Music and youth: between us and the world, the future.
Jewsiewicki, Bogumil ; Letourneau, Jocelyn
Come what may today, Tomorrow's world belongs to us. NTM, band
from Saint-Denis, France
It is a truism to say that music is one of humankind's
most-used and best-loved channels for rendering and externalizing its
joys and sorrows, its euphoria and failures, its experiences and
expectations. Music is at the heart of both self-expression and
interpersonal communication. It is a bearer of identity as much as it is
a way of interacting with other people, near and far. And to do this, it
draws on a repertoire of signs that are much more universal than words
-- although the increasing use of a trite, almost over-polished kind of
American English (the "desperanto" of a globalizing world?)
may force us to moderate this assertion somewhat.
Such are the general hypotheses that inspired the production of
this special edition of Ethnologies. Readers will perhaps be interested
to know that this issue marks the end of a research project that we
initiated a few years ago on the highly topical question of the
expression of identity in the context of globalization. This project was
funded by the SSHRC and the FCAR,(1) and led to several individual and
collective publications, including many contributions from students
(Jewsiewicki 1995; Jewsiewicki and Letourneau [eds.] 1998; Letourneau
[ed.] 1997; Demers 1999; Leblanc 1999).
If there is a single conclusion that emerges from these works, it
is that current processes of globalization by no means annihilate "local" dynamics of the expression of identity. They do,
however, play a part in bringing their meanings up to date. They infuse
them with new rhythms, lexicons, sounds, body movements and so on. In
this way, bridges are built between the "local" and the
"global". Some links revitalize, others destructure, but all
are part of the endless regeneration of human groupings within a complex
dialectic of referents that mixes tradition and escapism. This is
definitely a factor in the transition of communities towards the mutant
and moving cultural places where the real gains and losses of meaning
are transacted, thanks to which these communities are redefining
themselves in a curious dynamic of self-recognition and self-rejection
that is at once alienating and liberating (Letourneau 1998, 2000).
The context of these transformations is thus composed of here and
elsewhere, of heritage and emancipation, of the performance and
production of "I" and "us" in relation to
"them" on the contemporary world stage. In this theatre of
immediacy and globality, young people's music contains a wealth of
social, cultural and identity resources -- which it is out aim to
apprehend in this special edition.
In this respect, our own point of view can be presented as follows.
If the various musics of the world to which young people listen, dance
and play out their global identity organize the fields of their
experience and their aesthetic sensibilities, then they also reveal the
horizons of their expectations. For this reason, it is essential to
investigate these musics in their broadest register, in terms of what
new meanings they signify. Unfortunately, social scientists often try to
grasp contemporary youth culture using a repertoire of rather stale,
outdated references -- i.e. their own, those that dominated the western
cultural universe of thirty years or so ago. This anachronism is
inopportune. Young people today the world over think about themselves
and the world in terms of world beat and world music. Their musical
universe, and hence their social universe, is polyrhythmic and
polysemic, just as their way of approaching the world is plural. This
composite reality can be expressed by the following phrase, formulated
from various extracts of music lyrics in this issue: when "reality
hits you (Dragusanu, p. 106), between us and the world (Kalulambi, p.
130), the future is unlimited (Dragusanu, p. 113), even though the past
never dies (Hadj Miliani, p. 240)."
Contemporary world music offers young people a fin de siecle (or
debut de millenaire) glossolalia. It gives them the power to speak a
language, the language of portable music -- for what young person today
is not rigged up with a walkman, discman or other roving electronic kit?
-- which encompasses all languages, all ways of living and communicating
in a globalized world. Simultaneously, they invent their plural
universals. Wherever they find themselves, young people reject the
symbolic status of immigrants awaiting integration or deportation. For
them as for Django Reinhardt, one of the great jazzmen of the twentieth
century, music "gives you the chance to be something else -- and
not something else instead for the time being" (quoted by Williams
1998: 18).
To be honest, our postulate was and remains quite simple: instead
of waiting for young people to come and express themselves in the places
where sociery would like to establish a dialogue with them, we should go
and listen to them, and interact with them if possible, in the places
where they debate their own fundamental questions, using their own
communicational codes. These debates may include the discomfort of
living in the present and the difficulty of living in a future that
represents both continuity with and rupture from the established past.
In western society, poetry has long been a genre -- and therefore a
social space -- in which the limits of the possible, the sayable and the
conceivable were tested, on an existential as much as an aesthetic
level. However, for at least the last ten years, music, and more
accurately, young people's music, has become the incubator for new
forms of communication, interaction and cultural statements. The
frontispiece headline of the March 30, 2000 edition of L'Evenement
du jeudi could not have put it more eloquently: "Rap, the triumph
of the new poets." In our view, the music of young people seems to
share with avant-garde poetry the same potential for positive
confrontation with the establishment, which seeks to convert all
emergent forms to its own tried and tested registers of meaning. This
situation is worthy of serious interest and not, as is often asserted,
cultural panic.
For a long time, probably since the West interiorized the French
Revolution's invention that state sovereignty and power should be
founded on popular majorities, social knowledge has been constructed on
a double misunderstanding. The Other, whether from "here" (the
internal foreigner) or "elsewhere" (the ordinary foreigner) is
always understood as being at a distance from what is presumed or
imposed as the norm. This approach can be seen as basically an
anthropological reading of the particular. As a result, political
perception of what the "Other" does reduces him or her to the
sum of the tactics that he or she mobilizes to survive for or against
the established order. In this interpretative approach, the
"Other" is only capable of reacting to the actions of the
political centre. And he or she is reputed to do this badly.
