Gringo/a as sociolinguistic fractal.
Kane, Stephanie C. ; Klein, Harriet E. Manelis
Pour les anthropologues qui effectuent leur travail de terrain en
Amerique latine, le terme polysemique << gringo >> traduit
inevitablement un processus de negociation de l'identite
culturelle. En s'appuyant sur les experiences d'interactions
des auteurs dans la poursuite de leurs objectifs professionnels, cette
article montre comment la nation, la religion, le sexe, la race, de meme
l'histoire de la colonisation, de la migration, et des alliances
emergent et s'estompent dans les rencontres kaleidoscopiques entre
des stereotypes hemispheriques et des voyageurs interculturels. Les
recits entrelaces de l'experience personnelle du <<
gringo-hood >> que nous presentons revelent le caractere fractal
de la connaissance et de l'experience. Cet article montre ainsi
comment les interactions linguistiques, culturelles, et surtout
folkloriques traduisent differentes dimensions de nos experiences
socialement situees, de meme que les differentes formes de discours que
nous avons croises.
The polysemic term "gringo" inevitably mediates the
negotiation of cultural identity for anthropologists carrying out
fieldwork in Latin America. Drawing on experiences from the
authors' interactions in pursuit of professional goals, this
analysis shows how nation, religion, gender, race, and the histories of
colonization, migration, and alliance emerge and recede in kaleidoscopic
encounters between hemispheric stereotypes and cross-cultural travelers.
The intertwined personal experience narratives of
'gringo-hood' we present reveal the fractal character of
knowledge and experience. This article, therefore, shows how linguistic,
cultural, and especially folkloric interactions mediate the various
dimensions of our socially situated experiences and the different forms
of talk we encountered.
Introduction
Gringo is a polysemic term that anchors gender and orients toward a
mythic historical relationship of unequal power between nations and
regions. Its semantic domain precedes any individual ethnographer
entering the field and is generally activated (even if the term is not
used explicitly) when the ethnographer has left a home base in the
northern hemisphere and is moving through ethnographic sites in the
southern hemisphere. The projection of the term onto individuals,
freighted as it is with derogatory associations, often produces dismay
or frustration in the person so framed. At first, it may seem unjust
that one is identified with an ideological paradigm that one has devoted
oneself to critiquing. Then, one is forced to come to terms with the
privilege one inhabits by virtue of one's passport, independently
of one's conscious beliefs and actions.
Within its semantic field is the central frame of the United States
as an arrogant regional power. U.S. power is conferred on any
ethnographer who by appearance, language, style, race, or religion
indexes the U.S. to people in Latin America. Yet, in his description of
Mexico after 1775, Americo Paredes (1958: 8-9) indicates how the
disparaging character of the term had already become quite divorced even
from the personal appearance of speakers:
In succeeding generations the Indians, who began as vaqueros
and sheepherders for the colonists, were absorbed into the blood
and the culture of the Spanish settlers. Also absorbed into the
basically Spanish culture were many non-Spanish Europeans, so
that on the Border one finds men who prefer Spanish to English,
who sometimes talk scornfully about the "Gringos," and who bear
English, Scottish, Irish, or other non-Spanish names.
Although the position or perspective of those who use or experience
the word can be subtle, in contemporary parlance, the gringo referent
usually includes Canadians, Australians, Europeans, mostly white,
Christian, English speakers who come from somewhere else with some money
to spend. In short, the diversity of human categories in its embrace
contrasts with the term's homogenizing force. In use, however, the
homogenizing force is clearly split by gender. Adams (1999: 114) defines
gringa uniquely as:
[A] figure found throughout Latin America, whose dark powers
derive from the unstable intersection of the North/South hierarchy
with the power relationship of the male/female hierarchies. The
gringa embodies exclusive boundaries, and, at the same time, the
tantalizing possibilities of border crossing alliances.
As we consider the meaning of gringo/a through our fieldwork
experience, we find also that religion, or more particularly our Jewish
cultural identity, inevitably inserted into a Christian-inflected
religious frame, also becomes key to disrupting the term's
operation in any given cultural exchange. By making our
Jewish-gringa-fieldworker selves an object of analysis, we reveal how
the process by which mythic qualities of the gringo/a intertwine with
our personal experience, and hence our fieldwork narratives. Our aim is
to show how the manner and effects of this intertwining are
sociolinguistically complicated by gender, ethnic and religious
identity. (1) And so the word gringo/a mediates our relationships and
our stories, changing shape and meaning even as it renders gringo-hood
anew. Looking back, we see ourselves moving through a Latin American
landscape of sociolinguistic fractals. We propose that the fractal
pattern of language produced through a uniquely powerful word has
implications for thinking anew about the dynamics of and variations in
folklore texts and their collection. In addition, this essay contributes
to the folklore of fieldwork, as carried out by folklorists or
anthropologists (Reuss 1974).
The Power of Language
Gringo is a word. It is a living organism which grows, changes
shape and significance as it is used, influencing the universe in which
it is spoken. This word is capable of simultaneously producing multiple
variations while maintaining its basic lexemic shape. As a result the
word "gringo" is always recognizable.
Approaching gringo-hood in terms of language as we do can only be
understood in the context of culture contact, a process that intensifies
with globalization. The nature of the contact and the contrast can vary
enormously, but most of it is verbal, part of a speech event. As
anthropologists, our experience of and with this term is not the same as
authors, journalists, or visiting lecturers; it is not so much about
shunning behavior. The term varies in its use (and implications)
depending on the ideologies of those in contact and the space of social
interaction. Yet gringo-hood is always symbolic of a type of otherness
that is conceptualized in terms of a spatialized (north/south) contrast.
Spatial patterns in nature triggered Mandelbrot's (1977)
conceptualization of non-geometric families of shapes as fractals
--irregular and fragmented forms that are oddly consistent in their
repetition across scales (in this sense, fractal contrasts with modular
design). (2) We apply the fractal concept to gringo-hood because it
changes shape as we move in and out of membership in a variety of social
categories and groups. Interestingly, the word "gringo" by
itself is not concrete as a beach, a snowflake or a leaf might be; yet
it becomes real through the power of language.
