.2 213.9 253.7
55-59 Years 245.4 250.7 239.7
60-64 Years 296.3 291.3 303.6
65 and Above 372.6 391.8 346.6
Table 6
Morbidity Rates by Marital Status; Sex and Provinces
Morbidity Rates (Per 1000 Persons)
Pakistan Punjab
Marital
Status Male Female Male Female
All Areas 171.9 170.5 180.5 173.8
Never Married 152.2 145.2 162.9 147.9
Married 189.3 183.3 200.0 189.4
Widowed 333.1 350.6 334.6 342.9
Urban Areas 138.2 78.3 137.9 151.6
Never Married 123.8 123.1 123.7 124.4
Married 156.8 170.4 158.4 180.0
Widowed 261.2 277.5 227.2 266.3
Rural Areas 185.2 179.1 194.6 180.9
Never Married 168.0 154.6 176.5 156.1
Married 201.5 187.8 212.2 192.2
Widowed 356.6 382.3 364.6 370.2
Sindh N.W.F.P.
Marital
Status Male Female Male Female
All Areas 147.5 152.7 199.5 209.6
Never Married 132.8 133.6 174.8 166.0
Married 158.7 157.8 233.9 234.0
Widowed 317.6 307.3 418.7 500.0
Urban Areas 134.9 137.5 186.4 205.2
Never Married 122.2 117.0 162.9 167.6
Married 148.2 150.8 218.6 227.2
Widowed 303.2 254.2 334.9 518.7
Rural Areas 158.4 166.3 202.0 210.4
Never Married 142.9 150.7 176.9 165.6
Married 166.8 162.8 237.0 235.2
Widowed 326.8 361.3 436.6 496.6
Balochistan
Marital
Status Male Female
All Areas 91.5 106.5
Never Married 88.7 104.2
Married 92.8 90.7
Widowed 151.6 291.3
Urban Areas 148.4 92.7
Never Married 58.9 65.9
Married 100.9 96.5
Widowed 348.1 326.4
Rural Areas 94.6 109.5
Never Married 96.3 113.1
Married 91.1 89.5
Widowed 114.4 279.9
Table 7
Percentage Distribution of Sick Persons by Sex Selected
Diseases and Urban/Rural Residence
Both Areas Urban
Disease Male Female Male Female
Code
01-02 Tuberculoses 2.54 2.26 2.27 2.23
05 Dysentery 2.62 1.99 2.96 1.67
06 Other Infective Diseases
Commonly Arising in
Intestinal Tract 3.78 3.13 3.81 2.90
07 Certain Diseases Common
Among Children 3.22 2.97 3.25 3.17
09 Malaria (Includes all
other Fevers) 41.08 39.55 32.72 30.64
14 Allergic Disorders 4.03 2.70 3.69 2.37
16 Diabetes Mellitus 0.80 0.53 0.84 1.07
21 Diseases of Eyes 1.10 1.21 1.43 1.00
24-26 Chronic Rheumatic Hear
Disease, Arteriosclerotic
and Degenerative Heart 1.27 2.75 2.46 4.67
Disease and Hypertensive
Disease
28 Acute Nasopharyngitis 6.76 6.16 9.56 6.71
(Common Cold)
30 Influenza 4.25 3.55 4.42 4.52
31 Pneumonia 1.15 1.42 0.88 1.14
34 All other Respiratory 5.51 4.71 6.68 5.22
Disease
35 Diseases of Stomach and 3.59 4.84 3.75 6.86
Duodenum Except Cancer
40 Other Diseases of 2.25 1.69 1.55 2.03
Digestive System
46 Arthritis and Rheumatism 2.63 3.90 2.50 4.58
Except Rheumatic Fever
50 Accidents, Poisoning, and 1.69 1.07 2.61 0.90
Violence (External Cause)
All other Diseases 11.73 15.57 14.62 19.22
Total 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
Rural
Disease Male Female
Code
01-02 Tuberculoses 2.62 2.27
05 Dysentery 2.52 2.09
06 Other Infective Diseases
Commonly Arising in
Intestinal Tract 3.77 3.49
07 Certain Diseases Common
Among Children 3.21 2.90
09 Malaria (Includes all
other Fevers) 43.53 42.42
14 Allergic Disorders 4.12 2.80
16 Diabetes Mellitus 0.79 0.35
21 Diseases of Eyes 1.00 1.28
24-26 Chronic Rheumatic Hear
Disease, Arteriosclerotic
and Degenerative Heart 0.91 2.14
Disease and Hypertensive
Disease
28 Acute Nasopharyngitis 5.94 5.98
(Common Cold)
30 Influenza 4.20 3.23
31 Pneumonia 1.23 1.51
34 All other Respiratory 5.16 4.55
Disease
35 Diseases of Stomach and 3.55 4.19
Duodenum Except Cancer
40 Other Diseases of 2.46 1.58
Digestive System
46 Arthritis and Rheumatism 2.66 3.68
Except Rheumatic Fever
50 Accidents, Poisoning, and 1.42 1.12
Violence (External Cause)
All other Diseases 10.91 14.42
Total 100.00 100.00
Table 8
Morbidity Rates by Major Occupation Groups, Pakistan
Morbidity Rates (per 1000
Major Occupation Group Employed Persons)
Total 157.8
Professional, Technical and Related