Young people's music, the worlds it designs and the rules that
it conveys are usually seen from just this rather derogatory
perspective, with its limits of reaction to / provocation of the
dominant society. Their music is understood as mere stirrings on the
fringe, mutterings from a margin that covets the centre. The
consequences of such a political reading of youth music are obvious. It
leads to a denial of the autonomy, personality and independence of the
bands, a denial of the sociopolitical spaces that young people gingerly
stake out, as well as the aesthetics that they elaborate in their music.
These aesthetics are ways of launching themselves into new modes of
cultural and existential being, and include the aesthetic of body
modification (piercing, tattoos, brightly-coloured hair, etc.).
More often than one might think, however, young people's music
is not a reaction to the centre or to the normative majority. It
consists of autonomous creations that rework, reorient and bring up to
date myriad elements of a common culture. It makes a positive, even
necessary contribution to the renewal of established societies.
Moreover, it participates in the reconstitution of these societies, or
even calls for and precedes that moment. Is this not this what Claude
Sirce, leader of Fabulous Troubadours, a band from Toulouse, France
meant when he declared: "It's not the rough suburbs that
invented rap, it's rap that invented the rough suburbs"
(quoted in Askolovitch and Nassif 2000: 9).
From one region to another of the French-speaking world, from
central and eastern Europe to the Congo via Montreal and Paris, music
helps young people to live in a world (or worlds) that they would like
to be different and that they wish to reinvent. One of the
characteristics of this world (or these worlds), identified by
Denis-Constant Martin in his meticulous analysis of Afro-American gospel
music (Martin 1998: 98), resides in the ambiguity between human love and
divine love or, as Dessislav Sabev writes in this special issue, between
the love relationship and the social relationship.
Young people's music, in the grace of its lyrics put to
rhythms and sounds, must be taken for what it is: an ensemble of
conversations about the world, its future and its past. Young
people's music is a complex affair. Some of it provokes reactions
while some of it is swallowed up by the indifference of the fans and the
market. Some is listened to avidly, some is ignored. Some swiftly makes
its mark, only to fizzle out abruptly in the fickleness of fashion. The
sonorities and messages of still other music, anonymous at first, can
turn out to become a perennial presence. All of it remains at
people's disposition for the resolution of any problems that might
suddenly arise and require an alternative interpretation of the world.
In this respect, Dominique Caubet's note is of particular
interest. The author describes the calm but thorough migration towards
the acknowledged centre of the French aesthetic of "foreign"
musical forms, which the centre would rather detain at the margins. If
music of North African inspiration and execution is becoming
increasingly accepted by French society, then its incorporation into
French popular culture is well under way. Such a cultural ingestion is
by no means exceptional. It has already happened many times to immigrant
groups and cultures. According to Caubet, the adoption by young French
people from the rough suburbs of expressions that come from Arabic or
one of its many dialects could possibly indicate a structural mutation
in the common cultural baggage of French youth. If new research were to
confirm Caubet's hypotheses, then the pertinence of this special
issue would also be vindicated, on the strength of its premise that no
identity can endure without renewal and intermixture.(2)
(1.) J. Letourneau, B. Jewsiewicki, "Conscience
d'appartenances. Entre l'histoire et le present,
l'individuel et le collectif, le local et le global, sur le mode
narrative et performatif" ["Consciousness of belonging:
Between the past and the present, the individual and the group, the
local and the global, in narrative and performative modes"], SSHRC
grant 1995-1998; J. Letourneau, B. Jewsiewicki, G. Breton, "Entre
la mondialisation et l'individuation. Horizons de
l'Etat-Nation contemporain" ["Between globalization and
individuation: horizons of the contemporary nationstate"]
FCAR-equipe grant, 1994-1997.
(2.) As Denis-Constant Martin so rightly reminded us (1999).
Reference
Askolovitch, C., and P. Nassif. 2000. Rap. La victoire des nouveaux
poetes, L'Evenement du jeudi, 20, 30, June 2000: 9.
Demers, Frederic. 1999. Celine Dion et l'identite quebecoise.
La petite fille de Charlemagne parmi les grands . Montreal: VLB.
Jewsiewicki, Bogumil. 1995. Mots savants, paroles indisciplinees et
musiques pop: quelques reflexions sur la normalisation des memoires. In
La memoire dans la culture, Jacques Mathieu (ed.): 95-112. Quebec:
Presses de l'Universite Laval.
-- and Jocelyn Letourneau (eds.), with collaboration of Irene
Hermann. 1998. Les jeunes a l'ere de la mondialisation. Quete
identitaire et conscience historique. Sillery: Septentrion.
Leblanc, Genevieve. 1999. Felix Leclerc en tant que figure
rassembleuse d'une communaute memorielle. Incursion au coeur du
pantheon franco-quebecois. Departement d'histoire, Universite
Laval.
Letourneau, Jocelyn (ed.). 1997. Le lieu identitaire de la jeunesse
d'aujourd'hui. Etudes de cas. Paris: L'Harmattan.
--. 1998. La nation des jeunes. In Les jeunes a l'ere de la
mondialisation. Quete identitaire et conscience historique, B.
Jewsiewicki and J. Letourneau (eds.): 411-430. Sillery: Septentrion.
--. 2000 [in press]. Passer a l'avenir. Histoire, memoire,
identite dans le Quebec d'aujourd'hui. Montreal: Boreal.
Martin, Denis-Constant. 1998. Le gospel afro-americain. Des
spirituals au rap religieux. Paris: Cite de la musique/Actes sud.
--. 1999. review of P. Williams' book Django. In Ethnologie
francaise, 29, 1 (1999): 146-148.
Williams, P. 1998. Django. Marseille: Parentheses.