In studying the word's power, we find that spoken contrast, or
distinction between gringo and not-gringo, or gringo/a, actually
projects an opposition that may be salient at different levels of
relationship (Irvine and Gal 2000: 38 cited in Gal 2005). In other
words, it is a fractal:
... [a] distinction that can be reproduced repeatedly by projecting
it onto narrower or broader comparisons. Fractal recursions are
repetitions of the same contrast but at different scales ... With each
recursion, one changes the perspective of the viewer/interpreter and
hence the scope of comparison (Gal 2005: 27).
We link this elaboration of the fractal character of gringo
identity formation to foundational work in anthropological linguistics.
For example, Paul Kroskrity (2001: 106) noted, "Identities may be
linguistically constructed both through the use of particular language
and linguistic forms ... associated with specific national, ethnic, or
other identities." We can also define ourselves as Penelope Eckert
and Sally McConnell-Ginet (1992) did by noting that we participate in
communities that are composed of individuals who are temporarily unified
through shared participation in fieldwork activities and thus we are
able to shift our identities as researchers, females, Jewish women, and
non-Latinas from moment to moment. In linguistic terms, this means that
we continue to define the boundaries of words included in, and excluded
from, our shared identity complex: gringos/gringas/Jews/field
researchers.
A Note on Method: Linking Words to Fractals in Folklore
In Myth and Meaning, Levi-Strauss (1979: 39-41) analyzes the
quality of repetition or redundancy in stories of a clan's past;
his analysis foreshadows the way we discuss the fractal character of
gringo/a vignettes that are at once social history and myth:
"This, of course, could be a historical event, but if we look
closely at the way it is explained, we see that the type of event is the
same, but not exactly the details.... So, you see, we have an
explanatory cell. Its basic structure is the same, but the content of
the cell is not the same and can vary; so it is a kind of mini-myth if I
may say so, because it is very short and very condensed, but it has
still the property of a myth in that we can observe it under different
transformations. When one element is transformed, then the other
elements should be rearranged accordingly."
We build on Levi-Strauss's method of structural analysis of
myth and history, while opening it to "the structure of
conjuncture" (Marshall Sahlins 1981: 68) characteristic of the
imperial north-south confrontations encoded in the gringo/a term. Each
one of our personal experience narratives are both
"mini-myths" and explanatory cells that allow us to explore
the kinds of negotiations we engage in when we are labeled and treated
as gringas, paying particular attention to the reflexive politicization
of our persons.
In some cultural locations, the word 'gringo/a' releases
a not-quite-human, supernatural figment of social imagination. Rising
vampirically from a ripped and bloodied semantic terrain, its criminally
arrogant smile-grimace supports a long waxed curl of blond mustache
evoking both cipher and cliche. Of course, individuals fit more or less
easily into the cliche. For example, as Caucasian women, neither of us
have mustaches; Kane is blondish whereas Klein is dark haired. We are
academically different generations and at the time of the early
fieldwork episodes, Kane was single while Klein was married with
children. From our memories of years past, we pull vignettes that
represent a series of negotiations with perceptions of gringo/a-hood.
Part of a fractal experience, Kane and Klein's co-authorship
has an academic origin story which then evolved through a series of
migrations and alliances. They met in 1983 at a linguistic anthropology
conference on Native South American Discourse at the University of Texas
at Austin, and then informally at a party Vera Mark organized to
introduce Klein to a small group of women graduate students. For Kane
and Klein, their mutual interest in Latin America, in fun and laughter
and food and guys, and being Jewish gringa anthropologists, has kept
their intellectual pursuits from being overly cerebral.
The narrative cores, or scripts, capture interactions that are
clear in our minds either because we repeated them in oral retelling or
because they were simply too strange to forget. Although some
experiences appear in fieldnotes and correspondence, for the most part
they have been left out of published writings. The folklore figures in
the narrative cores are ourselves as seen by those we studied, by those
whom we were trying to get permission to study, or those with whom we
serendipitously came into contact. Even in reflexive modes, in the
fullness of our other formal writing, we excluded most of this gringa
material as either anomalous or supplementary to our main foci, more
autobiographical than ethnographic or linguistic. Here, however, the
autobiographical character of the material allows us to trace shifting
contexts over long time periods and wide transnational terrain. We
organize the small corpus typologically by communicative function.
We begin with culture brokers who invoke the gringo specter to
block access to research sites or materials, where passage depends on
our skills in spinning, evading, joking or preempting the term. We
contrast and follow the boundary-making and breaking experiences with
experiences of engagement, wherein productive interaction relies on a
more nuanced use (and deepening irrelevance) of personalized gringo-hood
in ways that can mobilize exploratory discussion in
personal/professional networks. The locales are in Brazil, Paraguay,
Panama, Belize and Argentina. Various predicaments and surprises
dramatize gringo-hood as a sociolinguistic fractal, which shift meaning
metaphorically as our gender, ethnic, and anthropological
identity-complex moves in and out of focus and across scales of social
interactions.
Gargoyles and Gatekeepers: Historical Precedents and Animating
Boundaries
1849: "We were hooted and shouted at as we passed through, and
called 'Gringoes'." (3)
1956: "Soon some poor children from the second-class bus
pointed at me and whispered 'Gringa'. (4) ... Restraining my
gringa impatience once more 1 stood and laughed at them." (5)
Gringo/a is like an epithet. It is invoked to simultaneously set
apart different cultural identities and to establish boundaries. While
it can be used to note seemingly neutral childlike distinctions, e.g.,
"She can't possibly understand, she needs to learn 'our
meaning'," spoken-word 'gringo' can, and often does,
emphatically communicate the contempt of colonized for colonizer. Even
while expressively diverse, the label homogenizes political left and
right, offering no distinctions between e.g., peaceniks and CIA
operatives. Even with ironic affection or curiosity, no one likes being
called gringo. The
labeled may succumb to secondary deviance, feeling implicated in
the evils emanating from gringo empire. (6) Once the name is spoken, the
listener named, the receiver has an ethical obligation to recognize its
rude truth and recall--or learn--the brutal history of how our
privileges as U.S. passport bearers were, and continue to be,
established.