Workers 151.3
Administrative and Managerial Workers 111.9
Clerical and Related Workers 94.8
Sales Workers 162.9
Service Workers 155.5
Agricultural, Animal Husbandry and
Forestry Workers, Fishermen and Hunters 173.1
Production and Related Workers, Transport
Equipment Operators and Labourers 137.6
Workers not Classifiable by Occupation 151.6
Table 9
Percentage Distribution of Sick Persons by Source of
Treatment Received Urban/Rural Residence for Pakistan
Both Areas
Source of Both
Treatment Sexes Male Female
1. Government Hospital/
Dispensary/Rural Health
Centre/Sub-Centre 15.66 14.80 16.41
2. Private Hospital/ 17.73 18.13 17.70
Dispensary
3. Private Clinic 24.92 25.14 25.97
4. Hakim 12.34 12.85 11.13
5. Homeopath 1.23 1.21 1.29
6. Compounder 15.29 14.44 15.55
7. Self Treatment 5.54 5.81 5.14
8. No Treatment 3.11 3.33 2.80
9. Other 1.31 1.44 1.11
10. More than one Source 2.86 2.85 2.88
Total 100.00 100.00 100.00
Urban Areas
Source of Both
Treatment Sexes Male Female
1. Government Hospital/
Dispensary/Rural Health
Centre/Sub-Centre 13.45 12.55 14.36
2. Private Hospital/ 22.55 23.99 21.09
Dispensary
3. Private Clinic 40.66 39.81 41.52
4. Hakim 4.29 4.68 3.89
5. Homeopath 1.66 1.34 1.99
6. Compounder 7.01 6.46 7.56
7. Self Treatment 4.22 4.83 3.62
8. No Treatment 2.20 2.46 1.94
9. Other 0.75 0.83 0.67
10. More than one Source 3.21 3.05 3.38
Total 100.00 100.00 100.00
Rural Areas
Source of Both
Treatment Sexes Male Female
1. Government Hospital/
Dispensary/Rural Health
Centre/Sub-Centre 16.23 15.47 17.08
2. Private Hospital/ 16.50 16.41 16.60
Dispensary
3. Private Clinic 20.88 20.88 20.95
4. Hakim 14.41 15.25 13.47
5. Homeopath 1.12 1.18 1.06
6. Compounder 17.42 16.78 18.12
7. Self Treatment 5.88 6.10 5.64
8. No Treatment 3.35 3.59 3.08
9. Other 1.45 1.63 1.26
10. More than one Source 2.76 2.76 2.74
Total 100.00 100.00 100.00
Table 10
Percentage of Sick Persons Hospitalised (1st Sickness) by Sex
and Urban/Rural Residence Pakistan and Provinces-NHS 1982-83
All Areas
Both
Area Sexes Male Female
Pakistan 3.69 3.57 3.83
Punjab 2.77 2.75 2.79
Sindh 5.97 5.46 6.52
N.W.F.P. 4.96 4.93 4.99
Balochistan 5.06 5.33 4.82
Urban
Both
Area Sexes Male Female
Pakistan 3.89 3.53 4.25
Punjab 2.76 2.68 2.84
Sindh 5.25 4.20 6.37
N.W.F.P. 4.79 5.38 4.21
Balochistan 10.91 9.52 12.24
Rural
Both
Area Sexes Male Female
Pakistan 3.63 3.58 3.69
Punjab 2.77 2.76 2.78
Sindh 6.50 6.38 6.62
N.W.F.P. 5.00 4.86 5.14
Balochistan 3.94 4.51 3.43
Table 11
Morbidity Rates by Type of Construction and Housing
Facilities by Urban/Rural Residence
Morbidity Rates (Per
1000 Persons)
Type of Construction/
Housing Facilities All Areas Urban Rural
A. Type of Construction
1. Pucca 155.4 133.8 186.9
2. Others 177.7 157.8 181.4
B. Source of Main Drinking Water
1. Piped Water 155.6 147.6 178.7
2. Well/Hand Pump 178.3 139.7 186.8
3. Others 161.4 121.2 165.3
C. Type of Cooking Fuel
1. Gas/Biogas/Electricity 135.8 135.8 135.9
2. Cow-dung and Wood/Other 161.3 147.2 226.3
3. Kerosene Oil 176.5 147.5 182.2
D. Type of Toilet
1. Flush 142.0 136.7 216.3
2. Without Flush 146.6 141.4 155.7
3. Closed Pit/Open Space 183.0 159.1 185.0
Table 12
Distribution of Rural Sample Areas by Distance from Different
Categories of Medical Institutions, Pakistan
Less than
one
Kilometer
or within
Medical the Sample 1-2 3-5
Institution Area Kilometer Kilometer
Hospital 1.4 3.6 6.6
Dispensary 14.8 8.2 19.2
Maternity and Child 6.5 4.9 11.0
Health Centre
Rural Health Centre 11.6 7.8 17.7
Rural Health Sub-Centre 21.7 9.8 21.3
Private Clinic 28.2 8.7 17.3
More
Medical 6-10 than 10
Institution Kilometer Kilometer
Hospital 18.9 69.5
Dispensary 26.1 31.7
Maternity and Child 21.2 56.4
Health Centre
Rural Health Centre 27.1 35.9
Rural Health Sub-Centre 22.9 24.2
Private Clinic 20.8 25.1