The gringo figure rode out of the violent history of Mexican-U.S.
relations. Yet Kane remembers hearing it first from a fellow traveler
riding a bus through Afghanistan in 1973, where it mysteriously casts
suspicion on naive adventure. Most commonly, however, gringo emerges in
social interactional settings including Central and South American
inhabitants and Anglo-seeming foreigners. Klein recalls hearing it early
in her first Latin American experience living in Bolivia.
National Identity
Klein 1961 Bolivia
As I was crossing a street probably in a way similar to the way
New Yorkers cross streets, a man yelled "gringa" at me. Not to let
on that I was indeed a gringa, I cursed him in Arabic, utilizing
language my father had accidentally provided me with when I was
growing up in a multilingual household. I was told that Arabic
curses are wonderfully descriptive and can rarely be understood,
especially when said by women who are not expected to know that
form of verbal behavior.
The utterance 'gringo/a' is a speech act, meant to warn,
contain, or mock. Like a chick from its shell, one must crack out of the
category inscribed on one's person to communicate properly. It
forces labeled persons to come to terms with the imperialist crimes that
historically underpin our comforts, our ability as anthropologists, for
example, to temporarily exile ourselves as a form of professional
activity. Coming to terms with/as a gringo may be an appropriate
starting point for sincere conversation; in other registers, cracking
through a gringo shell requires some trickery, like aiming a joke at a
cultural fault line. As real persons labeled gringos move about--doing,
writing, making, inhabiting this name, we improvise discordantly. From
whispered intimacies to disembodied messages zipping around digital
clouds, 'gringo/a' uttered pivots the tracks of inter-cultural
conversation. Spoken-word 'gringo' invokes a parody of
intertwining historical struggles, the strands circling in upon
themselves like a rope in the musty corner of a dimly lit room. (7)
Metaphoric variations of the meanings of gringo-hood can be used
for political advantage or subterfuge. As fieldworkers learn the
implications of gringo variations, they may resituate themselves. The
next vignette signaling nationality will be recognizable to many
readers.
Klein 1970s Argentina
I was told that I was better off putting a Canadian patch on my
backpack than an American one, since that would make me "not
such a bad gringa.
Sex and Gender Identity
As field researchers who have spent most of our careers working in
Central and South America, we have had many opportunities to appreciate
gringo's polysemic power. And yet in truth, we are not gringos but
gringAs, a variant that, at its best, bestows an uncanny ability to slip
in and out of the gendered space within gringo's semantic domain
and, at its worst, traps a person (depending on age and status) in a(n)
(a)sexualized body. Gringas can play on men's desires with benign
powers, annoyance, or danger. But if a gringa is perceived to be lacking
in her context-specific gendered performance, for instance, if she is
perceived to be bestowing sexual favors on non-gringo men from the lower
classes in colonized settings, she is subject to disciplinary gazes,
imputations of whoredom or criminality from moral entrepreneurs. In
other words, crossing out of the gringo category for sex has distinct
repercussions for women and men; women more quickly lose social and
legal privileges accompanying gringo-hood when they don't
appropriately contain desires (Kane 1992, Starr 2003). At best, such
cross-category relationships tend to be dismissed as a form of sexual
tourism. As "gendered enclosure" (Nencel 2001),
cross-categorizations constrain real women and structure the social
imagination more generally. Symbolically, gringas, like blacks, are
constitutive elements in the reproduction of racialized and sexualized
logic.
Not only is the gringa, as image and person, sexualized, but she
can be treated as a he, a she/he shape-shifter (Adams 1999: 121-2), a
marginal male (Shelemay 1991). The gringa can be an object of both
rejection and desire, a pawn, a prostitute, a conquest (Paredes 1978:
197 cited in Eysturoy 1990: 25-6). Klein's experience in Argentina
and Panama splits her bodily rituals from her communicative,
professional self (as, in one way or another, we suppose, we all do).
Klein 1971-1978 Argentina:
My experience, however, was that as a gringa, unlike a local
female, I could have dinner alone in a restaurant in the provinces
and not be considered open to sexual encounters. During my
fieldwork on the Toba language in the Argentine Chaco, I worked
with consultants who lived in small indigenous enclaves situated at
the periphery of semi-urbanized towns. Usually I stayed in small
hotels which served breakfast, but the rest of my meals required me
to find places to eat which served an itinerant clientele. (8)
Klein 1982 Panama:
Another experience, perhaps due to my liminal nature as a married
gringa anthropologist, occurred in my field work among the Neobe
(better known as Guaymi). In 1982 I was teaching a linguistic field
methods course to a group of priests and nuns in a mountainous area
in the province of Tole, Panama. I was considered female when it
came to bodily needs such as bathing or urinating or defecating,
but I was considered part of the male universe when it came to
dining (and imbibing) and housing arrangements.
The next vignette shows how the spoken word gringo perverts an
inter-cultural conversation from money to sex.
Kane 1983 Panama
My first time in the Darien, and I hadn't gone deep in; I stayed
in a village on the road, half Embera and half Wounaan. (9) Shortly
after my arrival, following the advice of the village headman, the
son of the Old Man, I asked if I might accompany him whilst he
collected medicinal plants. We left at dawn the next day. Leaving
the village, we sat at the bus-stop for a moment and he said he
would charge me $50 for the knowledge of each plant. This was
the going rate for gringos, he said. (10) No way, I say, I don't
have
that kind of money and that's not really the focus of my project,
as he dropped the price to $25. So we went onward and I watched;
he said little if anything. Before leaving the forest for the open
field again, he suggested we rest by a small pool, whereupon he
suggested that perhaps 1 would be willing to trade sex for samples.
The old crow!
Religious Identity
Also inescapable, religion shapes gringa myth and personal
experience. (11) As it happens, Kane and Klein do not fit squarely in
the center of either gringo/a category, which along with speaking
English and having pockets full of cash, includes Christianity as a
salient feature. Because since the Conquest and still today Jews have
figured so bizarrely in the missionaries' foreign-peopling of Latin
American social and mythical imagination, surprises occur. As Jewish
gringas, we have an irresistible ability and sometimes defensive
necessity to use our anomalous existence to confound expectations. Our
composite identities as gringos/gringas/Jewish/anthropologists, have
variously come to the fore as we pursued research goals, whether we were
searching for native Toba speakers in the Gran Chaco or tree frogs in
the Xingu. (Klein is a linguistic anthropologist and Kane was an
ecologist before discovering cultural anthropology and folklore.)
Klein 1977-1978 Paraguay and Brazil:
I self-identified as an anthropologist, because linguists are
closely identified with the Summer Institute of Linguistics (SIL),
and a few other evangelical missionary groups, and their role
in Christianizing the native population always lurked in the
background.
From the perspective of our research counterparts, our empirical
existence as fully human may be far from clear, even as we proceed with
systematic scholarly inquiry. This is not to say that we are always
pushed way out to imaginary edge-zones of colonial encounter where
horned creatures, dwarfs with backwards feet (duendes), or Death itself
in a body with no liver lurk. Nevertheless, possibilities of dangerous
transactions exist. And between the forces of development and war
emanating from distant realms, suspicion of gringos' full humanity
continually renews itself. None of this necessarily signifies a lack of
desire for spoils of war or development. Hence ambivalence, tentative
hopefulness, and a reliance on magical discourse, mark exchanges (Kane
1994/2004).
Professional Barriers (Hostilities)
The magical-real may contribute to gringo-strangeness and to
hostile political environments that affect anthropologists seeking
entrance to fieldwork spaces.
Klein 1971 Argentina:
When I first went into the field in 1971, I did so with grants
from the US government and with letters indicating the scope of
my dissertation project. A part of the introduction to fieldwork
overseas is the need to touch base with the players in the country
one is going to work in. Accordingly, I made an appointment
to see the professor I had been told was working on an analysis
of the Toba language. Minutes into our conversation I was told
by that investigator that he had done all the work on the Toba
language and that I should go home and work on North American
indigenous languages. Of course, I didn't follow his advice and
began my fieldwork through contacts with other scholars and
indigenous consultants.
Klein 1978 Brazil:
Another moment of hostility occurred when I was attempting to get
permission from the Brazilian agency that controlled access to the
indigenous reservations. I had been told that permission had been
granted and that the permission would be radioed to the chefe do
posto (head honcho on the reservation). However, when 1 arrived
on foot at the reservation, I was placed under house arrest on the
Kadiweu reservation for 48 hours because the permission had not
been received. When finally clearance, via radio, was confirmed, I
was told that I could only work with the oldest resident, a woman
without any teeth, because since I was a gringa and not a native
speaker of Portuguese, my not understanding her speech wouldn't
matter. And, in this case, I really did not get as much work done
as I could have. (12)
On the other hand, regional class distinctions can move a gringa
into a preferred position.
Klein [1972] Argentina:
As a gringa I was accepted as a preferred investigator compared to
local anthropologists. Because Spanish was not my first or second
language, and I felt that communication was more important than
impeccable grammatically correct sentences, I did not correct the
provinciano accent or any grammatical errors in Spanish by my
consultants. At one point when I was working in Resistencia in
Chaco province, I was accompanied by a local anthropologist from
Buenos Aires who was interested in how the elicitation process
works. On our first day there, she interrupted our conversation
and kept correcting the Spanish of my Toba consultant. Finally,
my consultant told me in Toba to get rid of my 'friend'.
Trapped by the image of gringo as bandit, Kane was refused
"official" entrance to fieldwork in the Amazon.
Kane 1980 Brazil:
Through pure serendipity, and without much lead time, I got
funding to record bird songs and tree frog calls in the Amazon for
my Masters thesis. My advisor, Dr. Blair, sent me to Dr. V in the
Museum in Sao Paulo to get permission. I don't remember Blair's
exact words but I do remember Dr. V's. He stood and cried out as
he waved his arms furiously around his head: "Blair! That Bandit!
That Saboteur!" He continued the tirade condemning Blair for not
sharing properly, perhaps a valid complaint from Dr. V's point of
view, I cannot say. Upon my request that he grant my permission
despite the misunderstanding, he sent me on a wild goose chase
through the city's tangled traffic to get signatures from
scientists who were all on vacation.
So I began my journey without official permission. From Ceara to
Belem to the Xingu, everywhere I attempted to set up base camp,
something would happen: an emergency (a man run over by a truck
was saved by the mud his organs were pressed into and had to be
carried out through the forest and put on a passing bicycle to get
to the hospital; a woman was bitten by a snake) or my equipment
would conspire to fail at the most impossible moments. Eventually,
I thought, 'No enough, I must work at a proper field station.' An
overloaded ferry crisscrossed with layered hammocks brought me
from Altamira to Manaus whilst everyone asked me if I was going,
as they were, to see the visiting Pope. In Manaus, I worked through
official channels for three months, patiently establishing the
required paper trail to get permission to do research. I remember
the day the last letter was to be signed. As I approached what I
thought would be the last step toward acceptance, the man who
was meant to sign off on my research plan emerged from a building
with whom else but Dr. V. When Dr. V saw me and realized that
I had circumvented him, he yelled: "How dare you! You gringos
think that you can do anything you want!" After that, I gave up
and went to have fun in Rio.
As Kane hoped to begin her dissertation research, she entered a
different historical configuration, where a subcategory of the gringo/a
identity rose to salience as an obstacle.
Kane 1985 Panama:
I arrived in Panama City in hopes of meeting Embera leaders and
confirming permission to work in a Darien village just as they were
mobilizing an international conference of indigenous peoples. Now in
this venue, it was not about gringos not getting in, because gringo
missionaries were allowed (a woman from the Baha'i faith took me
under her wing during this episode). In this venue, it is gringo
anthropologists who were not welcome, or more accurately, who figure
specifically, ideologically as reviled (most strongly among
representatives of northern first nations). Neither my gender nor
ethnicity (Jewish and American from New York via Russia and Hungary)
could tilt me out of the anthropology category because this was indeed
an ethnographic project. I succeeded in my struggle to get official
permission with a combination of agony and fierce string pulling, i.e.,
both questioning and making full use of my gringo-hood. Eventually, I
was granted permission to first go to the smallest, furthest upriver,
most traditional village, away from all the Christian contests between
evangelicals and Catholics. I eventually got to live in a more central
village, which is where I recorded the two personal experience
narratives that became the title of my hook The Phantom Gringo Boat
(Kane 1994/2004).
Tribal Myths: Jews in the Christianized Imaginary
Levi-Strauss (1967) believed that all myths were one myth because,
like language, its deep structure is wired into neural networks. No
matter how strange at first hearing, at some level of analysis all myths
are thus translatable, decodable. We think the gringo myths we present
here are unified by their power to pull us into narrative orbit, even if
we don't share belief in basic assumptions. When Favreet Saadat
(1980) studied witchcraft in the French Bocage, despite the fact that
she was carrying out an empirical investigation, she was pulled into the
supernatural web that her neighbors and subjects spun. We too were
trapped by gringo empire past and present. Trapped, but not without
verbal art, which appears here in accidental, conscious, unconscious
forms.
National and Cultural/Religious Identities
Klein 1982 Panama
The mythic web of biblical history enters here perhaps. In 1980,
I was asked by a friend, a Jesuit anthropologist, how to assist a
community of priests and nuns who were involved in helping a
group of Ngobe deal with some multinational corporations and
the Panamanian government, who were interested in developing a
copper mine (Cerro Colorado) on the Ngobe land. The language
spoken by these people has a very difficult vowel system and the
clergy who were trying to help were unable to make headway in
understanding, let alone speaking, Ngobere. My friend thought
that if I taught a field methods course in the field to both the
priests and the nuns, perhaps they would gain some knowledge
about the language's sound system and its grammatical structure,
thereby making it easier for them to learn the language. However,
in order to teach the course I had to get permission from the
bishops of the two provinces involved in this learning project. (13)
I wrote to the bishops explaining that first of all I was an
American, that I was a female, a gringa, and that I was Jewish.
Their immediate response was that there was no problem with
my working with their colleagues; after all, the woman they revere
the most was Jewish. (14)
And so Klein's entry was founded on a disconcerting premise, a
misalignment perhaps of the meaning of the (Jewish) Blessed Mother to
Jews as opposed to Christians. A similar misalignment of meaning, though
not falsity, accompanies Klein's use of the image of tribe.
Klein 1979 Paraguay:
The next Jewish story takes place on a field trip to survey the
indigenous languages of Puerto Casado a port town in the western
part of the country where there were five different linguistic and
cultural indigenous groups living. I was asked to what tribe I
belonged. Solidarity was achieved when I indicated that I belonged
to the tribe of Israel.
In Historical Metaphors and Mythical Realities, Marshall Sahlins
(1981: 6) wrote:
"[T]he world may not conform to the presuppositions by which
some people talk about it. In the event, speech brings signs into
"new" contexts of use, entailing contradictions which must be
in turn encompassed by the system. Value is truly constituted in a
system of signs, but people use and experience signs as the names of
things; hence they condition and potentially revise the general
conceptual values of linguistic terms and relations by reference to a
world. The encounter with the word is itself a valuation, and a
potential revaluation, of signs."
In the next vignette, Klein embodies an encounter with the word
"Jew" and her imaginary horns.
Klein 1974-1979 (Argentina and Paraguay):
In the more remote Chaco areas that I traveled in, when I was asked
what religion I belonged to--the expected answer being Christian,
or evangelical, or Catholic--and answered that I was judia or
hebrea, the immediate reaction was a move to feel the horns on my
head. They were always disappointed that there weren't any. The
question was posed by both indigenous leaders and my language
consultants. Of course, the action of someone actually feeling my
scalp--a creepy kind of feeling--led to teachable moments where
I could correct erroneous and ancient dogma brought to the New
World by the Spanish clergy and still repeated in the 21st century.
Polysemie words create logical conundrums, especially where gender,
religion, and nationality are involved. Among Jews, the confounding
power of being a gringo/a may fade in significance, outweighed by other
commonalities. Often more salient, however, are the logical properties
of being a gringa, that is:
A Gringa = a kind of Gringo (but)
A Jew does not (necessarily) = a kind of Gringo
When part of a group, a gringa is commonly subsumed under the term
gringo(s), losing gendered meaning [as in (wo)man]. But in general,
women can usually be visually identified in a crowd of people called
gringos. Womanhood, however flexible, is an embodied term. (15) In
contrast, one's Jewishness--except from within sartorially marked
orthodox enclaves or when generated as racist/anti-Semitic
stereotypes--can stand hidden in the light. In other words, Jews have
more of a choice to hide/reveal their identity than do women.
Technically, in short, we propose that a Jew can be fully American, but
never fully a Gringo, because a basic element of Gringo-hood is
Christian.
Shenanigans in Urban Gringo Enclaves
The meaning and authority of gringo/a identity reproduces itself
through official and everyday practices which shape social imaginaries,
paradoxically moderating and exacerbating the negative projections upon
persons.
Klein 1972 Argentina:
When I started my initial language fieldwork in Argentina, I
worked with some urban speakers of Toba in the city of Buenos
Aires. My language consultants regularly came to my apartment,
sometimes one of them, sometimes three. A few months before
1 left to return to the United States, the apartment I had rented
went into foreclosure. It turned out that the landlord had not
deposited my rent money to cover his mortgage, but instead used
it to pay for an apartment for his mistress. The bank insisted
on my cooperation in allowing open houses for potential buyers
and the hanging of a sign from the balcony--both actions being
distressing and inconvenient for me. As the final month of my
rental contract drew near, I decided not to pay the last month's
rent. 1 was advised that it was unlikely that I would get my
security deposit back without a legal battle. And so, since I
wouldn't pay the last month, the landlord retaliated by initiating
a lawsuit against me. His grounds were that because I had all kinds
of people [indios] coming into the apartment, I was running a
brothel. And wasn't that a terrible thing for a gringa to be doing?
The advantage of being a gringa, though, was that I was able to
utilize the United States Embassy for legal advice and a quick
end to the suit resulted, with my being able to clear my name as
a gringa Madame.
Kane 1984 Panama
The gringos controlled a large swath on both sides of the Panama
Canal and the U.S. Southern Command for all Central and South
America was deep inside a giant hill overlooking the Pacific edge
of Panama City. A Panamanian colleague told me disdainfully
that gringos always run to the zone whenever they are afraid
some political thing might be going wrong. (His disdain did not
interfere with his right hand that repeatedly slipped off the car's
gearshift onto my knee before groping up my leg in the mercifully
short drive to a discussion group.) I'd gone to the Fort Clayton
Army Base to get maps. A cartographer told me that when I came
to the city on break from the upriver forest, I could avoid my
rather hefty pension bills by staying on the base. I'd come in for
one or two weeks every six or seven weeks, whenever I ran out of
food upriver. I met a jumpy Special Forces guy who boasted of his
prowess, miming how he picked up men by their necks and slit
them open from neck to balls with a machete. The best time was
when I shared the women's dorm with a group of Puerto Riquena
soldiers who hung out in the common areas dancing, laughing,
living joyfully. Technically, as Latinas from a colonized island, I
suppose they were not gringas, but they were in the gringo army.
It is possible to realign interests and play with identities,
lending the advantages of gringo-hood to others.
Kane 2007 Brazil
They wanted to show me the neighborhood hangout where they
cavorted with friends and lovers in their youth. Called 'The
Holes' after two small coves set below the promontory facing the
Atlantic Ocean. For Rio Vermelho neighborhood people, the drive
provided the only access to the beach and the panoramic view.
Middle-aged women by this time, Iza's sister said gleefully, "Today
we don't have to ask permission because she (pointing to me) is a
Gringa and does not have to ask." The fact was, my being a Gringa
happened to be convenient for us all this afternoon although we
all realized its underlying unfairness even as we played its game.
As we sat on the promontory facing the sea, we talked about how
racism is unconscious. (16)
Migrations and Alliances: Ancestral Fractals
Although it was scholarship and friendship that brought us
together, we both have Jewish ancestry. As we got more deeply into
analyzing our fieldwork experiences for this essay, the salience of
Jewish culture emerged in surprising and serendipitous ways. We came to
understand both personally and analytically that when we enter
fields--of anthropology, of fieldwork--we do so with preexisting
structures and with their potential for agency and surprising alignments
and collaborations. Here, the sociolinguistic gringa fractal catches
Kane in the Port City Project as she does a walking tour.
Kane 2007 Brazil
As we walked through the historic port area of Recife one early
January day, my friend Iza spoke of the Jews' role in Recife's
history: Escaping the Spanish inquisition, Jews in the 17,h C.
helped build an island port in the city of Recife but left when the
Dutch were defeated by the Portuguese. A small group moved to help
found the commercial center on an island in another port city,
Manhattan. Many others moved to different islands in the Caribbean
and some to Surinam, for example.
This is Iza's way of talking about our mutual history, of
mediating our identities by subtly shifting the historical referents
away from Pan-Latin American interpretive frame of gringo-hood. As
artist and city planner, she conceptualized sequential Jewish
settlements as fractals. Like the forms of rivers and snowflakes whose
fractal patterns repeat in space and across scales, these two mercantile
centers of port cities founded by Jews are socially as well as
geographically fractals; for Iza, repeated experiences. (17)
Jewish mercantilism as a fractal:
If I (Kane) think of my relationship to a Jewish ancestral past, it
follows the linear splitting branch of a tree whose genetic roots
are elsewhere; this past inheres fully to the movement of escape
away from pogrom-riddled places. So, my ancestral past is ruptured.
And even though I recently learned from my cousin that families in
Russia and Israel doing Internet genealogy found us, the "lost
branch" who left for Philadelphia and New York, I do not reach out.
I'd rather think in an Izarian way in terms of fractals: my past a
fractal relationship of infinite belonging to an ancestral Jewish
past, like sand shapes on a busy shore carved by waves and feet.
Iza, in conversation created this way of imaging her past so that
it overlaps with mine, deepening our empathie connection. On that
day in the ancient port by the first synagogue in the "New" world,
the Jew in me takes precedence over the gringa, which releases me
temporarily from the burden of gringo-hood. Interrupted by war, the
Jews from Recife went to New York, where centuries later my
grandparents landed and successfully entered into the garment trade
and other businesses on the island of Manhattan. Or (fantasizing
now), I could animate an imagined relationship with the Jewish
traders who established the spice trade in Cochin, Kerala, India in
the 15th Century in a creative, open project to animate fractal
relationships that assume various forms in port cities, islands,
enclaves of mercantile trade, cultural intersections among fictive
and genealogical families.
Like most New Yorkers, I think of myself as a New Yorker, no matter
where I live now or where my ancestors originally came from. And unless
I travel, or go a movie, the spoken word gringo/a won't often come
up. It only becomes pertinent at key moments such as the day I am
walking in Salvador da Bahia where Iza and her sister grew up.
Klein's family experienced a shared history but a dramatically
different trajectory.
Klein 1965 Argentina
German/English-Spanish:
In the 1920's, one of my mother's sisters and her husband and one
of my mother's brothers and his wife made their way to Argentina.
They all came from a small town in Germany, near the Dutch border,
where for centuries the family had been cattle farmers. My aunt's
husband continued the tradition, first by living and working on the
rural Baron de Hirsch estates in Entre Rios, but eventually by
becoming a butcher settling in a town outside of Buenos Aires. My
uncle began the same trajectory but quickly decided to become an
urban dweller and then worked in a steel factory, thereby
abandoning the long tradition.
In 1965, while I was living in the province of Buenos Aires, my
mother, who had not seen her siblings and their families for over
forty years, came to Buenos Aires to visit me and my family. The
siblings had a wonderful reunion at which my major role was as a
translator. What had transpired in the forty years of basic
non-communication was that the Argentine relatives mixed their
German with Spanish and my mother mixed her German with English. I
recall sitting in the back of a limo, which took my mother from the
airport to my uncle's house, with my head swiveling from my mother
to her brother, from her brother back to my mother, each asking me
to translate or explain in English or Spanish, what the other was
saying. It was great fun, and as a linguist, it was interesting to
see which words (not so much grammatical constructions) were so
different.
I (Kane) have to return to the peculiarity of being a Jew and a
Gringa. As a granddaughter of immigrants, I was trained to engage
flexibly with contradiction, e.g., we kept kosher in the house but were
allowed to eat ham sandwiches outside. Bubbe and Zayde left the little
Ukranian village of Kibblitch days before everyone was killed in a
pogrom. As far as I'm concerned, that past is as unwanted as the
bad card reading I got once in midtown Manhattan. But travel I must and
as I do, I carry the political unconscious of a Jew, always honing and
transacting escape routes. And if I travel, as is my wont, in Central,
South America and the Caribbean, I will continue encountering myself as
a gringo fractal. Encouraged as a child to reach for all things American
except Christianity (especially humor, food, a passion for social
justice), Gringos were as far from the model in my grandparents'
minds as Texas is from the Lower East Side. So, on some level, I find
Klein and myself here tasked with reconciling callings, identities,
attributions.
Bubbe cookies:
As Klein had spent a good part of her career in the region, before
I left for the field in 2006,1 asked her for contacts in Buenos
Aires. She gave me the names of a couple, friends, who lived in the
city, were Jewish, and had also spent time on a university campus
in the U.S. Lovely and gracious hosts, they invited my husband and
me to their art-filled flat a number of times for dinner. One time,
to my astonishment, we were offered exactly the kind of plain,
diagonally-cut cookies that my grandmother used to make in large
aluminum pans: Bubbe Cookies!, a Russian Jewish food that, in my
mind, typifies the mundane celebration of family life. In a rush of
perception, like a time machine delivery to Bubbe's kitchen table,
belly over-full, cousins laughing, my father spreading jam on the
always too-dry cookies and sipping tea, while my mother, her sister
and Bubbe argue in Yiddish about something in which we children
have no interest. Little did the matriarchs know then that I would
be mistaken for a Gringa one day! Happy would they be to know that
I would grow up to be an itinerant word merchant with the power to
choose how to be or not to be a Gringo/a.
Here we work backwards from the vignette where bubbe cookies
connected Kane to our non-gringo friends in Argentina, to relate how
Klein's connection to our friends (Ana and Sanni) started. The
combination of friendship communicated through multiple languages and
intertwined families during the dictatorship years reveal the layered
foundations upon which future networking would build.
Klein 1971 Argentina
My connection to Ana and Sanni was as a result of their children
attaching themselves to my children in an Argentine Jewish day camp
in 1971. Ivonne and Guido spoke some English, my Rachel and Dan
spoke some Spanish, all loved soccer and swimming, and so
friendship among the children, led to friendship with both sets of
parents. Ana and Sanni supported me when my Toba grammar was
censured during the bad years in Argentina (Klein 1981). They
served as my protectors in ways that Jews have found protectors for
centuries.
The bubbe cookie episode, our last, shows how the distinctive
cultural salience of food evokes connections among members of an ethnic
group whose fractal potential for embodied connection had been sundered,
disoriented and re-oriented by centuries of global immigration and
exile. Together with the other stories we tell here, we show how each of
the levels of our identity reiterates, harmonizes, fractalizes
experience and knowledge. Klein's friends, Jewish, become
Kane's friends as our (more often than not latent) Jewishness comes
to the fore of our identity complex as gringa anthropologists. We might
even be able to say that being Jewish opened some doors that our other
identity bits clinging to gringo-hood might not have.
As we explore the fractal dimensions of gringo-hood in the
sociolinguistic vignettes presented here, we move away from the use of
'gringo' as epithet evoking colonial ideology and toward the
contrasting migrations and alliances that build upon and within its
categorical imperatives.
Conclusion
The event thus enters culture as an instance of a received
category, the worldly token of a presupposed type. Marshall Sahlins
(1981:7).
Our personal narratives reflect the fractal patterns of
sociolinguistic interaction. Furthermore, each narrative is a token of a
type, which because of its difference from every other narrative, shows
us the potential for defining diverse communicative events. Utilizing
the definitions of gringo/a, we demonstrate the power of the word to
project history into the present and myth into personal and professional
experience. Finally, using these definitions as a heuristic device and
ourselves as folkloric subjects, we have been able to maximize our
analytic power of the socially situated experiences and the different
forms of talk we encountered.
References
Adams, Abigail. 1999. "Gringas, ghouls and Guatemala: The 1994
Attacks on North American Women Accused of Body Organ Trafficking."
Journal of Latin American Anthropology 4 (1): 112-33.
Diaz, Sofia. "1990. Bharata Natyam: A Hindu Fractal."
Anthropology of Consciousness 1 (3): 19-23.
Eckert, Penelope and Sally McConnell-Ginet. 1992. "Think
Practically and Look Locally: Language and Gender as Community-Based
Practice." Annual Review of Anthropology 21: 461-490.
Eysturoy, Annie Olivia. 1990. "La Gringa in Chicano
Literature. Universidad de Alcala."
http://www.recolecta.net/buscador/single_page.jsp?id=oai:dspace. uah.es:
10017/4771. Accessed on 2/10/12.
Favret-Saada, Jeanne. 1980. Deadly Words: Witchcraft in the Bocage.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gal, Susan. 2005. "Language Ideologies Compared: Metaphors of
Public/ Private." Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 15 (1): 23-37.
Kane, Stephanie C. 1988. "Omission in Embera (Choco)
mythography." Journal of Folklore Research 25 (3): 155-186
Kane, Stephanie C. 1992. "Race, sex work, and ethnographic
representation, or, what to do about Loki's toast." Canadian
Folklore canadien 15 (1): 109-117.
Kane, Stephanie C. 1994/2004. The Phantom Gringo Boat: Shamanic
Discourse and Development in Panama. Washington D.C.: Smithsonian
Institution Press. Second edition: Cybereditions.
Kane, Stephanie C. 2012. Where Rivers Meet the Sea: the Political
Ecology of Water. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Kahn, Hilary. 2003. "Traversing the Q'eqchi'
Imaginary: The Conjecture of Crime in Livingston, Guatemala." In
Philip C. Parnell and Stephanie C. Kane, (eds.), Crimes Power:
Anthropologists and the Ethnography of Crime, New York: Palgrave
Macmillan: 33-54
Klein, Harriet E. Manelis. 1999. "Narrative." Journal of
Linguistic Anthropology 9 (1-2): 167-169.
Klein, Harriet E. Manelis. 1986. "Styles of Toba
Discourse." In J. Sherzer & G. Urban, (eds.), Native South
American Discourse. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter: 213-235
Klein, Harriet E. Manelis. 1978/1981. 2nd printing. Una Gramatica
de la Lengua Toba: Morfologia Verbal y Nominal. Montevideo: Universidad
de la Republica
Kroskrity, Paul V. 2001. "Identity." In Alessandro
Duranti, (ed.), Key Terms in Language and Culture. Blackwell Publishers:
106-109
Lemert, Edwin. 1975. "Social Pathology as excerpted. In Stuart
H. Traub and Craig B. Little, Theories of Deviance. Itasca: F. E.
Peacock Publishers.
Levi-Strauss, Claude. 1967. Structural Anthropology. New York:
Doubleday.
Levi-Strauss, Claude. 1979. Myth and Meaning. New York: Schocken
Books.
Lindsay-Poland, John. 2003. Emperors in the Jungle: The Hidden
History of the U.S. in Panama. Durham: Duke University Press.
Mandelbrot, Benoit B. 1977. The Fractal Geometry of Nature. New
York: W.H. Freeman.
Nencel, Lorraine. 2001. Ethnography and Prostitution in Peru.
London: Pluto Press.
Paredes, Americo. 1958. "With His Pistol in His Hand": a
Border Ballad and its Hero. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Paredes, Americo. 1966. "The Anglo-American in Mexican
Folklore," In Ray B. Brown, Donald M. Winkelman and Allen Hayman,
(ed.), New Voices in American Studies. West Lafayette: Purdue University
Press.
Paredes, Americo. 1977. "On Ethnographic Work Among Minority
Groups: A Folklorist's Perspective." New Scholar 7: 1-32.
Pfohl, Stephen. 1994. Second Edition. Images of Deviance and Social
Control: A Sociological History. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Reuss, Richard A. 1974. "That Can't Be Alan Dundes! Alan
Dundes Is Taller than That!": The Folklore of Folklorists. Journal
of American Folklore 87 (346): 303-317.
Sahlins, Marshall. 1981. Historical Metaphors and Mythical
Realities: Structure in the Early history of the Sandwich Islands
Kingdom. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Shelemay, Kay K. 1991. A Song of Longing: An Ethiopian Journey.
Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Starr, June. 2003. "The Anthropologist Accused." In
Philip C. Parnell and Stephanie C. Kane (eds.), Crimes Power:
Anthropologists and the Ethnography of Crime. New York: Palgrave
Macmillan: 77-98.
Stoeltje, Beverly J., Cristie L. Fox and Stephen Olbrys. 1999.
"The Self in 'Fieldwork': A Methodological Concern."
Journal of American Folklore 112 (444): 158-482.
Acknowledgments: Thanks to all the many people and institutions who
contributed to our fieldwork over the years. Special thanks to Moira
Marsh for her contributions toward the folkloric framing of this work
and for seeing us, the authors, as folkloric figures. Thanks too, Diane
Tye and to our anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on earlier
versions.
Stephanie C. Kane and Indiana University
Harriet E. Manelis Klein
Stony Brook University
(1.) For the analytic role of the self in fieldwork and boundary
folklore (Paredes 1977; Kane 1988, 1992; Klein 1999; Stoeltje et al.
1999; Kahn 2003).
(2.) Cited in the Oxford English Dictionary (OED) definition of
/fractal/. See also Diaz (1990) for a fractal analysis of a Hindu
cosmology.
(3.) OED./gringo/ 1849 J. W. AUDUBON Western Jrnl. (1906) 13 June
100
(4.) OED /gringa/ D. MATHEWSON Down Mexico Way i. 6.
(5.) Ibid. 11.
(6.) According to Lemert's ( 1975:354) criminological theory,
secondary deviance occurs when the labeled internalizes the label and
begins to identify with it.
(7.) To explain the way we all use commonsense theory in a unstable
way, Pfohl (1994: 11-12) uses the example of walking into a dark room
and seeing a snake, which upon turning on the light, turns out to be a
garden hose.
(8.) This fieldwork resulted in my doctoral dissertation and
numerous other publications listed on my webpage:
www.linguistics.stonybrook.edu/visitors/ harriet.klein
(9.) One would not notice the difference from dress, architecture
or cooking styles; but their languages, though linguistically close,
were mutually unintelligible. They spoke to each other and Kane in
Spanish.
(10.) For example, the Old Man might have been referring to a
comprehensive medicinal plant collecting helicopter tour that was
carried out as part of a Lawrence Livermore project assessing the
feasibility of using a nuclear explosion to clear a bigger, wider Panama
Canal through the Darien (see Lindsay-Poland 2003: 81-84).
(11.) I (Kane) carried out ethnographic fieldwork in recently
formed villages in the Darien rainforest among the Embera and Wounaan
Indians. Many had not been out of the forest and if they had seen a
gringa at all, it would have been a missionary wife. I continually had
to distinguish myself from missionary wives, as a skewed form of
religious politeness would compromise social interaction. I would
clarify my religious difference by explaining that I did not believe
there was a little man with a long white beard in the sky, in effect
distinguishing myself as a secular, non-Christian person, not
necessarily as a Jewish person. The distinction was sufficient for
people to feel free to share with me a fuller range of mythical motifs,
e.g., the foundational anti-hero with a taste for menstrual blood, who
was erased from versions told to missionaries (Kane 1988). In subsequent
writing (Kane 1994/2004), I intentionally crossed or blurred boundaries
between the empirically knowable and unknowable, verifiable but
interpretable. I think of this as a kind of counter-gringo maneuver that
resists rearranging co-produced knowledge into hierarchical organization
marking off theirs/ magical, ours/scientific.
(12.) Actually, I did get enough data and with the work of others
was able to present a paper entitled, "Comparative Toba-Kadiweu
Semantics. Linguistic Society of America meetings, December 1979.
(13.) These are the same clergy referred to earlier.
(14.) This course held in three sessions totaling five months over
the period of two years resulted in the printing of the Manual
Provisional de Nga'bere, a combined effort of the clergy and Klein.
(15.) We realize that gendered appearance can be quite plastic, and
is, of course, among lesbians, transgendered folk, and transvestites. It
is the contrast between embodied signs of gender versus Jewishness that
we wish to draw out here.
(16.) See a more detailed version of this excerpt in Kane (2012:
70-71).
(17.) 2 January, 2007. Kane's field note typescript, p. 128